The Formal-Informal Labor Nexus and Growth in Bangladesh · 2017. 4. 2. · The Formal-Informal...

19
The Formal-Informal Labor Nexus and Growth in Bangladesh Workshop on “Formal-Informal Labor Nexus and Bangladesh’s GrowthBangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS) Dhaka : March 28, 2017 Krishna Kumar (RAND), Minhaj Mahmud (BIGD), Shanthi Nataraj (RAND), Italo Gutierrez (RAND), Farzana Munshi (BRAC University), Prodyumna Goutam (RAND)

Transcript of The Formal-Informal Labor Nexus and Growth in Bangladesh · 2017. 4. 2. · The Formal-Informal...

  • The Formal-Informal Labor Nexus and Growth in Bangladesh

    Workshop on “Formal-Informal Labor Nexus and Bangladesh’s Growth” Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS)

    Dhaka : March 28, 2017

    Krishna Kumar (RAND), Minhaj Mahmud (BIGD), Shanthi Nataraj (RAND), Italo Gutierrez (RAND), Farzana Munshi (BRAC University),

    Prodyumna Goutam (RAND)

  • Slide 2

    We Thank the Various Organizations That Made This Research Possible

    •  UK Department for International Development (DfID), Institute for the Study of Labor, Germany, (IZA), for funding the initial study

    •  BIGD for hosting the inception workshop held in March 2015 and for help in collecting the worker survey data

    •  World Bank for funding a follow-on project, including the employer-employee survey

    •  ERG for help in collecting the employer-employee survey data •  BIDS and BIGD for hosting this workshop •  Our advisory panel: Professor Dr. Shamsul Alam, Dr. Sultan Hafeez

    Rahman, Dr. Rushidan Islam Rahman, Dr. Mustafizur Rahman, Dr. Kazi Ali Toufique

    •  Participants of the inception workshop held in March 2015 •  Kumar acknowledges additional support from the Rosenfeld Program

    on Asian Development at the Pardee RAND Graduate School

  • Slide 3

    One View of Informality Characterizes the Sector as Stagnant, Unproductive

    Source: LaPorta and Shleifer (2014)

  • Slide 4

    Per-Capita GDP Has Grown Substantially in Bangladesh

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

    100

    2002 2005 2010

    Per-C

    apita

    GD

    P (C

    onst

    ant 2

    010

    USD

    )

    Perc

    ent F

    orm

    al E

    mpl

    oym

    ent

    Formal Employment GDP

    Source: World Bank DataBank.

  • Slide 5

    But the Share of Formal Employment Has Remained Stubbornly Low

    Sources: World Bank DataBank and authors’ calculations based on Bangladesh Labour Force Surveys.

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

    100

    2002 2005 2010

    Per-C

    apita

    GD

    P (C

    onst

    ant 2

    010

    USD

    )

    Perc

    ent F

    orm

    al E

    mpl

    oym

    ent

    Formal Employment GDP

  • Slide 6

    Alternative View Characterizes Informal Sector as Dynamic

    •  Allows entrepreneurship

    •  Providing flexible work hours/locations

    •  Provides supply links to the formal sector

    •  Predicts that the informal sector will exist (maybe even thrive) as the economy develops (formal and informal labor are complements)

  • Slide 7

    Motivation for Research Agenda •  Are less productive than formal firms

    •  Pay their workers less

    •  May not give their workers the benefits to which they are entitled

    If the informal sector is here to stay, could it be an important source of growth?

    And what policies might improve conditions for informal firms and workers?

  • Slide 8

    We Addressed These Questions Through Several Approaches

    •  Analyzing the links between export-led growth and formal and informal employment, using data from the Labour Force Surveys (LFS)

    •  Examining whether workers are “locked in” to informal employment, and how much they value specific benefits of formality, through a survey of informal and formal workers

    •  Examining preferences of employers as well as employees at small, informal firms through a matched employer-employee survey

  • Slide 9

    The Inception Workshop Helped Shape Our View of Informality as a Continuum

    Safe working conditions

    Minimum wage Sick leave

    Paid holidays

    Maternity leave

    Termination notice

    Written contract Pension

    LFS Worker Survey

    Formal Regular paid employee Paid employee in private entity

    Paid employee in government

    Informal Day laborer/casual worker Day laborer/casual worker

    Seasonal worker Seasonal worker

    Domestic worker Domestic worker

    Self-employed Employer Self-employed / business owner, no employees

    Business owner, hiring only family members

    Business owner, hiring at least 1 paid worker

    Family helpers Unpaid family member Paid or unpaid family member working in a HH business

  • Slide 10

    As of 2010, 15% of Working Adults Are Formally Employed

    Population Aged 15-65 90.7 million

    Economically Active

    55.0 million

    Employed 52.8 million

    Formal (15%) 7.9 million

    Informal (23%) 12.2 million

    Family (22%) 11.8 million

    Self-Employed (41%)

    21.0 million

    Unemployed 2.2 million

    Economically Inactive

    35.7 million

    Source: Bangladesh Labour Force Survey, 2010

    Total population in 2010 149 million

  • Slide 11

    How Do Growth Opportunities Affect Formal, Informal, Family and Self Employment?

    68

    1012

    14

    Ln(F

    orm

    al e

    mpl

    oym

    ent)

    10 15 20 25Ln(BGD Exp OECD - Total)

    68

    1012

    1416

    Ln(In

    form

    al e

    mpl

    oym

    ent)

    10 15 20 25Ln(BGD Exp OECD - Total)

    68

    1012

    1416

    Ln(U

    npai

    d em

    ploy

    men

    t)

    10 15 20 25Ln(BGD Exp OECD - Total)

    68

    1012

    1416

    Ln(S

    elf e

    mpl

    oym

    ent)

    10 15 20 25Ln(BGD Exp OECD - Total)

  • Slide 12

    How Do Growth Opportunities Affect Formal, Informal, Family and Self Employment?

    68

    1012

    14

    Ln(F

    orm

    al e

    mpl

    oym

    ent)

    10 15 20 25Ln(BGD Exp OECD - Total)

    68

    1012

    1416

    Ln(In

    form

    al e

    mpl

    oym

    ent)

    10 15 20 25Ln(BGD Exp OECD - Total)

    68

    1012

    1416

    Ln(U

    npai

    d em

    ploy

    men

    t)

    10 15 20 25Ln(BGD Exp OECD - Total)

    68

    1012

    1416

    Ln(S

    elf e

    mpl

    oym

    ent)

    10 15 20 25Ln(BGD Exp OECD - Total)

    Estimated relationship between export-led growth and levels, shares of employment

  • Slide 13

    We Considered Both Direct and Indirect Effects of Export-Led Growth

    2002 2005 2010

    Export (billion, 2010 US$) 5.9 9.1 16.7

    Direct Demand (billion, 2010 US$) 6.1 9.5 17.5

    Indirect Demand (billion, 2010 US$) 7.4 10.5 20.3

    Formal Employment (million) 6.1 6.6 7.9

    Informal Employment (million) 9.5 10.1 12.5

    Unpaid Employment (million) 8.1 10.3 11.8

    Self Employment (million) 20 20 21.9

    Source: Bangladesh Labour Force Survey, 2002, 2005, 2010

    •  Used supply chain linkages to account for how export opportunities propagate through the economy

  • Slide 14

    We Then Examine Relationship Between Exports and Each Type of Employment at the Individual Level

    •  Probability of working in each type of employment as a function of total demand (direct + indirect)

    Empijt =α +βTotDemjt +γXijt +δk +εijtEmpjt = 1 if individual i is employed in sector j at time t, 0 otherwise TotDemjt = demand for goods from sector j at time t that are induced by Bangladesh exports to OECD Xijt = individual characteristics (age, gender, education) δk = control for broad sectoral effects

    •  Concern that demand for Bangladesh exports may be endogenous

    •  Use India’s exports to OECD, along with India’s IO table, as an instrument

  • Slide 15

    Formal Informal Family SelfEmployed

    Ln(TotalDemand) 0.0154 -0.0388*** 0.00647 0.0169**

    (0.0135) (0.00929) (0.00999) (0.00856)

    ObservaIons 190,685 190,685 190,685 190,685

    FirstStageF-test 31.72 31.72 31.72 31.72

    Growth is Associated with a Shift from Informal Employment to Self-Employment

    Robust standard errors in parentheses. Standard errors clustered at the consolidated IO sector level. *** p

  • Slide 16

    Formal Informal FamilySelf

    Employed

    Ln(TotalDemand)-Men 0.0140 -0.0470*** 0.0229** 0.0101

    (0.0129) (0.0105) (0.00985) (0.00912)

    Ln(TotalDemand)-Women 0.0200 -0.0107 -0.0495*** 0.0402***

    (0.0183) (0.0103) (0.0154) (0.0111)

    ObservaIons 190,685 190,685 190,685 190,685

    Women are More Likely to Move into Self-Employment…

    Robust standard errors in parentheses. Standard errors clustered at the consolidated IO sector level. *** p

  • Slide 17

    Formal Informal FamilySelf

    EmployedLn(TotalDemand)–NoClassARained 0.00175 -0.0598*** 0.0180* 0.0400***

    (0.0134) (0.00882) (0.0105) (0.00971)

    Ln(TotalDemand)–Class1-5 0.0177 -0.0368*** 0.00215 0.0169**(0.0138) (0.00872) (0.0105) (0.00833)

    Ln(TotalDemand)–Class6-9 0.0286** -0.0213** -0.00586 -0.00142(0.0141) (0.00868) (0.0108) (0.00840)

    Ln(TotalDemand)–Secondary 0.0288 -0.0124 -0.00203 -0.0143(0.0241) (0.0110) (0.0101) (0.0127)

    Ln(TotalDemand)–Graduate 0.0283 -0.00620 0.00754 -0.0297(0.0475) (0.0171) (0.00559) (0.0317)

    ObservaIons 190,685 190,685 190,685 190,685

    …As Are Less Educated Workers

    Robust standard errors in parentheses. Standard errors clustered at the consolidated IO sector level. *** p

  • Slide 18

    Discussion and Policy Implications •  Sectoral growth is associated with a decline in informal wage

    employment

    •  But also with an increase in self-employment as well as formal employment

    •  Women are particularly likely to be self-employed rather than unpaid family helpers in fast-growing sectors

    •  Those with higher levels of education are likely to move to formal employment, those with lower levels of education to self-employment

    •  Policies to aid such entrepreneurship, especially among women are likely to be helpful

    •  This analysis does not tell us whether individual workers are moving between sectors è we conducted a worker survey

  • We welcome your comments. Thank you!