THE EVPA SURVEY INVESTING FOR IMPACT · investing-for-impact-the-evpa-survey-2017-2018 Financial...
2
Social Impact I m p a c t M a n a g e m e n t N o n - F i n a n c i a l S u p p o r t T a i l o r e d F i n a n c i n g THE VENTURE PHILANTHROPY AND SOCIAL INVESTMENT (VP/SI) SPACE IN FIGURES INVESTING FOR IMPACT European venture philanthropy organisations and social investors (VPO/SIs) adopt three core practices to achieve a strong and long-lasting social impact % VPO/SIs measuring different impact dimensions, multiple choice Investment duration per financial Instrument, % of VPO/SIs Average financial investment per SPO, % of VPO/SIs (reported < €200k representing 49% of the sample) % VPO/SIs providing different types of non-financial support, multiple choice IMPACT MANAGEMENT TAILORED FINANCING NON-FINANCIAL SUPPORT 86 % Outputs Outcomes Impact 92 % 71 % Strategic support Theory of Change Revenue strategy Human capital support Governance support 81 % 72 % 70 % 70 % 69 % Investment duration (years) grant 0 2 4 6 8–10 debt equity 29 % 48 % 14 % 9 % 14 % 35 % 4.5 % 38 % 53 % 4.5 % 27 % 24 % € 4% 10% 17% 18% < €50k €50k – €100k €100k – €150k €150k – €200k SPO VPO/SI THE EVPA SURVEY Measuring outcomes is necessary to maximise impact Having an impact management system is fundamental to take informed decisions It’s crucial to make sure social purpose organisations have clear impact objectives Non-financial support is as important as financial support for social purpose organisations Equity is the most patient form of capital VPO/SIs spend on average €7.8m to support social purpose organisations VPO/SIs help social purpose organisations get through the Valley of Death
Transcript of THE EVPA SURVEY INVESTING FOR IMPACT · investing-for-impact-the-evpa-survey-2017-2018 Financial...
Social ImpactIm
pac
t M
anag
ement
Non-Financial Support
Tailored Financing
THE VENTURE PHILANTHROPY AND SOCIAL INVESTMENT (VP/SI) SPACE IN FIGURES
INVESTING FOR IMPACT
European venture philanthropy organisations and social investors (VPO/SIs) adopt three core practices to achieve a strong and long-lasting social impact
% VPO/SIs measuring different impact dimensions, multiple choice
Investment duration per financial Instrument, % of VPO/SIs
Average financial investment per SPO, % of VPO/SIs (reported < €200k representing 49% of the sample)
% VPO/SIs providing different types of non-financial support, multiple choice
IMPACT MANAGEMENT TAILORED FINANCING
NON-FINANCIAL SUPPORT
86%
Outputs Outcomes Impact
92%
71%
Strategicsupport
Theory ofChange
Revenuestrategy
Human capitalsupport
Governancesupport
81%72% 70% 70% 69%
Investment duration (years)
grant
0 2 4 6 8–10
debt
equity
29% 48% 14% 9%
14%35%
4.5% 38% 53%4.5%
27% 24%€
4%
10%
17%
18%< €50k
€50k – €100k
€100k – €150k
€150k – €200k
SPO
VPO/SI
THE EVPA SURVEY
Measuring outcomes is necessary to
maximise impactHaving an impact
management system is fundamental to take
informed decisions
It’s crucial to make sure social purpose
organisations have clear impact objectives
Non-financial support is as important as financial
support for social purpose organisations
Equity is the most patient
form of capital
VPO/SIs spend on average
€7.8m to supportsocial purpose organisations
VPO/SIs help social purpose organisations get through
the Valley of Death
Western Europe
Asia
Africa
Central Eastern Europe
North America
LatinAmerica
54%
14%
16%
7%1%
8%
European venture philanthropy organisations and social investors (VPO/SIs) support a variety of social purpose organisations (SPOs) based in different geographies, active in a wide range of sectors and helping multiple groups of final beneficiaries
GEOGRAPHIES
SECTORS
The analysis is based on data collected by EVPA from 110 VPO/SIs of which 92 EVPA members and 18 non-members. Data refers to fiscal year 2017.
The EVPA Knowledge Centre is supported by:
This infographic has received financial support from the EU Programme for Employment and Social Innovation “EaSI” (2014-2020). http://ec.europa.eu/social/easi
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Contact us at [email protected] our website https://evpa.eu.com/knowledge-centre/publications/investing-for-impact-the-evpa-survey-2017-2018
Financial inclusion
Economic and social development
Education
% of € spend by VPO/SIs per geographies
% of VPO/SIs, multiple choice
% of € spend by VPO/SIs per sectors
1st
3rd2nd
27% 29% 12%
% of € spend by VPO/SIs for each financial instrument per type of investee
TYPE OF INVESTEES
Grants Debt Equity OthersHybrid Financial Instruments
Non-profit not generating revenue
Non-profit that generate some revenue
For-profit with pure social mission
Profit-maximising with social impact
FINAL BENEFICIARIES
People in poverty
Children and youth
People with disabilities
Migrants, asylum seekers and/or
refugees
49% 45%35%
26%
55%2%
8% 58% 25% 9%
23%
95%
72%
35% 6% 2%
3%2%
5%
€
Economic and social development still tops
the list of sectors
Grants are still needed even to support SPOs with a sustainable
business model
Central Eastern Europe started attracting more
VP/SI resources
VPO/SIs focussing on migrants, asylum
seekers and/or refugees doubled from 2016 to 2018
