The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University...
-
Upload
jesse-anselm -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
6
Transcript of The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University...
![Page 1: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Integration of ACT and ERP
Michael TwohigUtah State University
Jonathan AbramowitzUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
![Page 2: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Plan for the session
• Jon: ERP• Mike: ACT and exposure• Jon: How he has used ACT• Mike: ditto• Time for case example and discussion
![Page 3: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Learning Theory View of OCD
• Obsessional stimuli evoke fear, anxiety, or distress
• Compulsions produce an immediate reduction in obsessional anxiety
• Compulsions are negatively reinforced by the immediate reduction of anxiety they engender
• The performance of compulsions prevents the natural extinction of obsessional anxiety
![Page 4: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Evidence for the Learning Model
BE AE AC AE .5h 1h 1.5h 2h 2.5h 3h0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Urge to ritualize
Anxiety/discomfort
An
xie
ty (
Inte
ns
ity
Ra
tin
g)
Rachman, de Silva, & Roper, 1976
BE - Before exposure to anxiety-evoking stimulusAE - After exposureAC - After compulsion
//
![Page 5: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Behavioral Techniques for OCD are Derived from the Learning Model
• Procedures that evoke obsessional anxiety– Exposure to obsessional cues (floors, driving)
• Procedures that eliminate the contingency between performing compulsions and anxiety reduction– Response prevention (refrain from washing or checking
rituals)
![Page 6: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Cognitive Model of OCD
• Obsessions– Intrusive unpleasant thoughts are universal• A thought about stabbing my child at dinner
– “Obsessive beliefs” lead to misinterpretation of normal intrusions as anxiety-provoking• “Only bad people have bad thoughts”
• “I am a bad person for thinking about this”
Rachman, 1997; Salkovskis, 1999
![Page 7: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Cognitive Model of OCD
• Compulsions– Rituals and avoidance reduce obsessional fear• Avoidance of child, keep knives locked up
• Asking for reassurances, checking, repetitive praying
– Avoidance and rituals prevent the correction of obsessive beliefs and misinterpretations
Rachman, 1997; Salkovskis, 1999
![Page 8: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
“Obsessive” Beliefs
• 3 domains of beliefs found to underlie the misinterpretations of intrusions and development of OC symptoms
– Overestimates of threat and responsibility– Importance of thoughts (need to control thoughts)– Perfectionism and intolerance of uncertainty
Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group(2001, 2003, 2005)
![Page 9: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Relationship Between Obsessive Beliefs and OC Symptoms
Pre-childbirth obsessive beliefs (...0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Lowest ( n = 22
Mid-Low ( n = 21)
Mid-High (n = 21)
Highest (n = 21)
Po
stp
art
um
OC
sy
mp
tom
s
(YB
OC
S 0
-40
)
Abramowitz et al. (2006) Beh Res Ther
*
*Grps 3 & 4 > grps 1 & 2 (p < .05).
![Page 10: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Cognitive Therapy for OCD is Derived from the Cognitive Model
• Psychoeducation – Intrusive unpleasant thoughts are universal
– How do avoidance and rituals maintain obsessions
• Cognitive restructuring– Identify and modify mistaken beliefs about intrusive thoughts
• Behavioral experiments– Test out new beliefs about obsessional thoughts
![Page 11: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
CBT for OCD Includes:
Situational Exposure: Prolonged confrontation with anxiety evoking stimuli (e.g., contact with contamination
Imaginal Exposure: Prolonged imaginal confrontation with feared disasters (e.g., hitting a pedestrian while driving)
![Page 12: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CBT for OCD Includes:
Response Prevention: Resisting compulsive urges (e.g., leaving the kitchen without checking the stove)
Cognitive procedures: Psychoeducation and discussions of mistaken cognitions
![Page 13: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Typical CBT Program for OCD
• Education and treatment planning
• Exposure to fear cues
• Reduction of rituals (Response prevention)
• Cognitive restructuring to augment ERP
• Self-monitoring of rituals
![Page 14: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Education and Planning
Goal: Helps therapist to understand patient’s OCD symptoms and helps patients understand the nature and treatment of their symptoms
• Thorough assessment of individual obsessional triggers, cognitions, rituals, and avoidance
• Discussion of the model and rationale for CBT
• Self-monitoring of rituals
• Exposure hierarchy development
![Page 15: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Cognitive Restructuring
Goal: Teach patients how to think accurately about feared thoughts and other stimuli so they will only be as afraid as the facts warrant
1. Identify a specific dysfunctional belief that produces obsessional fear (e.g., thinking about harming someone is as bad as actually harming)
2. Examine the evidence for the accuracy of the cognition
3. Revise the belief based on the evidence
4. Reinforce the new cognition with behavioral evidence (exposure and RP)
![Page 16: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Cognitive Restructuring
• Patients do not have to be 100% convinced in the senselessness of their beliefs for cognitive restructuring to be helpful
• Criterion for success: Patients doubt the accuracy of their assumptions about obsessional thoughts/stimuli enough to be willing to face their fears through exposure
![Page 17: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Exposure and Response Prevention
• Goal: Experientially test the accuracy of anxious predictions, such as:– Disastrous consequences will occur upon exposure without rituals– Intrusive thoughts are intolerable and must be avoided– Anxiety is unbearable and will last forever– Uncertainty is intolerable
• Practice confronting obsessional thoughts and feared stimuli in a planned, gradual, systematic manner using a hierarchy
• Reduce the use of safety behaviors (response prevention)
• Emphasis on just experiencing anxiety and obsessive thoughts/doubts without resistance until habituation
• Anxiety is regularly recorded on a 0-100 scale and practices last until anxiety goes down (50%?)
![Page 18: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Exposure and Response Prevention
• OCD symptoms are reduced when patients come to believe that – (a) their obsessional thoughts are meaningless,
– (b) they can cope with anxiety, which is not dangerous,
– (c) they can cope with uncertainty, and
– (d) the act accordingly (i.e., approaching, not fighting, obs. fear)
• Simply talking about uncertainty, anxiety, and probabilities of harm is not as convincing as direct evidence from experience
– Patients need to directly confront their fears to truly master them
• ERP is the most powerful part of the intervention
![Page 19: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Types of Exposure
• In vivo exposure - confronting feared stimuli in the environment
• Imaginal exposure - confronting feared mental stimuli such as thoughts, images, impulses, worries, and memories
– Like watching a scary movie 100 times over
![Page 20: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Effects of Repeated and Prolonged Exposure
10 20 30 40 50 600
102030405060708090
Session 1
Session 2
Session 3
Session 4
Time (mins)
SU
DS
![Page 21: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ACT and how it might be incorporated with ERP for OCD
• 6. Leads to broad research program• 5. ACT involves targeting these constructs
• 4. Target hypothetical constructs: Psychological flexibility
• 3. Relational Frame Theory • 2. Basic Science: Mostly behavior analysis• 1. Philosophy of science: Functional
contextualism
![Page 22: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
1. Philosophy of science: Functional contextualism
• Holistic and functional approach to analysis• Pragmatic truth criterion
![Page 23: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
2. Basic Science: Mostly behavior analysis
• Extinction involves new leaning and not unlearning– spontaneous recovery (passage of time)– disinhibition (presentation of a novel stimulus)– reinstatement (presentation of the US or reinforcer)– renewal (a change in context)– resurgence (new behavior introduced during
extinction places on extinction)• “optimizing learning …. based on increasing
tolerance for fear and anxiety” (Arch & Craske, 2009)
![Page 24: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
3. Relational Frame Theory
• Most active lines of research in behavior analysis
• Stimuli have meaning and function– This includes private stimuli
• Learned from experience and “verbally”• The meaning and function are controlled by
different contexts
![Page 25: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
4. Target hypothetical constructs: Psychological flexibility
Self asContext
Contact with the Present Moment
Defusion
Acceptance
Committed Action
Values
Psychological
Flexibility
![Page 26: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
5. ACT involves targeting these constructs
• Can be done within exposure exercises• Procedure– Contacting feared stimuli– And/or engaging in valued activities– While practicing ACT concepts
• Process of change– Psychological flexibility
• Desired outcome– Greater life functioning– Change in internal experience not a concern
![Page 27: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
6. Leads to broad research program
• Active research at each of these levels• But we will just focus on it as applied in this
area
![Page 28: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
ACT alone for adult OCD
Twohig et al. (2010). Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology
YBO
CS s
core
s
![Page 29: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
% treatment responders
![Page 30: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Refusal, drop-out, and acceptability
![Page 31: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
RCT of CBT vs ACT heterogeneous anxiety disorders
Arch et al. (in press). JCCP available online
![Page 32: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
RCT of CBT vs ACT heterogeneous anxiety disorders
Arch et al. (in press). JCCP available online
![Page 33: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
RCT of CBT vs ACT heterogeneous anxiety disorders
Arch et al. (in press). JCCP available online
![Page 34: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
RCT of CBT vs ACT heterogeneous anxiety disorders
Arch et al. (2012). BRAT
![Page 35: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Moderation
• “CBT outperformed ACT among those at moderate levels of baseline anxiety sensitivity, and among those with no comorbid mood disorder.”
• “ACT outperformed CBT among those with comorbid mood disorders.”
Wolitzky-Taylor etal. (2012) JCCP
![Page 36: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
How we use ACT and ERP
![Page 37: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
My Feelings about ACT
• I am an exposure therapist• I like ACT!• I think ACT overlaps about 75% with the goals
and techniques of exposure-based CBT• I think exposure therapists can incorporate ACT
techniques to enhance ERP– Adherence?
– Reduce dropout?
– Outcome?
![Page 38: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Exposure and ACT:My Take on the Similarities and Differences
• What’s similar– Importance of experiencing/confronting
unwanted obsessional thoughts, anxiety, and doubt/uncertainty– Importance giving up rituals and other forms
of subjective resistance to obsessional thoughts/fear
![Page 39: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Exposure and ACT:My Take on the Similarities and Differences
• What’s different–How OCD is explained to the patient–How outcome is measured: increasing
willingness vs. reducing anxiety–Use of metaphors to introduce conceptual
issues and rationale for treatment– Emphasis on values
![Page 40: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
How do I Incorporate ACT into my Work with OCD Patients?
(“What have I learned from Mike?”)
• More explicit discussion of willingness to stay in contact with OCD internal experiences (thoughts, anxiety, uncertainty)– Two scales metaphor
• Use of metaphors to explain the core problems in OCD and the rationale for ERP– Man in the Hole– Passengers on the Bus– Bum at the Door– etc.
![Page 41: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Mike: ACT and exposure therapy
• ERP is a well-researched, effective, and theory-driven treatment
• ACT and ERP can be consistent• But does not make it the same• ERP is more than just bringing someone into
contact with feared stimulus– What is learned during this event is important
• We can influence that• Focus on process of change
![Page 42: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
I think ACT adds a new how to help people contact feared stimuli
• Spend 4 sessions teaching psychological flexibility
Self asContext
Contact with the Present Moment
Defusion
Acceptance
Committed Action
Values
Psychological
Flexibility
![Page 43: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Things worth thinking about
• What is being taught• What your and the client’s goals are• How treatment success is defined
![Page 44: The Integration of ACT and ERP Michael Twohig Utah State University Jonathan Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b7877550346d31b8b6443/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
When might this be used
• Ethically ERP is the way to go• Component studies and recent trials suggest ACT +
ERP also makes sense• Might look at – Treatment failure – Refusal – Noncompliance– Lack of motivation– High obsession levels– “Sticky thoughts”