The ILC - Status & Plans
description
Transcript of The ILC - Status & Plans
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
1
The ILC - Status & Plans
Introduction & latest developments
The GDE
The baseline design and R&D efforts
The path to the RDR
The EGDE & summary
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
2
Status of the ILC
In August 2004, group of “Wise Men”, chaired by B. Barish,chose the “cold”, superconducting, RF technology over thecompeting “warm” X-band RF.
Despite the fact that both US and Asian research had been in warm technology, both regions accepted the decision andunited behind cold technology; now, transition is complete.
ICFA moved ahead quickly to appoint a Global DesignEffort (GDE) to transform the technology decision into afull Technical Design Report, capable of being presented toworld governments for a decision to construct.
B. Barish appointed as GDE director, with three regionaldirectors:BF (Europe), F. Takasaki (Asia), G. Dugan (Americas)
M. Nozaki
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
3
Status of the ILCAt end of April, EPP2010 panel produced its report. Thisconcluded that it was very important that the US regained itsleading position in particle physics, under clear threat withthe closure of all US domestic pp accelerators by end of thedecade. It gave a ringing endorsement for the ILC strategy,requested increased US investment in the R&D for both machine and detector and gave strong support for the US bidding to host the machine. The CERN Strategy group met last week in Zeuthen.Although its conclusions remain confidential, I believethat the current draft document to be submitted to thespecial CERN Council Session in July contains a strongendorsement of the ILC and a recommendation thatEurope, and CERN, are strongly involved in it throughthe GDE.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
4
GDE mission
Currently GDE is 64 strong :Americas - 22;Asia - 18;Europe - 24; corresponding to ~ 30 FTEs.
• Produce a design for the ILC that includes a detailed design concept, performance assessments, reliable international costing, an industrialization plan , siting analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope.
• Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.)
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
5
ILC Parameters
• Ecm adjustable from 200 – 500 GeV
• Luminosity ∫Ldt = 500 fb-1 in 4 years
• Ability to scan between 200 and 500 GeV
• Energy stability and precision below 0.1%
• Electron polarization of at least 80%
• The machine must be upgradeable to 1 TeV
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
6
BCD overview
Baseline Design completed in December 2005 overseen by Executive: Directors + T. Raubenheimer, N. Walker, K. Yokoya.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
7
Energy Upgrade
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
8
MAC report
Generally they were very positive and impressed by the scale of the progress that has been made. They had concerns aboutthe current accelerating gradient spec. and how R&D could be done to achieve it, about communications with the experimenters and also about coordination of world-wide R&D.
The first meeting of the Machine AdvisoryCommittee, which reports to ILCSC, tookplace last month in Fermilab & examined theBCD.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
9
BCD & AC cavities What knobs do we have to turn?
Relative
Cost
Gradient MV/m
2
0
$ lincryo
a Gb
G Q≈ +
C. Adolphsen (SLAC)
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
10
Cavity performance
Somewhat inconsistent
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
11
ILC Cryomodule
Increasediameter beyond X-FEL
Increasediameter beyond X-FEL
Review 2-phase pipe size and effect of slope
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
12
Klystron Fabrication Several suppliers for BCD:
But none meet performance requirements -may need to go to 5 MW.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
13
Test facilities
TTF exists at DESY, SMTF (FNAL), STF (KEK):
Stimulate SCindustry in theregions -collaborate onSC technology
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
14
Next steps for GDE
BCD is “complete”. In the next phase, RDR will take forward the BCD, refine thedesign and in particular gather industrialisation data in order to form the basis for reliable cost estimate with the RDR.
There are 3 new boards: Change ControlBoard; Global R&D Board; Design & CostBoard.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
15
Next steps ICFA FALC
FALC Resource Board
ILCSC
GDEDirectorate
GDEExecutive Committee
GlobalR&D Program
RDR Design Matrix
GDEChange Control Board
GDEDesign Cost Board
GDER & D Board
MAC
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
16
Change control The board has overseen the consolidation of the baseline design and the production of aWord document containing all information. Dealing with requests for changes to baseline as further work and R&D is completed. Careful methodology developed - categorisethe importance of the change, assignnumber of board members to review itdepending on importance. During process, all GDE members can comment on proposed change. Dealing with~ 1 request/week.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
17
Other boards Design & cost board produced a (very)detailed programme of work to lead ustowards the most important RDR deliverable- a believable, robust and affordable costing; a preliminary, non-public version will be available by the summer Vancouver meeting.
R&D board has to try to impose a structureand discipline on inherently chaotic system- R&D - eliminating wasteful duplication while preserving & enhancing necessary duplication.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
18
R&D board
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
19
R&D board
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
20
R&D board
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
21
R&D issues
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
22
Next steps for GDE The RDR will be produced using a matrixstructure of “area systems” and “technicalsystems” to account for the project structure.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
23
Next steps for GDE The WBS
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
24
Next steps
The meetings are going well and detailedprogress is being made.
The day-to-day work of constructing theRDR is supervised by an RDR boardchaired by N. Walker (DESY) which meets every week by telephone and reports tothe ILC Executive Committee.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
25
European GDE
European GDE meets about every 6 months. Discusses obviously regional issues:- how to get more resources from inside Europe, in particular the EU;- regional outreach - Europe has particulardifficulties & challenges here.
The European GDE does NOT discuss thetechnical issues of the BCD or take up European positions on them - these arematters for the full GDE.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
26
European GDE
European Outreach group re-established atOrsay meeting in January. B. Warmbein joined the team recently as PA to EGDE director, based at DESY. Meeting held inDESY just before Easter.
EGDE director’s advisory group also meetsregularly.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
27
European GDE Yesterday evening we had an EGDE meeting in DESY to discuss the shape of the EU FP7 proposal. We heard about European cryogenic RF development centre to be citedat CERN, about possible continuation of some current FP6 activities, the use of HERA as a prototype damping ring, etc.
ELAN/EuroTeV Meeting at Orsay next Mon-Weds will also discuss these ideas. Goal to have an action plan & outline strategy in next few weeks.
GDE Plan & Schedule
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Global Design Effort Project
Baseline configuration
Reference Design
ILC R&D Program
Technical Design
Bids to Host; Site Selection;
International Mgmt
LHCPhysics; CLIC
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
29
Next steps Jan July Dec
Freeze ConfigurationOrganize for RDR
Bangalore
Review Design/Cost Methodology
Review InitialDesign / Cost Review Final
Design / CostRDR Document
Design and Costing PreliminaryRDR
Released
Frascati Vancouver Valencia
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06
30
Summary
The ILC is making excellent progress and the GDE is well established.
Producing the RDR & the cost estimate by theend of the year is going to be very tough - weneed all the help & expertise that we can get.
This is a very exciting and challenging enterprise that is vital for the future of world particle physics.