The Courts Hierarchy & Jurisdiction 1 1 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter...

70
The Courts Hierarchy & Jurisdiction 1 1 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4

Transcript of The Courts Hierarchy & Jurisdiction 1 1 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter...

  • Slide 1
  • The Courts Hierarchy & Jurisdiction 1 1 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 2
  • 2 The court hierarchy is a necessary part of the Doctrine of Precedent (lawmaking through courts) Because the process of law-making through courts depends on a decision being made in a higher court which is binding on lower courts. This enables individuals and lawyers to predict the likely outcome of a case. Judges and magistrates can be guided by the wisdom of the more experienced judges in the higher courts. There are state courts and federal courts. The state courts deal with issues which arise under state law. The federal courts deal with disputes which arise under federal law. 2 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 3
  • 3 Reasons for Court Hierarchy 1.Specialisation: Affords Judges, and Magistrates the chance to gain greater skill and expertise in the particular matters they hear and promotes consistency in decision making. 2.Administrative Convenience: Efficient use of resources and personnel. 3.Appeals: The hierarchy allows decisions of a lower court to be reviewed on appeal, if necessary by a higher court/authority. 4.Precedent: The use of past decisions to determine current cases relies heavily on a hierarchical structure. Usually only higher courts set precedent, to be followed by lower courts. Reasons for Court Hierarchy 1.Specialisation: Affords Judges, and Magistrates the chance to gain greater skill and expertise in the particular matters they hear and promotes consistency in decision making. 2.Administrative Convenience: Efficient use of resources and personnel. 3.Appeals: The hierarchy allows decisions of a lower court to be reviewed on appeal, if necessary by a higher court/authority. 4.Precedent: The use of past decisions to determine current cases relies heavily on a hierarchical structure. Usually only higher courts set precedent, to be followed by lower courts. 3 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 4
  • 4 Court Hierarchy ~ Criminal Jurisdiction Jurisdiction refers to the extent of the power of the various courts. Most courts have the jurisdiction to hear both civil and criminal cases. A civil case relates to disputes between individuals, in which one person is claiming that his or her rights have been infringed. A criminal case relates to an offence against society, such as stealing, and is between the Crown and an individual. 4 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 5
  • 5 Magistrates Court (State) All criminal cases come before the Magistrates Court in their first instance. It is the lowest Court in the hierarchy but will hear over 90% of all cases before Victorian Courts The Magistrates Court hears and determines ALL Summary Offences and Indictable Offences heard summarily. It also conducts committal proceedings for other indictable offences, that may be heard at a later date in the County Court or the Supreme Court. A committal hearing is a hearing to determine whether the evidence held by the police is of sufficient weight to support a conviction. If the magistrate decides that there is sufficient evidence against the accused, the case proceeds to trial. If not, the accused is released until such time as the police find additional evidence. It has NO Appellate Jurisdiction 5Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 6
  • 6 Magistrates Court (State) Summary Offences: Generally offences of a less serious nature, heard and determined by a Magistrate. There is no right to a Jury for a Summary Offence. (e.g. Traffic / DUI / Public Order / Minor Drug Offences) Indictable Offences heard summarily: More serious offences, where the accused is entitled to have the charge heard by a Judge and Jury in a higher Court. Some Indictable Offences are triable summarily, meaning they can be heard by the Magistrate in the same way as a Summary Offence. Magistrates can only hear criminal cases in this way with the consent of the accused. Indictable Offences that can be dealt with in this way incl: Theft < $25,000 / Indecent Assault / Theft of a Motor Vehicle 6Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 7
  • 7 Magistrates Court Specialist Courts Koori Court The Koori Court, a division of the Magistrates Court, is available in Shepparton, Warrnambool and Broadmeadows and is only open to Aboriginal defendants who plead guilty. The court hears criminal cases (within the jurisdiction of the Magistrates Court) except those involving sexual offences, domestic violence or a breach of an intervention order. The court is less formal than the Magistrates Court, and is conducted in a round table setting. The Defendant may have the support of a lawyer and a family member. The magistrate can take advice from Aboriginal elders on cultural issues and an appropriate sentence. However, the magistrate is the ultimate decision-maker and uses the same sentencing options as available in the Magistrates Court. 7 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 8
  • 8 Magistrates Court Specialist Courts Drug Court The Drug Court, deals with offenders who have a drug problem. (Well Duh!) A magistrate deals with each case with the assistance of a case manager, community corrections officer, special police prosecutor and defence lawyer. The court deals with offenders who plead guilty to a crime committed under the influence of drugs or to support a drug habit. The crime must not involve a sexual offence or an assault causing bodily harm. The offence must also be within the jurisdiction of the Magistrates Court and punishable by imprisonment. The Drug Court has the power to suspend a term of imprisonment in favour of a 2 year maximum drug treatment order (DTO). 8 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 9
  • 9 Magistrates Court Specialist Courts Family Violence Court The Family Violence Court is a special division of the Magistrates Court Operating in Heidelberg and Ballarat. The court uses specialist magistrates, registrars and trained support staff to provide an integrated support service for family violence victims. The court allows witnesses to give evidence by closed-circuit television or with a person beside them as support. The court can also order a person to leave the court while a witness gives evidence. Children can only attend proceedings at the courts discretion. The court hears all family violence matters within the jurisdiction of the Magistrates Court. 9 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 10
  • 10 Magistrates Court Specialist Courts Neighbourhood Justice Centre Court A Neighbourhood Justice Centre (NJC) Court has been established to hear cases arising in the inner city area of Yarra. It is a multi-jurisdictional court that works in partnership with the local community to resolve legal issues and to provide support services. It draws on the work of volunteers and mediators from the local area. Community representatives helped to select a magistrate who not only presides over the court but also meets regularly with the community to keep abreast of local safety concerns or legal issues. 10 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 11
  • 11 Magistrates Court Specialist Courts Neighbourhood Justice Centre Court The NJC Court is a one-stop court providing a range of services. Its trained staff can assist people who need drug, alcohol, mental health, housing, employment, financial, legal and interpreter services. The NJC Court has the combined jurisdictions of the criminal and civil divisions of the Magistrates Court, the Family Violence Court, the criminal division of the Childrens Court and the Residential Tenancies, Civil Claims and Guardianship lists of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT). The NJC Court can also help victims of crime claim compensation from the Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal (VOCAT). The NJC Court does not deal with committal hearings or serious sexual offences. 11 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 12
  • 12 Magistrates Court Specialist Courts Specialist lists The Magistrates Court has established specialist lists to streamline processes and to maximise the expertise of court personnel or support staff. The specialist lists are generally less formal and more flexible than traditional courts and are designed to make participants feel more comfortable. The Sexual Offences List deals sensitively and fairly with victims of sexual offences and reduces delays to ensure the matter is dealt with quickly. 12 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 13
  • Learning Activity 1 (Page 128) Copy and complete Learning Activity 1 into work books. Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 413
  • Slide 14
  • 14 Magistrates Court (State) Coroners Court (State) The Coroner (a magistrate), has the power to investigate reportable deaths and fires (2003 Bushfires). A reportable death includes; The sudden death of a person. Homicide is suspected, The person was in care (Aged Care / Ward / Prisoner) The identity of the decedent is unknown, Death occurred under prescribed circumstances (Anaesthetic is one), The Attorney-General directs an inquiry be made, The State Coroner directs an inquiry be made. The Coroner can also advise on ways to avoid such deaths in the future, how fires can be avoided in the future, and inform the community of such findings. It has NO Appellate Jurisdiction 14 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 15
  • 15 Magistrates Court (State) Coroners Court (State) Childrens Court (State) The Childrens Court has the power to hear most cases involving children charged with criminal offences. It may also hear cases of young people under 17 considered in need of Care and Protection. The Court can also hear cases dealing with Irreconcilable Differences between child and parent, likely to result in disruption to the young persons care. A child is identified as anyone; Under the age of 18 at the time of an offence, and Under the age of 19 at the time the charge is heard. It has No Appellate Jurisdiction 15 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 16
  • 16 County Court (State) Magistrates Court (State) Coroners Court (State) Childrens Court (State) The County Court has both Original and Appellate jurisdiction. This simply means that it can hear matters that have not been to Court before, as well as those matters previously dealt with in the Magistrates Court. 16 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 17
  • 17 County Court (State) Magistrates Court (State) Coroners Court (State) Childrens Court (State) Criminal Jurisdiction: All criminal offences except the most serious such as Murder / Treason or Attempted Murder. It will in practice deal with the majority of serious criminal cases. In cases where the accused pleads Not Guilty the case is heard by a Judge and a Jury of 12. Appeals: The County Court will hear appeals from the Director of Public Prosecutions against the leniency of a sentence given, as well as appeals against conviction or sentence handed down in the Magistrates Court if it is a criminal matter. 17 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 18
  • 18 Supreme Court of Victoria (State) County Court (State) Magistrates Court (State) Coroners Court (State) Childrens Court (State) Criminal: The Court will deal with the most serious criminal cases such as murder and treason. A Judge and a Jury of 12 will hear cases where the accused pleads Not Guilty. It can also hear matters of public significance. The highest Court in Victoria, the Supreme Court is divided into two divisions; Criminal & Court of Appeal: The Court has the power, for both civil and criminal cases, to hear and determine appeals from the County Court (1 Judge), and the Trial division of the Supreme Court (3-5 Justices) Appeals dealing with a point of law from the Magistrates Court will be heard by a single Judge. The highest Court in Victoria, the Supreme Court is divided into two divisions; Criminal & Court of Appeal. 18 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 19
  • 19 High Court of Australia (Federal) Supreme Court of Victoria (State) County Court (State) Magistrates Court (State) Coroners Court (State) Childrens Court (State) Created under the Constitution, the High Court has the power to hear cases throughout Australia. It has the jurisdiction to act as; Final Court of Appeal from State Supreme Courts and Federal Courts. It has the jurisdiction to act as; Interpreter of the Constitution. This includes determining the meaning of words, the limits of Federal and State Govt powers, as well as determining the validity of Federal and State laws. 19 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 20
  • 20 Original and Appellate Jurisdiction The courts have original and appellate jurisdiction. When a court is hearing a dispute for the first time it is said to be operating in its original jurisdiction (area of power). When a court is hearing an appeal it is said to be operating in its appellate jurisdiction. An appeal allows an individual to take the matter to a higher court to review the original decision. If it is thought necessary, the appellate court (the court hearing the appeal) can reverse the original decision. 20 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 21
  • 21 High Court of Australia (Federal) Supreme Court of Victoria (State) County Court (State) Magistrates Court (State) Coroners Court (State) Children's Court (State) 21 Gleneagles Secondary College Yr 11 - Legal Studies Chapter 4
  • Slide 22
  • The Courtroom 22
  • Slide 23
  • The Criminal Trial 23
  • Slide 24
  • The Criminal Trial 24 County & Supreme Courts
  • Slide 25
  • The Criminal Trial 25 Judge / Justice Referred to as Your Honour. Normally wears a wig and gown. Their role is to ensure that the rights of the accused, and witnesses are protected. They make rulings on points of law pertinent to the case In a Criminal case, It is the Judge who decides on the ultimate sanction after weighing the evidence.
  • Slide 26
  • The Criminal Trial 26 Judges Associate A personal assistant and research officer. Chosen and appointed by the Judge. Usually qualified lawyers, but this is not necessary. They announce the Charges.
  • Slide 27
  • The Criminal Trial 27 Tipstaff Maintains order in the court. Calls witnesses and attends to the jury. Supreme Court they wear a formal grey coat, County wear green.
  • Slide 28
  • The Criminal Trial 28 Public Seating
  • Slide 29
  • The Criminal Trial 29 Crown Prosecutor Barristers present in open court on behalf of their client. Crown Prosecutors present the case against the accused on Behalf of the state.
  • Slide 30
  • The Criminal Trial 30 Defence Barrister
  • Slide 31
  • The Criminal Trial 31 Instructing Solicitors Members of the Prosecution/Defence team. They provide advice/info to the Barristers, as it is probably they who have done the majority of preparation.
  • Slide 32
  • The Criminal Trial 32 Witness One with knowledge of the event, specialist or expert knowledge that may assist. They will be questioned by both sides. Evidence-In-Chief Cross-Examination Re-Examination
  • Slide 33
  • The Criminal Trial 33 Jury 12 persons selected at random from the electoral roll. 12 for Criminal trials, although 15 can be selected for longer
  • Slide 34
  • 34
  • Slide 35
  • Procedures for Criminal Procedures 35
  • Slide 36
  • 36 The Hearing: A hearing is a judicial examination and determination of a case, reaching a decision in a court of summary jurisdiction (that is, the Magistrates Court). The hearing does not itself determine guilt, rather than the fitness of the accused to face trial, and the suitability of the charges, or jus veritas of the charges against the accused. (i.e. Is there a prima facie case)
  • Slide 37
  • 37 Mention hearing A person who has been charged with a summary offence or an indictable offence that can be heard summarily will be brought before the Magistrates Court for a mention hearing. The defendant can choose to enter no plea or can indicate how he or she will plead, guilty or not guilty. If the defendant is pleading guilty, the matter may be dealt with immediately, or adjourned until later for a plea of guilty hearing, depending on the number of witnesses to be called and the time it is likely to take. If the defendant is pleading not guilty, or enters no plea, the case is postponed to a full contested hearing date.
  • Slide 38
  • 38
  • Slide 39
  • 39 The Hearing: If a defendant indicates prior to the mention day that he or she intends to plead not guilty the matter goes straight to a contest mention hearing. The parties are called together and asked to discuss issues relevant to the case and to Inform the court of the number of witnesses to be called. The prosecution will indicate the strength of their case against the defendant. The defendant may at this stage decide to change his/her mind and enter a plea of guilty. Under the Sentencing Act, sentences are discounted if a person pleads guilty. If the defendant continues to plead not guilty the matter is sent to a full contested hearing.
  • Slide 40
  • 40 The Hearing: Uncontested hearings in the Magistrates Court In most cases the defendant pleads guilty. If this is the case, the main witness for the prosecution may outline the evidence against the defendant. Character witnesses may be called on behalf of the defendant and the magistrate decides on a sentence. In some cases the parties may agree to have the case dealt with through a diversion program.
  • Slide 41
  • 41 The Hearing: Contested hearings in the Magistrates Court Cases which are brought before the Magistrates Court are known as full contested hearings. These occur when the defendant pleads not guilty. the case is called and appearances are entered The case begins with the calling-on of the case when the defendants name is called and the prosecutor announces that s/he appears on behalf of the informant. The defendants legal representative announces that s/he appears on behalf of the defendant. the charges are read and a plea is entered The offences with which the defendant has been charged are read out from the charge sheet. The defendant is asked, How do you plead, guilty or not guilty?. The defendants response is entered in the court records.
  • Slide 42
  • 42 The Hearing: Contested hearings in the Magistrates Court all witnesses are asked to leave the court The defendant remains, and members of the public, who are not participating in the hearing, can stay. the prosecution calls its witnesses Each witness is sworn in, this involves the witness swearing an oath, or making an affirmation if the witness does not hold religious beliefs, being examined-in-chief (by the prosecutor, to adduce evidence ), cross-examined (by the defendants solicitor) and re-examined (by the prosecutor).
  • Slide 43
  • 43
  • Slide 44
  • 44 The Hearing: No case to answer After the prosecution has presented their case the defendant can submit to the court that there is no case to answer because the prosecution did not establish a prima facie case. If the court does not accept the submission the defence presents their case. The defence calls its witnesses Each witness is sworn in, examined-in chief (by the defendants solicitor), cross-examined (by the prosecutor) and re-examined (by the defendants lawyer). The defendant can choose to give sworn evidence and be cross-examined, or remain silent.
  • Slide 45
  • 45 The Hearing: Final addresses are made The prosecutor and the defendants lawyer address the court, making submissions on questions of law. The magistrate states whether the case is proven (decides whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty) If not guilty the defendant is free to go (unless s/he is in custody for another offence). If the defendant is found guilty, sentencing follows. The defendants record is disclosed The defendant stands while any prior convictions are read out.
  • Slide 46
  • 46 The Hearing: A plea in mitigation of sentence is made The defendants lawyer will make a plea as to the appropriate sentence. Sometimes witnesses are called during pre-sentencing to give evidence of the good character of the defendant. Character references may also be submitted to the court. The magistrate sentences the defendant The magistrate announces the penalty, and if appropriate makes other orders such as restitution to a victim (paying the cost of repairing damage caused by the defendant).
  • Slide 47
  • 47 The Trial: All criminal cases to be heard in the County Court and Supreme Court are known as trials. There are a number of pre-trial procedures, such as a committal hearing, which take place before a case goes to trial.
  • Slide 48
  • 48 The Trial: Criminal procedures in the County Court and Supreme Court are known as trials. Before a matter goes to trial in the County Court or Supreme Court, a committal proceeding has usually taken place and the Office of Public Prosecutions (OPP) has issued a presentment. An accused person can request that the director of public prosecution (DPP) omit the committal proceeding, but this is unusual. If the accused is pleading not guilty in the County Court or Supreme Court the procedure is as follows.
  • Slide 49
  • 49 The Trial: The case is called and appearances are entered The prosecutor (barrister acting on behalf of the OPP) announces that s/he appears on behalf of the Crown. The defence counsel (accuseds barrister) announces that s/he appears on behalf of the accused. The accused is arraigned (arraignment) The name of the accused called out and the charges in the presentment are read out. The accused is asked to plead guilty or not guilty. If the accused pleads not guilty the trial proceeds. If the accused pleads guilty, the prosecution presents a summary of the evidence, prior convictions are read out and a sentence is decided.
  • Slide 50
  • 50 The Trial: A jury is empanelled The jury is chosen from a pool of jurors. In criminal cases there are 12 jurors, although up to 15 jurors may be empanelled for any reason that appears to the court to be good and sufficient. This allows the trial to proceed if jurors become ill or die (a trial can continue if a jury reduces to 10; any lower, and a retrial must be ordered). Opening addresses are made The prosecutor gives an opening address telling the jurors what the case is about, and refers to important witnesses and evidence. The defence replies to the prosecutors opening address. The defence counsel has the right to reply to the opening speech of the prosecutor to outline issues in the trial and indicate briefly the facts, and the inferences which can be made from those facts, that are not contested.
  • Slide 51
  • 51 The Trial: The judge addresses the jury The presiding judge must address the jury on the issues in the trial and the relevance of any admissions made, directions given or matters decided during the directions hearings. The prosecutor calls the crown witnesses Each witness is sworn in (this involves the witness swearing an oath, or making an affirmation if the witness does not hold religious beliefs), being examined-in-chief (by the prosecutor), cross-examined (by the defence counsel) and re-examined (by the prosecutor). A no-case submission may be made If the defence counsel feels that the prosecution has not proved the guilt of the accused, s/he can submit to the court that there is no case to answer. If this is accepted by the court, the charge is dismissed; if not, the case proceeds.
  • Slide 52
  • 52 The Trial: Defence counsel calls witnesses Each witness is sworn in, examination in- chief (by defence counsel), cross-examined (by the prosecutor) and re-examined (by defence counsel). The accused can choose to give sworn evidence and be cross-examined, or remain silent. Evidence in reply may be called The court may allow the prosecutor to call evidence in reply to evidence given by the defence that could not reasonably have been foreseen by the prosecutor from the defence response given before the trial. Closing addresses are made The prosecutor and the defence counsel address the court with closing speeches. The prosecutor addresses the court first. Both counsel explain to the jury the important parts of the evidence that support their case. They also address the judge on the relevant points of law.
  • Slide 53
  • 53 The Trial: The judge sums up and directs the jury The trial judge sums up, explaining the relevant points of law to the jurors. The explanation includes the burden of proof, the standard of proof and the main points relating to the offence. If the trial judge believes that there is insufficient evidence against the accused for a jury to return a guilty verdict, s/he can direct the jury to acquit the accused. The jury does not have to follow this direction (although in practice the jury does follow it). The judge cannot direct the jury to find a verdict of guilty. A judge may set aside a jury verdict if it is manifestly unsafe at law, and find otherwise on the basis of the evidence before the court.
  • Slide 54
  • 54 The Trial: The jury retires to consider its verdict The jurors go into the jury room. They may request copies of various documents to assist them in their deliberations. The jury must: discuss all the evidence decide on questions of fact, that is whether they believe the accused is guilty or not guilty according to the evidence apply the law reach a verdict. The jury gives its verdict If the accused is found not guilty, he or she is free to leave the court, and cannot be tried again for the same offence (double jeopardy rule). If the accused is found guilty, prior convictions are heard. Prior to sentencing, a plea for leniency may be made and character witnesses may be called. Sentencing The trial judge passes sentence.
  • Slide 55
  • The Adversary System 55
  • Slide 56
  • 56 The Westminster system utilises an ADVERSARIAL concept Two sides (civil or criminal) battle to determine who wins. Criminal: Prosecution win = Guilty Verdict Defence win = Not Guilty Verdict Civil: Prosecution win = Plaintiff wins Defence win = Defendant wins
  • Slide 57
  • 57 Party Control: Each side has control of their case. Following rules of evidence, each side can decide; how to invesitagte/present the facts how many witnessess are required what sort of evidence to present the need for legal representation, and methods to be used to adduce evidence
  • Slide 58
  • 58 Role of the Judge: An impartial adjudicator, Present to control the case and rule on points of law. Ensure fair treatment for both parties
  • Slide 59
  • 59 Rules of evidence and procedure: Only evidence relevant to the case may be presented. Prior convictions are not heard until sentencing as they may bias the Court. Propensity evidence may be allowed under some circumstances if it can be shown that the accused has a propensity for a similar offence. Hearing evidence Examination in Chief ~ Questioning of own witness Cross Esamination ~ Demonstrate flaws in opposition case Re-Examination ~ Clarify points from the cross
  • Slide 60
  • 60 Equal representation: If the system is to work effectively, both sides must have equal (or close to) representation. If there is an imbalance the side with the most skilled/experienced representation may out due to the lack of skills in their opponent. Appeals can be used to address this imbalance but are very costly
  • Slide 61
  • 61 Advantages: Truth should emerge through skillful questioning Reliant on oral evidence Parties in control of their own case Impartial decision makers
  • Slide 62
  • 62 Disadvantages: Unequal representation Truth may not emerge Oral evidence is flawed (understanding/language) High Cost Legal expertise of Judges is under utlised
  • Slide 63
  • 63 Advantages: Truth should emerge through skillful questioning Reliant on oral evidence Parties in control of their own case Impartial decision makers
  • Slide 64
  • 64 The Jury System: Our legal system is predicated on the concept of both Trial By Jury and Trial By Ones Peers
  • Slide 65
  • 65 The Jury System: Juries are used in the original jurisdiction of both County and Supreme Courts NOT PART of the Magistrates Courts. NOT USED in appeals Compulsory composition of 12 in criminal cases where the accused pleads Not Guilty
  • Slide 66
  • 66 The Jury System: A criminal jury MUST try for a unanimous verdict!! If not a majority decision for crimes other than Commonwealth offences, Treason or Murder. A majority is 11 of 12 A hung jury occurs if the majority can not be made. This means neither Guilt or Innocence and the accused can be retied later
  • Slide 67
  • 67 The Jury System: The finding of guilt must be BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT If a juror has any doubt, no matter how small, they MUST determine the accused NOT GUILTY
  • Slide 68
  • 68 The Jury System: In Civil cases a jury of six can be used, but is optional. Either side can choose to empannel a jury. A civil jury can reach a majority verdict of 5 to 1. Civil cases are determined on the Balance of Probabilities
  • Slide 69
  • 69 The Jury System: Ineligible - prospective juror can not understand the task or because of their occupation (law or related) Disqualified prisoners of more than three years, or having been goaled for 3 mths + in the last five years. Undischarged bankrupts Excused See Pge 133
  • Slide 70
  • 70