The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

35
The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING

Transcript of The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Page 1: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

The Leaning Tower of Pisa

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING

Page 2: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Why Geotechnical Engineering?

“Virtually every structure is supported by soil or rock. Those that aren’t - either fly, float, or fall over.”

-Richard Handy, 1995

Page 3: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.
Page 4: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Case Study I: Building Foundation

Soft Clay Soil

20 ft of sand and gravel

15-ft soft fill and organic silt

Firm Soil or Bedrock

Weight of building (DL + LL) = 37,000 tons

Initial estimated settlement = 1 ft

Weight of excavated soil = 29,000 tons

Estimated settlement due to the net load of clay (37,000 – 29,000 = 8,000 tons) = 2-3 in.

75 ft

Source: Lambe & Whitman, 1969

Page 5: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Building 10 on M.I.T.’s Campus – Photo by Professor Zoghi, Sept. 1984

Page 6: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

•How deep?

•Size of the footing (mat foundation)?

•Groundwater table?

•Dewatering?

•Braced excavation?

•Damage to adjacent buildings?

•Quantity and rate of the estimated settlement?

•Stress distribution?

•Design bearing capacity?

Design and Construction Issues

Page 7: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

•Pile type?

•How deep?

•Spacing?

•Maximum allowable load?

•Pile efficiency?

•Driving/drilling?

•Optimum sequence of driving piles?

•How much variation from vertical?

•Adjacent buildings?

Alternative Foundations

Page 8: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Case Study II: Earth Dam

Source: Lambe & Whitman, 1969

Zoned Earth Dam

Page 9: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

• Dimensions? (Most economical design)

• Thickness of the rock facing and gravel to keep swelling of clay core to a tolerable amount?

• The moisture content and compaction technique (lifts, equipment, etc) to place gravel and clay?

• Permeability and seepage characteristics of the dam?

• Consolidation and settlement characteristics of underlying soil?

• Shearing strength parameters?

• Potential leakage under and through the dam?

• Factor of safety of upstream and downstream slopes?

• Rapid draw down effect?

• Seismic activity?

Design and Construction Issues

Page 10: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

http://www.geol.ucsb.edu/~arthur/Teton%20Dam/welcome_dam.html

TETON DAM

The Teton Dam, 44 miles northeast of Idaho Falls in southeastern Idaho, failed abruptly on June 5, 1976. It released nearly 300,000 acre feet of water, then flooded farmland and towns downstream with the eventual loss of 14 lives, directly or indirectly, and with a cost estimated to be nearly $1 billion.

Page 11: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.
Page 12: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.
Page 13: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.
Page 14: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.
Page 15: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.
Page 16: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.
Page 17: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Teton Dam Failure - Flood waters advancing through Rexburg, Idaho.

Page 18: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.
Page 19: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

LandslidesIn excess of $1 billion in damages and 25 to 50 deaths each year in U.S.

Page 20: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Loss of SupportBridge Collapse – Kobe EQ

Page 21: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.
Page 22: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Annual Damage in the U.S.

Page 23: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Geo-Environmental

• Municipal Solid Waste Approx. 3.6 lbs trash per

person per day Total trash = 216 million

tons Make up:

40% Cardboard

18% yard waste

9% metals

8% plastic

others

Page 24: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Landfills

Page 25: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Source: Coduto, 1999

How to Prepare?

Page 26: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Historical Perspective

Geotechnical Hall of Fame:

http://www.ejge.com/People/HallFame.htm

Page 27: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Charles Augustin de Coulomb

• Grandfather of the Soil Mechanics

• 1736-1806 (France)

• Friction and cohesion concepts

• Lateral earth pressures on retaining walls

• Structures, Hydraulics, Mathematics, Electricity, etc.

Page 28: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

William John Maquorn Rankine

• 1820-1872 (Scotland)• Thermodynamics and

soil mechanics• Lateral earth pressure

theory• Pioneering role as an

engineering educator

Page 29: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Karl von Terzaghi

• The Father of Soil Mechanics

• 1883 (Prague) – 1963 (Massachusetts)

• Coined the phrase…• First publication in

1925• Great many

contributions

Page 30: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Arthur Casagrande

• 1902 – 1981• Worked closely with

Terzaghi• Started soil mechanics

at Harvard• Received numerous

awards • Fundamental soil

mechanics problems…

Page 31: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Ralph Brazelton Peck

• 1912 – Winnipeg, Canada

• Co-authored a textbook with Terzaghi

• Initially a bridge designer…

• Several decades as a pioneering foundation engineer and educator

• Numerous awards

Page 32: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Alec Westley Skempton

• 1914-2001 (UK)• Established soil

mechanics at Imperial College

• Soil mechanics problems, rock mechanics, geology, and history of civil engineering

Page 33: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Nilmar Janbu

• 1920 -• NTNU – Norway• Ph.D. student of

Casagrande at Harvard• Slope stability

problems – Janbu Method

• Landslides in quick- clay

Page 34: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Laurits Bjerrum

• 1918-1973• The First Director of

NGI (1951-1973)• Quick clay• Progressive failure of

slopes• A “Giant”

Page 35: The Leaning Tower of Pisa GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.

Harry Bolten Seed

• 1922 – 1989• Father of Geotechnical

Earthquake Engineering

• UC Berkley • Pioneering work in

Geohazards