The Criticism

8/14/2019 The Criticism

1/12

The criticism of the story is as old as history itself early in the 15th Century, there should have been cast, who opposed the exuberant Fabulierlust thehumanists.Fame is that Lorenzo Valla, secretary of Pope Pius II Piccolomini, has allegedly unmasked in 1470, the so-called "Donation of Constantine as aforgery (Kammeier, 2000, 221 ff; Topper, 1998, 43). This instrument was allegedly sustained in the Carolingian period, in reality, certainly in the 15thCentury was created to establish secular claims of the Roman papacy.Nevertheless, the whole affair has created the impression as if aware of a document that would be discarded. Namely, so that could pass unnoticed alot of other equally crude forgeries. - And this was the case. Individual sources were withdrawn recognition of the Rest.And the story of Constantine had been rigged s till a catch: The 15th Century can not be historically situated, Lorenzo Valla, this must have been later.- In a certain sense, therefore, the exposure of this forgery itself a forgery.In the 16th Century the Spanish introduced Professor de Arcilla from the University of Salamanca in two books on the claim. that the whole of historyhad been falsified in the Middle Ages (I Fomenko, 96).Rinern from a dispute between two religious congregations, the Mau and the Jesuits over the authenticity of documents, created in the first half of the17th Century, the auxiliary sciences of Diplomacy (study of documents) and paleography (study of ancient writings) - tools with which it was hopedthat all written records of the earlier period, so the ancient and medieval times, including the Church Fathers, and the council acts, by monks of the13th Century had been falsified. Even the Greek version of the Bible is spurious. And above all, Hardouin argued that the counterfeits are not limitedto written sources, but also cover art, inscriptions and coins.Later Hardouin said to have clarified the origin time of the great forgeries and scheduled from 1350 to 1480 - from today's perspective, even asurprisingly accurate dating.Hardouin forgery thesis was very bold and caused a sensation. Several of his works were banned and he was forced to partially withdraw. But onecould refute his views not because he was one of the most familiar with the matter. Thus, only one thing remained, namely, that it was hoping thattime would make people forget his objections. This is also done.This deliberate silencing Hardouin, meanwhile, went so far that even his lexical mentions in the course of the 20th Century gradually reduced andfinally all been dumped (Lelarge, 1997). Significantly, Hardouin works have never been reprinted, but must still be used in the approximately threehundred original editions. And it was not really surprising that there are no recent secondary literature on this man, only stereotyped instructions in themanuals that speak of Hardouin "Hyperkritizismus.Still Hardouin has for the 18th Century, a certain degree prepared on the historical criticism that could use the enlightenment.Here mention must be especially Voltaire, who tirelessly the absurdities of the Bible, ancient and medieval En -based view of history as an absurd curio cabinet rejected (see, for historical thinking of Voltaire: Versailles, 1994).The 19th Century, was a huge boom in history and especially the source of criticism. Throughout the centuries of time have been collected fromvarious quarters to oppose the traditional view of history. There have been revelations of counterfeiting, especially of documents, but also from various

ancient authors. For example, a critical life of Jesus research, the Gospels and the Holy Scriptures declared generally applicable to Roman literature.The most drove the historical criticism of the British classical scholar Edwin Johnson, who in the last quarter of the 19th Century almost revolutionarydiscoveries came - two hundred years after Jean Hardouin, but after all, long before our time. During his first work, Antiqua Mater (1887) What mightstill relatively conventional, his last book, The Pauline Epistles (ie 1894) a brilliant throw and cut much more topics as its title suggests. Basically,Johnson has stated in the said work with sober clarity conclusions, for which even after more than a hundred years is not even the foundation workwas done. - So the author has realized that the history of early printing is temporary and false.Edwin Johnson's main thesis is that not all our historical sources continue, if at all) than to the year 1500, way down (see the motto. - Literally the lasthour before the transcript of a crucial chapter I'm on Johnson ge-encounter and have learned that the c laim did not dare, but is about right.Has philological side of the early 20th CenturyInvasion of the Sea Peoples to Egypt, he declared it the consequence of a geological event.Forgotten by the Revolution of 1917 until early 1990, almost in Western Europe was the Russian contribution to the history of criticism. This wasrepresented mainly by Nikolai Morozov (1854 -1946), delivered in his multi-volume in 1900 - unfortunately only in Russian - a Christian book publishedin an abundance of suggestions for criticism of the traditional view of history.After 1990, the Russian research in the West was once known. It turned out that Russia had arrived at the present historical issues much further.Particularly through the application of mathematical and statistical methods was achieved by the Russian research achievements and breakthroughs,which were in the "free West" remains unknown.Here is necessarily mention Anatolj Fomenko, whose two-volume magnum opus on the statistical analysis of the stories of the earlier history of 1994is published in English (Fomenko, 1994). The author examines and compares the historical content of the Bible, the Trojan War, the ancient Greek,Roman and medieval history and wins with his amazing methods known isomorphisms when rulers and events. All historical periods are recognizedas duplicity, which can be placed on top. - The mathematical and statistical bases Fomenkos are not always easy to understand. Especially we musttake into account that historical astronomical observations were the trigger for the investigation.Although Fomenko spreads a wealth of material that are identified parallels far from perfect and deserve to be continued. His methods will beessential in the following.In addition to Russian, German research has created since the 80's bases and drivers. It would be called a number of names that have undertakenthe major task of the revision of the earlier history and chronology.and the media, yet little noticed. But that all innovators should take into account. There is no free entry into a new scientific territory.Parallels or multiplied HistoryThe aforementioned Fomenko has treated in his 1994 two-volume work published in English in a previously unsurpassed way the problem of olderfictional story. His approach is. As I said mathematically and statistically. He compares historical content and data, and notes that earlier periods ofhistory in their duration and their contents overlap. The whole story is older by Fomenko no more than six text books.Central are the notions of Fomenko shift of the time difference () and the content of history-related flow (jet) (By comparing the historical narrativematerial narrative material) we get for him a global chronological chart (global chronological diagram), depending on the circumstances, periodsbetween about 250, 300, 1000 and 1800 years length parallel sets. The mathematical models reveal statistical maxima and certain graphs whichprove the isomorphisms of historical data and facts.Genial is on Fomenko, the discovery of historical periods to be set in parallel, of duplicity of rulers and events in apparently completely different eras,such as the history of ancient Israel and the Eastern Roman Empire or the Holy Roman Empire of the Middle Ages and the Habsburg Empire sincethe Middle Ages ( Figure 1). The written history book (textbook) and the down biographies (written biography or enqu & te-code) of a historicpersonality show when you analyze the details, in myriad ways similarities with other rulers.Fomenko lists no fewer than 34 points, one at awatch groups, religious events, etc. are included. These things must not be listed here in detail because they are explained below with numerousexamples,

Especially important are the names, because they have a meaningful role. Whether a person or place makes no difference. Each name of the fictitiousstory has a symbolic meaning, which can break down the analysis. And epithets are just as important as the main name or first name.The textbook of ancient history can be found in the written tradition, so the biblical writings, the "ancient" and "medieval literature are''- this is nowhistory books or poems. Needless to say that the oldest tradition - but in my opinion recorded only from the 16th century - is consistently historicalfiction.Fomenko has given the impetus to seek even in the earlier history for parallels or duplicity to. This allowed me to expand both the theory and to modifyand discover a lot of new examples from ancient history book.Because Fomenkos approach is astronomical, he sees him-melskundlichen beginning of our era in the 11th Century or in the year 1000 AD.According to him, it must therefore be isolated from that date datable events - which I think is impossible.In my view, the matrix of the history of invention is crucial, not the design. So it is irrelevant, is set in the period a person or a fact. The old story isahistorical: Everything is on the same temporal level. A religious occasion, which is shifted into the history books of the Old Testament, will not be

judged in that context. It only tells something about the circumstances of the time in which this story was invented.Look through the beginnings of history, we must rely on appropriate source of edits, and secondary selections. - This is to say that editing is better themore faithfully follows the original sources. But just since 20 Century, many historians think that they need to gain new aspects from ancient history.This is the tradition, but filtered important is omitted under certain circumstances, for this exaggerated insignificant. Most of all, this history of poetry in


2/12

a historical dimension pumped, which does not have.The fictional ancient history is a neverending story, when we come farther and deeper, but never understood all the facets. Like in a kaleidoscope of achemical in a specific process is altered in each case if that is a seemingly different picture. The individual people and stories so get a proteancharacter, they are formed basically by the same template, but most of it with smaller or larger differences - obviously not to let the similarity tooprominent.Fomenko speaks of the "text book", Edwin Johnson of the "key book" of the old story - but it might also be the blueprint, called the blueprint. What ismeant in each case, the matrix, the joint submission, according to which historical and literary stories of the older, established the prehistoric era was.Another characteristic of the history of invention is that there is no clarity. A construction has finally forever internal weaknesses. The plausibility isoften very stressed. There is also visual evidence:Let us look at some of the "medieval" miniature, on which the enthroned Emperor Constantine the Great, the burning of the writings of the Arians

monitored (Figure 2). Now the great Roman Emperor himself, and Heath will only be converted to Christianity on his deathbed. But unfortunatelychose the wrong religion, the dying Constantine: He baptized himself Hess Arian! - How can a ruler is to destroy the writings of a faith-lasBut the Habsburg Emperor Friedrich III. (1437 - 1493) reigned for so long. - The latter is the way, 1452 was the last German king crowned in Rome bythe Pope to Emperor. - From geschichtsanaly-cratic perspective, we will see that it was not just the last one, but probably also the only German rulerwho traveled to Rome for coronation, because the Pope was residing there until about 1420. - But even that is not secure. For the European history ofthe 15th Century is implausible. So probably not a German king was crowned in Rome.Otto the Great meets the above-mentioned in Old Testament kingdom of Judah's king ASA, whose name sounds strikingly similar to OTTO. - Thebiblical king is dated around 900 AC, the German-Roman king in the 10th Century AD, yielding a time distance of 1800 years - Fomenko has stressedthe global chronological shifts. So that two identical historical figures, as here, Otto and Asa, were, at certain times the mass, just like here, at 1800years, moved and inserted into each in their own history books.Both the famed Julius Caesar and the late Roman emperor Julian the Apostate, have a sole of two years. - Not only the names and the rule lengthconnecting the two emperors. - And in the Old Testament, there is a ELAH as king of Israel, who also ruled two years: Elah = (J) elah has the sameroot as Julius or Julian.Depending on the 22/23 years ruled the second century AD Roman Emperor, Antoninus Pius, that the pious, and the High Middle Ages, EmperorHenry II of SACRED. -But the Habsburg Emperor Maximilian I was called the FROMME. Below him was the famous astronomy book, published theAlmagest written, allegedly under Antoninus Pius.The latter also had an analogue in late Roman period, namely, in the Regent Aetius, which is a contraction of Antoninus Pius. But Aetius is presenteven in the legendary Roman king of Livy's history as Ancus MARCIUS. - The vast time differences between theseAfter Augustus ruled Rome ruler to anarchy following the year 68/69 AD: Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius and Nero. -Tiberius was entitled TiberiusClaudius Nero, Tiberius Claudius Drusus Germanicus the title: Who should be understood here is the story, when adorned with the name Tiberius,who reigned until later, Claudius, but with those who have died (Tiberius) or killed (Germanicus) were?

And we know the ruler between Tiberius and Claudius, with his nickname CALICULA what is supposed to mean "soldier's boots." - But the ruler's realname was Gaius Caesar! Has been doubled here as a Julius Caesar?Every ten years ruled Vespasian, Otto II, Albert I of Habsburg and Rupert of the Palatinate. - The same rule duration will probably be a coincidence.In the Flavian emperors Vespasian, Titus and Domitian, the names are interchangeable. One reads Vespasian and Titus Titus Vespasian, Titus andDomitian. Were these Roman emperors cut around until later in three rulers and are originally for the same thing?The surname of the rulers are as significant as the name itself, the infamous Roman Emperor Nero reigned 14 years and died by suicide. He had acounterpart in the late Roman period in VALENS, who ruled the same length, will also be presented as a tyrant, and also in an unnatural way, waskilled. In the German High Middle Ages, the Roman ruler Nero meets Henry III. (1039 to 1056). The more recent history suppressed often that thiswas the nickname of Henry = BLACK NERO.In the High Middle Ages, there was a Jesus-variant in the monk Hildebrand, later Pope Gregory VII (see detail: Fomenko II, 182 et seq.) ThisHildebrand came to Rome in 1049 AD, in the tenth year of the reign of Henry III. the BLACK. -But even the Apostle Paul was 64 AD in Rome,executed in the tenth year of the reign of NERO.the Great to know. Whose government is somewhat longer duration: 490 - 526th But if we combine the Emperor Commodus, Septimius Severus andCaracalla (180 - 217) we come to the same period as Theodoric domination. -That certain potentates were divided into different eras into multiple splitto some extent, we are often found.Under Constantine the Great began a new era of Roman imperial history. Constantine reigned 31 years, the same length as his late medieval analogyof the family of Charles IV of Luxembourg.Constantine favored the Catholic Church, as Charles IV"Priest king" ridiculed.Constantine divided his kingdom into twelve dioceses. This division is found in the Old Testament once in the twelve tribes of Israel.

Constantine founded the tetrarchy, the four-rule of the Empire - Even Charles IV, his country divided into four parts.Constantine the Great had leaves but also a reign of 37 years, if they are running from 300 - 337 AD. - In order to match the legendary first Romanking QUIRINUS ROMULUS, the equally long prevailed, and end up in the sky had been removed. - Legends of the Christian Church says the samewriter Eusebius of Constantine the Great. And is the "Quirinus" certainly a deliberate concealment of DIVINUS = the divine. The name is proved bythe history.In the German High Middle Ages, there are four rulers named Konrad: Konrad I (911 - 918), Conrad II (1024 to 1039), Conrad III. (1138 - 1152) andConrad IV (1237 to 1254). - Is not it more than strange that follow these Konrad at a distance of about a hundred years? What were these kings in theruler list for a function?A Pope Urban II in 1095 should have prompted the French to the first crusade to the Holy Land. - Also called an URBAN IV after the fall of theHohenstaufen the French Duke

Charles of Anjou to conquer southern Italy. - Naples and Campania were also the Holy Land, as we shall see later.CHARLES of Anjou corresponds to the Greek-Persian history of Cyrus. Charles of Anjou defeated Manfred Caesar, a late Hohenstaufen king Cyrusdefeated the Lydian King Croesus. LYDIA entvokalisiert reads as LT, which means Lazio; Croesus as CR, which results Caesar.On behalf of Moses, the representative of God as the Pope, in the Old Testament JOSHUA conquered the Holy Land. Joshua is a duplicate ofCharles of ANJOU: AN / JOU> JOIN TO> JOSHUA.Also, the Eastern Roman history, Jesus has called a variant, but not as rulers but as a church father of the famous Dasilius of Caesarea, and Basil theGreat. - We know that Jesus was portrayed as god-king, especially in the east. Emperor Greek means "ruler", just like Caesar in Latin. The name alsomeans "great ruler", "great Caesar," a typical Greek-Orthodox representation.On the names must be paid first, as we have already experienced enough of that. Since the Emperor Nero had a co-regent, the famous philosopherSeneca, which drove the tyrant after his death. - Even if you do not know the latter fact, one could guess it, because Seneca comes from the Latin se

Necare, which means "to kill himself." Nomen et omen)Seneca even basic Christian attitude might otherwise be inferred from the name of his counterparts. In the Eastern Roman Empire existed in thesecond half of the 4 th century AD one co-regent named Gratian, or "mercy" in Latin. - But Gratian, still contributes to a strange nickname TheSEILER. The term does not seem to make sense.But we must be aware that the initial history book, was the first entvokalisierten probably consisted only of Latin words from which one could producea variety of forms."Seiler called RESTIO Latin (accusative: RESTIONEM). Entvokalisiert results RSTN. If we add to the beginning of a C, he adopt-CRSTN>CHRISTIANUS. Gratian of Seiler had the sameAt Seneca, there is yet another illustration. On the burgundy carpets - probably from the second half of the 16th Century the town was included inBern, is a (now-legendary Count Herkin shown cf. Rapp / Stucky, 2002). This old man kills an underling who failed or refused to execute an order tomurder. But at the same lies HERCIN kill the Latin Necare = as in Seneca. So here says it all: independent Alquen!Not only individual rulers, empires have often similar to the same lengths of time. The so-called Holy Roman Empire of the German High Middle Ageslasted from the beginning of the 10th Century to around 1250th - The Habsburg Empire officially began in 1273 and lasted until the beginning of theThirty Years' War, also about 350 years - depending on where one sets the beginning and the end. - A similar length has the classic Roman Empire,


3/12

which you can start with Sulla and can end up with a Diocletian or Constantine the Great. - But the Kingdom of Judah, whose capital AC 587 wasdestroyed by the Babylonians, like take long if you use the official biblical chronology.The Babylonian captivity of the Jews in Babylon, is well known, lasted for seventy years. Also, the alleged captive of the Roman church in Avignon inthe 14th Century took the same length and is called by the chroniclers also as the Babylonian captivity.Duplicity, and there are parallels in a variety of ostensibly historical events. It's amazing how much the same, certain facts, but without beingperceived by most as identical. From Roman history as it is known that the Romans had their conquests often make twice:Italy had been subjected to before the Punic wars all over the city of Rome. But at 90 AC, there was a large uprising of the Italian allies - just beforethe capital. The Romans had not been subjected to at the beginning of their domination of their homeland closer altogether?but occur in several text books and in several variations. The old story about a graph similar to that of MC Escher, with its illusionistic elements andtheir imperceptible transitions from one representation to another level.

Then the names of the earlier period of time are arbitrary and misleading. It is known that "the boundaries between ancient and medieval times aremore than vague" (Davidson / Luhmann, 128). And these are even later than the content was created.Not only this: The ancient world in the classical sense is an invention of modern times. Cemented the term in fact only by German professors of the 19Century: This invented a c lassic Greco-Roman antiquity, just like the historian Gustav Droysen the term "Hellenism" introduced.The term "Middle Ages" was first in 1688 by the German humanist Keller, Latinized Cellarius needed. Previously, the idea that between the Romanand the presence of a medium-Ae vum lie, unknown. And today we're dealing with a medievalist science, which says , it can carry thousands ofannual review and documented medieval sources.Here one must assume that the term represents the Middle Ages a stopgap. Initially, ie at the beginning of history, after 1500, they probably had theright idea: They saw the end of the. Antiquity "and felt in a new time-of today's" modern era ". It was the falsification of that "history", ie the extensionof the present backward, which eventually forced them to a "medieval say" too.As the era names incorrectly, so the time positions are to be regarded as absurd.But when the times are not accurate, the ages are wrong and overstretched, then is not the factual basis for the real story, which this time frame willbe filled with life, be true. It leads you right to question the authenticity of the sources of that earlier time. And both things are inter-imposed: theabsence of reliable data, no reliable time-GeTime divisions uueneniragen uno must be gesonaen Denanaeit - but always in terms of their interdependence.Because it takes more effort to review the historical sources for their reliability, should first be pointed out here a few concrete examples that thealleged chronology can not be true of the older times.Thousand years as one day or the overstretched construction historyThe finding that the times and lengths of age before the end of the so-called Middle Ages to tune came to me quite by chance, when I began to studythe Gallo-Roman traces in my landscape. I remember one evening, even at nightfall, on a wooded hill in the old days sampled an apparently hewnstone with his hands. Instinctively I had the realization that the Gallo-Roman times until well apparently projected into the late Middle Ages - or the late

Middle Ages, deep in the ancient world, when we looked at it from the other side. The times and periods, which previously seemed to firmlyestablished, were suddenly falling into place. The historical depth, a condition for the representation of a cultural history, no longer existed.This idea first before I dared not openly express myself. But the doubts persisted, and urged me to find concrete evidence for the conjecture. - I didnot have to look far.Immediately north of Bern is the system of the Aare river bends of the narrow (Pfister, the ancient Bernese bear, 2002, 59 et seq.) This was the site ofa Gallo-Roman Celtic settlement with an extensive system of fortifications. Even Roman remains have been found: one street village, a Vicus withBadgebude; a remarkable Korridorbau and particularly a curious, falsely as an amphitheater arena, a building whose purpose I still interpreted inmany years of employmentNorth of this arena, have been identified to date, three closely spaced so-called Gallo-Roman temple square. The buildings are in their floor plans andmasses as typical as the other such structures, were discovered in Gaul, Germany and Britain (Figure 3, below). The temples are considered theindigenous Celtic gods, religious buildings, which had resulted in the Roman pantheon an equal existence.Which of the three deities of the temple at the quadrangle Engehalbinsel were consecrated in Berne, one does not know. - But according to theconventional dating, you can put these buildings in the first century AD. - And the ending leaves archaeological traces of Roman settlements in Bern-corner to the third century. It would also be the date of the destruction of religious buildings above.My thinking was particularly interesting for the most easterly of the three square temple, known as the Temple of the research I (Figure 3, above): Onthe foundations of pagan construction that is built in the late Middle Ages, a chapel, whose history we know about. The small religious building to beerected in the early 1340s. 1532nd Soon after the introduction of the Reformation in Berne, the chapel has been canceled.From today's perspective seems to me the date of construction of the chapel to be premature. I would put it about a century later. - But even if oneleaves the conventional data, one comes to interesting considerations.It is not exceptional, but often the contrary, that churches, monasteries and chapels were built on pagan places of worship. But there are some

peculiarities that make suspicious.Taking the official positions of time between the destruction of the Temple Square (3.-century AD) and the construction of Christian Chapel (c. 1340),one finds a time gap of over a thousand years. How can we explain such a huge gap? Is the official history of events really solid and plausible, tobridge this enormous chronological hiatus? OrAnother consideration is added: the aforementioned chapel was built exactly on the foundations of the temple square. Who would after a thousandyears, without knowing, without a credible tradition, archives and paths, yet, find exactly where the soil is an ancient religious structure?More than that: Why have had the builders spatmittelalterlichen their chapel was built just above the Temple I, which is still far away temples offeredtwo other foundations? - One gets the impression that the people knew even then what god each of the three temples was sacred. But from such avast distance of time such knowledge is absolutely unimaginable.Here, as in other places as interesting as I had the unsettling suggestion that the Gallo-Roman period was to be found immediately behind the so-called late Middle Ages, and that therefore any alleged coincides kulturgeschichtlicher period of about a thousand years to a day. The suspicionseemed risky at first, so I replaced him. But if you want to scare the nature with a fork, until it comes right back. The doubts were ultimately subjectand starting point of this book.What I first at the temples on the square Engehalbinsel found near Bern, confirmed for me by other findings in architectural history in the near and far.As the archaeologists found that it is in the area between Bern and Solothurn were about thirty Roman villas, which were subsequently built into thelate medieval village churches. Rather quiet and embarrassed about this fact, the researchers say that this suggest a certain continuity betweenancient and medieval times. - According to these people should not preach, because such a claim would take at a time distance of about a thousandyears of daring.We can add that in ancient times were built new buildings on the old, because that way and saved work. - AndAll over Europe can find such examples of a time-coated architectural history. The official history of art knows this and says: "It is characteristic of thearchitecture of the Middle Ages that the structures formed in long construction times (Mrusek. 7). - But you should probably more accurate to say that

the history of architecture, therefore, fails as long as long periods are available, which we tried to fill barely right. Liesse is shrinking between antiquityand the Middle thousand years one days, we were much closer to historical truth.And enters basic evils of history at the building's history to light: It is not on the actual observation and subsequently tried to estimate times andevents, but presses the things in an arbitrary and unrealistic chronological and historical framework. Being confronted with an absurd story, whichappears to tacitly accepted.The cross of the Christian eraFrom the aforesaid, it is clear that not only the content but also the time positions of the earlier history does not agree, but where exactly is the point?Time positions are too long, the astronomical calculations were wrong or miscalculated different eras?Only the presentation of the various chronologies would need a separate book. And also to identify current trends in the chronology of discussion, onemight get lost (see the general theme: Garland, 2000).But without at least a rudimentary clarity on historical time positions and time calculations will not do. I have rolled these problems in recent yearsconsistently and I formed an opinion on various topics. - Mainly you want to play them in the following. The shortened theses reasoning mustinevitably omit some shades and can indicate the derivations most. But that's the only way into the thicket of historical chrono -First noted is that all dates and age requirements must start today, because only the present time is absolutely secure. That may sound trivial, but is


4/12

often forgotten is the fundamental evil of historical chronology, that it considers temporal anchor points in distant times for sure. So that is believed tobe in a years 1 in fact born a Savior. But before today, when was that date?You hold the dating problems are often a mere question of conversions. Typical of this is the Grotefend, that all historians of the era knownPaperback, first published in 1880 (1). This tool can be all different chronologies, annual origins and eras convert to today's data. Chronology istherefore a beautiful area and so simple, requiring only a little computational ability.Sure datable are basically just the last few centuries before today, because it is only for this period with a verifiable written tradition, a reliable calendarand a single annual census.Today's calendar is well known, based on the calendar reform of Pope Gregory XI. by the year 1582. The aim was to improve a calendar, put theimperfect switching rule, the date of Easter finally in the early summer. Decree on the calendar was expressly stated as the purpose of restoring theskies of Nicaea. The first general council of Nicaea "325 AD" had secured an Easter date, which had proved to be incorrect. If that is the end of the

16th century, 1600 years will have elapsed since the birth of Christ, the faulty circuit of the old calendar was found over this period a backlog of about300 years.From geschichtsanalytischer view here is the following to say:The council alleged in such a distant time is fiction. And even the alleged sources about this event never speak of them that we wanted to reprice theEaster date.The fact is simply that before 1582 AD, Christian Europe, a Ka-lender that was in the natural day length rather exceeded. Mannotionally .- And the name should not go back to the famous Roman, but to Joseph Justus Sealiger (1540 to 1609). the "father of modern chronology,"whom we shall meet more often (Figure 4). This seems to have coined the term in memory of his father, Julius Sealiger, a famous philologist.Since 1582, therefore the sky coincides approximately with the calendar. - As it should be added, however, that for example, the Protestant areas ofEurope have adopted the Gregorian calendar reform until about 1700 - and Russia is known only after the October Revolution of 1917.Before 1582, all calendar dates are uncertain and will take decades to completely hypothetical. 1582 is probably the first safe year of world history.Determine Equally important is that we use today, the Christian year census. This chronology is the incarnation of Jesus Christ in a hypothetical year1, after which counting so to this day two thousand years elapsed Christian should be. This so-called Inkamationsstil has generally prevailed.The Christian year census is now the first and only reliable method of numbering years, we know. As close to equal in two more questions: Were thereother chronologies? - And when the Christian era was introduced at all?There are actually a lot of other calendars, eras, year censuses. F.K. Ginzel counts them in his standard work on (Ginzel, 1906 to 1914): Babylonian,Egyptian, Alexandrian, Roman, Jewish, Arab chronologies, calendars, and Velta, besides also special systems such as the Greek or RomanOlympians Konsularjahre, the Diocletian Indikti-onszyklus and the Spanish ERA.Without getting lost here in this broad field of historical chronology, must be stated clearly that all these other systems are not older than the Christian-JahrzhThe Christian Anno Domini style is the first and only reliable Datierungsart. But it is not equal to the hypothetical year 1 was introduced, and there are

logical reasons only from the time usable, from which reliable written records.Dating method has been postulated that after the birth of Christ by a Scythian (!) Monk named Dionysius Exiguus in Rome around 525 AD - exiguuslatin means "small aims, slim." This is a new cleric 532jhrigen Easter cycle has developed, not by the Roman ab urbe condita-date, or ran out ofDiocletian Mrtyrerra, but from the birth of Christ. "The Incarnation of Christ, moved to the center and repressed the memory of the Roman Emperor(Maier, 1991.33).The new counting method, the incarnation of style, seems to have been a plausible census years, so you must be wondering why this was taken overin Christian Europe has been slow. Although the famous Bede in his Ecclesiastical History of the English people at the beginning of the 8th to CenturyAD have used this inventory (see, Topper, 1998, 123 et seq.) But this is suspected early Bede: For he knows not only the incarnation of style, buteven after the census years before Christ - an idea that has only emerged after 1500. Moreover, this Beda is also applying the Arab-Indian zeros, andputs them ahead in his readers even. The number zero can be reached only in the late Middle Ages in Europe. - Here and still with many other things,proves to Bede as 800 years anticipation of the Renaissance.According to Bede had to count that year after Dionysius Exiguus again to wait for several centuries. Supposedly the incarnation was the style in the11th Century, widely introduced in Europe. -But an assertion is without good evidence.And precisely the papal Rome, where this so early, Dionysius is said to have acted from the far Scythia, hesitated for the longest time. It was not until1431 that is the Pope's office took over the Anno Domini-counting for their deeds.that we talk about would have been impossible without the Christian year census. Only thus could reflect not only myths, legends and myths - like theancient world did - but put them in a seemingly indisputable time frame. More than that: The history, the pagan period, could be recorded with theChristian calculated backward chronology and collected for the purposes of the new religion.This recalculation created the first thousand years, "Middle Ages", which are not shown to have their building.One thing is certain in any case, that the Christian year census originally started with a year 1 or 1000th The four-digit years appear to have happened

to arise. And the current year 1 as the birth of Christ, even seems to have been subsequently incorporated into the system. The invention of thelegend of Dionysius Exiguus and legitimacy of the Gregorian calendar reform, with the alleged decisions of a council of Nicaea, are clear evidence.The divine timetable of Christian theology is a chance result, and appears on closer analysis of various elements more rough than cobbled together.Although the Christian era, period, generously created for the rear extension, ie the invention of salvation history, it was soon pushed to new timebarriers that had to be overcome in theory and in practice. What was, for example, with the time before Christ's birth?The idea that there is also a time ante Christum natum, given before the birth of Christ, must have seem to come up a little later. Bede speaks ofEnglish church history prior to Christ during the landing of Caesar in Britain. - But Edwin Johnson dated the earliest plausible historical informationabout England in the Tudor period and identifies one years 1533 (Johnson, 1894, ch 1).The final connection between the Anno Domini (AD) - and Ante Christum (AC)-completed data until Sealiger and Petavius. TheseBooks have their fates indeed. When I was in my student days Walther Rehms The fall of Rome in Western thought reading. I meant to know whatfamous thinkers of the modern era told in the West about the reasons for the decline of this empire. Today I believe that the alleged ancient Rome andits downfall as Sparre of the Western mind is to be considered. The Roman Empire is a historical problem, the first order, is not because of his fictionalexistence, but because for centuries it looped into the minds of education that produces any doubt incredulous astonishment.It is not easy. To find objections to the ancient Rome. Too well the picture of the Romans and their empire seems to be prepared to handle that wouldoffer itself anywhere a working surface.A historical analysis provides the first objection.Rome on the Tiber to have been founded in 753 AC. - The date is obviously regarded by the research as a hypothetical. - And within seven hundredyears, this initially poor settlements all over Italy and finally to have conquered all the countries around the Mediterranean Sea. After the RomanEmpire was built, it should have existed, with few losses and limits full five hundred years in the West and the East Roman empire, however is said tohave continued to live after the separation from Westrom even full thousand years, until the fall of Constantinople in 1453 AD that the last spurs put anend to.

Because conventional historians are accustomed to dealing with large periods in prehistory, they have never taken offense at the allegation that therehad been a kingdom that had existed from its earliest beginnings to its last foothills of two thousand years.Roman Empire rise. A power state, which had existed two thousand or even centuries, but even contrary to the laws of nature. Violence needs to themaintenance of huge amounts of energy. And according to the second law of thermodynamics, any conversion of energy associated with losses thatcan not be recovered. The entropy is always great and brings any energy-consuming system in the long term will inevitably collapse.Now the energy base in ancient times was based almost exclusively on wood. And the countries around the Mediterranean are now all under threat oferosion and sparsely wooded, as a result of centuries old exploitation. Thus, the very idea absurd, a great empire could have received two thousandyears their power baseThe history of the Roman Empire was invented by people who had no knowledge of economic realities. For example, the Romans in the First PunicWar a few years had fleet is fashioned of 120 warships and thus gained around Sicily splendid victories against the Carthaginians. - Wood waspresent at that time apparently both in Sicily and in Calabria in abundance.A new direction of the Earth, which is represented in Germany by names such as Hans-Ulrich Niemitz, Christian detachment and Gnter Menting,estimates the end of the last Ice Age, so-called three or four thousand years before present (nakedness, 2000). Under the assumption of two millenniaof Roman Empire but this could also fill half the postglacial. For a Stone Age and the beginnings of metal processing time would be little space left


5/12

over.Any history requires written sources. In ancient Rome are the inscriptions, coins and historian. But what should we make of such a history, are in fullfifteen hundred years by a mere eight major historiographical phen covered: Polybius, Livy, Sallust, Caesar, Tacitus, Suetonius, Dio Cassius,Ammianus Marcellinus! - And from what time the alleged writers have come down!nem casting, but zusammengekleistert from different eras, which do not give a coherent picture and development in their content and time periodsoverlap. Fomenko has these connections in his great work also demonstrated statistically and mathematically. We will therefore only sketch here themain points again, so far as they are important for the following discussion.Rome's history has begun with a period of the monarchy, which lasted exactly 244 years and was covered by seven kings. - Also know Troy hadseven kings until his demise. For a Roman king resulted in an average reign of almost 35 years - a biological impossibility. The Roman period of themonarchy is regarded as legendary, but it still stands in the history books.

After the expulsion of the kings of Rome had known at the republican form of government - a claimed for before two thousand five hundred years, anincredibly modern and revolutionary innovation. Here Are the northern Italian republics of the Renaissance made the model?The more powerful and imperial Rome, the more the republican institutions had to be hollowed out and make autocratic and dictatorial forms of rulespace. Officially, the Roman Empire had begun shortly before the Christian era with Augustus. But this silence is that described Roman historianPlutarch even the rulers of the late Republic, so Sulla, Pompey and Caesar, without restriction as kings.Similarly, the modern historian of Rome disregard that the prefer Caesarism is not straight up to the alleged demise of the Western Roman Empire476 AD. Fomenko provides a second by Sulla Roman Empire until the end of the Severan dynasty, with about three hundred years duration.Most of the historical sections of the fictional history are divided by interpolated shorter or longer periods of anarchy. The second Roman Empire sankunder Septimi-us Severus and Caracalla in the chaos of the military emperors. All of theseusually senr Kurzzemg nerrscner regierenaen siaroen an unnatural death, as in troubled times is just as true.Only with Diocletian and Constantine the Great began a new, third Roman Empire, which allegedly even a new, a third Rome was his capital on theBosporus and after 250 years of powerful sank into chaos and anarchy. But even before 476 AD the western empire was liquidated by the Germans.After the Byzantines conquered ancient Rome on the Tiber back to Ostrom.The Byzantine Empire came to an end and it was followed by two further periods of the Eastern Empire, Byzantium and led to the conquest ofConstantinople by the Latins of the West 1204 AD a break. But despite the Franks seemed to recover the Greek East to AD 1453 only to perishheroically storm the Turkish attack on the capital.But even in the West, the Roman Empire never really seemed to be ending. The German Empire of the West cultivated a symbiotic relationship withthe ancient Romans. And at first seemed the Carolingian and later the Holy Roman Emperors, the old Roman glory in the West continue, at least inname.And because empires pass away, but remain religions, there is the Roman Empire is still in the form of the Roman Catholic Church Universal, with thesame capital city of Rome at that time.

This is not even an outline of Roman imperial history, but it already shows a sketch of what is a historiographical monster set before us for centuries. -And already the outlines show how little evolutionary. how artificial the eras are juxtaposed in this overly long periods of time. - The detailedinvestigations are cracks in this seemingly compact mass of narrative clearly show.But there are also substantive objections to the historical bogeyman, who calls himself the Roman Empire.With few exceptions, the time of the Roman Republic was not substantiated by artifacts. Inscriptions from this period,ner had an internal ordering power for conquering army. For this reason, some have claimed big fights between Germans and Romans or the Romansand the Persians did not take place, for all these nations have been represented on the army.We know that were attached to external ones that "Roman Empire", both in England and in Africa and the East. Famous and well-researched is thelimit in Germany, the former by walls and ramparts and fortified by watchtowers and forts secure rear boundary. This line seems to show clearly that itcame to the defense against external enemies of the Empire. - Now, however, have refuted the earlier limit of research that common view. Thefortress historian writes in his August from Cohausen Befestigungsweisen of antiquity and the Middle Ages (1898), that the Roman frontier wall insouthwestern Germany after analysis of its characteristics can not possibly have had a primarily military significance. "The Roman frontier wall wasnot to defend itself, but it represented a visible laws and customs border between the free and the Germans Romans ... " (Cohausen, 101). "Wethink ... Neither the wall nor the devil Pfahlgraben for facilities on military Zwek ken, but for border stamps for tariff protection "(Cohausen, 103).The analysis of the limit, but can also draw conclusions about the nature of the "Roman Empire". You can open up that this state structure is probablydue Anklumpung of countries around the Mediterranean and not primarily caused by conquest.Just the sight of the "Roman" building culture allows us to conclude that this is basically described as a Greek or Greek, Etruscan, especially withregard to the origin (Pfister, Avenches, 2000, 44). Certainly, this culture is in fact came from Syria and Egypt to southern Italy to Western Europe. Sunis not surprising that the "Roman" Westreich was first coined purely Greek. The Latin was probably artificially created to replace the Greek languageas a command and liaison. A Latin Roman Empire is a tremendous distortion of the original findings as

turned towards, that is precisely whose subtitle is undeniable: A Beilrag the history of historiography and decadence. For since the history of theRoman empire is lost, there can be no evaluative assessment of this culture. One can only conclude that this empire or that civilization has everstopped. It is needless to speak of decadence or decay. - This is the philosophy of history of modern times and betrays its origins in the history ofsalvation.Puzzles Rome in the Middle AgesRome was not originally a place name then, but a name. Only in the period, has emerged in which the historical matrix, this concept of salvation was acipher. And this could also have different names: Rome, New Rome, Jerusalem, Babylon, and even Troy: All these places primarily involved not somuch a particular city, but a religious symbol. That last city on the Tiber in Italy alone, retained the title, is regarded as the result of a subsequentaccidental and development, just like the city in Palestine alone was awarded the name of Jerusalem.The example of the city of Rome can also show how the history of poetry led to the fact that a particular place, the structure took shape, which calledfor the invention. The creation or recreation of the history of the Middle Ages was not only an intellectual and literary activity, but was in contact withbuildings and artifacts, which produced this era. We like to think we would know from original certificates of the said "Roman", without realizing thatthese things were possible only at the time when the concept originated. Coins with the portrait of Emperor Vespasian, for example, can not comebefore a certain time because the cipher plausible Vespasian was a minimum threshold. post-Roman, "date (Figure 5, below).Since that Rome was undoubtedly as ancient city had its importance, but not until the 15th Century glory and once againhave led ne shadowy existence among the ruins, but still the seat of the popes, but ultimately only the object of history and sacrifice of innumerabledepredations and humiliations.Ever since the 4th Century AD Rome is to be become increasingly insignificant and miserable. And the absence of the popes during the Avignon exile,would have meant an absolute nadir for the c ity, from which it is only through the permanent establishment of the popes in the 15th Centuryrecovered.We already looked at this rough sketch, that with the image of the city of Rome in the Middle Ages, not much can be true. But the problem is first

epistemological: What resources are available to us at all? - We guessed it already: They are the same sources from which we distill the underlyinghistorical matrix.Presumably, many historians, the notion of a millennial period of decadence of Rome does not appeal, but if one of the sources is supported, which allcome from a time and follow a specific purpose, nothing can come out different.The problem is ludicrous: As for the history of ancient Rome and a lot of ready sources and literature, we must gather together the history of Romewith difficulty in the Middle Ages, because - as mere expiration time is treated - very scant. There is the monumental history of Rome in the MiddleAges in eight volumes of Ferdinand Gregorovius (Gregorovius, 1903 -1908) - still a standard work. But the researchers of the 20th Century Rome, istoo little in that time. Richard Krautheimers representation brings it to about 400 pages yet, but Paul Hetherington monograph on the medieval Rometo brief comprises hundreds of pages.It is clear that one looks at the question of why Rome around 1420 - when the early AD-date is correct - the seat of the newly elected Roman CatholicChurch Universal --Kammeier deserves the credit for the invented story about the pope and Rome in the Late Middle Ages and analyze probable Strange events havefiltered out. According to him primitive Christianity in the 14th was Century popular, regionally and nationally have been. First in France but had adogmatic and organized papal church formed. At the University of Paris, a Catholic dogma had been created. And since that time there had been a


6/12

Gallic Pope. "The French were the first people to put the plan for a unified national dogma for discussion and ... this plan is implemented as a firstnation "(Kammeier. dogmas of Christianity, 53; in: Kammeier, 1979). The alleged Avignonesi-cal exile of the popes was therefore an enormoushistorical lie, because the original popes were all French and resided in France. Rome had never previously been the seat of Popes.Against the French claims to be excited - always according Kammeier - Italian and German resistance, and have led to the schism from 1378th At theCouncil of Pisa in 1409 had finally, the Italian-German group prevailed against the French. . Pisa is also is the beginning date of the now tightlyorganized, and from now on systematically pursued large counterfeiting operation history "(Kammeier, universal Church. 78; in: Kammeier, 1979).The history of invention now had to prove that Rome had since time immemorial been the capital of Christendom. But "the city of Rome, the city ofPopes and Christian places of worship, Rome is only in the course of the 15th Become the century "(Kammeier, puzzles Rome, 52; in: Kammeier,1979). The first Roman Catholic pope, moved to Rome in 1420, was elected to the Council of Constance Martin V.The arrival of the Pope in Rome was truly necessary. The condition of the city had become a terrible fact: The church wa

Without exaggeration, one may say that the greater part of the "antique" reliefs, sculptures and portrait heads, that in the museums of Rome, but alsoin other Italian museums and antiquity are presented to the Western world, its creation of the post-Roman period, so the Renaissance owes.'s Moststatues should be noted that one can not determine her age, and that therefore represent the periods referred to the lower time limit. This is becausethe antiquities forgery has never stopped and is still flourishing.Demonstrate a forgery, is possible only in a few cases, because the artist, his environment and the locality are mostly unknown. After all, one mustkeep, for example, the famous Laocoon in the Vatican Museums mandatory for a work by Michelangelo. - The plant was discovered incidentally in1506 in the Domus Aurea of Nero, in the presence of Michelangelo. - Russian investigators have opened up in this monumental sculpture that thiscould only be created with stucco and equipment, so they poured, not carved from a block was (Livre de civilization, 254). And this method has beendeveloped late.Most of the inscriptions of Rome you have to watch as forgeries. If, for example, of the triumphal arch of Septimius Severus in the Roman Forum, onthe magnificent inscription is clearly visible that a passage of the inscription is lower because, allegedly Ca racalla have here the names of themurdered co-regent of his brother Geta, and can repay, then proves that only you worked scrupulously as the counterfeiters.

Also on the Forum Romanum was inscribed in 1561, a Duilius Gaius, the victor of the Battle of Mylae, 261 AC found. "The dedication of themonument, however, is written in Carrara marble, a marble places that has appeared here much later. But The researchers nonetheless believe in thegenuineness of this inscription, because it is written in old-fashioned Latin. And the later marble you explain himself by saying that the inscription wascopied in the Augustan AgeTo be based in Rome. Here, a seal was singled out in the bull of Ludwig of Bavaria, "from the first half of the 14th Century ", is attached (Figure 5,above). This is of the form and style of art earlier than the late 16th century, associated seal shows in concise form, almost all the major ancient and

medieval monuments of Rome including the Pantheon, the Colosseum, the column of Marcus Aurelius, the Augustus Mausoleum, the Senator'sPalace, the Pyramid of Pyramid, the Lateran, St. Peter and Santa Maria in Trastevere. - The forgery is so contradictory that even the mere fact theexistence of a plausible historical 14th century can be denied.In the case of counterfeit coins (see, for example: Figure 5, below), statues and inscriptions, one recalls the statement of the Jesuit Jean Hardouin in1700 that not all of these artifacts are ancient and only from the late Middle Ages, created by greedy monks had been.In Rome are still a large number of significant ancient buildings preserved in towering ruins, so it really should be no doubt of the ancient eras. - But

just because one has to wonder whether there might be some famous "ancient" buildings not classically-Roman antiquity, but set in the 15th or 16thcentury. For the latter hypothesis speaking structural criteria, some of the details and The Baulegenden.Have been the Titus arch, which presents itself today in a classic restaurant in 1820, could perhaps originally an ancient passageway. But theinscription above the gate corresponds to the Renaissance. And affixed to the side walls of the passageway with the triumphal procession of Titusrelief after the conquest of Jerusalem "70 AD" may be only a late creation. The seven-branched candelabra pictured there can not have previouslygiven as a symbol of Judaism. - The religious tendency which the Arch of Titus with its bas-reliefs expresses clearly corresponds to the papacy at thebeginning of the Counter Reformation: "God is now available in Italy!" cries the pro-Roman Jewish writer Flavius Josephus his fellow countrymen(Metzler, 365).The Rome of the Popes, so that the late medieval town was built on the Champ de Mars. It is here that there are some beautifully preserved "Roman"antiquities.The two statues of the Emperor Trajan and of Marcus Aurelius, are cooked wonderfully preserved, although it should be passed over eighteenhundred years after its construction. But is the legend, at least for the Column of Trajan, a legend ready: The work is therefore preserved because itbelonged to a medieval church and a monastery. And 1162, the Column of Trajan, the Roman Senate had placed under protection - truly a very earlymeasure of public listed!Hess Emperor Trajan's statue - along with other major works of his splendid forum reflect on coins. And here one finds some surprising things: the

alleged contemporary of the emperor, who drew those designs from nature, obviously did not know which is the direction in which the relief bandwound around the pillar. Indeed, there are coins that show a rechtswindiges and such an linkswindiges relief tape (the tape is properly rechtswindig)! -For me, this fact is again an illustration of Kammeier assertion of the deliberate opposition to incorporating the church counterfeiters in their creations.Russian researchers have shown that the relief bands could be poured onto the Hohlsule Trajan's only in the stucco technique and the materialculture of late medieval reflect (Livre de civilization, 429 ff.)Incidentally, the Column of Trajan decorates only one since 1588 Petrus figure.Also in the middle of the historic center of Rome is the aforementioned well-preserved Pantheon. Here is yet to be received at the famous dome. Thisis cast in Roman concrete, and has a wingspan of 43.2 meters, a diameter that only have the Renaissance and the dome of the cathedral of Florenceand the dome of St. Peter's in Rome again reached and exceeded.Now the art has never been able to justify why the vault Roman art in the West and forgotten untileighteen hundred years, against all odds, such as fire, water, earthquakes, wars have defied?The diameter of the Pantheon is a way identical to that of the so-called foot Teatro Marittimo in the Hadri-ansvilla in Tivoli (see Figure 11, below) - amysterious circular structure, like the whole huge villa complex, it seems the ancient and yet so suspicious the late Middle Ages or even neo-Latin. -Therefore, one must ask, who had built the Pantheon and the Villa at Tivoli, Hadrian, or a ruler at the beginning of historical time.The Colosseum is truly colossal dimensions of his suspicions, and seems to have postantique emergence of themselves. But here, too crowded toquestions.As a model for the Flavian Amphitheater certainly that of Santa Maria Capua Vetere served: The construction plans are almost identical, only theColiseum is great to tenth. But that the model was taken out of Campania, is interesting and perhaps gives you an indication.With the construction of the amphitheater of the tradition is said to have begun by Vespasian. This was the vast building, but also on coins alreadycompleted course.

Among the popes of the 15th Century, especially under Nicholas V., is said to have served as the Colosseum because of its travertine quarry. But atthe same time it has broken the same stone also near Tivoli. This rock was used for the building?In all cities there were only a Roman amphitheater. Rome is an exception. In addition to the Coliseum that is, there is a second such structure, calledAmphitheatrum Castrense, east of the first and later incorporated into the Aurelian walls. - If you would now choose to search for one of the twotheaters, one would have to think very clearly the smaller original. For whatever reason, this building is dated by art historians rather late, "underElegabal", but that's not hot. For not only had too largeat the periphery. Therefore, in the late Roman era were often built into these structures elliptical walls.The Colosseum in Rome is pretty well known as the mathematical center of the Aurelian wall defined by the perimeter. Such a position would havebeen impossible in the classical period. - It is impossible not to put the gigantic in Late Roman and Romanesque time to see him as a neo-Latinbuilding. - Maybe the Pope has the 15th Century under the direction of the architect Leon Battista Alberti, the amphitheater was built.Fine view of the buildings around the Flavian Amphitheater shows that the older structures in the west belonging to the Temple of Venus and Roma,runs over. With good reason, the construction of this theater can be so into the 15th Century are set.Even the huge baths of Rome to ask questions. - Surely the 'Romans' bathing appreciated, but an accumulation of such huge bath complex but looksstrange. From designing her see the Baths of Caracalla, Diocletian and the Late Roman and from Roman Trajan more. They are built of brick, haveround and semi-circular arches and other parts of the Pantheon and Hadrian's Villa at Tivoli: also the same coffered vault, the same relationship to the


7/12

interior, the same use of opus caementicium, so Roman concrete.Russian technology researchers hold the Caracalla Baths and other similar buildings in Rome for a wide Baptisteries masses for ritual ceremonies(Livre de civilization, 179).Skeptical objections to a fundamental objection is to be done. Before the construction of the new St. Peter's Church in the 16th Century, the pope andthe papal pomp need building mania have also created great works. These are given in whole or in ruins, only need to see them, and assign thecorrect authors.For one thing, the first book in the early history of the Roman Titus Livius contains certain elements that are found in most other eras also invented.But then the religious references in it are so significant that Livy represents for the origin of both Judaism and Christianity alongside the biblicalwritings is a key work.Rome is to be first was a monarchy, and have had seven kings. - But Troy also said to have been covered by a total of seven kings. Already here is

quite clear that Rome is the legitimate successor of Troy: Rome's New Troy. - This claim had to the development time of Livius be particularlystressed. Because there was still a New Rome, Constantinople, also New Troy be wollto.Right in the preface to his History Livy explains why he has woven into the origins of Rome as much myth and legend: the ancient look up it was that"the beginnings of cities by mixing human and the divine sublime does." That is true in the sense that this chronicle is a religiously colored source - butthe religious spirit of its date, is recognize that between the late Middle Ages and Renaissance.Is well known, Rome was founded by refugees from Troy disappeared - but with about five hundred years of delay. For while Troy 1255 AC has beendestroyed, the establishment of ROMA QUADRATA PALLANTEUM or - as the city had been called on the Palatine first - set at 753 AC. And, ofcourse, as Livy tells of a temporal distance of about seven hundred years.The humble beginnings of the subsequent empire laid the brothers Romulus and Remus. This overwhelm and kill the k ing Numitor and justify theirrule in one place, inhabited by Latins, Albanians and Sabines.Soon it comes to fraternal strife, in which Romulus kills Remus. Romulus founded the Roman institutions, and his autocratic rule. The state, however,was due to unconsolidated women still lack. So they rob by a trick of the virginsSabinerknig Titus Tatius win of course, Rome and Romulus.Anyone who flies these stories tell straight away that this reflected two major legends of the Old Testament in the Roman will cover: the story of Cainand Abel in Genesis (1, Moses, 4) and the rape of the daughters of Shiloh (Judges, 21 ). Gather - it would be a nice study, all the texts of the Biblecommentators to these obvious parallels. They would probably do without this connection, either, not further problematize or talk to some stories that

just wander through all the ages and nations. - But this must be clearly stated that these legends have been created in the same era and were used intwo different but contemporaneous written sourcesFomenko has emphasized in several places, that has the mention of women in certain contexts a different meaning. At times, the church modes, andreligion have often been equated with a woman. If so rob the women of the Sabines, the Romans, so that means that they took their religion. - TheSabines are a people in the vicinity of Rome. But I do not sit in the Sabine mountains east of Rome. Sabi-nus (SPNS) reads like a corruption of

Neapolis - Naples. There is obviously no historian has yet noticed that although a number are referred to as minor cities and nations around Rome,but nowhere is the old establishment but Greek Neapolis. after all, the most important city in the vicinity of Rome. - But we will gather enoughevidence for the identification Sabines - people of Naples. It should be mentioned only for the time being, that the Emperor Vespasian and TitusSabinus led a middle name.Romulus reigned 37 years and was caught after his death in the sky. Something similar also told the church historian Eusebius of Eu-Constantine. Bythis time it is clear that Romulus is with his 37 year rule analogous to Constantine the Great, the Emperor, who created New Rome and the thirdRoman Empire.the foreland of New Rome or Constantinople. His name has nothing to do with Sparta, but is derived from Greek sta-vros, which means torturewooden cross. Spartacus is, therefore, the crucified, although it is dialectically treated in this legend of the Cross: The leader falls in battle, hisfollowers be crucified. - Probably they wanted to make the allusion to Christ is not so obvious, and therefore spared the leader of the martyrdom.Spartacus is the crucified Christ, therefore, called one of his lieutenants Crixus. His second assistant is CEnomaus. In the first part of the name liesentirely sure oinos Greek, so wine. - The second part of the word (MS) is difficult to break down. After long consideration, I now come to theconclusion that is complementary to a missing consonant: MS = PMS = PNS. Here, clearly alluding to the Eucharist, because at one bread, wine,Latin panis, panem. The slaves to the pagan Romans, therefore, with the Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation known.The slave revolt breaks out in Campania, which is of Canaan, the Holy land. And the supporters of the new religion gather on the sacred mountain,which is nameless in Livy, but here is the first time called Vesuvius.At Capua, the slaves to learn in the gladiator school of Batiatus. That is very clear Sebastian, the saint, who was killed by pointed arrows. Evidence isthat the gladiators when they steal from the collection of kitchen knives, then stabbing weapons. Spartacus and his followers will become familiar withthe deontology in the Campania region of martyrdom. Them is determined to suffer the ultimate martyrdom.Spartacus succeeded in some mysterious way, never to leave Italy, neither the North nor the South: the new religion at first confined to the peninsula.

Neither the Gauls or the Germans want to proselytize other countries.Spartacus would also translate to Sicily, Trinacria - again an allusion to the Christian cross - but he does not succeed, the Cilician pirates deny himpassage she read -

Anatolian Frontier Province is considered to Syria, but does Sicily (CLC> SCL = SICILIA). - Only the thing is understandable: The pirates in the Straitsof Messina are in fact part of the island and not from the east.On the Via Appia, the famous road that connects Rome and Campania, suffering the slaves of the cross - 6000 in number, except for their leader. -Why was there the famous legend Quo vadis settled Paul wants to flee from Rome before his martyrdom. On the Appian Way he met Christ. Paulasks him where he was going. The Savior replied that he had come to let himself be crucified once again. Then Paul returns to the city to suffer andsacrificed.This legend has a clear reference to Spartacus, and wants to remember this event.The slaves are basically always victorious, proving that Christianity will win. Only the time is not ripe for religious change. Pompey, of Caesar'sopponents, the later figure of Christ, takes the glory of victory over Spartacus claims for itself. But he did not even get your hands dirty with thesuppression of the uprising. Even Pompey have a link with the Christian story of salvation.The historical legend of Spartacus finds himself right in the Roman civil war. It had a little time pass before with Caesar, can then begin with Augustus,the imperial salvation.Marius, Sulla, Diocletian, Saul, Solon, Sertorius, PompeyAccording to the official view of history begins only with the Roman Empire, Augustus, "30 AC" or "23 AC". This overlooks that describe the ancientsources, especially Plutarch, the great Roman leader of the first century BC, Sulla and Pompey, as fully as kings. At the latest with Sulla, 82 AC, butperhaps with Marius, 107 AC, again catching ahas probably received the view count for this time of the Republic.

Rome is a military power and has to keep constantly struggles with foreign invaders: particularly again in the last decade before the war, 100 AC witha Jughurta, which is located in the African Numidia, and with the Cimbri and the Teutons, are invading from the north. It proved itself as one generalGaius Marius, who now determines the Roman politics, until he is succeeded by Lucius Cornelius Sulla.Marius said to have been irascible and intemperate, but that is a characteristic of many Roman rulers. His inner main enemy is Sulla. Against Rome,he moved with an army that he has recruited from the Samnites, and slaves. After twenty-one effectiveness Marius dies shortly before a campaign inthe east with a hemorrhage.Puzzling, is first the name Marius. But it is certain that here is an allusion to the Catholic Church's history. One need not look far: MARIUS ARIUS isthat important ruling, which emphasized the supremacy of God the Father. Marius is also considered the "third founder of Rome" by Aeneas andRomulus. And how many god-ruler of Rome, he died shortly before a campaign against the Parthians - Persian. - Also indicative of his basicallyChristian-Roman attitude is that Marius slaves, so Christians can serve in his army.As an opponent of Marius excels Lucius Cornelius Sulla. This is also a brilliant military commander and defeated as such Jughurta of Numidia andMithridates of Pontus. The long war Sulla's absence allows the Marians in Rome and in Spain to gain the supremacy. But when Sulla returned fromthe east via Brindisi and appoint himself dictator can, learn the capital of his violent temper. Proscriptions called the lists of proscribed Marians. Theseinternal enemies are now being killed by the thousands. Even cities that oppose him, to feel Sulla's vengeance. In the mountain town of Palestrina, a


8/12

large cult east of Rome, he can kill thousands. The Plebejerherrschaft of Marius is liquidated, the rule of Se -This Sulla is a capable organizer. And above all, he sees its limits: After twenty-one, he puts his effectiveness resign voluntarily and goes intoretirement.That a ruler voluntarily resigns, is found in ancient history, very rarely. Where this occurs, we shall carefully to see if there are parallels here. They areavailable in the late Roman history: After 21 years of rule comes back in 305 AD Diocletian, the god-ruler, and draws in its retirement home forSpalato in Dalmatia - Sulla and Diocletian ruled both of equal length, both are brilliant organizers, both appear voluntarily retired from her post. Sullahas eliminated the anarchy of the Marians, as Diocletian's time, the anarchy of the military emperors. And adore both shows itself in her lifetime as agod.Only a few years before Diocletian resigned, he ordered the bloody persecution of Christians, who had experienced the Roman Empire ever. Onewonders, for whatever motive. But that can only be explained so that the unsuccessful suppression of the new faith whose subsequent glorious victory

still leaves appear. And actually seen the new religion under Diocletian's successor Constantine the Great its triumphant victory in Rome.Sulla is settled before Christ - but only apparently. He has also instigated the bloody persecution of another new religion: the proscriptions are nothingmore than the pre-Christian persecutions in Rome. But the bloody suppression of the victory of the new faith could not be prevented, whether thatmeans the Marians-Arian were dogmatic or another direction.Sulla is regarded as deeply religious, almost a Christian ruler. This is shown by the fact that he turns against pagan places of worship. I said was thathe people from the sanctuary of Fortuna in Palestrina, and she hates Primigenia massacre leaves. And on his campaign against Mithridates inGreece, he also plundered Delphi, Olympia and Epidaurus - all famous pagan places of worship. Even Athens, the center of the ancient spiritwhere the rulers ruled only two years and had plenty to do in order to repel the barbarians of the frontiers of the Reich?The answer is found in Diocletian, Diocletian too. This was called before his elevation to the imperial throne of Diocletian (DCLS). Fromentvokalisierten form but it is not difficult DECIUS (DCS) to win - if you know how easy it is read for an L an I. So why the history of the inventor of aChristian persecution of Decius hung! This is, as I said, absurd circumstance of the time, but logically, given the blueprint of the history of design andits reading and reading failure.When we hear the story of Sulla, we immediately think of the history books of the Old Testament: The names SULLA (SL), SAUL (SL) are identical.But their story has a great number of similarities.Saul is a dark character like Sulla, prone to anger, seek to appease the David and his songs too. Saul becomes the first king of Israel, as Sulla firstruler of Rome. Saul also organized large-scale persecution of religious opponents, "Saul, but the land of necromancers and soothsayers had cleaned"(1. Sam. 28, 3) reported that historians laconically excesses that bloody sectarian.As Sulla Saul also has a strong hatred against the priests of Hhenheiligtmem. Like the Roman rulers and priests of the cult of the mountain can bemassacred Praeneste so Saul kills the priests of NOB (NP = PN = Praeneste under Ahimelech. - In the name of the latter lies not only the Hebrewname for King, Melech, but also Hebrew for av Father: So is this Ahimelech also stressed the god-father, whom Arius. Saul's religious activity is also astruggle against the Arians, and therefore depends entirely on the Roman version of the story.

The connections with the Roman rulers in history, Augustus are even more closely with Saul's end. The people of Israel regretted his decision,namely, an individual so much powerThis alone would be a first name of the conspirator illuminating: Catiline. Sergius is a saint of the Eastern Church, and therefore has a right to existonly there!Catiline is discussed in the "ancient" literature not only of Cicero but also by a writer named Sallust, The conspiracy of Catiline, and describes theshape of the end to approve even a degree of historic magnitude. - Sallust describes in another book also Jughurtinischen war against NumidierknigJughurta in North Africa, half a century ago Catiline. - From where did the author of two widely separated events as reliable sources?As we may think of the writings of Sallust, he's definitely a good pre-Christian pagan and Christian. The full name shows it clearly: Gaius Sallust(SLST = CLST) CRISPUS. CLST can be easily discerned in Latin caelestis = heavenly, and in fact represent Latin crispus "curly-haired." - But notbecause of his hair Sallust had this nickname, but because Christ shines through clearly here. The heavenly Christ as pagan Latin author!Back to Cicero. Will be considered a form of classical Roman antiquity. But Catiline these speakers will inevitably put the late Middle Ages. A hugeanachronism is opening.Better not to pursue these unpleasant findings further, one might think. But in Cicero's history one discovers even more strange things. There isanother gloss speech of Marcus Tullius: Pro Rege Deiotaro. It defends against Caesar, Cicero, an Asiatic prince of Galatians, who was accused ofconspiracy against the accuser, but then acquitted. Here the name: Deiotarus, accusative DEIOTARUM = TTR / M = rankles Tatar. - How is it that thegreatest orator of ancient Rome suddenly defending a Tatars from Central Asia?From the pagan Cicero, we know the way, the apostle Paul's Stopping AD = TRES TABERNAS the three taverns, halfway between Pozzuoli andRome. - Cicero is exactly 99Caesar and his Gallic WarsEven more than the sum of Julius Caesar Augustus, Roman TUMS, to some extent the pivotal point in Roman history. And in importance and fame,

he seems to outshine all. This is its role primarily as a military commander and politician, and incidentally also seen as a writer. This overlooks thatCaesar mainly Roman pontiff, was also Pontifex Maximus, and this feature is in geschichtsanalytischer view as most important. Julius Caesar is first agreat religion, administrators, and perhaps the most influential religious leaders, in a sense, the first Roman pope.On the significance of Caesar in the context of history and religion with the invention, there is a profound book by Francesco Carotta Investigation(Carotta, 1999). Here the author proves that the figure of Caesar and his vita find themselves almost literally transformed and misinterpreted in theChristian Gospels - but then runs into the private sphere from the political and religious. In particular, the figure of Jesus of Nazareth appears as oneof his imperial robe bare Julius Caesar: "Between Divus Julius and Jesus, these two God-man who is appearing at the same cultural-historical time inthe same political space, in terms of tradition, a curious complementary asymmetry "(Carotta, 160).Although Carotta the invention of the history and chronology, and the problem of the source tradition does not know his work is an extraordinarily richsource and basis for reflection on the religious-earlier period. The significance of the figure has already been realized in a number of parallels. Boththe Roman Numa Pompilius as Israel's King David in the time that sound heavily on Caesar. And when Caesar had formed a triumvirate with Crassusand Pompey, that is an accurate reflection of the Old Testament Trinity Saul, David and Solomon. However, the parallels here are complex. Mostlikely to equate the two hot-tempered ruler of Saul and Sulla - simply on the basis of their NaDavid, however, has certain traits of Julius Caesar, but aufscheinen very subtle - can seem to no resemblance to manifest itself. The very namesbetray a fundamental kinship. The DIVUS (DVS) is David Julius (DVD) compared to - a difference of only one consonant. And like Caesar's dementia,so grace is praised as David's generosity. David is a great organizer, as well as Caesar, and an equally great commander. Against all the surroundingnations, he goes to war, which he wins of course. David is much older than Caesar, and die a natural death. But if all the stories that were attached tohim - would analyze his duel with the giant Goliath of adultery with Bathesda up to collect his son Solomon the King - would ensure a lot of duplicationin the new days.Looking at Julius Caesar, I noticed that this must have been not only high priest, but also the sun god, or his deputy. Looking for evidence of this notlong have to Caesar's mother was called AURELIA, derived from aureus, golden as the sun.

When Julius Caesar is mentioned, it must be like many other rulers and figures of the fictitious story to ask what is meant. For in the Roman era, thereare several of them. - Was already mentioned Caligula, whose name was right next to his nickname of Gaius Caesar.In the late Roman period, there are two exact replicas of Caesar. These lead to Gaul, as Caesar is well known in this country a long but successfulwar resulted. The Gallic War is a key event and is here particularly concerned.One is the equivalent of Caesar's soldiers Emperor Lucius Domitius Aurelian - supposedly the builders of the impressive, is still preserved in largeparts of the wall ring around Rome. Just as Caesar reigned after Pompey's death or four years, the Aurelian's reign was four years. Aurelian alsoordered First affairs in Gaul - he conquered this land from the Gegenkai -already recognizable in his name, was ass mm of the sun cult concern. Therefore, he also led the worship of the SOL Invictus, the unconquered sun,as the official religion in Rome. - An alleged ancient writers, Aurelius (!) Victor Aurelian explicitly compares with Caesar and Alexander.In addition, Aurelian has a clear parallel in the form of Sulla (see Fomenko, II, 124 f.). The latter name does not contain even SOL, so the sun.Julius Caesar ruled as dictator two years. He is the exact parallel of the late Roman emperor Julian the Apostate. Even this first arranges matters inGaul, moved to Rome and then in the war against the East, where he is in Mesopotamia, said to be by the bite of a spear, killing Woide. - EvenCaesar has been murdered with a sharp object is known, by knife.Julian was a deeply religious ruler who wanted to revive paganism, and therefore also his nickname: Apostala Greek means "the Apostate", where the


9/12

Christian religion, which had apparently triumphed in the Roman Empire "by 360 AD" already. - Julian also served the sun god, he is said to have atalk about the sun takes ver.Julian the Apostate, also wrote an incisive critique of Christianity, Kafa Galileion, which is obviously not preserved in the text, but only in a refutation.Galilee, but Gallia, has figured out how Francesco Carotta. The figures seem to have had Caesar's Gaul, a special relationship to have. So one canask if they have conquered this land, reclaimed or perhaps even acted on behalf of Gaul.Already mentioned was William Kammeier thesis that the Roman Catholic Christianity had arisen in France. - And already the "Roman" WestreichGaul seems to have had as a power center. So, therefore, would be explained by that one Roman emperor and founder of a religion sun in Gaul andGalli -East or on the way to martyrdom. Be - God, or his representative must be a Frenchman, one could also say, thereby giving a clue to the origin ofthese stories and the motives of their origin

Julius Caesar was known, also a writer and has written two important works, the first on the unfinished civil war, De bello civili and mainly the famouscommentators Tarii de bello Galileo.Written by Caesar's Gallic War is a duplicate of the first Gothic war, the Tarquinierkrieges and above all in the Trojan War, as the Fomenko hasextensively proven (Fomenko, II, 266 ff): All these wars began over a woman, so Julia was in Caesar and Pompeja; In the other versions of Helena,Lucretia and Amalasuntha. - In all stories the main Kings - Pompey, Agamemnon, Justinian and Tarquinius Superbus played a role only in thebackground. And in these wars led to a decision before and in a beleaguered city: the case against Caesar, Alesia, in the Gothic war in Rome (orNaples), in-Tarqui nierkrieg course in Rome and of Troy in the Trojan war.It should be noted that the Franks, then the French, who regarded themselves as Trojans. And the Trojans to the legend should have come from thewest.The connection between the story of Caesar's Gallic War and the war of Troy is very tight. In both templates take the big ring for about ten years. Andthe main hero Achilles in the Trojan War appears also transformed with Caesar. There it is the aforementioned Gauls Fortress ALESIA, which isclearly read as a distortion of the Greek heroes (Fomenko, II, 277).By the way is an important strategic venture during its operations in Caesar's Gaul, the expulsion of the Germans, princes Ariovistus. This defeatsJulius Caesar in Sundgau. But Caesar's late Roman counterpart, Julian the Apostate wins in the same landscape at Strasbourg a big victory over theAlemanni.hung of Caesar's text. This is clearly ahead of the French language.In certain Namensmonstern one can only wonder: Since there is a CASSIVELLAUNUS. It puts cassus = vain. -Finally, the resistance of all GaulishCeltic prince was in vain. - But if CASSIVELLAUNUS through, so obviously nothing prevented, also represent an extension toVERCASSIVELLAUNUS!Actually, the secret purpose of these rebel prince has been read out their names. A Arvemerknig means CONCONNETODUMNUS! Once you getused to this tongue-twister, it reads out concocfare, Latin for: concoct concoct something, anything. - A name like AMBIORIX suggests to start

something ambiguous: ambiguus = ambiguous, but also: ambi = ambition.There are also puzzling name, such as the word tapeworm Catamantaloedes, one to the Romans of friendly Se-Quan-Prince.CONNABRE (CN (T), however, makes absolutely no PR problems because you can see behind CANTABRIA.The names of Caesar, to rewrite the thing and already denigrieren them. We have seen that already at Ariovist: systematic reduction of the Germans.- There is also a striking example of the first book in the history of the Helvetians. In addition to the latter, it should have been a tribe of Tigurini,allegedly in the vicinity of Avenches (Aventi-cum) in today's western Switzerland. In Tigurini nothing else but lies tugurium, Latin for "hovel". - Themodern western Switzerland will thank you for this slander!By the way, Caesar, we know that were called the Celtic inhabitants of Switzerland Switzerland (from Helvetii). - As strange would take, as this nameis unraveling. Entvokalisiert he is H / LPT, where the H of the Hebrew definite article. So left-LPT is perhaps TPL. - In Deuteronomy, a landscape isPriest Prieslerstamm is meant. - The third book of Moses is well known, called Leviticus.And Caesar's Gallic Wars to the fact that the Helvetii decide to invade with their entire population and man and horse and carriage, in Gaul. What washer motive? - But surely allude to the exodus of the plebeians from Rome and the exodus of the Israelites from Egypt. The Helvetii people as a priestshould be seen as the Levites.Further evidence to prove the name of religious significance of the exodus of the Helvetii. How should the Helvetii sent two envoys to CaesarNammeius and Verucloetius have (I, 7). NAMMEIUS is quite simply a Latin nomen read to nominis. The second name is also not difficult to decipher:VERUCLOETIUS = = PARACLETUS Paraclete. - So here we again meet with the religious advocates!Secular salvation story of Julius Caesar's Gaul, of course, also contains interesting observations and details about the history and culture of thatcountry. Accurately described as the construction of a Gallic wall, a type of defensive walls, as used by the Celts for their oppida.Or it is said that the locals their population statistics entrenching on bronze plaques. And will be reported elsewhere, such as the Gauls built of denselyaneinandergepflanzten trees Lebhge. - All these communications are valuable and some archaeological evidence. And a Gallic Lebhag still has a

special name in French, it means there un Queule.But the report is summarized by the Gallic War of Julius Caesar, a pamphlet, which shines through abundantly clear trend: After Rome's Gaul, thenFrance, the first country in which the new savior appeared, and a missionary. The French are the first to the leading Christians of the Roman Catholicdirection.rhymes from aem gieicnen Mutor una zeicnneien SICN "aurcn langwemgge-tattlers" off. Next: "detects a human with only a little sense of s tyle in thewomb, but certainly all of these books in one hand. You need these ancient" Masterprieces "never once study can browse an already satisfying"(Baldauf, history and criticism, 83 f.).God Emperor of Rome and the Sun KingsThe Roman history of the kings of the seven kings and the history of the Roman Republic are full of details and allusions salvation. And since the lateRepublican kings Marius and Sulla, the historical events of a series of Christian preaching, to some extent a pre-Christian church history. - The figureof Julius Caesar is probably outstanding, but not unique. It fits perfectly into the religious context.Julius Caesar was formed with Pompey the G

The Criticism

Documents

Transcript of The Criticism