The evolution of alternative migratory tactics: lessons ... Doccuments/CM-2009/H/H0609.pdf · The...
Transcript of The evolution of alternative migratory tactics: lessons ... Doccuments/CM-2009/H/H0609.pdf · The...
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
Not to be cited without prior reference to the author
The evolution of alternative migratory tactics: lessons from anadromous
salmonids
Julian Dodson1, Nadia Aubin-Horth2, Véronique Thériault3 and David Paez1
1Département de biologie, Pavillon Vachon, 1045, avenue de la Médecine, Université Laval, Québec (Québec) G1V 0A6, Canada 2Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Pavillon Charles-Eugène-Marchand, 1030, avenue de la Médecine, Université Laval, Québec (Québec) G1V 0A6 Canada 3Hatfield Marine Science Center, Marine Fisheries Genetics Program, Oregon State University, 2030 SE Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 97365, USA
Abstract: Alternative life-history tactics are common in fishes and many cases involve
resident and migratory life styles. The resident tactic may involve both sexes or be
restricted to males. Disruptive selection favouring alternative tactics may arise from two
different evolutionary mechanisms. On the one hand, alternative migratory tactics may be
the result of sexual selection for alternative reproductive phenotypes that impact other
aspects of life-history, including resource exploitation. On the other hand, alternative
migratory tactics may be caused by natural selection favouring divergence to exploit
multiple niches which in turn impacts reproductive tactics. Frequency dependent
selection plays a central role in maintaining alternative reproductive tactics and their
1
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
associated migratory phenotypes in natural populations. However, in cases where
individuals exploit multiple niches, natural selection favours multiple specialized
phenotypes and frequency dependent selection is not necessarily expected to be
important. Based on anadromous salmonids, we summarize evidence that (1) alternative
migratory tactics co-exist within single gene pools and that individuals may potentially
adopt one or the other alternative phenotype. The expression of different migratory
phenotypes is a function of sex and condition (growth or some correlated trait) and is
under both environmental and genetic control. Non-linear reaction norms that underlie
alternative life-history phenotypes vary among species and among different ages of the
same species. (2) The suppression of frequency-dependent selection may underlie the
existence of two common gradients observed anadromous salmonids: increasing
residency with altitude or distance upstream, and increasing anadromy at higher latitudes.
Anadromy may also be subjected to the forces driving the evolution of dispersal within
metapopulations, with selection favouring increased dispersal in more northerly
populations characterised by greater environmental stochasticity. The interplay between
condition-dependant alternative migratory tactics and condition-dependent dispersal in
metapopulations determines the degree of population genetic structure through its
influence on reproductive isolation and gene flow.
Introduction
A variety of migratory patterns co-exist within populations of most salmonid fishes.
Individual fish comprising a population may complete their entire lifecycle in freshwater
streams (residency) whereas others may migrate to sea (anadromy) or to lakes (e.g.
Olsson and Greenburg 2004) before returning to freshwater streams to spawn. Originally
referred to as partial migration (Jonnson and Jonnson 1993), these different migratory
tactics are generally associated with important differences in body sizes in adult
reproductive fish. As variation in body size has an important impact on reproductive
2
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
success, both sexual and natural selection must be considered to understand the evolution
of alternative migratory tactics (AMTs).
Size polymorphisms may be the result of sexual selection for alternative reproductive
tactics (ARTs) (Brockman and Taborsky 2008). Intense intra-sexual selection is a
characteristic of such mating systems and involves high variance in reproductive success
among individuals of the same sex (Schuster and Wade 2003). Sexual selection can be
important in producing the ART most commonly observed in fishes. Under a 1:1 sex
ratio, if some males monopolize and mate with several females, other males will
necessarily fail to reproduce. This intra-sexual competition strongly favours alternative
mating phenotypes (Shuster and Wade 2003). In salmonids, these are generally
represented by bourgeois males that monopolize mates using their large body size and
secondary sexual characteristics, and small parasitic males that exploit bourgeois males
by sneaking fertilisations (Taborsky 2008). It is more difficult to identify ARTs related to
intense intra-sexual competition among females. The female equivalent of male
parasitism would be intraspecific brood parasitism (placing eggs in another females nest,
for example). However, given the predominance of external fertilisation in fishes, brood
parasitism is expected to be rare (Taborsky 2008). Cooperative breeding is another
example; smaller, subordinate mature females may participate in reproduction. But given
the almost complete absence of parental care in salmonid fishes, there seems to be little
opportunity for cooperative breeding. A third possibility is that disruptive selection on
body size in females is a result of female competition for oviposition sites (Fleming and
Gross 1994).
In other cases, non-sexual selection on non-reproductive traits may provide the conditions
required for the evolution of AMTs and lead to the evolution of ARTs as a consequence.
Any morphological or metabolic variation that improves foraging success in one habitat
may lead to the development of alternative foraging tactics. If such tactics lead to
important size differences, the stage is set for the development of ARTs. In such cases,
non-sexual selection favours size dimorphism.
3
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
We must thus consider the simultaneous action of two evolutionary mechanisms to
understand the development and maintenance of AMTs. They are influenced to some
extent by sexual selection for alternative reproductive tactics that impact other aspects of
life-history, particularly foraging tactics that directly influence metabolism and growth.
Simultaneously, alternative migratory tactics are influenced by non-sexual selection
favouring ecological divergence across multiple niches which in turn impacts
reproductive tactics. The two sources of selection are inseparable in any discussion of
alternative migratory tactics.
Our purpose in this presentation is to review the evidence that alternative migratory
tactics are maintained under a threshold-trait model (Roff 1996). We first consider the
evidence that alternative migratory tactics co-exist within a single gene pool and that
individuals may potentially adopt one or the other alternative phenotype. We then look at
the evidence that the expression of different migratory phenotypes is a function of some
environmental cue. We also consider the evidence that a genetic component plays a role
in the development of the alternative migratory phenotypes. Second, we explore the
basis of alternative migratory and reproductive tactics among female salmonids whose
mating success may be relatively free of frequency-dependant selection. Thirdly, we aim
to apply this knowledge to understanding the biogeography of AMTs, in particular the
observation that residency tends to increase within rivers upstream and at higher altitudes
and that anadromy is favoured at higher latitudes.
I - The importance of condition-dependant selection in the maintenance of alternative
migratory tactics.
For an alternative phenotype to invade a population and to persist, the average fitness of
the alternative phenotype when it is rare must be greater than the average fitness of the
conventional phenotype and, to persist in a population at a stable frequency, the average
fitness of the alternative phenotype at equilibrium must equal the average fitness of the
conventional phenotype (Schuster and Wade 2003). Together, these conditions define
4
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
negative frequency-dependant selection which is associated with crossing fitness curves
of alternative phenotypes (Brockman and Taborsky 2008, Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Negative frequency dependant selection acting on hypothetical migrant and resident male phenotypes. Migrants with large body sizes adopt a bourgeois mating tactic whereas small-bodied residents adopt a sneaker mating tactic. The success of each morph depends on its frequency in the population, each doing better when rare. The relative frequency of each phenotype stabilizes at a point where the average fitness of each phenotype is equal (the evolutionary stable state, ESS). (modified from Brockman and Taborsky 2008).
Developmental and behavioural strategies, which are commonly associated with
salmonid alternative mating strategies (Gross 1985, Hutchings and Myers 1994) result
from the interaction between the environment and an individual’s genome, coupled with
a genetically determined threshold of sensitivity. Such developmental trajectories may be
considered as threshold traits whose expression is controlled by many loci of small
effects rather than in a Mendelian fashion (Roff 1996). Each genotype possesses its own
threshold and the expressed phenotype is a function of the genotype and the environment.
Individuals with phenotypes that exceed the threshold tend to display one reproductive
tactic, while individuals with phenotypes falling below the threshold display the
alternative reproductive tactic (Hutchings and Myers 1994, Figure 2).
5
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
Figure 2. Threshold traits and discrete developmental phenotypes. (A) Threshold reaction norms are non-linear functions defining the probability of different genotypes to express a dimorphic trait (eg. migrate, stay) as a function of a switch point and environmental variation. For a given genotype, individuals with phenotypes below the switchpoint express a default tactic (X); phenotypes above the threshold express a modified tactic (Y). (B) There is a normal distribution of switchpoints (F(sp)) in the population. At any specific value of the environmental clue, the environmentally determined threshold (e*) defines the relative frequency of the two tactics in the population. (modified from Tomkins and Hazel 2007).
The condition dependent selection hypothesis suggests that the environment will select
for a mean threshold value and that this value may thus vary among populations facing
different environments. Using common garden experiments, Piché et al. (2008)
demonstrated genetic differentiation among populations of Atlantic salmon for thresholds
of precocious maturity.
When the fitness consequences of alternative behavioural phenotypes depend on the
relative competitive ability of interacting individuals (i.e. their relative status), then
6
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
selection is said to be status dependent (Gross 1996). Status may be considered as a
threshold trait and the status-dependent selection model may thus be considered as being
equivalent to the condition-dependant model if individuals have genetic variation for
switchpoints and populations have different mean threshold values (Tomkins and Hazel
2007).
Figure 3. Status-dependant selection. (A) The distribution of condition (status) in the population and the fitness (F) functions of the resident and migrant phenotype in a population. Fitness functions cross over and are thus frequency dependent. The intersection of the two fitness functions defines the evolutionary stable switch point where the fitness of each phenotype is equal. Low status fish maximize their fitness by developing as migratory fish that delay reproduction and adopt the bourgeois behavioural repertoire while high status fish maximize their fitness by suspending migration, maturing early and adopting the sneaker behavioural repertoire. (B) If the average fitness of the resident phenotype declines due to density-dependent competition for example (eg. Fleming and Gross 1994), the switch point shifts towards higher status thus reducing the frequency of residents in the population and re-establishing the evolutionary stable state (modified from Tomkins and Hazel 2007).
In salmonids, many different patterns of alternative migratory strategies exist. In
predominantly anadromous populations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) for example, all
females are anadromous and only the males exhibit the residency/anadromy dichotomy
(Hutchings and Myers 1994). In Pacific salmonids (Oncorhynchus sp.), both sexes are
anadromous, but some anadromous males may spend only several months at sea before
7
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
returning to freshwater to spawn (jacks) relative to others that may stay at sea for several
years (eg Gross 1991). Strictly freshwater resident males occur but are rare (residual
sockeye salmon, for example (Ricker 1938)). In other species of salmonids, both males
and females may exhibit the residency/migratory dichotomy, exploiting streams, rivers,
estuaries and the open ocean for feeding (eg. brook charr Salvelinus fontinalis, Theriault
and Dodson 2003, Lenormand et al. 2003; arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus, Nordeng 1983;
rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, Pascual et al. 2001; brown trout Salmo trutta;
Jonsson, 1985) such that both sexes may exhibit considerable variance in body size at the
moment of reproduction.
Does the hypothesis of condition-dependant selection apply to alternative migratory
phenotypes? Firstly, we must establish that alternative migratory tactics co-exist within a
single gene pool and that individuals may potentially adopt one or the other phenotype.
Much empirical evidence exists to support the proposition that the sympatric occurrence
of alternative migratory phenotypes in salmonids is not accompanied by genetic
differentiation when the alternative phenotypes occupy the same spawning grounds at the
same time (Arctic charr (anadromous, small and large freshwater residents) (Nordeng
1989), anadromous and freshwater brown trout (Hinder et al. 1991, Charles et al. 2005,
Charles et al. 2006), anadromous steelhead and resident O. mykiss (Docker & Heath
2003, Olsen et al. 2006, McPhee et al. 2007), resident and anadromous brook charr
(Thériault et al (2007)). They may therefore be considered as conditional tactics
expressed within common gene pools. In cases where residency is restricted to males, as
in predominantly anadromous populations of Atlantic salmon, no such differentiation can
occur as early maturing parr must necessarily spawn with anadromous females.
Second, we must establish if the expression of different migratory phenotypes is a
function of some environmental cue. Assuming that individual growth performance
integrates environmental variation and is the most reliable indicator of condition, we may
then ask if the expression of different migratory phenotypes is related to growth (or body
size-energy reserves). Several studies have supported the hypothesis that faster growing
individuals migrate to more productive feeding areas than slower-growing individuals
8
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
because they maintain higher metabolic rates and are energetically constrained at a
younger age (or smaller size) than slow-growers (brown trout, Forseth et al. 1999, brook
charr, Morinville and Rasmussen 2003). Thus fast growth leads to migration and the
exploitation of richer feeding grounds. However, other studies have shown that fast early
growth is associated with freshwater residency and, in some cases, early male maturity
(brown trout Olsson et al. (2006), Atlantic salmon (Rowe and Thorpe 1990, Aubin-Horth
and Dodson 2004).
Third, we must also establish that genetic variation for the threshold level exists among
individuals. Several studies have shown a significant heritable component in the
development of alternative migratory tactics (eg. chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha) Heath et al. 2002, Atlantic salmon, Garant et al. 2003, brook charr,
Thériault et al. 2007). However, this does not necessarily mean that the male offspring of
one phenotype will be composed mainly of that phenotype because of the role of
environmental variation. For example, resident Atlantic salmon fathers may produce
more anadromous offspring if the offspring experience poor growth conditions. These
anadromous fish in turn will father resident male offspring if growth conditions improve.
Complicating further this relationship, growth shows high heritability in salmonids
(Garcia De Leaniz et al. 2007). It is plausible then that the relationship found between the
tactic of the father and that of the sons in a given environment could be explained largely
by the heritability of growth rate or size, rather than the heritability of the threshold size,
leading to the expression of the same tactic as the father. Some support for this
hypothesis was provided by Garant et al. (2002) who found that young Atlantic salmon
fathered by precocious males grew faster than those fathered by anadromous males
during the time from hatching to yolk sac absorption. In contrast, Morrasse et al. (2008)
working with the same Atlantic salmon population as Garant et al. (2002) demonstrated
in the laboratory that weight, length, and protein content of the progeny of anadromous
and sneaker males did not differ.
Experiments were conducted to determine if the higher incidence of Atlantic salmon
sneaker males in the upstream sites of the Ste-Marquerite R. documented by Aubin-Horth
et al. 2006, is due to selection acting on growth thresholds, or whether it is due to varying
9
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
growth opportunities particular to the different sites. Wild anadromous and sneaker
progenitors from upstream and downstream sites were used in a factorial mating design.
Families were reared in captivity, and individual growth of PIT-tagged age-1 fish was
monitored for an additional 10 months, at which time all male progeny were either smolts
or sexually mature. No difference in the incidence of smolt and sneaker male progeny
was observed between upstream and downstream sites or between the two paternal
reproductive tactics. However, 42% of the total variation was explained by the variation
in incidence among sire groups, providing preliminary evidence of genetic variation in
the incidence of alternative migratory and reproductive tactics. Second, the predicted
growth asymptote differed between offspring that matured as sneakers and offspring that
smolted, with smolt attaining larger body sizes than mature parr as previously
documented (Fig. 4).
Figure 4. Differences in asymptotic length for smolt (left) and sneaker parr (right) offspring originating from different paternal tactics (F-fighter, S-sneaker) in upstream (U) and downstream (D) sites. Significant differences were seen only in the smolts (stars). Error bars are 95% CI. Please note different y-axis scales.
Third, even though no effects from the paternal tactic and its population of origin were
observed for sneaker parr, significant growth variation among mature parr offspring
between sire groups was observed (LRT = 227.3, P-value < 0.001) (Fig. 5). Because
10
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
common environmental effects, repeated measurements made on each individual and
maternal effects are accounted for, the variation among sire groups is evidence of genetic
variation for growth rates.
Figure 5. Fig. 5. Variation in asymptotic size among mature parr offspring of fighter (F) and sneaker (S) sires. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals
Evidence exist that population reaction norms associating growth or size with migratory
strategies are highly plastic, varying as a function of age, sex and possibly parental tactic.
In brook charr, migration first occurs at the age of 1+ and outmigrants are among the
bigger, most metabolically active juvenile fish. However, outmigration also occurs at the
age of 2+ and outmigrants are among the smallest juvenile fish. The largest juveniles
remain in freshwater and begin spawning the following year (Thériault and Dodson 2003,
Thériault et al. 2008). Furthermore, the sex ratio of outmigrants is male-biased among 1+
fish and female biased among 2+ fish, suggesting somewhat different selective pressures
on male and female migration thresholds. Rikardsen et al. (1997) also found that more
male than female Arctic charr migrated at a younger age. Ricker (1938) formulated a 2-
step scenario while studying anadromous and residual (freshwater resident phenotype)
sockeye salmon in Canada. Fast-growers matured in freshwater, medium growers
migrated at 1+ and slow growers decided upon migration or residency the following year.
Among these, the fastest growing fish remained resident and matured in fresh water
whereas the slowest-growing fish migrated at 2+.
11
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
The frequency dependent nature of alternative reproductive tactics in males suggests that
alternative migratory tactics must also be influenced by frequency dependent selection
acting during breeding. However, there is little empirical evidence either for or against
this hypothesis. We may speculate that a reduction in the proportion of migratory fish,
particularly among males, will cause an increase in the proportion of resident males. As
resident fish experience less mortality than do migrants (eg brook charr, Thériault et al.
2008) we would expect the overall density of males on the spawning grounds to also
increase, thus altering the operational sex ratio and the number of males competing for
females at any point in time. Experiments that artificially manipulate overall density and
the relative proportions of resident and migratory phenotypes are needed to evaluate how
the mating success of different migratory phenotypes changes as a consequence. We
would expect that foraging decisions and associated migratory tactics may be modulated
and constrained by differential mating success on the spawning grounds.
In conclusion, the hypothesis of condition-dependant selection applies reasonably well to
alternative migratory tactics in salmonids. Most, but not all, cases of AMTs co-exist
within common gene pools. Secondly, the expression of alternative phenotypes appears
to be a function of individual condition (expressed as growth rate, body size or some
correlated measure). In some cases, faster growing individuals choose to migrate to more
productive habitats whereas in other cases, slower growers migrate. Genetic
differentiation among populations for thresholds of precocious maturity has been
demonstrated supporting the threshold-trait, condition dependant model. The significant
variation in the nature of the reaction norms associating growth (or some surrogate
measure of condition) and migratory/reproductive phenotype observed among paternal
types, populations and species suggests that phenotypic plasticity plays a predominant
role in the origin and maintenance of AMTs.
II - Alternative female migratory strategies
12
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
Given the absence of brood parasitism and cooperative breeding in most female
salmonids, disruptive selection acting upon females to produce different migratory
phenotypes may be associated with competition for breeding sites. There is strong
competition among females for the best spawning sites and body size is a major factor in
determining the winner of such contests (van den Berghe and Gross 1989, Fleming and
Gross 1994). There is evidence that females of different sizes exploit streams and
spawning grounds of different dimensions (Fig.5) such that the maintenance of different
body sizes among females may reduce competition among females for oviposition sites.
Smaller females should do better in smaller streams with smaller substrate sizes and more
spatially restrained spawning sites than bigger females. Such an advantage may
counterbalance the loss of fecundity associated with smaller size. Under such a scenario,
alternative female phenotypes will not be under frequency-dependant selection as the
mating success of one phenotype will not detract from the mating success of the
alternative. Rather, their relative abundance will depend upon the relative abundance of
the spawning habitats and not on the frequency of the alternative phenotype. Large
anadromous males can displace small males in a variety of salmonids species, (eg.
anadromous coho salmon, Fleming and Gross 1994). We speculate that in spatially
constrained spawning habitats, small males may be restricted to breeding with small
females. In such spatially constrained habitat, both males and females could be released
from frequency-dependent selection favouring the loss of the anadromous phenotype
from both sexes. This may lead to the development of isolated populations of small fish
inhabiting small streams within the drainage basin. This could happen in the absence of
geographical isolation and may represent a case of isolation through adaptation (Nosil
and Funk 2008) rather than isolation by distance or physical barrier.
13
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
Figure 5. The size distribution of anadromous male and female brook charr in the main stem and anadromous and resident brook charr in a tributary stream of the St. Marguerite River, Québec Canada. Anadromous fish found in the spawning tributary stream are the smallest of the anadromous fish, both sexes combined.
III - The biogeography of alternative migratory tactics
Two major gradients in the incidence of alternative migratory strategies have been
documented in salmonids fishes: increasing residency with altitude or distance upstream,
and increasing anadromy at higher latitudes. A number of studies have demonstrated that
the incidence of anadromy in partially migratory salmonid populations tends to diminish
with altitude and/or distance upstream and that anadromous individuals preferentially
occupy the lower reaches of their nursery rivers. In two separate studies, male parr of
Atlantic salmon of a given age and size were more likely to be sexually mature if located
further upstream/at higher altitudes (Baum et al. 2004, Aubin-Horth et al. 2006). Both
studies concluded that the gradient reflected the increasing costs of migration. In brown
trout, the recruitment of anadromous populations declined with altitude relative to that of
resident populations illustrating a cost of migration positively correlated with altitude
(Bohlin et al. 2001). Several studies have demonstrated that resident fish are found
14
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
further upstream than anadromous fish of the same population (brook charr (Curry 2005),
Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) (Armstrong and Morrow 1980), rainbow trout (Riva-
Rossi et al. 2007)).
These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that increased migratory costs
favour residency over anadromy as distances to spawning grounds increase. Migratory
costs may include significant energy expenditures during the upstream migration
(Dodson 1997, Jonsson and Jonsson 2006) as well as an increasing probability of losing
access to upstream or higher elevation spawning grounds because of low discharge and/or
high summer temperatures (Aubin-Horth et al. 2006). If the average fitness of the
migrant male phenotype declines due to mortality selection (Endler 1986) or an increased
probability of exclusion from the spawning grounds, the reproductive success of residents
may exceed that of migrants independent of variations in condition (body size or growth).
If the fitness curves of the two tactics no longer intersect (Fig. 4), negative frequency
dependent selection would no longer play a significant role in determining the incidence
of alternative reproductive tactics among males and the resident tactic would be favoured.
In the case of females, fecundity selection and competition among females favours body
size (Fleming and Gross 1994) such that the anadromous tactic should always garner the
greatest fitness benefits. A resident phenotype would only be expected to develop in
females in cases of extreme mortality selection against the anadromous phenotype. The
many cases that document the development of land-locked populations above impassable
barriers to migration, whether they are natural (e.g. rainbow trout, Kostow 2003) or
artificial (eg. white-spotted charr, Yamamoto et al. 2004), represents an extreme situation
whereby downstream migrants cannot return to spawning sites and the migratory
phenotype is culled from both males and females.
Considerable evidence exists to demonstrate that anadromous phenotypes of many
salmonid species predominate at higher latitudes (Dolly Varden (Maekawa and Nakano
2002), white-spotted charr (Salvelinus leucomaenis), (Yamamoto et al 1999), cherry trout
(Oncorhynchus masou) (Kato 1991), brook charr (Castric et al. 2003), rainbow trout
(McPhee et al. 2007)). The latitudinal gradient in anadromy is to some extent the result of
15
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
the altitudinal gradient previously mentioned. As downstream areas at the southerly limits
of distribution are less and less hospitable for juvenile rearing because of temperature
constraints (among other habitat variables), anadromous fish must migrate greater
distances upstream and to higher latitudes to insure that their young are associated with
appropriate rearing habitat. Thus, the cost of migration increases and the average
reproductive success of anadromous phenotypes declines to the point where fitness
curves may no longer intercept. In such a case, frequency dependent selection no longer
plays a role and natural selection culls the anadromous strategy from the most southerly
populations.
This mechanism however does not explain why the frequency of the resident phenotype
should decline at higher latitudes. Several mechanisms may be involved. The food
availability hypothesis proposes that anadromy evolves in situations where marine
productivity is greater than productivity in freshwater (Gross et al. 1988). The importance
of food intake for body growth and the contribution of growth to fitness through
increased fecundity and improved male and female breeding success have been
documented (Gross et al. 1988). This hypothesis was originally formulated to explain the
difference in the latitudinal distribution of anadromy and catadromy. It was based on a
species level analysis ranging from 0 to 75 degrees of latitude. The original food
availability hypothesis has been subsequently appropriated by many authors to explain
intraspecific differences in the incidence of anadromy of salmonids exhibiting alternative
migratory tactics across rather limited latitudinal ranges. This particular interpretation of
the original hypothesis is incorrect for several reasons. Estuaries and adjacent coastal
waters are among the most productive habitats on the planet and growth in such habitats
will always be better relative to that achieved in upstream fresh waters. If anadromy is
uniquely the result of selection for increased body size, migration to estuarine habitat in
salmonids would always be favoured. Secondly, body size is not simply the result of
ecosystem productivity. Size at age is also influenced extrinsically by the length of
growing season and intrinsically by the balance between rates of anabolism and
catabolism that determines growth rate. Some studies have demonstrated that fish from
high-latitudes have a higher capacity for growth than their low-latitude conspecifics at the
16
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
same temperature (Conover and Present 1990). As such, the reaction norms of growth as
a function of temperature are greater at high latitudes. This may involve two types of
trade-offs (Angilletta et al. 2003); allocation trade-offs between different functions and
acquisition trade-offs, whereby an increase in foraging results in an increase in mortality.
If higher mortality is a result of increased foraging at high latitudes (eg. Langford et al.
2001), switching to more productive habitats could increase the average fitness of the
anadromous phenotypes relative to the resident phenotype at high latitudes. As such, the
benefits of foraging in more productive marine environments is realised only when
foraging in freshwater involves acquisition trade-offs.
One benefit of the migratory phenotype not yet considered is that migration provides the
opportunity to disperse and reproduce elsewhere. Alternative migratory phenotypes are
thus also subjected to the forces driving the evolution of dispersal (Castric and
Bernatchez 2003). In the context of metapopulation theory, factors acting at the between-
population level favour dispersal. In particular, variation in population size caused by
habitat disturbance, ecological succession and demographic stochasticity may all favour
dispersal, while a costly dispersal form should decline in frequency in more stable
habitats and populations (Olivieri et al. 1995). Recent theoretical work has shown
selection for increased dispersal in metapopulations with high environmental
stochasticity and low dispersal costs (Bonte and de la Pena 2009). Along the eastern coast
of North America, anadromous salmonids have dispersed northwards from southern
refugia over the past 15 000 years since the last glacial maximum. Populations at
northern latitudes have thus been more recently founded than those found further south
(eg. brook charr, Castric and Bernatchez 2003). If environmental stochasticity increases
with latitude, we may expect greater levels of dispersal and hence a greater incidence of
the migratory tactic in the more recently founded and more environmentally stochastic
populations found at higher latitudes. At present, the interface between condition-
dependant alternative migratory tactics and condition-dependent dispersal in
metapopulations has yet to be explored.
17
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
References Angilletta M.J., Wilson R.S., Navas C.A., James R.S. 2003. Trade offs and the evolution
of thermal reaction norms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 234-240.
Armstrong, R.H., Morrow, J.E. 1980. The Dolly Varden. In: Balon, E.K., ed. Charrs:
Salmonid fishes of the genus Salvelinus. The Hague: Dr. W. Junk Publishers. Pp.
99-140.
Aubin-Horth, N., Dodson, J.J. 2004. Influence of individual body size and variable
thresholds on the incidence of a sneaker male reproductive tactic in Atlantic
salmon. Evolution 58: 136-144.
Aubin-Horth, N., Bourque, J-F., Daigle, G., Hedger, R.D., Ddodson, J.J. 2006.
Longitudinal gradients in threshold sizes for alternative male life history tactics in
a population of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and
Aquatic Sciences. 63 : 2067-2075.
Baum D., Laughton R., Armstrong J., Metcalfe N. 2004. Altitudinal relationship between
growth and maturation rate in salmon parr. Journal of Animal Ecology 73: 253-
260.
van den Berghe E.P., Gross M.R. 1989. Female size and nest depth in coho salmon
(Oncorhynchus kisutch). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41:
204-206.
Bohlin T., Pettersson J., Degerman E. 2001. Population density og migratory and resident
brown trout (Salmo trutta) in relation to altitude: evidence for migration coast.
Journal of Animal Ecology 70:112-121
Bonte D., de la Pena E. 2009. Evolution of body-condition dependent dispersal in
metapopulations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 1242-1251.
Brockman H.J., Taborsky M. 2008. Alternative reproductive tactics and the evolution of
alternative allocation phenotypes. In Oliveira, R.F., Taborsky M., Brockman H.J.
eds. Alternative Reproductive tactics: an integrative approach. Cambridge
University Press. Pp 25-51.
Castric V., and Bernatchez, L. 2003. The rise and fall of isolation by distance in the
anadromous brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill). Genetics 163: 983-996.
Charles, K., Guyomard, R., Hoyheim, B., Ombredane, D., Baglinière, J.-L. 2005. Lack of
18
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
genetic differentiation between anadromous and non-anadromous sympatric trout
in a Normandy population. Aquatic Living Resources 18: 65–69.
Charles K, Roussel J-M, Lebel J-M, Baglinière J-L. 2006. Genetic differentiation
between anadromous and freshwater resident brown trout (Salmo trutta L.):
insights obtained from stable isotope analysis. Ecology of Freshwater Fish. 15:
255–263.
David O. Conover D.O., Present T.M.C., 1990. Countergradient variation in growth rate:
compensation for length of the growing season among Atlantic silversides from
different latitudes. Oecologia 83: 316-324.
Curry R.A. 2005. Assessing the reproductive contributions of sympatric anadromous and
freshwater-resident brook trout. Journal of Fish Biology 66: 741–757
Docker M.F., Heath D.D. 2003. Genetic comparison between sympatric anadromous
steelhead and freshwater resident rainbow trout in British Columbia, Canada.
Conservation Genetics 4: 227-231.
Dodson, J.J. 1997. Fish Migration: an evolutionary perspective. In Godin, J.-G. ed.
Behavioral Ecology of Teleost Fishes. Oxford University Press. pp. 10-36.
Endler J.A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton,
N.J.
Fleming I., Gross M.R. 1994. Breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (Coho:
Oncorhynchus kisutch): measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 48:
637-657.
Forseth T., Næsje T.F., Jonsson B., Harsaker K. 1999. Juvenile migration in brown trout:
a consequence of energetic state. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 783-793.
Garcia de Leaniz C., Fleming I. A., Einum S. et al. 2007. A critical review of adaptive
genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation. Biological
Reviews 82: 173–211.
Garant, D., Fontaine, P.-M., Good, S.P., Dodson, J.J., Bernatchez, L. (2002). Influence of
male parental identity on growth and survival of offspring in Atlantic salmon
(Salmo salar). Evolutionary Ecology Research 4: 537-549.
Garant, D., Dodson, J.J., Bernatchez, L. 2003. Differential reproductive success and
heritability of alternative reproductive tactics in wild Atlantic salmon. Evolution
19
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
57: 1133-1141.
Gross M.R. 1985. Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon. Nature 313:
47-48.
Gross, M. R., R. M. Coleman and R. M. McDowall. 1988. Aquatic productivity and the
evolution of diadromous fish migration. Science 239:1291-1293.
Gross M.R. 1991. Evolution of alternative reproductive strategies: frequency-dependent
sexual selection in male bluegill sunfish. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society London B 332: 59-66
Heath D.D., Rankin L., Bryden C.A., Heath J.W., Shrimpton J.M. 2002. Heritability and
Y-chromosome influence in the jack male life history of chinook salmon
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Heredity 89: 311-317
Hindar K., Jonsson B., Ryman N., Stahl G. 1991. Genetic relationships among
landlocked, resident, and anadromous brown trout, Salmo trutta L. Heredity 66:
83-91.
Hutchings, J.A., Myers R.A. 1994. The evolution of alternative mating strategies in
variable environments. Evolutionary Ecology 8: 256-268.
Jonsson, B. 1985. Life history patterns of freshwater resident and sea-run migrant brown
trout in Norway. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 114: 182–194.
Jonsson B., Jonsson N. 2006. Life history effects of migratory costs in anadromous
brown trout. Journal of Fish Biology 69: 860-869.
Jonsson, B., Jonsson, N. 1993. Partial migration: niche shift versus sexual maturation
in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 3: 348–365.
Kato F. 1991. Life histories of Masu and Amago salmon (Oncorhynchus masou and
Oncorhynchus rhodurus). In Groot C., Margolis, L. eds. Pacific Salmon Life
Histories. UBC Press, Vancouver. Pp 447-520.
Kostow K. 2003 Factors that Influence Evolutionarily Significant Unit Boundaries and
Status Assessment in a Highly Polymorphic Species, Oncorhynchus mykiss, in the
Columbia Basin. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Information Report
#2003-04. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Fish Division, Portland OR,
USA.
Lenormand, S., Dodson J. J., Ménard A. 2004. Seasonal and ontogenetic patterns in the
20
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
migration of anadromous brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Canadian Journal of
Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 61: 54-67.
Maekawa K., Nakano S. 2002. Latitudinal trends in adult body size of Dolly Varden,
with special reference to the food availability hypothesis. Population Ecology 44:
17-22.
McPhee M.V., Utter F., Stanford J. A., et al. 2007. Population structure and partial
anadromy in Oncorhynchus mykiss from Kamchatka: relevance for conservation
strategies around the Pacific Rim. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2007: 16: 539-547
Morasse S., Guderley H., Dodson J.J. 2008. Paternal reproductive strategy influences
metabolic capacities and muscle development of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)
embryos. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 81: 402-413
Morinville, G.R., Rasmussen J. B. 2003. Early juvenile bioenergetic differences between
anadromous and resident brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Canadian Journal of
Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 60: 401-410.
Nordeng H. 1983. Solution to the "char problem" based on Arctic char (Salvelinus
alpinus) in Norway. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40:
1372-1387.
Nosil P., Egan, S.P., Funk D.J. 2008. Heterogeneous genomic differentiation between
walking-stick ecotypes: “isolation by adaptation” and multiple roles for divergent
selection. Evolution 62: 316-336.
Olivieri I., Michalakis Y., Gouyon P-H. 1995. Metapopulation genetics and the evolution
of dispersal. American Naturalist 146: 202-228.
Olsen J.B., Wuttig K., Fleming D., Kretschmer, E.J., Wenburg J.K. 2006. Evidence of
partial anadromy and resident-form dispersal bias on a fine scale in populations of
Oncorhynchus mykiss. Conservation Genetics 7:613-619.
Olsson I.C., Greenburg L.A., Bergman E., Wysujack K. 2006. Environmentally induced
migration: the importance of food. Ecology Letters 9:645-651.
Olsson I.C., Greenberg L.A. 2004. Partial migration in a landlocked brown trout
population. Journal of Fish Biology 65: 106-121.
Pascual, M. A., Bentzen, P., Riva Rossi, C. M., Mackey, G., Kinnison, M., Walker, R.
2001. First documented case of anadromy in a population of introduced rainbow
21
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
trout in Patagonia, Argentina. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
130: 53-67.
Piché J, Hutchings JA, Blanchard W. 2008. Genetic variation in threshold reaction norms
for alternative reproductive tactics in male Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B- Biological Sciences 275: 1571-1575.
Ricker W.E. 1938. Residual and Kokanee salmon in Cultus Lake. Journal of the Fisheries
Research Board of Canada 4: 192-217.
Rikardsen, A. H., Svenning, M.-A., Klemetsen, A. 1997. The relationship between
anadromy, sex ratio and parr growth of Arctic charr in a lake in north Norway.
Journal of Fish Biology 51, 447-461.
Riva-Rossi C., Pascual M.A., Babaluk J.A., Garcia-Asorey M., Halden N.M. 2007. Intra-
population variation in anadromy and reproductive life span in rainbow trout
introduced in the Santa Cruz River, Argentina. Journal of Fish Biology 70, 1780-
1797
Rowe D.K. Thorpe J.E. 1990. Differences in growth between maturing and non-maturing
male Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. parr. Journal of Fish Biology 36: 643-658.
Roff D.A. 1996. The evolution of threshold traits in animals. Quarterly Review of
Biology 71: 3-35
Schuster S.M., Wade M.J. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University
Press, Princeton.
Taborsky, M. 2008. Alternative reproductive tactics in fish. In Oliveira, R.F., Taborsky
M., Brockman H.J. eds. Alternative Reproductive tactics: an integrative approach.
Cambridge University Press. Pp 251-299.
Thériault, V., Dodson J.J. 2003. The role of size in determining anadromy or residency in
brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). J. Fish Biology 63: 1-16.
Thériault, V., Garant, D., Bernatchez, L., Dodson, J.J. 2007. Heritability of life history
tactics and genetic correlation with body size in a natural population of brook
charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 20: 2266-2277.
Thériault V., Dunlop E., Dieckman U., Bernatchez L., Dodson J.J. 2008. The impact of
fishing-induced mortality on the evolution of alternative life-history tactics in
brook charr. Evolutionary Applications 1: 409-423.
22
ICES CM 2009 /H:06
Tomkins J.L., Hazel W. 2007. The status of the conditional evolutionarily stable strategy.
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 522-528.
Yamamoto S., Morita K., Goto A. 1999. Geographic variations in life-history
characteristics of white-spotted charr (Salvelinus leucomaenis). Canadian Journal
of Zoology 77: 871-878.
Yamamoto S., Morita K., Koizumi I., Maekawa K. 2004. Genetic differentiation of
white-spotted charr (Salvelinus leucomaenis) populations after habitat
fragmentation: Spatial–temporal changes in gene frequencies. Conservation
Genetics 5: 529-538.
23