2 nd Coordination Meeting Halting Desertification in the Júcar River Basin (HALT- JÚCAR -DES)
THE JUCAR PILOT RIVER BASIN IN SPAINGuadalaviar Río Serpis Río Palancia Cenia Vinalopó Río...
33
1 THE JUCAR PILOT RIVER BASIN IN SPAIN Teodoro Estrela Jefe de la OPH de la CHJ
Transcript of THE JUCAR PILOT RIVER BASIN IN SPAINGuadalaviar Río Serpis Río Palancia Cenia Vinalopó Río...
1
THE JUCAR PILOT RIVER BASIN IN SPAIN
Teodoro Estrela
Jefe de la OPH de la CHJ
2
Location of Júcar River Basin
3
2.960Water Demand (hm3/year)
3.400Water Resources (hm3/year)
370.000Irrigated land (ha)
1.400.000Equivalent Population due to Tourism (inhabitants)
4.360.000Population (inhabitants)
43.000Area (km2)
Main figures of Júcar River Basin
DEL
DEL
T A J ODEL
C U E N C A
GUADALQUIVIR
CUENCA
DELC U E N C A
C U E N C A
C U E N C A
E B R ODEL
G U A D I A N A
S E G U R A
COMUNIDAD
MURCIA
CATALUÑA
VALENCIANA
CASTILLA-LA MANCHA
ARAGÓN
CUENCA
TERUEL
ALBACETE
ALICANTE
VALENCIA
CASTELLÓN¤
¤
¤
¤
¤
¤
Río
Río
Río
Turia
Albaida
Río
Algar
R. Amadorio
Alfa
mbr
a
Río Guadalaviar
Río
Serpis
Río
Palancia
Cenia
Vinalopó
Río
Cabriel
Río
Magro
Río
Magro
Río
Cabriel
Mijares
Río
Río
Turia
RÍO
JÚCARRÍO
JÚCAR
RÍO
JÚCA
R
E. de
E. Contreras
E. Guadalest
E. Beniarrés
E. Bellús
E. Escalona
E. BenagéberE. Loriguilla
Amadorio
CristinaE. María
E.deUlldecona
E. ArenósE. Alcora
E. Sichar
E. El Regajo
E. Tous
E. Arquillode S. Blas
E.deForata
E. Alarcón
∧
∧
∧
∧
∧
∧
∧
∧
∧
Cana
lA
c.
Real
Júca
rde
l
-Jú
car
Turia
CanalTuria
delCampos
- Segura
Tajo
Trasvase
- Segura
Tajo Rainfall
4
•Adaptation of Jucar River Basin Hydrologic Information System to WFD requirements
•Adaptation of monitoring networks to WFD requirements
•Characterization of surface water bodies
•Characterization of groundwater bodies
•Economic Analysis
•Analysis of pressures and impacts
•Public participation
Main activities
5
Adaptation of Information System
6
Improvements on groundwater water level monitoring network
lll
l l
llll
lllll
ll
ll
l lll lllll
lll
ll
l
l
ll
ll
l
l
l
l
ll
l
ll
l
l ll
llllllllllll
ll
l
ll
l
l
l
l
l
ll
l
l
ll
l
l
l
l
l
l
ll
l
l
l
l
l
lllll
ll
l
l
l
lll
ll
l ll
l
l
lll
ll
lllllll
l
l
l
ll
ll
l
l lll
lllll l
l
ll
ll
ll
lll
l
ll
l lll
ll l
lll
l
ll
lll
ll
ll
ll
ll
l lll
lll
ll
l
llll
l
lll
l
ll
ll
l
l
l
l lllll
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
llll
ll
l l
l
l
l
lll
l
llll
l
l
l
l
ll
l
l
ll
lll
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
ll
ll
l
l
l
ll
lllll
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
ll
lll
Existing monitoring sites (160)New monitoring sites (129)Aquifers
7
l
ll l
l l
l l
ll
llll
l ll lllll
ll lllll l
l llll ll
l
l
lllll
ll
lll llll ll
l
lllllllllllll
llll
ll ll
llll ll l
lll
lll
l
lllllll
l
l ll lll
lllll l l
lllll l
lll llllll
l lllllll
l
l
lll
llll
llllllll
lllll lllll
l
l l
llll
lllll
l
llll
ll
llll l
ll
l lll ll
llll
ll
llllll
llllllllll
ll
l
ll
l ll
ll
l lllll
llll
llllllll
l
l ll
ll
Biological monitoring network
• 254 points
• In operation from 1999
PARAMETERS
- Hydromorphological
- Biological
- Physic-Chemical
0200400600800
1000120014001600
6,5 44 58 86 119
170
236
299
324
351
403
419
442
494
Distance to origin (km)
Alti
tude
(m)
Macro invertebrates index (BMWP')
HighGoodModeratePoorBad
Reservoirs
Discharge
8
Júcar river at Alzira
Rambla de Cervera del Mestre
River typologies
I n t e r m i t t e n t
N o c h a n n e l
C o n t i n u o u s
9
Surface water bodies
Rivers
Coastal watersReservoirs
1 - 2 2 3
2 2 4 - 4 4 5
4 4 6 - 6 6 8
6 6 9 - 8 9 0
8 9 1 - 1 1 1 3
1 1 1 4 - 1 3 3 5
1 3 3 6 - 1 5 5 8
1 5 5 9 - 1 7 8 0
1 7 8 1 - 2 0 0 3
Digital terrain model (100 m x 100 m)
Drainage network with basins > 100 l /s and drainage area > 10 km2
10
Characterization of Aquifers
###
##
#### ####
#####
## #
#### #
### #
#
#####
###
#
#####
#
####
## #
##### #######
###### #
########
###
# ##
###
##
#
#
#
##
#
## ####
#### #
###
#
#
#
##
# ####
#
#
#
### #
#
##
## #
#
####
#
#
#
##
#
#
###
#
##
# #
##
#
####
#
#
# # ##
#
#
###
##
#
## #
##
#
##
#
####
####
###
##
#
#
# #
# ####
## ## ##
##
#
#
#
##
#
##
# #
#
#
#
#
#
##
### #
###
##
#
#####
##
####
##
###
##
####
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
###
#
##
# ##
#
H y d r o g e o l o g i c a l U n i t s
A q u i f e r s
# S p r i n g s
11
RESOURCE
AVAILABLE RESOURCE
Environmental restrictions
Environmental Restrictions: Ecological
discharges, groundwater outflows to the sea
Rate of overall recharge of the body of groundwater less the long term annual rate of flow required to achieve the ecological quality objectives
WFD introduces the concept of available groundwater resource
12> 10
5 - 10
2 - 5
1 - 2
0 - 1
Volumenes de retriccion
Environmental minimum flows associated to each aquifer
CODUHG NOMBRE UHG VOLUMEN (HM3)8.01 CELLA-MOLINA DE ARAGON 48.02 MONTES UNIVERSALES 208.03 ARQUILLO-TRAMACASTIEL-VILLEL 58.04 VALLANCA 68.05 JAVALAMBRE 19.58.06 MOSQUERUELA 15.58.07 MAESTRAZGO8.08 PUERTOS DE BECEITE 108.09 PLANA DE CENIA-TORTOSA 58.10 PLANA DE VINAROZ-PEÑISCOLA 408.11 PLANA DE OROPESA-TORREBLANCA 88.12 PLANA DE CASTELLON 748.13 ONDA8.14 ALTO PALANCIA 208.15 ALPUENTE 38.16 OLMEDA 18.17 SERRANIA DE CUENCA 478.18 LAS SERRANIAS 38.19 ALCUBLAS8.20 MEDIO PALANCIA 118.21 PLANA DE SAGUNTO 25.58.22 LIRIA-CASINOS 58.23 BUÑOL-CHESTE 58.24 UTIEL-REQUENA 178.25 PLANA DE VALENCIA NORTE 358.26 PLANA DE VALENCIA SUR 127.58.27 CAROCH NORTE 138.28 CAROCH SUR 28.29 MANCHA ORIENTAL8.30 JARDIN-LEZUZA8.31 SIERRA DE LAS AGUJAS8.32 SIERRA GROSA 68.33 ALMANSA8.34 SIERRA OLIVA8.35 JUMILLA-VILLENA8.36 VILLENA-BENEJAMA 88.37 ALMIRANTE-MUSTALLA 188.38 PLANA GANDIA-DENIA 588.39 ALMUDAINA-ALFARO-SEGARIA 28.40 SIERRA MARIOLA 88.41 PEÑARRUBIA8.42 CARCHE-SALINAS 18.43 ARGUEÑA-MAIGMO 18.44 BARRANCONES-CARRASQUETA8.45 SIERRA AITANA 28.46 SERRELLA-AIXORTA-ALGAR 48.47 PEÑON-MONTGO-BERNIA 48.48 ORCHETA 38.49 AGOST-MONEGRE8.50 SIERRA DEL CID 18.51 QUIBAS 18.52 CREVILLENTE8.99 IMPERMEABLE O ACUIFEROS DE INTERES LOCAL 4Total 671
13
Recursos < Bombeos
Recursos = Bombeos
Recursos > Bombeos
Recursos - Bombeos 2000
Recurso disponible < bombeos
Recurso disponible = bombeos
Recurso disponible > bombeos
Disponibilidad 2000
Differences between resources and abstractions (year 2000)
Differences between available resources and abstractions (year 2000)
Comparison between resources and abstractions
14
Groundwater abstractions
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
año
Hm
3
Urban supply Irrigation Industry Total
Groundwater abstraction projections for 2015
15
Resources and abstractions for year 2015
Differences between resources and abstractions (year 2015)
Differences between available resources and abstractions (year 2015)
Recursos < Bombeos
Recursos = Bombeos
Recursos > Bombeos
Recursos - Bombeos 2015
Recurso disponible < bombeos
Recurso disponible = bombeos
Recurso disponible > bombeos
Disponibilidad 2015
16
Mancha Oriental Aquifer
Irrigated Area
Abstractions
Water levels
Modelling
17
Marine Intrusion
Punto de Intrusión: 08.07.012 M-- OROPESA Cloruros (mg/l CL-)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
25/0
4/85
12/1
0/85
10/0
6/86
17/0
2/87
03/0
6/87
22/1
0/87
06/0
7/88
16/1
2/88
05/0
7/89
30/1
0/89
01/1
1/89
28/0
6/90
30/1
0/90
27/0
6/91
28/0
6/91
30/0
5/92
28/1
0/92
27/0
5/93
05/1
1/93
29/0
5/94
31/1
0/94
24/0
5/95
08/1
1/95
22/0
5/96
19/1
0/96
30/1
0/97
12/0
5/98
23/1
0/98
18/0
5/99
18/1
0/99
12/0
5/00
14/1
0/00
16/0
5/01
Pto. Intrusión: 08.07.012 M-- OROPESA Conduc.(MicroMhos/cm a 20º C)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
S E G U R A
G U A D I A N A
DELE B R O
C U E N C A
C U E N C A
C U E N C ADEL
CUENCA
GUADALQUIVIR
C U E N C ADEL
T A J O
DEL
DEL
ARAGON
CASTILLA-LA MANCHA
VALENCIANA
CATALUÑA
MURCIA
COMUNIDAD
CASTELLON
VALENCIA
ALICANTE
ALBACETE
TERUEL
CUENCA
¤
¤
¤
¤
¤
¤
p
l
llllllllll
l
llllllllll
l
llllllllll
l
lllll
l
ll
ll
l
llllll llll
l
lllll
lllll
l
ll
llllllll
l
l
l
lll
lllllllll
l
lll
llll
ll
l
l
llll
l
lllll
l
llll
lll
l l
l
l
ll
l
lllllll
l
lllll
lll
l
l
l
l
llll
lll
lll
l
llllll llll
l
llll llllll
l
ll
llllllll
l
lllllllll l
l
llllllll
ll
l
llllll
llll
l
lll
llllll
l
l
llllllllll
l
lllll
lll ll
l
l
lllllll
lll
l
llllll
lll
l
l
llllll llll
l
lllll
ll lll
l
lll
llllll
l
l
llllllllll
l
ll
llllllll
l
ll
ll
lllll l
l
lllll l
ll ll
l
llllllll ll
l
l
lllll
ll
ll
l
l
llllllllll
l
llllllll
ll
18
###
#
# ###
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
###
#
#
#
# #
#
##
##
#
#
#
#
#
##
##
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
# ###
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
##
#
#
#
##
##
##
##
###
# ##
# #
# #
###
3.50 4.703.10
3.90
3.307.60
5.80
8.90
4.705.60
8.10
9.10
4.50
6.30
2.50
2.50
3.102.80
4.002.80
5.802.503.60
3.90 2.502.50 2.80
3.80
4.70
9.704.10
17.50
13.60
48.0047.70
11.50 77.40
95.70
27.60
73.8097.60
10.40
35.60
14.50
91.50
47.2019.70
11.90
15.90
41.50
21.0019.6035.80
54.4011.20
41.3019.80 23.70
12.50
34.3045.10
49.30
78.90
14.40
27.6014.40
11.40
17.50
17.90
159.30
132.40
Nitrates
N i t r a t o s ( m g / l )
0 - 2 0
2 0 - 3 0
3 0 - 4 0
4 0 - 5 0
> 5 0
River Basin Authority
Municipalities andRegional government
Municipalities andRegional government
River Basin Authority
RESPONSABILITY
Canon de Saneamiento (only urban and industrial uses)
Wastewater collection and treatment
Canon de Control de Vertidos (only urban and industrial uses)
Control discharges
Tarifa de abastecimiento (Urban)Cuota de distribución (Irrigation)
Water Distribution
Canon de regulación (dams) andTarifa de utilización (channels)
Water availability(dams and main channels)
TARIFFSCOST
Spanish financial and economical regime for water use
20
E.deForata
E. Amadorio
E. Guadalest
E. Beniarrés
E. Arquillode S. Blas
E. Contreras
E. Benageber
E. Tous
E. Sichar
E. ArenósE. Alcora
E. El Regajo
E.deUlldecona
E. MaríaCristina
E. Loriguilla
E. Alarcón
Algar-Guadalest
Canal Júcar-Turia
Canal del Magro
Canal PrincipalCampo del Turia
Cost recovery analysis: Main river basin hydraulic infrastructures
BENEGEBERRESERVOIR
LORIGUILLARESERVOIR
CAMPO DEL TURIACHANEL
TRADICIONAL TURIARIVER CHANEL
CITY OF VALENCIA
Main hydraulic infrastructure at Benageber-Loriguilla System
Year 1955
Year 1967
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Wat
erav
aila
bilit
y(r
eser
voir
)
Wat
erav
aila
bilit
y(c
hann
el)
Wat
erdi
stri
buti
on
Was
tew
ater
colle
ctio
nan
dtr
eatm
ent
Dis
char
ge
ctm
€/m
3
Operational Investment Total cost
010203040506070
Wat
erav
aila
bilit
y(r
eser
voir
)
Wat
erav
aila
bilit
y(c
hann
el)
Wat
erdi
stri
butio
n
Was
tew
ater
colle
ctio
nan
dtr
eatm
ent
Dis
char
ge
ctm
€/m
3
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Total cost Tariff _ _ Recovery (%)
Costs and tariffs for urban users of Valencia city
Replace cost for dams have been assumed
02468
101214
Wat
erav
aila
bilit
y(r
eser
voir
)
Wat
erav
aila
bilit
y(c
hann
el)
Wat
erdi
stri
buti
on
Was
tew
ater
colle
ctio
nan
dtr
eatm
ent
Dis
char
ge
ctm
€/m
3
Operational Investment Total cost
02468
101214
Wat
erav
aila
bilit
y(r
eser
voir
)
Wat
erav
aila
bilit
y(c
hann
el)
Wat
erdi
stri
buti
on
Was
tew
ater
colle
ctio
nan
dtr
eatm
ent
Dis
char
ge
ctm
€/m
3
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Total cost Tariff _ _ Recovery (%)
Costs and tariffs for irrigation users of Campo del Turia channel
Replace cost for dams have been assumed
Total costs and tariffs for main users
0
20
40
60
80
100
120C
ity
ofV
alen
cia
Cam
pode
l Tur
iaIr
riga
tion
ctm
€/m
3%
rec
over
y
Total cost Tariff _ _ Recovery (%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Cit
y of
Val
enci
a
Cam
pode
l Tur
iaIr
riga
tion
ctm
€/m
3%
rec
over
yTotal cost Tariff _ _ Recovery (%)
Cost considering new dams Cost considering dams have been paid
25
Morphological alterations (small dams)
lll
lllllllllll
lll
lllll
l
lllllllllll ll
llllllllllllllllll
l l
llllllllll
lllll
llllllll
l
ll llllll
lllllll
lll ll
llll
llll
lll
l
l
l
l lll
lllll
ll
ll
ll
ll
l
ll
lllllll
lll
lll
lllllllll llllllll
ll
l
lllll
lllll
ll
llllll
ll
lllllll
lll ll
llll
lll
l
l
l
l
l l
l
llll
llllll
l
l
llllllll
llllll
lll ll l
ll
lllll
ll
l
l
lllllllll
ll
lllll
ll
lllll
llllllllllll lllll
l
l
l
llllll
ll
lllllllllllll lll
lllllllllllllllll
llllll lllllllll
llllllllll
lllllllllllllllllll lllllllllll
l
lll
l
l
l lllll
llllll
lllllll
lll
llllllllllllllll
l lllllll
llllllll
lllllllllllll
l llllll
ll
l
llll lllllllll
llllllllllllll
lllllll
lllllllllll
llllllllllllllllllllll
lll
l
l
lll
ll ll
lllll
llllllllllllllll
llllll
llllll
ll
lllllll l
lll
llllll
ll
llllll llllllllllllllll
l
l
ll
llllll
ll l
llllll
llll
llllllllll
lllllllllll
lllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
l
lllllll
lll
llll
lll
lllllllllllll
l
llllllllllll
lll lllllllll
lllllll
lllllllllllllllll
ll
llllll
lllllll
llllll ll llllllll
llllllllllllllllll
l
l
ll ll
llll
llll
l
lll
llllllllllllllllllllllllll
l
l
llllllll
llllllllllllllllllllll
llll
lllll
l
llllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllllllllll
llllllllllllllllllll
llllllllllll lllll
llll
llllllllllllllllllllll
lll
ll
l
l
l
ll l
l
l
l
lll l
llll
l
llll
l
l l
llll
llllllll
ll
ll
llllllllllllll
llllllll
l
lll
lll
l
26
Morphological alterations (channelling)
27
Discharge points and urban areas
Valencia Urban Area
28
Public Participation
Supply of information
Consultation
Active Participation
29Web Page http : //www.chj.es/
Supply of information: WEB page
30
Supply of information (I)
•Presentations in Meetings, Workshops, etc.
•Droughts within the European Water Framework Directive and implications on river basin districts. Seminario Internacional sobre gestión de recursos hídricos en situaciones de sequía, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, marzo 2003.
•Reunión de coordinadores europeos de cuencas piloto en el Joint Research Centre, ISPRA, Italia, Presentación del avance de los trabajos en la cuenca del Júcar. Abril 2003.
31
Supply of information (II)
•La Directiva Marco del Agua. Sala de Juntas de la Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar. Abril 2003.
• La Directiva Marco del Agua y la cuenca piloto del Júcar. Escuela de Caminos de la UPV. 15 mayo 2003, Valencia
• Análisis económicos en la cuenca piloto del Júcar. Sala de reuniones de la DGOHCA, 4 junio 2003. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Madrid.
32
Supply of information (III)
•The jucar river basin - First results, Seminar organised by EC on Integrated management -The river basin perspective, 2003, Athens, Greece.
•Meeting with ONGs (Organizaciones No Gubernamentales). Septiembre 2003
•Presentación The pilot Jucar River Basin. Economicalanalysis of water uses and cost recovery. Paris, ocubre2003.
•Presentación del artículo La Directiva Marco del Agua y la cuenca piloto del Júcar. Congreso Mundial de la IWRA celebrado en octubre, Madrid.
33
•Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar is takingpart in the project HARMONIRib funded by EC.
•Partners: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) of England , Geological Survey of Denmark, DHI of Denmark, CNR-IRSA (Italy), IDR UCLM (España), etc
European Research and Development Projects
