The High Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory and its...
Transcript of The High Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory and its...
The High Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory and its first results
Dmitry Zaborov (Pennsylvania State University)for the HAWC collaboration
‣ HAWC
‣ HAWC science
‣ First results
Rencontres du VietnamQuy Nhon, VietnamAugust 11-17, 2013
Gamma-Ray ObservatoryGamma-Ray Observatory
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
HAWC - High Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory
2
location: saddle point between Volcán Sierra Negra (also site of Large
Millimeter Telescope) and Pico de Orizaba
Pico de OrizabaN 18º59'48", W 97 18'34"altitude: 4100 m
Collaboration of ~100 scientists from US & Mexico
7.3 m dia x 4.5 m tall
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Operation principle
3
Extended Air Shower
secondary particles reach ground level
charged particles produce Cherenkov light in HAWC tanks
light is detected by photomultiplier tubes (PMT)
gamma ray or cosmic ray
first interaction
4 upward looking PMTs per tank: three 8” PMTs (Hamamatsu R5912, re-used from Milagro) and
one high quantum efficiency 10” PMT in the
center (Hamamatsu R7081-MOD)
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Physics goals
• Particle acceleration in astrophysical sources
• What astrophysical sources accelerate particles?
• How do astrophysical sources accelerate particles?
• What new high energy physics can we learn from astrophysics?
• Solar and galactic cosmic rays
• Forbush Decreases, Solar Energetic Particles
• Cosmic Ray anisotropy
• Diffuse emission from the Galactic plane and other extended sources
• Search for Dark Matter (WIMPs) and other Physics Beyond the Standard Model (Q-balls, primordial black holes, Lorentz invariance violation, ...)
4
Artist’s Conception (NASA)
Crab, Chandra
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
log(E/GeV) 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
)2 (m
trig
eff
A
1
10
210
310
410
510
Angular Bins) > 0.91.0 > cos() > 0.80.9 > cos() > 0.70.8 > cos() > 0.60.7 > cos(Fermi LAT
(0.8 m2)
Detector layout and effective area
• Effective area up to ~105 m2 in multi-TeV regime
• Energy threshold ~30 GeV
• >100 m2 at 100 GeV
5
Nhit > 30; Angular error < 1.1º; No hadron rejection cut applied
HAWC-300
10 GeV 100 GeV 1 TeV
• 300 water Cherenkov detectors (“tanks”)
• ~20,000 m2 area
• >60% active Cherenkov volume
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Angular resolution and gamma-hadron separation
• Reconstruct shower core position from hit amplitudes and shower plane / direction from hit timing
• Angular resolution up to 0.1º at TeV energies
6
HAWC-300opt. bin
68% containmentHAWC-300gamma
hadron• Gamma-hadron separation is based
on shower lateral size, clumpiness, and high amplitude pulses produced by muons
• > 100-fold hadron rejection while retaining >50% of photon-induced events
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Sensitivity to Crab-like point sources
• Long integration times lead to excellent sensitivity at highest energies (> few TeV)
• 5σ sensitivity to: 10 Crab in 3 min 1 Crab in 1 transit 0.1 Crab in 1/3 year
7
HAWC source transit 15º off zenith (?)
IACT: 50 hr on-source ==> ~ 15 sources / yr
• 15x Milagro sensitivity
• Lower energy threshold
• Better angular resolution
• Better rejection of cosmic rays
Sensitivity of the High Altitude Water Cherenkov Detector to Sources of Multi-TeV Gamma Rays, by HAWC collaboration, Accepted to Astropart. Phys.
The world’s most sensitive wide-field-of-view high energy gamma-ray instrument
10 TeV
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Observable sky
• Survey of a large fraction of the sky (look for the unknown)• Measure the highest energy emission (where long exposure is essential)• Observe larger objects (nearby supernova remnants & pulsar wind nebulae, Galactic disk)• Observe transient events (gamma-ray bursts, flares from active galactic nuclei)
8
Wide field of viewlimited by atmospheric
depth (~45º from zenith)
instantaneous filed of view ~ 2 sr
Daily observation of ~8 sr(2/3 of the sky)
50 mCrab survey in 1 yr
Wide field of view provides several advantages:
* sensitivity contours are for E-2 spectrum
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
HAWC construction progress
• Sep 2012: first 29 tanks completed; regular data taking begins
• January-March 2013: high QE PMTs added
• mid-May: 77 tanks operational
• June: >90% uptime reached (automatic running)
• Now: operating with 111 tanks / 400 PMTs
• summer 2014: expect complete detector
9
HAWC-30
HAWC-77
HAWC-111
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
April 2013 Forbush decrease
10
A. Lara et al., HAWC and Solar Energetic Transient Events, ICRC 2013
cutoff rigidity for vertically incident protons at HAWC is 7.9 GV; Athens, Hermanus and Tsumeb sites have cutoofs at 8.5, 4.5 and 8.9 GV respectively
HAWC will also detect solar energetic particles known as Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs)
each channel was corrected for barometric pressure and temperature variations
HAWC will routinely observe Forbush Decreases (the effect of Coronal Mass Ejections on galactic cosmic rays)
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Small scale Cosmic Ray anisotropy
11
S. BenZvi et al., Observation of the Anisotropy of Cosmic Rays with HAWC, ICRC 2013
2 hr integration window, 10 deg smoothing appliedmedian energy the event sample ~ 2 TeV
95 days live
> 5 sigma excess regionA confirmation of CR anisotropy regions discovered by Milagro
(PRL 101:221101, 2008)
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Large scale cosmic ray anisotropy
12
Note: not a sky map, but a series of 3‐term harmonic fits within 18 declination bands
95 days live (Jan 1 - Apr 15)21 billion events
median energy 2 TeV
S. BenZvi et al., Observation of the Anisotropy of Cosmic Rays with HAWC, ICRC 2013
Using the forward-backward technique (A.A. Abdo et al., Astrophys. J., 2009, 698: 2121)
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Moon shadow
13
7 billion shower events (cut at > 31 PMTs hit)
2 degree smoothing used (HAWC-30 angular resolution is ~1.2 deg at 3 TeV)
observed peak significance: -15.6 σ
centered at 179.6 ± 0.1, 0.0 ± 0.1 deg (moon-centered equatorial coordinate
system)
blocked flux in a 5 degree radius circle is 0.255% (0.25 % expected)
Shadow RMS width is 1.6 ± 0.1 deg(consistent with expectation)
Oct 22, 2012 - April 11, 2013 (131 day live)
D. Fiorino, et al., Observation of the Moon Shadow and Characterization of the Point Response of HAWC-30, ICRC 2013
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Sun shadow
• Analysis in progress (similar to the moon shadow analysis)
• 8.5 billion events
• Observed significance: -6.4 σ
• Consistent with expectations for near the Solar maximum
14
Work by D. Fiorino and Segev BenZvi (UW-Madison)
Preli
minary
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
First look at the Crab
15
For analysis details see J. Braun, B. Baughman et al., HAWC Observations of the Crab Nebula, ICRC 2013
Analysis in progress
Crab (Dec +22 deg) transits near zenith and is observed 5-6 hr per day
A subset of data from HAWC-95 shown (online reconstruction using 95 tanks)
4.8 σ in the vicinity of the Crab position
Full calibrations are still to be incorporated
Data show evidence of gamma rays. Further analysis in progress
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
GRB 130427A
• Brightest GRB detected in 30 years (2 x 10-3 erg/cm2)
• Highest energy photon ever recorded from a GRB - 94 GeV
• low redshift (0.34)
• zenith angle at HAWC = 57º and setting (very bad)
• HAWC main DAQ was off, but PMT rates were recorded by the scalers DAQ
16
summed PMT rate and moving average
6 different time windows examined, no excess found
(GCN circular 14549)
D. Lennarz et al., Sensitivity of the HAWC Observatory to Gamma-ray Bursts Using the Scaler System, ICRC 2013
would be seen at ~5σ if it happened near zenith
?
Fermi-LAT
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
GRB 130504C
• A high fluence GRB detected by Fermi LAT (also by Fermi GBM and Swift XRT)
• LAT detected > 70 photons above 100 MeV (GCN circular 14574)
• highest energy LAT photon ~ 5 GeV
• Zenith angle at HAWC: 30º
• HAWC was taking data with 28 tanks
• No excess observed in HAWC
17
E (keV)10 210 310 410 510 610 710 810 910
)2 d
N/d
E (e
rg /
cm2 E
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
GRB 130504C
preliminaryt = 105 s!
Konus-Wind
)"HAWC-30 (5
* HAWC limit shows the flux level corresponding to 50% probability of 5 σ detection* Fermi LLE (LAT low energy) spectral analysis was not available at this time
HAWC-30 effective area exceeds Fermi LAT’s above 25 GeV Fermi LAT
25 GeV
HAWC-30
K. Sparks et al., Search for high energy emission from GRBs with the HAWC Observatory, ICRC 2013Also see Astropart. Phys. 35 (2012) 641-650.
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Summary
• HAWC is a new generation wide-field-of-view gamma-ray telescope
• With a >10000 m2 effective area, HAWC will provide an unbiased high resolution (~0.1º) survey of ~2/3of the TeV sky, including regions of diffuse emission and large extended sources
• High duty cycle, long exposure and advanced gamma-hadron separation will lead to a world-largest sample of >10 TeV gamma rays
• HAWC is on watch for gamma-ray transients such as GRB and AGN flares and will send alerts to the community
• HAWC science also includes searches for Dark Matter, Q-balls, primordial black holes, Lorentz invariance violation and more
• HAWC will also study Solar transient events - Forbush decreases and ground level enhancements
18
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 1819
Thank you for your attention!(backup slides follow)
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Mrk 421 flare - April 2013
• Brightest known flare from Mk 421
• up to 10 Crab
• Seen by NuSTAR, SWIFT, Fermi, VERITAS, MAGIC
• HAWC was taking data
20
April 11-12
-0.2 sigma
April 13-141.5 sigma
April 12-132 sigma
April 14-153.3 sigma
Analysis in progress
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Limits on Segue I Dark Matter
21
B. Baughman et al., Limits on Indirect Detection of WIMPs with the HAWC Observatory, ICRC 2013
HAWC-300 sensitivity
HAWC-30 limit
VERITAS
Fermi LAT
HAWC-30 provides best limits available above 20 TeV
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Milagro CR anysitropy
22
median energy ~ 10 TeV
HAWC sees the same regions of excess (Milagro regions A and B)
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
GRB analysis using air shower data
• Triggered search using Fermi GBM and Swift catalogs - 12 GRBs in HAWC FoV analyzed
• 4° angular bin radius
• Time windows: T90 and 3×T90
• no gamma-hadron separation
• Estimate background from off-time data
• Count events in search bin
• Keep blind if within 5 sigma from the background estimate
• a more sensitive likelihood analysis is being developed
23
time, s-10000 -5000 0 5000 10000
even
ts /
time
bin
8800
9000
9200
9400
9600
9800
10000
10200
on source event ratean illustration of the analysis technique
HAWC-30 is ~10x less sensitive than HAWC-300
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Background estimation
24
During time interval (0, T) follow the source at RA, DecDuring time interval (T, 2T) follow imaginary source at RA+T, Dec
Due to difference between solar day and time interval of 60 s corresponds to 60 * 24 / 23.9344699 = 60.0164 angular seconds
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Spectral Index-3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1
)-1
s-2
dN
/dE
at 1
0 G
eV (e
rg c
m2 E
-1010
-910
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310
30 GeV
60 GeV100 GeV
300 GeV1 TeV10 TeV
GRB090510GRB090902B
Sensitivity to transients (air shower analysis)
25
* Correlated noise from simultaneous hadronic showers
not included in simulation
trigger: Nhit > 30
Simulated GRB:T = 1 s
zenith = 20 deg
Power law spectrumwith Heaviside cutoff
The cutoff is intended to mimic either an intrinsic or an EBL absorption cutoff
Brightest GRBs detected by Fermi should be observablewith 5 sigma significance if cutoff is above ~50 GeV
For details see Astropart. Phys. 35 (2012) 641-650.
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Sensitivity to transients (Scaler DAQ)
• Scaler DAQ measures PMT rates
• GRB produces simultaneous increase of PMT counting rates
• Sudden increase in PMT counting rates may reveal a GRB
26
sensitivity down to a few GeV
For details seeOn the sensitivity of the HAWC observatory to gamma-ray bursts, by HAWC Collaboration, Astropart.Phys. 35 (2012) 641-650. Also arXiv:1108.6034 [astro-ph.HE].
Spectral Index-3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1
)-1
/2 s
-2 (e
rg c
m10
GeV
N/d
Edt |
2
dT
2 E
-810
-710
-610
-510
-41010 GeV
30 GeV
100 GeV
1 TeV10 TeV
) > 0.9 cos(HAWC-300, 1.0
GRB080916C
GRB090510
GRB090902B
Scaler analysis complements the main DAQ analysis,covering short GRBs with soft spectra and cutoffs <100 GeV
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
)°Zenith Angle (0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
)-1
s-2
dN
/dE
(erg
cm
2 E
-710
-610
-510 > 70190nHit
> 30190nHit
Sensitivity vs. zenith angle (main DAQ)
27
Simulated GRB:duration = 20 secondsspectral index = 2redshift = 0.5 (EBL absorption following Gilmore et al.)
Relatively background-free analysis due to narrow time window (duration of GRB) --> Angular resolution and gamma-hadron separation performance not critical
HAWC-300
Shown is the flux detectable at 5 sigma significance with 50% probability
Number of events in the time window (20 s) is examined
discovery potential
)cos(0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1
Rat
e in
circ
ular
bin
(Hz)
-310
-210
-110
1
10
angular bin°nHit > 30, 1.1
angular bin°nHit > 70, 0.8
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Duration (s)-210 -110 1 10 210 310
)-1
s-2
dN
/dE
at 1
0 G
eV (e
rg c
m2 E
-1110
-1010
-910
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310
HAWC
Fermi LAT scalers z=0
scalers z=1.0
scalers z=2.0
z = 0
z = 0.3
z = 1.0
z = 2.0
spectrum-1.6E
GRB 090510
Sensitivity vs. duration
28
Redshift is modeled according to Gilmore et al.
No intrinsic spectral cutoff
Fermi LAT curve: 1 photon above 10 GeV
HAWC scalers are background dominated
(sensitivity ~ 1 / sqrt(T))
Fermi LAT is essentially “background free” (sensitivity ~ 1 / T)
Above 10 GeV HAWC’s sensitivity will be comparable to Fermi LAT’s
For details see Astropart. Phys. 35 (2012) 641-650. Also arXiv:1108.6034 [astro-ph.HE]
high energy GRB detections would provide information on the acceleration mechanism of GRB or probe the extra-
galactic background light
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
EBL absorption
29
e+
e-
~eV γ
~TeV γ
P. Gorham
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Sensitivity to Q-balls (very preliminary)
30
P. Karn et al., Searching for Q-balls with the High Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory, ICRC 2013
Aiming at world-best sensitivity at 1000 mb
A dedicated Q-ball trigger is already part of the online system
Q-Ball Cross Section [mb]1 10 210 310 410 510 610 710
]-1
s-1
sr
-2Q
-Bal
l Flu
x [c
m
-1710
-1610
-1510
-1410
-1310
-1210Super-Kamiokande II
=900 km/sqvAMANDA ThesisMACRO MonopolesHAWC 300 Preliminary
24Q-Ball with Q=10 = 1 TeVSusyM = 10 TeVSusyM
Laine & Shaposhnikov (1998)
• Hypothetical particle - massive condensate of scalar fields formed at end of inflationary period - predicted in supersymmetric theories
• Enormous baryon number (Q>1016)
• signal in HAWC: subrelativistic (~220 km/s) particle that dissociate nuclei, producing a series of localized energy deposition (~16 GeV / per interaction)
• 30 microsecond burst of lightQ-ball track direction can be reconstructed if multiple interactions are detected ==> directional dark matter detector
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Upper limits on GRB 111016B
• A high fluence GRB discovered by IPN
• VAMOS zenith angle = 32 deg
• 3 time windows examined, no excess found
• Cuts used: number of hits >= 14; 6 degree radius circle around GRB position
• 90% C.L. limit in two energy bands are reported
• Results from scalers analysis are also shown (three energy bands)
31
log(E / GeV)-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
)2 d
N/d
E (e
rg /
cm2 E
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
VAMOS upper limitpreliminary
Konus-Wind
t = 155 s!
Main DAQ
Scaler DAQ
D. Zaborov for the HAWC collaboration, The HAWC observatory as a GRB detector, proceedings of the 4th Fermi symposium, Monterey, CA, 28 Oct - 2 Nov 2012, arXiv:1303.1564 [astro-ph.HE]
First GRB limit from VAMOS!
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Upper limits on GRB 120328B
• Very bright (1.2 x 10-4 erg/cm2) GRB discovered by IPN
• Observed by Fermi, Konus-Wind, MESSENGER (GRNS), INTEGRAL (SPI-ACS), Swift-BAT (outside coded field of view) and AGILE (MCAL)
• Emission was seen up to ~8 MeV by Konus-Wind
• Fermi LAT reported 8 sigma excess using non-standard analysis (burst was 66 degrees off axis and zenith angle was 105 deg meaning high Earth limb background)
• VAMOS zenith angle 41 deg
• 7 time windows examined, no significant excess found
32
E (keV)10 210 310 410 510 610 710 810 910
)2 d
N/dE
(erg
/ cm
2 E
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
GRB 120328bpreliminary
VAMOS limit 30 sKonus-Wind 50 sFermi GBM 30 s (GCN)
Weak limits due to unfavorable zenith angle (41 deg) and a
positive fluctuation observed
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
Energy resolution
• Uncertainty from two sources:
• Measurement of energydeposited at ground level
• Fluctuations in showerdevelopment in atmosphere(naturally log-normal)
• Higher elevation means HAWC has a big advantage over Milagro
33
Resolutions are log-normal:50% resolution indicates 1σ range [.67,1.5] times measured value
1TeV 10 TeV
Milagro
HAWC
including EASlongitudinalfluctuations
detector effects only
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
HAWC data
34
All distributions are in fair agreement with Monte
Carlo expectations
• This event:
• Recorded on June 12
• 95 Tanks
• 341 PMTs
• Color scale indicates timing
D. Zaborov, The HAWC observatory and its first results14 August 2013 / 18
“Triggerless" DAQ• TDCs synchronized by
common 40 MHz clock
• Continuous acquisition with common 40 kHz trigger (25 μs data blocks)
• Each TDC is read out by a VME single-board computer (SBC)
• DAQ records ALL photoelectrons from ALL 1200 PMTs " = 500 MB/sec
• Sets of 1000 data blocks pushed to processing clients over Ethernet and merged with those from other TDCs
• Triggering is done entirely in software (requires ~10% of ~200 CPU cores on-site)
• Software Trigger reduces data to 20 MB/sec (600 TB/yr)
• A second DAQ - “scalers” - measures PMT rates
35
the online processing system nominally includes 4 “big” servers (176 CPU cores in total)
Online Processing System(Computers & Software)
VM
E B
ackp
lane
VM
E B
ackp
lane
Front EndBoards
CAENV1190TDC
128 Chan
ReadoutComputer
Trigger andReconstruction
Client
Front EndBoards
CAENV1190TDC
128 Chan
ReadoutComputer
Trigger andReconstruction
Client
Trigger andReconstruction
Client
Trigger andReconstruction
Client
Eve
nt S
ortin
g, A
naly
sis,
M
onito
ring
Control / Timing / Trigger
Signal Distrubution Gb/s Ethernet
TDC DAQ (Electronics)A
naly
sis
Clie
nt
Ana
lysi
s C
lient