The GreenChill Advanced Refrigeration Partnership GreenChill & Natural Refrigerants.
-
Upload
luke-rodriguez -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of The GreenChill Advanced Refrigeration Partnership GreenChill & Natural Refrigerants.
The GreenChill Advanced Refrigeration Partnership
GreenChill &Natural Refrigerants
U.S. Food Retail Refrigeration
Environmental Impact 35,000,000 lbs. of supermarket
refrigerant emissions annually DX (direct expansion) systems R-22 refrigerant (at least 50% of stores) High GWP substitute refrigerants
(maybe 50% of stores)
Clean Air Act & Regulations to reduce supermarket refrigerant emissions Leak repair trigger for equipment that
leaks 35% of its charge annually
The GreenChill Advanced Refrigeration Partnership
Voluntary partnership program with food retailers to reduce their impact on the ozone layer and climate change
Measure emissions → set goals → measure again
Store Certification Program
Promoting advanced refrigeration technology, strategies, practices
GreenChill Expansion
Launched with 10 founding partners in Nov. 2007
Less than 2 years later:
46 partner companies
6533 food retail stores
47 of 50 states (+DC)
about $120 billion in sales
GreenChill Food Retail Partners
GreenChill Partner Achievements
GreenChill’s supermarket partners emit on average 12.3% of their charge (vs. 25% national average)
If every supermarket in the nation reduced refrigerant emissions down to 12.3%...
Potential greenhouse gas savings of 22,000,000 metric tons of CO2 equivalent PER YEAR
Potential to save 240 ODP tons PER YEAR
Over $108,000,000 industry savings PER YEAR
Recent Progress for Natural Refrigerants
►CO2 use as primary refrigerant – EPA’s SNAP Program
►CO2 use as secondary refrigerant►Propane use for “stand alone
commercial refrigeration equipment” is going to be found acceptable by SNAP program
►Natural refrigerant protocol being implemented for GreenChill platinum level certification
►Signs of increased interest over past few months
Price Chopper - Saratoga, NY Store
CO2 Cascade Remodel►First CO2 Cascade System in the
U.S. (low temp. only)►Positive results with the system►Low carbon footprint►Low cost of refrigerant ($.50/lb.)►Smaller line sizes►Reduced copper piping►Increased system efficiency
Price Chopper - Saratoga, NY Store
CO2 Cascade Remodel
Food Lion - Columbia, SC StoreCO2 Cascade
Food Lion - Columbia, SC StoreCO2 Cascade
Food Lion - Atlanta, GA StoreCO2 Cascade
Food Lion - Atlanta, GA StoreCO2 Cascade
Food Lion - Atlanta, GA StoreCO2 Cascade
Other Factors Affecting Acceptance
►US proposal to phase down HFC use under Montreal Protocol
►US Greenhouse Gas Legislation is expected
►Price pressure due to R-22 phaseout?
►Isobutane use is going to be found acceptable for home refrigerators and freezers by SNAP program
General Challenges
►Need application to start SNAP process
►Lack of svc. tech experience/training►Lack of data►Fear of liability, esp. for NH3 & HCs►Publicity about dangers, toxicity,
flammability►Higher costs of natural refrigerant
systems►No economies of scale yet, low volume►High prices for European equipment►No manufacturer cross over among US
manufacturers
General Challenges
►No “drop-in” retrofits available for existing systems
►Multiple layers of complicated regulations-federal, state, local, building codes, permitting
►No understanding among local officials about advantages and disadvantages of natural refrigerants
►No good guidelines for safe implementation
►Philosophical debate: stop leaks or move to low GWP refrigerant?
General Challenges
►Reluctance to change – satisfaction with chemical refrigerants►Inexpensive►Readily available►Lots of training by chemical
companies►Chemical systems are very forgiving
and safe – natural refrigeration systems require more care with system design, installation, servicing
Specific Challenges – CO2►No US manufacturer for transcritical
systems►ASHRAE has very specific language
for design pressures – US Guidelines are stringent & conservative; liability
►Trying to adapt it for cascade systems►Transcritical standards are a long way off
►No Underwriters Laboratory approval yet
►Energy penalty esp. in warmer climates
►Hard to explain difference between “good” CO2 and “bad” CO2
Specific Challenges for Natural Refrigerants -
hydrocarbons
►Not yet SNAP approved for commercial refrigeration
►Very high charges would be needed – flammability; liability
Specific Challenges for Natural Refrigerants -
Ammonia►SNAP-approved for use as primary
refrigerant in secondary loop commercial applications; no demand
►Use in industrial areas; supermarkets located in residential neighborhoods
►Must have engineer on-site 24/7/365 & process safety management plan
►Difficulties servicing equipment► Lg. industrial plants can shut down facility for inspections/maintenance
►No service tech. cross over - different education, pay levels
►Different end-user needs► Industrial systems - durable, expensive, long-term► Supermarket systems – remodeled every 10 years, short-term, cheap
For More Info
►Keilly Witman►Stratospheric Protection
Division►U.S. EPA►Tel: (202) 343-9742►[email protected]►www.epa.gov/greenchill