The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive...
Transcript of The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive...
![Page 1: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The economics of climate change and scarce resources
Dimitri Zenghelis*
*Visiting Senior Fellow at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the
Environment; Senior Economic Advisor to Cisco; Associate Fellow of the Energy, Environment and Development Programme at Chatham House,
International Conference on Low Carbon Energy and Economy
Taipei, May 2012.
![Page 2: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Growth and resources
• Economics is about welfare maximisation subject to constraints
• How can human well-being be maximised s.t. projected constraints?
• Requires defining welfare:
– GDP or something else?
– Valuing non market variables
– Predicting relative prices
– Valuation across time and distance (value judgements e.g. discounting)
• Requires understanding resource constraints:
– Scientific projections
– Technological projections and substitution opportunities
– Risks and probability distribution
• Policy tools designed to match the market failure.
2
![Page 3: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Economics to inform policy choices
Decision-making under uncertainty:
• What should be our goals and policies for managing resource
depletion and associated risks?
• How much risk to accept?
• How big the response and what are the likely costs/investments?
• How to create credible policies to foster change?
• What are the roles of different players?
These are some of the relevant policy questions we must ask.
3
![Page 4: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Growth, but of what (I)?
• Gross domestic product (GDP) – a measure of the market
value of the flow (eg annual) of final goods and services.
• Excludes:
– (or roughly approximates) consequentialist non-market value, (eg
environment and health);
– Other non-consequentialist determinants of human welfare, eg security,
rights, opportunities, fairness and equity.
• Not a measure of wealth or assets (no account for degradation
of natural assets and biodiversity)
• But, is a known quantity, understood and consistently
measured, so stick with GDP...
4
![Page 5: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Growth, but of what (II)?
• Evidence suggests GDP gains correlate with:
– happiness (Coyle 2010).
– reduction in poverty (Kanbur 2001 Collier, 2007)
– gender equality, tolerance, social mobility, physical/mental health and
education opportunities, rule of law, lower crime/conflict.
– Correlation not causalities. Causalities bi-directional and reinforcing.
• GDP a gauge of social welfare, esp in poorer societies.
• But no informative assessment can be reduced to a single
dimension or metric such as output or happiness.
• Therefore, more practical/informative to adopt a “dashboard”
of indicators in addition to GDP including human development
indices such as health, education, environment, happiness,
freedom of expression, and transparency.
5
![Page 6: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Is sustainable growth possible?
• For welfare to continue to rise with economic growth, growth must
damage the environment at slower rate; eventually preserve the some
stock level of natural capital altogether (absolute decoupling).
• Is this feasible?
• Even in a materially stationary state, indefinite growth in well-being is
possible because of progress in the intellectual economy.
• Adam Smith argued that the division of labour is limited by the extent of
the market (Smith, 1776), and economic growth enlarges markets and
permits greater specialisation and variety; increasing returns to scale
stimulate economic growth (Young, 1928).
• Others adopt ‘Malthusian’ view (Tinbergen and Hueting 1992, Jackson
2009) and argue economy will eventually reach a stationary state.
6
![Page 7: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
TFP and innovation
Thankfully, intellectual economy infinite and weightless.
• GDP a function of factor inputs (people, capital and materials) in
production process ALSO processes, techniques, and technologies with
which inputs used = Total Factor Productivity (TFP).
• Growth accounting shows economic growth in rich countries stems
almost entirely from TFP growth (Aghion and Howitt 1998; Jorgensen
2007, Aghion 2011 and Acemoglu 2010).
• Second law of thermodynamics doesn’t apply to ideas.
• Knowledge and innovation which drive TFP and are dynamic concepts.
• New equipment enables new ideas and better technologies. For example,
investing in computers induces bright ideas on how to use them.
• Means increasing returns to scale in production, where investment in
knowledge begets increased output and resources for further investment;
a virtuous-growth spiral known as endogenous growth.
7
![Page 8: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Endogenous growth opportunities
• Path-dependency means policymakers can steer growth path and
focus on the factors that generate knowledge and induce innovation if
they are to drive economic growth (Zenghelis 2011).
• The effects of ICT revolution are comparable and probably bigger
than those of steam or electricity. Can vastly increase resource
efficiency, monitoring and management.
• There is no previous example of a new technology whose price has fallen
so fast, or which has diffused through the economy as rapidly, as
innovations in computers and mobile communication.
• Means relative decoupling (GDP growth > resource use growth) has
begun in advanced societies (Jackson 2009).
• Unit resource intensity fallen driven by incentives to innovate .
• But strong sustainability requires transition to absolute decoupling.
• Ability to achieve absolute decoupling and growth depends on
innovation and substitution opportunities.
8
![Page 9: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Economics of resource substitutability
• Scope for substitutes? Energy easy electrons ultimately from sun.
Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition
• Pricing can staunch the rebound effect.
• But essential ‘elements’ (minerals like phosphorus, potassium, arable land,
soil, biodiversity, water) hard to substitute.
• Until a decade ago, there appeared to be empirical support for the view that
commodities were becoming more economically abundant (Johnson, 2000),
given the long-term trend of declining commodity, food, mineral, energy
prices over the 20th century (Dobbs, Oppenheim and Thompson, 2011).
• Past decade: reversal of century long commodity price declines.
• Growing demand from developing world middle classes (esp Asia).
• Supply increasing to meet demand but prices likely to remain higher: the
characteristics of this resource crunch differ from previous periods.
9
![Page 10: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The technical opportunity
• Rising prices of resources have derailed many past recoveries and
growth episodes
• But greater efficiency can reduce pressure on these prices. (King 2012,
HSBC 2012).
• McKinsey&Co (2011) indicate 15 areas where there is great scope for
improvement in efficiency, including: energy efficiency in the built
environment; increasing yields on large-scale farms; reducing food
waste; reducing municipal water leakage; increasing transport fuel
efficiency; reducing land degradation; improving irrigation techniques;
and improving the efficiency of power plants. – See also, e.g. “Sustainable Materials - with Both Eyes Open: Future Buildings, Vehicles, Products and
Equipment - Made Efficiently and Made with Less New Material” http://withbotheyesopen.com/
• See Annex for commercial opportunities from the ‘green race’.
10
![Page 11: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Where are we heading?
• Developed world may reduce-resource intensity by
2030.
• China and India will account for much of the increase
in resource demand, simply on weight of population
numbers and economic growth rates.
• Africa may be approaching 2 billion people by 2030.
• Without intensification of resource reduction
around the world, including technological leap-
frogging to resource-efficiency in developing world,
absolute decoupling not possible.
11
![Page 12: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The structure of the science has key implications
• The scale, uncertainty, lags and the ‘publicness’ of the problem make
the politics and economics of policy very difficult (Stern 2012).
• risk-management on a great scale and over long periods.
• To present a convincing case for inaction or delay you have to show you
are: – confident that the risks are small, or;
– the risks of delay are small, or;
– that a magic antidote will be discovered, or;
– care little about the future (notwithstanding that BAU likely to lead to impoverishment of
many or most).
• Science/ethics suggest narrow CBA based on one-good model of
underlying growth can provide only part of the story (Romani et al 2010).
• Need broad risk-management approach, which is based on sound
economics and transparent ethics, rather than give undue precision.
12
![Page 13: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
How we cast the economic policy responses
• Must recognise the dynamics - delay is dangerous. Not like trade
negotiations (Stern 2011).
• Delaying or postponing coordinated climate policies is dangerous:
– Irreplaceable and non-substitutable resources depleted.
– Stock-flow of greenhouse gases.
– Lock in to high resource intensity:
infrastructure/cities/technologies/institutions/culture…
• Costly to unwind/replace infrastructure quickly retrospectively.
• Easier to manage transition and work with investment depreciation cycle.
13
![Page 14: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The scale and costs of necessary investment (I)
• Expenditure must be analysed as an investment, rather than only
a net cost (many co-benefits).
• Inevitability of uncertainty as learning and discovery are central.
• Not simply static shift to higher input-output/coefficients and lower
growth. CGE models do not capture the story (Stern 2012). .
• Many narrow input-output models fail to adequately reflect crucial
parts of the crux of the policy problem and the empirical realities,
particularly the scope for co-benefits.
• Thus they essentially assume (not deduce) resource efficient
investment detrimental to growth and deduce that any action is
simply a cost and (dis)orient discussion to “affordability”. Weak
economics.
14
![Page 15: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The scale and costs of necessary investment (III)
• “Co-benefits” include:
– Energy and resource efficiency gains (see work on efficiency by McKinsey 2011 and
also WEF 2012);
– Technological change,
– Greater energy security.
– Reduced pollution
– Greater bio-boidiversity.
– benefits beyond narrow GDP (e.g. migration/conflict/ill health/liberty/human suffering).
• Realising these overall benefits from investments and managing costs
will depend on how we manage market failures and how we work
together as a community.
• Induced innovation: the benefits of learning are already appearing,
e.g. factor of 5-6 fall in solar PV capital costs in last 5 years or so.
• Policies must be made attractive and convenient rather than coercive
and complex for households.
• Bad or not credible policy raises costs.
15
![Page 16: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The new industrial revolution?
• Will require strong action and major investment in all regions of world and in all
economic sectors. Economy-wide, recasting of buildings, transportation, agriculture,
manufacturing, communications, IT, …
• Economic history tells us these periods of change are characterised by two types of
countries, “those where the new industries are being deployed, and those areas of
the world that are left out and falling behind” (Perez, 2002). Investment flows to the
pioneers. Perez analysis follows that of Chris Freeman who followed Schumpeter.
• Could bring two or three decades of dynamic, innovative and creative growth,
and large and growing markets (see Perez, 2002 and 2010).
• “Investment concentrates in these core countries, where the whole economy is
flourishing and opportunities across the complete industrial spectrum now abound. It
is the time of aggressive exports from the core countries.” (Perez, 2002)
• Both the transition to the low-carbon economy and a low-carbon growth path look
attractive. If UK moves with Europe as a whole even greater opportunities for new
sources of low-carbon investment, growth and development.
16
![Page 17: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Waves of innovation
17
1ST WAVE
Industrial
(1770-1830) 2ND WAVE
Steam & Railways
(1830-1870) 3RD WAVE
Steel, Electricity
& Heavy Engineering
(1875-1920) 4TH WAVE
Oil, Automobiles
& Mass Production
(1910-1975) 5TH WAVE
Information
& Telecom
(1971-)
INN
OV
AT
ION
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
Cleantech
& Biotech (2009-)
6TH WAVE
Source: DONG Energy (2009); diagram based on Perez (2002) drawing on
report by Merrill Lynch (2008) (schematic not precise quantitative vertical axis).
![Page 18: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Policy – market failure (I)
• Policy for the market failures. Different failures point to different instruments, but the collection is mutually reinforcing (Bowen et al 2010):
– Mispriced resources: carbon taxes / cap-and-trade / regulation / fish;
– Inefficiency and waste: XXX
– R,D&D (research, development and deployment): tax breaks, research grants,
feed-in tariffs (FIT) for deployment;
– Imperfection in risk/capital markets: risk sharing/reduction through
guarantees, equity, feed-in tariffs, floors on carbon prices. FIT straddles first 3
imperfections;
– Networks: electricity grids, public transport, broadband, community-based
insulation schemes. Government frameworks needed;
– Information: labelling and information requirements on cars, domestic
appliance, products more generally. Awareness of options;
– Co-benefits: valuing ecosystems and biodiversity, valuing energy security,
regulation of dirty and more dangerous technologies.
18
![Page 19: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Policy – market failure (II)
• Markets work best when: minimal monopoly of power; information is
symmetric; buyers and sellers both know what they are getting into;
barriers to entry are low; coordination failures can be overcome; all the
costs of production, including social and environmental costs reflected.
• Without properly valuing natural assets, it is hard to prevent overuse
and depletion of scarce resources, especially ones owned in common,
such as fish in the ocean or clean air.
• The absence of appropriate pricing of environmental goods means they
are over-consumed, and we are unable to easily measure their value.
This has distorted the development of advanced economies to make
them far too hungry for such resources.
• Dynamic public policy analysis required to deal with the issues of
fostering a transition on this scale (a 21st century view of economics).
Much market failure analysis à la Pigou is comparative statics, but
nevertheless basic to policy.
19
![Page 20: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Policy – market failure (III)
• Inevitably some uncertainty as learning and discovery are central.
• Policymakers need to:
– tackle market failures especially those relating to mis-priced resources and
inefficiency and that lead to insufficient R&D spending by the private sector,
– help firms reap increasing returns to scale by supporting new networks.
– Shift tax base towards materials and resources, and away from intellectual
activity.
• Policy to promote learning must be managed in a flexible but predictable
way.
• Policy must be clear and credible with structured and predictable
provisions for flexible adjustment as scale/learning builds - policy risk is
very costly. Bad policy could raise costs substantially.
20
![Page 21: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Political economy (I)
• Action involves radical change; there will be dislocation and winners and losers
– not all ‘win-win’
• Losers easier to identify; will lobby hard against action. Winners potential and
diffuse. Asymmetry in political influence. Vested interests will oppose change:
“merchants of doubt” industry.
• Policy must practically manage change, support, re-skill and retool threatened
sectors? This explains the
• People ready to act responsibly if they understand the scale of risks to future
generations and have clear sight what can be done.
• It is vital therefore to understand the political economy of change, problems in
communication and misinformation, and the role of public opinion.
• Open public discussion and engagement and building a common understanding
is essential for democratic choice, functional governance and the sustainability of
actions.
• Many barriers to early action are cultural, institutional, political not technological
or economic. Changing social norms means resource-efficient activities will be
accepted in time (witness initial response to smoking, seatbelts and drink driving).
21
![Page 22: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Political economy (II)
• Global public good means international interaction is crucial.
• ‘Bottom-up’ local and national action reinforces/and is
reinforced by ‘top-down’ international agreements.
– easier to sell local action when others are moving strongly;
– equally it is easier to make demands at the international negotiating table when you
can point to effective domestic action.
• International agreements on overfishing, climate change and
resource depletion, have been slow and imperfect, but far from
ineffective. This is because this is not just about narrow free-
riding/gaming. There is a positive sum game from collective
action.
• Benefits and market opportunities to managing that transition early.
Examples abound of a healthy green race - China, Korea, various
European countries and states and cities in the US.
22
![Page 23: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The size of the ‘green’ opportunity • Even in the present uncertain global green policy environment with lack
of ambitious, coordinated policy response:
– Renewable energy generation and energy efficiency investment has
quadrupled since 2004 according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF);
– New investment in clean energy surpassed investment in conventional
energy generation in 2010, rising to between US$180 and US$200 billion.
• HSBC forecasts the global low-carbon energy market (revenues) will triple to
US$ 2.2 trillion p.a. by 2020 (HSBC, 2010):
– Around US$10 trillion in cumulative capital investments required 2010-2020;
– Energy efficiency themes will surpass low-carbon power as the major
investment opportunity by 2020, including, electric vehicles;
• UK low-carbon and environmental goods and services sector had sales of
£116.8 billion in 2009-10, up 4.3 per cent from the previous year (BIS) and
placing us sixth in the global league table.
• Investors have to take a medium to long term view and high-carbon
investments are looking ever riskier.
23
![Page 24: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
How are countries moving? China
• China (around 7t/cap) - China’s 12th five-year plan represents a radical
change in strategy. It identifies three key new objectives: increasing the share
of consumption, moving to a low-carbon and less polluting economy,
increasing innovation and R&D (Stern, 2011).
• China already has a target to reduce emissions per unit of GDP (emissions
intensity) by 40–45% between 2005 and 2020, with a target of 17% during the
12th plan (2011-2015).
• The 12th plan seeks to achieve this change in part through massive
investment in seven strategic low-carbon and resource efficent industries, to
achieve a 15% share of the economy by 2020, compared with 3% now.
• A green race it intends to win.
24
![Page 25: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
How are countries moving? Korea
• Korea (12t/cap) has adopted a National Strategy and Five-Year
Plan for Green Growth.
• Involved a “Green New Deal” launched on 6 January 2009 as part of
a wider economic stimulus package. A total of US$ 30.7 billion
(about 80% of the package) was allocated (2009-2012) across a
range of low-carbon initiatives, including renewable energy, energy
efficiency, transport, and water and waste management.
• The five-year green growth plan 2009-2013 incorporates many
projects from the Green New Deal package.
• Outlines a set of three strategies, ten policy directions, and 50 core
projects to shift Korea onto a resource-efficient growth path. A total
of US$ 83.6 billion will be allocated to the plan, around 2 per cent of
GDP. See UNEP (2010) for a more detailed description of the plan.
25 Source: UNEP, 2010, Overview of the Republic of Korea’s Strategy for
Green Growth.
![Page 26: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
How are countries moving? US
• Much movement outside Washington DC:
– US Navy and biofuel trials. Target to run a “Great Green Fleet” by 2016, a carrier strike
group composed of nuclear ships and hybrid electric ships running only on biofuel (and
aircraft flying on biofuel). Ambitious 2020 target for 50% of total energy consumption,
ashore and afloat, to come from non-fossil fuel sources;
– California cap-and-trade scheme. Begins 1 January 2013;
– NYC green growth plan “plaNYC”: including target to reduce emissions 30% 2005-
2030, currently 13% below 2005 levels (US around 8% below);
– Texas: largest wind farm capacity of any US state at around 10GW (Iowa second
largest at around 4GW). Plans to double capacity by 2013. Attracting investment from
China;
– General Motors - new range extended electric vehicle, ‘Volt’ in US and ‘Ampera’ in EU.
• EPA Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) for power plants. Will force coal to adopt
more stringent pollution controls (many older and dirtier coal plants may close or convert
to gas). More rules proposed to regulate emissions, e.g. Cross-State Air Pollution Rule.
26
![Page 27: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Private saving and fiscal dis-saving
• Annual private sector net saving (investment-saving) at record levels.
• $1.1 trillion last year, equivalent to 7 per cent of US GDP (blue line) ~ confidence crisis.
• Recession a better time to steer investment than boom:
– Low resource costs/limited ‘crowding out’;
– No lack of private money (seeking low-risk profitable new markets);
– Perceived lack of opportunity and confidence
Sector financial balances*, % of GDP
United States United Kingdom
27
-12
-9
-6
-3
0
3
6
9
12
87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11
Private sector
Public sector
Current account balance
-12
-9
-6
-3
0
3
6
9
12
87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11
Private sector
Public sector
Current account balance
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis/Office of National Statistics, quarterly data to fourth quarter of 2011.
*net borrowing, or saving minus investment
![Page 28: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The potential power of policy credibility
• The role of environmental policies in setting expectations and providing
incentives to induce innovation is huge. Even modest and uncertain movement has
generated a strong response.
Innovation in climate change mitigation technologies
Patenting activity in Annex-I countries (3-year moving average, indexed on 1990=1.0)
Based on ‘claimed priorities’ (CP) deposited at any patent office worldwide, classified by technological field, from
identification developed by the EPO/OECD World Patent Statistics database (PATSTAT). OECD (2010).
28
![Page 29: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Credibility a prerequisite for confidence
• Private sector not investing as heavily as it could in resource efficiency
innovation/infrastructure because of a lack of confidence in future
returns in this policy-driven sector.
• The Government should incentivise low-carbon investment by itself taking
charge of the elements of the policy risk which it ‘controls’.
• By backing its own resource efficiency policies, the Government can
stimulate additional net private sector investment.
• For instance, by allowing the Green Investment Bank to operate as a
lending institution: its presence reduces policy risk and it is a more
trusted convenor and syndicator than a private investment bank (see
EBRD experience).
• Must not convey the (false) impression that we have to make a choice
between environmental responsibility and economic growth, he
undermines the confidence of private sector investments.
29
![Page 30: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Conclusion
• Absolute decoupling and growth feasible, desirable, profitable.
• Requires early action and strong domestic and international policy steer.
• Informed by economic analysis of risks, uncertainly, dynamics of path-dependency
and costs of delay (narrow CBA modeling won’t do).
• Indecision costly: risks the double failure of missing opportunity to lock-in new low-
carbon infrastructure and unnecessarily extending the economic crisis.
• Recession a better time to steer investment than boom.
• Credible long-term policy can reduce uncertainty, lower costs as well as drive
investment, restore growth and leave a lasting resource efficient legacy.
• Policymakers also need to:
– tackle market failures especially those relating to mis-priced resources and inefficiency
and that lead to insufficient R&D spending by the private sector.
– steer the creation of new markets and drive endogenous growth.
– help firms reap increasing returns to scale by supporting innovation and new networks.
– Shift tax base towards materials and resources, and away from intellectual activity.
30
![Page 31: The economics of climate change and scarce resources · Moore’s law in renewables; competitive soon; shale gas in transition • Pricing can staunch the rebound effect. • But](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050513/5f9d79d5818c8f079366f77f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Presentation to HM Treasury Stern and Zenghelis (forthcoming)
‘A strategy for restoring confidence and economic growth through
green investment and innovation’ Zenghelis 2012
http://www2.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publications/Policy/docs/PB-
Zenghelis-economic-growth-green-investment-innovation.pdf
‘Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures’ Stern (Feb 2012).
http://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/events/event.asp?id=140
‘Prosperity with Growth: Economic growth, climate change and
environmental limits’ Hepburn and Bowen (forthcoming).
These also include more comprehensive referencing.
31
References