1400

impressed, as all of them were, by the fact that the authorof the ’ Filosofia Chimica’ has had but three predecessorsin the honour just conferred upon him, those threebeing Volta, Plana, and Matteucci. The chairman wasthe eminent mathematician and engineer, the SenatorBrioschi, who in a few felicitously chosen sentences

conveyed the sense of pride shared by all Italiansat the bestowal on their compatriot of the blue ribbon ’of science. Signor Villari, Minister of Public Instruction,followed, and dwelt on the consummate merit of Cannizzaro,who from phenomena could ascend to law, and from lawcould evolve scientific harmonies. The Senator Todaro,the distinguished Professor of Anatomy in the University,gave the toast of the Royal Society of London,’ whichwas as cordially received as it was eloquently proposed.Professor Cannizzaro thereafter made a most instructive aswell as effective speech, in which he showed that it was inthe efforb to make his preelections clear to successive

generations of students that he had trained himself to reachthose laws, the coordination of which had won him the

recognition of the greatest court of scientific arbitration inthe world. This he illustrated by his mode of teachingthe atomic theory to his young audiences, and proved howthe university chair and laboratory can become as fertilein results for the painstaking professor as for the pupils forwhose enlightenment he labours. Such was the spilit inwhich, for thirty-three years, he had met his class, and hehad found his reward in the congratulations of his colleaguesand compatriots on the distinction conferred on him by theRoyal Society of London. Their participation in his successenhanced it in his estimation a hundredfold, for, in the wordsof Cicero, Qui tantus fructus esset in rebus prosperis, nisihaberet qui gauderet illis aeque ac ipse?’ Professor Canniz-zaro’s speech will be published in an independent form,and, meanwhile, it may be remarked that his merits as achemical philosopher and teacher are hardly greater thanas a practical hygienist in some of the most importantbranches of State Medicine. The monograph, entitled"Analisi Chimica dell Acque Potabili della Città. di

Roma," in which, under his direction, some of the ablestof Italian chemists cooperated, and which, published at theend of 1884, was fully dealt with at the time in THE LANCET,is but one out of many proofs he has given that the highestspeculative power may coexist with that of the minutest,most painstaking research, and that conscientious collectingand sifting of facts is the soundest basis on which to crownthe edifice of theory." -

THE LONDON WATER-SUPPLY.

THE subject of the present water-supply to London wasfully entered into in a special article of recent issue in THELANCET, and many of the statements there made with regardto the quantity and quality of the water abstracted fromthe rivers Thames and Lea are now confirmed in the official

report of the water examiner. In this report the unsatis-factory condition of the water supplied by the companiesduring the month of October receives considerable comment,both by the expertchemists actingon behalf of the directors ofthe companies (Drs. Odling and Tidy and Professor Crookes),and the expert, Dr. Frankland, who is specially appointed toreport to the official water examiner. The former state that,as a consequence of the exceptionally flooded state of therivers during the greater portion of the month of October,the character of the water supplied to the metropolis, inrespect to its degree of freedom from organic matter, was onthe whole less satisfactory than it has been found to be for along time past. The New River Company’s supply, thoughappreciably affected towards the end of the month, main-tained a high average standard; while the supply of theEast London Company from the Lea, and that of the

Chelsea Company from the Thames, were, owing doubtless

to the large storage area of these two companies, notaffected by the floods to any notable extent. In the case ofthe other Thames-supply companies, in different degrees indifferent instances, the proportions of organic matter present,as indicated by the degree of colour-tint of the water, andestimated by the combustion and oxidation processes, wereappreciably in excess of the proportions habitually met with.Dr. Frankland reports that the water abstracted from theThames by all the companies, except at Chelsea, was veryseriously affected by heavy floods. It was brownish incolour, and the organic matter in solution, although chieflyof vegetable origin, had been increased in amount to a veryobjectionable extent. It is evident that these companies,with their present limited storage, are unable to avoid thedelivery of polluted flood water. Efficient filtration had,however, been carried out in every case. The water taken

chiefly from the Lea by the New River Company was onlyslightly affected, but that derived from the same sourcelower down the stream by the East London Company con.tained considerably more dissolved organic matter than theThames water of the Chelsea Company, although much lessthan that supplied by the other Thames companies. Bothwaters were efficiently filtered before delivery. The deep-well waters of the Kent, Colne Valley, and East LondonCompanies, and of the Totbenham Local Board of Health,were unaffected by the floods. They maintained theirexcellent quality for dietetic use, and the Colne ValleyCompany’s water, having been softened before delivery, wasrendered suitable for washing. All these waters were clearand bright without filtration.

DEATHS UNDER CHLOROFORM.

THE facts about the death under chloroform at the

Ipswich Hospital have been as fully divulged as a coroner’sinquiry is capable of bringing about. The facts are similarto those of many other like cases, and this inquiry is

chiefly remarkable for the ex cathedra utterances of one ofthe surgeons who gave evidence, with the natural resultthat the lay press, usually muddled by medical evidence,has been more than ever confounded in this instance. The

patient was a mariner, aged thirty-six, upon whom a

trifling operation was about to be performed, andwas ansesthetised by the j tinior house - surgeon. He

struggled, and almost immediately the respiration ceased.The heart subsequently failed. Restorative measures wereineffecbual to resuscitate the patient. The surgeon in

charge of the case is reported to have said the patientdied from paralysis of respiration, that he regardedchloroform as protective to the heart, and, further, that" the old idea that persons died from the action of chloro-form upon the heart was exploded." The case seemsto point two lessons : first, thab chloroform shouldnot be employed for trifling operations when ethercan so well be substituted; and secondly, that until theprofession has more evidence before it, it is at least pre-mature for anyone to speak of either one or the other

theory as "having been exploded."Dr. Starling has favoured us with the following parti-

culars of the sad case of death under chloroform at Tun’bridge Wells on the 28th ult. :-"The patient, a clerk,

, aged fifty-eight, of spare frame, but of very fair health,had suffered for some years from internal piles, which, were removed by Dr. Adeney about a month before byi the clamp and cautery. No organic disease being present,iand nothing to contraindicate its use, chloroform waston that occasion administered by Dr. Starling on a

Skinner’s inhaler, was taken very well, and equally well- recovered from by the patient. The result of the operation was good as regards the piles, but some folds of loose tissue about the anus remained and gave trouble; these, by thes advice of a London surgeon, were removed on Nov. 28th.