The Dynamics of Inequality of Educational Opportunity in ...1 The Dynamics of Inequality of...
Transcript of The Dynamics of Inequality of Educational Opportunity in ...1 The Dynamics of Inequality of...
ISA Research Committee on Social Stratification and Mobility (RC28)
Neuchâtel Conference, Switzerland, 7-9 May 2004
The Dynamics of Inequality of Educational Opportunity in France:
Change in the Association Between Social Background and Education
in Thirteen Five-Year Birth Cohorts (1908-1972)
Louis-André Vallet, National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), France
Quantitative Sociology Laboratory, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics (CREST), Timbre J350, 3 avenue Pierre Larousse, 92245 Malakoff Cedex, France
[email protected] or [email protected]
- Last revision 26 April 2004 -
1
The Dynamics of Inequality of Educational Opportunity in France:
Change in the Association Between Social Background and Education
in Thirteen Five-Year Birth Cohorts (1908-1972)1
1 I warmly thank Claude Thélot with whom I worked in a preliminary collaborative project on
that topic. Earlier versions of this article were presented at the European Science Foundation
conference “Educational Differentiation in European Societies: Causes and Consequences”
(Giens, France, September 16-21, 2000), at the meeting of the Social Stratification Research
Committee (RC 28) in the XV ISA World Congress of Sociology (Brisbane, Australia, July 7-
13, 2002) and at the methodological conference of the research network on Changing
Economy, Unequal Life-Chances and Quality of Life (Nuffield College, Oxford, September
25-27, 2003). I thank Hanna Ayalon, Richard Breen, Robert Erikson, Adam Gamoran, Harry
Ganzeboom, Anthony Heath, Walter Müller and Yossi Shavit for stimulating and helpful
comments. Special thanks are due to John Goldthorpe and Mike Hout who independently
suggested investigating the link between the two-way contingency table approach and the
educational transition approach on an empirical basis.
2
Abstract: Despite the educational expansion in industrialized societies, the association
between social origin of adult men and women and the highest degree they got is generally
considered highly stable over time. However, that “persistent inequality” conclusion has been
challenged more recently for a few countries by using powerful log-multiplicative statistical
techniques. This study addresses the issue of social class inequalities in educational
attainment for France from early twentieth century. Based on data from seven nationally
representative surveys (N circa 240,000 cases), the analysis uses the log-multiplicative layer
effect model in full interaction and the more recent Goodman-Hout regression-type model
(Sociological Methodology 1998). In French society the association between social origin and
education has undergone a decline among cohorts born from early twentieth century. This
change has been more marked for women than for men and has mainly occurred among
cohorts born from the mid-thirties to the early fifties. As regards temporal dynamics, this
study therefore confirms and extends previous research published in France by Prost (1986)
and in the US by Smith and Garnier (1986). The results also show that, until cohorts born in
the mid-thirties, the level of association between social origin and education was distinctly
stronger for women than for men. Studying the sensitivity of estimated trends to use of
various indicators of social background suggests that cultural inequalities in education are
more resistant to change than socioeconomic inequalities. Finally, investigating the link
between the two-way contingency table approach and the educational transition approach,
this article demonstrates on an empirical basis that the general downward trend in origin –
education association is compatible with remarkably stable, or even increasing social origin
effects in transitions associated with advanced stages of the educational system, but is
generated by the consequences of declining origin effects in the most basic transitions.
3
The dynamics of socioeconomic inequality of educational opportunities in industrial or post-
industrial societies is a research question with a long-standing interest in sociology which has
been studied using various quantitative approaches. It is indeed worth emphasizing that its
statistical methodologies have been strongly reshaped over the last three decades. Till the
end of the 1970s the linear regression model of educational attainment was the unique
approach. Using a metric dependent variable to measure the final amount of schooling, the
first period answered the following research question: what has been the change over time in
the effect of social origin variables on the mean number of school years completed? The
empirical evidence was somewhat mixed. Reporting regressions of highest grade of school
completed on father’s occupation, parental income, father’s and mother’s schooling and
three other control variables for American white males born between 1907 and 1951, Mare
(1981) described little change in the educational attainment process: only the effect of
father’s occupational socioeconomic index had declined slightly from early cohorts to more
recent ones. More generally, summarizing the results of a comparative project on thirteen
countries, Shavit and Blossfeld (1993, p. 16) concluded that the effect of father’s education
declined over time in five countries and remained unchanged in the others (except for a
country where the effect first declined then increased), and that the effect of father’s
occupation remained unchanged in nine countries, declined in three and increased in one.
However, as emphasized by Treiman and Ganzeboom (2000), in six of the eight nations for
which linear regressions were reported cohort by cohort, a downward trend was apparent in
the proportion of variance explained by background variables, thereby suggesting a historical
decline in the dependence of educational attainment on social origins.
The second period of educational stratification research began with the proposal of the
sequential logistic regression model of educational transitions (Mare 1980). Decomposing
the intrinsically discrete and sequential nature of an educational career in a series of
successive branching points – an idea also outlined by Boudon (1974) – this model assesses
the net effect of social background variables on the odds of “surviving” each specific
4
transition. With this model it has widely been observed that social origin effects decline
steadily from the earliest school transitions to the latest (Müller and Karle 1993; Shavit and
Blossfeld 1993; Rijken 1999). This result has often been attributed to a process of differential
selection: from the earliest to the latest school transitions, differential dropout rates
systematically reduce heterogeneity between children from different social origins on
unmeasured determinants of school continuation such as ability or motivation (Mare 1981, p.
82), and because of the correlation between these variables and social origins greater
homogeneity on unmeasured factors at higher levels of schooling reduces the effects of
observed social background variables.2 According to a related argument, as educational
expansion increases the proportion of the total population at risk at a given transition, its
heterogeneity on unmeasured determinants of school continuation grows and, as a
consequence, the effects of social background variables on the odds of surviving that
transition are likely to increase. However, as regards change over time, the empirical
evidence was rather mixed. In the aforementioned comparative project, only two out of
thirteen countries (the Netherlands and Sweden) experienced a decline in social origin
effects for transitions within secondary education. In the remaining countries, contrasts
between men and women from different social backgrounds were fairly stable over birth
cohorts for each transition, thus leading the editors to a general “persistent inequality”
2 However, more recent research which analyzed data on American cohorts who
experienced an environment of contracting public support for higher education has cast
some doubt on the selective attrition explanation (Lucas 1996). After a more advanced
discussion of the incidence of unobserved heterogeneity on modeling school continuation
decisions (Mare 1993), research by economists has also strongly criticized the dynamic
selection bias faced by the sequential logit model of educational transitions and, more
generally, has questioned the usefulness of this model (Cameron and Heckman 1998); see,
however, the vigorous response by Lucas (2001, pp. 1653-62).
5
conclusion (Shavit and Blossfeld 1993).3 However, another cross-national and over-time
comparison based on a large-scale data set found both declining social inequalities over
cohorts in school continuation probabilities and an offsetting effect caused by an increase in
the percentage of students at risk which enhances the effects of father’s occupation (Rijken
1999). A suggestive conclusion of the latter study therefore is that the “persistent inequality”
conclusion emphasized by Shavit and Blossfeld would in fact be produced by the
combination of two contradictory trends.
As regards temporal change in inequality of educational opportunity, the linear regression
model of highest educational level attained and the sequential logistic regression model of
educational transitions may tell us different, albeit reconcilable stories. While the latter is only
sensitive to the relative allocation of schooling between social groups, the former is also
affected by the marginal distribution of schooling and change in it, notably increased average
educational level as a consequence of educational expansion (Mare 1981). For instance, for
American white males born between 1907 and 1951, quasi-stable linear effects of parental
socioeconomic characteristics on highest grade attained were produced by the combination
of inter-cohort increases in school continuation rates (which by themselves imply declining
background effects on educational attainment) and increasing social origin effects over time
on the odds of surviving some educational transitions. Conversely, in the Philippines, Smith
and Cheung (1986) demonstrated both declining social background effects in the linear
model of educational attainment and stable background effects on each of the educational
transitions. It might thus been said that, while the linear model provides a general picture of
temporal change in the dependence of educational attainment on social origins (De Graaf
and Ganzeboom 1993), the sequential logistic regression model yields a more structural or
3 More recently, a reanalysis of Italian data nonetheless revealed declining effects of father’s
education on the odds of completing the lower levels of the educational hierarchy (Shavit and
Westerbeek 1998).
6
“pure” measure of inequality of educational opportunity as it is unaffected by historical
change in the marginal distribution of schooling (Mare 1993). This provides an understanding
of its impressive centrality in comparative educational stratification research over the last two
decades which also comes from the fact that the discrete model corresponds to the way
persons accumulate formal schooling, namely, in a sequence of irreversible steps.
In our view and despite its intrinsic interest, the classical model of educational transitions
nonetheless encounters two limitations. Firstly, it assumes that individuals progress through
the educational system in a unilinear sequential mode whereas many school systems –
notably those of European societies – contain parallel branches of study that are most
fruitfully seen as qualitatively different alternative pathways with different probabilities of
school continuation attached to them. Within the Mare model it is therefore difficult to take
account of possibly existing second-order differences such as the decision between
vocational studies and academic studies within secondary education and this feature recently
led Breen and Jonsson (2000) to propose a multinomial transition model. Secondly, as it
closely parallels the continuation decision process along the educational career, the
sequential model of educational transitions provides us with local “pure” measures of social
origin effects, i.e. measures which are specific for each transition examined. But the
sequential model leaves the following question entirely unanswered: if, in a given country,
social origin effects decline over birth cohorts for some transitions, but remain stable or even
increase for some others, what is the final outcome as regards temporal dynamics in the
intrinsic association between highest educational level attained and social origins in that
country? Such a question may be answered using a statistical technique which is less
frequent in educational stratification studies, namely log-linear and log-multiplicative
modeling of a detailed three-way contingency table cross-classifying birth cohort, social
origins and highest educational level attained. Such an approach does not afford a
multivariate perspective able to separate the effects of multiple social background
determinants of educational attainment. As regards its micro-sociological foundations, a
7
drawback of what we can call the contingency table approach to educational stratification
certainly is that it implicitly (and rather implausibly) assumes that the decision of how much
education to acquire is taken at the outset of the individual’s educational career (Breen and
Jonsson 2000). However, as a tool to discover what has occurred in society, this
methodological approach has certainly been revitalized over recent years, especially
because progress in log-multiplicative modeling – the “Unidiff” or log-multiplicative layer
effect model (Erikson and Goldthorpe 1992; Xie 1992) – now offers considerable statistical
power to discern even slow historical trends which would have gone undetected otherwise.
For instance, using this technique led Jonsson, Mills and Müller (1996) to demonstrate a
trend toward equalization in West Germany and to challenge the “persistent inequality”
conclusion previously reached for this country in the Shavit and Blossfeld’s comparative
project. Finally, a more flexible and more general log-multiplicative model has been recently
proposed to analyse how the association between two variables depends on a third variable
(Goodman and Hout 1998, 2001). It is likely that this model can be useful in comparative
educational stratification research and will prove a sensible instrument to trace change in
strength and pattern of association between social origins and highest qualification attained
over birth cohorts.
Following the same statistical approach, the aim of this paper is therefore to investigate
temporal dynamics in the association between social background and education in France
over thirteen five-year birth cohorts (1908-1972). As France was not represented among the
thirteen countries studied in Shavit and Blossfeld’s comparative project, we begin by briefly
reviewing existing literature on temporal trends in inequality of educational opportunity in
French society, then we detail the statistical models we will use paying special attention to
the most recent one, namely the Goodman and Hout’s regression-type model which will
prove able to fit French data remarkably well. Finally, after a presentation of the surveys and
variables we use, the empirical section will be devoted to an examination of the following
questions:
8
(i) to what extent does it exist a trend over time toward decreasing association between
social origins and educational destination in France and does its magnitude differ between
men and women as it has been observed in Sweden (Jonsson, Mills and Müller 1996)?
(ii) as regards temporal dynamics in inequality of educational opportunity in France, how can
we conciliate results provided by the contingency table approach with those yielded by the
sequential model of educational transitions? more specifically, is change in inequality of
educational opportunity in France compatible with the “maximally maintained inequality”
hypothesis (Hout, Raftery and Bell 1993) according to which the effects of social origin on
educational destination only decline at those levels of the educational system for which the
attendance rates of the privileged classes are saturated?
(iii) to what extent does the magnitude of the declining trend in inequality of educational
opportunity in France depend on the variable used for social background as it has been
observed in the Netherlands where the effect of father’s education has proved more resistant
to change than the effect of father’s occupation (De Graaf and Ganzeboom 1993)?
(iv) how much difference does the reduction in inequality of educational opportunity in France
make, i.e. how many children from the non privileged classes in the youngest (1968-1972)
birth cohort possess high educational qualifications which they would not have held if the
association between social origin and educational destination had remained the same as it
was in the oldest (1908-1912) birth cohort?
Previous research on temporal trends in inequality of educational opportunity in
France
Previous research which investigated the dynamics of inequality of educational opportunity in
France followed the three aforementioned statistical approaches and analyzed one or
several of the Formation-Qualification Professionnelle (FQP) surveys, a series of nationally
representative surveys conducted by the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic
Surveys (INSEE).
9
Using data from the 1977, 1985 and 1993 FQP surveys in order to distinguish between six
birth cohorts, Duru-Bellat and Kieffer (2000) estimated linear regression models of
educational attainment on five explanatory variables: father’s and mother’s socioeconomic
group, father’s and mother’s highest diploma and gender. A shortcoming of the analysis is
that the dependent variable is not measured as the actual number of years of education, but
on a somewhat arbitrary interval-level scale ranging from 1 for “without any diploma” to 7 for
“tertiary education diploma”. The results nonetheless clearly demonstrate a steady fall in the
explanatory power of the background variables: R2 decreases from 32.3% for men and
women born before 1939 to 20.3% for the most recent (1964-1973) birth cohort. However,
the decrease in the dependence of highest educational level attained on background
variables only applies to the effect of father’s and mother’s education while the effect of their
socioeconomic group remains much more stable over time.
Brauns (1998) applied the sequential logistic regression model of educational transitions to
French data from the 1985 FQP survey and highlighted a complex picture of educational
inequalities over the various levels of the educational system. As regards admission to
secondary school, she found significantly declining class effects mainly from the 1945-1949
birth cohort for children of farmers as well as skilled and unskilled manual workers. The
enlargement of access to secondary education which strongly accelerated from the early
1950s however resulted in an opposite change for the next transition: in the 1955-1959,
1960-1964 and 1965-1968 birth cohorts the odds of completing lower secondary education
worsened for children of skilled and unskilled manual workers who entered secondary school
as compared to corresponding odds for upper service class children.4 From completion of
lower secondary education to completion of upper secondary education, decreasing
inequality of educational opportunity again characterized skilled manual workers from the
1925-1934 birth cohort as well as non manual employees and the lower service class from
4 The same result was also found in independent analyses by Duru-Bellat and Kieffer (2000).
10
the 1935-1944 birth cohort. No trend at all was apparent as regards the last transitions
(completion of lower, respectively intermediate or upper, tertiary education). Estimating also
unconditional logit models for completion of each educational level, Brauns (1998, 1999)
finally demonstrated that declining class inequalities for admission to secondary education
also resulted in similar effects for completion of lower and upper secondary education as well
as lower and intermediate tertiary education.
It is worth emphasizing that these results are therefore somewhat at odds with a widely cited
paper by Garnier and Raffalovich (1984) whose conclusion stressed little change in the
pattern of association between social origins and educational certification in France. Using
the 1970 FQP survey to distinguish between six ten-year birth cohorts, five categories of
father’s occupation and seven educational categories (from “no degree at all” to “a university
degree”), the authors constructed a series of hierarchical log-linear models estimating the
odds of having obtained each degree versus all others as a function of father’s occupation
and cohort. After taking account of marginal shifts in the distributions of occupations and
diplomas over cohorts, they found that the constant association model was able to reproduce
the observed data rather faithfully and concluded that “the educational expansion that has
taken place over the twentieth century has not enormously altered differential access to
education based on social origins, except for sons of farmers and for women” (Garnier and
Raffalovich 1984, p. 9).
However, Smith and Garnier (1986) questioned the appropriateness of this analysis in a
subsequent but less widely cited paper.5 Recognizing that moving directly from the constant
association model to the saturated model has strong drawbacks, they argued that it is much
5 For instance, in their comparative project, Shavit and Blossfeld (1993, p. 4) commented on
Garnier and Raffalovich (1984) but did not introduce any reference to Smith and Garnier
(1986).
11
more preferable to assess trends with intermediate models that do not require constant
association across cohorts, but that stop short of using all available degrees of freedom. The
authors thus applied Goodman’s log-multiplicative association model to the 1970 French
data for men and women born between 1920 and 1949 and demonstrated “a notable decline
among cohorts born in the 1940s in the strong association between father’s occupation and
highest degree obtained, and few sex differences in the trend in this association” (Smith and
Garnier 1986, p. 339).
Goux and Maurin (1995) also used hierarchical log-linear modeling on French data for young
people aged 25 to 34 in the 1970, 1977, 1985 and 1993 surveys as well as for men and
women aged 25 to 64 in the 1993 survey. However, following Garnier and Raffalovich’s
strategy, they also moved directly from the constant association model to the saturated one.
After an examination of three-way interaction parameters (social origin x educational
destination x survey (or birth cohort)), their conclusion which, for reasons underlined above,
may suffer from lack of statistical power was that no firm trend has existed toward increasing
or decreasing inequality of educational opportunity in French society.
Before concluding this review, it must be stressed that Smith and Garnier’s findings fit well
with French studies in history of education. Investigating all secondary schools in the Orléans
area, Prost (1986, 1990, 1992) systematically examined the transformations in the social
recruitment of pupils between 1945 and 1980 at various levels of the educational system.
According to his analysis, a process of democratization has been in train since the mid-
1940s. However, Prost also concluded that educational reforms introduced between the end
of the 1950s and the mid-1960s to provide children from all social backgrounds with
increased education and to promote equality of educational opportunity have paradoxically
introduced additional rigidities which have impeded the ongoing process of democratization.
In the following sections, we therefore aim to replicate and extend Smith and Garnier’s
12
analysis by applying recent progress in log-multiplicative contingency table analysis to
French data.
Statistical modeling
Let c be one of the examined birth cohorts (out of NC), o and o’ two different social origins
(out of NO), e and e’ two different educational destinations (out of NE) and odc the odds ratio
which measures, in birth cohort c, the intrinsic strength of the statistical association between
these social origins and these educational destinations:
)()()()()(elyalternativor '''''''
'ecocoeceooecc
ceoeco
coeoecc mLogmLogmLogmLogodLog
mmmm
od −−+==
We can analyze the contingency table cross-classifying social origin (O), educational
destination (E) and cohort (C) by means of four log-linear or log-multiplicative nested models.
Null association model (1)
λλλλλλ EC
ec
OC
oc
C
c
E
e
O
ooecmLog +++++=)(
Estimated with NC(NO-1)(NE-1) degrees of freedom, Model 1 implies that 0)( =codLog or
1=cod . Assuming that social origin and educational destination are independent in each
birth cohort, it expresses the hypothesis of complete equality of educational opportunity and
provides us with a reference for assessing the extent to which more realistic models fit the
data more closely.
Constant association model (2)
λλλλλλλ OE
oe
EC
ec
OC
oc
C
c
E
e
O
ooecmLog ++++++=)(
Estimated with (NO-1)(NE-1)(NC-1) degrees of freedom, Model 2 implies:
λλλλOE
eo
OE
oe
OE
eo
OE
oecodLog''''
)( −−+=
13
Assuming that all the odds ratios which measure the association between social origin and
educational destination are constant over birth cohorts, Model 2 expresses the hypothesis of
constant inequality of educational opportunity.
‘Multiplicative uniform cohort effect’ association model (3)
ψβλλλλλλ oec
EC
ec
OC
oc
C
c
E
e
O
ooecmLog ++++++=)(
Proposed by Xie (1992) and Erikson and Goldthorpe (1992), Model 3 is estimated with
(NO.NE-NO-NE)(NC-1) degrees of freedom and implies:
)()(''''
ψψψψβeooeeooeccodLog −−+=
Decomposing the origin – education association and its variation over birth cohorts as the
product of a common pattern (the ψoe
parameters) and a cohort-specific parameter (βc),
Model 3 is able to detect differences over cohorts in strength of association, i.e. in the
general level of inequality of educational opportunity. More precisely, assuming that β1 is
set at 1, estimating βc as less than 1 (respectively more than 1) for a subsequent cohort will
correspond to all estimated logged odds ratios moving towards 0 (respectively away from 0),
i.e. will correspond to the association becoming weaker (respectively stronger) than in the
first cohort. As it assumes that all odds ratios are moving in the same direction from one
cohort to another and expresses this variation with only one parameter, Model 3 is very
powerful to detect a dominant trend in the data but may be also rather crude to accurately
describe the change that occurs.
‘Regression-type cohort effect’ association model (4)
ϕγλλλλλλλ oec
OE
oe
EC
ec
OC
oc
C
c
E
e
O
ooecmLog +++++++=)(
Proposed by Goodman and Hout (1998, 2001) and estimated with (NO.NE-NO-NE)(NC-2)
degrees of freedom, Model 4 implies:
14
)()()('''''''' ϕϕϕϕγλλλλ eooeeooec
OE
eo
OE
oe
OE
eo
OE
oecodLog −−++−−+=
While the λOE
oe parameters establish the baseline (stable over birth cohorts) pattern of
association between social origin and educational destination, the ϕoe
parameters represent
the part of the association which varies over birth cohorts and the magnitude of the γc
parameter determines the strength of the adjustment of the association for cohort c. As a
consequence, Model 4 is able to detect differences over cohorts in both pattern and strength
of association. More precisely, examination of the ϕoe
parameters will allow us to highlight
the combined social origins and educational destinations for which change over cohorts has
been the most pronounced while examination of the γc parameters will demonstrate which
birth cohorts have been most affected by change in the association between social origin and
education. Without any loss of generality we will use the following identifying constraints:
0and1,0NC1
====== ∑∑∑∑ γγϕϕλλe
oeo
oee
OE
oeo
OE
oe
so that the λOE
oe parameters will represent the pattern of association in the last (youngest)
birth cohort and the ϕoe
parameters will represent the pattern of deviation characteristic of
the first (oldest) birth cohort as compared to the last one.6
Data and variables
To analyze change in the association between social origin and educational destination in
20th-century France over a large number of cohorts and with sufficient statistical power we
use a series of seven nationally representative surveys conducted by INSEE, namely the
1964, 1970, 1977, 1985 and 1993 Formation-Qualification Professionnelle (FQP) surveys
6 For estimation purposes we use the LEM software (version 1.0) developed by Jeroen K.
Vermunt (University of Tilburg, The Netherlands).
15
and the 1993 and 1997 Emploi surveys. Taking characteristics of the surveys into account
and restricting the analysis to French-born men and women aged at least 25 with information
available on their father’s occupation at the time they ceased attending school or university
on a regular basis,7 we can assess the association between social origin and educational
destination in nearly fifty two-way contingency tables which correspond to thirteen five-year
birth cohorts from 1908-1912 to 1968-1972 (Table 1). The total sample size is 240,367 cases
(or 244,591 cases if the first two cohorts in the 1970 survey are included).
Preliminary analyses which investigated differences in one-way margins and two-way
association between contingency tables corresponding to the same cohort did not detect
important and systematic departures from homogeneity across surveys. Most of the analysis
will therefore combine the surveys to consolidate all tables for the same cohort and will finally
use thirteen cohort-specific tables cross-classifying social origin and educational destination.
In that case, the sample size in the 1908-1912 birth cohort is 1,273 cases (or 3,577
depending on treatment of the 1970 survey). It amounts to 11,063 cases in the 1968-1972
birth cohort and 36,118 in the most numerous one, namely the 1948-1952 birth cohort.
Robustness of results will however be assessed by supplementary analyses investigating
either each survey separately or the whole set of basic contingency tables.
We define social origin as an eight-category variable on the basis of father’s occupation: (1)
farmers and smallholders; (2) artisans and shopkeepers; (3) higher-grade professionals and
managers; (4) teachers (in primary, secondary or tertiary education) and assimilated
7 If the father was unknown or deceased at that time, his occupation was replaced by
mother’s or guardian’s occupation in the Emploi surveys. In the 1964 FQP survey father’s
occupation was only asked to men and women born after 1917. In the 1970 FQP survey
educational qualifications were differently and less accurately collected among people born
before 1918 than among the youngest.
16
occupations; (5) lower-grade professionals and technicians; (6) routine non manual workers;
(7) foremen and skilled manual workers; (8) agricultural and unskilled manual workers.
Figure 1 shows how the relative importance of the various social origins has evolved in
France from the early decades of the twentieth century. Children of farmers and smallholders
experienced the most dramatic change, falling from nearly one third in the 1908-1912 birth
cohort to less than 6% in the 1968-1972 cohort. On the other hand the decrease was rather
limited for the offspring of the self-employed petty bourgeoisie (artisans and shopkeepers).
While the proportion of men and women originating from the agricultural and unskilled
working class remained more or less stable until the 1948-1952 birth cohort, it has declined
in the subsequent ones. Conversely, an almost continuous increase characterized the skilled
fraction of the working class so that one out of four men and women in the last cohort is the
child of a foreman or skilled manual worker. Finally, the growth of occupations in the tertiary
sector resulted in steadily expanding non manual classes: higher-grade professionals and
managers (from 7% to 11%), teachers and assimilated occupations (from 1% to 4%), lower-
grade professionals and technicians (from 2% to 10%) and routine non manual workers (from
9% to 16%).
We define educational destination as a seven-category variable on the basis of highest
degree obtained8: (1) no diploma (or no information); (2) primary education certificate
(Certificat d’Études Primaires); (3) lower secondary education diploma (without vocational
qualification) (Brevet élémentaire, BEPC); (4) lower vocational education diploma (Certificat
d’Aptitude Professionnelle, Examen de Fin d’Apprentissage Artisanal); (5) upper secondary
or technical education diploma (Baccalauréat or assimilated diploma); (6) lower tertiary
8 In the 1970, 1977, 1985 and 1993 FQP surveys we only consider degrees obtained in initial
schooling including apprenticeship, i.e. without taking post-school training or in-service
training into account. Unfortunately, a similar distinction between initial and further schooling
cannot be implemented in the 1964 FQP survey, nor in the 1993 and 1997 Emploi surveys.
17
education degree (one or two years after Baccalauréat); (7) upper tertiary education degree
(at least three years after Baccalauréat). Over more than sixty years educational expansion
has been dramatic in French society (Figure 2). A majority of men and women in the 1908-
1912 birth cohort did not possess any diploma and a further third held no more than a
primary education certificate, but corresponding percentages in the 1968-1972 birth cohort
were respectively 15% and 1%. While elementary qualification virtually disappeared over the
period, it is noticeable that the decrease in the proportion of men and women without any
qualification leveled off from the 1943-1947 cohort. The expansion of lower vocational
education was tremendous after the 1923-1927 birth cohort: the incumbents of such a
diploma reached a peak at 34% of the 1963-1967 generation, then declined rather sharply in
the very last birth cohort. Conversely, lower secondary education diplomas never exceeded
10% of a generation. But the most clear consequence of educational expansion has
expressed itself in a continuous rise in the relative size of advanced qualifications, either
incumbents of Baccalauréat-level diplomas (from 3% to 18%) or incumbents of post-
Baccalauréat diplomas (from 1% to 16% for degrees involving one or two further years of
education and from 2% to 16% for University or Grandes Écoles degrees).
In the first 1908-1912, the median 1938-1942 and the last 1968-1972 birth cohort,
educational destination strongly depends on social origin, and in essentially the same way
(Table 2). For instance, in each generation, men and women with origins in the “teachers
and assimilated occupations” category were the most advantaged, as indicated by the
percentage of those who reached a lower or upper tertiary degree. Using the same criterion,
children of higher-grade professionals and managers, then children of lower-grade
professionals and technicians were the second and third groups in each generation again.
Conversely, children of farmers and smallholders and children of agricultural and unskilled
manual workers were equally disadvantaged in the 1908-1912 birth cohort: the percentage
distributions were very close and in each case about two thirds did not get any diploma. In
the 1938-1942 birth cohort the offspring of the two social groups were again rather close and
18
still appeared to be the most disadvantaged considering their educational qualifications. But
children of farmers and smallholders strongly improved their relative position between the
1938-1942 and 1968-1972 cohorts. At the end of the period their educational destinations
were considerably more favorable than those of children of agricultural and unskilled manual
workers. They were also clearly better than those of children of foremen and skilled manual
workers and slightly better than those of routine non manual workers. The examination of
simple row percentages therefore suggests that despite strong inertia in the association
between social origin and educational destination in France some change has occurred from
the early decades of the twentieth century in which children of farmers and smallholders
played a significant part.
An empirical analysis of the dynamics of inequality of educational opportunity in
France
In order to analyze change in statistical association net of educational expansion and
marginal shifts in the distribution of social origins we apply the aforementioned log-linear and
log-multiplicative models to the three-way contingency table cross-classifying social origin (8
categories), educational destination (7 categories) and birth cohort (13 categories) (Table 3).
Beginning our analysis with the whole sample of all men and women (first panel), the
constant association model which imposes cohort invariance on all the odds ratios in the
origin – education table appears to have strong potential for describing French society over
thirteen five-year birth cohorts. Although it is rejected by a conventional statistical test as a
consequence of the extremely large sample size, this model has to be preferred to the
saturated model on the basis of the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) statistic, it
misclassifies only 4.1% of the total sample involved and eliminates 91.8% of the distance
which separates the data from the baseline model – that of statistical independence in each
cohort.
19
However, the ‘multiplicative uniform cohort effect’ association model which estimates twelve
supplementary parameters improves on the constant association model very significantly9
and is, according to the BIC statistic, also preferable to the latter. It may thus be concluded
that significant variations occurred over birth cohorts in the general strength of the origin –
education association. Finally, the ‘multiplicative uniform cohort effect’ association model is
superseded by the ‘regression-type cohort effect’ association model which affords the best fit
as indicated by the likelihood-ratio chi-square and BIC statistics. The latter model indeed fits
the data remarkably well as it misclassifies only 1.7% of the total sample involved and
eliminates 98.4% of the distance between the data and the null association hypothesis. It
must therefore be concluded that significant variations occurred over birth cohorts not only in
strength, but also in pattern of association between social origin and educational destination.
The third and fourth panels of Table 3 separately replicate the same analysis with similar
results on the male and female samples. Finally, as the previous section strongly suggests
that children of farmers and smallholders played a prominent part in changing origin –
education association, the second panel again applies the same models to the whole
sample while ignoring this social group in the analysis (using structural zeros). The constant
association model fits better than in the general analysis, but the ‘multiplicative uniform
cohort effect’ association model significantly improves on it again and the ‘regression-type
cohort effect’ association model still proves to be the best-fitting model. The second panel
therefore demonstrates that the dynamics of origin – education association did not only result
from change in the relative position of the offspring of farmers10. We go on with the analysis
9 The difference in the likelihood-ratio chi-square statistic is 665.7 for 12 degrees of freedom.
10 On the basis of the G2 statistics displayed in the first and second panels, it is possible to
compute the part of total lack of fit of any model which is attributable to children of farmers
and smallholders: 62.2% for the constant association and ‘multiplicative uniform cohort effect’
association models, but only 12.8% for the null association model and 27.1% for the
‘regression-type cohort effect’ association model.
20
by considering parameters which depict the extent of change under the simplest log-
multiplicative model, then we will examine parameters from the more complex ‘regression-
type cohort effect’ association model.
Change in the general strength of association between social origin and educational
destination
Figure 3 highlights the downward trend in inequality of educational opportunity in France,
estimated assuming a stable pattern of association. Fixed at 1 in the 1908-1912 cohort, the
log-multiplicative parameter is estimated at 1.123 in the next one, then decreases until 0.648
in the 1968-1972 cohort, thereby demonstrating a fall of more than 35% in the logged odds
ratios. While it is nearly monotonic, the downward trend cannot be accurately summarized
with a linear trend as a substantial part of the change occurred between the 1933-1937 and
1948-1952 birth cohorts, i.e. for generations who could enter secondary school before the
major educational reforms (Prost 1990). Change largely leveled off in the three subsequent
birth cohorts characterized by post-reform secondary school system, but took off again in the
very last cohort. After omitting children of farmers and smallholders in the analysis, a mainly
similar dynamics reappears though on a reduced scale as the parameter declines from 1.061
in the 1913-1917 cohort to 0.716 in the last one. This simultaneously demonstrates that the
improvement of educational opportunities among sons and daughters of farmers played a
significant part in accentuating the equalization trend but was not the only factor in creating
it.11
When it is separately applied to the seven surveys the ‘multiplicative uniform cohort effect’
association model significantly improves on the constant association model in each case and
Figure 4 displays the estimated log-multiplicative parameters. The 1970, 1977 and 1985
11 The same result has already been documented for Germany and Sweden (Jonsson, Mills
and Müller 1996, pp. 194-5).
21
FQP surveys are remarkably consistent in demonstrating a sustained trend toward
equalization between the 1933-1937 and 1938-1942 birth cohorts. This both confirms Smith
and Garnier’s previous findings and Prost’s historical study according to which a reform
promulgated in 1941 by the conservative Minister of Education Jérôme Carcopino to
integrate the Écoles Primaires Supérieures in the secondary school system had positive
effects and resulted in declining inequality of educational opportunity. Despite some
irregularities, notably for the last birth cohorts in the 1993 FQP survey, the survey-specific
analysis replicates the downward trend demonstrated in the pooled data set. This is also the
same when the ‘multiplicative uniform cohort effect’ association model is simultaneously
estimated on the whole set of basic contingency tables (Figure 5), though some variance is
especially visible in the 1918-1922 to 1933-1937 birth cohorts.12
Comparison between males and females in strength and trend of origin – education
association
Research on Swedish data which applied the same statistical technique demonstrated an
equalization trend for both males and females and produced consistent results regarding
strength of association across the gender variable: Jonsson, Mills and Müller (1996, p. 194)
observed that “amongst the oldest cohorts in Sweden, class differences are greater for
females than for males, but amongst the youngest cohorts this is reversed and class
differences are stronger for men” and Jonsson and Erikson (2000, p. 371) concluded that “for
women the association between social origin and attainment of upper secondary and
university education were somewhat stronger than for men in older cohorts”. Figure 6
12 Research which investigated measurement error in social class variables concluded that
reliability is rather low for reports of class origin for older respondents (Breen and Jonsson
1997). This may provide a partial explanation for the variance in the 1918-1922, 1923-1927
and 1928-1932 birth cohorts as the estimates for the 1985 FQP survey (which, according to
Table 1, comprises the oldest respondents in each of these cohorts) are outliers.
22
investigates the same research question for France by applying the ‘multiplicative uniform
cohort effect’ association model to a set of 26, i.e. 2 sexes x 13 cohorts, contingency tables,
assuming a common pattern of association and fixing the log-multiplicative parameter at 1 for
males in the first birth cohort.
For both males and females, the estimates clearly show a downward trend in strength of
association between social origin and educational destination, but the equalization trend is
more marked among women. This corresponds to the level of association being distinctly
stronger for women than for men until cohorts born in the mid-1930s. Then the difference
progressively disappears and it is even reversed in the 1968-1972 cohort. An examination of
observed data confirms the latter result: for instance, the odds of getting an upper tertiary
education degree rather than no diploma are 71.4 times higher for daughters of teachers
born around 1970 than for daughters of agricultural and unskilled manual workers, but the
same odds ratio amounts to 129.0 for sons. Finally, sex-specific analyses also confirm the
more pronounced equalization trend among women as the log-multiplicative parameter fixed
at 1 in the first birth cohort peaks at 1.196 in the next one, then declines till 0.647 in the last
one while corresponding estimates for men are respectively 0.978 and 0.608.
Reconciling results from the contingency table approach with the educational transition
approach and investigating the “maximally maintained inequality” hypothesis
The key proposition in this hypothesis states that “transition rates and odds ratios between
social origins and educational transitions remain the same from one cohort to another unless
forced to change by increasing enrollments” (Hout, Raftery and Bell 1993, p. 25). More
specifically, “if demand for a given level of education is saturated for the upper classes, that
is, if some origin-specific transition rates approach or reach 100%, then the odds ratios
decrease (that is, association between social origin and education is weakened)”. Testing
this hypothesis implies that we must leave the general contingency table approach to adopt
an educational transition approach and perform “surviving” analyses in the Mare’s tradition
23
on the same data. Starting from our seven-category variable describing final educational
destination, we thus assume that it results from a sequence of school continuation decisions
which can be described by five educational (or certification) transitions:
- getting any diploma v. no diploma at all (first transition);
- among those who succeeded in any diploma, getting at least a lower secondary or lower
vocational education diploma v. getting only a primary education certificate (second
transition);
- among those who survived the second transition, getting at least an upper secondary or
technical education diploma v. getting only a lower secondary or lower vocational education
diploma (third transition);
- among those who survived the third transition, getting a tertiary education degree v. getting
only an upper secondary or technical education diploma (fourth transition);
- finally, among those who succeeded in a tertiary education degree, getting an upper as
opposed to a lower tertiary education degree (fifth transition).
As Table 2 shows that observed rates characterizing the two most advantaged classes were
already close to saturation from the 1938-1942 birth cohort for the first two transitions 13 but
not the subsequent ones, a marked equalization trend should only have existed in the former
case in order to provide support for the “maximally maintained inequality” hypothesis. To
examine this prediction Table 4 contrasts the goodness of fit provided by the constant
association model and the ‘multiplicative uniform cohort effect’ association model for each of
the five transitions. The latter model very significantly improves on the former model in the
first and second transitions, but the improvement in fit is barely significant or not significant in
the third, fourth and fifth transitions. Moreover, by displaying the temporal pattern of log-
13 In that cohort, 93.2% of children of teachers (and assimilated occupations) and 85.7% of
children of higher-grade professionals and managers got a lower secondary or lower
vocational education diploma at least.
24
multiplicative parameters estimated for each of the five transitions, Figure 7 affords
consistent empirical support to the “maximally maintained inequality” hypothesis in the
French case. As regards the first transition, a downward trend in the general strength of
social origin effects clearly appears from the early decades of twentieth century. A decline is
also visible in the second transition from the 1938-1942 birth cohort to the last one – the
parameter falls from 0.997 till 0.742. On the contrary, remarkably constant social origin
effects characterize the third transition between the 1928-1932 and 1968-1972 birth cohorts
– all the estimated parameters lie between 1.196 and 1.124. Finally, a slow but nearly
monotonic increase in social origin effects appears for the fourth transition from the 1938-
1942 birth cohort14 and there is also a sharp rise over the last three cohorts in the fifth
transition.15 As mentioned in the introduction, these upward trends in social origin effects
may be related to the educational expansion which, by increasing the proportion of the total
population at risk at a given transition, also increases its heterogeneity on unmeasured
determinants of school continuation.
However, it must be emphasized that “maximally maintained inequality” is not synonymous
with “absolutely persistent inequality” because declining trends in social origin effects in early
transitions involve consequences for (unconditional) odds ratios associated with attainment
of upper diplomas. This result can be highlighted by collapsing all educational destinations in
only two categories, then comparing different dichotomies, or cut-off points, in the
educational system. We examined three dichotomies: at least lower secondary or lower
vocational education diploma v. less than that; at least upper secondary or technical
14 The estimated parameter is 0.837 in the 1938-1942 birth cohort, but 1.009 in the 1963-
1967 birth cohort and 0.967 in the 1968-1972 birth cohort. 15 As regards the very last transition, constraining the log-multiplicative parameter to be
exactly the same for the first four five-year birth cohorts seems insufficient to get reliable
estimates of the temporal pattern over the whole period (see Figure 7). However, such a
limitation does not impede comparability of parameters estimated for the most recent
cohorts.
25
education diploma v. less than that; at least lower tertiary education degree v. less than that.
Figure 8 displays trends independently estimated for each educational dichotomy using the
‘multiplicative uniform cohort effect’ association model. Although the first dichotomy is the
only one specifically associated with the first and second transitions characterized by
declining social origin effects, equalization trends also appear between the 1938-1942 and
1968-1972 cohorts for the second and third dichotomies, though on a slightly reduced scale
as compared to trend for the first dichotomy. This analysis therefore highlights to what extent
conditional and unconditional analyses can lead to different results on the same topic and the
same data.
Sensitivity of estimated trends to use of various indicators of social background
Research on Dutch data which investigated both the determination of final education level
and educational transitions concluded that the effect of father’s education did not decrease
as dramatically over time as the effect of father’s occupation, i.e. that “father’s education is
more resistant to change than father’s occupation [which is a pattern which] confirms the
expectations of cultural reproduction theory rather than those of modernization theory” (De
Graaf and Ganzeboom 1993, p. 97). In order to assess the sensitivity of estimated trends to
the definition of social background in the French case, we restricted the analysis to the 1977,
1985 and 1993 FQP surveys which permit to observe social background both in the
socioeconomic and cultural dimension.16
Figure 9 presents trends estimated over twelve five-year birth cohorts using the
‘multiplicative uniform cohort effect’ association model and three different definitions of social
background: the combination of father’s occupation and mother’s occupation (10 categories)
16 In that case, we do not use the original file for the 1977 FQP survey (with N=28,105 as
indicated in Table 1), but another file which includes the recoding of father’s occupation in
the new French socio-occupational classification introduced in 1982 (with N=28,113).
26
only involves the socioeconomic dimension; parents’ highest diploma (6 categories) only
involves the cultural dimension; the combination of father’s occupation and mother’s highest
diploma (10 categories) is a mixture of both dimensions. The ‘multiplicative uniform cohort
effect’ association model significantly improves on the constant association model in each
case, but the former model is not preferable to the latter on the basis of the BIC statistic when
social background is approached by parents’ highest diploma. This corresponds to the
estimated downward trend being less marked with this variable than with the two others.
Such a result is also confirmed by linearly restricting the log-multiplicative trend in the
estimation process: the annual pace of change amounts to -0.86% with the combination of
father’s occupation and mother’s occupation, -0.80% with the combination of father’s
occupation and mother’s highest diploma, but -0.49% only with parents’ highest diploma. In
the French case the existence of a decline in inequality of educational opportunity therefore
does not depend on the variable used to define social background, but the scale of the
decline is sensitive to the chosen indicator and the results strongly suggest that cultural
inequalities are more resistant to change than socioeconomic inequalities.
Examining the parameters of the best-fitting model
All the analyses above derive from the simplest log-multiplicative model which assumes that
change only occurred in strength of the origin – education association. However, the
‘regression-type cohort effect’ association model has proved the best-fitting model, which
implies that significant variations over birth cohorts occurred not only in strength, but also in
pattern of association between social origin and educational destination. Table 5 therefore
presents the corresponding parameters estimated on all men and women.
As a consequence of identifying constraints for the γc parameters, the set of λ
OE
oe
parameters describes the origin – education association in the last (1968-1972) birth cohort
while the set of ϕoe
parameters expresses the pattern of deviation characteristic of the first
27
(1908-1912) birth cohort as compared to the last one. Apart from an exception between the
1918-1922 and 1923-1927 cohorts the strength of the adjustment of the association declines
monotonically over the period, but change is especially marked between the 1933-1937 and
1948-1952 birth cohorts.17
In the 1968-1972 cohort, the highest diplomas (upper and lower tertiary degrees) are strongly
and positively associated with the most advantaged classes of origin (teachers and
assimilated occupations, then higher-grade professionals and managers). Conversely, they
are strongly and negatively associated with origins in the most disadvantaged classes
(agricultural and unskilled manual workers, then foremen and skilled manual workers, and
farmers and smallholders for upper tertiary degree only). An opposite pattern characterizes
the association between these social groups and the “no diploma” and “primary education
certificate” destinations. Finally, getting a lower vocational education diploma is positively
associated with origins in the class of farmers and smallholders and the class of agricultural
and unskilled manual workers, and negatively associated with the two most advantaged
classes.
Taking the absolute value of ϕoe
parameters and computing their average by row and
column highlights those classes of origin whose relative position has been transformed most
and those educational destinations with the most important contributions to historical change
in the pattern of association. It is especially visible that, in the past as compared to the 1968-
1972 cohort, the “no diploma” category was more strongly positively associated with
disadvantaged classes (especially farmers and smallholders) and more strongly negatively
associated with the two most advantaged classes and also the class of lower-grade
17 It is certainly difficult to provide a firm explanation for the irregularity in the 1923-1927
cohort, but it is worth noting that it was the first cohort affected by the 1933-1934 reform
which introduced the obligation of passing an examination to enter secondary education.
28
professionals and technicians and the class of routine non manual workers. Examining the
profile of ϕoe
parameters by row reveals that, as regards their educational destinations,
sons and daughters of farmers and smallholders considerably improved their relative position
over sixty years while the situation of children of artisans and shopkeepers remained much
more stable. In the early decades of the twentieth century, men and women originating in
four classes were characterized by more favorable (relative) educational trajectories than
they are in the most recent cohorts: these are the classes of teachers and assimilated
occupations, higher-grade professionals and managers, lower-grade professionals and
technicians, and routine non manual workers. Finally, historical change in the educational
destinations of the offspring of skilled and unskilled fractions of the working class appears
more complex. Children of foremen and skilled manual workers have improved their relative
position more than children of agricultural and unskilled manual workers. In the first birth
cohorts as compared to the last ones, the former were more positively associated with the
“no diploma” and “lower vocational diploma” categories and more negatively associated with
the “upper tertiary degree” category, but association did not change much between the
offspring of the unskilled fraction of the working class and the highest educational
destinations (upper secondary diploma, lower and upper tertiary degrees).
How much difference does the reduction in inequality of educational opportunity make?
To assess the concrete effects of change in inequality of educational opportunity, we start
with the origin – education tables estimated using the best-fitting model, i.e. the ‘regression-
type cohort effect’ association model. These tables have been constructed from a sample.
Firstly, by multiplying by an appropriate factor we can adjust the estimated table for the last
cohort in accordance with the margins that characterize French society in this generation, i.e.
the social origins and educational destinations of all French-born men and women born
between 1968 and 1972. We shall refer to this table as T. We now turn to the estimated
origin – education table for the first (1908-1912) birth cohort. If we apply the margins which
29
characterize French society in the last birth cohort to this we obtain a counterfactual table
showing what would have been the case in the 1968-1972 cohort if the association between
social origin and educational destination had remained exactly the same as it was in early
20th-century France. In order to do this we simply use the Deming-Stephan algorithm whose
essential feature is that it conserves all the odds ratios of the initial table. If we refer to the
resulting table as T’ we finally compute for each cell the difference T – T’ in order to show the
“reallocation” which occurred in the 1968-1972 cohort solely as a result of change in
inequality of educational opportunity over sixty years. These differences, rounded to the
nearest thousand, are given in Table 6 which also includes a second assessment of the
effect of change in the origin – education association based on the median (1938-1942) birth
cohort.
From the first table, it can be concluded that around 415,000 men and women, i.e. about
11% of all members in the 1968-1972 cohort, have educational destinations which differ from
those they would have held were the origin – education association strictly constant over
sixty years. Change is considerable for children of farmers and smallholders: 51% of them
hold different – and, in that case, better – educational destinations as a result of changing
association and equalization trend. This is the case for 7% of children of higher-grade
professionals and managers, of lower-grade professionals and technicians, and of
agricultural and unskilled manual workers; for 8% of children of artisans and shopkeepers;
and for 10% of children of teachers and assimilated occupations, of routine non manual
workers, and of foremen and skilled manual workers. Finally, it can be computed that change
in the association between social origin and educational destination over six decades
resulted in 101,000 “additional” men and women originating from disadvantaged classes, i.e.
the peasantry or the skilled or unskilled fractions of the working class, with diplomas in the
upper secondary, lower tertiary or upper tertiary categories; they represent nearly 6% of all
men and women in the 1968-1972 cohort with background in these social groups.
30
From the second table, it can similarly be concluded that changing origin – education
association over thirty years resulted in a reallocation of 216,000 men and women, i.e. about
6% of the last cohort, and that 55,000 “additional” men and women with background in the
three aforementioned disadvantaged classes rejoined the three highest educational
categories as a consequence of the democratization process per se.
Discussion and conclusion
In the conclusion of the article about France in which they demonstrated “a notable decline
among cohorts born in the 1940s in the strong association between father’s occupation and
highest degree obtained, and few sex differences in the trend in this association”, Smith and
Garnier (1986, pp. 339-40) stated: “We must temper these substantive findings by pointing
out the following. First, because our view of educational attainment is truncated beginning
with the birth cohort of 1950, we are unable to tell whether trends beginning with the cohorts
born during the 1940s were continued. Our suspicion is that an extension of this analysis to
more recent cohorts would confirm departures from the exceedingly high background-degree
association among individuals born during the 1920s and 1930s; however, we can hardly
rule out the possibility that what appears to us to be the onset of some diminution in this
association is in longer perspective a transitory phenomenon”.
In this article we have used seven nationally representative French surveys from 1964 to
1997 with a total sample of more than 240,000 cases as well as the most recent
methodologies in log-multiplicative contingency table analysis to replicate and extend Smith
and Garnier’s study on thirteen five-year cohorts of French-born men and women born
between 1908 and 1972. Our results undoubtedly corroborate Smith and Garnier’s previous
findings. In French society the general strength of the association between social origin and
educational destination has declined by more than 35% (in the logged odds ratios) over sixty
years – a result which parallels recent research about France which demonstrated increasing
intergenerational social fluidity between the 1950s and the 1990s (Vallet 2001). While it has
31
been nearly monotonic, change in the origin – education association was especially sharp
between the 1933-1937 and 1948-1952 birth cohorts, then largely leveled off in the three
subsequent cohorts, but took off again in the very last one. The decline in origin – education
association in France therefore seems largely independent of major secondary school
reforms explicitly introduced from the late 1950s to promote equality of educational
opportunity. The downward trend was more pronounced among women than men, especially
because the former were characterized by stronger origin – education association until
cohorts born in the mid-1930s. It seems to conform to predictions derived from the
“maximally maintained inequality” hypothesis and reveals itself as quite robust as its
existence does not depend on the variable used to define social background – though
change in origin – education association appears more resistant to cultural inequalities than
to socioeconomic inequalities. We have finally demonstrated that the improvement of
educational trajectories of children of farmers and smallholders played a major part in
accentuating the trend though not in creating it, and we have also assessed how much
difference in society the reduction in inequality of educational opportunity has made.
From a comparative perspective France therefore appears as the fourth national case – after
Sweden, the Netherlands and Germany – to challenge the “persistent inequality” conclusion
in education which was reached in the major comparative project directed by Shavit and
Blossfeld (1993). This strongly suggests that, in the current state of the art of educational
stratification studies, two research enterprises are entirely legitimate and have to be pursued:
first explaining, in the line of, e.g., Breen and Goldthorpe (1997), why class or socioeconomic
differentials in educational attainment exhibit a so strong inertia over time; second explaining
why, despite this considerable inertia, long-term investigations based on very large
representative samples and sufficiently powerful statistical techniques, are nonetheless able
to demonstrate a steady trend toward decreasing inequality which seems largely
independent of major educational reforms. Finally, it seems that, to pursue the second
enterprise, it is especially valuable to reconcile the global contingency table approach of
32
educational stratification with the more local educational transition approach which has long
been the dominant perspective in historical studies. While the educational transition
approach is based on a series of successive and conditional analyses which take account of
progressively reduced fractions of the entire population, the contingency table approach is
based on a single and unconditional analysis of the whole population. And, as we have
demonstrated for French society in this article, the general downward trend in origin –
education association is in fact compatible with remarkably stable, or even increasing social
origin effects in transitions associated with advanced stages of the educational system, but is
generated by the consequences of declining origin effects in the most basic transitions,
notably that one associated with the odds of getting any qualification and that one associated
with the odds of getting more than an elementary qualification.
The general title of this paper can therefore be understood in two different meanings. The
dynamics of inequality of educational opportunity primarily refers to the historical general
downward trend in origin – education association that we have documented for French
society. But the same expression secondarily refers to the contrasted and progressively
changing trends which characterize the association between social origins and completion of
successive educational transitions: as education expands over time, the earliest transitions
reveal a progressively decreasing association with social origins while the latest ones exhibit
a progressively increasing association with the same variable. On the basis of that result,
one might argue that the general downward trend in origin – education association is
essentially an artefact which only comes from the fact that each educational transition is
equally weighted over the entire covered period or birth cohorts. Such an argument would be
clearly related to the conception of education as a “positional good” (with, for instance, the
idea that holding a university degree is more important today for the future of individuals than
it was some decades ago). There is probably some truth in such an argument, but what
prevents us to accept it fully is that, even with the educational expansion, the earliest
educational transitions have not lost their own importance: in French society there is still a
33
significant fraction of the 1968-1972 birth cohort which has left the educational system
without holding any diploma.
34
REFERENCES
Boudon, Raymond. 1974. Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality: Changing Prospects
in Western Society. New York: Wiley.
Brauns, Hildegard. 1998. Bildung in Frankreich. Eine Studie zum Wandel herkunfts- und
geschlechtsspezifischen Bildungsverhaltens. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
—. 1999. “Soziale Herkunft und Bildungserfolg in Frankreich.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie
28:197-218.
Breen, Richard, and John H. Goldthorpe. 1997. “Explaining Educational Differentials:
Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory.” Rationality and Society 9:275-305.
Breen, Richard, and Jan O. Jonsson. 1997. “How Reliable Are Studies of Social Mobility? An
Investigation into the Consequences of Errors in Measuring Social Class.” Research in
Social Stratification and Mobility 15:91-112.
—. 2000. “Analyzing Educational Careers: A Multinomial Transition Model.” American
Sociological Review 65:754-72.
Cameron, Stephen V., and James J. Heckman. 1998. “Life Cycle Schooling and Dynamic
Selection Bias: Models and Evidence for Five Cohorts of American Males.” Journal of
Political Economy 106:262-333.
De Graaf, Paul M., and Harry B. G. Ganzeboom. 1993. “Family Background and Educational
Attainment in the Netherlands for the 1891-1960 Birth Cohorts.” Pp. 75-99 in Persistent
Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries, edited by Yossi Shavit
and Hans-Peter Blossfeld. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Duru-Bellat, Marie, and Annick Kieffer. 2000. “La démocratisation de l’enseignement en
France : polémiques autour d’une question d’actualité.” Population 55:51-79.
Erikson, Robert, and John H. Goldthorpe. 1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility
in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Garnier, Maurice A., and Lawrence E. Raffalovich. 1984. “The Evolution of Equality of
Educational Opportunities in France.” Sociology of Education 57:1-11.
35
Goodman, Leo A., and Michael Hout. 1998. “Statistical Methods and Graphical Displays for
Analyzing How the Association Between Two Qualitative Variables Differs Among
Countries, Among Groups, or Over Time: A Modified Regression-Type Approach.”
Sociological Methodology 28:175-230.
—. 2001. “Statistical Methods and Graphical Displays for Analyzing How the Association
Between Two Qualitative Variables Differs Among Countries, Among Groups, or Over
Time. Part II: Some Exploratory Techniques, Simple Models, and Simple Examples.”
Sociological Methodology 31:189-221.
Goux, Dominique, and Éric Maurin. 1995. “Origine sociale et destinée scolaire. L’inégalité
des chances devant l’enseignement à travers les enquêtes Formation – Qualification
Professionnelle 1970, 1977, 1985 et 1993.” Revue Française de Sociologie 36:81-121.
Hout, Michael, Adrian E. Raftery, and Eleanor O. Bell. 1993. “Making the Grade: Educational
Stratification in the United States, 1925-1989.”, Pp. 25-49 in Persistent Inequality:
Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries, edited by Yossi Shavit and Hans-
Peter Blossfeld. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Jonsson, Jan O., and Robert Erikson. 2000. “Understanding Educational Inequality: The
Swedish Experience.” L’Année Sociologique 50:345-82.
Jonsson, Jan O., Colin Mills, and Walter Müller. 1996. “A Half Century of Increasing
Educational Openness? Social Class, Gender and Educational Attainment in Sweden,
Germany and Britain.” Pp. 183-206 in Can Education Be Equalized? The Swedish Case in
Comparative Perspective, edited by Robert Erikson and Jan O. Jonsson. Boulder, Colo.:
Westview Press.
Lucas, Samuel R. 1996. “Selective Attrition in a Newly Hostile Regime: The Case of 1980
Sophomores.” Social Forces 75:511-33.
—. 2001. “Effectively Maintained Inequality: Education Transitions, Track Mobility, and Social
Background Effects.” American Journal of Sociology 106:1642-90.
Mare, Robert D. 1980. “Social Background and School Continuation Decisions.” Journal of
the American Statistical Association 75:295-305.
36
—. 1981. “Change and Stability in Educational Stratification.” American Sociological Review
46:72-87.
—. 1993. “Educational Stratification on Observed and Unobserved Components of Family
Background.” Pp. 351-76 in Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in
Thirteen Countries, edited by Yossi Shavit and Hans-Peter Blossfeld. Boulder, Colo.:
Westview Press.
Müller, Walter, and Wolfgang Karle. 1993. “Social Selection in Educational Systems in
Europe.” European Sociological Review 9:1-23.
Prost, Antoine. 1986. L’enseignement s’est-il démocratisé ? Les élèves des lycées et
collèges de l’agglomération d’Orléans de 1945 à 1980. Paris: Presses Universitaires de
France.
—. 1990. “Schooling and Social Stratification: Paradoxes of the Reform of the Middle School
in 20th-Century France.” Pp. 38-61 in The Comprehensive School Experiment Revisited,
edited by Achim Lechinsky and Karl Ulrich Mayer. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
—. 1992. Éducation, société et politiques. Une histoire de l’enseignement en France, de
1945 à nos jours. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Rijken, Susanne. 1999. “Educational Expansion and Status Attainment: A Cross-National
and Over-Time Comparison.” Ph.D. thesis. Utrecht University, Interuniversity Center for
Social Science Theory and Methodology.
Shavit, Yossi, and Hans-Peter Blossfeld. 1993. Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational
Attainment in Thirteen Countries. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Shavit, Yossi, and Karin Westerbeek. 1998. “Educational Stratification in Italy: Reforms,
Expansion, and Equality of Opportunity.” European Sociological Review 14:33-47.
Smith, Herbert L., and Paul P. L. Cheung. 1986. “Trends in the Effects of Family Background
on Educational Attainment in the Philippines.” American Journal of Sociology 91:1387-
1408.
Smith, Herbert L., and Maurice A. Garnier. 1986. “Association Between Background and
Educational Attainment in France.” Sociological Methods and Research 14:317-44.
37
Treiman, Donald J., and Harry B. G. Ganzeboom. 2000. “The Fourth Generation of
Comparative Stratification Research.” Pp. 123-50 in The International Handbook of
Sociology, edited by Stella R. Quah and Arnaud Sales. London: Sage Publications.
Vallet, Louis-André. 2001. “Forty Years of Social Mobility in France: Change in Social Fluidity
in the Light of Recent Models.” Revue Française de Sociologie: An Annual English
Selection 42(Supplement):5-64.
Xie, Yu. 1992. “The Log-Multiplicative Layer Effect Model for Comparing Mobility Tables.”
American Sociological Review 57:380-95.
38
TABLE 1
OVERALL DESIGN TO STUDY THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL ORIGIN AND EDUCATIONAL
DESTINATION OVER THIRTEEN FIVE-YEAR BIRTH COHORTS USING SEVEN SURVEYS
Birth cohort FQP 1964 FQP 1970 FQP 1977 FQP 1985 FQP 1993 Emploi 1993
Emploi 1997 Sample size
1908-1912 aged 58-62 [ (2,304) ]
aged 65-69 (1,273) 1,273
[ 3,577 ]
1913-1917 aged 53-57 [ (1,920) ]
aged 60-64 (1,372) 1,372
[ 3,292 ]
1918-1922 aged 42-46 (2,219)
aged 48-52 (2,756)
aged 55-59 (2,218)
aged 63-67 (1,264) 8,457
1923-1927 aged 37-41 (2,635)
aged 43-47 (3,561)
aged 50-54 (3,361)
aged 58-62 (2,073) 11,630
1928-1932 aged 32-36 (2,622)
aged 38-42 (3,630)
aged 45-49 (3,477)
aged 53-57 (2,729) 12,458
1933-1937 aged 27-31 (2,349)
aged 33-37 (3,369)
aged 40-44 (3,351)
aged 48-52 (2,953)
aged 56-60 (1,505)
aged 56-60 (8,258) 21,785
1938-1942 aged 28-32 (3,394)
aged 35-39 (3,050)
aged 43-47 (2,813)
aged 51-55 (1,437)
aged 51-55 (7,467)
aged 55-59 (7,332) 25,493
1943-1947 aged 30-34 (4,872)
aged 38-42 (3,767)
aged 46-50 (1,850)
aged 46-50 (9,778)
aged 50-54 (9,078) 29,345
1948-1952 aged 25-29 (5,131)
aged 33-37 (5,044)
aged 41-45 (2,107)
aged 41-45 (12,239)
aged 45-49 (11,597) 36,118
1953-1957 aged 28-32 (5,212)
aged 36-40 (2,068)
aged 36-40 (11,928)
aged 40-44 (11,481) 30,689
1958-1962 aged 31-35 (1,942)
aged 31-35 (11,689)
aged 35-39 (11,725) 25,356
1963-1967 aged 26-30 (1,904)
aged 26-30 (11,803)
aged 30-34 (11,621) 25,328
1968-1972 aged 25-29 (11,063) 11,063
Sample size 9,825 16,710 [ 20,934 ] 28,105 25,855 12,813 73,162 73,897 240,367
[ 244,591 ]
In the 1964 FQP survey the contingency table cross-classifying social origin and educational
destination can be built on a sample of 2,219 French-born men and women in the 1918-1922 birth
cohort, i.e. aged between 42 and 46 at the time of the survey.
As each survey used a complex sampling design, each contingency table was computed using
appropriate reweighting, then downscaled without altering its structure to reflect the exact sample
surveyed, e.g. 2,219 for the 1918-1922 birth cohort in the 1964 FQP survey. The same process
was also replicated separately on tables for males and tables for females.
The 1970 FQP survey data for the 1908-1912 and 1913-1917 birth cohorts cannot be used in all
the analyses as they do not distinguish between lower and upper tertiary education.
39
TABLE 2
EDUCATIONAL DESTINATIONS FOR EACH CATEGORY OF SOCIAL ORIGINS IN THE 1908-1912 BIRTH
COHORT (N=3,577), THE 1938-1942 BIRTH COHORT (N=25,493) AND THE 1968-1972 BIRTH COHORT
(N=11,063)
Birth cohort No diploma Primary
education certificate
Lower secondary diploma
Lower vocational diploma
Upper secondary diploma
Lower/upper tertiary degree
Total
Farmers and smallholders 1908-1912 66.1 28.4 1.3 2.3 1.1 0.9 100
1938-1942 28.0 40.2 4.6 18.0 4.5 4.6 100
1968-1972 9.6 0.8 2.3 33.3 21.1 32.9 100
Artisans and shopkeepers 1908-1912 38.2 45.1 5.6 6.2 3.5 1.4 100
1938-1942 14.2 24.9 10.2 24.9 12.4 13.5 100
1968-1972 12.8 1.4 5.6 31.4 15.8 33.1 100
Higher-grade professionals 1908-1912 19.7 24.9 12.3 12.5 16.0 14.6 100
and managers 1938-1942 7.1 7.3 8.3 12.8 20.5 44.0 100
1968-1972 4.9 0.1 3.0 8.7 18.6 64.8 100
Teachers and assimilated 1908-1912 17.1 25.7 8.6 7.3 21.6 19.8 100
occupations 1938-1942 4.9 2.0 7.2 11.3 18.9 55.7 100
1968-1972 4.2 0.3 2.5 8.0 15.6 69.4 100
Lower-grade professionals 1908-1912 15.2 35.1 15.6 16.5 12.4 5.2 100
and technicians 1938-1942 9.6 14.0 10.9 24.6 18.3 22.5 100
1968-1972 7.4 0.3 4.4 18.3 20.4 49.3 100
Routine non manual 1908-1912 39.1 38.1 5.5 10.3 4.1 2.9 100
workers 1938-1942 15.4 21.7 9.4 28.3 12.6 12.6 100
1968-1972 14.5 0.7 5.4 31.2 19.5 28.6 100
Foremen and skilled 1908-1912 45.9 37.6 3.6 9.3 2.3 1.3 100
manual workers 1938-1942 20.8 30.1 5.6 29.1 8.3 6.1 100
1968-1972 19.1 0.8 5.5 35.2 18.1 21.4 100
Agricultural and unskilled 1908-1912 65.2 27.8 1.1 4.8 0.8 0.3 100
manual workers 1938-1942 30.2 33.4 4.7 23.4 4.7 3.6 100
1968-1972 27.3 1.7 6.6 38.2 14.1 12.2 100
Total 1908-1912 51.5 32.7 3.8 6.2 3.4 2.4 100 1938-1942 20.8 28.1 6.7 23.3 9.5 11.6 100
1968-1972 15.0 0.8 5.0 28.6 17.7 32.9 100
40
TABLE 3
RESULTS OF FITTING THE NULL ASSOCIATION, CONSTANT ASSOCIATION, ‘MULTIPLICATIVE UNIFORM
COHORT EFFECT’ ASSOCIATION AND ‘REGRESSION-TYPE COHORT EFFECT’ ASSOCIATION MODELS TO
CONTINGENCY TABLES CROSS-CLASSIFYING SOCIAL ORIGIN (8 CATEGORIES) AND EDUCATIONAL
DESTINATION (7 CATEGORIES) OVER THIRTEEN FIVE-YEAR BIRTH COHORTS
Model G2 df DI rG2 Bic All men and women (N=240,367) 1. Null association 50,388.8 546 15.9 - 43,623.9 2. Constant association 4,107.8 504 4.1 91.8 -2,136.7 3. Multiplicative uniform cohort effect 3,442.1 492 3.9 93.2 -2,653.7 4. Regression-type cohort effect 799.2 451 1.7 98.4 -4,788.6 Men and women, disregarding children of farmers and smallholders (N=200,550) 1. Null association 43,928.6 468 16.6 - 38,214.9 2. Constant association 1,552.7 432 2.8 96.5 -3,721.5 3. Multiplicative uniform cohort effect 1,301.5 420 2.7 97.0 -3,826.2 4. Regression-type cohort effect 582.7 385 1.6 98.7 -4,117.7 Men only (N=127,229) 1. Null association 28,039.4 546 16.4 - 21,621.9 2. Constant association 2,587.4 504 4.6 90.8 -3,336.5 3. Multiplicative uniform cohort effect 2,190.6 492 4.3 92.2 -3,592.2 4. Regression-type cohort effect 647.8 451 2.1 97.7 -4,653.1 Women only (N=113,138) 1. Null association 23,773.5 546 16.1 - 17,420.1 2. Constant association 2,000.8 504 4.1 91.6 -3,864.0 3. Multiplicative uniform cohort effect 1,685.6 492 3.9 92.9 -4,039.5 4. Regression-type cohort effect 580.1 451 2.0 97.6 -4,667.9
41
TABLE 4
RESULTS OF FITTING THE CONSTANT ASSOCIATION AND ‘MULTIPLICATIVE UNIFORM COHORT EFFECT’
ASSOCIATION MODELS TO FIVE SUCCESSIVE EDUCATIONAL TRANSITIONS OVER THIRTEEN FIVE-YEAR
BIRTH COHORTS
Model G2 df DI rG2 Bic First transition (N=240,367) 2. Constant association 1,094.2 84 1.8 90.5 53.5 3. Multiplicative uniform cohort effect 920.9 72 1.8 92.0 28.9 Second transition (N=189,603) 2. Constant association 1,050.8 84 2.1 92.1 30.0 3. Multiplicative uniform cohort effect 963.8 75 2.2 92.8 52.3 Third transition (N=142,588) 2. Constant association 209.4 84 1.1 98.9 -787.5 3. Multiplicative uniform cohort effect 191.1 75 1.0 99.0 -699.0 Fourth transition (N=63,739) 2. Constant association 140.0 84 1.5 95.5 -789.3 3. Multiplicative uniform cohort effect 127.4 75 1.4 95.9 -702.3 Fifth transition (N=38,065) 2. Constant association 117.6 84 1.7 93.5 -768.4 3. Multiplicative uniform cohort effect 98.4 75 1.4 94.6 -692.7
For the second, third, fourth, and fifth transitions, the log-multiplicative parameter has been
constrained to be the same for the first four five-year birth cohorts in order to get more reliable
estimates of the temporal pattern. Such a constraint does not result in a significant worsening of
the model fit at the 5% level for three degrees of freedom.
42
TABLE 5
PARAMETERS OF THE ‘REGRESSION-TYPE COHORT EFFECT’ ASSOCIATION MODEL APPLIED TO ALL MEN
AND WOMEN (N=240,367) – BASELINE PATTERN OF ASSOCIATION ( λOE
oe PARAMETERS), PATTERN OF
DEVIATION (ϕoe
PARAMETERS) AND STRENGTH OF DEVIATION (γc
PARAMETERS) OVER BIRTH
COHORTS
λOE
oe parameters No diploma
Primary education certificate
Lower secondary diploma
Lower vocational diploma
Upper secondary diploma
Lower tertiary degree
Upper tertiary degree
Farmers and smallholders -0.190 0.492 -0.021 0.529 0.033 -0.132 -0.711 Artisans and shopkeepers -0.036 0.042 0.032 0.125 -0.036 -0.054 -0.073 Higher-grade professionals
and managers -0.479 -1.064 -0.089 -0.640 0.284 0.650 1.339 Teachers and assimilated
occupations -0.583 -1.446 -0.201 -0.589 0.421 0.797 1.602 Lower-grade professionals
and technicians -0.271 -0.319 0.033 -0.203 0.123 0.294 0.342 Routine non manual workers 0.215 0.327 0.035 0.083 -0.072 -0.212 -0.375 Foremen and skilled manual
workers 0.508 0.821 0.031 0.268 -0.281 -0.501 -0.847 Agricultural and unskilled manual
workers 0.836 1.146 0.181 0.428 -0.472 -0.842 -1.277
ϕoe
parameters No diploma Primary
education certificate
Lower secondary diploma
Lower vocational diploma
Upper secondary diploma
Lower tertiary degree
Upper tertiary degree
Farmers and smallholders 2.325 0.883 -0.153 -0.828 -0.915 -1.006 -0.307 Artisans and shopkeepers 0.001 0.170 0.142 -0.032 -0.017 -0.235 -0.029 Higher-grade professionals
and managers -0.709 0.135 0.032 0.067 0.297 0.205 -0.027 Teachers and assimilated
occupations -1.333 0.227 0.544 -0.490 0.302 0.579 0.170 Lower-grade professionals
and technicians -0.847 -0.203 0.189 0.315 0.279 0.095 0.172 Routine non manual workers -0.531 -0.399 0.107 0.282 0.008 0.279 0.256 Foremen and skilled manual
workers 0.320 -0.400 -0.207 0.518 0.058 -0.021 -0.268 Agricultural and unskilled manual
workers 0.774 -0.414 -0.653 0.169 -0.013 0.104 0.033
Birth cohort 1908-1912 1913-1917 1918-1922 1923-1927 1928-1932 1933-1937 1938-1942
γc
parameters 1 0.891 0.758 0.867 0.772 0.673 0.519
Birth cohort 1943-1947 1948-1952 1953-1957 1958-1962 1963-1967 1968-1972
γc
parameters 0.357 0.241 0.200 0.175 0.101 0
The λOE
oe and ϕ
oe parameters are estimated using effect coding identifying constraints. The
software used does not compute the standard error on the parameters of a log-multiplicative
model.
43
TABLE 6
TWO ASSESSMENTS OF THE CONCRETE EFFECTS OF CHANGE IN INEQUALITY OF EDUCATIONAL
OPPORTUNITY ON MEMBERS OF THE LAST BIRTH COHORT (FRENCH-BORN MEN AND WOMEN BORN
BETWEEN 1968 AND 1972)
Effect of change between the 1908-1912 birth cohort and the 1968-1972 birth cohort
No diploma Primary
education certificate
Lower secondary diploma
Lower vocational diploma
Upper secondary diploma
Lower tertiary degree
Upper tertiary degree
Total (thousands)
Farmers and smallholders -107 -4 0 +57 +27 +23 +4 (219) Artisans and shopkeepers +13 -2 -10 +10 -10 +9 -10 (410) Higher-grade professionals
and managers +14 0 -1 +6 -18 -12 +11 (428) Teachers and assimilated
occupations +5 0 -2 +8 -1 -13 +4 (166) Lower-grade professionals
and technicians +23 0 -4 -1 -14 +4 -8 (376) Routine non manual
workers +59 +1 -7 -10 +4 -24 -22 (608) Foremen and skilled
manual workers +39 +2 +8 -90 +5 +15 +21 (921) Agricultural and unskilled
manual workers -44 +2 +17 +20 +7 -1 0 (616)
Total (thousands) (561) (31) (185) (1,071) (664) (614) (617) (3,744)
In the population of French-born men and women born between 1968 and 1972, 219,000 are
children of farmers and smallholders. As a result of change in the association between social origin
and educational destination over 60 years, 107,000 do not belong to the “no diploma” category and
4,000 do not hold a primary education certificate; 57,000 of these hold a lower vocational diploma.
Effect of change between the 1938-1942 birth cohort and the 1968-1972 birth cohort
No diploma Primary
education certificate
Lower secondary diploma
Lower vocational diploma
Upper secondary diploma
Lower tertiary degree
Upper tertiary degree
Total (thousands)
Farmers and smallholders -45 -2 -2 +27 +12 +11 0 (219) Artisans and shopkeepers +5 -1 -5 +5 -4 +5 -4 (410) Higher-grade professionals
and managers +8 0 -1 +3 -10 -7 +6 (428) Teachers and assimilated
occupations +4 0 -1 +5 -1 -7 +1 (166) Lower-grade professionals
and technicians +14 0 -2 -2 -8 +1 -4 (376) Routine non manual
workers +34 0 -4 -8 +2 -13 -11 (608) Foremen and skilled
manual workers +12 +1 +4 -43 +4 +9 +12 (921) Agricultural and unskilled
manual workers -31 +1 +10 +13 +5 +1 +1 (616)
Total (thousands) (561) (31) (185) (1,071) (664) (614) (617) (3,744)
44
In the population of French-born men and women born between 1968 and 1972, 219,000 are
children of farmers and smallholders. As a result of change in the association between social origin
and educational destination over 30 years, 45,000 do not belong to the “no diploma” category,
2,000 do not hold a primary education certificate and 2,000 do not hold a lower secondary diploma;
27,000 of these hold a lower vocational diploma.
45
FIGURE 1
TRENDS IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF SOCIAL ORIGINS (FATHER’S OCCUPATION) OVER THIRTEEN FIVE-
YEAR BIRTH COHORTS (N=244,591)
0
10
20
30
08-12 13-17 18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 53-57 58-62 63-67 68-72
Birth cohort 19 ...
Prop
ortio
n (%
)
Farmers and smallholders Artisans and shopkeepersHigher-grade professionals and managers Teachers and assimilated occupations
Lower-grade professionals and technicians Routine non manual workersForemen and skilled manual workers Agricultural and unskilled manual workers
46
FIGURE 2
TRENDS IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF EDUCATIONAL DESTINATIONS (HIGHEST DEGREE OBTAINED) OVER
THIRTEEN FIVE-YEAR BIRTH COHORTS (N=240,367)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
08-12 13-17 18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 53-57 58-62 63-67 68-72
Birth cohort 19 ...
Prop
ortio
n (%
)
No diploma (or no information) Primary education certificateLower secondary education diploma Lower vocational education diploma
Upper secondary or technical education diploma Lower tertiary education degreeUpper tertiary education degree
47
FIGURE 3
CHANGE IN THE GENERAL STRENGTH OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL ORIGIN AND EDUCATIONAL
DESTINATION – ‘MULTIPLICATIVE UNIFORM COHORT EFFECT’ ASSOCIATION MODEL ESTIMATED OVER
THIRTEEN FIVE-YEAR BIRTH COHORTS (N=240,367)
0,500
0,600
0,700
0,800
0,900
1,000
1,100
1,200
08-12 13-17 18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 53-57 58-62 63-67 68-72
Birth cohort 19 ...
Log
-mul
tiplic
ativ
e pa
ram
eter
All social origins Disregarding farmers and smallholders
48
FIGURE 4
CHANGE IN THE GENERAL STRENGTH OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL ORIGIN AND EDUCATIONAL
DESTINATION – ‘MULTIPLICATIVE UNIFORM COHORT EFFECT’ ASSOCIATION MODEL ESTIMATED
SEPARATELY ON EACH SURVEY
0,500
0,600
0,700
0,800
0,900
1,000
1,100
1,200
08-12 13-17 18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 53-57 58-62 63-67 68-72
Birth cohort 19 ...
Log
-mul
tiplic
ativ
e pa
ram
eter
FQP 1964 (N=9,825) FQP 1970 (N=16,710) FQP 1977 (N=28,105) FQP 1985 (N=25,855)FQP 1993 (N=12,813) Emploi 1993 (N=73,162) Emploi 1997 (N=73,897)
For the purpose of comparison the first log-multiplicative parameter for each survey is adjusted to
reproduce its estimated value in the 1977 FQP survey exactly; the subsequent parameters are
adjusted accordingly.
49
FIGURE 5
CHANGE IN THE GENERAL STRENGTH OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL ORIGIN AND EDUCATIONAL
DESTINATION – ‘MULTIPLICATIVE UNIFORM COHORT EFFECT’ ASSOCIATION MODEL ESTIMATED
SIMULTANEOUSLY ON THE WHOLE SET OF BASIC CONTINGENCY TABLES (N=240,367)
0,500
0,600
0,700
0,800
0,900
1,000
1,100
1,200
1,300
08-12 13-17 18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 53-57 58-62 63-67 68-72
Birth cohort 19 ...
Log
-mul
tiplic
ativ
e pa
ram
eter
FQP 1964 FQP 1970 FQP 1977 FQP 1985 FQP 1993 Emploi 1993 Emploi 1997
50
FIGURE 6
CHANGE IN THE GENERAL STRENGTH OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL ORIGIN AND EDUCATIONAL
DESTINATION – ‘MULTIPLICATIVE UNIFORM COHORT EFFECT’ ASSOCIATION MODEL ESTIMATED
SIMULTANEOUSLY ON TABLES FOR MALES AND FOR FEMALES
0,500
0,600
0,700
0,800
0,900
1,000
1,100
1,200
1,300
08-12 13-17 18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 53-57 58-62 63-67 68-72
Birth cohort 19 ...
Log
-mul
tiplic
ativ
e pa
ram
eter
Men (N=127,229) Women (N=113,138)
51
FIGURE 7
CHANGE IN THE GENERAL STRENGTH OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL ORIGIN AND SURVIVING IN AN
EDUCATIONAL TRANSITION – ‘MULTIPLICATIVE UNIFORM COHORT EFFECT’ ASSOCIATION MODEL
ESTIMATED CONSIDERING FIVE SUCCESSIVE EDUCATIONAL TRANSITIONS
0,500
0,750
1,000
1,250
1,500
1,750
2,000
2,250
08-12 13-17 18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 53-57 58-62 63-67 68-72
Birth cohort 19 ...
Log
-mul
tiplic
ativ
e pa
ram
eter
First transition Second transition Third transition Fourth transition Fifth transition
52
FIGURE 8
CHANGE IN THE GENERAL STRENGTH OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL ORIGIN AND EDUCATIONAL
DESTINATION – ‘MULTIPLICATIVE UNIFORM COHORT EFFECT’ ASSOCIATION MODEL ESTIMATED
INDEPENDENTLY CONSIDERING THREE DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL DICHOTOMIES
0,500
0,600
0,700
0,800
0,900
1,000
1,100
1,200
08-12 13-17 18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 53-57 58-62 63-67 68-72
Birth cohort 19 ...
Log
-mul
tiplic
ativ
e pa
ram
eter
At least lower secondary or lower vocational education diploma v. less than that (N=244,591)
At least upper secondary or technical education diploma v. less than that (N=244,591)At least lower tertiary education degree v. less than that (N=244,591)
53
FIGURE 9
CHANGE IN THE GENERAL STRENGTH OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL BACKGROUND AND
EDUCATIONAL DESTINATION – ‘MULTIPLICATIVE UNIFORM COHORT EFFECT’ ASSOCIATION MODEL
ESTIMATED INDEPENDENTLY CONSIDERING THREE DEFINITIONS OF SOCIAL BACKGROUND
0,500
0,600
0,700
0,800
0,900
1,000
1,100
1,200
08-12 13-17 18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 53-57 58-62 63-67
Birth cohort 19 ...
Log
-mul
tiplic
ativ
e pa
ram
eter
Combination of father's occupation and mother's highest diploma (N=66,781)
Combination of father's occupation and mother's occupation (N=66,781)Parents' highest diploma (N=66,781)