Hague Conference on Private International Law KÄSIRAAMAT ...
The Hague Conference on Private International Law … HccH.pdfThe Hague Conference on Private...
Transcript of The Hague Conference on Private International Law … HccH.pdfThe Hague Conference on Private...
The Hague Conference onPrivate International Law
(HCCH)
8 May 2014
Christophe BernasconiSecretary General
Hague Conference on Private International Law
Why HCCH…?
Slide 2
The Hague Conference on Private International Law
La Conférence de La Haye de droit international privé
Slide 3
The Hague Conference on Private International Law
La Conférence de La Haye de droit international privé
(HC + CH = HCCH)
Slide 4
◦ An intergovernmental organisation the origin of which goes back to 1893
◦ The oldest international organisation in The Hague, the “international city of peace and justice”
◦ The only international organisation in The Hague with a legislative function (i.e., not a court or tribunal)
◦ “World organisation for cross-border co-operation in civil and commercial matters”
What is the HCCH?
Slide 5
◦ The purpose of HCCH is to “work for the progressive unification of the rules of private international law”
◦ The work of HCCH addresses private law problems arising among individuals or companiesin situations connected withmore than one State
What does the HCCH do?
Cross-border family relation
Cross-border business deal
Cross-border legal procedure
JURISDICTION APPLICABLE LAW
RECOGNITION & ENFORCEMENT
LEGAL CO-OPERATION
Slide 6
◦ By developing international treaties known as the “Hague Conventions”
• 38 Hague Conventions have been concluded
• The Hague Conventions are open to all States (even those that are not Members of the organisation)
• The Hague Conventions co-exist with existing bilateral and regional instruments
◦ Hague Conventions do not harmonise substantive law – instead, they provide ‘road signs’ showing the way in cross-border situations or establish a framework for cross-border cooperation among States
How does the HCCH do it?
Slide 7
Post-Convention services
◦ The Hague Conference has been a pioneer in developing methods to support the continued operation of its Conventions
Slide 8
PROMOTION
IMPLEMENTATION
MONITORING AND REVIEW OF PRACTICAL OPERATION
HCCH Members
76 Members (75 States and the European Union)
Slide 9
Admitted StateMember State
Candidate State
HCCH Members
76 Members (75 States and the European Union)
BUT…
Slide 10
Connected States
144 States are “connected” to the HCCH
Slide 11
Member of the Hague Conference
Non-Member State that is a Contracting State or signatory to at least one Hague Convention or State in the process of becoming a Member
Regional presence
Latin AmericaRegional Office in Buenos Aires(commenced operations in 2005)
Permanent Bureauin The Hague
Asia PacificRegional Office in Hong Kong(opened in December 2012)
Slide 12
Giving effect to Human Rights
◦ 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
Article 9 UNCRCChildren whose parents do not live together have the right to stay in contact with both parents, except where contrary to the child’s best interests
Article 11 UNCRCStates Parties shall take measures to combat the illicit transfer and non-return of children abroad (promotes conclusion of bilateral or multilateral agreements or accession to existing agreements)
Article 21 UNCRCFor adoption, the best interests of the child shall be the paramount consideration (promotes conclusion of bilateral or multilateral agreements, which ensure that the placement of the child in another country is carried out by competent authorities)
Article 27(4) UNCRCStates Parties shall take all appropriate measures to secure the recovery of maintenance for the child (promotes accession to international instruments or the conclusion of such agreements)
Article 35 UNCRCStates Parties shall prevent abduction of, sale of, or traffic in children (requiring all appropriate national, bilateral and multilateral measures to be taken)
Child Abduction & Child Protection Conventions
Child Abduction Convention
Adoption Convention
Child Abduction & Adoption Conventions
Child Support Convention
Slide 13
◦ Choice of law in international contracts
◦ Judgments Project
◦ Parentage/Surrogacy Project
◦ Recognition and enforcement of agreements reached in the course of international child disputes
◦ Recognition and enforcement of foreign civil protection orders
Ongoing legislative work
Slide 14
The HCCH and the 1980 Convention on
the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
Slide 15
92 Contracting States
Slide 16
New Contracting States in 2014: Japan & Iraq
Continuous growth in the number of Contracting States
Slide 17
The role of the Permanent Bureau -Promote the Convention
◦ Encourage and support States to join and prepare implementing legislation
• Mentoring Programme / Twinning arrangements
• Implementation checklists
◦ Build trust in order to favour acceptances of accession
• Country Profiles
• Questionnaire for newly acceding States
◦ Build bridges between different legal cultures
• Malta Process
◦ Dialogue with practitioners
• Development of the Convention
• Identification of new challenges and trends
• Invitation to contribute to the work of the HCCH
◦ Diplomacy & Technical Assistance work!
Slide 18
The role of the Permanent Bureau -Provide information to the public
◦ Guides to Good Practice and Practical Handbooks
• Part I – Central Authority Practice
• Part II – Implementing Measures
• Part III – Preventive Measures
• Part IV – Enforcement
• Mediation
◦ Judges’ Newsletter
◦ INCADAT, the InternationalChild Abduction Database
Slide 19
Statistics (2008)Overall outcomes
◦ Majority of applications do not lead to a court ruling (56% in 2008)
◦ Minority of applications end in a judicial refusal to order the return of the child (15% in 2008)
Slide 20
18%
32%
11%
14%
22%
29%
13%
15%
19%
27%
15%
18%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Voluntary return Judicial return Judicial refusal Withdrawn
1999
2003
2008
Statistics (2008)Timing
◦ Longer time periods to process applications
◦ Voluntary returns are fastest process
Slide 21The mean number of days taken to reach a final conclusion
Statistics (recent developments)
◦ US Statistics 2013 (for Hague Proceedings)
• 362 voluntary returns, 217 judicial return orders, 160 judicial refusals
• Unresolved Return Applications remain stable, with a positive trend (118 in 2012, 112 in 2013, 111 in 2014)
• Countries Not Compliant, with Patterns of Non-Compliance or Enforcement Concerns have dropped from 12 in 2012 to 11 in 2013 and 8 in 2014
◦ Quebec Statistics 2013
• 7 voluntary returns, 2 judicial return orders, no judicial refusal
◦ Germany Statistics 2012
• 53 voluntary returns, 15 judicial return orders, 6 judicial refusals
Slide 22
The Convention before highest Courts (selection)
◦ ECtHR Grand Chamber decision Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland (6 July 2010) on the need of “an in-depth examination of the entire family situation and of a whole series of factors” (§139)
◦ ECtHR Grand Chamber decision X v. Latvia (26 November 2013) emphasises the complementarities between the ECHR and the 1980 Convention
• “in the area of international child abduction the obligations imposed by Article 8 on the Contracting States must be interpreted in the light of the requirements of the Hague Convention” (§ 93)
• “the Court considers it opportune to clarify that its finding in paragraph 139 of the Neulinger and Shuruk judgment does not in itself set out any principle for the application of the Hague Convention by the domestic courts” (§ 105)
◦ U.S. Supreme Court applies the Convention in a way that ensures international consistency in interpreting the Convention
• Abbott v. Abbott (17 May 2010)
• Chafin v. Chafin (19 February 2013)
• Lozano v. Alvarez (5 March 2014)
Slide 23
Concentration of jurisdiction
43 Contracting States with concentrated jurisdiction
Slide 24
Judicial networking and communication
International Hague Network of Judges
Slide 25
60 States and 91 Judges
Mediation in the context of the 1980 Convention
◦ The Convention encourages the amicable resolution of family disputes
◦ Central Contact Points for international family mediation in the context of the Malta Process
◦ Mediation should not delay the judicial proceedings
• The Netherlands has a well-designed mediation system with effective time targets
• In 2011, 50 % of return applications in the Netherlands went to mediation, 1/3 of mediations ended in full agreement, and 1/3 ended in partial agreement
◦ Experts’ Group on cross-border recognition and enforcement of agreements, including those obtained through mediation
Slide 26
Hot topics for next Special Commission meeting 2015/2016
◦ « Live » or « real-time » - statistics through INCASTAT
◦ Guide to Good Practice on the interpretation and application of Article 13(1)b) (the “grave risk” exception)
◦ Model travel consent form
◦ Other issues that will be identified by stakeholders, including NGOs
Slide 27