The Decreasing Market Value of Variable Renewables: Integration ...
The FENIX project: Integration of Renewables and ...
16
Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1 The FENIX project: Integration of Renewables and Distributed Generation in Networks through aggregation fenix ‘… a step towards the future of fenix ‘… a step towards the future of electricity networks’
Transcript of The FENIX project: Integration of Renewables and ...
Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1
The FENIX project: Integration of Renewables and Distributed Generation in Networks through aggregation
fenix‘… a step towards the future of
electricity networks’
fenix‘… a step towards the future of
electricity networks’
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
Enabling Distributed Energy Resources (DER) to make the EU electricity supply system cost efficient, secure and sustainable through aggregation into Large Scale Virtual Power Plant (LSVPP)
Objective
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
José M. Corera – Spain Round Table RT4
• FENIX is an European collaborative project, partly funded by the European Commission within the 6th Framework Program for Research
• Launched in October 2005 and its duration is 4 years (ends September 2009)
• 20 partners are involved• The total budget is 14,7 MEuro14,7 MEuro
Project Coordinates
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
4
The Netherlands
Romania
Slovenia
AustriaGermanySpain
France
United Kingdom
Partners
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
VPP concept400 kV
VPP(G&L)
LG L
G
G
G
400kV
132kV
33kV 11kV
400 kV
P, QP, Q
=
Characteristics of aggregated active generation and load:
(1) Output (2) Reserve(3) Dynamic response (4) Cost characteristics
11 kV/0.4 kV
LV area 1 LV area 2TVPP area 1 TVPP area 2
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
6
Specification and
development
Building the demonstrations
Cost benefit analysisRegulatory recommendations
Connection & use of
distribution system
Sale of electricity /
flexible demand services
Trade
TSO Ancillary Services
Local Network Services
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
ResourceCVPPCVPP
MarketMarket
TSOTSO TAOTAO
TVPPTVPP
Use of transmission
system
Electricity
Revenue
DAODAO
Connection & use of
distribution system
Sale of electricity /
flexible demand services
Trade
TSO Ancillary Services
Local Network Services
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
ResourceCVPPCVPP
MarketMarket
TSOTSO TAOTAO
TVPPTVPP
Use of transmission
system
Electricity
Revenue
DAODAO
Sale of electricity /
flexible demand services
Trade
TSO Ancillary Services
Local Network Services
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
Resource
Distributed Energy
ResourceCVPPCVPP
MarketMarket
TSOTSO TAOTAO
TVPPTVPP
Use of transmission
system
Electricity
Revenue
Electricity
Revenue
DAODAO
Progress We are here
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
Key research challenges of Fenix1. Identify potential present (and future) contribution of DER to networks that can be
performed at advantageous cost.
2. Identify network needs and the way to satisfy them using DER
3. Revise regulations, incentive mechanisms and contractual relationships between the different participants (DER, aggregators, network operators and markets), to enhance DER contribution to the network with a fair economic return
4. Investigate aggregation (VPP) so the limited size of DER and their non-deterministic behaviour limitations can be overcome
5. Develop the ICT architecture to make it work:• At DER level: FENIX box• At VPP level: DEMS systems• At system operators: revision of EMS and DMS tools
6. Two physical demonstrations:• UK (hosted by EDF Energy)• Spain (hosted by Iberdrola)
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
Región EsteRegión MadridRegión CentroRegión NorteRegión Oeste
Demonstration
Control Centre
Bilbao
Valencia
Alicante
Toledo
Madrid
Valladolid• Area around 3.000 km2
• 169.001 Low Voltage Customers – 70% Urban– 12% Suburban– 17% Rural
• 1.234 MVA = Total Capacity– 687 MVA Installed capacity (1775 T.C.)– 547 MVA Contracted capacity (799 T.C.)
• 1.907 Km of lines– 80% aerial– 20% underground
Alava Network
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
320 MW peak demand
DER – 168 MVA Installed capacity
ANTOÑANA1,2 MW
BERGANZO1,2 MW
DSO – 30kV/13,2kV simplified network
ELGUEA
GAMARRAALI
ALSASUA
JUNDIZ
PUENTELARRA
Transformer 220/30 kV - TSO-DSO Boundary
G DER (Wind farms) MW
Capacitors MVAR
14,4 x 2 Mvar
14,4 x 2 Mvar 14,4 Mvar
5,4 x 4 Mvar
G
G
G
G
G
GUASCOR
HOSPITAL
GOJAIN MICHELIN
12 MW
2,0 MW
2,7 MW
TXAGORRITXU0,5 MW
47 MW
G
G
GENVIROIL
HOLZLAN
SEARSA
2,0 MW
1,0 MW
2,7 MW
G Small Hydro and renewable units MW
GELGUEA30 MW
GBADAIA
50 MW
GURKILLA
32 MW
13,2 kV
G
G
G
GG
G
DER (CHP) MWG
G
G
G
G
G
Transformation 30/13,2 kV
AggregatorFenix
GSALINERA7,5 MW
PV0,3MW G
TSO (REE) DSO(IBD)Market (OMEL)
Prague, 8-11 June 2009DER participants – Main challengeUnit Location MVA Connection Type
Cog. Fabrica Neumáticos Michelin Vitoria 47 Barras de 30 kV de Gamarra CHPCog. Guascor I+D P.T. Miñano 12 L 30 kV Gamarra-Villarreal 1-2 CHPCog. Hospital de Santiago Vitoria 2,06 L 30 kV Este-Oeste CHPCog. Hospital de Txagorritxu Vitoria 0,52 L 30 kV Gamarra-Peña 1 CHPCog. Kraslan P.I Jundiz 1 L 30 kV Jundiz-Ali 1-2 CHPCog. Leia BT Villarreal 0,42 L 30 kV Gamarra-Villarreal 1-2 CHPCog. Salinera Añana Añana 7,56 L 30 kV Jundiz-Puentelarra 1-2 CHPCog. Secados de Madera Goiain P.I. Goiain 2,72 L 30 kV Gamarra-Villarreal 1-2 CHPP.E. Badaia Sierra de Badaia 50 Barras de 30 kV de Jundiz WindP.E. ELGEA-URKILLA Sierra de Urkilla 32,3 Barras de 30 kV de Elgea WindCog. Searsa P.I Jundiz 2,76 L 30 kV Jundiz-Ali 1-2 CHPCog. Biometanización Vitoria 1,2 L 30 kV Jundiz-Ali 1 2 CHP-BIOMASSFotovoltaico Gamarra Menor Vitoria 0,3 L 30 kV Gamarra-Villarreal 1-2 PVFotovoltaico ULLIBARRI-ARRAZUAVitoria 0,3 L 30 kV Gamarra-Alsasua 1 PVFotovoltaico en Pobes Pobes 0,1 L 30 kV Jundiz-Puentelarra 2 PVZIGOR Vitoria 1,1 L 30 kV Gamarra-Villarreal 1-2 Back-upC.H. Araia San Pedro de A 0,96 STR ASPARRENA CTO 5 ARA HydroC.H. Santa Cruz de Campezo Santa Cruz de C 0,96 STR ANTOÑANA CTO 1 SANTA HydroCog. Fundación Estadio Vitoria 0,96 STR OLARIZU CTO 2 ARETXA CHPCog. Vertedero de Gardelegui Vitoria 0,65 STR OLARIZU CTO 1 BERGAN CHPC.H. Pedruzo Vitoria 0,7 STR OLARIZU CTO 1 BERGAN HydroC.H. Antoñana Antoñana 0,44 Barras STR ANTOÑANA HydroHuerta Solar en Legarda Legarda 0,7 STR NANCLARES CTO 3 TRES PVHuerta Solar en Treviño Treviño 0,19 STR OLARIZU CTO 1 BERGAN PVFOTOVOLTAICA en Berganzo Berganzo 0,1 STR OLARIZU CTO 1 BERGAN PVCH Contrasta Antoñana 0,2 STR ANTOÑANA CTO 1 SANTA HydroFOTOVOLTAICA VALLE DE ARANAAntoñana 0,3 STR ANTOÑANA CTO 1 SANTA PVFOTOVOLTAICA SANTA CRUZ DE Antoñana 0,1 STR ANTOÑANA CTO 1 SANTA PV
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
• Providing global services (TSO level)1- Selling active power in the day ahead market2- Tertiary reserve, balancing market 3- Selling reactive power capacity (PO7.4)
• Providing local services (DSO level)4- Help maintaining voltages in lines (use case 4 )5- Under equipment outages, use active power
generation to avoid reconfiguring the distribution network (simulated )
• Providing global services (TSO level)1- Selling active power in the day ahead market2- Tertiary reserve, balancing market 3- Selling reactive power capacity (PO7.4)
• Providing local services (DSO level)4- Help maintaining voltages in lines (use case 4 )5- Under equipment outages, use active power
generation to avoid reconfiguring the distribution network (simulated )
What is demonstrated?
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
1. Aggregating DER of different technologies2. In Spain Generation schedules are validated only by TSO,
considering the Transmission Network3. Currently no SO is using DER capacities to give system
support, eg. tertiary reserve4. VVC optimizing Distribution networks that consider DER
outputs as a control variables is non exiting (requires State Estimation in Distribution).
5. Back-up generators are not allowed to export energy into the network
1. Aggregating DER of different technologies2. In Spain Generation schedules are validated only by TSO,
considering the Transmission Network3. Currently no SO is using DER capacities to give system
support, eg. tertiary reserve4. VVC optimizing Distribution networks that consider DER
outputs as a control variables is non exiting (requires State Estimation in Distribution).
5. Back-up generators are not allowed to export energy into the network
What is new?
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
José M. Corera – Spain Round Table RT4
FENIX future(Higher DER penetration)
CentralGeneration
Distributionand Transmission Networks
DER
Feni
x co
ntro
l
CentralGeneration
TransmissionNetworks
Distribution Networks
DERC
entra
l con
trol
Pasi
ve c
ontro
l
If Current Status Quo
FB - Communications
CVPP - DEMSTVPP - DSO/TSO developments and operational costs
Benefit for society
Losses reduction
Energy –price reduction
Tertiary reserve price reduction
QoS improvement
Peak reduction and consequently, network investment reduction
Environmental benefits
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
José M. Corera – Spain Round Table RT4
Regulatory recommendationsDistribution
network revenue regulation
Distribution network revenue
regulation
- Allow DNOs to benefit from active networks investments if defer capital expenditure- Unbundling of network businesses should not block cooperation among DER and network operators
- Allow DNOs to benefit from active networks investments if defer capital expenditure- Unbundling of network businesses should not block cooperation among DER and network operators
Metering and communicationMetering and
communication
- Permit meters to establish real-time communications with other control devices- Request Interoperability among Europe
- Permit meters to establish real-time communications with other control devices- Request Interoperability among Europe
Ancillary servicesAncillary services -No unjustified barriers to distributed generators’ participation in ancillary services markets-No unjustified barriers to distributed generators’ participation in ancillary services markets
Subsidies for renewable energy
generation and CHP
Subsidies for renewable energy
generation and CHP
- Support mechanisms for DER must allow to benefit from participating in ancillary service provision (ex. through Virtual Power Plants)
- Support mechanisms for DER must allow to benefit from participating in ancillary service provision (ex. through Virtual Power Plants)
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
José M. Corera – Spain Round Table RT4
Impact• Potential impact is large, and grows with
penetration (…as DG becomes comparable in size to centralised generation, and hence implements more flexibility)
• However DG was not designed technically to give support to the system. And still many barriers still exist (too many “new” things), and differ among countries
• At the end of the project an impact for the 2020 EU scenario will be released
Prague, 8-11 June 2009
José M. Corera – Spain Round Table RT4
We see FENIX as a forerunner to the future Smartgrids. But a lot has to be done yet.
Thank you!
![[Webinar Slides] Advanced distribution management system integration of renewables and storage](https://static.fdocuments.net/doc/165x107/554a07c5b4c905e56c8b5840/webinar-slides-advanced-distribution-management-system-integration-of-renewables-and-storage.jpg)
