The determinants of women employment in the police department

10
Taehyun Kwon Econ 539

description

The determinants of women employment in the police department. Taehyun Kwon Econ 539. Main literature. “Affirmative Action, Political Representation, Unions, and Female Police Employment.” Tim R.Sass and Jennifer L.Troyer, 1999 Journal of Labor Research 20(4), 571-587. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The determinants of women employment in the police department

Page 1: The determinants of women employment in the police department

Taehyun Kwon

Econ 539

Page 2: The determinants of women employment in the police department

“Affirmative Action, Political Representation, Unions, and Female Police Employment.”

Tim R.Sass and Jennifer L.Troyer, 1999

Journal of Labor Research 20(4), 571-587.

Page 3: The determinants of women employment in the police department

Neo-classical human capital theory - more part time - less work hour

Theory of labor market discrimination - employer, co-workers, customers

Page 4: The determinants of women employment in the police department

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's EEO-4 survey

the LMW Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) survey

The Police Personnel Practices survey performed by the International City/County Management Association (ICMA)

Page 5: The determinants of women employment in the police department

f = f (L, Ir, V, Im, U, A, C)

L: Labor force participation rate of adult women in a community

Ir: Gender of city councilors or the mayor V: Voter preferences Im: Level of satisfaction of the city manager U: Existence of a police union A: existence of one or more previous court-

decided EEO lawsuits C: nonpecuniary characteristics of the job of

police officer

Page 6: The determinants of women employment in the police department

variable 1981 1987 1987 1991 1991

Council-Manager city

-1.50[-0.90]

-5.58*[-3.43]

-6.33**[-4.10]

3.37[2.02]

1.22[0.79]

Judicial decisions

16.23**[9.74]

11.90*[7.31]

8.48 -2.96 -3.24

Union -0.27 9.25* 11.34* 2.98 4.92*

Male Employee

-1.14** -1.78** -1.78** -1.20** -1.15**

Lagged Pct. Female New hires

_ _ 0.15* _ 0.01

Page 7: The determinants of women employment in the police department

variable 1981-1987

1987-1990/91

1987-1990/91

1981-1990/91

Council-Manager city

1.681**[0.985]

0.360[0.180]

0.679[0.343]

1.705**[1.032]

Judicial decisions

6.272**[3.674]

1.840[0.922]

1.467[0.721]

8.562**[5.184]

Union -1.870**[-1.095]

0.331[0.166]

0.202[0.099]

-0.919[-0.556]

Male Employee

-0.476**[0.279]

-0.202**[0.101]

0.277**[0.136]

0.615**[0.372]

Lagged Pct. Female New hires

_ _ 0.021[0.010]

_

Page 8: The determinants of women employment in the police department

Vivian Price, 2002, “Race, Affirmative Action, and Women’s Employment in US Highway Construction.” Feminist Economics 8(2), 87-113.

Kevin M. O’Brien, 2003, “The determinants of minority employment in police and fire departments.”, The Journal of Socio-Economics 32, 183-195.

Page 9: The determinants of women employment in the police department

Anti-discrimination litigation - positive(+) Existence of Female Councilors or mayors - didn’t significantly affect - O’Brien : support The proportion of male officers - negative(-) Labor union - Ambiguous(∆)

Page 10: The determinants of women employment in the police department

Female councilors or mayor - doesn’t affect - Black mayor + EEO complaints(O’Brien) - EEO complaints = Judicial, advocate,

community pressure(?) Labor union - mid 1980, early 1990 - negative → positive - further research