The Early English Language Development Standards · Kindergarten through Grade 12, as the focus on...
Transcript of The Early English Language Development Standards · Kindergarten through Grade 12, as the focus on...
RESOURCE GUIDE
The Early English Language Development Standards2.5–5.5 YEARS2014 EDITION
INCLUDING
• Descriptions of the language dual language learners need to process and produce at three distinct and overlapping levels of English language development.
• Examples of receptive and expressive language use in the major areas of development and learning.
• Connections to State Early Learning Standards.
Copyright NoticeThe WIDA Early English Language Development Standards, Ages 2.5–5.5, 2014 Edition (“WIDA E-ELD Standards”) are owned by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System on behalf of WIDA. The WIDA E-ELD Standards are protected by United States copyright laws and may not be reproduced, modified, or distributed, including re-posting on the internet, without the prior written permission of the Wisconsin Center for Education Research (WCER) and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. The WIDA E-ELD Standards are for your personal, noncommercial use only. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright, or other notice from copies of this booklet.
Fair use of the WIDA E-ELD Standards includes reproduction for the purpose of teaching (including multiple copies for lesson/curricular planning). If you are not sure whether your use of this booklet and the WIDA E-ELD Standards falls within fair use or if you want permission to use the copyrighted WIDA E-ELD Standards for purposes other than personal or fair use, please contact WIDA Client Services at [email protected] or 1-866-276-7735.
The WIDA E-ELD Standards were developed by WIDA with support from the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care and the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
© 2014 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of WIDA— www.wida.us.
Version 1.1 Revised 6/5/17
1
ContentsSection 1: Introduction ...............................................................................................................3Connections to States’ Early Learning Standards and WIDA K-12 ELD Standards ..............................3Intended Audience ...............................................................................................................................3Intended Uses.......................................................................................................................................4
Section 2: Understanding the WIDA E-ELD Standards Framework .........................................5Developmentally Appropriate Academic Language ...............................................................................6Sociocultural Contexts .........................................................................................................................8Performance Definitions .......................................................................................................................9E-ELD Standards ...............................................................................................................................14Standards Matrices and Strands of Model Performance Indicators ......................................................17
Section 3: Strands of Model Performance Indicators ............................................................ 27The Language of Social and Emotional Development .........................................................................28The Language of Early Language Development and Literacy ..............................................................34The Language of Mathematics ............................................................................................................40The Language of Science ....................................................................................................................46The Language of Social Studies ...........................................................................................................52The Language of Physical Development .............................................................................................58
Appendix A: Glossary ............................................................................................................... 64
Appendix B: Selected References ............................................................................................ 68
2
Figures
A: A Graphical Representation of the WIDA Standards Framework ....................................................5B: The Features of Developmentally Appropriate Academic Language .................................................7C: Early English Language Development Performance Definitions – Receptive, Ages 2.5-4.5 ...........10D: Early English Language Development Performance Definitions – Receptive, Ages 4.5-5.5 ...........11E: Early English Language Development Performance Definitions – Expressive, Ages 2.5-4.5 ..........12F: Early English Language Development Performance Definitions – Expressive, Ages 4.5-5.5 ..........13G: The Correspondence Between the Five Dimensions of Children’s Development and
the E-ELD Standards ....................................................................................................................15H: The Early English Language Development Standards ....................................................................16I: Standard, Age Level, Example Topics, and Connection .................................................................18J: Topic List .....................................................................................................................................19K: Example Context for Language Use and Cognitive Function ........................................................20L: Expressive Domain and Levels ......................................................................................................21M: Level 3 Developing .......................................................................................................................21N: Language Supports for DLLs, Ages 2.5-5.5 ...................................................................................22O: Topic Related Language ................................................................................................................23P: Guiding Questions for the Components of the WIDA E-ELD Strands ........................................24Q: Template for Strands of MPIs .......................................................................................................25
3
OV
ERV
IEW
The WIDA Early English Language Development (E-ELD) Standards were specifically developed to help support the unique language needs of children ages 2.5-5.5 years who are in the process of learning more than one language prior to Kindergarten entry. These children are often referred to as dual language learners (DLLs). As the number of DLLs continues to grow in the United States, practitioners in both urban and rural settings can use their state Early Learning Standards (ELS) in conjunction with WIDA E-ELD Standards to effectively support, instruct, and assess these young children.
This resource guide introduces the WIDA E-ELD Standards and Framework to practitioners, professionals, and parents. The resource guide includes a discussion of each component of the framework as well as examples of language descriptors for each standard with the intention of helping practitioners see how the E-ELD Standards are used in a variety of authentic contexts in Early Care and Education (ECE) settings.
Connections to States’ Early Learning Standards and WIDA K–12 English Language Development StandardsThe WIDA E-ELD Standards align with existing WIDA English Language Development Standards for Kindergarten through Grade 12, as the focus on language development in both sets of standards is based on the same WIDA guiding principles and philosophy. Additionally, K–12 language development builds upon early language development, allowing practitioners the opportunity to plan for transitions related to language development for DLLs entering K–12 schools.
The WIDA E-ELD Standards also correspond to states’ ELS—the WIDA E-ELD Standards were created through the linguistic analysis of the Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework and states’ ELS to ensure E-ELD Standards include the language necessary for DLLs to participate in ECE settings in meaningful and relevant ways. As a consequence of the work on the alignment to WIDA K–12 ELD Standards and correspondence to ELS, the WIDA E-ELD Standards provide states a consistent and congruent framework for supporting and assessing the language development of DLLs across the United States.
The E-ELD Standards and accompanying resource guide are intended to be used together with states’ ELS so that practitioners plan and deliver age- and linguistically appropriate relevant instruction and assessment to DLLs at varying levels of English language development within standards-based curriculum.
Intended Audience The WIDA E-ELD Standards are designed to be used in a wide range of community- and school-based ECE programs that serve young DLLs, ages 2.5–5.5. Teachers and practitioners, teaching assistants, childcare providers, early childhood special education teachers, speech/language clinicians, and administrators might use the E-ELD Standards in a variety of ways for a variety of purposes.
SECTION 1: Introduction
4
OV
ERV
IEW
Intended UsesPractitioners in Head Start, child care, preschool, or early childhood special education programs might use the E-ELD Standards to help guide lesson planning to ensure that the different linguistic needs of DLLs are being met throughout their program day. For example, practitioners may use the E-ELD Standards to determine the kinds of language supports DLLs at different levels of English language development may need during large group early literacy or circle time activities, so that children understand and can participate with the entire group. Teaching assistants might also be enlisted to help provide various language supports to DLLs during small group learning activities, snack time, outdoor play, or free-choice play.
Practitioners can also refer to the E-ELD Standards for guidance on how to help DLLs reach the next level of English language development. The E-ELD Standards can be used to help practitioners plan meaningful ways to extend DLLs’ current level of English language development as the children simultaneously learn new concepts and skills within standards-based curriculum.
Teachers, child care providers, special educators or speech/language clinicians might also use E-ELD Standards to help inform standards-based assessments with DLLs, making sure that necessary language scaffolds are provided and that DLLs’ performance within the different developmental and content areas are properly interpreted. Special educators and/or speech/language clinicians might also use the E-ELD Standards to help determine the linguistic needs of DLLs with disabilities when writing individualized education program (IEP) goals and when helping DLLs with disabilities reach their IEP goals.
Finally, administrators might find the E-ELD Standards useful when making programmatic decisions about class composition, staffing, curriculum, and assessment in programs that serve young DLLs.
5
OV
ERV
IEW
The WIDA Standards Framework, depicted in Figure A, consists of a set of interactive and interdependent components that exemplify the WIDA vision for academic language development. This Framework is the foundation for WIDA’s work on the creation of language development standards. The five components are:
• WIDA Can Do Philosophy• Guiding Principles of Language Development• Developmentally Appropriate Academic Language in Sociocultural Contexts• Performance Definitions• Can Do Descriptors• Standards Matrices
Figure A: A Graphical Representation of the WIDA Standards Framework
The way in which the standards exemplify developmentally appropriate academic language and language development is founded on the WIDA Can Do Philosophy and Guiding Principles of Language Development. The Can Do Philosophy is based on the belief that all children bring to their learning cultural and linguistic practices, skills, and ways of knowing from their homes and communities. WIDA believes that an educator’s role is to design learning spaces and opportunities that capitalize on and build upon these assets. This belief is based on a synthesis of the literature related to working with culturally and linguistically diverse children. Using this work as a frame, WIDA drafted its Guiding Principles from a synthesis of literature and research related to language development and effective instructional practices for language learners. These Guiding Principles represent WIDA’s core beliefs about language development.
SECTION 2: Understanding the WIDA Standards Framework
Exemplifying the WIDA Can Do Philosophy
PerformanceDe�nitions
Standards & their Matrices
Guiding Principles of Language DevelopmentD
evel
opm
en
tally Appropriate Academic Language
in Sociocultural Contexts
6
OV
ERV
IEW
At the core of the WIDA Standards Framework are the Performance Definitions along with the six language development standards and their representative matrices. The Performance Definitions delineate what the various levels of language development look like, informed by the Features of Academic Language. The standards matrices help practitioners envision what language development might look like in ECE programs scaffolded across levels of language development within the six standards. These matrices are used in conjunction with the Performance Definitions to describe possible trajectories for DLLs’ language development. The Can Do Descriptors illustrate examples of what DLLs can do at each level of language development.
The components of the WIDA Standards Framework interact with and influence each other in the design of curricula, language instruction, and assessment of language learners. When used in tandem, the WIDA Standards Framework components help practitioners identify and understand the receptive and expressive language that DLLs need in order to meet performance benchmarks/indicators across state ELS. Specific consideration has been given to the nature of early language and cognitive development, family and community-based sociocultural contexts for language learning, and the psycholinguistic nature of second language acquisition in preschoolers who are still developing the foundational structures and rules of language. Educators and program leaders are encouraged to emphasize specific elements of the Framework in their language instruction to fit the specific needs of individual DLLs and contexts. In doing so, all stakeholders can participate in shaping the development of our increasingly diverse population.
The following sections focus on the components of the Framework as they apply to the E-ELD Standards and their use in curriculum, instruction, and assessment.
Developmentally Appropriate Academic LanguageBased in part on the WIDA Features of Academic Language for K–12, the E-ELD Features have been adapted and renamed to fit the unique characteristics of young DLLs’ developing linguistic abilities during the early preschool years. The features of social, instructional, and academic language are outlined for two language criteria: Linguistic Complexity and Language Usage. These criteria are used to define each level of English language development in the Performance Definitions. Figure B shows the Features of Developmentally Appropriate Academic Language.
• Linguistic Complexity refers to the quantity and variety of language used by DLLs at the discourse level. Language features such as the length of utterances/interactions and how DLLs understand and express their ideas are included in this category.
• Language Usage refers to the types and use of structures, phrases, and words. Some features in this language criterion are choice of intonation to convey meaning, types and variety of grammatical structures, match of language forms to purpose, specificity of word/phrase choice (vocabulary) and comprehensibility of language (forms, conventions, and fluency).
7
OV
ERV
IEW
Figure B: The Features of Developmentally Appropriate Academic Language
Language Criteria Features
Linguistic Complexity(Quantity and variety of oral language)
Variety and length of utterances and interactions
Understanding and expression of ideas
Language Usage(Types and use of oral language structures, phrases, and words)
Types and variety of grammatical structures
Match of language forms to purpose
Formulaic phrases and expressions
Choice of intonation to convey meaning
Interpretation and ability to construct meaning at word/phrase level
Specificity of word/phrase choice
Comprehensibility of language
The sociocultural contexts for language use involve the interaction between children and their language environments, encompassing …
• Register• Genre• Topic• Task/Situation• Participants’ identities and social roles• Speaker/Conversational partner
8
OV
ERV
IEW
Sociocultural ContextsAll young children learn language through the context of relationships with their primary caregivers during daily routines. Through repeated social interactions with parents, siblings, extended family members, childcare providers, early childhood teachers and practitioners, and peers, children learn to interpret and construct meaning through sounds, words, phrases, and sentences. Children also learn the cultural rules and roles for social engagement associated with their particular language through these meaningful interactions with important people in their lives. The sociocultural contexts for young children’s language learning occurs most often in their homes, extended family members’ homes, or in community-based ECE settings, which may or may not be located in or associated with public schools.
The term sociocultural context has multiple definitions in education research. For its use in the E-ELD Standards, WIDA defines sociocultural context as the setting in which communication occurs. Communication is shaped by the sociocultural contexts in which it takes place. The elements that define this setting within the WIDA Standards Framework include the register, the genre, the topic, the task or situation, and the participants’ identities and roles in learning
Register refers to the different ways in which language is used and how it varies depending on who is part of the communication. The ways in which children adjust language when talking to an adult versus when talking to each other is an example of register.
Genres refer to the specific and particular types of text or discourse, which are typically socially accepted for particular purposes. For example, recount and explanation are two different genres.
Topic refers to the theme in which learning takes place. A topic could be life cycles or shapes.
Task or situation refers to the specific activity in which children are engaged that elicits the processing or production of language. Examples could include anything from a read-aloud to a conversation with a peer while playing in the sensory table.
Identities refer to the individual, social, and shared identities that children negotiate in different contexts. These may shift or overlap to maximize the knowledge, practices, and language from home and the various communities to which they belong.
Roles refer to the positioning of the learner within learning environments or situations. For example, in a morning meeting, the children need to use their listening skills and process the information they hear. On the other hand, when it is the child’s turn, his or her role changes and so does his or her language use. Then, instead of only understanding and processing information, he or she will produce it.
Even though we have provided definitions for each term separately, they all interact with each other to place unique demands on children’s Linguistic Complexity and Language Usage. What makes the sociocultural context complex is that the contexts in which children interact and communicate are also redefined by their participation, along with that of other children and adults. Our goal in the standards is to exemplify some of the elements that have great impact on how language is used and that can be utilized by educators to reflect on the language demands and learning opportunities in their particular settings.
9
OV
ERV
IEW
Performance Definitions The Performance Definitions shape each of the three levels of English language development using the Features of Developmentally Appropriate Language as criteria. The three language levels, which outline the progression of early English language development are: Level 1— Entering, Level 3—Developing, and Level 5—Bridging. These language levels correspond to the five WIDA levels of language proficiency for English language learners, K–12, but pertain uniquely to the stages of English language development in DLLs, ages 2.5–5.5.
The Performance Definitions describe the language that DLLs can process and produce toward the end of each level of English language development when given language supports. These definitions do not represent all the possible skills that children will demonstrate at a particular level of language development. However, they do provide concrete guidelines as to the kinds of language practitioners might expect DLLs to understand or produce; the quantity and variety of oral language (Linguistic Complexity) and the types and use of oral language structures, phrases, and words (Language Usage) at three distinct levels of English language development. The language criteria of Linguistic Complexity and Language Usage are used to define both receptive and expressive language skills for every age cluster, as shown in Figures C-F.
10
OV
ERV
IEW
Figu
re C
: Ear
ly E
nglis
h La
ngua
ge D
evel
opm
ent P
erfo
rman
ce D
efini
tion
s –
Rece
ptiv
e, A
ges
2.5–
4.5
Tow
ard
the
end
of e
ach
age
clus
ter a
nd g
iven
leve
l of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent,
and
with
sens
ory
and
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts,
dua
l lan
guag
e le
arne
rs w
ill
proc
ess i
n En
glish
and
non
-ver
bally
dem
onstr
ate
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
:
…w
ithin
soci
ocul
tura
l con
text
s for
lang
uage
use
.
HOME LANGUAGE
Lang
uage
Cri
teri
aA
ges
2.5–
3.5
(30–
42 m
os.)
Age
s 3.
5–4.
5 (4
3–54
mos
.)
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• Se
ries o
f sim
ple
sent
ence
s rel
ated
to fa
mili
ar st
orie
s or
even
ts•
An id
ea w
ith o
ne to
two
deta
ils; o
ne-s
tep
dire
ctio
n re
late
d to
dai
ly ro
utin
es
• Sh
ort a
nd c
ompo
und
sent
ence
s rel
ated
to d
aily
ro
utin
es, f
amili
ar p
eopl
e, so
ngs,
and
storie
s •
Gen
eral
and
som
e sp
ecifi
c vo
cabu
lary
ass
ocia
ted
with
fa
mili
ar en
viro
nmen
ts an
d sto
ries
• Se
ries o
f ext
ende
d se
nten
ces r
elat
ed to
fam
iliar
stor
ies,
lear
ning
act
iviti
es, o
r eve
nts
• Re
late
d id
eas;
two-
step
dire
ctio
ns re
late
d to
dai
ly ro
utin
es
• C
ompo
und
and
som
e co
mpl
ex se
nten
ces r
elat
ed to
fa
mili
ar st
orie
s and
lear
ning
act
iviti
es•
Spec
ific
voca
bula
ry a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith st
orie
s, le
arni
ng
activ
ities
, and
var
ious
envi
ronm
ents
Leve
l 3D
evel
opin
g
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• Re
lated
phr
ases
and
sim
ple
sent
ence
s •
An id
ea w
ith o
ne d
etai
l
• Sh
ort s
ente
nces
rela
ted
to d
aily
rout
ines
, fam
iliar
pe
ople
, son
gs, a
nd st
orie
s•
Repe
titiv
e ph
rasa
l pat
tern
s rel
ated
to d
aily
rout
ines
an
d fa
mili
ar st
orie
s•
Gen
eral
voc
abul
ary
rela
ted
to d
aily
rout
ines
and
fa
mili
ar st
ories
• M
ultip
le re
late
d sim
ple
sent
ence
s; w
h-qu
estio
ns•
An id
ea w
ith tw
o de
tails
• Sh
ort a
nd so
me
com
poun
d se
nten
ces r
elat
ed to
fam
iliar
sto
ries a
nd le
arni
ng a
ctiv
ities
• Se
nten
ce p
atte
rns r
elat
ed to
fam
iliar
stor
ies a
nd le
arni
ng
activ
ities
•
Gen
eral
and
som
e sp
ecifi
c vo
cabu
lary
rela
ted
to d
aily
ro
utin
es, f
amili
ar st
ories
, and
lear
ning
activ
ities
Leve
l 1En
teri
ng
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• W
ords
and
repe
titiv
e ph
rase
s rel
ated
to d
aily
rout
ines
• An
idea
with
in si
mpl
e qu
estio
ns o
r sta
tem
ents
rela
ted
to se
lf, fa
mili
ar p
eopl
e, o
r dai
ly ro
utin
es
• Re
petit
ive
phra
ses a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith d
aily
rout
ines
• Ye
s/no
que
stion
s rel
ated
to se
lf, fa
mili
ar p
eopl
e, a
nd/
or d
aily
rout
ines
• W
ords
ass
ociat
ed w
ith fa
mili
ar en
viro
nmen
ts
• W
ords
and
phra
ses r
elat
ed to
dai
ly ro
utin
es•
An id
ea w
ithin
sim
ple
ques
tions
or s
tate
men
ts re
late
d to
fa
mili
ar e
nviro
nmen
ts
• Re
petit
ive
phra
ses a
nd si
mpl
e sta
tem
ents
asso
ciat
ed w
ith
daily
rout
ines
• Ye
s/no
que
stion
s rel
ated
to se
lf, fa
mili
ar p
eopl
e, a
nd/o
r da
ily ro
utin
es•
Wor
ds a
nd e
xpre
ssio
ns a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith fa
mili
ar
envi
ronm
ents
At th
e ve
ry b
egin
ning
stag
es o
f Eng
lish
lang
uage
dev
elop
men
t, du
al la
ngua
ge le
arne
rs ty
pica
lly u
nder
stand
mor
e w
ords
than
they
are
abl
e to
pro
duce
. Chi
ldre
n m
ay b
e no
n-ve
rbal
in E
nglis
h an
d re
ly p
rimar
ily o
n th
eir h
ome
lang
uage
and
/or g
estu
res t
o co
mm
unic
ate
thei
r nee
ds, w
ants,
and
idea
s.
At a
ll le
vels
of
lang
uage
de
velo
pem
ent,
hom
e la
ngua
ge
and
Engl
ish
lang
uage
de
velo
pmen
t
• in
fluen
ce a
nd
rein
forc
e ea
ch
othe
r; an
d
• m
edia
te
unde
rsta
ndin
g,
cons
truc
tion
of
mea
ning
, and
de
mon
strat
ion
of
know
ledg
e.
11
OV
ERV
IEW
Figu
re D
: Ear
ly E
nglis
h La
ngua
ge D
evel
opm
ent P
erfo
rman
ce D
efini
tion
s –
Rece
ptiv
e, A
ges
4.5–
5.5
Tow
ard
the
end
of e
ach
age
clus
ter a
nd g
iven
leve
l of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent,
and
with
sens
ory
and
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts,
dua
l lan
guag
e le
arne
rs w
ill
proc
ess i
n En
glish
and
non
-ver
bally
dem
onstr
ate
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
:
HOME LANGUAGE
Lang
uage
Cri
teri
aA
ges
4.5–
5.5
(55–
66 M
onth
s)
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• Se
nten
ces/
ques
tions
of v
aryi
ng ri
chne
ss a
nd c
ompl
exity
rela
ted
to fa
mili
ar st
orie
s, le
arni
ng a
ctiv
ities
, or
eve
nts
• Ex
pand
ed re
late
d id
eas;
two
to th
ree
step
dire
ctio
ns a
nd so
me
new
dire
ctio
ns re
late
d to
dai
ly ro
utin
es
• C
ompl
ex se
nten
ces a
nd la
ngua
ge p
atte
rns r
elat
ed to
fam
iliar
stor
ies a
nd in
struc
tiona
l act
iviti
es•
Spec
ific
and
som
e te
chni
cal v
ocab
ular
y as
soci
ated
with
var
ious
env
ironm
ents
and
lear
ning
act
iviti
es
Leve
l 3D
evel
opin
g
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• M
ultip
le re
late
d ex
tend
ed se
nten
ces
• Re
late
d id
eas
• C
ompo
und
and
som
e co
mpl
ex se
nten
ces r
elat
ed to
fam
iliar
stor
ies a
nd le
arni
ng a
ctiv
ities
• Se
nten
ce p
atte
rns r
elat
ed to
spec
ific
lear
ning
act
iviti
es a
nd st
orie
s•
Gen
eral
and
som
e sp
ecifi
c vo
cabu
lary
ass
ocia
ted
with
fam
iliar
env
ironm
ents
and
lear
ning
act
iviti
es
Leve
l 1En
teri
ng
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• W
ords
and
long
er p
hras
es re
late
d to
dai
ly ro
utin
es a
nd le
arni
ng a
ctiv
ities
• An
idea
with
in si
mpl
e qu
estio
ns o
r sta
tem
ents
rela
ted
to fa
mili
ar e
nviro
nmen
ts
• Re
petit
ive
phra
ses a
nd si
mpl
e sta
tem
ents
asso
ciat
ed w
ith d
aily
rout
ines
• Ye
s/no
que
stion
s rel
ated
to se
lf, fa
mili
ar p
eopl
e, a
nd/o
r dai
ly ro
utin
es•
Voca
bula
ry a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith fa
mili
ar e
nviro
nmen
ts an
d le
arni
ng a
ctiv
ities
At th
e ve
ry b
egin
ning
stag
es o
f Eng
lish
lang
uage
dev
elop
men
t, du
al la
ngua
ge le
arne
rs ty
pica
lly u
nder
stand
mor
e w
ords
than
they
are
abl
e to
pro
duce
. C
hild
ren
may
be
non-
verb
al in
Eng
lish
and
rely
prim
arily
on
thei
r hom
e la
ngua
ge a
nd/o
r ges
ture
s to
com
mun
icat
e th
eir n
eeds
, wan
ts, a
nd id
eas.
At a
ll le
vels
of
lang
uage
de
velo
pmen
t, ho
me
lang
uage
an
d En
glis
h la
ngua
ge
deve
lopm
ent
• in
fluen
ce a
nd
rein
forc
e ea
ch
othe
r; an
d
• m
edia
te
unde
rsta
ndin
g,
cons
truc
tion
of
mea
ning
, and
de
mon
strat
ion
of
know
ledg
e.
…w
ithin
soci
ocul
tura
l con
text
s for
lang
uage
use
.
12
OV
ERV
IEW
Figu
re E
: Ear
ly E
nglis
h La
ngua
ge D
evel
opm
ent P
erfo
rman
ce D
efini
tion
s –
Expr
essi
ve, A
ges
2.5–
4.5
At a
ll le
vels
of
lang
uage
de
velo
pmen
t, ho
me
lang
uage
an
d En
glis
h la
ngua
ge
deve
lopm
ent
• in
fluen
ce a
nd
rein
forc
e ea
ch
othe
r; an
d
• m
edia
te
unde
rsta
ndin
g,
cons
truc
tion
of
mea
ning
, and
de
mon
strat
ion
of
know
ledg
e.
Tow
ard
the
end
of e
ach
age
clus
ter a
nd g
iven
leve
l of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent,
and
with
sens
ory
and
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts,
dua
l lan
guag
e le
arne
rs w
ill e
xpre
ss in
Eng
lish:
…w
ithin
soci
ocul
tura
l con
text
s for
lang
uage
use
.
HOME LANGUAGE
Lang
uage
Cri
teri
aA
ges
2.5–
3.5
(30–
42 m
os.)
Age
s 3.
5–4.
5 (4
3–54
mos
.)
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• M
ultip
le p
hras
es a
nd so
me
fam
iliar
3+
wor
d se
nten
ces
• Si
ngle
idea
s
• Em
ergi
ng c
ompr
ehen
sibili
ty o
f fam
iliar
phr
ases
and
sh
ort s
ente
nces
• G
ener
al a
nd a
few
spec
ific
voca
bula
ry a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith
fam
iliar
env
ironm
ents
• Va
riety
of o
rigin
al se
nten
ces o
f 3–5
+ w
ords
• Ap
prox
imat
ions
of r
elat
ed id
eas
• C
ompr
ehen
sible
sent
ence
s tha
t may
con
tain
nou
ns, v
erbs
, m
odifi
ers,
and
pron
ouns
• Sp
ecifi
c an
d a
few
tech
nica
l voc
abul
ary
asso
ciat
ed w
ith
vario
us e
nviro
nmen
ts
Leve
l 3D
evel
opin
g
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• Ph
rase
s with
a fe
w fa
mili
ar th
ree-
wor
d se
nten
ces
• Ap
prox
imat
ions
of s
ingl
e id
eas
• Fa
mili
ar p
hras
es w
ith e
mer
ging
com
preh
ensib
ility
• Sh
ort r
epet
itive
lang
uage
pat
tern
s use
d in
fam
iliar
fin
gerp
lays
, son
gs, a
nd st
orie
s •
Gen
eral
voc
abul
ary
asso
ciat
ed w
ith fa
mili
ar
envi
ronm
ents
• Sh
ort s
ente
nces
of t
hree
to fo
ur w
ords
that
com
bine
fo
rmul
aic
phra
ses w
ith so
me
new
wor
ds a
nd p
hras
es•
Appr
oxim
atio
ns o
f ide
as
• Sh
ort s
ente
nces
with
em
ergi
ng c
ompr
ehen
sibili
ty
• Re
petit
ive
lang
uage
pat
tern
s use
d in
fing
erpl
ays,
song
s, sto
ries,
or le
arni
ng a
ctiv
ities
• G
ener
al a
nd a
few
spec
ific
voca
bula
ry a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith
fam
iliar
env
ironm
ents;
com
mon
exp
ress
ions
Leve
l 1En
teri
ng
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• W
ords
and
shor
t for
mul
aic
phra
ses
• O
ne-w
ord
utte
ranc
es to
con
vey
entir
e m
essa
ge o
r ide
a •
Sing
le w
ords
ass
ocia
ted
with
dai
ly ro
utin
es a
nd
fam
iliar
stor
ies
• Re
petit
ive
phra
ses
• W
ords
and
form
ulai
c ph
rase
s•
One
- to
two-
wor
d ut
tera
nces
to c
onve
y en
tire
mes
sage
or
idea
• Fa
mili
ar w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
ass
ocia
ted
with
dai
ly
rout
ines
•
Repe
titiv
e an
d fo
rmul
aic
phra
ses
• G
ener
al v
ocab
ular
y re
late
d to
fam
iliar
env
ironm
ents
At th
e ve
ry b
egin
ning
stag
es o
f Eng
lish
lang
uage
dev
elop
men
t, du
al la
ngua
ge le
arne
rs ty
pica
lly u
nder
stand
mor
e w
ords
than
they
are
abl
e to
pro
duce
. Chi
ldre
n m
ay b
e no
n-ve
rbal
in E
nglis
h an
d re
ly p
rimar
ily o
n th
eir h
ome
lang
uage
and
/or g
estu
res t
o co
mm
unic
ate
thei
r nee
ds, w
ants,
and
idea
s.
13
OV
ERV
IEW
Figu
re F
: Ear
ly E
nglis
h La
ngua
ge D
evel
opm
ent P
erfo
rman
ce D
efini
tion
s –
Expr
essi
ve, A
ges
4.5–
5.5
Tow
ard
the
end
of e
ach
age
clus
ter a
nd g
iven
leve
l of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent,
and
with
sens
ory
and
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts,
dua
l lan
guag
e le
arne
rs w
ill e
xpre
ss in
Eng
lish:
…w
ithin
soci
ocul
tura
l con
text
s for
lang
uage
use
.
HOME LANGUAGE
Lang
uage
Cri
teri
aA
ges
4.5–
5.5
(55–
66 M
onth
s)
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• Va
riety
of s
hort
and
exp
ande
d se
nten
ces o
f 4–6
+ w
ords
• Re
late
d id
eas
• C
ompr
ehen
sible
sent
ence
s tha
t may
con
tain
spec
ific
gram
mat
ical
form
s (e
.g.,
pres
ent p
rogr
essiv
e +
verb
, pas
t ten
se, p
lura
ls, p
osse
ssiv
es, a
nd a
rtic
les)
• Sp
ecifi
c an
d so
me
tech
nica
l voc
abul
ary
asso
ciat
ed w
ith v
ario
us e
nviro
nmen
ts an
d le
arni
ng a
ctiv
ities
Leve
l 3D
evel
opin
g
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• Sh
ort s
ente
nces
of t
hree
to fo
ur w
ords
that
com
bine
form
ulai
c ph
rase
s with
new
wor
ds a
nd so
me
expa
nded
sent
ence
s•
Appr
oxim
atio
ns o
f rel
ated
idea
s
• Sh
ort a
nd so
me
expa
nded
sent
ence
s with
em
ergi
ng c
ompr
ehen
sibili
ty•
Mul
tiple
repe
titiv
e la
ngua
ge p
atte
rns u
sed
in st
orie
s, so
ngs,
and
lear
ning
act
iviti
es•
Gen
eral
and
som
e sp
ecifi
c vo
cabu
lary
ass
ocia
ted
with
fam
iliar
env
ironm
ents
and
lear
ning
act
iviti
es
Leve
l 1En
teri
ng
Ling
uist
ic
Com
plex
ity
Lang
uage
Usa
ge
• W
ords
and
long
er fo
rmul
aic
phra
ses
• O
ne- t
o tw
o-w
ord
utte
ranc
es to
con
vey
entir
e m
essa
ge o
r ide
a
• W
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
ass
ocia
ted
with
dai
ly ro
utin
es a
nd fa
mili
ar st
orie
s•
Repe
titiv
e an
d fo
rmul
aic
phra
ses
• G
ener
al v
ocab
ular
y re
late
d to
fam
iliar
env
ironm
ents
and
lear
ning
act
iviti
es
At th
e ve
ry b
egin
ning
stag
es o
f Eng
lish
lang
uage
dev
elop
men
t, du
al la
ngua
ge le
arne
rs ty
pica
lly u
nder
stand
mor
e w
ords
than
they
are
abl
e to
pro
duce
. C
hild
ren
may
be
non-
verb
al in
Eng
lish
and
rely
prim
arily
on
thei
r hom
e la
ngua
ge a
nd/o
r ges
ture
s to
com
mun
icat
e th
eir n
eeds
, wan
ts, a
nd id
eas.
At a
ll le
vels
of
lang
uage
de
velo
pmen
t, ho
me
lang
uage
an
d En
glis
h la
ngua
ge
deve
lopm
ent
• in
fluen
ce a
nd
rein
forc
e ea
ch
othe
r; an
d
• m
edia
te
unde
rsta
ndin
g,
cons
truc
tion
of
mea
ning
, and
de
mon
strat
ion
of
know
ledg
e.
14
OV
ERV
IEW
DLLs cannot be represented through a single language development level (e.g., Level 3) or even levels for each language domain (e.g., Level 3–Receptive, Level 1–Expressive). Instead, language is fluid and often varies based on the context for language use. Therefore, the Performance Definitions are a tool to observe language performance over time and in various spaces, and we encourage teachers to use information they collect as one of various measures for examining language development.
The Performance Definitions also recognize the key role that home language plays at all levels of English language development. DLLs will continue to use home language as they develop their new language. The dynamic interaction between languages supports meaning making and the development of metalinguistic awareness. When the development of two languages is strongly encouraged and effectively supported, DLLs use all of their cognitive and linguistic assets to become successful language learners.
In short, engaging in translanguaging enables DLLs to use their entire linguistic repertoire to navigate between languages to relate messages, construct meaning across languages, and gain a deeper understanding of content.
E-ELD StandardsAs WIDA developed the E-ELD Standards, it took into consideration the major dimensions of development and learning recommended by the National Education Goals Panel (NEGP) (BUILD, 2012; Scott-Little, Kagan, & Stebbins Frelow, 2005) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC, 2009) for inclusion into ELS. These dimensions of children’s development are also represented in the Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework (Office of Head Start, 2010) and have been adopted by states to varying degrees within their ELS. Figure G depicts the correspondence between NEGP’s recommended major dimensions of development and learning for ELS and the WIDA E-ELD Standards.
15
OV
ERV
IEW
Figure G: The Correspondence Between the Five Dimensions of Children’s Development and the E-ELD Standards
The Venn diagrams shown in Figure G are an example of the overlapping nature of these dimensions of development and learning and corresponding language standards. This correspondence, also exemplified in other state ELS, makes it possible to integrate the E-ELD Standards within standards-based curriculum, instruction, and assessment for DLLs throughout their program day in a variety of ECE settings including child care, Head Start, preschool, and 4-year-old Kindergarten.
Using the six WIDA E-ELD Standards to inform their practice, practitioners will not find a prescriptive list of what DLLs need to know and be able to do in a particular instructional setting. Rather, language standards are generative in the sense that they help practitioners develop their own representations of how DLLs will use language in particular ECE communities. This involves connecting information about DLLs’ language development with awareness of the language demands of a learning activity, and integrating language supports to maximize DLLs’ learning and participation.
While language standards provide guidance and reference points in organizing instruction to support both learning and language development, they are only one of many factors to consider in supporting DLLs’ success in ECE settings.
Visual Representation of the National Education Goals Panel (NEGP)’s Five Dimensions of Children’s
Development that are Linked to School Readiness and Children’s Later Success
Visual Representation of the Early English Language
Development Standards
APPROACHES TO LEARNINGTHE LANGUAGE OF
Early LanguageDevelopment
& Literacy
PhysicalDevelopment
Math • ScienceSocial Studies
CognitiveDevelopment
Social andEmotional
Development
APPROACHES TO LEARNING
Language & Communication
Development
Physical Well-Being
& MotorDevelopment
Cognition & General
Knowledge
Social & Emotional
Development
16
OV
ERV
IEW
Figure H: The Early English Language Development Standards
Standard Abbreviation
Early English Language Development Standard 1
Dual language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for success in the area of Social and Emotional Development
The Language of Social and Emotional Development
Early English Language Development Standard 2
Dual language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of Early Language Development and Literacy
The Language of Early Language Development and Literacy
Early English Language Development Standard 3
Dual language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of Mathematics
The Language of Mathematics
Early English Language Development Standard 4
Dual language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of Science
The Language of Science
Early English Language Development Standard 5
Dual language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of Social Studies
The Language of Social Studies
Early English Language Development Standard 6
Dual language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of Physical Development
The Language of Physical Development
17
OV
ERV
IEW
Standards Matrices and Strands of Model Performance IndicatorsThe standards matrices provide examples of language use across the different levels, just like the Performance Definitions. However, in the matrices, the language is further contextualized within different language domains, E-ELD Standards and age ranges. They help practitioners envision what the E-ELD standards look like for different DLLs.
A Strand of MPIs consists of three language levels of early English language development for a given connection, topic, and language domain. A Strand of MPIs represents one of many possible pathways in language development within a particular context. This horizontal arrangement of a Strand of MPIs illustrates the progression of language development for a given age cluster. The Strands of MPIs provide a consistent structure for ECE practitioners to use when scaffolding or assessing DLLs’ language across a wide range of learning activities and environments. These strands are meant to be examples and not fixed guidelines of the language with which DLLs may engage during instruction and assessment. ECE practitioners can modify or transform existing Strands of MPIs to make them more relevant to their curriculum or instruction.
ECE professionals are well aware that significant developmental differences exist between 2.5-year-olds and 5.5-year-olds, both linguistically and cognitively. Typically developing 3-year-olds (monolingual or bilingual) cannot be expected to comprehend or produce language of the same complexity as that of 5-year-olds. Therefore, the examples of language provided in the strands are organized by age clusters, which take this cognitive and linguistic threshold into account. Specific language criteria is provided for each of the following age groups:
• 2.5–3.5 years (30–42 months)• 3.5–4.5 years (43–54 months)• 4.5–5.5 years (55–66 months)
18
OV
ERV
IEW
Standards Matrices
The standards matrices make an explicit connection to state ELS and the Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework so that they can be easily used within programs’ standards-based curricula, instruction, and assessment. This section uses the standards matrix from E-ELD Standard 6: The Language of Physical Development, for ages 4.5–5.5 to illustrate each component. In the example in Figure I, the matrix shows a connection to Georgia Early Learning and Development Standards. Each matrix shows a connection to a different set of ELS to show the flexibility of the WIDA E-ELD Standards and their ability to work in practitioners’ specific contexts.
The example matrix shown in Figure I shows language for DLLs who are 4.5-5.5 years old. Figure I also shows the connection to early learning standards and the example topics.
Figure I: Standard, Age Level, Example Topic, and Connection
The example topics are the elements of the standards matrix that list a theme or concept derived from state ELS and Head Start Framework and that provide a context for language development. In the example shown in Figure I, the topic is outdoor play, which is derived from the broader Georgia Early Learning and Development Standards. A list of sample topics that align with the content found in many state ELS is shown in Figure J. Please note that this topic list is meant to highlight some of the most frequently cited content topics and is by no means an exhaustive list.
63EARLY LANGUAGE
DEVELOPMENT AND LITERACY
CONNECTION: Georgia Early Learning and Development Standards (GELDS); Domain: Physical Development & Motor Skills; Standard PDM5: The child will demonstrate gross motor skills.
KINDERGARTEN CONNECTION: Georgia Performance Standards: Physical Education: Standard: PEK.1: Demonstrates competency in motor skills and movement patterns needed to perform a variety of activities.
EXAMPLE CONTEXT FOR LANGUAGE USE: Children talk, play and interact with their peers outdoors.
COGNITIVE FUNCTION: Children at all levels of English language development will APPLY their knowledge about movement.
DO
MA
IN: E
xpre
ssiv
e
Level 1Entering
Level 3Developing
Level 5Bridging
Repeat words and familiar phrases associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups.
Describe activities associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups in English and Home language. (e.g., “I go in tunnel.”)
Persuade peers to participate in activities associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups in English and Home language. (e.g., “I want the red bike. You get the patineta.”)
TOPIC-RELATED LANGUAGE: Children at all levels of language development interact with developmentally appropriate words and expressions such as: up, slide, Let’s go____
AGES: 4.5–5.5
E-ELD STANDARD 6: The Language of Physical Development EXAMPLE TOPIC: Outdoor play
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
See example of translanguaging in
this Strand.
See example of a connection to a
Kindergarten state standard in this Strand.
19
OV
ERV
IEW
Figure J: Topic List
Area of Development and Learning
Social and Emotional Development
Physical Development
Early Language and Literacy
Topics • Self-concept• Feelings/Emotions • Self-regulation • Self-help/Independence • Adult relationships/
interactions• Making choices• Daily routines• Following directions • Transitioning between
activities and places• Peer interactions • Making friends• Sharing• Group cooperation/
interactions • Understanding/
following rules
• Body awareness• Physical games • Outdoor play • Gym/playground
Equipment• Sports • Exercise and fitness• Music and movement• Health and hygiene• Personal safety • Nutrition• Self-care (e.g., dressing,
eating, toileting)• Using art materials• Creating art projects• Using writing tools
• Understanding/following oral directions
• Communicating ideas• Questioning and
commenting• Creative expression• Social uses of language• Role Playing• Story sense/Story
elements• Telling/retelling stories• Concepts of print• Literature awareness• Phonological and
phonemic awareness • Alphabet knowledge • Writing process
Mathematics Science Social Studies
• Making comparisons• Number sense • Numeral recognition• Computation• Geometric shapes • Patterns• Classification/Sorting• Graphic
representations• Measurement • Spatial awareness • Time awareness• Data collection/
analysis
• Our body• Our five senses• Seasons/Climate • Weather• Earth • The environment• Growth/Life cycles• Plants/Food• Living things and their
habitats• Rocks/Minerals/Fossils • Liquids/Solids/Air• Magnets/Electricity• Space/Solar system• Technology/
Computers• Scientific observation
and inquiry• Data collection/
analysis
• Similarities/differences between self and others
• Families• Classroom routines/
rules• Group belonging and
safety• Classroom jobs• Environmental print• Community• Community workers• Transportation • Housing/Homes• Geography/Maps • City/Country (Urban/
Rural)• Countries of the world• Customs/Traditions • Appreciation for
diverse cultures• Historical events
20
OV
ERV
IEW
The example context for language use refers to the particular situation, event, or context in which the communication occurs. Children use language in particular ways that vary according to the context. The example context provides an authentic example for practitioners to be able to imagine the situation in which language is being used. In the example in Figure K, DLLs talk, play, and interact with their peers outdoors. This information provides us information about factors in the context that may impact how DLLs use or process language. In this example, communicating with peers affords specific uses of language that are different from other settings. This contexts provides us with information about who will participate and the type of activity in which the participants will engage.
The Cognitive Function offers information on the cognitive demand of a particular activity. Figure K shows an example of the cognitive function.
Figure K: Example Context for Language Use and Cognitive Function
The cognitive function is a reminder to practitioners that DLLs need access to the same level of thinking as their peers regardless of their language development level. In the example shown in Figure K, all children will be asked to apply their knowledge about movement as they participate in the activity, regardless of individual linguistic abilities.
The E-ELD framework includes two language domains—receptive and expressive. These language domains, with their focus on oral language development, encompass the listening and speaking and overall meaning-making skills (e.g., gestures) DLLs will need and use across all six standards. Oral language is central to both the teaching and learning of many early literacy skills, including concepts of print, phonological and phonemic awareness, vocabulary development, alphabet knowledge and writing (Dickinson, 2011; Dickinson,Golindoff, & Hirsh-Pasek, 2010; Dickinson, McCabe, & Sprague, 2003; Dickinson & Porche, 2011). In addition, a strong foundation in oral language skills is critical for learning to read and write well in the early elementary years (Resnick & Snow, 2009). In the example in Figure L, the domain being addressed is the expressive domain.
63EARLY LANGUAGE
DEVELOPMENT AND LITERACY
CONNECTION: Georgia Early Learning and Development Standards (GELDS); Domain: Physical Development & Motor Skills; Standard PDM5: The child will demonstrate gross motor skills.
KINDERGARTEN CONNECTION: Georgia Performance Standards: Physical Education: Standard: PEK.1: Demonstrates competency in motor skills and movement patterns needed to perform a variety of activities.
EXAMPLE CONTEXT FOR LANGUAGE USE: Children talk, play and interact with their peers outdoors.
COGNITIVE FUNCTION: Children at all levels of English language development will APPLY their knowledge about movement.
DO
MA
IN: E
xpre
ssiv
e
Level 1Entering
Level 3Developing
Level 5Bridging
Repeat words and familiar phrases associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups.
Describe activities associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups in English and Home language. (e.g., “I go in tunnel.”)
Persuade peers to participate in activities associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups in English and Home language. (e.g., “I want the red bike. You get the patineta.”)
TOPIC-RELATED LANGUAGE: Children at all levels of language development interact with developmentally appropriate words and expressions such as: up, slide, Let’s go____
AGES: 4.5–5.5
E-ELD STANDARD 6: The Language of Physical Development EXAMPLE TOPIC: Outdoor play
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
See example of translanguaging in
this Strand.
See example of a connection to a
Kindergarten state standard in this Strand.
21
OV
ERV
IEW
Figure L: Expressive Domain and Levels
Strands of Model Performance Indicators
A Strand of MPIs consists of three language levels of early English language development for a given connection, topic, and language domain. In the example shown in Figure L, you see how DLLs at Entering level may need to repeat words and familiar phrases in this context, while DLLs at the Developing level may be able to describe the same activities independently. This is not to say that a DLL at the Entering level is not able to describe the activities, but that he or she may be able to do so in a language other than English, or through signs or gestures. Similarly, a DLL at the Bridging level has enough language to persuade peers. Here, the linguistic expectation for persuading is higher and more complex than for describing. While the child at the Developing level may be trying to persuade someone else, he or she will use language features related to describing to accomplish the same purpose for language use.
Practitioners can then use strands to (a) match DLLs’ performance to levels of language development, (b) create language targets and objectives that go beyond DLLs’ independent level of language development and (c) differentiate the language of the content to match the level of DLLs’ language development.
Each MPI is composed of three main elements: a language function, a content stem, and language support(s). Language functions describe how DLLs will produce or process language within specific context for learning.
Figure M: Level 3 Developing
63EARLY LANGUAGE
DEVELOPMENT AND LITERACY
CONNECTION: Georgia Early Learning and Development Standards (GELDS); Domain: Physical Development & Motor Skills; Standard PDM5: The child will demonstrate gross motor skills.
KINDERGARTEN CONNECTION: Georgia Performance Standards: Physical Education: Standard: PEK.1: Demonstrates competency in motor skills and movement patterns needed to perform a variety of activities.
EXAMPLE CONTEXT FOR LANGUAGE USE: Children talk, play and interact with their peers outdoors.
COGNITIVE FUNCTION: Children at all levels of English language development will APPLY their knowledge about movement.
DO
MA
IN: E
xpre
ssiv
e
Level 1Entering
Level 3Developing
Level 5Bridging
Repeat words and familiar phrases associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups.
Describe activities associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups in English and Home language. (e.g., “I go in tunnel.”)
Persuade peers to participate in activities associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups in English and Home language. (e.g., “I want the red bike. You get the patineta.”)
TOPIC-RELATED LANGUAGE: Children at all levels of language development interact with developmentally appropriate words and expressions such as: up, slide, Let’s go____
AGES: 4.5–5.5
E-ELD STANDARD 6: The Language of Physical Development EXAMPLE TOPIC: Outdoor play
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
See example of translanguaging in
this Strand.
See example of a connection to a
Kindergarten state standard in this Strand.
63EARLY LANGUAGE
DEVELOPMENT AND LITERACY
CONNECTION: Georgia Early Learning and Development Standards (GELDS); Domain: Physical Development & Motor Skills; Standard PDM5: The child will demonstrate gross motor skills.
KINDERGARTEN CONNECTION: Georgia Performance Standards: Physical Education: Standard: PEK.1: Demonstrates competency in motor skills and movement patterns needed to perform a variety of activities.
EXAMPLE CONTEXT FOR LANGUAGE USE: Children talk, play and interact with their peers outdoors.
COGNITIVE FUNCTION: Children at all levels of English language development will APPLY their knowledge about movement.
DO
MA
IN: E
xpre
ssiv
e
Level 1Entering
Level 3Developing
Level 5Bridging
Repeat words and familiar phrases associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups.
Describe activities associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups in English and Home language. (e.g., “I go in tunnel.”)
Persuade peers to participate in activities associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups in English and Home language. (e.g., “I want the red bike. You get the patineta.”)
TOPIC-RELATED LANGUAGE: Children at all levels of language development interact with developmentally appropriate words and expressions such as: up, slide, Let’s go____
AGES: 4.5–5.5
E-ELD STANDARD 6: The Language of Physical Development EXAMPLE TOPIC: Outdoor play
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
See example of translanguaging in
this Strand.
See example of a connection to a
Kindergarten state standard in this Strand.
22
OV
ERV
IEW
In the example in Figure M, the MPI for Level 3, Developing, uses describe as its language function. Describe typically relates to adjectives and adverbs, and describing can be achieved through a phrase or short sentence. Language functions are related but distinct from the cognitive complexity of a task. DLLs at all language levels can engage in higher level thinking according to their developmental capacity. Instead, the language function refers to the linguistic features associated with it. The number and complexity of language functions used by DLLs increases as language develops.
The second element of the MPI is the content stem. The content stem is derived from the Example Topic, which in turn, is derived from state ELS and Head Start’s Child Development and Early Learning Framework. The content stem denotes WIDA’s view that early English language development should always be integrated with play-based content instruction and assessment through meaningful and authentic contexts. In the example in Figure M, the content stem is outdoor play, which in this case is the same as the topic for the strand. In other standards matrices, the content stem may be narrower than the example topic.
The third element of the MPI is the language support(s). It is always listed at the end of the MPI and illustrates the importance of scaffolding language development for DLLs. Each MPI may contain more than one support and the supports may or may not change with increased language complexity. In the example provided in Figure M, the supports include peer models, small groups and the use of home language. WIDA names three categories of language supports for DLLs: sensory, graphic and interactive.
Figure N shows some examples of language supports under these three categories that are commonly found in ECE settings.
Figure N: Language Supports for DLLs, Ages 2.5-5.5
Sensory Supports Graphic Supports Interactive Supports
Real life objects
Toys
Manipulatives
Pictures and photographs
Illustrations and drawings
Magazines
Videos and films
Demonstrations
Gestures
Models
Music
Costumes and props
Charts
Diagrams
Graphic organizers
Graphs
Number lines
Visual schedule
Icons/symbols
In pairs with partners
In small groups
In a large group
Using cooperative group structures
With the Internet (websites) or software programs
In the home language
With adult prompting/modeling
23
OV
ERV
IEW
The Topic Related Language provides examples of content-related words and expressions to which all children at that age level should be exposed, regardless of their language development level. Although DLLs may be at different points in their language development trajectory, when learning particular content, certain specific and technical developmentally appropriate language is essential for engaging in learning the ideas and concepts presented. Through the use of scaffolds and supports, DLLs should have the opportunity to interact with that language. Figure O shows the topic related language.
Figure O: Topic Related Language
Customizing Strands for Your Local ContextThe WIDA Strands of MPIs are examples that illustrate differentiated language expectations related to content-area instruction within one language domain. WIDA invites practitioners to create, innovate, transform, and customize the strands to best meet the needs of their DLLs and language education programs. Figure P shows the guiding questions practitioners should ask themselves when planning instruction for emerging bilinguals or when drafting customized Strands of MPIs. Figure Q contains a blank template that can be copied and reused for this purpose.
63EARLY LANGUAGE
DEVELOPMENT AND LITERACY
CONNECTION: Georgia Early Learning and Development Standards (GELDS); Domain: Physical Development & Motor Skills; Standard PDM5: The child will demonstrate gross motor skills.
KINDERGARTEN CONNECTION: Georgia Performance Standards: Physical Education: Standard: PEK.1: Demonstrates competency in motor skills and movement patterns needed to perform a variety of activities.
EXAMPLE CONTEXT FOR LANGUAGE USE: Children talk, play and interact with their peers outdoors.
COGNITIVE FUNCTION: Children at all levels of English language development will APPLY their knowledge about movement.
DO
MA
IN: E
xpre
ssiv
e
Level 1Entering
Level 3Developing
Level 5Bridging
Repeat words and familiar phrases associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups.
Describe activities associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups in English and Home language. (e.g., “I go in tunnel.”)
Persuade peers to participate in activities associated with outdoor play following peer models in small groups in English and Home language. (e.g., “I want the red bike. You get the patineta.”)
TOPIC-RELATED LANGUAGE: Children at all levels of language development interact with developmentally appropriate words and expressions such as: up, slide, Let’s go____
AGES: 4.5–5.5
E-ELD STANDARD 6: The Language of Physical Development EXAMPLE TOPIC: Outdoor play
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
See example of translanguaging in
this Strand.
See example of a connection to a
Kindergarten state standard in this Strand.
24
OV
ERV
IEW
AG
ES:
CON
NEC
TIO
N: W
hich
stat
e ea
rly le
arni
ng c
onte
nt st
anda
rds f
orm
the
basis
of t
he re
late
d ac
tivity
? Wha
t are
the
esse
ntia
l con
cept
s and
skill
s em
bedd
ed in
the
cont
ent s
tand
ards
? W
hat i
s the
lang
uage
ass
ocia
ted
with
thes
e de
velo
pmen
tally
app
ropr
iate
con
cept
s and
skill
s?
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT F
OR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: W
hat i
s the
pur
pose
of t
he a
ctiv
ity? W
hat r
oles
or i
dent
ities
do
the
child
ren
assu
me
and
how
do
they
inte
ract
? Wha
t reg
ister
is
requ
ired
of th
e ta
sk?
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTIO
N: W
hat i
s the
leve
l of c
ogni
tive e
ngag
emen
t for
the g
iven
task
? Doe
s the
leve
l of c
ogni
tive e
ngag
emen
t mat
ch o
r exc
eed
that
of t
he st
ates
’ Ear
ly
Lear
ning
Sta
ndar
ds?
Language Domain(s): How will dual language learners process and
use language?
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
A S
tran
d of
Mod
el P
erfo
rman
ce In
dica
tors
:
Wha
t lan
guag
e ar
e D
LLs e
xpec
ted
to p
roce
ss o
r pro
duce
at e
ach
leve
l of d
evel
opm
ent?
Whi
ch la
ngua
ge fu
nctio
ns re
flect
the
cogn
itive
func
tion
at e
ach
leve
l of l
angu
age
deve
lopm
ent?
Whi
ch la
ngua
ge su
ppor
ts (s
enso
ry, g
raph
ic, a
nd in
tera
ctiv
e) a
re n
eces
sary
for D
LLs t
o ac
cess
lang
uage
and
con
tent
?
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: W
ith w
hich
dev
elop
men
tally
app
ropr
iate
wor
ds a
nd e
xpre
ssio
ns w
ill a
ll ch
ildre
n in
tera
ct?
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD:
Figu
re P
: Gui
ding
Que
stio
ns fo
r the
Com
pone
nts
of th
e W
IDA
E-E
LD S
tran
ds
EXA
MPL
E TO
PIC:
W
hat i
s one
of t
he to
pics
addr
esse
d in
the s
elec
ted
cont
ent s
tand
ard(
s)?
25
OV
ERV
IEW
AG
ES:
CON
NEC
TIO
N:
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT F
OR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTIO
N:
Language Domain(s):
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E:
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD:
EXA
MPL
E TO
PIC:
Reg
istx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxr
o
Figu
re Q
: Tem
plat
e fo
r Str
ands
of M
PIs
AG
ES: X
XX y
ears
27SO
CIA
L A
ND
EM
OTI
ON
AL
MAT
HEM
ATIC
SSC
IEN
CESO
CIA
L
STU
DIE
SPH
YSIC
AL
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T
EARL
Y LA
NG
UA
GE
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T A
ND
LIT
ERA
CY
Stra
nds
of M
odel
Per
form
ance
In
dica
tors
Rep
rese
ntin
g th
e W
IDA
Ear
ly E
nglis
h La
ngua
ge
Dev
elop
men
t Sta
ndar
ds
The
follo
win
g St
rand
s of
Mod
el P
erfo
rman
ce
Indi
cato
rs p
rovi
de e
xam
ples
of h
ow D
LLs
proc
ess
and
prod
uce
lang
uage
acr
oss
the
leve
ls o
f lan
guag
e de
velo
pmen
t.
Addi
tiona
lly, t
hey
incl
ude
exam
ples
of
tran
slan
guag
ing,
and
pro
vide
exa
mpl
es o
f co
nnec
tions
to s
tate
ear
ly le
arni
ng s
tand
ards
, st
ate
Kind
erga
rten
sta
ndar
ds a
nd C
omm
on
Core
Kin
derg
arte
n St
anda
rds.
SOCI
AL
AN
D
EMO
TIO
NA
L28
CON
NEC
TIO
N: N
ew Y
ork
Stat
e Ear
ly Le
arni
ng G
uide
lines:
Dom
ain
II S
ocia
l and
Em
otio
nal D
evelo
pmen
t; P:
Em
otio
nal E
xpre
ssion
; Ind
icato
r 2: N
ames
som
e em
otio
ns (e
.g.,
happ
y, ex
cite
d, sa
d, m
ad, t
ired,
scar
ed).
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n cr
eate
and
liste
n to
cla
ssro
om b
ooks
in a
larg
e gr
oup
setti
ng.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
feel
ings
.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Poin
t to
char
acte
rs d
ispla
ying
em
otio
ns b
ased
on
oral
com
man
ds u
sing
book
illu
strat
ions
or p
hoto
s w
ith a
n ad
ult.
Iden
tify
char
acte
rs d
ispla
ying
em
otio
ns b
ased
on
exte
nded
ora
l com
man
ds u
sing
book
illu
strat
ions
or
phot
os w
ith a
n ad
ult.
Dist
ingu
ish b
etw
een
char
acte
rs d
ispla
ying
em
otio
ns
base
d on
ora
l sta
tem
ents
and/
or q
uesti
ons u
sing
book
illu
strat
ions
or p
hoto
s with
an
adul
t.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
Show
m
e___
____
__, W
here
is th
e __
____
____
?, sa
d, h
appy
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 1
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial a
nd E
mot
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: F
eelin
gs
29SO
CIA
L A
ND
EM
OTI
ON
AL
EARL
Y LA
NG
UA
GE
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T A
ND
LIT
ERA
CY
CON
NEC
TIO
N: P
enns
ylvan
ia L
earn
ing
Stan
dard
s for
Ear
ly C
hild
hood
- Pre
-Kin
derg
arte
n. K
ey L
earn
ing
Area
: Soc
ial a
nd E
mot
iona
l Dev
elopm
ent:
Stud
ent I
nter
perso
nal S
kills
; St
anda
rd A
rea
16.1
: Self
-aw
aren
ess sk
ills a
nd se
lf-re
gula
tion;
Sta
ndar
d 16
.1.P
K.A:
Dist
ingu
ish b
etw
een
emot
ions
and
iden
tify
soci
ally
acc
epte
d w
ays t
o ex
pres
s the
m.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n sin
g an
d m
ove
to fa
mili
ar so
ngs a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith fe
elin
gs in
a la
rge
grou
p se
tting
.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
feel
ings
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Iden
tify
simpl
e fa
cial
exp
ress
ions
and
act
ions
fro
m o
ral s
tate
men
ts fo
llow
ing
mod
els a
nd u
sing
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts
with
an
adul
t.
Iden
tify
simpl
e fa
cial
exp
ress
ions
and
act
ions
fro
m o
ral d
escr
iptio
ns fo
llow
ing
mod
els a
nd u
sing
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts
with
a p
artn
er.
Iden
tify
simpl
e fa
cial
exp
ress
ions
and
act
ions
from
or
al c
ompa
rison
s fol
low
ing
mod
els a
nd u
sing
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts
with
a p
artn
er.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
Show
m
e___
____
____
, Sho
w h
appy
like
___
____
____
___
, hap
py, s
ad
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 1
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial a
nd E
mot
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: F
eelin
gs
SOCI
AL
AN
D
EMO
TIO
NA
L30
CON
NEC
TIO
N: N
ew Y
ork
Stat
e Pre
kind
erga
rten
Fou
ndat
ion
for t
he C
omm
on C
ore;
Dom
ain
3: S
ocia
l Em
otio
nal D
evelo
pmen
t; Se
lf-re
gula
tion;
Sta
ndar
d PK
.SED
.2: R
egul
ates
his/
her
resp
onse
s to
need
s, fe
elin
gs a
nd e
vent
s.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Ark
ansa
s Phy
sical
Edu
catio
n an
d H
ealth
Fra
mew
ork
Revi
sed 2
011;
Stra
nd: P
hysic
al E
duca
tion
and
Leisu
re S
tand
ard
5: P
erso
nal a
nd S
ocia
l Be
havi
or: S
tude
nts s
hall
dem
onstr
ate
resp
onsib
le p
erso
nal a
nd so
cial
beh
avio
r tha
t res
pect
s sel
f and
oth
ers i
n ph
ysic
al a
ctiv
ity se
tting
s; So
cial B
ehav
ior P
EL.5
.K.3
: Par
ticip
ate
in
coop
erat
ive
play
.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n ro
le p
lay
and
expr
ess f
eelin
gs w
ith th
eir p
eers
in sm
all g
roup
setti
ngs.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
feel
ings
.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Act o
ut a
ctio
ns fr
om si
mpl
e or
al st
atem
ents
usin
g vi
sual
and
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts
(e.g
., ge
sture
s and
H
ome
lang
uage
) and
pee
r mod
els.
Act o
ut a
ctio
ns fr
om sh
ort o
ral d
escr
iptio
ns u
sing
visu
al a
nd in
tera
ctiv
e su
ppor
ts (e
.g.,
gestu
res a
nd
Hom
e la
ngua
ge) a
nd p
eer m
odel
s.
Act o
ut a
ctio
ns fr
om a
serie
s or o
ral d
escr
iptio
ns
usin
g vi
sual
and
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts
(e.g
., ge
sture
s an
d H
ome
lang
uage
) and
pee
r mod
els (
e.g.
, “Я
pre
tend
аю. I
like
мол
очны
й су
п.”)
.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
mad
, pre
tend
, ex
cite
d, I
feel
____
____
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 1
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial a
nd E
mot
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: F
eelin
gs
See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
See
exam
ple
of
a co
nnec
tion
to a
Ki
nder
gart
en s
tate
sta
ndar
d
in th
is S
tran
d.
31SO
CIA
L A
ND
EM
OTI
ON
AL
EARL
Y LA
NG
UA
GE
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T A
ND
LIT
ERA
CY
CON
NEC
TIO
N:
Mai
ne’s
Early
Chi
ldho
od L
earn
ing
Gui
delin
es; D
omai
n: P
erso
nal a
nd S
ocia
l Dev
elopm
ent;
Dom
ain
Elem
ent C
- Soc
ial C
ompe
tenc
e; In
dica
tor:
Incr
ease
abi
litie
s to
part
icip
ate
succ
essfu
lly a
s a m
embe
r of a
gro
up th
roug
h su
stain
ing
inte
ract
ions
with
pee
rs (e
.g.,
help
ing,
shar
ing
and
disc
ussin
g).
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n ta
lk a
nd in
tera
ct a
s the
y cl
ean
up in
a la
rge
grou
p se
tting
.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t coo
pera
tion.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at a
ctiv
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
cle
anup
with
visu
al
supp
orts
follo
win
g ad
ult m
odel
. N
ame
activ
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
cle
anup
with
visu
al
supp
orts
follo
win
g ad
ult m
odel
.D
escr
ibe
activ
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
cle
anup
with
vi
sual
supp
orts
follo
win
g ad
ult m
odel
.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
clea
nup,
hel
p pl
ease
, my
turn
, I _
____
___,
you
____
____
_
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 1
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial a
nd E
mot
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t E
XAM
PLE
TOPI
C: G
roup
coo
pera
tion
SOCI
AL
AN
D
EMO
TIO
NA
L32
CON
NEC
TIO
N: W
iscon
sin M
odel
Early
Lea
rnin
g St
anda
rds (
WM
ELS)
; Dom
ain:
Soc
ial a
nd E
mot
iona
l Dev
elopm
ent;
Sub-
Dom
ain
C. S
ocia
l Com
pete
nce;
Perfo
rman
ce S
tand
ard:
C
.EL.
3:
Dem
onstr
ates
und
ersta
ndin
g of
rule
s and
soci
al e
xpec
tatio
ns.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n ta
lk, p
lay
gam
es a
nd in
tera
ct w
ith th
eir p
eers
in sm
all g
roup
setti
ngs.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t coo
pera
tion.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at w
ords
and
phr
ases
ass
ocia
ted
with
shar
ing
and
taki
ng tu
rns f
ollo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
Engl
ish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge.
Nam
e ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith sh
arin
g an
d ta
king
tu
rns f
ollo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
Engl
ish a
nd H
ome
lang
uage
. (e.
g., “
Tom
amos
turn
os- y
ou g
o.”)
Des
crib
e ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith sh
arin
g an
d ta
king
turn
s fol
low
ing
peer
mod
els i
n En
glish
and
H
ome
lang
uage
. (“I
go
first,
desp
ués e
s tu
turn
o.”)
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
my
turn
, you
go,
le
t’s sh
are
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 1
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial a
nd E
mot
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t E
XAM
PLE
TOPI
C: G
roup
coo
pera
tion
See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
33SO
CIA
L A
ND
EM
OTI
ON
AL
EARL
Y LA
NG
UA
GE
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T A
ND
LIT
ERA
CY
CON
NEC
TIO
N: H
awai
i Ear
ly Le
arni
ng a
nd D
evelo
pmen
t Sta
ndar
ds (H
ELD
S): D
omai
n 2:
Soc
ial a
nd E
mot
iona
l; St
rand
: Soc
ial D
evelo
pmen
t; To
pic:
Inte
racti
ons w
ith P
eers;
St
anda
rd S
E.KE
.: U
se tu
rn-ta
king
in c
onve
rsat
ions
and
in p
lay.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Haw
aii K
inde
rgar
ten
Gen
eral
Lea
rner
Out
com
e (KG
LO #
2.1)
: Par
ticip
ate
coop
erat
ivel
y an
d ap
prop
riate
ly w
ith o
ther
s to
achi
eve
shar
ed g
oals.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n ta
lk a
bout
and
cre
ate
a cl
ass b
ook
abou
t coo
pera
tion
in a
larg
e gr
oup
setti
ng.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t coo
pera
tion.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Nam
e ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith c
oope
ratio
n fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n En
glish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge.
Des
crib
e ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith c
oope
ratio
n fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n En
glish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge. (
e.g.
, “W
ir m
üssen
the
toys
auf
räum
en.”)
Rete
ll a
sequ
ence
of a
ctiv
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
co
oper
atio
n fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n En
glish
and
H
ome
lang
uage
. (e.
g., “
Erst
bist
du d
ran,
then
you
he
lp m
e, v
ersta
nden
?”)
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
Firs
t w
e___
____
____
_, Th
en__
____
____
_, N
ext_
____
____
_
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 1
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial a
nd E
mot
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t E
XAM
PLE
TOPI
C: G
roup
coo
pera
tion
See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
See
exam
ple
of
a co
nnec
tion
to a
Ki
nder
gart
en s
tate
sta
ndar
d
in th
is S
tran
d.
EARL
Y LA
NG
UA
GE
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T A
ND
LIT
ERA
CY
34
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
CON
NEC
TIO
N: M
ississ
ippi
Ear
ly Le
arni
ng S
tand
ards
for C
lassr
oom
s Ser
ving
Thre
e-Ye
ar-O
lds:
Read
ing
Stan
dard
s for
Lite
ratu
re; S
tand
ard
1: W
ith g
uida
nce
and
supp
ort,
ask
and/
or
answ
er q
uesti
ons w
ith d
etai
ls re
late
d to
a v
arie
ty o
f prin
t mat
eria
ls, S
tand
ard
3: W
ith g
uida
nce
and
supp
ort,
iden
tify
com
mon
obj
ects
in th
e pi
ctur
es o
f boo
ks.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
part
icip
ate
in fa
mili
ar li
tera
cy a
ctiv
ities
.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
story
ele
men
ts.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Poin
t to
obje
cts o
r cha
ract
ers b
ased
on
oral
co
mm
ands
usin
g bo
ok il
lustr
atio
ns o
r pho
tos w
ith
an a
dult.
Iden
tify
obje
cts o
r cha
ract
ers b
ased
on
exte
nded
or
al c
omm
ands
usin
g bo
ok il
lustr
atio
ns o
r pho
tos
with
an
adul
t.
Dist
ingu
ish b
etw
een
obje
cts o
r cha
ract
ers b
ased
on
ora
l sta
tem
ents
and/
or q
uesti
ons u
sing
book
ill
ustr
atio
ns o
r pho
tos w
ith a
n ad
ult.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly-a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
, suc
h as
: Sho
w
me_
____
, Fin
d th
e___
__, W
here
is th
e __
____
____
?
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 2
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Ear
ly L
angu
age
Dev
elop
men
t and
Lit
erac
y EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C:
Stor
y el
emen
ts
35EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5
CON
NEC
TIO
N: H
ead
Star
t Chi
ld D
evelo
pmen
t and
Ear
ly Le
arni
ng F
ram
ewor
k: D
omai
n: L
itera
cy K
now
ledge
and
Ski
lls; D
omai
n El
emen
t: Bo
ok A
ppre
ciatio
n &
Kno
wled
ge:
The
inte
rest
in b
ooks
and
thei
r cha
ract
erist
ics,
the
abili
ty to
und
ersta
nd a
nd g
et m
eani
ng fr
om st
orie
s and
info
rmat
ion
from
boo
ks a
nd o
ther
text
s.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n pa
rtic
ipat
e in
fam
iliar
lite
racy
act
iviti
es.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
story
ele
men
ts
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Poin
t to
story
eve
nts b
ased
on
oral
com
man
ds u
sing
book
illu
strat
ions
or p
hoto
s with
an
adul
t. Id
entif
y sto
ry e
vent
s bas
ed o
n ex
tend
ed o
ral
com
man
ds u
sing
book
illu
strat
ions
or p
hoto
s with
an
adu
lt.
Dist
ingu
ish b
etw
een
story
eve
nts b
ased
on
oral
stat
emen
ts an
d/or
que
stion
s usin
g bo
ok
illus
trat
ions
or p
hoto
s with
an
adul
t.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
Show
me_
____
_,
Find
the_
____
____
_, W
here
is th
e __
____
?
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 2
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Ear
ly L
angu
age
Dev
elop
men
t and
Lit
erac
y EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C:
Stor
y el
emen
ts
EARL
Y LA
NG
UA
GE
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T A
ND
LIT
ERA
CY
36
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5
CON
NEC
TIO
N: R
hode
Isla
nd E
arly
Lear
ning
and
Dev
elopm
ent S
tand
ards
; Lite
racy
Dev
elopm
ent f
or D
ual L
angu
age L
earn
ers;
L5a:
Chi
ldre
n be
com
e in
crea
singl
y en
gage
d in
lite
racy
ex
perie
nces
in E
nglis
h.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Com
mon
Cor
e Sta
ndar
ds fo
r Eng
lish
Lang
uage
Art
s, Re
adin
g St
anda
rds f
or L
itera
ture
#3
(Kin
derg
arte
n): W
ith p
rom
ptin
g an
d su
ppor
t, id
entif
y ch
arac
ters
, set
tings
, and
maj
or e
vent
s in
a sto
ry.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
sequ
ence
eve
nts o
f fam
iliar
stor
ies i
n la
rge
grou
ps.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
story
ele
men
ts.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Iden
tify
illus
trat
ed e
vent
s fro
m o
ral s
tate
men
ts us
ing
visu
al su
ppor
ts an
d m
anip
ulat
ives
. Fi
nd il
lustr
ated
eve
nts f
rom
a se
ries o
f rel
ated
ora
l sta
tem
ents
usin
g vi
sual
supp
orts
and
man
ipul
ativ
es.
Sequ
ence
illu
strat
ed e
vent
s fro
m d
escr
iptiv
e or
al
state
men
ts us
ing
visu
al su
ppor
ts an
d m
anip
ulat
ives
.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
first,
nex
t, af
ter,
lastE-
ELD
STA
ND
ARD
2: T
he L
angu
age
of E
arly
Lan
guag
e D
evel
opm
ent a
nd L
iter
acy
EXA
MPL
E TO
PIC:
St
ory
elem
ents
See
exam
ple
of a
co
nnec
tion
to a
sta
te
dual
lang
uage
lear
ner
stan
dard
in th
is
Stra
nd.
See
exam
ple
of a
co
nnec
tion
to a
Com
mon
Co
re K
inde
rgar
ten
St
anda
rd in
this
Str
and.
37EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: F
lorid
a’s E
arly
Lear
ning
& D
evelo
pmen
t Sta
ndar
ds; D
omai
n: L
angu
age a
nd C
omm
unica
tion;
Sub
Dom
ain:
Ear
ly Re
adin
g: S
tand
ard
C.1
: Sho
ws a
n ap
prec
iatio
n an
d en
joym
ent o
f rea
ding
. C.4
: Dem
onstr
ates
com
preh
ensio
n an
d re
spon
ds to
stor
ies.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
talk
abo
ut a
fam
iliar
boo
k du
ring
read
alo
ud ti
me.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent U
ND
ERST
AND
stor
y el
emen
ts.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at n
ames
of o
bjec
ts an
d ch
arac
ters
in b
ook
illus
trat
ions
or p
hoto
s with
adu
lt m
odel
.N
ame
obje
cts a
nd c
hara
cter
s in
book
illu
strat
ions
or
pho
tos w
ith a
dult
prom
pt.
Des
crib
e ob
ject
s and
cha
ract
ers i
n bo
ok il
lustr
atio
ns
or p
hoto
s with
adu
lt pr
ompt
.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
I se
e___
____
____
__,
This
is __
____
____
___
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 2
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Ear
ly L
angu
age
Dev
elop
men
t and
Lit
erac
y EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C:
Stor
y el
emen
ts
EARL
Y LA
NG
UA
GE
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T A
ND
LIT
ERA
CY
38
CON
NEC
TIO
N: G
eorg
ia E
arly
Lear
ning
and
Dev
elopm
ent S
tand
ards
(GEL
DS)
: Dom
ain:
Com
mun
icatio
n, L
angu
age a
nd L
itera
cy; C
LL5:
The
child
will
acq
uire
mea
ning
from
a
varie
ty o
f mat
eria
ls re
ad to
him
/her
.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
talk
abo
ut a
fam
iliar
boo
k du
ring
read
alo
ud ti
me.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent U
ND
ERST
AND
stor
y el
emen
ts.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at la
ngua
ge re
late
d to
mai
n sto
ry e
vent
s usin
g vi
sual
supp
orts
and
adul
t mod
els.
Des
crib
e m
ain
story
eve
nts u
sing
visu
al su
ppor
ts an
d ad
ult p
rom
pts.
Rete
ll m
ain
story
eve
nts u
sing
visu
al su
ppor
ts an
d ad
ult p
rom
pts.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
eatin
g, g
oing
, He
is___
____
___,
She
is__
____
____
_
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 2
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Ear
ly L
angu
age
Dev
elop
men
t and
Lit
erac
y EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C:
Stor
y el
emen
ts
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5
39EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: C
olor
ado
Early
Lea
rnin
g an
d D
evelo
pmen
t Gui
delin
es: D
omai
n: E
nglis
h La
ngua
ge D
evelo
pmen
t; Su
b D
omai
n 3:
Eng
agem
ent i
n En
glish
Lite
racy
Acti
vitie
s: U
nder
stand
ing
and
resp
ondi
ng to
boo
ks, s
tory
telli
ng a
nd so
ngs p
rese
nted
in E
nglis
h.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Col
orad
o Ac
adem
ic St
anda
rds i
n Re
adin
g, W
ritin
g an
d C
omm
unica
ting
Con
tent
Are
a: R
eadi
ng, W
ritin
g, a
nd C
omm
unica
ting;
Sta
ndar
d: 2
: Re
adin
g fo
r All
Purp
oses
.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
rete
ll fa
mili
ar st
orie
s with
a p
artn
er.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent U
ND
ERST
AND
stor
y el
emen
ts.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Nam
e sto
ry o
bjec
ts, c
hara
cter
s and
eve
nts u
sing
visu
al a
nd in
tera
ctiv
e su
ppor
ts (e
.g.,
man
ipul
ativ
es
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge) a
nd p
eer m
odel
s.
Des
crib
e sto
ry o
bjec
ts, c
hara
cter
s and
eve
nts u
sing
visu
al a
nd in
tera
ctiv
e su
ppor
ts (e
.g.,
man
ipul
ativ
es
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge) a
nd p
eer m
odel
s.
Rete
ll sto
ries u
sing
visu
al a
nd in
tera
ctiv
e su
ppor
ts (e
.g.,
man
ipul
ativ
es a
nd H
ome
lang
uage
) and
pee
r m
odel
s.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
Firs
t___
____
__,
Then
____
____
_, N
ext_
____
____
_
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 2
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Ear
ly L
angu
age
Dev
elop
men
t and
Lit
erac
y EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C:
Stor
y el
emen
ts
See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
See
exam
ple
of
a co
nnec
tion
to a
Ki
nder
gart
en s
tate
sta
ndar
d
in th
is S
tran
d.
MAT
HEM
ATIC
S40
CON
NEC
TIO
N: M
issou
ri Ea
rly L
earn
ing
Mat
hem
atics
Sta
ndar
ds; C
onte
nt C
ompo
nent
: Geo
met
ry &
Spa
tial S
ense;
Pro
cess
Stan
dard
: Exp
lore
s sha
pes i
n th
e en
viro
nmen
t.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n cr
eate
pic
ture
s usin
g sh
apes
with
pee
rs in
smal
l gro
up se
tting
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
char
acte
ristic
s of g
eom
etric
shap
es.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Follo
w o
ne-s
tep
oral
com
man
ds a
bout
shap
es
follo
win
g m
odel
s and
usin
g vi
sual
supp
orts
with
an
adul
t. (e
.g.,
“Fin
d th
e ci
rcle
.”)
Follo
w si
mpl
e or
al c
omm
ands
abo
ut sh
apes
fo
llow
ing
mod
els a
nd u
sing
visu
al su
ppor
ts w
ith a
n ad
ult.
(e.g
., “Th
is is
a ci
rcle
. Fin
d a
circ
le.”)
Follo
w o
ral c
omm
ands
abo
ut sh
apes
usin
g vi
sual
su
ppor
ts w
ith a
n ad
ult.
(e.g
., “Th
is is
a ci
rcle
. Hel
p m
e fin
d a
big
circ
le.”)
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
find,
Giv
e m
e th
e __
____
_, lo
ok, c
ircle
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 3
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Mat
hem
atic
s EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: G
eom
etri
c sh
apes
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
EARL
Y LA
NG
UA
GE
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T A
ND
LIT
ERA
CY
CON
NEC
TIO
N: W
ashi
ngto
n St
ate E
arly
Lear
ning
and
Dev
elopm
ent G
uide
lines
Ages
3-4
Year
s. Ar
ea o
f Dev
elopm
ent 6
: Lea
rnin
g ab
out m
y wor
ld: T
opic:
Mat
h: S
ort &
des
crib
e ite
ms
by si
ze, c
olor
and
/or s
hape
; mat
ch si
mpl
e fla
t sha
pes (
circ
le, s
quar
es, t
riang
les)
.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n cr
eate
and
inte
ract
with
pee
rs in
smal
l gro
up se
tting
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
desc
riptiv
e la
ngua
ge.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Iden
tify
shap
es fr
om si
mpl
e or
al st
atem
ents
follo
win
g m
odel
s and
usin
g vi
sual
supp
orts
with
an
adul
t.
Iden
tify
shap
es fr
om o
ral d
escr
iptio
ns fo
llow
ing
mod
els a
nd u
sing
visu
al su
ppor
ts w
ith a
n ad
ult.
Iden
tify
shap
es fr
om o
ral c
ompa
rison
s fol
low
ing
mod
els a
nd u
sing
visu
al su
ppor
ts w
ith a
n ad
ult.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
shap
e, sa
me
as,
look
s lik
e th
is, G
ive
me
the
____
____
__
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 3
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Mat
hem
atic
s EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: G
eom
etri
c sh
apes
41M
ATH
EMAT
ICS
42M
ATH
EMAT
ICS
CON
NEC
TIO
N: G
ood
Star
t Gro
w S
mar
t Sou
th C
arol
ina
Early
Lea
rnin
g St
anda
rds f
or 5
year
-old
Chi
ldre
n: S
tand
ard
K-4:
The
stude
nt w
ill d
emon
strat
e th
roug
h th
e m
athe
mat
ical
pr
oces
s an
emer
ging
sens
e of
two
- and
thre
e-di
men
siona
l geo
met
ric sh
apes
and
rela
tive
posit
ions
in sp
ace.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Com
mon
Cor
e Sta
ndar
ds fo
r Mat
hem
atics
Geo
met
ry #
1(K
inde
rgar
ten)
: Des
crib
e ob
ject
s in
the
envi
ronm
ent u
sing
nam
es o
f sha
pes,
and
desc
ribe
the
rela
tive
posit
ions
of t
hese
obj
ects
usin
g te
rms s
uch
as a
bove
, bel
ow, b
esid
e. EX
AM
PLE
CON
TEX
T FO
R LA
NG
UA
GE
USE
: C
hild
ren
play
gam
es a
nd in
tera
ct w
ith th
eir p
eers
in sm
all g
roup
setti
ngs.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t the
pro
pert
ies o
f geo
met
ric sh
apes
and
pos
ition
s in
spac
e.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Iden
tify
geom
etric
shap
es a
nd th
eir p
ositi
on in
sp
ace
from
ora
l sta
tem
ents
usin
g ph
otos
and
pi
ctur
es w
ith a
n ad
ult.
Iden
tify
geom
etric
shap
es a
nd th
eir p
ositi
on in
sp
ace
from
ext
ende
d or
al d
escr
iptio
ns u
sing
phot
os
and
pict
ures
with
an
adul
t.
Dist
ingu
ish b
etw
een
geom
etric
shap
es a
nd th
eir
posit
ion
in sp
ace
base
d on
ora
l sta
tem
ents
and/
or
ques
tions
usin
g ph
otos
and
pic
ture
s with
an
adul
t.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
abov
e, b
elow
, The
shap
e is_
____
____
____
, I se
e a
shap
e th
at__
____
____
____
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 3
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Mat
hem
atic
s EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: G
eom
etri
c sh
apes
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5 See
exam
ple
of a
co
nnec
tion
to a
Com
mon
Co
re K
inde
rgar
ten
St
anda
rd in
this
Str
and.
43EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: O
klah
oma
Early
lear
ning
Gui
delin
es fo
r Chi
ldre
n Ag
es Th
ree t
hrou
gh F
ive:
Dom
ain:
Mat
hem
atics
Sta
ndar
d 3:
Geo
met
ry a
nd S
patia
l Sen
se: th
e ch
ild w
ill id
entif
y co
mm
on g
eom
etric
shap
es a
nd e
xplo
re th
e re
latio
nshi
p of
obj
ects
in th
e en
viro
nmen
t.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n cr
eate
and
inte
ract
with
pee
rs in
smal
l gro
up se
tting
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t geo
met
ric sh
apes
.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at n
ames
of g
eom
etric
shap
es w
ith v
isual
su
ppor
ts fo
llow
ing
adul
t mod
el.
Nam
e ge
omet
ric sh
apes
with
visu
al su
ppor
ts fo
llow
ing
adul
t pro
mpt
.D
escr
ibe
geom
etric
shap
es w
ith v
isual
supp
orts
follo
win
g ad
ult p
rom
pt.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
big,
smal
l, ci
rcle
, sq
uare
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 3
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Mat
hem
atic
s EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: G
eom
etri
c sh
apes
MAT
HEM
ATIC
S
44M
ATH
EMAT
ICS
CON
NEC
TIO
N: I
llino
is Ea
rly L
earn
ing
and
Dev
elopm
ent S
tand
ards
; Dom
ain:
Mat
hem
atics
Goa
l 9- E
xplo
re co
ncep
ts of
geo
met
ry a
nd sp
atia
l rela
tions
Lea
rnin
g St
anda
rd 9
.A:
Reco
gnize
, nam
e, a
nd m
atch
com
mon
shap
es.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n cr
eate
and
inte
ract
with
pee
rs in
smal
l gro
up se
tting
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t geo
met
ric sh
apes
and
thei
r pro
pert
ies.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Nam
e ge
omet
ric sh
apes
with
visu
al su
ppor
ts fo
llow
ing
adul
t pro
mpt
.D
escr
ibe
geom
etric
shap
es w
ith v
isual
supp
orts
follo
win
g ad
ult p
rom
pt.
Reco
unt i
nfor
mat
ion
rela
ted
to g
eom
etric
shap
es
and
thei
r pro
pert
ies u
sing
visu
al su
ppor
ts an
d ad
ult
prom
pts.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
I ha
ve__
____
____
_, o
val,
flat,
circ
le
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 3
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Mat
hem
atic
s EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: G
eom
etri
c sh
apes
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5
45EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: L
ouisi
ana
Birt
h to
Fiv
e Ear
ly Le
arni
ng a
nd D
evelo
pmen
t Sta
ndar
ds; D
omai
n: C
ogni
tive D
evelo
pmen
t and
Gen
eral
Kno
wled
ge; S
ubdo
mai
n: M
athe
mat
ics; S
tand
ard:
C
M4:
Und
ersta
nd sh
apes
, the
ir pr
oper
ties a
nd h
ow o
bjec
ts ar
e re
late
d to
one
ano
ther
in sp
ace.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Com
mon
Cor
e Sta
ndar
ds fo
r Mat
hem
atics
Geo
met
ry #
1(K
inde
rgar
ten)
: D
escr
ibe
obje
cts i
n th
e en
viro
nmen
t usin
g na
mes
of s
hape
s, an
d de
scrib
e th
e re
lativ
e po
sitio
ns o
f the
se o
bjec
ts us
ing
term
s suc
h as
abo
ve, b
elow
, bes
ide.
#2
(Kin
derg
arte
n): C
orre
ctly
nam
e sh
apes
rega
rdle
ss o
f the
ir or
ient
atio
n of
ove
rall
size.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n pl
ay g
ames
and
inte
ract
with
thei
r pee
rs in
smal
l gro
up se
tting
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t the
pro
pert
ies o
f geo
met
ric sh
apes
and
pos
ition
s in
spac
e.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at n
ames
and
pro
pert
ies o
f geo
met
ric sh
apes
fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n En
glish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge.
Nam
e ge
omet
ric sh
apes
and
thei
r pro
pert
ies
follo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
Engl
ish a
nd H
ome
lang
uage
. (e.
g., “
I see
a ci
rcul
ó bi
g.”)
Des
crib
e ge
omet
ric sh
apes
, the
ir pr
oper
ties a
nd
thei
r pos
ition
in sp
ace
follo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
Engl
ish a
nd H
ome
lang
uage
. (e.
g., “
I see
a tr
iang
le
gran
de.”
“It i
s abo
ve th
e cu
adra
do.”)
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
tria
ngle
, squ
are,
ab
ove,
bel
ow, b
ig, r
ound
, I se
e a_
____
____
___,
It is
___
____
__
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 3
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Mat
hem
atic
s EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: G
eom
etri
c sh
apes
MAT
HEM
ATIC
S
See
exam
ple
of a
co
nnec
tion
to a
Com
mon
Co
re K
inde
rgar
ten
St
anda
rd in
this
Str
and.
See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
46SC
IEN
CE
CON
NEC
TIO
N: D
elaw
are E
arly
Lear
ning
Fou
ndat
ions
Dom
ain:
Disc
over
ies; S
ub-d
omai
n: S
enso
ry A
war
eness
: Lea
rnin
g O
ppor
tuni
ty: S
C31
: Use
sens
es in
pur
pose
ful w
ays t
o ga
ther
in
form
atio
n an
d ex
plor
e th
e en
viro
nmen
t.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n in
vesti
gate
real
-life
obj
ects
and
thei
r cha
ract
erist
ics a
s the
y in
tera
ct w
ith p
eers
in sm
all g
roup
setti
ngs.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
char
acte
ristic
s of o
bjec
ts.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Follo
w o
ne-s
tep
oral
com
man
ds a
bout
obj
ects
follo
win
g m
odel
s and
usin
g vi
sual
supp
orts
with
an
adul
t. (e
.g.,
“Fin
d th
e co
tton
ball.
”)
Follo
w si
mpl
e or
al c
omm
ands
abo
ut o
bjec
ts fo
llow
ing
mod
els a
nd u
sing
visu
al su
ppor
ts w
ith a
n ad
ult.
(e.g
., “Th
is is
soft.
” “F
ind
a so
ft ob
ject
.”)
Follo
w o
ral c
omm
ands
abo
ut o
bjec
ts us
ing
visu
al
supp
orts
with
an
adul
t. (e
.g.,
“This
cotto
n ba
ll is
soft.
” “F
ind
a so
ft ob
ject
.”)
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as l
oud,
smal
l, I
see_
____
__, G
ive
me
the_
____
____
____
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 4
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Sci
ence
EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: O
ur fi
ve s
ense
s
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
47EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: E
arly
Chi
ldho
od In
dica
tors
of P
rogr
ess: M
inne
sota
Ear
ly Le
arni
ng S
tand
ards
: Dom
ain
V: C
ogni
tive D
evelo
pmen
t; C
ompo
nent
Are
a: S
cient
ific Th
inki
ng a
nd P
robl
em
Solv
ing;
Indi
cato
r of P
rogr
ess 7
: Mak
e co
mpa
rison
s bet
wee
n ob
ject
s tha
t hav
e be
en c
olle
cted
or o
bser
ved.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n in
vesti
gate
real
-life
obj
ects
and
thei
r pro
pert
ies a
s the
y in
tera
ct w
ith p
eers
in sm
all g
roup
setti
ngs.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
desc
riptiv
e la
ngua
ge.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Iden
tify
obje
cts f
rom
sim
ple
oral
stat
emen
ts fo
llow
ing
mod
els a
nd u
sing
real
-life
obj
ects
with
an
adul
t.
Iden
tify
obje
cts f
rom
ora
l des
crip
tions
follo
win
g m
odel
s and
usin
g re
al-li
fe o
bjec
ts w
ith a
n ad
ult.
Iden
tify
obje
cts f
rom
ora
l com
paris
ons f
ollo
win
g m
odel
s and
usin
g re
al-li
fe o
bjec
ts w
ith a
n ad
ult.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
soft,
har
d, lo
oks
like
this,
Giv
e m
e th
e __
____
____
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 4
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Sci
ence
EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: S
cien
tific
obs
erva
tion
and
inqu
iry
SCIE
NCE
48SC
IEN
CE
CON
NEC
TIO
N: C
alifo
rnia
Pre
schoo
l Lea
rnin
g Fo
unda
tions
Vol
. 3: P
hysic
al S
cienc
es 1.
Pro
pert
ies o
f mat
eria
ls ca
n be
obs
erve
d, m
easu
red,
and
pre
dicte
d. S
tand
ard
1.1:
Dem
onstr
ate
incr
ease
d ab
ility
to o
bser
ve, i
nves
tigat
e, a
nd d
escr
ibe
in g
reat
er d
etai
l the
cha
ract
erist
ics a
nd p
hysic
al p
rope
rtie
s (siz
e, w
eigh
t, sh
ape,
col
or, t
extu
re, a
nd so
und)
of o
bjec
ts an
d of
so
lid a
nd n
onso
lid m
ater
ials.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Cal
iforn
ia C
onte
nt S
tand
ards
(Kin
derg
arte
n): P
hysic
al S
cienc
es 1.
Pro
pert
ies o
f mat
eria
ls ca
n be
obs
erve
d, m
easu
red,
and
pre
dicte
d. a
. Stu
dent
s kn
ow th
at o
bjec
ts ca
n be
des
crib
ed in
term
s of t
he m
ater
ials
they
are
mad
e of
(e.g
., cl
ay, c
loth
, pap
er) a
nd th
eir p
hysic
al p
rope
rtie
s (e.
g., c
olor
, size
, sha
pe, w
eigh
t, te
xtur
e,
flexi
bilit
y, at
trac
tion
to m
agne
ts, fl
oatin
g, si
nkin
g).
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n pl
ay g
ames
and
inte
ract
with
thei
r pee
rs in
smal
l gro
up se
tting
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t phy
sical
pro
pert
ies o
f obj
ects.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Iden
tify
obje
cts a
nd th
eir p
rope
rtie
s fro
m o
ral
state
men
ts us
ing
real
-life
obj
ects
with
an
adul
t. Id
entif
y ob
ject
s and
thei
r pro
pert
ies f
rom
ext
ende
d or
al d
escr
iptio
ns u
sing
real
-life
obj
ects
with
an
adul
t.
Dist
ingu
ish b
etw
een
obje
cts a
nd th
eir p
rope
rtie
s ba
sed
on o
ral s
tate
men
ts an
d/or
que
stion
s usin
g re
al-li
fe o
bjec
ts w
ith a
n ad
ult.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as s
hape
, sou
nd,
text
ure,
I se
e an
obj
ect t
hat_
____
____
___,
The
obje
ct fe
els_
____
____
_
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 4
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Sci
ence
EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: S
cien
tific
obs
erva
tion
and
inqu
iry
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5 See
exam
ple
of
a co
nnec
tion
to a
Ki
nder
gart
en s
tate
sta
ndar
d
in th
is S
tran
d.
49EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: K
entu
cky E
arly
child
hood
Sta
ndar
ds: (
3S A
ND
4S)
Scie
nce S
tand
ard
1: D
emon
strat
es sc
ient
ific
way
s of t
hink
ing
and
wor
king
(with
won
der a
nd c
urio
sity)
.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n in
vesti
gate
real
-life
obj
ects
and
thei
r cha
ract
erist
ics a
s the
y in
tera
ct w
ith p
eers
in sm
all g
roup
setti
ngs.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t phy
sical
pro
pert
ies o
f obj
ects,
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at n
ames
of o
bjec
ts us
ing
real
-life
obj
ects
with
ad
ult m
odel
. N
ame
obje
cts u
sing
real
-life
obj
ects
with
adu
lt pr
ompt
.D
escr
ibe
obje
cts u
sing
real
-life
obj
ects
with
adu
lt pr
ompt
.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
I see
a
____
____
___,
It is
____
____
___
long
, big
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 4
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Sci
ence
EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: S
cien
tific
obs
erva
tion
and
inqu
iry
SCIE
NCE
50SC
IEN
CE
CON
NEC
TIO
N: O
hio
Early
Lea
rnin
g an
d D
evelo
pmen
t Sta
ndar
ds: D
omai
n: C
ogni
tive a
nd G
ener
al K
now
ledge
; Sub
-dom
ain:
Scie
nce;
Stra
nd: S
cienc
e Inq
uiry
and
App
licat
ion;
Top
ic:
Inqu
iry;
Stan
dard
stat
emen
t: Re
cord
obs
erva
tions
usin
g w
ords
, pic
ture
s, ch
arts,
gra
phs,
etc.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n di
scus
s and
reco
rd th
eir o
bser
vatio
ns in
smal
l gro
up se
tting
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t sci
entifi
c in
vesti
gatio
ns.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at w
ords
and
phr
ases
ass
ocia
ted
with
scie
nce
inve
stiga
tions
follo
win
g ad
ult m
odel
usin
g vi
sual
su
ppor
ts.
Des
crib
e ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith sc
ienc
e in
vesti
gatio
ns fo
llow
ing
adul
t mod
el u
sing
visu
al
supp
orts.
Reco
unt a
ctiv
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
scie
nce
inve
stiga
tions
follo
win
g ad
ult p
rom
pt u
sing
visu
al
supp
orts.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
char
t, so
lid,
liqui
d, F
irst w
e___
___,
Nex
t we_
____
____
_
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 4
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Sci
ence
EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: S
cien
tific
obs
erva
tion
and
inqu
iry
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5
51EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: V
irgin
ia F
ound
atio
n Bl
ocks
for E
arly
Lear
ning
: Com
preh
ensiv
e Sta
ndar
ds fo
r Fou
r-Ye
ar-O
lds;
Scien
ce F
ound
atio
n Bl
ock
3: M
atte
r / P
hysic
al P
rope
rties
; Sta
ndar
d:
The
child
will
dev
elop
lang
uage
to d
escr
ibe
phys
ical
pro
pert
ies o
f obj
ects
and
use
the
iden
tified
pro
pert
ies t
o so
rt th
e ob
ject
s.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Virg
inia
Kin
derg
arte
n St
anda
rds o
f Lea
rnin
g; S
cienc
e; St
anda
rd: K
. 4: Th
e stu
dent
will
inve
stiga
te a
nd u
nder
stand
that
the
posit
ion,
mot
ion,
an
d ph
ysic
al p
rope
rtie
s of a
n ob
ject
can
be
desc
ribed
. Key
con
cept
s inc
lude
a) c
olor
s of o
bjec
ts; b
) sha
pes a
nd fo
rms o
f obj
ects;
c) t
extu
res a
nd fe
el o
f obj
ects;
d) r
elat
ive
sizes
and
w
eigh
ts of
obj
ects;
and
e) r
elat
ive
posit
ions
and
spee
d of
obj
ects.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n pl
ay g
ames
and
inte
ract
with
thei
r pee
rs in
smal
l gro
up se
tting
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t sci
entifi
c in
vesti
gatio
ns.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at n
ames
of r
eal-l
ife o
bjec
ts an
d th
eir
prop
ertie
s fol
low
ing
peer
mod
els i
n En
glish
and
H
ome
lang
uage
.
Nam
e re
al-li
fe o
bjec
ts an
d th
eir p
rope
rtie
s fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n En
glish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge.
Des
crib
e re
al-li
fe o
bjec
ts an
d th
eir p
rope
rtie
s fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n En
glish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge. (
e.g.
, “I s
ee a
big
blo
ck.”
“Es h
eavy
com
o th
e ro
ck ta
mbi
én.”)
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as s
olid
, liq
uid,
ro
ugh,
smal
ler t
han_
____
____
_ sm
ooth
like
____
____
____
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 4
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Sci
ence
EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: S
cien
tific
obs
erva
tion
and
inqu
iry
SCIE
NCE
See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
See
exam
ple
of
a co
nnec
tion
to a
Ki
nder
gart
en s
tate
sta
ndar
d
in th
is S
tran
d.
52SO
CIA
L
STU
DIE
S
CON
NEC
TIO
N: N
ew M
exico
Pre
schoo
l and
Kin
derg
arte
n Ea
rly L
earn
ing
Gui
delin
es: D
omai
n 6:
Self
, Fam
ily, a
nd C
omm
unity
; Out
com
e 17:
The c
hild
exhi
bits
self-a
war
eness
; Esse
ntia
l In
dica
tor:
17.4
: Exp
ress
es c
ultu
ral i
nflue
nces
from
hom
e, n
eigh
borh
ood
and
com
mun
ity.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n cr
eate
fam
ily c
olla
ges i
n sm
all g
roup
setti
ngs.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t fam
ily m
embe
rs.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Poin
t to
fam
ily m
embe
rs fr
om sh
ort o
ral
com
man
ds u
sing
phot
os a
nd p
ictu
res w
ith a
n ad
ult.
(e.g
., “P
oint
to m
omm
y.”)
Iden
tify
fam
ily m
embe
rs fr
om o
ral c
omm
ands
us
ing
phot
os a
nd p
ictu
res w
ith a
n ad
ult.
(e.g
., “F
ind
the
big
brot
her.”
)
Dist
ingu
ish b
etw
een
fam
ily m
embe
rs fr
om
exte
nded
ora
l com
man
ds u
sing
phot
os a
nd p
ictu
res
with
an
adul
t. (e
.g.,
“Sho
w m
e th
e ba
by si
ster”
)
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
Show
me_
____
_,
Find
___
____
, Whe
re is
___
____
__?
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 5
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial S
tudi
es
EXA
MPL
E TO
PIC:
Fam
ilies
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
53EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: V
erm
ont E
arly
Lear
ning
Sta
ndar
ds (V
ELS)
: Dom
ain
VI: S
ocia
l Stu
dies;
Lea
rnin
g G
oal a
nd D
efini
tion
3: P
eopl
e and
How
They
Liv
e: C
hild
ren
dem
onstr
ate
skill
s re
late
d to
und
ersta
ndin
g, c
omm
unic
atio
n, sh
arin
g, c
oope
ratio
n an
d pa
rtic
ipat
ion
with
oth
ers i
n a
com
mun
ity.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n cr
eate
and
liste
n to
cla
ssro
om b
ooks
in a
larg
e gr
oup
setti
ng.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t fam
ilies
.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Iden
tify
self
and/
or p
eers
from
ora
l sta
tem
ents
usin
g ph
otos
and
pic
ture
s with
an
adul
t.Id
entif
y se
lf an
d/or
pee
rs fr
om o
ral d
escr
iptio
ns
usin
g ph
otos
and
pic
ture
s with
an
adul
t.D
istin
guish
bet
wee
n se
lf an
d/or
pee
rs fr
om o
ral
desc
riptio
ns w
ith d
etai
ls us
ing
phot
os a
nd p
ictu
res
with
an
adul
t.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
Show
m
e___
____
____
, Whe
re is
____
____
____
_? S
he h
as__
____
____
____
_, H
e is_
____
____
__
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 5
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial S
tudi
es
EXA
MPL
E TO
PIC:
Sim
ilari
ties
/diff
eren
ces
betw
een
self
and
othe
rs
SOCI
AL
ST
UD
IES
54SO
CIA
L
STU
DIE
S
CON
NEC
TIO
N: A
lask
a Ea
rly L
earn
ing
Gui
delin
es: D
omai
n: C
ogni
tion
and
Gen
eral
Kno
wled
ge; S
ub-d
omai
n: F
amily
, Com
mun
ity a
nd C
ultu
re; D
omai
n C
ompo
nent
: Fam
ily; G
oal
Stat
emen
t: 51
: Chi
ldre
n de
mon
strat
e aw
aren
ess o
f fam
ily c
hara
cter
istic
s and
func
tions
.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Ind
iana
Aca
dem
ic St
anda
rds:
Socia
l Stu
dies:
Sta
ndar
d 2
— C
ivics
and
Gov
ernm
ent:
Stud
ents
lear
n th
at th
ey a
re c
itize
ns o
f the
ir sc
hool
, co
mm
unity
and
the
Uni
ted
Stat
es; i
dent
ify sy
mbo
ls of
the
natio
n; a
nd u
nder
stand
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f bei
ng a
resp
onsib
le c
itize
n w
ho k
now
s why
rule
s are
nee
ded
and
follo
ws
them
.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n cr
eate
boo
ks a
bout
fam
ily m
embe
rs a
nd ro
les w
ithin
smal
l gro
up se
tting
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
desc
riptiv
e la
ngua
ge.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Iden
tify
fam
ily m
embe
rs fr
om o
ral y
es/n
o qu
estio
ns
usin
g vi
sual
supp
orts
and
adul
t mod
els.
(e.g
., “I
s th
is D
addy
?”)
Dist
ingu
ish fa
mily
mem
bers
from
ora
l yes
/no
ques
tions
usin
g vi
sual
supp
orts
with
an
adul
t. (e
.g.,
“Is t
his y
our d
ad o
r you
r bro
ther
?”)
Find
fam
ily m
embe
rs fr
om w
h-qu
estio
ns u
sing
visu
al su
ppor
ts w
ith a
n ad
ult.
(e.g
., “W
ho is
this?
W
here
is y
our b
ig si
ster?
”)
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
role
, fam
ily, F
ind
____
____
and
____
____
, Whe
re is
____
____
_?
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 5
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial S
tudi
es
EXA
MPL
E TO
PIC:
Fam
ilies
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5 See
exam
ple
of
a co
nnec
tion
to a
Ki
nder
gart
en s
tate
sta
ndar
d
in th
is S
tran
d.
55EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: M
assa
chus
etts
Gui
delin
es fo
r Pre
schoo
l Lea
rnin
g Ex
perie
nces;
Gui
ding
Pre
schoo
l Lea
rnin
g in
Hist
ory a
nd S
ocia
l Scie
nce;
Lear
ning
Gui
delin
e 4: E
ngag
e in
act
iviti
es
that
bui
ld u
nder
stand
ing
of w
ords
for l
ocat
ion
and
dire
ctio
n.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
talk
abo
ut a
nd d
ram
atize
way
s the
y tr
avel
from
one
pla
ce to
ano
ther
in sm
all g
roup
setti
ngs.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t tra
vel.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at n
ames
of v
ehic
les a
nd a
ssoc
iate
d ac
tions
fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n En
glish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge.
Nam
e ve
hicl
es a
nd a
ssoc
iate
d ac
tions
follo
win
g pe
er
mod
els i
n En
glish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge.
Des
crib
e ve
hicl
es a
nd a
ssoc
iate
d ac
tions
follo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
Engl
ish a
nd H
ome
lang
uage
.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
bus,
truc
k, c
ar, I
go
____
_
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 5
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial S
tudi
es
EXA
MPL
E TO
PIC:
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
SOCI
AL
ST
UD
IES
See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
56SO
CIA
L
STU
DIE
S
CON
NEC
TIO
N: R
evise
d Te
nness
ee E
arly
Lear
ning
Dev
elopm
enta
l Sta
ndar
ds fo
r Fou
r- Y
ear -
Old
s (T
N-E
LDS)
; Soc
ial S
tudi
es; C
aree
r Dev
elopm
ent;
Stan
dard
SS.
PK.8
: Dev
elop
aw
aren
ess a
bout
a w
ide
varie
ty o
f car
eers
and
wor
k en
viro
nmen
ts.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
talk
abo
ut a
nd c
reat
e a
clas
s boo
k ab
out o
ccup
atio
ns in
a la
rge
grou
p se
tting
.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t occ
upat
ions
.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Nam
e co
mm
unity
wor
kers
usin
g vi
sual
supp
orts
and
adul
t pro
mpt
s. D
escr
ibe
com
mun
ity w
orke
rs u
sing
visu
al su
ppor
ts an
d ad
ult p
rom
pts.
Reco
unt i
nfor
mat
ion
rela
ted
to c
omm
unity
wor
kers
us
ing
visu
al su
ppor
ts an
d ad
ult p
rom
pts.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
posta
l wor
ker,
groc
er, p
ost o
ffice
, sup
erm
arke
t, H
e w
orks
at_
____
____
___,
She
is a
___
____
____
__
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 5
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial S
tudi
es
EXA
MPL
E TO
PIC:
Com
mun
ity
Wor
kers
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5
57EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: N
evad
a Pr
ekin
derg
arte
n St
anda
rds:
Socia
l Stu
dies/
Socia
l Em
otio
nal;
Con
tent
Sta
ndar
d: E
c9: Th
e Mar
ket E
cono
my;
Prek
inde
rgar
ten
Indi
cato
r: PK
.2: D
emon
strat
e th
e ro
le o
f diff
eren
t job
s in
the
com
mun
ity.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Nev
ada
Acad
emic
Con
tent
Sta
ndar
ds: S
ocia
l Stu
dies
(Kin
derg
arte
n) C
onte
nt S
tand
ard:
Ec9
: The M
arke
t Eco
nom
y; Ki
nder
gart
en In
dica
tor:
K.2:
Id
entif
y jo
bs in
the
com
mun
ity.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE:
Chi
ldre
n ta
lk a
bout
and
role
pla
y di
ffere
nt o
ccup
atio
ns in
smal
l gro
up se
tting
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t occ
upat
ions
.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at w
ords
and
fam
iliar
phr
ases
ass
ocia
ted
with
oc
cupa
tions
follo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
Engl
ish a
nd
Hom
e la
ngua
ge.
Des
crib
e ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith o
ccup
atio
ns
follo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
Engl
ish a
nd H
ome
lang
uage
. (e.
g., “
I be
my
papa
. My
papa
wor
ks in
l’u
sine.”
)
Pers
uade
pee
rs to
par
ticip
ate
in a
ctiv
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
occ
upat
ions
follo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
Engl
ish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge. (
e.g.
, “I b
e th
e bu
s driv
er, y
ou
be la
maî
tresse
.”)
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
bank
er, p
ilot,
bus
driv
er
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 5
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Soc
ial S
tudi
es
EXA
MPL
E TO
PIC:
Com
mun
ity
Wor
kers
SOCI
AL
ST
UD
IES
See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
See
exam
ple
of
a co
nnec
tion
to a
Ki
nder
gart
en s
tate
sta
ndar
d
in th
is S
tran
d.
58PH
YSIC
AL
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T
CON
NEC
TIO
N: U
tah
Early
Chi
ldho
od C
ore S
tand
ards
; Lea
rnin
g Ar
ea:
Phys
ical /
Hea
lth a
nd S
afet
y; St
anda
rd 1
: The
child
dev
elop
s fine
and
gro
ss m
otor
coo
rdin
atio
n.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
play
and
mov
e to
mus
ic w
ithin
larg
e gr
oup
setti
ngs.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t mov
emen
t.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Follo
w o
ne-s
tep
oral
com
man
ds fo
llow
ing
mod
els
and
usin
g ge
sture
s with
an
adul
t. Fo
llow
sim
ple
oral
com
man
ds u
sing
gestu
res w
ith
an a
dult.
Fo
llow
ora
l com
man
ds u
sing
gestu
res w
ith a
n ad
ult.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
stop,
jum
p, tu
rn
arou
nd
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 6
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Phy
sica
l Dev
elop
men
t EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: M
usic
and
mov
emen
t
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
59EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: M
onta
na E
arly
Lear
ning
Sta
ndar
ds; C
ore D
omai
n: P
hysic
al; S
ub d
omai
n: P
hysic
al d
evelo
pmen
t Sta
ndar
d 2.
2: G
ross
Mot
or S
kills
: Chi
ldre
n de
velo
p la
rge
mus
cle
stren
gth,
coo
rdin
atio
n, a
nd sk
ills.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
play
and
mov
e to
mus
ic w
ithin
larg
e gr
oup
setti
ngs.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
NAL
YZE
desc
riptiv
e la
ngua
ge.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Iden
tify
simpl
e ac
tions
from
ora
l sta
tem
ents
follo
win
g m
odel
s and
usin
g in
tera
ctiv
e su
ppor
ts w
ith a
n ad
ult.
Iden
tify
actio
ns fr
om o
ral d
escr
iptio
ns fo
llow
ing
mod
els a
nd u
sing
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts
with
a
part
ner.
Iden
tify
actio
ns fr
om o
ral c
ompa
rison
s fol
low
ing
mod
els a
nd u
sing
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts
with
a
part
ner.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
Jum
p lik
e a
____
____
___,
Cra
wl s
low
ly li
ke a
___
____
____
___,
fas
ter,
slow
er
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 6
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Phy
sica
l Dev
elop
men
t EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: M
usic
and
mov
emen
t
PHYS
ICA
L D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
60PH
YSIC
AL
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T
CON
NEC
TIO
N: H
ead
Star
t Chi
ld D
evelo
pmen
t and
Ear
ly Le
arni
ng F
ram
ewor
k D
omai
n; P
hysic
al D
evelo
pmen
t & H
ealth
; Dom
ain
Elem
ent:
Gro
ss M
otor
Ski
lls: Th
e co
ntro
l of l
arge
m
uscl
es fo
r mov
emen
t, na
viga
tion,
and
bal
ance
, and
Dom
ain:
Cre
ativ
e Art
s Exp
ressi
on D
omai
n El
emen
t: C
reat
ive M
ovem
ent a
nd D
ance
: The
use
of th
e bo
dy to
mov
e to
mus
ic a
nd
expr
ess o
nese
lf.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Nor
th C
arol
ina
Essen
tial S
tand
ards
; Phy
sical
Edu
catio
n: S
tand
ard:
K.M
S.1:
App
ly c
ompe
tent
mot
or sk
ills a
nd m
ovem
ent p
atte
rns n
eede
d to
pe
rform
a v
arie
ty o
f phy
sical
act
iviti
es.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
play
and
mov
e to
mus
ic w
ithin
larg
e gr
oup
setti
ngs.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent A
PPLY
act
ions
of a
nim
als t
o th
eir o
wn
body
mov
emen
ts.
DOMAIN: Receptive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Act o
ut a
ctio
ns fr
om si
mpl
e or
al st
atem
ents
usin
g vi
sual
and
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts
(e.g
., ge
sture
s and
H
ome
lang
uage
) and
pee
r mod
els.
Act o
ut a
ctio
ns fr
om sh
ort o
ral d
escr
iptio
ns u
sing
visu
al a
nd in
tera
ctiv
e su
ppor
ts (e
.g.,
gestu
res a
nd
Hom
e la
ngua
ge) a
nd p
eer m
odel
s.
Act o
ut a
ctio
ns fr
om a
serie
s of o
ral d
escr
iptio
ns
usin
g vi
sual
and
inte
ract
ive
supp
orts
(e.g
., ge
sture
s an
d H
ome
lang
uage
) and
pee
r mod
els.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
Faste
r th
an__
____
____
__, S
low
er th
an__
____
___,
Firs
t, m
ove
like
a __
____
__ a
nd th
en a
___
____
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 6
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Phy
sica
l Dev
elop
men
t EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: M
usic
and
mov
emen
t
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5 See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
See
exam
ple
of
a co
nnec
tion
to a
Ki
nder
gart
en s
tate
sta
ndar
d
in th
is S
tran
d.
61EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: M
ichig
an E
arly
Chi
ldho
od S
tand
ards
of Q
ualit
y for
Pre
kind
erga
rten
; Dom
ain:
Soc
ial,
Emot
iona
l & P
hysic
al H
ealth
and
Dev
elopm
ent;
5. E
arly
Lear
ning
Exp
ecta
tion:
G
ross
Mot
or D
evelo
pmen
t: C
hild
ren
expe
rienc
e gr
owth
in g
ross
mot
or d
evel
opm
ent a
nd u
se la
rge
mus
cles
to im
prov
e a
varie
ty o
f gro
ss m
otor
skill
s in
a va
riety
of b
oth
struc
ture
d an
d un
struc
ture
d an
d pl
anne
d an
d sp
onta
neou
s set
tings
.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
talk
, pla
y, an
d in
tera
ct w
ith th
eir p
eers
out
door
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent w
ill A
PPLY
app
ropr
iate
trav
elin
g sk
ills w
hen
play
ing
outd
oors
.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at a
ctiv
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
out
door
pla
y fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n sm
all g
roup
s in
Engl
ish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge.
Nam
e ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith o
utdo
or p
lay
follo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
smal
l gro
ups i
n En
glish
an
d H
ome
lang
uage
.
Des
crib
e ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith o
utdo
or p
lay
follo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
smal
l gro
ups i
n En
glish
an
d H
ome
lang
uage
.
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
run,
up,
slid
e, in
, Le
t’s g
o___
_
AG
ES: 2
.5–3
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 6
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Phy
sica
l Dev
elop
men
t EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: O
utdo
or p
lay
PHYS
ICA
L D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
62M
ATH
EMAT
ICS
SCIE
NCE
PHYS
ICA
L D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
CON
NEC
TIO
N: M
aryla
nd M
odel
of S
choo
l Rea
dine
ss-M
MSR
/ Sta
te C
urric
ulum
Fra
mew
ork
& S
tand
ards
; Con
tent
Are
a: P
hysic
al D
evelo
pmen
t; St
anda
rd 1
: St
uden
ts w
ill
dem
onstr
ate
the
abili
ty to
enh
ance
thei
r per
form
ance
of a
var
iety
of p
hysic
al sk
ills b
y de
velo
ping
fund
amen
tal m
ovem
ent s
kills
, cre
atin
g or
igin
al sk
ill c
ombi
natio
ns, c
ombi
ning
sk
ills e
ffect
ivel
y in
skill
them
es, a
nd a
pply
ing
skill
s.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
talk
, pla
y, an
d in
tera
ct w
ith th
eir p
eers
out
door
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent w
ill A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t mov
emen
t.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at w
ords
and
fam
iliar
phr
ases
ass
ocia
ted
with
ou
tdoo
r pla
y fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n sm
all g
roup
s in
Eng
lish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge.
Des
crib
e ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith o
utdo
or p
lay
follo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
Engl
ish a
nd H
ome
lang
uage
.
Reco
unt a
ctiv
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
out
door
pla
y fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n En
glish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge. (
e.g.
, “Ku
v cia
j bik
e. K
oj ca
ij bi
ke. W
b m
us ce
ev.”
)
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
fast,
up,
slid
e,
Let’s
go_
___
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 6
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Phy
sica
l Dev
elop
men
t EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: O
utdo
or p
lay
AG
ES: 3
.5–4
.5 See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
63EA
RLY
LAN
GU
AG
E D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
AN
D L
ITER
AC
Y
CON
NEC
TIO
N: G
eorg
ia E
arly
Lear
ning
and
Dev
elopm
ent S
tand
ards
(GEL
DS)
; Dom
ain:
Phy
sical
Dev
elopm
ent &
Mot
or S
kills
; Sta
ndar
d PD
M5:
The
child
will
dem
onstr
ate
gros
s m
otor
skill
s.
KIN
DER
GA
RTEN
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
: Geo
rgia
Per
form
ance
Sta
ndar
ds: P
hysic
al E
duca
tion:
Sta
ndar
d: P
EK.1
: Dem
onstr
ates
com
pete
ncy
in m
otor
skill
s and
mov
emen
t pat
tern
s ne
eded
to p
erfo
rm a
var
iety
of a
ctiv
ities
.
EXA
MPL
E CO
NTE
XT
FOR
LAN
GU
AG
E U
SE: C
hild
ren
talk
, pla
y an
d in
tera
ct w
ith th
eir p
eers
out
door
s.
COG
NIT
IVE
FUN
CTI
ON
: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent w
ill A
PPLY
thei
r kno
wle
dge
abou
t mov
emen
t.
DOMAIN: Expressive
Leve
l 1En
teri
ngLe
vel 3
Dev
elop
ing
Leve
l 5Br
idgi
ng
Repe
at w
ords
and
fam
iliar
phr
ases
ass
ocia
ted
with
out
door
pla
y fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n sm
all
grou
ps.
Des
crib
e ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith o
utdo
or p
lay
follo
win
g pe
er m
odel
s in
smal
l gro
ups i
n En
glish
an
d H
ome
lang
uage
. (e.
g., “
I go
in tu
nnel
.”)
Pers
uade
pee
rs to
par
ticip
ate
in a
ctiv
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
out
door
pla
y fo
llow
ing
peer
mod
els i
n sm
all
grou
ps in
Eng
lish
and
Hom
e la
ngua
ge. (
e.g.
, “I
wan
t the
red
bike
. You
get
the
patin
eta.”
)
TOPI
C-RE
LATE
D L
AN
GU
AG
E: C
hild
ren
at a
ll le
vels
of la
ngua
ge d
evel
opm
ent i
nter
act w
ith d
evel
opm
enta
lly a
ppro
pria
te w
ords
and
exp
ress
ions
such
as:
up, s
lide,
Let
’s go
____
AG
ES: 4
.5–5
.5
E-EL
D S
TAN
DA
RD 6
: The
Lan
guag
e of
Phy
sica
l Dev
elop
men
t EX
AM
PLE
TOPI
C: O
utdo
or p
lay
PHYS
ICA
L D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
See
exam
ple
of
tran
slan
guag
ing
in
this
Str
and.
See
exam
ple
of
a co
nnec
tion
to a
Ki
nder
gart
en s
tate
sta
ndar
d
in th
is S
tran
d.
64
Appendix A: Glossarycognitive function: the mental processes involved in learning
cognitive development: cognitive changes occurring in terms of mental representation
complex sentence: one independent clause joined by one or more dependent clauses with a subordinator such as because, since, after, although, or when, or a relative pronoun such as that, who, or which (e.g., I like my teacher because she’s funny!)
compound sentence: two or more independent clauses joined by coordinating conjunctions (e.g., for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so) (e.g., I’m playing, but I’m tired; I’m hungry, and I’m eating.)
comprehensible language: forms, conventions, and fluency used in words, phrases and sentences that allow for understanding
connection to early learning standards: component of the standards matrix that shows examples of the correspondence of language to content standards
content stem: element of Model Performance Indicators, derived from a topic within states’ Early Learning Standards, that provides a standards-referenced example for contextualizing language development
developmentally appropriate practice: teaching practices that are based on knowledge of the age-related characteristics, processes, and sequences of early learning and skill development; meet children where they are in the developmental process, and “ensure that experiences and goals are challenging enough to promote their progress and interest” (NAEYC, 2013)
developmentally appropriate academic language: the receptive and expressive language required to fully participate in an early care and education (ECE) program that entails age-appropriate understanding of the social, instructional, and academic language of concept development used within an ECE environment; revolves around meaningful application of specific criteria related to Linguistic Complexity at the discourse level, and Language Usage at the word/phrase and sentence levels within the particular context in which communication occurs.
discourse: extended oral or written language conveying multiple connected ideas; its language features are shaped by the genre, text type, situation, and register
domains: a component in the standards matrix that indicates the modality of language (e.g. expressive and productive) being addressed in the particular matrix. Note that some state early learning standards often refer to the major areas of development and learning as domains (e.g., domain of social and emotional development); domain within context of E-ELD standards refers to the modalities of language (see language domains)
dual language learners (DLL): children, birth-8 years, who are acquiring two or more languages either simultaneously or sequentially as well as developing within two or more cultures
65
early care and education (ECE): refers to care and education settings and programs that serve children birth-age 5, including child care, home-visiting, preschool, Head Start, and 4-year-old Kindergarten
Early English Language Development (E-ELD) Standards Framework: the structure that supports the conceptualization, design, and implementation of the components representing the six WIDA E-ELD Standards and that shows the relationship and interaction among those components. The components of the E-ELD Standards Framework include the Guiding Principles of Language Development and the WIDA Can Do Philosophy, Developmentally Appropriate Academic Language in Sociocultural Contexts, the Performance Definitions, the Standards and their Matrices, and the Can Do Descriptors
early language development: unique period of language development that occurs within the first 5 years of life in which children are learning the basic competencies of their language(s)
early language standards: language expectations for dual language learners, ages 2.5-5.5 years, represented within progressive levels of language development
Early Learning Standards (ELS): developmentally appropriate expectations and desired outcomes for children between birth-5 years in the major areas of development and learning (e.g., social and emotional, physical, language and early literacy, cognitive, and approaches to learning)
example context for language use: component of the standards matrix situating the representation of the Early English language development standards within a sociocultural setting that considers the register, genre/text type, topic, and task
example topic: component of the standards matrix listing a theme or concept derived from national and state early learning standards that provides a context for language development
expanded sentences: complete thoughts that contain descriptive language or two ideas that are combined using connectors (and, but, or)
expressive language: communicating meaning through language
Features of Developmentally Appropriate Academic Language: the performance criteria of oral communication for social and academic purposes that include Linguistic Complexity at the discourse level and Language Usage at the sentence and word/phrase levels
formulaic phrases: a feature of academic language at the sentence level that represents a string of words acquired as a single chunk, such as “My turn”
Framework: see Early English Language Development (E-ELD) Standards Framework
general language: words or expressions not typically associated with the content of a specific area of development and learning (e.g. Show me ___; Clap your hands)
genres: socially defined ways in which oral and written language is used to participate in particular contexts to serve specific purposes
66
home language: a term used in the field of early care and education to denote the first language(s) dual language learners acquire; children who hear and speak more than one language at home and/or with their primary caregivers would have two home language(s) as their first languages; English may or may not be one of the home languages of dual language learners
language development: child’s level of competence in processing (receptive) and producing (expressive) language
language domains: the modalities of language; expressive and receptive
language function: the purpose for which oral or written communication is being used; language functions guide the choices in language use and structure as well as the social relationships being established; first element of Model Performance Indicators that indicates how emergent bilinguals process or use language to demonstrate their language development
language scaffolding: careful design of learning spaces and situations, including shaping of the supports (e.g., processes, environment, and materials) used to build on children’s already acquired skills and knowledge to support their progress from level to level of language development
language supports: sensory, graphic, and interactive resources embedded in routines, learning activities, and assessment that assist children in constructing meaning from language and content; third element of Model Performance Indicators
Language Usage: the grammatical structures, patterns, syntax and mechanics, and the phrases and words associated with processing or expressing meaning; one of the criteria that constitute the Performance Definitions
levels of language development: the division of the second language acquisition continuum into stages descriptive of the process of language development; the WIDA E-ELD Standards have three levels of language development: 1–Entering, 3–Developing, 5–Bridging
Linguistic Complexity: the organization, cohesion, and relationship between ideas expressed in the variety and kinds of sentences that make up different genres and text types in oral or written language at the discourse level; one of two criteria that constitute the Performance Definitions
Model Performance Indicator (MPI): a single cell within a strand of MPIs that is descriptive of a specific level of English language development for a language domain within an age cluster
Performance Definitions: the criteria that define the Linguistic Complexity and Language Usage for receptive and expressive language across the three levels of language development
receptive language: the processing of language through listening and reading
register: features of language that vary according to the context, the groups of users and purpose of the communication (e.g., the speech used when children talk to their teacher)
67
simple sentence: an independent clause with a subject and a predicate; can also have a compound subject and/or predicate (e.g., “The children and teachers were excited.”)
social language: the everyday registers used in interactions outside and inside ECE programs
sociocultural context: the association of language with the culture and society in which it is used; during the early years, this includes family’s sociocultural context for language use and the relationships with adults in ECE and community environments in which children develop language
specific language: words or expressions used across multiple developmentally appropriate academic content areas (e.g. name, letter)
Standards Matrix: the basic organization for representing the WIDA E-ELD Standards, including a strand of Model Performance Indicators (MPIs), connection to state early learning standards, example context for language use, cognitive function, and topic-related language
Strand of Model Performance Indicators (MPIs): the three sequential or scaffolded levels of English language development for a given topic and language domain
supports: see language supports
technical language: the most precise words or expressions associated with topics within developmentally appropriate academic content areas
text types: categories of text that employ particular language features for specific purposes
translanguaging: the act performed by dual language learners of accessing different linguistic features of various languages in order to maximize their understanding and communication
topic-related language: age-cluster words and expressions, including those with multiple meanings and cognates, that are associated with the example topic within the standards matrix
visual support: accompanying the use of written or oral language with photographs, pictures, illustrations, charts, graphs, graphic organizers, etc., to give DLLs additional opportunities to access meaning
68
Appendix B: Selected ReferencesAnstrom, K., DiCerbo, P., Butler, F., Katz, A., Millet, J., & Rivera, C. (2010). A review of the literature
on academic English: Implications for K–12 English language learners. Arlington, VA: The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.
August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2008). Developing reading and writing in second-language learners: Lessons from the report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., Stevens, R., & Lord, C. (2007). Further specifying the language demands of school. In A. L. Bailey (Ed.), The language demands of school: Putting academic language to the test (pp. 103–156). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Brown, D. H. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson.
BUILD Initiative. (2012). Top ten recommendations for state leaders implementing Kindergarten entry assessments. Retrieved online March 9, 2013 at www.elccollaborative.org/assessment/77-kindergarten-entry-assessment.html
Cloud, N., Genesee, F., & Hamayan, E. (2009). Literacy instruction for English language learners: A teacher’s guide to research-based practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Commins, N. (2012). How do English language learners learn content area concepts through their second language? In E. Hamayan & R. Freeman-Field (Eds.), English language learners at school: A guide for administrators (pp. 44–46). Philadelphia, PA: Caslon Publishing.
Cook, H. G. & Zhao, Y. (2011). How English language proficiency assessments manifest growth: An examination of language proficiency growth in a WIDA state. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association conference, New Orleans, LA.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Dickinson, D. K. (2011). Teachers’ language practices and academic outcomes of preschool children. Science, 333, 964–967.
Dickinson, D. K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2010). Speaking out for language: Why language is central to reading development. Educational Researcher, 39(4), 305–310.
Dickinson, D. K., McCabe, A., & Sprague, K. (2003). Teacher rating of oral language literacy (TROLL): Individualizing early literacy instruction with a standards-based rating tool. The Reading Teacher, 56(6), 554–564.
Dickinson, D. K. & Porche, M. (2011). Relation between language experiences in preschool classrooms and children’s kindergarten and fourth-grade language and reading abilities. Child Development, 82(3), 870–886.
Echevarría, J., Short, D., & Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 195–210.
69
Ellis, R. (1985). Teacher-pupil interaction in second language development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 69–85). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Escamilla, K., & Hopewell, S. (2010). Transitions to biliteracy: Creating positive academic trajectories for emerging bilinguals in the United States. In J. E. Petrovic (Ed.), International perspectives on bilingual education: Policy, practice, controversy (pp. 69–94). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Fillmore, L. W., & Snow, C. E. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In C. T. Adger, C. E. Snow, & D. Christian (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7–53). Washington, DC, and McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
Francis, D. J., Lesaux, N., Kieffer, M., & Rivera, H. (2006). Practical guidelines for the education of English language learners: Research-based recommendations for instruction and academic interventions. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Corporation, Center on Instruction.
García, O., & Kleifgen, J. (2010). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English language learners. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gee, J. P. (2008). What is academic language? In A. S. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students’ strengths (pp. 57–70). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
Gibbons, P. (2008). English learners academic literacy and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Goldenberg, C. & Coleman, R. (2010). Promoting academic achievement among English learners: A guide to the research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
González, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gottlieb, M. (2012). An overview of language education standards. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, S. Stoynoff & B. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment (pp. 74–81). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Hakuta, K., Goto Butler, Y., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? (Policy Report No. 2001-1). Santa Barbara, CA: UC Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. F. Christie (Ed.), Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Hornberger, N. H. (2003). Introduction. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings (xii–xxii). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
70
Mohan, B. (1986). Language and content (Vol. 5288). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). www.naeyc.org
National Education Goals Panel (NEGP). www.govinfo.library.unt.edu/negp/
Office of Head Start, (2010). The head start child development and early learning framework. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.
Pérez, B. (Ed.). (2004). Sociocultural contexts of language and literacy (2nd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Resnick, L. & Snow, C. (2009). Speaking and listening for preschool through third grade, (Revised Ed.) Washington, DC: New Standards, University of Pittsburg and the National Center on Education and the Economy.
Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework (Tech. Rep. No. 2003-1). Santa Barbara, CA: UC Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Scott-Little, C., Kagan, S. L. & Frelow, V. S. (2005). Inside the content: The breadth and depth of early learning standards. Research report. Greensboro, NC: SERVE Center, University of North Carolina.
Short, D. J., Echevarría, J., & Richards-Tutor, C. (2011). Research on academic literacy development in sheltered instruction classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 15, 363–380.
Snow, C. E., & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 112–133). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence, University of California–Santa Cruz.
Ulibarri, D. M., Spencer, M. L., & Rivas, G. A. (1981). Language proficiency and academic achievement: A study of language proficiency tests and their relationship to school ratings as predictors of academic achievement. NABE Journal, 5, 47–79.
Valdés, G. (2001). Learning and not learning English: Latino students in American schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walqui, A. (2003). Conceptual framework: Scaffolding for English learners. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
Zwiers, J. (2008). Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms, grades 5–12. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.