The Detection and Determination of Human Skeletal Remains ... · APPENDIX 2: “WRESTLER BODY IN...
27
438 10 APPENDICES
Transcript of The Detection and Determination of Human Skeletal Remains ... · APPENDIX 2: “WRESTLER BODY IN...
438
10 APPENDICES
439
APPENDIX 1: SURVEY ISSUED TO POLICE SERVICES
To ___________
Re: Doctoral Research in Forensic Anthropology
I am writing to request information to assist with my PhD research in Forensic Anthropology. The title of my thesis is “The Detection and Determination of Human Skeletal Remains in the Australian Environment”. The principal aim of this research is to provide results that have obvious application to major crime investigations. I am a student at the University of Adelaide (Department of Anatomical Sciences), a member of the Australia and New Zealand Forensic Science Society and am employed by the South Australia Police as a Senior Project Officer.
The two primary objectives of this research are: To establish the visual characteristics of gravesites over time to aid in detection; To establish the effectiveness of different remote sensing instruments for the detection of human skeletal remains.
Experimental sites have been set up specifically for my research and involve three buried kangaroos, and three buried pigs in a remote area.
For the purposes of defining the current situation regarding the detection of clandestine graves in Australia, I am seeking information from all police jurisdictions. Currently, there are no collective statistics maintained on homicide victims that relate to this issue. It is envisaged that such data would be of benefit to all police services. The information would be collated to show Australian figures and NOT individual state figures in the context of my research because the totals would be relatively low.
The data requested (for the period 1995 – 2000) is as follows:
Number of murder victims not found initially because their place of deposit was not known;
440
Number of outstanding unrecovered bodies pre- dating 1995;
The methods whereby the bodies have been detected and recovered during the period 1995- 2000;
The type of site where the body was deposited.
A proforma has been prepared and attached to facilitate ease of data collection.
It is to be emphasized that my request is not for confidential data but only statistics which will be used collectively to establish current methodologies used for the detection of skeletal remains, the most common situations encountered by police, and the size of the problem in Australia. I am very aware that such statistics are not collated as a matter of course (and have previously contacted the National Homicide Monitoring Data Base) and appreciate the inconvenience of such a request. However, if my results are to have meaning and assist police it is necessary to establish a context and common scenarios.
Your assistance and time would be very much appreciated. I am sure that my collation of the results would be of interest and I would be pleased to discuss any aspect of my research further with you.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Kathryn Powell
441
INFORMATION RELATING TO CLANDESTINE GRAVES1995 -2000
POLICE SERVICE (BY STATE) ____________________
Description Statistics 2002
Number of murder victims not found initially because their place of deposit was not known.
(Total for 1995-2000)
Number not found within 0-3 months Number not found within 6 months Number not found within 12 months Number not found within 2 years Number not found within 3 years Number not found within 5 years
(Sub-totals of above figure)
Number of outstanding unrecovered bodies pre-dating 1995.
Total :
The methods whereby the bodies have been detected and recovered during the period 1995-2000 by the following categories;
Insert numbers below
Passers-by (communitymembers)
Police ground search (visual search)
442
Offender or other disclosing verbal information
Ground penetrating radar
Cadaver dogs
Aerial surveillance
FLIR
Other (please state methods)
The type of site where the body was deposited.
Remote area (outer metropolitan)_____(total)Of the total, how many:
Close to road_____ Carefully disguised____ Underbushes/trees/logs___Shallow burial____
Suburban/metropolitan area.
Any other comments you would like to make concerning this issue:
443
APPENDIX 2: “WRESTLER BODY IN STRAWBERRY PATCH” (copied with permission from the Advertiser, South Australia)
Bowman, M. (2001) Wrestler ‘body in strawberry patch’. The Advertiser, Monday, November 12, 2001, p. 15.
NOTE: This article is included in the print copy of the thesis held in the University of Adelaide Library.
444
APPENDIX 3: “X- RAY TO HELP SOLVE RIDDLES” (copied with permission from the Advertiser, South Australia)
Madigan, S. (1999) X-ray to help solve riddles. Sunday Mail, April 18, 1999, p. 11.
NOTE: This article is included in the print copy of the thesis held in the University of Adelaide Library.
445
APPENDIX 4: REPORTED MEDIA CASES 2000- 2004
Table 61: Reported media cases of human remains found 2000- 2004.
State/Territory Number of individuals Queensland 45 New South Wales 41 Victoria 39 Western Australia 21 South Australia 18 Northern Territory 13 Tasmania 7 TOTAL 184 Note there were no reported cases from the Australian Capital Territory.
APPEN
DIX
5: T
AB
LES O
F C
HEM
ICA
L A
NA
LY
SES O
F S
OIL
SA
MPLES
Ta
ble
62
: M
ea
ns
of
X-ra
y f
luore
scen
ce e
lem
en
t re
sult
s fo
r so
il s
am
ple
s fr
om
th
e a
nim
al gra
vesi
tes
an
d h
um
an
gra
vesi
te 1
. (S
am
ple
s ta
ken
fro
m t
he m
iddle
an
d 1
m f
rom
th
e a
nim
al gra
vesi
tes
an
d o
f h
um
an
gra
vesi
te 1
).
Sit
eM
g
Si
P
S
K
Ca
F
e
Ni
Cu
Z
n
Br
Rb
S
r Z
r B
a
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
µg
/g
µg
/g
µg
/g
µg
/g
µg
/g
µg
/g
µg
/g
µg
/g
Ka
ng
aro
os
1m
fro
m
gra
ve
0.4
5
21
.84
0
.03
0
.06
0.8
81
.38
1.1
85
.10
7.4
6
19
.95
9.6
63
3.8
48
3.2
71
78
.17
13
3.3
9
Centr
e o
f g
rave
0.6
4
19
.15
0
.03
0
.06
0.8
73
.46
1.2
35
.90
11
.90
2
0.5
51
3.0
03
3.0
01
36
.75
15
5.7
51
26
.60
Pig
s
1m
fro
m
gra
ve
0.3
6
24
.71
0
.04
0
.06
0.8
60
.55
1.0
84
.52
9.3
6
17
.60
7.8
63
2.2
25
3.5
11
73
.65
12
0.4
6
Centr
e o
f g
rave
0.3
6
20
.60
0
.06
0
.07
0.9
51
.22
1.2
88
.70
9.9
0
23
.85
9.7
03
6.1
56
8.8
01
65
.90
13
5.2
5
So
il s
am
ple
s
0.2
8
23
.77
0
.04
5
0.0
60
.77
0.5
60
.85
5.9
07
.88
1
8.7
56
.73
25
.75
40
.63
15
7.4
01
21
.45
Ca
da
ve
r
Fe
et e
nd
* 0
.56
2
4.9
9
0.0
4
0.0
31
.35
0.3
71
.96
20
.40
19
.10
2
9.1
05
.00
58
.10
60
.60
28
2.9
02
60
.30
He
ad
en
d*
0.5
5
23
.81
0
.04
0
.03
1.4
00
.37
2.1
77
.30
16
.00
3
1.0
06
.90
63
.10
61
.10
27
9.0
02
52
.30
Sm
ith
field
sam
ple
0.4
02
5.9
50
.05
0.0
31.3
40.2
61.9
51
3.6
01
4.2
02
6.4
03.5
06
0.6
05
8.7
02
97
.00
25
7.8
0
*Not
mean
s, b
ut
actu
al
resu
lts
44
7
Ta
ble
63
: X
-ra
y f
luore
scen
ce e
lem
en
t re
sult
s fo
r ka
nga
roo g
ravesi
tes.
Sit
e
Mg
S
i P
S
K
C
a
Fe
N
i C
u
Zn
B
r R
b
Sr
Zr
Ba
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
µg/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
Sit
e 1
7m
E
0.3
5
24
.90
0
.03
0
.04
0.8
90
.39
1.0
64
.40
7.7
0
17
.55
.10
31
.80
45
.40
19
8.6
01
43
.60
7m
W
0.3
4
23
.21
0
.03
0
.06
0.8
60
.53
1.0
78
.40
5.4
0
16
.00
6.2
03
3.0
05
3.4
01
95
.40
13
6.6
0
4m
E
0.3
6
25
.03
0
.02
0
.05
0.8
90
.50
1.1
02
.40
8.3
0
16
.60
5.9
03
2.9
05
2.8
01
95
.00
12
5.4
0
4m
N
0.3
1
23
.19
0
.02
0
.05
0.7
80
.54
1.0
12
.30
9.0
0
14
.00
5.3
02
8.5
04
7.8
01
74
.80
12
9.6
0
4m
SE
0
.40
2
3.2
9
0.0
3
0.0
51
.00
0.5
21
.32
13
.20
13
.50
2
0.1
08
.50
38
.00
60
.80
20
4.6
01
37
.10
4m
W
0.4
3
22
.51
0
.03
0
.05
0.9
30
.51
1.2
96
.60
9.2
0
17
.50
8.6
03
8.9
05
6.0
01
91
.90
14
0.5
0
1m
E
0.3
4
22
.88
0
.03
0
.05
0.9
30
.67
1.2
02
.10
13
.10
1
7.7
05
.90
35
.60
67
.60
19
4.1
01
59
.20
1m
N
0.4
4
22
.38
0
.03
0
.06
0.9
10
.78
1.2
63
.90
9.3
0
22
.80
7.4
03
6.0
07
4.4
01
95
.10
14
7.6
0
1m
S
0.6
5
19
.16
0
.03
0
.05
0.9
91
.73
1.4
85
.90
9.8
0
22
.00
15
.80
40
.90
11
7.3
01
79
.40
14
4.4
0
1m
W
0.6
1
20
.28
0
.03
0
.06
1.0
01
.37
1.4
39
.10
6.7
0
19
.60
11
.20
41
.00
10
6.7
01
86
.50
14
7.0
0
Ce
ntr
e
0.7
3
18
.83
0
.03
0
.06
0.8
92
.95
1.3
78
.10
9.6
0
19
.10
27
.00
39
.90
20
3.2
01
61
.70
14
7.1
0
Sit
e 2
7m
E
0.2
4
23
.93
0
.03
0
.04
0.8
10
.31
1.0
1<
0.8
03
.80
1
2.5
04
.70
28
.80
39
.60
18
1.5
01
19
.30
7m
W
0.3
1
23
.17
0
.03
0
.06
0.9
30
.55
1.2
04
.20
9.2
0
18
.60
8.4
03
6.7
05
8.7
01
95
.20
12
9.0
0
4m
E
0.2
6
23
.28
0
.03
0
.06
0.8
30
.56
1.1
4<
0.8
01
5.5
0
17
.70
8.0
03
2.9
06
1.7
01
75
.50
12
9.7
0
4m
NW
0
.45
2
1.3
5
0.0
3
0.0
40
.93
0.6
01
.35
1.2
07
.10
1
9.3
01
0.1
03
6.9
05
9.1
02
00
.10
13
9.7
0
4m
S
0.3
0
25
.19
0
.03
0
.04
0.8
60
.36
1.1
78
.70
3.9
0
19
.70
3.8
03
6.0
04
2.8
01
98
.60
13
2.0
0
4m
W
0.3
3
23
.76
0
.03
0
.04
0.8
40
.64
1.2
22
.40
8.4
0
20
.30
4.7
03
5.5
05
1.5
02
07
.50
14
5.6
0
1m
E
0.4
0
21
.59
0
.03
0
.05
0.9
50
.53
1.3
5<
0.8
07
.80
1
8.3
08
.70
39
.10
63
.00
18
9.9
01
48
.00
1m
N
0.3
5
23
.21
0
.03
0
.06
0.9
20
.78
1.2
34
.10
4.6
0
22
.20
8.9
03
5.9
07
2.1
01
81
.80
13
9.5
0
1m
S
0.5
5
19
.06
0
.03
0
.05
0.9
23
.01
1.3
7<
0.8
06
.40
1
7.9
01
0.5
03
8.8
01
21
.60
18
7.2
01
47
.30
1m
W
0.4
3
24
.17
0
.03
0
.05
0.9
60
.69
1.3
11
.20
6.0
0
20
.50
6.9
03
8.1
06
1.5
02
11
.70
14
0.2
0
Ce
ntr
e
0.5
8
19
.72
0
.03
0
.05
1.0
02
.14
1.4
95
.50
10
.10
2
1.7
01
2.3
03
8.7
01
01
.30
16
5.2
01
42
.50
44
8
Sit
e
Mg
S
i P
S
K
C
a
Fe
N
i C
u
Zn
B
r R
b
Sr
Zr
Ba
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
µg/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
Sit
e 3
7m
E
0.1
7
23
.67
0
.03
0
.06
0.7
70
.50
0.8
0<
0.8
06
.90
1
2.9
07
.20
23
.00
38
.60
15
0.0
01
18
.40
7m
W
0.3
4
20
.52
0
.05
0
.12
0.9
21
.23
1.1
72
.40
10
.60
2
1.5
01
5.6
03
4.7
08
3.4
01
67
.60
12
1.3
0
4m
E
0.2
2
24
.07
0
.04
0
.08
0.7
80
.55
0.9
33
.10
11
.00
1
1.9
09
.30
27
.20
49
.00
19
9.2
01
06
.30
4m
N
0.0
9
26
.11
0
.03
0
.06
0.6
50
.37
0.6
41
.40
3.7
0
15
.00
5.8
01
8.5
03
2.5
01
28
.70
10
4.1
0
4m
S
0.5
4
21
.13
0
.02
0
.06
1.0
20
.85
1.5
01
2.1
04
.70
2
3.2
01
1.4
04
0.7
07
2.5
01
92
.30
14
5.8
0
4m
W
0.4
3
20
.89
0
.04
0
.09
0.9
41
.07
1.2
4<
0.8
01
2.2
0
17
.90
15
.60
35
.50
78
.30
16
3.5
01
31
.10
1m
E
0.3
1
23
.48
0
.03
0
.05
0.7
40
.98
0.7
59
.80
7.9
0
18
.90
7.4
02
1.0
05
5.0
01
33
.00
11
1.7
0
1m
N
0.2
2
24
.58
0
.03
0
.06
0.7
20
.79
0.7
4<
0.8
06
.60
1
4.4
05
.70
21
.60
48
.50
14
8.3
01
11
.40
1m
S
0.6
1
18
.79
0
.03
0
.06
0.7
93
.71
1.0
55
.00
8.1
0
19
.80
14
.20
29
.70
13
0.9
01
56
.90
11
8.2
0
1m
W
0.3
4
23
.48
0
.04
0
.09
0.8
30
.77
0.9
81
.80
8.8
0
23
.00
9.5
03
0.1
06
5.0
01
90
.10
11
2.0
0
Ce
ntr
e
0.6
9
18
.58
0
.03
0
.06
0.7
44
.78
0.9
76
.30
13
.70
1
9.4
01
3.7
02
7.3
01
72
.20
14
6.3
01
10
.70
Sam
ple
0.6
1
18
.27
0
.03
0
.05
1.0
43
.25
1.4
25
.80
11
.20
2
2.7
01
9.2
04
1.6
01
08
.00
17
4.3
01
46
.40
Sam
ple
0.0
9
24
.35
0
.03
0
.04
0.7
10
.25
0.7
05
.80
10
.90
1
8.5
02
.80
20
.60
28
.80
13
1.9
09
6.7
0
Sam
ple
0.3
8
21
.74
0
.06
0
.11
0.9
11
.31
1.0
74
.40
9.9
0
23
.70
13
.30
32
.50
63
.70
16
0.8
01
15
.80
Sam
ple
0.3
3
23
.02
0
.03
0
.05
0.9
40
.46
1.1
51
.30
9.4
0
16
.00
11
.10
35
.00
53
.50
17
7.5
01
30
.00
Th
e c
odin
g f
or
the loca
tion
s fr
om
wh
ich
th
e s
oil s
am
ple
s w
ere
taken
are
desc
ribed in
term
s of
their
dis
tan
ce
from
th
e c
en
tre o
f ea
ch g
ravesi
te. T
here
fore
“7
m W
” m
ea
ns
7 m
ete
rs w
est
of
the c
en
tre o
f th
e g
rave a
nd
“1
m S
” m
ea
ns
1 m
ete
r so
uth
of
the c
en
tre o
f th
e g
rave. “C
en
tre”
mea
ns
the c
en
tre o
f th
e g
rave.
44
9
Ta
ble
6
4: X
-ra
y f
luore
scen
ce e
lem
en
t re
sult
s fo
r p
ig g
ravesi
tes.
Sit
e
Mg
S
i P
S
K
C
a
Fe
N
i C
u
Zn
B
r R
b
Sr
Zr
Ba
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
Pig
1
7m
E
0.3
8
23
.09
0
.03
0
.05
0.9
60
.45
1.2
43
.40
9.6
0
18
.30
5.8
03
5.7
05
2.5
01
81
.70
11
6.7
0
7m
W
0.1
0
27
.75
0
.02
0
.03
0.6
50
.24
0.6
6<
0.8
04
.00
1
3.2
0<
0.4
02
0.7
02
7.3
01
67
.50
10
9.4
0
4m
S
0.3
8
24
.47
0
.04
0
.07
0.8
70
.54
1.1
92
.00
9.5
0
23
.00
7.3
03
5.1
05
3.3
01
67
.60
13
5.1
0
4m
E
0.6
4
22
.88
0
.04
0
.08
0.8
62
.36
1.2
4<
0.8
01
1.4
0
21
.90
19
.10
37
.20
13
8.7
01
55
.10
13
8.6
0
4m
N
0.2
6
26
.31
0
.03
0
.06
0.7
10
.49
0.7
7<
0.8
09
.20
1
6.7
03
.90
23
.90
37
.10
13
7.5
01
09
.60
4m
W
0.2
2
25
.61
0
.02
0
.03
0.7
30
.25
0.8
03
.60
5.8
0
15
.40
1.6
02
2.6
02
8.4
01
62
.00
11
0.4
0
1m
E
0.4
6
25
.72
0
.02
0
.04
0.8
70
.59
1.1
21
.60
6.5
0
15
.30
4.8
03
4.3
04
6.0
01
87
.70
13
4.8
0
1m
N
0.2
9
27
.24
0
.02
0
.04
0.7
60
.38
0.9
75
.00
8.5
0
16
.40
4.2
02
9.3
03
8.0
01
82
.80
12
4.0
0
1m
S
0.3
7
28
.10
0
.02
0
.04
0.8
20
.49
1.0
35
.30
9.9
0
17
.40
4.1
03
3.7
04
3.5
01
86
.30
12
5.2
0
1m
W
0.3
3
26
.75
0
.02
0
.03
0.7
80
.48
0.9
66
.00
7.4
0
16
.60
2.5
02
9.1
03
8.3
01
80
.80
11
9.8
0
Ce
ntr
e
0.2
0
15
.19
0
.05
0
.05
0.9
62
.50
1.2
81
2.6
08
.30
2
1.3
09
.50
34
.80
77
.00
17
6.3
01
38
.00
Pig
2
7m
W
0.1
5
29
.78
0
.01
0
.02
0.5
60
.20
0.5
8<
0.8
07
.30
1
4.5
0<
0.4
01
8.6
02
5.0
01
59
.50
11
3.5
0
4m
N
0.3
6
24
.56
0
.03
0
.06
0.8
90
.56
1.0
34
.90
11
.60
1
7.4
07
.80
32
.50
48
.80
16
8.8
01
20
.90
4m
W
0.2
0
27
.47
0
.02
0
.03
0.6
60
.32
0.7
32
.30
6.8
0
17
.90
< 0
.40
23
.80
30
.70
15
8.1
01
11
.60
4m
E
0.3
3
21
.14
0
.04
0
.06
0.9
80
.53
1.3
02
.70
11
.20
2
0.5
04
.90
35
.70
55
.60
17
4.4
01
66
.70
1m
E
0.4
3
23
.59
0
.03
0
.06
0.9
60
.68
1.1
6<
0.8
01
2.7
0
18
.10
8.6
03
3.2
05
3.9
01
58
.50
12
1.9
0
1m
N
0.3
4
24
.32
0
.04
0
.07
0.8
90
.61
1.0
32
.60
4.4
0
16
.60
8.3
03
1.3
05
1.5
01
74
.70
11
6.7
0
1m
S
0.4
1
24
.44
0
.03
0
.05
0.9
20
.53
1.2
13
.80
11
.30
1
9.0
07
.20
35
.70
50
.10
17
3.2
01
27
.30
1m
W
0.3
5
24
.47
0
.03
0
.06
0.8
50
.57
1.0
4<
0.8
07
.30
1
9.2
05
.30
30
.80
50
.60
17
3.1
01
12
.80
Ce
ntr
e
0.5
1
18
.38
0
.08
0
.06
1.0
52
.01
1.3
66
.50
15
.00
2
7.7
09
.60
36
.60
78
.40
17
0.5
01
60
.00
45
0
Sit
e
Mg
S
i P
S
K
C
a
Fe
N
i C
u
Zn
B
r R
b
Sr
Zr
Ba
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
Pig
3
7m
E
0.2
6
24
.48
0
.03
0
.05
0.8
60
.40
0.9
61
.80
0.8
0
21
.30
4.4
02
9.2
04
3.1
01
64
.30
12
1.0
0
4m
E
0.2
9
24
.89
0
.03
0
.06
0.8
50
.44
1.0
64
.10
16
.40
1
7.6
05
.80
30
.70
49
.50
18
9.6
01
29
.00
4m
S
0.3
5
22
.97
0
.03
0
.07
0.8
00
.53
1.0
1<
0.8
01
0.0
0
17
.20
11
.10
30
.00
56
.80
17
0.0
01
18
.60
4m
W
0.4
0
21
.89
0
.03
0
.06
0.9
60
.58
1.2
68
.90
6.8
0
21
.80
8.7
03
7.3
05
6.1
01
74
.70
13
9.6
0
1m
E
0.4
5
21
.87
0
.04
0
.08
0.8
90
.79
1.1
57
.10
9.3
0
25
.50
16
.10
33
.60
81
.90
16
2.3
01
22
.70
1m
N
0.3
9
23
.93
0
.03
0
.06
0.9
00
.56
1.1
63
.10
10
.20
1
5.3
09
.30
32
.90
64
.90
17
3.3
01
20
.40
1m
S
0.3
0
24
.21
0
.03
0
.06
0.8
40
.46
1.0
86
.30
9.2
0
15
.50
9.5
03
4.7
05
8.8
01
75
.50
11
5.1
0
1m
W
0.3
1
22
.87
0
.04
0
.07
0.8
40
.52
1.0
51
.50
12
.70
1
4.0
01
1.3
03
0.1
05
7.1
01
69
.60
11
9.2
0
Ce
ntr
e
0.3
8
22
.82
0
.04
0
.06
0.8
60
.43
1.2
01
0.9
04
.80
2
0.0
09
.80
35
.70
59
.20
16
1.3
01
10
.50
Sam
ple
s
Sam
ple
0.2
8
20
.60
0
.04
0
.06
0.8
90
.42
1.0
81
1.8
07
.50
1
8.6
04
.10
30
.70
42
.80
19
1.3
01
65
.60
Sam
ple
0.1
2
28
.39
0
.02
0
.03
0.5
80
.24
0.5
51
.60
3.2
0
14
.20
< 0
.40
19
.20
27
.20
14
5.6
01
07
.70
45
1
Ta
ble
65
: X
-ra
y f
luore
scen
ce e
lem
en
t re
sult
s fo
r h
um
an
gra
vesi
te 1
.
Sit
e
Mg
A
l S
i P
S
K
C
a
Fe
N
i C
u
Zn
B
r R
b
Sr
Zr
Ba
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
µg/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
µ
g/g
Ea
st
En
d o
f g
rave
0
.40
4
.40
2
5.6
8
0.0
40
.03
1.3
20
.26
1.7
31
.70
13
.70
2
6.9
03
.10
55
.00
58
.60
29
0.8
02
53
.60
Fe
et
0.5
6
5.1
5
24
.99
0
.04
0.0
31
.35
0.3
71
.96
20
.40
19
.10
2
9.1
05
.00
58
.10
60
.60
28
2.9
02
60
.30
He
ad
0.5
5
5.1
3
23
.81
0
.04
0.0
31
.40
0.3
72
.17
7.3
01
6.0
0
31
.00
6.9
06
3.1
06
1.1
02
79
.00
25
2.3
0
Sam
ple
Sam
ple
0.4
0
4.7
0
25
.95
0
.05
0.0
31
.34
0.2
61
.95
13
.60
14
.20
2
6.4
03
.50
60
.60
58
.70
29
7.0
02
57
.80
Sam
ple
0.4
4
4.9
7
24
.60
0
.05
0.0
31
.37
0.2
92
.04
1.1
01
5.4
0
25
.60
5.9
06
3.6
05
9.3
02
91
.60
25
2.5
0
Sam
ple
0.3
7
4.6
2
25
.66
0
.04
0.0
31
.33
0.2
41
.81
1.4
01
4.8
0
25
.20
3.4
05
7.5
05
5.6
02
75
.10
25
4.1
0
REFERENCES
Allanson, A. 2004 ‘Soursob; sour by name, sour by nature and souring our bushland’, Releaf, June 2004, Trees for Life, South Australia.
Aries, P. 1974, Western Attitudes Towards Death: From the Middle Ages to the Present, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Australian Institute of Criminology, 2005 Crime Facts Info, no. 108, 11 October, 2005, Canberra, Australia.
Bass, W. 1987, ‘Forensic Anthropology: the American Experience’, in Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science, eds A. Boddington, A.N. Garland, and R.C. Janaway, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 224 –239.
Bass, W. 1997, ‘Outdoor Decomposition Rates in Tennessee’ in ForensicTaphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, eds W.D. Haglund, and M. H. Sorg, CRC Press, USA, pp.181- 186.
Beck, L.A. 1982, ‘Anthropology and Criminal Forensics – A Growing Alliance’, Criminal Justice Review, vol. 7, no.1, pp. 1- 10.
Bethell, P.H. and Carver, M.O.H. 1987, ‘Detection and enhancement of decayed inhumations at Sutton Hoo’, in Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science, eds A. Boddington, A.N. Garland, and R.C. Janaway, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 10- 21.
Bevan, B.W. 1991, ‘The Search for Graves’, Geophysics, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1310- 1319.
Binford, L. R. 1981, Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths, Academic Press, New York.
Bock, J.H. and Norris, D.O. 1997, ‘Forensic Botany: An Under- Utilized Resource’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 364- 347.
Boddington, A., Garland, A.N., and Janaway, R.C. (eds) 1987, Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science,Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Bossard, A. and Negrier- Dormont, L. 2000, ‘Profiling Serial Killers’, International Crime Police Review , pp. 481: 25- 29.
453
Boyd, R.M. 1979, ‘Buried Body Cases’, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 1- 6.
Brothwell, D.R. 1965, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment and Study of Human Skeletal Remains, William Clowes and Sons Limited, London.
Buck, S.C. 2003, ‘Searching for Graves Using Geophysical Technology: Field Tests with Ground Penetrating Radar, Magnetometry, and Electrical Resistivity’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 5- 11.
Burton, J.A., Price, T.D., Cahue, L., and Wright, L.E. 2003, ‘The Use of Barium and Strontium Abundances in Human Skeletal Tissues to Determine their Geographic Origins’, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, vol. 13, pp. 88- 95.
Butzer, K. W. 1982, Archaeology as Human Ecology: Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Byers, S. N. 2002, Introduction to Forensic Anthropology, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, USA.
Carter, D.O. and Tibbett, M. 2003, ‘Taphonomic Mycota: Fungi with Forensic Potential’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 168-171.
Chamberlain, A. 1994, Interpreting the Past: Human Remains, British Museum Press, London.
Chamberlain, A.T. and Pearson, M.P. 2001, Earthly Remains: The History and Science of Preserved Human Bodies, British Museum Press, London.
Chapman, R. 1987, ‘Mortuary Practices: Society, Theory Building and Archaeology’ in Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science, eds A. Boddington, A.N. Garland, and R.C. Janaway, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Cockroft, B. and Martin, F.M. 1981, ‘Irrigation’, in Red- Brown Earths of Australia, eds J.M. Oades, D.G Lewis and K. Norrish, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, University of Adelaide and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organsiation Division of Soils, South Australia, pp.133 – 148.
Collier, C.D. Abby 2003, ‘Tradition, Modernity, and Postmodernity in Symbolism of Death’, Sociological Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 727- 749.
454
Cox, M. and Bell, L. 1999, ‘Recovery of Human Skeletal Elements from a Recent UK Murder Inquiry: Preservational Signatures’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 945- 950.
Crooks, M. 2005, ‘Conversations with a Killer’, Who, January, pp. 50- 52.
Davenport, G.C. 2001, ‘Remote Sensing Applications in Forensic Investigations’, Historical Archaeology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 87- 100.
David, A. and Linford, N. 2000, ‘Physics and Archaeology’, Physics World,May, pp. 27- 31.
Davis, J.L., Heginbottom, J.A., Anman, A.P., Daniels, R.S., Berdal, B.P., Bergan, T., Duncan, K.E., Lewin, P.K., Oxford, J.S., Roberts, N., Skehel, J.J., and Smith, C.R. 2000, ‘Ground Penetrating Radar Surveys to Locate 1918 Spanish Flu Victims in Permafrost’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 68- 76.
Department of Environment and Heritage, 2003, State of the Environment Report for South Australia: Supplementary Report, South Australia.
Dirkmaat, D.C. and Adovasio, J.M. 1997, ‘The Role of Archaeology in the Recovery and Interpretation of Human Remains from an Outdoor Forensic Setting’ in Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, eds W.D. Haglund, and M. H. Sorg, CRC Press, USA, pp. 39- 64.
Duncan, J. 1983, ‘Search Techniques’ in Handbook of Forensic Archaeology and Anthropology, eds D. Morse, J. Duncan and J. Stoutamire, Florida State University Foundation, Florida, pp. 4- 19.
Ebert, J.I. 1984, ‘Remote Sensing Applications in Archaeology’ in Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory Volume 7, ed. M.B. Schiffer, Academic Press, Florida, pp. 293- 361.
Edward, J.B. and Benfer, R.A. 1993, ‘The effects of diagenesis on the Paloma skeletal material’ in Investigations of Ancient Human Tissue: Chemical Analyses in Anthropology, ed. M. Sandford, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eldridge, D.J. and Kinnell, P.I.A. 1997, ‘Assessment of erosion rates from microphyte- dominated calcareous soils under rain- impacted flow’, Australian Journal of Soil Research, vol. 32, pp. 475- 489.
Emsley, J. 1991 The Elements, 2nd edn, Clarendon, Oxford.
455
Fifth Australasian Remote Sensing Conference Proceedings, Perth, Western Australia, 8- 12 October, 1990.
Fischer, P.M. 1980, ‘Applications of Technical Devices in Archaeology: The Use of X- Rays, Electrical and Electro- Magnetic Devices and Subsurface Interface Radar’, in Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology Volume LX111,P. Astroms Forlag, Goteborg, Sweden.
France, D.L., Griffin, T.J., Swanburg, J.G., Lindeman, J.W., Davenport, G.C., Trammell, V., Armhurst, C.T., Kondratieff, B., Nelson, A., Castellano, K., and Hopkins, D. 1992, ‘A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Detection of Clandestine Graves’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1445-1458.
France, D.L., Griffin, T.J., Swanburg, J.G., Lindeman, J.W., Davenport, G.C., Trammell, V., Travis, C., Kondratieff, B., Nelson, A., Castellano, K., Hopkins, D., and Adair, T. 1997, ‘Necrosearch Revisited: Further Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Detection of Clandestine Graves’ in Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, eds W.D. Haglund, and M. H. Sorg, CRC Press, USA, pp. 497- 509.
Frazier, C.H., Cadalli, N., Munson Jnr, D.C., and O’Brien, W.D. 2000, ‘Acoustic Imaging of Objects Buried in Soil’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 147 – 156.
Freeland, R.S., Miller, M.L., Yoder, R.E., and Koppenjan, S.K. 2003, ‘Forensic Application of FM- CW and Pulse Radar’, Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, June 8, no. 2, pp. 97- 108.
French, R.J. 1981, ‘Management under low rainfall: South Australia’ in Red- Brown Earths of Australia, eds J.M. Oades, D.G Lewis and K. Norrish, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, University of Adelaide and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Orgnaisation Division of Soils, South Australia, pp. 97- 116.
Galloway, A., Birkby, W.H., Jones, A.M., Henry, T.E., and Parks, B. 1989, ‘Decay Rates of Human Remains in an Arid Environment’, AustralianJournal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 34, pp. 607- 616.
Garland, A.N. 1987, ‘A Histological Study of Archaeological Bone Decomposition’ in Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science, eds A. Boddington, A.N. Garland, and R.C. Janaway, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 109- 126.
Garland, A.N. and Janaway, R.C. 1989, ‘The Taphonomy of Inhumation Burials’ in Burial Archaeology: Current Research, Methods and
456
Developments, eds C.A. Roberts, F. Lee and J. Bintiff, BAR British Series 211, England, pp. 15- 37.
Geberth, V.J. 1983, Practical Homicide Investigation: Tactics, Procedures, and Forensic Techniques, Elsevier, New York.
Gibbon, G. 1939, Anthropological Archaeology, 1984 edn, Columbia University Press, New York.
Godwin, M. and Canter, D. 1997, ‘Encounter and Death: The Spatial Behaviour of US Serial Killers’, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategy and Management, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 24- 38.
Goffer, Z. 1980, Archaeological Chemistry: A Source Book on the Applications of Chemistry to Archaeology, Wiley, New York.
Gray, H. (author), Williams, P.L., Bannister, L.H., Berry, M.M., Collins, P., Dyson, M., Dussek, J.E., Ferguson, M.W.J. (eds), 1995, Gray’s Anatomy, 38th
edn, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.
Haglund, W.D. and Sorg, M. H. 1997, ‘Method and Theory of Forensic Taphonomic Research’ in Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, eds W.D. Haglund, and M. H. Sorg, CRC Press, USA, pp. 13- 26.
Haglund, W.D. and Sorg, M. H. (eds) 1997, Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, CRC Press, USA.
Haglund, W.D. 1997, ‘Dogs and Coyotes: Postmortem Involvement with Human Remains’ in Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, eds W.D. Haglund, and M. H. Sorg, CRC Press, USA, pp. 367- 381.
Hammon III, W. S., McMechan, G.A., and Zeng, X. 2000, ‘Forensic GPR: finite- difference simulations of responses from buried human remains’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 45, pp. 171- 186.
Hardesty, D.L. 1941, Ecological Anthropology, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Haviland, W. A. 1987, Cultural Anthropology, 5th edn, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York.
Healing, T. D., Hoffman, P.N., and Young, S.E.J. 1995 ‘The Infection Hazards of Human Cadavers’, Communicable Disease Report, vol. 5, no. 5, 28 April, pp. R61- R68.
457
Henderson, J. 1987, ‘Factors Determining the State of Preservation of Human Remains’, in Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science, eds A. Boddington, A.N. Garland, and R.C. Janaway, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 43- 54.
Henderson, M., Henderson, P., and Keirnan, C. 2000, ‘Missing persons: Incidence, Issues and Impacts’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 144, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
Heizer, R. F. (ed) 1959, The Archaeologist at Work: A Source Book in Archaeological Method and Interpretation, Harper and Brothers, Publishers, New York.
Hole, F. and Heizer, R.F. 1965, An Introduction to Prehistoric Archaeology,3rd edn, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York.
Hoshower, L. M. 1998, ‘Forensic archaeology and the need for flexible excavation strategies: a case study’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 53- 56.
Hoving, G. 1986, ‘Buried Body Search Technology’, Identification News,February, pp. 3- 15.
Hunter, J. and Martin, A.L. 1996, ‘Locating Buried Remains’ in Studies in Crime: An Introduction to Forensic Archaeology, Hunter, J., Roberts, C. and Martin, A., Routledge, London, pp. 88- 100.
Hunter, J., Roberts, C., and Martin, A. 1996, Studies in Crime: An Introduction to Forensic Archaeology, Routledge, London.
Imaizumi, M. 1974, ‘Locating Buried Bodies’, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 2- 5.
Janaway, R.C. 1996, ‘The Decay of Buried Human Remains and their Associated Materials’ in Studies in Crime: An Introduction to Forensic Archaeology, Hunter, J., Roberts, C. and Martin, A., Routledge, London, pp. 58- 85.
Janaway, R.C. 1987, ‘The preservation of organic materials in association with metal artifacts deposited in inhumation graves’ in Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science, eds A. Boddington, A.N. Garland, and R.C. Janaway, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 127- 148.
458
Kanable, R. 2000, ‘Earth’s Clues: Outside Experts and Geophysical Techniques Help Locate Clandestine Gravesites’, Law Enforcement Technology, vol. 27, no. 27, pp. 40 – 44.
Keeley, H.C.M., Hudson, G.E., and Evans, J. 1977, ‘Trace Element Contents of Human Bones in Various States of Preservation’, Journal of Archaeological Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 19- 24.
Killam, E. W. 1990, The Detection of Human Remains, Charles C. Thomas, Illinois.
Kocsis, R.N. 2000, ‘Offender Profiling in Police Investigations – Beneficial or B.S.?’, Australian Police Journal, March, pp. 42- 46.
Kocsis, R.N. 2000, ‘New Techniques in Geographic Offender Profiling of Serial Crimes’, Victoria Police Association Journal, June, pp. 20- 23.
Komar, D.A. 1998, ‘Decay Rates in a Cold Climate Region: A Review of Cases Involving Advanced Decomposition from the Medical Examiner’s Office in Edmonton, Alberta’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 57- 61.
Krogman, W.M. and I can, M.Y. 1986, The Human Skeleton in Forensic
Medicine, Charles C. Thomas, Illinois, U.S.A.
Lamp, C. and Collett, F. 1976, A Field Guide to Weeds in Australia, Inkata Press, Melbourne.
Lindemann, J.W. 2000, ‘Forensic Geology: The Example of Professional contribution to Necrosearch International’, The Professional Geologist, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 4- 7.
Long, A. and von Strokirch, T. 2003, Lost but not forgotten: A guide to methods of identifying Aboriginal Unmarked Graves, New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, Australia.
Lord, W. D. and Goff, M. Lee, 1994 Forensic Entomology: Insects in the Investigation of Crime, American Journal of Forensic Medical Pathology,15(1): 109- 117
L’Oste- Brown, S., Goodwin, L., and Yelf, R. 1996, ‘Taroom Aboriginal Reserve Cemeteries: Their History and Investigation’, Tempus, no. 6, pp. 207- 218.
459
L’Oste- Brown, S., Godwin, L., and Morwood, M. 2002, ‘Aboriginal bark burial: 700 years of mortuary tradition in the Central Queensland Highlands’, Australian Aboriginal Studies, vol. 1, pp. 43- 50.
McGregor, D.M., Wood, W.B., and Brecknell, D.J. 1996, ‘Soil Accumulation of By- Products of Tissue Decomposition and Time Since Death’, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 28, pp. 67- 71.
McLaughlin, J.E. 1974, The Detection of Buried Bodies, Andermac, Yuba City, California.
McManamon, F.P. 1984, ‘Discovering Sites Unseen’, in Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory Volume 7, ed. M.B. Schiffer, Academic Press, Florida, pp. 223- 292.
Mann, R. W., Bass, W. M., and Meadows, L. 1990, ‘Time Since Death and Decomposition of the Human Body: Variables and Observations in Case and Experimental Field Studies’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 103- 111.
Mant, A.K. 1987, ‘Knowledge Acquired from Post- War Exhumations’, in Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science, eds A. Boddington, A.N. Garland, and R.C. Janaway, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 65- 80.
Maples, W.R. and Browning, M. 1994, Dead Men Do Tell Tales, Arrow Books, London.
Mellett, J. S. 1992, ‘Location of Human Remains with Ground Penetrating Radar’, Fourth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar,Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 16, pp. 359- 365.
Metcalf, P. and Huntington, R. 1991, Celebrations of Death: The Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Miller, M. L. 2002, Coupling Ground Penetrating Radar Applications with Continually Changing Decomposing Human Targets: An Effort to Enhance Search Strategies of Buried Human Remains, Masters thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Miller, P.S. 1996, ‘Disturbances in the Soil: Finding Buried Bodies and Other Evidence Using Ground Penetrating Radar’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 648- 652.
460
Morse, D., Duncan, J., and Stoutamire, J. (eds) 1983, Handbook of Forensic Archeology and Anthropology, Florida State University Foundation, Florida.
Murad, T.A. 1997, ‘The Utilization of Faunal Evidence in the Recovery of Human Remains’ in Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, eds W.D. Haglund, and M. H. Sorg, CRC Press, USA, pp. 395- 404.
Mykyta, A. 1980, It’s a Long Way to Truro, The Dominion Press, Melbourne, Australia.
Neubauer, W. 2001, ‘Images of the invisible- prospection methods for the documentation of threatened archaeological sites’, Naturwissenschaften,vol. 88, pp. 13- 24.
New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service 2003, Lost but not forgotten: A guide to methods of identifying Aboriginal unmarked graves,New South Wales.
Nobes, D.C. 1999, ‘Geophysical Surveys of Burial Sites: A Case Study of the Oaro Urupa’, Geophysics, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 357- 367.
Nobes, D.C. 2000, ‘The Search for “Yvonne”: A Case Example of the Delineation of a Grave Using Near- Surface Geophysical Methods’, Journalof Forensic Sciences, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 715- 721.
Owsley, D. W. 1995, ‘Techniques for Locating Burials, with Emphasis on the Probe’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 735- 740.
Pate, F.D. 1997, ‘Bone Collagen Diagenesis at Roonka Flat, South Australia: Implications for Isotopic Analysis’, Archaeology in Oceania, vol. 32, pp. 170- 175.
Pate, F.D. and Hutton, J.T. 1988, ‘The Use of Soil Chemistry Data to Address Post- Mortem Diagenesis in Bone Mineral’, Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 15, pp. 729- 739.
Pate, F.D., Hutton, J.T., and Norrish, K. 1989, ‘Ionic Exchange Between Soil Solution and Bone: Towards a Predictive Model’, Applied Geochemistry,vol. 4, pp. 303- 316.
Peirce, J.R. 1997, ‘The biology of Australian weeds: 31. Oxalis pes- capraeL.’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 110- 119.
Pendick, D. 1998, ‘Dig This’, New Scientist, September 19, pp. 34- 37.
461
Pfeiffer, S., Milne, S., and Stevenson, R.M. 1998, ‘The Natural Decomposition of Adipocere’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 368- 370.
Pickering, R.B. and Bachman, D.C. 1997, The Use of Forensic Anthropology, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida.
Pinto, S. and Wilson, P. 1990, ‘Serial Murder’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 25, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
Powell, K. 2004, ‘Detecting Buried Human Remains Using Near- Surface Geophysical Instruments’, Exploration Geophysics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 88-92.
Queensland Police Service, 1999, Police Dog Squad, Human Remains Detection Training Manual (Unpublished internal document).
Radosevich, S. C. 1993, ‘The Six Deadly Sins of Trace Element Analysis: A case of Wishful Thinking’ in Investigations of Ancient Human Tissue: Chemical Analyses in Anthropology, ed. M. Sandford, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 269- 332.
Rees, M., Condit, R., Crawley, M., Pacala, S. and Tilman, D. 2001, ‘Long-Term Studies of Vegetation Dynamics’, Science, vol. 293, 27 July, pp. 650–654.
Reichs, K.J. 1992, ‘Forensic Anthropology in the 1990s’, American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 146- 153.
Rentoul, E. and Smith, H. 1973, Glaister’s Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology, 13th edn, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.
Rodriguez, W. and Bass, W. M. 1985, ‘Decomposition of Buried Bodies and Methods that may aid in their Location’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 836- 852.
Rowell, D.L. 1994, Soil Science: Methods and Applications, Addison, Wesley, Longman Limited, United Kingdom.
Sandford, M. 1993 “Understanding the Biogenic- Diagenetic Coninuum: Interpreting Elemental Concentrations of Archaeological Bone” in Investigations of Ancient Human Tissue: Chemical Analyses in Anthropology, ed. M. Sandford, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 1- 48.
462
Scanvic, J. 1997, Aerospatial Remote Sensing in Geology, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield.
Schultz, J.J., Falsetti, A.B., Collins, M., Koppenjan, S.K., and Warren, M. 2002, ‘The Detection of Forensic Burials in Florida Using GPR’, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Ground Penetrating Radar, Santa Barbara.
Schwartz, J.H. 1993, What the Bones Tell Us, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Scollar, I., Tabbagh, A., Hesse A., and Herzog, I. 1990, ArchaeologicalProspecting and Remote Sensing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Skinner, M. and Lazenby, R.A. 1993, Found! Human Remains: a field manual for the discovery of the recent human skeleton, Archaeology Press, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.
Snell, K.D.M. 2003, ‘Gravestones, Belonging and Local Attachment in England’, Past and Present, vol. 179, May, pp. 97- 134.
Spennemann, D.H.R. and Franke, B. 1995, ‘Archaeological Techniques for Exhumations: A Unique Data Source for Crime Scene Investigations’, Forensic Science International, vol. 74, pp. 5- 15.
Spriggs, J.A. 1989, ‘On and Off- Site Conservation of Bone’ in BurialArchaeology: Current Research, Methods and Developments, eds C.A. Roberts, F. Lee and J. Bintiff, BAR British Series 211, pp. 39 – 45.
Stanley, J. M. 1983, ‘Subsurface Survey: the Use of Magnetics in Australian Archaeology’, in Australian Field Archaeology: A Guide to Techniques, ed. G. Connah, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra, pp. 82-86.
Star, J.L., Estes, L.E., and McGuire, K.C. (eds) 1997, Integration of Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Stott, P. 1996, ‘Ground Penetrating Radar: a Technique for Investigating the Burrow Structures of Fossorial Vertebrates’, Wildlife Research, vol. 23, pp. 519- 530.
Strange, J. 2003, ‘‘Tho’ lost to sight, to memory dear’: pragmatism, sentimentality and working- class attitudes towards the grave, c.1875-1914’, Mortality, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 144- 159.
463
Swanton, B. and Wilson, P. 1989, ‘Research Brief: Missing Persons’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 17, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
Swindells, M. 1994, ‘Remaining Evidence’, Police Review, 7 October, pp. 14- 15.
Thomas, D.G. 1999, ‘Investigative Sub- Surface Search: The Pros and Cons of Some Instrumented Search Technologies Available to Police in Australia’, Australian Police Journal, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 62- 72.
Thomas, P. 1995, Talking Bones: The Science of Forensic Anthropology,Facts on File Inc., New York.
Tuck, D. 1996, A Field Guide to the Detection and Recovery of Buried Human Remains, NSW Police, Paper submitted for the Diploma in Applied Science in Forensic Investigation (NSW Police), Canberra Institute of Technology.
Turner, B. and Wiltshire, P. 1999, ‘Experimental validation of forensic evidence: a study of the decomposition of buried pigs in a heavy clay soil’, Forensic Science International, vol. 101, pp. 113- 122.
Ubelaker, D. 1997, ‘Application of Science’, International Police Review,Nov/Dec, p. 30.
Ubelaker, D. 1978, Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation, 3rd edn, Taraxacum, Washington.
Ubelaker,D. and Scammell, H. 1992, Bones: A Forensic Detective’s Casebook, M.Evans and Company, Inc., New York.
Unterberger, R.R. 1992, ‘Ground Penetrating Radar Finds Disturbed Earth Over Burials’, Fourth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 16, pp. 351- 357.
Vass, A., Barshick, S., Sega, G., Caton, J., Skeen, J.T., Love, J.C., and Synstelien, J. A. 2002, ‘Decomposition Chemistry of Human Remains: A New Methodology for Determining the Postmortem Interval’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 542- 553.
Vass, A., Bass, W.M., Wolt, J.D., Foss, J.E., and Ammons, J.T. 1992, ‘Time Since Death Determinations of Human Cadavers Using Soil Solution’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1236- 1253.
464
Waldron, T. 1987, The potential of analysis of chemical constituents of bone’, in Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science, eds A. Boddington, A.N. Garland, and R.C. Janaway, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 149- 162.
Williams, M. (ed.) 1969, South Australia from the Air, Griffin Press, Adelaide, Australia.
Woolley, L. 1949, Digging Up the Past, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.
Wright, R. 1996, ‘Uncovering Genocide, War Crimes: The Archaeological Evidence’, International Network on Holocaust and Genocide, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 8- 11.
Wu, A. H. B. and Bellantoni, N. F. 2003, ‘Stability of Cholesterol Gall Stones After 165 Years of Burial’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 633- 635.
Yoon, G. L. and Park, J. B. 2001, ‘Sensitivity of leachate and fine contents on electrical resistivity variations of sandy soils’, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. B84, pp. 147- 161.
