The legal and ethical aspects of working with information about medicines Angela Emerson Wessex...
-
Upload
elizabeth-douglas -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of The legal and ethical aspects of working with information about medicines Angela Emerson Wessex...
The legal and ethical aspects of working with information about medicines
Angela Emerson
Wessex Regional Drug and Medicines Information Centre
Aim
To be able to make decisions taking into account legal and ethical considerations when working with information about medicines.
Objectives
By the end of this session you will be able to:– Handle ethical dilemmas in MI
– Describe key legislation that impacts upon MI practice
Ethical constraints
What are ethics…..
– A code of behaviour considered correct, especially of a profession or individual.
– They are moral principles or values held by an individual or group.
Ethical theories Consequence-based approach
– The consequences of what we do matter…but matter to whom?
– Lying is wrong because of the negative consequences it may cause but in certain circumstances it may be okay
Rule-based approach (aka deontology) – The rules matter– Lying is always wrong, regardless of any potential good
Ethical decision-making
Recognises problem needs to be solved or difficult choice made
Identifies the possible courses of action
Chooses and takes one course of action
Accepts responsibility for the action taken and the outcomes which are a result of the choices made
Ethical decision-making in MI
How long does it take for cannabis to leave the body?
Enquirer going for a job interview tomorrow.
Ethical decision-making in MI
Many situations faced are unambiguous – the decision will be obvious
Often a conflict between your job (providing information) and duty to another person
Different MIPs may reach different decisions in same circumstances
Ethical decision-making in MI
In practice most arise from members of the public
May also arise from police, media, legal representatives
Often not perceived as an ethical dilemma from the enquirer’s perspective
General principles
You do not have to answer every question that you are asked – how to say ‘no’
Always give yourself appropriate thinking time
Consult with an appropriate colleague and/or manager before answering
General principles
There is no one “right” answer to most dilemmas but you should be able to justify what you do
Do not answer queries that are beyond you sphere of expertise or resources
Research you answers thoroughly and document everything you do
Guidance
General– Medicines, Ethics & Practice Guide: A guide for
pharmacists• Act in the interest of patients and other members of the public• Ensure knowledge, skills and practice are up to date• Demonstrate integrity and probity, adhere to accepted
standards of conduct and do not bring the profession into disrepute
Specific– UKMI Guidance
• Police, media, third party, legal proceedings etc.
Legal considerations
Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998 Common Law of Confidentiality Human Rights Act 1998
Medicines Act 1968 and off/unlicensed medicines
Malpractice Law
Working with information Justification for observing confidence
The obligation of confidence– Negligence and professional misconduct– Exceptions (patient consent, need to know [vs. curiosity], threat to
others, public debate and press freedom [health professionals with HIV])
DPA 1998 Common Law of Confidentiality Human Rights Act 1998
Caldicott Guardians
DPA 1998
DPA 1998 effective from March 2000.
Provides a framework that governs the processing of personal data of the living.
Seeks to strengthen the individual’s right to privacy in terms of data processing by applying 8 principles.
DPA 1998 Processed fairly and lawfully Obtained for one or more specified lawful purposes
and not further processed– Research– Disease registers
Adequate, relevant and not excessive Accurate and kept up to date Not be kept for longer than is necessary for that
purpose Be processed in accordance with the rights of data
subjects under this Act Avoid unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal
data and accidental loss or damage Not be transferred out of the EEA
Common Law of Confidentiality
Not an Act of Parliament, but built up from case law.
Key principle is that information confided should not be used or disclosed further, except as originally understood by the confider, or with their subsequent permission.
Exceptions – solving a serious crime
Human Rights Act 1998 Article 8
Establishes the right to respect for private and family life.
Underscores the duty to protect the privacy of individuals and preserve the confidentiality of their health records.
Public domain information
Most information used in MI is in the public domain and not confidential
Ask yourself whether it is fair if the enquirer be given the information
Consider whether it is appropriate to give the information to the patient (or whether it is more appropriate to be given to the GP)
Freedom of Information Act 2000
The Act gives right to access information held by public bodies including the NHS
If patients wish to obtain information about themselves then the DPA 1998 applies.
If the information is not about them but about a public authority then the FOI applies.
Working with off/unlicensed medicines
Off-licence vs unlicensed
Medicines Act 1968 and off/unlicensed drug use
Liability and unlicensed drugs– Strict liability or fault (negligent) liability
Working with off/unlicensed medicines
– Tell the patient about known ADRs and that there may be other unknown ADRs
– Tell the patient about that the drug/dose/indication is not licensed by the authorities
– Reassure yourself that the body of opinion supports the use of the drug in these circumstances
– Keep detailed records (eg in notes) surrounding decision to use
– Review the patient regularly to assess benefit and ADRs
Working with copyright
Centrally negotiated NHS copyright agreement with CLA (www.cla.co.uk)
All NHS personnel
Breaching copyright is a legal offence and it is your responsibility to keep within the law.
When things go wrong – Malpractice Law
Malpractice litigation serves several functions– Seeking apologies and being held
accountable– Incentive to HCPs to maintain a high
standard of care– Retribution against HCPs (civil vs criminal) – Compensation
When things go wrong – Malpractice Law
Majority of malpractice cases brought under the law of negligence
3 key factors must be proved– Duty of care– Failed to reach the standard required by the law,
that is a standard acceptable to their peers– Injuries were due to the failure to practice properly
and not another unrelated accident – the ‘but for’ test
When things go wrong – Malpractice Law
Bolam v Friern Hospital Committee 1957
A person is not negligent if they acted in accordance with accepted practice at the time as decided by a responsible body of competent professional opinion.
When things go wrong – Malpractice Law
RPSGB Code of Ethics requires professional indemnity arrangements
NHS hospital pharmacists covered under the clinical negligence funding scheme for contracted duties.
Ensure job descriptions up-to-date
Professional constraints
Overlaps with legal and ethical constraints Principal functions of professional bodies
– Maintain a register of qualified practitioners– Remove those unfit to practise due to ill health or
misconduct– Oversee professional education– Give guidance on professional ethics
Self-regulation vs external accountability
Organisational constraints
Overlaps with legal constraints
Check if your Centre/Trust has a policy for– Enquiries from the media– Enquiries involving legal proceedings
(including those against your own Trust)– Enquiries from the police