The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

21
Joshua M. Scacco, PhD (@joshscacco) Assistant Professor, Purdue University Faculty Research Associate, Engaging News Project The Future of Headlines? You’ll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

Transcript of The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

Page 1: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

Joshua M. Scacco, PhD (@joshscacco)Assistant Professor, Purdue University

Faculty Research Associate, Engaging News Project

The Future of Headlines? You’ll Never Believe How People Reacted to

Clickbait

Page 2: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

ENGAGING NEWS PROJECT

To provide research-based techniques for engaging online audiences in

commercially viable and democratically beneficial ways.

Page 3: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

CLICKBAIT

Page 4: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

TRADITIONAL NEWS HEADLINES

● Overview of the main idea in an inverted pyramid-structured news story

Page 5: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

FORWARD-REFERENCE HEADLINES

● Create more uncertainty about information in a story compared to traditional headlines

Page 6: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

QUESTION-BASED HEADLINES

● Designed to create uncertainty by posing a question about information contained in a news story

Page 7: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

YOU WON’T BELIEVE WHAT WE FOUND!

•Question-based headlines lead to more negativity from audience.

•Forward-reference headlines do not lead to different reactions.

•Types of headlines and policy issues should be paired carefully.

Page 8: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

OUTCOME: REACTIONS

● Headline Reactions: (Un)civil, (Un)trustworthy, (Non)partisan, (Un)informative, boring/entertaining, (In)appropriate, confusing/clear, silly/serious, (Not) credible

● Result: Compared to traditional headlines, people had slightly more negative reactions toward the question-based headline.

Page 9: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

OUTCOME: EXPECTATIONS

● Article Expectations: Do you expect the article following this headline to be…(Un)civil, (Un)trustworthy, (Non)partisan, (Un)informative, boring/entertaining, (In)appropriate, confusing/clear?

● Result: Slightly more negative expectations of the news articles that would follow question-based headlines compared to articles that would follow traditional headlines.

Page 10: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

OUTCOME: ENGAGEMENT

● News Engagement: How likely would you be to…read the article, “Like” or “Favorite” the article via a social media site, comment in the comment section, talk to someone about the article, or pay a small fee for the article?

● Result: Question-based headlines slightly decreased anticipated engagement with the news.

Page 11: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?

1. People responded more positively overall to traditional headlines compared to question-based headlines.

2. Forward-reference headlines did not change opinions relative to traditional news headlines.

Page 12: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

HEADLINES PAIRED WITH POLICY ISSUES

To explore whether the effects of the headlines were influenced by the topic of the headline, we tested the headline types across three different topics:

- Immigration policy

- The economy

- The U.S. Congress

Page 13: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?

When the question headline was matched with Congress – which was the most negatively received topic in our study – the combination led to the most negative responses to the headline.

Page 14: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

HEADLINES IN ELECTION NEWS

Traditional Headline Clickbait Headline0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

2,941

1,665

Headline Type and Predicted Page Views

Pred

icte

d Pa

ge V

iew

s

Data from the Engaging News Project and American Press InstituteAnalysis controls for news organization, word count, federal/state race, issues mentioned, strategy

components, and hard news/opinion article

• Examining local news coverage of 2016 primary election

Page 15: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

HEADLINES IN ELECTION NEWS

• Examining local news coverage of 2016 general election

Traditional Headline Clickbait Headline0

1,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000 5,713

3,982

Headline Type and Predicted Page Views

Pred

icte

d Pa

ge V

iew

s

Data from the Engaging News Project and American Press InstituteAnalysis controls for news organization, word count, federal/state race, issues mentioned, strat-

egy components, and hard news/opinion article

Page 16: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

TRY THESE HEADLINES INSTEAD

Based on our research comparing solutions-focused and non-solutions-

focused headlines in regard to popularity, solutions-focused

headlines resulted in more clicks.

Page 17: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

SOLUTIONS HEADLINES

- Including a “mysterious” unnamed location in a headline increases the click-through rate (e.g. “This City Has a Solution to Poverty”).

- Adding the word “simple” can affect headline clicks (e.g. “A Simple Way to Address Climate Change”).

Page 18: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

SOLUTIONS HEADLINES

- Tacking solutions-oriented information onto a headline does not significantly affect the click-through rate (e.g. “This is a Problem. Here’s How to Help”).

- Adding the word “you” does not significantly influence the click-through rate (e.g. “Here’s How You Can Help Save The Rainforests”).

Page 19: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

CONCLUSION

- Headlines styled as questions led to the most negative reactions compared to traditional and forward-reference headlines, especially when paired with a topic the participants found particularly unappealing.

- Consider using different types of headlines, such as solutions headlines.

Page 20: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

OTHER ENP RESEARCH

Comment SectionsEngagement Buttons

Quizzes

Page 21: The Future of Headlines? You'll Never Believe How People Reacted to Clickbait

Questions & Comments?

/engagingnewsprojec

tengagingnewsproject.org

@engagingnews