The English Indices of Deprivation 2015 Briefing Note ...

NORTH SOMERSET COUNCIL BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SERVICE

The English Indices of Deprivation 2015

Briefing Note – November 2015

KEY MESSAGES:

North Somerset Council ranked as the 121st most deprived district out of 326 districts.

North Somerset was the district with the 3rd highest inequality, as measured by the range in national ranking between the most and least deprived LSOAs in the district.

North Somerset had 5 LSOAs within the most deprived 5% in England, all within South or Central wards of Weston-super-Mare.

There were 11 LSOAs within the least deprived 5% in England and these were spread across the district.

The more relatively deprived LSOAs in IMD 2010 had generally become more relatively deprived and these were located in Weston-super-Mare.

And note that:

Deprivation indices are relative to the rest of England, not absolute.

The indices are a measure of relative deprivation, not affluence.

The index of multiple deprivation is different from poverty, which is focussed on the availability of financial resources.

IMD 2015 used data from 2012/13.

The indicators used in IMD 2015 are very similar to those used in IMD 2010,

but there are some differences, making comparisons approximate.

BACKGROUND

The English Indices of Deprivation 2015, which include the Index of Multiple

Deprivation (IMD), were released at the end of September 2015 and updated the

previously published 2010 indices. The IMD 2015 provided a relative ranking of

areas across England according to their levels of deprivation, derived from a set of

37 indicators. These indicators were organised into seven domains of deprivation:

Income, Employment, Education, Health & Disability, Crime, Barriers to Housing and

Services and Living Environment. These were weighted and combined to create the

index of multiple deprivation. Appendix 1 provides details of the indicators, domain

weightings and any changes since IMD 2010. The data used by the Department for

Communities and Local Government (DCLG) for the IMD 2015 were mainly from

2012/13 and so are a historical view to an extent.

The IMD 2015 compared the 32,844 Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs) across

England, of which there were 135 in North Somerset. Each LSOA has a population

of approximately 1,500 and, in order to maintain this population size, the Office for

National Statistics (ONS) periodically changes the boundaries of LSOAs. The ONS

split 6 of North Somerset’s LSOAs into a total of 17 new LSOAs for the 2011

National Census. This means that some LSOAs cannot be compared between IMD

2010 and IMD 2015.


The relative position of a LSOA is indicated by its ranking nationally and a more

easily used indicator can be obtained by converting this rank into a percentile. The

most deprived LSOAs will have a percentile near 0% and the least deprived LSOAs

will have a percentile near 100%. The national quartile into which each LSOA in

North Somerset falls is shown on the map on the next page.

DEPRIVATION AT A DISTRICT LEVEL

The key measure selected by the DCLG to describe relative deprivation among local

authorities was the proportion of a local authority’s LSOAs that were in the most

deprived decile (bands of 10%) nationally. If deprivation was spread evenly, then

each local authority would have 10% of its LSOAs in the most deprived decile.

In IMD 2015 127 of the 326 districts (39%) did not have any LSOAs in the most

deprived decile nationally and, at the other extreme, there were five districts that had

between 40% and 50% of their LSOAs in this decile (Middlesbrough, Knowsley,

Kingston upon Hull, Liverpool and Manchester). North Somerset had 6.7% of its

LSOAs in the most deprived decile, making it the 121st most deprived district. On

this measure, Bristol was 55th most deprived, BANES was 192nd and South

Gloucestershire was 200th. The district level measures published by the DCLG tend

to show North Somerset’s ranking declining very slightly between IMD 2010 and IMD

2015.

In IMD 2010, North Somerset had 7.2% (9) of its LSOAs in the most deprived decile

and the apparent improvement to 6.7% in IMD 2015 was due to the splitting of other

LSOAs. The same 9 LSOAs remained in the most deprived national decile.

The 20 most deprived districts in England were largely the same as found in IMD

2010. However, the London Boroughs of Hackney, Tower Hamlets, Newham and

Haringey became relatively less deprived and no longer featured in this list.

When the seven domains of deprivation are considered individually at a district level,

North Somerset ranks out of 326 districts as follows for the proportion of LSOAs in

the most deprived 10% nationally:

Employment 88th most employment deprived district

Health 96th

Income 107th

Living Environment 170th

Education, Skills & Training 180th

Crime 181st

Barriers to Housing and Services 192nd

There are also two supplementary income related indices directed specifically at

children and older people respectively. North Somerset’s ranking of the proportion of

LSOAs in the most deprived 10% nationally on these was:

Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index 117th

Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index 120th


DEPRIVATION AT A LOCAL LEVEL – IMD MAP AND MAPS OF EACH DOMAIN OF DEPRIVATION


INEQUALITY

Inequality, as measured by the range in national ranking between the most and least

deprived LSOAs in a district, is likely to have increased in North Somerset. IMD

2015 shows North Somerset as having the 3rd largest range in England out of the

326 districts, up from 7th in IMD 2010, which used slightly different methodology.

The table below shows the 10 districts with the highest inequality.

The table below shows the rankings on this inequality measure of our neighbouring

unitary councils.

MOST DEPRIVED AREAS WITHIN NORTH SOMERSET

In North Somerset there were 5 LSOAs within the most deprived 5% of LSOAs

nationally in IMD 2015, one fewer than in IMD 2010 (slightly different methodology).

All were within the South and Central wards of Weston-super-Mare and two of these

on the Bournville Estate were within the most deprived 1% nationally. One LSOA

(Alfred Street, Weston-super-Mare Central) was in the bottom decile for 6 out of the

7 domains of deprivation.

The LSOA that was no longer in the most deprived 5% was Ellenborough Park,

Weston-super-Mare Central, which had a percentage ranking of 7% in IMD 2015.

Min of IMD

2015 Rank

(where 1 is

most deprived)

Max of IMD

2015 Rank

(where 1 is

most deprived)

Range Rank

Sheffield 53 32,816 32,763 1

Newcastle upon Tyne 45 32,779 32,734 2

North Somerset 120 32,815 32,695 3

Wirral 36 32,724 32,688 4

Stockport 47 32,733 32,686 5

Bradford 40 32,725 32,685 6

East Riding of Yorkshire 85 32,762 32,677 7

Leeds 22 32,653 32,631 8

Bury 156 32,688 32,532 9

Chesterfield 291 32,673 32,382 10

Min of IMD

2015 Rank

(where 1 is

most deprived)

Max of IMD

2015 Rank

(where 1 is

most deprived)

Range Rank

Bristol, City of 65 32,150 32,085 22

Bath & N E Somerset 2,881 32,689 29,808 116

South Gloucestershire 4,411 32,732 28,321 167


What does this mean in terms of numbers of people?

The Income Deprivation and Employment Deprivation domains are rates of the

population experiencing this type of deprivation. The indicators in these domains are

constructed as non-overlapping counts and are simply summed together to identify

the total numbers of people experiencing the type of deprivation. There have been

some changes to the indicators behind these domains between IMD 2010 and IMD

2015, but the DCLG attempted to keep them as comparable as possible over time

[see Appendix 1]. New initiatives, such as Work Capability Assessments, will have

affected indicator values.

The next table shows that the numbers of income deprived people included in the

IMD have increased in two of the most deprived LSOAs since IMD 2010, but have

remained static or have decreased slightly in the other three LSOAs. The numbers

of employment deprived individuals in the IMD have increased in all five of the

LSOAs.


More up-to-date data shows that the number of claimants of Job Seekers Allowance

or Universal Credit in these 5 LSOAs decreased by 49% between January 2013 and

January 2015 and the most recent data1 (October 2015) shows a further decrease.

The same pattern occurred in North Somerset and England, which saw decreases of

58% and 47% respectively between January 2013 and January 2015.

The indicator values available within the other domains are not simple counts of

individuals, but it is nevertheless possible to make comparisons between IMD 2015

and IMD 2010 for some of their constituent indicators. The proportion of young

people staying on in post-16 education increased in the four most deprived LSOAs,

only decreasing in W-s-M South Windwhistle, whereas the proportion of young

people entering higher education decreased in all 5 of the most deprived LSOAs.

There was a mixed picture among the values of the two indicators unaffected by

benefits/allowances in the health domain (‘years of potential life lost’ and ‘acute

morbidity’). The values of both indicators deteriorated for W-s-M Central Grand Pier

and W-s-M South Windwhistle between IMD 2010 and IMD 2015, whereas the other

3 LSOAs improved on one indicator and deteriorated on the other.

Percentiles by Domain for the most deprived LSOAs and changes in ranking

based on IMD 2010 and IMD 2015 definitions

The IMD 2015 relative ranking percentiles in each domain for the most deprived

LSOAs are shown in the table below, along with colour coding to show whether

these rankings have improved or declined. The crime domain shows apparent

improvements in ranking since IMD 2010, but the comparisons suggest the four main

domains of income, employment, education and health have declined in their relative

positions in most cases.

1 Source: nomis - ONS; Claimant count for JSA and Universal Credit; 20/11/2015.

LSOAs in Most Deprived

5% Nationally

2011

Census

Pop-

ulation

Income

deprived

individuals

in IMD 2015

(2012 data)

Change in

no. Income

deprived

individuals

compared

to IMD 2010

definitions

Employment

deprived

individuals

in 2015

(2012/13

data)

Change in no.

Employment

deprived

individuals, inc.

disabled and

carers, compared to

IMD 2010 definitions

WsM South - Argyle Avenue 1,253 640 No change 290 Up 40

WsM South - Byron Road 1,418 700 Down 20 285 Up 25

WsM Central - Alfred Street 1,535 640 Up 70 385 Up 25

WsM Central - Grand Pier 1,549 485 Up 65 310 Up 65

WsM South - Windwhistle 1,466 620 Down 15 265 Up 35


LEAST DEPRIVED AREAS

There were 11 North Somerset LSOAs in the least deprived 5% of LSOAs nationally

and these were spread across the district. Three of these were in Nailsea, two were

in Portishead and the rest were: Church Town in Backwell, the area around Dial Hill

in Clevedon, part of North Worle in Weston-super-Mare, part of Easton-in-Gordano,

the East of Winscombe and Claverham/Cleeve.

Ranks as percentages

Multiple

Deprivation Income

Employ-

ment Education Health Crime

Barriers

Housing

&

Services

Living

Environ-

ment

WsM South - Argyle Avenue 0.4% 0.3% 0.5% 0.8% 1.5% 2.8% 73.6% 46.7%

WsM South - Byron Road 0.8% 0.4% 0.8% 1.4% 1.2% 12.3% 64.4% 61.8%

WsM Central - Alfred Street 1.0% 2.4% 0.7% 5.7% 2.4% 3.2% 69.8% 7.5%

WsM Central - Grand Pier 2.0% 10.2% 0.6% 20.3% 0.9% 0.2% 58.4% 8.8%

WsM South - Windwhistle 2.3% 1.6% 1.7% 1.9% 4.8% 16.1% 67.2% 52.3%

Key: Relatively more deprived than in IMD 2010

Relatively less deprived than in IMD 2010


DEPRIVATION LEVEL OF AREAS IN WHICH CHILDREN AND OLDER PEOPLE

LIVE

Overall, 26% of the North Somerset population lived in one of the most deprived half

of LSOAs nationally and 74% lived in one of the least deprived half of LSOAs, at the

time for which the data was current (2012). A very slightly smaller proportion (25%)

of both children (aged 0-15) and older people (aged 60 and over) lived in the most

deprived half of LSOAs.

The LSOAs in the most deprived decile contained 7% of the total North Somerset

population. This included 7% of all children (2,416) and 6% of all older people

(3,269). The numbers and percentages of children, older people and the total

population in each deprivation decile are shown in Appendix 4.

CHANGES IN RANKING OF LSOAS BETWEEN IMD 2010 AND IMD 2015

Comparing IMD 2015 against IMD 2010 for the 118 LSOAs with boundaries that did

not change suggests that 46% (54) improved their relative positions nationally and

54% (64) declined in their relative positions. For the new LSOAs created by splitting

previous LSOAs, 8 improved their relative positions compared to the position of the

parent LSOA and 9 declined. However, comparisons should be treated with caution

due to changes in methodology.

In general, the more deprived LSOAs in IMD 2010 declined in their relative positions

and the least deprived improved to a small extent in their positions. This pattern was

also observed previously when IMD 2010 was compared to the 2007 version.

The charts on the next page show the IMD 2010 percentile for a LSOA on the

horizontal axis and its IMD 2015 percentile on the vertical axis. If the national

percentile ranking for a LSOA was the same in IMD 2015 as it had been in IMD 2010

then the marker for that LSOA would sit on the line. If the ranking in IMD 2015 was

higher (better) than in IMD 2010 then the marker would sit above the line and

conversely, if the ranking in IMD 2015 was lower, then the marker would sit below

the line.

The charts suggest that a small majority of Weston-super-Mare and Nailsea &

Backwell LSOAs have declined in their rankings, although Nailsea & Backwell

remains with overall low relative deprivation. Clevedon contains approximately equal

numbers of LSOAs that have improved in their rankings and that have declined in

their rankings and the same is true for Portishead and Rural/Other areas.

The subsequent bar chart highlights those LSOAs that appear to have changed their

ranking by over 8 percentage points between IMD 2010 and IMD 2015. Nine LSOAs

declined and five LSOAs improved by this amount. On looking at changes in each of

the domains of deprivation for the LSOAs that apparently declined 8 or more

percentiles, a common feature is a relative decline in the health domain. Within this

domain the indicator ‘Years of potential life lost’ has worsened for most of these nine

LSOAs and contributed to the relative decline.


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

IMD

20

15

Pe

rce

nti

le

IMD 2010 Percentile

Comparison of IMD 2015 percentile with IMD 2010 percentile for North Somerset LSOAs by Town

Weston-super-Mare

IMPROVED

DECLINEDNote: the IMD methodology differs s l ightly

between IMD 2010 and IMD 2015 so exact comparisons

cannot be made

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

IMD

20

15

Pe

rce

nti

le

IMD 2010 Percentile


Backwell/Nailsea

IMPROVED

DECLINEDNote: the IMD methodology differs slightly


cannot be made

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

IMD

20

15

Pe

rce

nti

le

IMD 2010 Percentile


Rural/Other

IMPROVED



cannot be made

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

IMD

20

15

Pe

rce

nti

le

IMD 2010 Percentile


Clevedon

Portishead

IMPROVED



cannot be made


The longer-term changes can be seen in the chart below, which shows the

percentages of North Somerset LSOAs contained within each of the national

quartiles over the last 15 years. Both of the quartiles with higher deprivation have

grown, from a combined total of 15% in IMD 2000 to 26% in IMD 2015. Although

increasing, this remains better than the national average which is fixed at 50%.

The changes to LSOA boundaries between IMD 2010 and IMD 2015 have kept the

increases in the percentages of LSOAs in the most deprived two quartiles to 1%

each. This is because the LSOAs that had experienced significant population growth

and consequently were split were predominantly in areas of low deprivation. For

example, the number of LSOAs in the most deprived quartile increased from 15 to 18

between IMD 2010 and IMD 2015 and none of these LSOAs had been affected by

splitting. The total of 18 would have represented 14.5% of North Somerset’s 124

LSOAs in IMD 2010, but actually represented 13.3% of the 135 LSOAs in IMD 2015.


The change in percentage rank for individual LSOAs between IMD 2007 and IMD

2010 and between IMD 2010 and IMD 2015 is shown in Appendix 3.

ISSUE WITH COMPARING BETWEEN IMD 2010 AND IMD 2015 FOR NORTH

SOMERSET IN PARTICULAR

The real change on the ground between the period IMD 2010 relates to and the

period IMD 2015 relates to is likely to have been less than the previous section

suggested, because IMD 2010 is likely to have underestimated deprivation within

North Somerset. The ONS produces mid-year population estimates using

methodology based on the last national census and combines this with data

available on births, deaths, migration etc. The 2010 mid-year population estimate for

North Somerset turned out to be almost 5% higher than the subsequent 2011

national census total, suggesting the ONS population estimation methodology had

not worked particularly well for North Somerset.

A number of the indicators within IMD are based on the number of individuals known

to be in a deprivation group in an area, divided by the total number of individuals in

that area, to give a percentage. If the total number of individuals in the area is an

over-estimate, then the percentage will be an under-estimate. This will result in a

less-deprived ranking on IMD.

For example, in IMD 2010 the LSOA ‘W-s-M Central - Alfred Street’ contained 570

income-deprived individuals, out of an estimated 1,768 living in the area (32%).

However, the 2011 national census, which is considered a more reliable source for

population figures, showed there were 13% fewer people living in that area,

suggesting the percentage of these who were income-deprived might have been

nearer 37%.

Author: Malcolm Lane, Senior Business Intelligence Analyst, Research & Insight

Sources:

1. ‘The English Indices of Deprivation 2015’ reports, Department for

Communities and Local Government, September 2015

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015

2. ‘The English Indices of Deprivation 2010 – Briefing Note June 2011’, Natalie

Richards, NSC, June 2011.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015


APPENDIX 1

Domains and Indicators used in the Indices of Deprivation 2015

The Indices of Deprivation 2015 were derived from 37 indicators at LSOA level,

which were allocated between seven domains of deprivation. The relative measure

of deprivation for an LSOA was calculated by combining the transformed ranks for

the seven domains according to the weightings shown in the chart below.

The criteria for inclusion of an indicator were that it should be ‘domain specific’,

appropriate for the purpose of measuring major features of that deprivation, up-to-

date, capable of being updated on a regular basis, statistically robust and available

for the whole of England at a small area level in a consistent form.

The indicators within each domain and the changes since IMD 2010 were as follows:

Income Deprivation

The definition of low income used included both those people who were out-of-work

and those who were in work, but who had low earnings and who satisfied the

respective means tests.


1. Adults and children in Income Support families

2. Adults and children in income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance families

3. Adults and children in income-based Employment and Support Allowance

families

4. Adults and children in Pension Credit (Guarantee) families

5. Adults and children in Working Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit families not

already counted, that is those who are not in receipt of Income Support,

income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance, income-based Employment and

Support Allowance or Pension Credit (Guarantee) and whose equivalent

income (excluding housing benefit) is below 60 per cent of the median before

housing costs

6. Asylum seekers in England in receipt of subsistence support, accommodation

support, or both.

Changes since IMD 2010 were that indicator 5 was expanded beyond just families

receiving Child Tax Credit to include Working Tax Credit and that changes in income

support rules affecting indicator 1 required the inclusion of new indicator 3.

Employment Deprivation

The Employment Deprivation Domain measures the proportion of the working age

population in an area involuntarily excluded from the labour market. This includes

people who would like to work but are unable to do so due to unemployment,

sickness or disability, or caring responsibilities.

7. Claimants of Jobseeker’s Allowance (both contribution-based and income-

based), women aged 18 to 59 and men aged 18 to 64

8. Claimants of Employment and Support Allowance, women aged 18 to 59 and

men aged 18 to 64

9. Claimants of Incapacity Benefit, women aged 18 to 59 and men aged 18 to 64

10. Claimants of Severe Disablement Allowance, women aged 18 to 59 and men

aged 18 to 64

11. Claimants of Carer’s Allowance, women aged 18 to 59 and men aged 18 to

64.

Indicator 11 was a new addition since IMD 2010. The three New Deal indicators

included in the IMD 2010 have been removed, because New Deal and Flexible New

Deal have been replaced by the Work Programme and the recipients should already

appear in indicator 7. Changes to rules around income support and jobseeker’s

allowance will also have affected the income and employment domains.

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation

The indicators fall into two sub-domains: one relating to children and young people

and one relating to adults’ skills.

Children and Young People sub-domain:

12. Key Stage 2 attainment: The average points score of pupils taking reading,

writing and mathematics Key Stage 2 exams


13. Key Stage 4 attainment: The average capped points score of pupils taking

Key Stage 4

14. Secondary school absence: The proportion of authorised and unauthorised

absences from secondary school

15. Staying on in education post 16: The proportion of young people not staying

on in school or non-advanced education above age 16

16. Entry to higher education: A measure of young people aged under 21 not

entering higher education.

Adults’ Skills sub-domain:

17. Adults’ skills: The proportion of working age adults with no or low

qualifications, women aged 25 to 59 and men aged 25 to 64

18. English language proficiency: The proportion of working age adults who

cannot speak English or cannot speak English well, women aged 25 to 59 and

men aged 25 to 64.

Indicator 18 has been included for the first time in IMD 2015 and uses Census 2011

data. The age range included in indicator 17 has been raised from 54. The Key

Stage 3 attainment indicator included in IMD 2010 has been removed, because this

is now teacher assessed. The number of years of data used to calculate the

averages used in the Children and Young People sub-domain indicators has been

increased.

Health Deprivation and Disability

This measures the risk of premature death and the impairment of quality of life

through poor physical or mental health. It does not measure aspects of behaviour or

environment that may be predictive of future health deprivation.

19. Years of potential life lost: An age and sex standardised measure of

premature death

20. Comparative illness and disability ratio: An age and sex standardised

morbidity/disability ratio

21. Acute morbidity: An age and sex standardised rate of emergency admission

to hospital

22. Mood and anxiety disorders: A composite based on the rate of adults suffering

from mood and anxiety disorders, hospital episodes data, suicide mortality

data and health benefits data.

Data on claimants of Employment Support Allowance (which replaced Incapacity

Benefit and Income Support paid because of an illness or disability for new claimants

from 2008) has been incorporated into the comparative illness and disability ratio

indicator and the health benefits component of the mood and anxiety disorders

indicator. Work Capability Assessments for Employment Support Allowance were

introduced in 2008, reducing the number of people eligible for incapacity benefits.


Crime

This measures the risk of personal and material victimisation at local level.

23. Violence – number of reported violent crimes (18 reported crime types) per

1000 at risk population

24. Burglary – number of reported burglaries (4 reported crime types) per 1000 at

risk population

25. Theft – number of reported thefts (5 reported crime types) per 1000 at risk

population

26. Criminal damage – number of reported crimes (8 reported crime types) per

1000 at risk population

Due to Home Office changes to the counting rules for crimes, the offence categories

used for each indicator were amended to obtain the best comparability with IMD

2010.

Barriers to Housing and Services

The indicators used fall into two sub-domains: ‘geographical barriers’, which relate to

the physical proximity of local services and ‘wider barriers’ which includes issues

relating to access to housing such as affordability and homelessness.

Geographical Barriers sub-domain:

27. Road distance to a post office

28. Road distance to a primary school

29. Road distance to a general store or supermarket

30. Road distance to a GP surgery.

Wider Barriers sub-domain:

31. Household overcrowding: The proportion of all households in a Lower-layer

Super Output Area which are judged to have insufficient space to meet the

household’s needs

32. Homelessness: Local authority district level rate of acceptances for housing

assistance under the homelessness provisions of the 1996 Housing Act,

assigned to the constituent Lower-layer Super Output Areas

33. Housing affordability: Difficulty of access to owner-occupation or the private

rental market, expressed as the inability to afford to enter owner occupation or

the private rental market.

Indicator 33 was revised to include the inability to afford to enter the private rental

market, in addition to the owner-occupier sector and gives equal weight to each.

This indicator was also able to be produced at LSOA level for IMD 2015, rather than

just at local authority level which was used in IMD 2010. ‘Housing Market Areas’,

which reflect commuting and migration patterns, were used rather than local

authorities and other changes to improve the reliability of the indicator were also

incorporated.

Indicator 32 was made more robust by using homelessness data for three years

rather than the one year that was used in IMD 2010.


Living Environment Deprivation

The indicators used fall into two sub-domains. The ‘indoors’ living environment

measures the quality of housing, while the ‘outdoors’ living environment contains

measures of air quality and road traffic accidents.

Indoors sub-domain:

34. Houses without central heating: The proportion of houses that do not have

central heating

35. Housing in poor condition: The proportion of social and private homes that fail

to meet the Decent Homes standard.

Outdoors sub-domain:

36. Air quality: A measure of air quality based on emissions rates for four

pollutants

37. Road traffic accidents involving injury to pedestrians and cyclists: A measure

of road traffic accidents involving injury to pedestrians and cyclists among the

resident and workplace population.

Changes since IMD 2010 were that the method of calculating indicator 35 was

changed to improve accuracy and one of its data source was amended. One of the

targets within indicator 36 was also made more stringent.


APPENDIX 2

COMPONENTS OF DEPRIVATION

The following table lists all of the 135 LSOAs in North Somerset with their individual IMD 2015 rankings as percentiles. The

national decile that each fits into is shown as colour coding. The 7 domains of deprivation are presented in the same way, so for an

individual LSOA it can be seen which component domains of the IMD 2015 have resulted in its overall position.

Ranking of each North Somerset LSOA as a percentile with Domains of Deprivation

LSOA

code (2011

onwards)

LSOA Name IMD 2015

Rank as a

Percent-

age

Income

deprivation

Employ-

ment

deprivation

Education,

Skills &

Training

deprivation

Health

deprivation

and

Disability

Crime Barriers

to

Housing

and

Services

Living

Environ-

ment

deprivation

E01014831 WsM South - Argyle Avenue 0.4% 0.3% 0.5% 0.8% 2% 3% 74% 47%

E01014832 WsM South - Byron Road 0.8% 0.4% 0.8% 1.4% 1.2% 12% 64% 62%

E01014800 WsM Central - Alfred Street 1.0% 2% 0.7% 6% 2% 3% 70% 7%

E01014801 WsM Central - Grand Pier 2% 10% 0.6% 20% 1% 0.2% 58% 9%

E01014833 WsM South - Windwhistle 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 16% 67% 52%

E01014829 WsM South - Marchfields Way 7% 4% 7% 9% 10% 14% 35% 41%

E01014802 WsM Central - Ellenborough Park 7% 13% 3% 24% 4% 10% 63% 11%

E01014844 WsM West - Victoria Quadrant 7% 10% 4% 27% 4% 17% 53% 9%

E01014799 WsM Central - Stafford Road 10% 14% 4% 30% 8% 20% 71% 14%

E01014842 WsM West - Upper Church Road 10% 18% 6% 15% 17% 15% 24% 15%

E01014834 WsM South - Loxton Road 11% 7% 8% 10% 14% 27% 63% 54%

E01014828 WsM South - Brompton Road 13% 7% 9% 12% 12% 34% 89% 70%

E01014806 WsM Clarence & Uphill - Clarence Park 15% 18% 9% 39% 3% 40% 74% 33%

E01014810 WsM East - Airfield 20% 14% 22% 20% 20% 22% 20% 75%

E01014835 WsM South Worle - Tavistock Road 20% 15% 15% 9% 31% 47% 59% 50%

E01014809 WsM East - Mendip Road 22% 21% 14% 14% 24% 30% 87% 42%


LSOA

code (2011

onwards)

LSOA Name IMD 2015

Rank as a

Percent-

age

Income

deprivation

Employ-

ment

deprivation

Education,

Skills &

Training

deprivation

Health

deprivation

and

Disability

Crime Barriers

to

Housing

and

Services

Living

Environ-

ment

deprivation

E01014841 WsM West - Birnbeck 24% 29% 22% 52% 34% 30% 21% 4%

E01014827 WsM North Worle - Magdalen Way 24% 15% 19% 22% 28% 40% 56% 46%

E01014830 WsM South - Brighton Road 25% 22% 20% 35% 31% 28% 62% 17%

E01014811 WsM East - Earlham Grove 27% 21% 15% 33% 22% 39% 80% 62%

E01014807 WsM Clarence & Uphill - Severn Avenue 29% 24% 16% 44% 35% 28% 78% 38%

E01032673 WsM South Worle - Elmham Way 32% 22% 27% 42% 15% 33% 78% 88%

E01014843 WsM West - Cecil Road 35% 39% 31% 36% 16% 65% 34% 48%

E01014815 WsM Milton & Old Worle - Milton Park Road 35% 28% 21% 28% 31% 60% 91% 72%

E01014786 Pill - West 36% 30% 22% 27% 25% 73% 80% 75%

E01014774 Kewstoke - Coast 37% 43% 31% 51% 26% 35% 17% 74%

E01014746 Banwell & Winscombe - Banwell Village 40% 28% 23% 31% 64% 63% 61% 75%

E01014751 Clevedon Central - Oldville Avenue 41% 38% 35% 30% 34% 50% 69% 52%

E01014840 WsM South Worle - Mead Vale 42% 31% 29% 23% 49% 65% 94% 72%

E01014795 Portishead South & North Weston - Severn Rd 43% 42% 37% 35% 36% 41% 47% 59%

E01014753 Clevedon East - Teignmouth Road 43% 37% 34% 36% 39% 47% 79% 53%

E01014804 WsM Clarence & Uphill - Uphill Road North 44% 40% 23% 61% 26% 49% 95% 80%

E01014812 WsM East - Garsdale Road 45% 47% 36% 34% 26% 60% 78% 56%

E01014820 WsM Milton & Old Worle - Greenwood Road 46% 28% 38% 42% 32% 84% 99% 56%

E01014836 WsM South Worle - Silverberry Road 47% 39% 36% 36% 43% 55% 63% 65%

E01014750 Clevedon Central - Queens Road 52% 49% 35% 82% 37% 54% 88% 32%

E01014846 WsM West - Montpelier 53% 47% 39% 59% 43% 50% 68% 56%

E01014781 Nailsea North & West - Silver Street 55% 48% 37% 43% 46% 81% 55% 86%

E01032669 WsM East - Carousel Lane 55% 52% 75% 40% 76% 51% 9% 62%

E01014764 Congresbury - East 57% 44% 41% 63% 67% 74% 34% 73%

E01014780 Nailsea North & West - Southfield Road 58% 46% 47% 37% 55% 71% 59% 87%

E01014813 WsM East - Chesham Road 58% 52% 39% 48% 61% 63% 96% 47%

E01014769 Hutton & Locking - RAF Locking/East 60% 53% 51% 50% 79% 66% 18% 95%

E01032679 WsM East - Aspen Park Road 60% 61% 65% 40% 47% 59% 24% 95%

E01014744 Banwell & Winscombe - Banwell West 60% 75% 57% 61% 73% 77% 11% 37%

E01032666 Banwell and Winscombe - Station Road 60% 57% 62% 48% 69% 23% 44% 81%


LSOA

code (2011

onwards)

LSOA Name IMD 2015

Rank as a

Percent-

age

Income

deprivation

Employ-

ment

deprivation

Education,

Skills &

Training

deprivation

Health

deprivation

and

Disability

Crime Barriers

to

Housing

and

Services

Living

Environ-

ment

deprivation

E01032670 WsM East - Montacute Circus 60% 47% 56% 48% 67% 60% 32% 90%

E01014772 Hutton & Locking - Bleadon 61% 63% 55% 50% 63% 55% 20% 90%

E01032671 WsM East - Longridge Way 61% 52% 58% 41% 74% 59% 40% 64%

E01014756 Clevedon South - Hallswell Road 61% 69% 50% 54% 46% 89% 53% 31%

E01014839 WsM South Worle - Bransby Way 61% 49% 52% 41% 77% 31% 78% 95%

E01014838 WsM South Worle - Gannet Road 61% 54% 46% 35% 53% 73% 89% 82%

E01014860 Yatton - Mendip Road 62% 43% 46% 37% 60% 85% 96% 90%

E01014848 Winford - Felton 62% 76% 72% 54% 67% 61% 9% 62%

E01014763 Clevedon Yeo - Bryant Gardens 62% 55% 58% 32% 64% 70% 51% 81%

E01014808 WsM Clarence & Uphill - Selbourne Road 64% 51% 43% 67% 58% 53% 94% 68%

E01014856 Yatton - North Yatton/Cleeve 64% 58% 57% 54% 62% 67% 36% 69%

E01014783 Nailsea North & West - North Street 64% 60% 58% 54% 78% 86% 19% 63%

E01014770 Hutton & Locking- Locking West/Hutton North 64% 65% 40% 57% 43% 89% 53% 96%

E01014858 Yatton - Kingston Seymour 65% 82% 71% 66% 72% 91% 10% 30%

E01032677 Portishead East - Sanderling Place 65% 45% 64% 63% 28% 89% 89% 88%

E01014847 Winford - Winford/Dundry 66% 88% 82% 68% 72% 16% 19% 65%

E01014826 WsM North Worle - Lisle Road 68% 49% 59% 44% 65% 65% 83% 91%

E01014845 WsM West - Ashcombe Park 68% 60% 44% 74% 64% 56% 62% 87%

E01014817 WsM Milton & Old Worle - The Scaurs 68% 61% 51% 42% 65% 63% 93% 82%

E01032668 Banwell and Winscombe - Dunedin Way 71% 53% 57% 57% 72% 69% 59% 98%

E01014824 WsM North Worle - Savernake Road 71% 56% 62% 53% 59% 68% 74% 89%

E01032672 WsM South Worle - West Wick 72% 78% 69% 62% 68% 33% 41% 74%

E01014854 Wrington - East 72% 90% 91% 75% 89% 76% 7% 32%

E01014740 Backwell - Farleigh 72% 86% 88% 90% 70% 73% 11% 31%

E01032667 Banwell and Winscombe - Willow Close 73% 55% 61% 60% 69% 83% 49% 92%

E01014760 Clevedon West - St Andrews 73% 54% 51% 62% 64% 82% 94% 85%

E01014821 WsM North Worle - Looksbrook Road 73% 58% 59% 59% 58% 61% 96% 85%

E01032681 Portishead Central - High Street 74% 58% 75% 80% 45% 46% 92% 66%

E01014745 Banwell & Winscombe - Sandford 74% 63% 66% 68% 48% 99% 39% 96%

E01014773 Kewstoke - Ebdon Grounds/Wick 74% 86% 81% 77% 86% 56% 11% 60%


LSOA

code (2011

onwards)

LSOA Name IMD 2015

Rank as a

Percent-

age

Income

deprivation

Employ-

ment

deprivation

Education,

Skills &

Training

deprivation

Health

deprivation

and

Disability

Crime Barriers

to

Housing

and

Services

Living

Environ-

ment

deprivation

E01014741 Banwell & Winscombe - Winscombe West 75% 60% 58% 80% 52% 85% 69% 75%

E01014755 Clevedon North - Hallam Road 75% 59% 63% 91% 50% 84% 85% 49%

E01014805 WsM Clarence & Uphill - Totterdown Lane 76% 79% 51% 60% 58% 93% 54% 97%

E01032680 Gordano - Tickenham 76% 86% 81% 81% 83% 90% 10% 49%

E01014771 Hutton & Locking - Hutton South 76% 66% 54% 70% 61% 76% 70% 93%

E01014766 Easton-in-Gordano - East 77% 97% 99% 96% 86% 52% 11% 30%

E01014797 Portishead West - West Hill 77% 59% 65% 55% 75% 80% 67% 95%

E01014765 Congresbury - West 79% 48% 75% 68% 75% 80% 76% 82%

E01014803 WsM Clarence & Uphill - Uphill Village 79% 71% 54% 75% 64% 67% 80% 87%

E01014852 Wraxall & Long Ashton - Wraxall 80% 84% 83% 91% 83% 92% 16% 45%

E01014825 WsM North Worle - St Marks Road 81% 70% 69% 60% 71% 53% 85% 95%

E01014747 Blagdon & Churchill - Blagdon 81% 86% 79% 91% 85% 96% 29% 28%

E01014754 Clevedon North - Hill Road 81% 71% 62% 90% 68% 85% 93% 40%

E01014758 Clevedon Walton - Castle Road 82% 86% 69% 96% 59% 97% 18% 98%

E01014816 WsM Milton & Old Worle - Westbrook Road 82% 72% 64% 57% 72% 81% 96% 71%

E01014819 WsM Milton & Old Worle - Balmoral Way 82% 70% 64% 55% 82% 75% 88% 83%

E01032682 Portishead East - Conference Avenue 82% 75% 68% 79% 75% 92% 35% 83%

E01014851 Wraxall & Long Ashton - Long Ashton West 82% 71% 77% 51% 74% 60% 95% 80%

E01014739 Backwell - West Town 83% 89% 85% 91% 83% 81% 17% 57%

E01014823 WsM North Worle - Taunton Road 83% 71% 83% 67% 55% 47% 93% 97%

E01014757 Clevedon South - Kenn Moor Drive 84% 82% 82% 51% 76% 93% 39% 85%

E01014857 Yatton - Stowey Road 85% 70% 59% 63% 84% 81% 96% 92%

E01014748 Blagdon & Churchill - Langford 85% 83% 92% 82% 81% 74% 37% 47%

E01014849 Wraxall & Long Ashton - Failand 85% 90% 90% 93% 82% 44% 26% 77%

E01014787 Pill - East 85% 72% 70% 73% 81% 72% 77% 77%

E01014796 Portishead S'th & N'th Weston-Gordano School 86% 84% 73% 82% 59% 83% 52% 83%

E01014794 Portishead Redcliffe Bay - Hillside Road 86% 88% 92% 92% 93% 96% 8% 97%

E01014738 Backwell - Station 86% 61% 67% 80% 76% 86% 95% 89%

E01014859 Yatton - Station 87% 67% 66% 83% 70% 84% 89% 94%

E01014784 Nailsea North & West - Mizzymead 87% 75% 79% 55% 74% 89% 76% 84%


LSOA

code (2011

onwards)

LSOA Name IMD 2015

Rank as a

Percent-

age

Income

deprivation

Employ-

ment

deprivation

Education,

Skills &

Training

deprivation

Health

deprivation

and

Disability

Crime Barriers

to

Housing

and

Services

Living

Environ-

ment

deprivation

E01014779 Nailsea East - Blackthorn Way 87% 80% 80% 94% 65% 78% 35% 98%

E01014792 Portishead East - Brampton Way 87% 72% 76% 68% 65% 82% 90% 91%

E01014790 Portishead Coast - Lake Road 88% 86% 75% 94% 81% 31% 76% 89%

E01032674 Gordano - The Finches 88% 87% 84% 78% 89% 77% 31% 78%

E01014853 Wrington - South/West 88% 69% 77% 85% 83% 63% 73% 82%

E01014752 Clevedon East - Walton Road 88% 78% 73% 72% 87% 86% 69% 67%

E01014762 Clevedon Yeo - Chipping Cross 88% 76% 78% 64% 82% 79% 64% 97%

E01014789 Portishead Coast - Nore Road 89% 98% 91% 95% 86% 99% 13% 83%

E01032676 Portishead Central - Marina 90% 84% 93% 63% 80% 63% 73% 74%

E01014785 Nailsea North & West - St Marys Grove 90% 96% 88% 80% 75% 98% 26% 89%

E01014793 Portishead Redcliffe Bay - Weatherley Drive 91% 95% 96% 92% 91% 100% 12% 100%

E01014761 Clevedon West - Yeolands Drive 92% 88% 86% 49% 86% 98% 72% 89%

E01014782 Nailsea North & West - Causeway View 92% 82% 75% 73% 87% 91% 68% 95%

E01014818 WsM Milton & Old Worle - Worlebury Hill Rd 92% 89% 73% 83% 84% 85% 57% 97%

E01014749 Blagdon & Churchill - Churchill 93% 85% 90% 91% 87% 71% 50% 77%

E01014777 Nailsea East - Whiteoak Way 93% 81% 83% 67% 88% 90% 70% 97%

E01032675 Portishead Central - Lockside 94% 86% 96% 91% 92% 86% 38% 76%

E01014850 Wraxall & Long Ashton - Long Ashton East 94% 93% 87% 97% 83% 59% 60% 81%

E01014775 Nailsea East - Vynes Way 96% 99% 95% 96% 89% 98% 24% 99%

E01014822 WsM North Worle - Cornfields 96% 88% 84% 86% 78% 71% 84% 100%

E01014776 Nailsea East - Winchcombe Close 96% 91% 97% 92% 92% 90% 33% 97%

E01014855 Yatton - Claverham 97% 93% 94% 86% 83% 84% 61% 87%

E01014742 Banwell & Winscombe - Winscombe East 98% 90% 85% 90% 90% 96% 70% 97%

E01014798 Portishead West - Merlin Park 98% 92% 93% 91% 93% 98% 48% 99%

E01014767 Easton-in-Gordano - West 98% 99% 91% 89% 82% 82% 78% 90%

E01014778 Nailsea East - Rickford Road 99% 99% 99% 95% 95% 62% 62% 97%

E01014759 Clevedon Walton - Dial Hill 99% 98% 98% 96% 89% 98% 53% 94%

E01032678 Portishead East - Village Square 100% 98% 100% 88% 93% 85% 89% 91%

E01014737 Backwell - Dark Lane/Church Town 100% 100% 98% 96% 94% 80% 96% 89%


APPENDIX 3

Changes in Index of Multiple Deprivation Percentage Rankings for LSOAs over

time – Note changes in components between revisions.

LSOA Names

Post-2011

LSOA

CODE

Percent-

ile

Pre-2011

LSOA

CODE

Percent-

ile

Percent-

ile

WsM South - Argyle Avenue E01014831 0.4% Declined E01014831 0.8% Declined 1.1%

WsM South - Byron Road E01014832 0.8% Improved E01014832 0.7% Declined 1.6%

WsM Central - Alfred Street E01014800 1.0% Declined E01014800 2.9% Declined 4.0%

WsM Central - Grand Pier E01014801 2.0% Declined E01014801 4.4% Improved 4.2%

WsM South - Windwhistle E01014833 2.3% Declined E01014833 2.7% Declined 5.1%

WsM South - Marchfields Way E01014829 6.8% Declined E01014829 7.3% Improved 5.2%

WsM Central - Ellenborough Park E01014802 7.0% Improved E01014802 4.0% Declined 8.6%

WsM West - Victoria Quadrant E01014844 7.0% Declined E01014844 7.0% Declined 12.1%

WsM Central - Stafford Road E01014799 10.0% Improved E01014799 9.6% Declined 11.7%

WsM West - Upper Church Road E01014842 10.4% Declined E01014842 13.1% Declined 15.5%

WsM South - Loxton Road E01014834 11.3% Declined E01014834 18.0% Improved 16.1%

WsM South - Brompton Road E01014828 12.9% Declined E01014828 18.7% Declined 19.2%

WsM Clarence & Uphill - Clarence Park E01014806 15.3% Improved E01014806 13.5% Declined 18.6%

WsM East - Airfield E01014810 19.8% Declined E01014810 29.4% Improved 27.0%

WsM South Worle - Tavistock Road E01014835 20.2% Declined E01014835 25.4% Declined 28.1%

WsM East - Mendip Road E01014809 21.9% Declined E01014809 23.0% Declined 24.3%

WsM West - Birnbeck E01014841 23.5% Improved E01014841 20.8% Declined 21.3%

WsM North Worle - Magdalen Way E01014827 23.7% Declined E01014827 27.5% Declined 28.9%

WsM Clarence & Uphill - Severn Avenue E01014807 29.1% Improved E01014807 27.4% Declined 37.2%

WsM South - Brighton Road E01014830 25.3% Declined E01014830 31.6% Declined 33.6%

WsM East - Earlham Grove E01014811 27.2% Declined E01014811 31.3% Improved 31.1%

WsM West - Cecil Road E01014843 35.0% Declined E01014843 35.4% Declined 36.1%

WsM Milton & Old Worle - Milton Park Road E01014815 35.5% Improved E01014815 31.4% Declined 35.0%

WsM South Worle - Mead Vale E01014840 41.9% Improved E01014840 38.9% Declined 45.1%

Pill - West E01014786 35.6% Declined E01014786 43.7% Declined 48.7%

Kewstoke - Coast E01014774 37.1% Declined E01014774 43.9% Declined 48.9%

Banwell & Winscombe - Banwell Village E01014746 40.4% Declined E01014746 48.1% Improved 41.1%

Clevedon Central - Oldville Avenue E01014751 41.5% Declined E01014751 43.3% Improved 42.5%

Clevedon East - Teignmouth Road E01014753 43.4% Declined E01014753 47.8% Improved 42.3%

WsM South Worle - Silverberry Road E01014836 46.7% Declined E01014836 47.6% Declined 52.2%

Portishead South & North Weston - Severn Road E01014795 42.8% Declined E01014795 53.1% Declined 53.5%

WsM Clarence & Uphill - Uphill Road North E01014804 44.2% Declined E01014804 55.2% Improved 54.9%

WsM East - Garsdale Road E01014812 45.4% Declined E01014812 57.1% Improved 56.8%

WsM Milton & Old Worle - Greenwood Road E01014820 45.9% Declined E01014820 52.4% Declined 55.5%

WsM West - Montpelier E01014846 53.0% Improved E01014846 50.5% Declined 60.2%

Nailsea North & West - Silver Street E01014781 54.8% Declined E01014781 56.0% Declined 61.8%

Congresbury - East E01014764 57.3% Improved E01014764 51.9% Declined 60.4%

WsM East - Chesham Road E01014813 58.5% Declined E01014813 58.9% Declined 59.9%

Hutton & Locking - Bleadon E01014772 60.8% Improved E01014772 59.1% Improved 57.9%

WsM South Worle - Gannet Road E01014838 61.4% Improved E01014838 59.0% Declined 66.4%

Yatton - Mendip Road E01014860 61.8% Improved E01014860 56.0% Declined 58.7%

WsM Clarence & Uphill - Selbourne Road E01014808 63.6% Improved E01014808 59.9% Declined 60.2%

WsM North Worle - Lisle Road E01014826 67.6% Improved E01014826 54.3% Declined 59.7%

Clevedon North - Hallam Road E01014755 75.3% Improved E01014755 58.5% Declined 68.5%

Clevedon Central - Queens Road E01014750 52.5% Declined E01014750 66.4% Improved 56.2%

Nailsea North & West - Southfield Road E01014780 57.7% Declined E01014780 63.3% Declined 65.0%

Hutton & Locking - RAF Locking/East E01014769 59.8% Declined E01014769 61.0% Declined 64.0%

Banwell & Winscombe - Banwell West E01014744 60.1% Declined E01014744 65.3% Improved 60.8%

Clevedon South - Hallswell Road E01014756 61.0% Declined E01014756 62.4% Declined 64.1%

WsM South Worle - Bransby Way E01014839 61.3% Declined E01014839 65.3% Improved 62.1%

2007

Direction of

change in

IMD

percentile

from 2007 to

2010

Direction of

change in

IMD

percentile

from 2010 to

2015

2015 2010


LSOA Names

Post-2011

LSOA

CODE

Percent-

ile

Pre-2011

LSOA

CODE

Percent-

ile

Percent-

ile

Winford - Felton E01014848 62.1% Declined E01014848 66.5% Improved 65.7%

Clevedon Yeo - Bryant Gardens E01014763 62.2% Improved E01014763 60.1% Declined 64.7%

Nailsea North & West - North Street E01014783 63.8% Declined E01014783 64.8% Improved 64.5%

Hutton & Locking - Locking West/Hutton North E01014770 63.8% Improved E01014770 60.5% Declined 65.1%

Yatton - Kingston Seymour E01014858 64.9% Declined E01014858 65.3% Declined 67.7%

WsM West - Ashcombe Park E01014845 68.0% Improved E01014845 63.3% Declined 65.1%

WsM Milton & Old Worle - The Scaurs E01014817 68.3% Improved E01014817 68.0% Declined 71.7%

Banwell & Winscombe - Sandford E01014745 73.7% Improved E01014745 66.7% Declined 73.5%

WsM Clarence & Uphill - Totterdown Lane E01014805 75.6% Improved E01014805 61.4% Declined 61.7%

Wraxall & Long Ashton - Long Ashton West E01014851 82.4% Improved E01014851 69.3% Declined 73.9%

Yatton - North Yatton/Cleeve E01014856 63.7% Declined E01014856 70.6% Improved 67.7%

Wrington - East E01014854 71.9% Improved E01014854 70.5% Improved 56.0%

Backwell - Farleigh E01014740 72.0% Declined E01014740 79.5% Improved 61.5%

WsM North Worle - Looksbrook Road E01014821 73.0% Declined E01014821 77.1% Improved 76.3%

Kewstoke - Ebdon Grounds/Wick E01014773 74.4% Improved E01014773 74.2% Improved 72.9%

Banwell & Winscombe - Winscombe West E01014741 74.6% Declined E01014741 75.0% Declined 80.2%

Hutton & Locking - Hutton South E01014771 76.3% Declined E01014771 79.8% Improved 76.2%

Easton-in-Gordano - East E01014766 77.2% Improved E01014766 74.7% Improved 70.2%

Portishead West - West Hill E01014797 77.5% Improved E01014797 71.6% Improved 71.2%

Congresbury - West E01014765 78.7% Improved E01014765 77.8% Declined 80.8%

WsM Clarence & Uphill - Uphill Village E01014803 78.7% Improved E01014803 76.4% Improved 67.2%

Clevedon Walton - Castle Road E01014758 81.5% Improved E01014758 75.7% Improved 75.5%

WsM Milton & Old Worle - Westbrook Road E01014816 81.8% Improved E01014816 70.0% Declined 74.8%

Clevedon South - Kenn Moor Drive E01014757 83.8% Improved E01014757 78.8% Declined 82.8%

Winford - Winford/Dundry E01014847 66.4% Declined E01014847 80.3% Declined 82.4%

WsM North Worle - Savernake Road E01014824 71.4% Declined E01014824 82.8% Declined 82.9%

Clevedon West - St Andrews E01014760 72.6% Declined E01014760 81.8% Improved 80.5%

Wraxall & Long Ashton - Wraxall E01014852 80.0% Declined E01014852 85.9% Improved 77.0%

WsM North Worle - St Marks Road E01014825 80.9% Declined E01014825 85.2% Declined 85.7%

Blagdon & Churchill - Blagdon E01014747 81.0% Declined E01014747 83.2% Improved 76.9%

Clevedon North - Hill Road E01014754 81.1% Improved E01014754 80.5% Improved 76.6%

WsM Milton & Old Worle - Balmoral Way E01014819 82.1% Declined E01014819 87.4% Improved 82.9%

Backwell - West Town E01014739 83.0% Declined E01014739 86.6% Improved 80.9%

WsM North Worle - Taunton Road E01014823 83.4% Declined E01014823 87.9% Improved 84.4%

Yatton - Stowey Road E01014857 84.7% Improved E01014857 83.1% Declined 87.6%

Wraxall & Long Ashton - Failand E01014849 85.4% Improved E01014849 85.2% Improved 69.1%

Pill - East E01014787 85.4% Declined E01014787 86.4% Declined 86.9%

Portishead South & North Weston - Gordano SchoolE01014796 85.7% Improved E01014796 80.5% Improved 77.0%

Portishead Redcliffe Bay - Hillside Road E01014794 85.8% Improved E01014794 85.3% Declined 91.5%

Backwell - Station E01014738 86.1% Declined E01014738 89.3% Improved 79.3%

Yatton - Station E01014859 86.7% Improved E01014859 81.1% Improved 78.3%

Nailsea East - Blackthorn Way E01014779 86.9% Declined E01014779 88.6% Declined 90.1%

Portishead East - Brampton Way E01014792 87.3% Declined E01014792 89.5% Improved 87.6%

Clevedon East - Walton Road E01014752 88.1% Improved E01014752 83.1% Improved 79.3%

Clevedon Yeo - Chipping Cross E01014762 88.5% Improved E01014762 84.8% Declined 84.8%

Portishead Coast - Nore Road E01014789 89.3% Improved E01014789 86.3% Improved 85.2%

Clevedon West - Yeolands Drive E01014761 92.1% Improved E01014761 87.1% Improved 82.7%

Nailsea East - Whiteoak Way E01014777 93.3% Improved E01014777 89.9% Declined 90.8%

Wraxall & Long Ashton - Long Ashton East E01014850 94.1% Improved E01014850 88.8% Improved 86.9%

Blagdon & Churchill - Langford E01014748 85.1% Declined E01014748 90.7% Declined 91.1%

Nailsea North & West - Mizzymead E01014784 86.7% Declined E01014784 90.9% Improved 88.5%

2007

Direction of

change in

IMD

percentile

from 2007 to

2010

Direction of

change in

IMD

percentile

from 2010 to

2015

2015 2010


A spreadsheet showing a LSOA’s percentiles over time for each domain is available

on request.

LSOA Names

Post-2011

LSOA

CODE

Percent-

ile

Pre-2011

LSOA

CODE

Percent-

ile

Percent-

ile

Portishead Coast - Lake Road E01014790 87.5% Declined E01014790 91.3% Improved 89.5%

Wrington - South/West E01014853 87.8% Declined E01014853 95.3% Declined 97.1%

Nailsea North & West - St Marys Grove E01014785 90.5% Declined E01014785 95.5% Improved 94.3%

Portishead Redcliffe Bay - Weatherley Drive E01014793 91.1% Improved E01014793 90.2% Declined 95.9%

Nailsea North & West - Causeway View E01014782 92.3% Declined E01014782 95.9% Improved 93.4%

WsM Milton & Old Worle - Worlebury Hill Road E01014818 92.5% Improved E01014818 92.3% Declined 93.2%

Blagdon & Churchill - Churchill E01014749 92.8% Declined E01014749 96.5% Improved 93.8%

Nailsea East - Vynes Way E01014775 95.6% Declined E01014775 98.3% Improved 97.4%

WsM North Worle - Cornfields E01014822 95.7% Improved E01014822 95.3% Improved 94.6%

Nailsea East - Winchcombe Close E01014776 95.9% Declined E01014776 97.6% Improved 95.4%

Yatton - Claverham E01014855 96.8% Improved E01014855 90.2% Improved 87.4%

Banwell & Winscombe - Winscombe East E01014742 97.9% Improved E01014742 97.7% Improved 95.9%

Portishead West - Merlin Park E01014798 98.0% Improved E01014798 97.5% Declined 98.4%

Easton-in-Gordano - West E01014767 98.3% Improved E01014767 96.5% Improved 91.6%

Nailsea East - Rickford Road E01014778 98.7% Improved E01014778 97.0% Declined 97.3%

Clevedon Walton - Dial Hill E01014759 99.1% Improved E01014759 98.3% Improved 95.9%

Backwell - Dark Lane/Church Town E01014737 99.9% Improved E01014737 99.3% Improved 98.3%

Banwell and Winscombe - Station Road E01032666 60.2% Declined E01014743 68.4% Improved 58.4%

Banwell and Winscombe - Willow Close E01032667 72.6% Improved

Banwell and Winscombe - Dunedin Way E01032668 70.6% Improved

Gordano - The Finches E01032674 87.7% Improved E01014768 74.7% Improved 69.1%

Gordano - Tickenham E01032680 75.9% Improved

Portishead Central - Lockside E01032675 93.8% Improved E01014788 87.4% Improved 84.7%

Portishead Central - Marina E01032676 90.2% Improved

Portishead Central - High Street E01032681 73.5% Declined

Portishead East - Sanderling Place E01032677 65.0% Declined E01014791 99.5% Improved 97.7%

Portishead East - Village Square E01032678 99.7% Improved

Portishead East - Conference Avenue E01032682 82.2% Declined

WsM East - Carousel Lane E01032669 54.8% Declined E01014814 76.5% Declined 78.3%

WsM East - Montacute Circus E01032670 60.3% Declined

WsM East - Longridge Way E01032671 60.9% Declined

WsM East - Aspen Park Road E01032679 59.9% Declined

WsM South Worle - West Wick E01032672 71.5% Improved E01014837 53.9% Improved 53.7%

WsM South Worle - Elmham Way E01032673 31.8% Declined

2007

Direction of

change in

IMD

percentile

from 2007 to

2010

Direction of

change in

IMD

percentile

from 2010 to

2015

2015 2010


APPENDIX 4

Proportion of North Somerset's children and older people who live in areas within each deprivation decile

IMD Decile

(1= Most Deprived)

Total

population

(mid 2012)

Percent-

age

Grouped

Percent-

age

Dependent

Children

aged 0-15

(mid 2012)

Percent-

age

Grouped

Percent-

age

Older

population

aged 60 and

over

(mid 2012)

Percent-

age

Grouped

Percent-

age

1 13,563 7% 2,416 7% 3,269 6%

2 7,374 4% 1,322 4% 2,062 4%

3 11,060 5% 1,918 5% 2,680 5%

4 7,427 4% 1,175 3% 2,336 4%

5 13,186 6% 2,253 6% 4,358 7%

6 14,868 7% 2,917 8% 3,891 7%

7 31,199 15% 6,171 17% 7,863 13%

8 29,596 14% 5,173 14% 9,269 16%

9 44,981 22% 8,110 22% 13,794 24%

10 31,131 15% 5,547 15% 9,069 15%

Grand Total 204,385 100% 37,002 100% 58,591 100%

25%

75%

25%

75%

26%

74%


APPENDIX 5

Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015 for Electoral Wards compared to all English Electoral Wards

IMD:

Overall -

%

ranking

Income

Deprivation

- % ranking

Employ-

ment - %

ranking

Education

Skills and

Training

Deprivation

- % ranking

Health

Deprivation

and

Disability -

% ranking

Crime -

%

ranking

Barriers to

Housing

and

Services -

% ranking

Living

Environ-

ment

Deprivation

- % ranking

Weston-super-Mare Bournville 1.3% 0.6% 1.1% 1.9% 2.7% 8.3% 69.3% 43.0%

Weston-super-Mare Central 2.6% 4.6% 0.8% 18.4% 1.8% 4.2% 76.2% 13.5%

Weston-super-Mare Hillside 13.2% 17.0% 9.3% 30.3% 12.5% 23.1% 37.4% 16.7%

Weston-super-Mare Mid Worle 31.2% 21.1% 23.9% 18.1% 34.9% 46.4% 72.8% 70.1%

Weston-super-Mare Milton 33.1% 27.4% 19.6% 28.1% 28.4% 43.0% 95.4% 56.0%

Weston-super-Mare Uphill 40.5% 33.2% 23.2% 44.7% 32.0% 48.7% 87.4% 81.0%

Weston-super-Mare Winterstoke 42.8% 34.6% 48.2% 33.1% 49.0% 38.5% 22.9% 80.7%

Weston-super-Mare South Worle 46.1% 35.4% 35.5% 35.1% 41.6% 35.4% 83.0% 83.7%

Clevedon South 56.5% 55.6% 47.5% 41.7% 41.7% 75.1% 57.5% 50.5%

Clevedon East 59.0% 45.6% 42.6% 49.8% 55.9% 57.1% 82.8% 59.9%

Pill 61.9% 56.4% 52.3% 58.8% 57.7% 57.4% 58.2% 59.7%

Weston-super-Mare Kewstoke 62.3% 51.3% 43.3% 56.8% 51.1% 57.6% 75.2% 84.2%

Hutton & Locking 63.5% 57.7% 45.4% 55.8% 56.8% 63.3% 33.4% 96.6%

Clevedon West 65.0% 49.6% 42.6% 82.6% 40.1% 66.0% 95.4% 50.2%

Nailsea Yeo 66.2% 51.3% 45.4% 47.3% 55.4% 77.4% 65.1% 93.0%

Weston-super-Mare North Worle 66.3% 45.6% 53.0% 52.1% 50.5% 44.8% 91.7% 90.0%

Winford 67.2% 89.1% 83.7% 73.9% 62.3% 32.7% 12.5% 50.5%

Banwell & Winscombe 68.4% 55.6% 51.6% 63.1% 59.5% 80.5% 48.4% 80.2%

Congresbury & Puxton 71.9% 52.4% 63.2% 73.8% 71.7% 62.1% 36.3% 74.4%

Wick St Lawrence & St Georges 73.5% 48.8% 56.2% 59.2% 62.9% 68.3% 58.4% 98.0%

Yatton 74.4% 62.3% 57.0% 60.6% 62.8% 78.4% 66.8% 72.6%

Nailsea West End 79.7% 81.1% 71.9% 68.3% 71.0% 94.3% 21.5% 78.2%

Clevedon Yeo 84.2% 72.3% 74.0% 43.8% 72.2% 84.8% 67.0% 92.4%

Portishead West 85.2% 81.1% 80.5% 77.8% 79.3% 94.3% 26.0% 94.5%

Portishead North 90.4% 80.0% 86.8% 94.5% 72.0% 43.8% 75.5% 81.4%

Long Ashton 90.5% 88.3% 86.8% 82.6% 75.5% 54.7% 57.8% 74.1%

Blagdon & Churchill 91.0% 90.5% 91.0% 94.1% 81.7% 80.6% 38.4% 45.1%

Wrington 91.1% 88.3% 92.0% 88.3% 82.5% 66.7% 41.8% 65.3%

Portishead South 91.1% 82.7% 76.5% 79.5% 52.9% 78.6% 80.7% 91.0%

Portishead East 91.4% 78.4% 91.0% 77.1% 66.4% 78.8% 83.6% 88.4%

Gordano Valley 91.8% 95.4% 88.4% 86.8% 83.8% 78.3% 29.1% 72.7%

Clevedon Walton 93.7% 92.5% 81.6% 98.0% 67.9% 96.1% 53.2% 81.2%

Backwell 96.0% 91.4% 89.0% 94.3% 83.3% 78.0% 78.6% 81.7%

Nailsea Youngwood 97.1% 92.5% 92.6% 74.1% 84.7% 79.4% 76.9% 96.0%

Nailsea Golden Valley 97.1% 96.7% 96.2% 97.7% 81.0% 91.2% 29.5% 99.4%

Electoral Ward

The English Indices of Deprivation 2015 Briefing Note ...

Documents

Transcript of The English Indices of Deprivation 2015 Briefing Note ...