The Future of Management-Scott Thor
-
Upload
scott-thor -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of The Future of Management-Scott Thor
-
8/14/2019 The Future of Management-Scott Thor
1/11
Future of Management1Scott Thor BUSG 707 Executive Level Management
The Future of Management: Creating Employee Engagement
Scott Thor
George Fox University
Doctor of Management
BUSG 707 Executive Level Management
January 5, 2010
-
8/14/2019 The Future of Management-Scott Thor
2/11
-
8/14/2019 The Future of Management-Scott Thor
3/11
Future of Management3Scott Thor BUSG 707 Executive Level Management
by innovating the activity of management, resulting in strategic advantages that are
difficult to mimic by competitors.
This paper begins with a description of management innovation and how it can
create strategic advantages for organizations. The paper also describes some of the
biggest challenges facing managers of the future, and provides guidance on areas in
which managers need to innovate in order to truly capture the capability of their
workforce to ensure the future success of their organization.
Management Innovation
What is management innovation? Hamel and Breen (2007) describe
management innovation as anything that changes what managers do that enhances the
performance of an organization. Hargrave and Van de Ven (2006) add to the definition
by including the caveat that the change be novel or an unprecedented departure from
the past.
When thinking about innovation most people tend to visualize some type of
technological advancement such as the personal computer or cellular telephone.
Management and innovation have not been viewed as a combination that naturally go
together, which provides some insight into why managers traditionally do not view their
role within organizations to be innovators. Hamel and Breen (2007) also argue that most
managers view their role as the activity of doing and not dreaming.
In a world of rapid change and the availability of technological resources,
operational, product, and strategic advantages no longer provide a long-term
competitive position. Any organization with the financial resources can quickly duplicate
and/or improve upon a competitors operations, product, and strategy. What are difficult
-
8/14/2019 The Future of Management-Scott Thor
4/11
Future of Management4Scott Thor BUSG 707 Executive Level Management
to copy are the unique combinations of management innovation utilized within the
organization, which create a long-term advantage (Hamel & Breen, 2007).
Challenges for the Future of Management
Managers in the 21st century face a number of challenges. Hamel and Breen
(2007) suggest that the three most formidable challenges facing organizations in the
21st century include:
1. Dramatically accelerating the pace of strategic renewal in organizations large and
small.
2. Making innovation everyones job, every day.
3. Creating a highly engaging work environment that inspires employees to give the
very best of themselves (p. 40-41).
Change is a constant in the modern business environment. Hamel and Breen
(2007) suggest asking the question, Are we changing as fast as the world around us?
(p. 42). If not, an organization may not be changing fast enough to stay ahead of
competitors and meet the needs of customers. Hamel and Breen believe the goal for
organizations must be trauma-free renewal (p. 43).
In a world where competitive forces are much higher than in the past, a second
challenge is capturing the creativity of the workforce to be constantly looking for a better
way to stay ahead of competitors. An argument can be made that both change and
innovativeness will be difficult in an environment where employees are not engaged in
their work, which is perhaps the most significant opportunity for managers to innovate.
-
8/14/2019 The Future of Management-Scott Thor
5/11
Future of Management5Scott Thor BUSG 707 Executive Level Management
Employee Engagement
What is an engaged employee? How does one define engagement? No single
definition of engagement exists, but several authors, researchers, and consulting
organizations have offered definitions to describe engagement.
Harter, Schmidt, and Hayes (2002) define employee engagement as, the
individuals involvement and satisfaction with as well as enthusiasm for work
(p. 269).
Wellins and Concelman (2004) describe employee engagement as, the illusive
force that motivates employees to higher levels of performance (p. 1).
Towers and Perrin (2003) define engagement as, employees willingness and
ability to contribute to company success (p. 2).
No matter how you define it, engaged employees care about the organization
and are driven to perform. The challenge facing the future of management is creating an
environment that fosters engagement, and recruiting employees who have a high
probability of becoming engaged in the organizations environment.
Engaged Employees Lead to Results
Research conducted by Gallup Consulting (2008) and Towers Perrin (2003,
2007) came to similar conclusions in measuring employee engagement. Gallup
research data suggest that only 30 percent of employees are engaged, 50 percent are
not engaged, and 20 percent are disengaged in their work. Towers Perrin survey data
suggest that 20 percent of workers are highly engaged, 60 percent are moderately
engaged, and 20 percent are disengaged. What is blatantly evident from both studies is
-
8/14/2019 The Future of Management-Scott Thor
6/11
-
8/14/2019 The Future of Management-Scott Thor
7/11
Future of Management7Scott Thor BUSG 707 Executive Level Management
What leads to engagement?
Towers Perrin (2007) believes that engaged employees are not born, but made
(p. 2). The environment an employee works in has a significant influence on creating
engagement, according to their research. Some of the critical elements found to
improve employee engagement include senior management taking a sincere interest in
employees well-being, being given the opportunity to improve skills and capabilities
over the past 12 months, input into decision making, career advancement opportunities,
and a good relationship with the employees direct supervisor.
Wagner and Harter (2006), in their review of Gallups research, came to similar
conclusions that include having a valued opinion, working for a supervisor who cares
about the employee, and having the opportunity to learn and grow. What is clear from
both research groups data is that managers have the ability to create an environment
that stimulates engagement.
Creating Engagement: An Opportunity to Innovate
The data on employee engagement overwhelmingly points to a significant
opportunity for managers to innovate. The traditional methods of management clearly
focus on getting things done and not on the people doing them. In some respects these
results should come as no surprise. Business as we know it has focused more on the
results of organizations and not on the individuals who they are made up of. To truly
become management innovators we will need to focus on the individuals within the
organization to tap into their adaptability, resiliency, and innovativeness that can not
only contribute to the goals of the organization, but also, and maybe more importantly,
-
8/14/2019 The Future of Management-Scott Thor
8/11
Future of Management8Scott Thor BUSG 707 Executive Level Management
to the sense of fulfillment of individuals within the organization who come to work each
day striving to make a difference.
There is no simple algorithm that equates to increasing engagement, but data
from the study of employee engagement over the last decade provides areas in which
managers can focus their innovation efforts (Towers Perrin, 2003, 2007; Wagner &
Harter, 2006; Gallup Consulting, 2008). To begin the initiative managers should ask the
following questions to better understand opportunities to increase engagement through
innovative solutions:
How can the organization ensure all employees know what is expected of them?
How can the organization provide employees with the opportunity to do what they
do best every day?
How can the organization provide recognition and praise to employees?
How can the organization encourage the development of employees and provide
career advancement opportunities?
How can the organization make employees feel that their opinion counts, and
provide opportunities to make decisions that affect their work environment?
How can the organization ensure employees feel a connection with the mission
of the organization?
How can the organization do a better job of talking to employees about their
performance?
How can the organization provide challenging work to employees and provide
opportunities to learn and grow?
-
8/14/2019 The Future of Management-Scott Thor
9/11
Future of Management9Scott Thor BUSG 707 Executive Level Management
Discovering the answers to these questions can come in the form of a survey or
focus groups. The answers to these questions will provide an organizations leaders
with insight into how to increase employee engagement. Traditional management
techniques are not likely to be linked to the answers of these questions. To create an
engaging environment will require innovative solutions to these challenging problems
found in most organizations.
Conclusion
People make up organizations, and when given the opportunity and the
resources they can make great things happen, so it is surprising how little attention has
really been given to them throughout the history of business. If one looks back on the
history of business theory most of the focus is on processes and not people. Few
innovations are likely to be found in these processes so the time has come to focus on
the people utilizing the processes. The 21st century manager has to make a paradigm
shift from just doing to dreaming and doing. The future of management lies in
developing innovative solutions that capture the full potential of employees.
-
8/14/2019 The Future of Management-Scott Thor
10/11
Future of Management10Scott Thor BUSG 707 Executive Level Management
References
Fayol, H. (1930). Industrial and general administration. Geneva: International
Management Institute.
Gallup Consulting (2008). Employee engagement: Whats your employee engagement
ratio. Retrieved November 26, 2009, from
http://www.gallup.com/consulting/File/121535/Employee_Engagement_Overview
_Brochure.pdf
Hamel, G. & Breen, B. (2007). The future of management. Boston, MA: Harvard
Business School Publishing.
Hargrave, T. & Van de Ven, A. (2006). A collective action model of institutional
innovation.Academy of Management Review, 31, 864-888.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship
between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes:
A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
Towers Perrin HR Services (2003). Working today: Understanding what drive employee
engagement. Retrieved November 10, 2009, from http://tinyurl.com/ybmyx78 Towers Perrin HR Services (2007). Closing the engagement gap: A road map for driving
superior business performance. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from
http://tinyurl.com/y9mhhtj Wagner, R. & Harter, J. K. (2006). 12: The elements of great managing. New York:
Gallup Press.
-
8/14/2019 The Future of Management-Scott Thor
11/11
Future of Management11Scott Thor BUSG 707 Executive Level Management
Wellins, R. & Concelman, J. (2005). Creating a culture for engagement. Workforce
performance solutions. Retrieved November 26, 2009, from
http://tinyurl.com/ydm5ek7