The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition

THE EFFICIENCY OF MEMORABILITY AND

DIFFERENT SENSATIONAL RECOGNITION

Preyanan Larbanantaphol M.4/4 No.4Ratima Vangsawang M.4/4 No.7

INTRODUCTIONBefore we memorize, we must

receive information in brain. There are many methods to receive information such as; listening, watching, touching etc.

INTRODUCTIONThe mind deals with various kinds of

information. We also use language to think. but human memory holds other kinds of information too. For example, it can store information as mental pictures. The images can also be experienced in other sensory forms. A special kind of dynamic imagery is experienced like movies inside the head. You may be able to replay experiences from your past like a mental video (E.Martinez, 2006).

CEREBRUM

http://sitysat.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!977D9156A7C78D2!500.entry

http://www.besthealth.com/besthealth/bodyguide/reftext/html/nerv_sys_fin.html

FRONTAL LOBE { ABOUT MEMORY }

http://www.strokesurvivors.ca/new/FrontalLobe.php

TEMPORAL LOBE AND MIDBRAIN { ABOUT LISTENING }

http://benkimball.vox.com/library/post/qotd-time-travel.html

OCCIPITAL LOBE { ABOUT WATCHING }

http://www.strokesurvivors.ca/new/OccipitalLobe.php

INTRODUCTIONThe purposes are to study about the

relations between the method to receive information and the efficiency of memorability.

MATERIAL AND METHOD First, sampling the volunteers by

random the students in Mahidol Wittayanusorn School, twenty men and twenty women in grade 10 and 11 participated in the study. Recording data, then analyze the data by using anova. Finally, draw a conclusion.

MATERIAL AND METHOD For data collecting, test the volunteers

for 3 steps, the first step is letting these people remember a ten number ( two digit number ) given by watching within two seconds per number.

MATERIAL AND METHOD Ten seconds later, asking them to write

the number as much as they can remember within one minute.

MATERIAL AND METHOD The next step is doing as the first step

but change the method to given the numbers by leads participant listen.

MATERIAL AND METHOD For last step, participants were

manipulated both watching and listening ( the numbers in each step is differently).

10 NUMBERS Ten numbers were chosen by random

number program. listening

watching both

9 53 4210 62 1556 63 9276 43 1193 82 6717 10 2681 85 6439 18 8970 71 2752 80 69

RESULTS

GRADE 10 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN

ANOVA

Source of

Variation SS df MS F

P-value F crit

Sample 2.7 1 2.7

2.015717

0.158407

3.92433

Columns

45.51667 2

22.75833

16.9905

3.48E-07

3.075853

Interaction 3.05 2 1.525

1.138507

0.323911

3.075853

Within 152.7 1141.339474

Total203.9667 119

GRADE 11 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN

ANOVA

Source of


P-value F crit

Sample

4.408333 1

4.408333

4.186172

0.043056

3.92433

Columns

36.35 2

18.175

17.25906

2.83E-07

3.075853

Interaction

4.516667 2

2.258333

2.144523

0.121826

3.075853

Within120.05 114

1.05307

Total165.325 119

MEN AND WOMENANOVA

Source of


P-value F crit

Sample

7.004167 1

7.004167

5.920618

0.015715

3.881505

Columns

80.85833 2

40.42917

34.17475

9.52E-14

3.034414

Interaction

6.808333 2

3.404167

2.87754

0.058267

3.034414

Within

276.825 234

1.183013

Total371.4958 239

GRADE 10 AND 11ANOVA

Source of


P-value F crit

Sample

2.204167 1

2.204167

1.794468

0.181682

3.881505

Columns

80.85833 2

40.42917

32.91441

2.54E-13

3.034414

Interaction

1.008333 2

0.504167

0.410455

0.663825

3.034414

Within

287.425 234

1.228312

Total371.4958 239

GRADE 10 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For Sex H0 : There is no different

between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s pointsFrom F = = = 2.0157166

Fα = 3.92433If F > Fα then reject H0

Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points

GRADE 10 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For different sensational reception H0 :

There is no different between the variance of point from different sensation receptionFrom F = = = 16.99049


Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of point from different sensation reception

GRADE 10 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For Sex and different sensational reception H0 :

There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different wayFrom F = = = 1.1385


Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way

GRADE 11 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For Sex H0 : There is no difference



Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points

GRADE 11 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For different sensational reception H0 :




GRADE 11 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For Sex and different sensational reception H0 :




MEN AND WOMEN For Sex H0 : There is no different



Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points

MEN AND WOMEN For different sensational reception H0 :




MEN AND WOMEN For Sex and different sensational reception H0 :




GRADE 10 AND 11 For Grade H0 : There is no different



Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points

GRADE 10 AND 11 For different sensational reception H0 :




GRADE 10 AND 11 For grade and different sensational reception H0 :




RESULTS

F-value For sex

For different sensation

al reception

For sex and different sensational reception

Grade 10 2.01572

16.99049 1.1385

Grade 11 4.1862 17.2591 2.8775Men and women

5.9206 34.1747 2.8775For sex

For different sensation

al reception

For sex and different sensational reception

Grade 10 ND D NDGrade 11 D D NDMen and women

D D ND

Table shows the different between the variance of points in grade 10, grade 11 & men and women

Table shows F-value of points in grade 10,grade 11 & men and women

RESULTS

F-value For grade

For different sensational reception

For grade and different

sensational reception

Grade 10 & grade 11

1.7945 32.9144 0.4105

For grade

For different

sensational reception

For grade and different sensational

reception

Grade 10 & grade 11

ND D ND

Table shows F-value of points in grade 10&11

Table shows the different between the variance of points in grade 10&11

CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION The difference of sensational reception

affect the efficiency of memorability . The best way to receive information is watching, listening and both in order .

CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION However, in most studies in which

verbal items have been rated, information about sex differences is scarce (e.g., Paivio et al., 1968; Rubin & Friendly, 1986).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This mini project could not be successful

without assistance and suggestions from Aj.Usa Jeenjenkit, Aj.Sirimard Sukprasert, Aj.Washirasorn Saengsuwan and Aj.Pornmongkol Jimlim. Thanks for our volunteers that make our project finish successfully.

REFERENCES Vadim Kotelnikov (2009).The Way Our Mind

Works. Retrieved from www.1000ventures. com/business.../mind_how-it-works.html

Lisa, C. & Murray, T. M. (2010). Verbal and Spatial Short-term Memory. Retrieved from

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a741927340

Lisa, M. B., Jeanette, A. (2008). An investigation of sex differences in word ratings across

concrete, abstract, and emotion words. Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/ articles/mi_hb3538/is_3_58/ai_n29459215/

REFERENCES Short-term memory (n.d.). In wikipedia.

Retrieved 23 August 2010 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short-term_memory

Walter, J. F. (1991).The Physiology of Perception Retrieved from http://sulcus.berkeley.edu /FLM/MS/Physio.Percept.html

QUESTIONS ??

The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition

Documents

Transcript of The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition