How did Shay’s Rebellion expose the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation
The Constitution Ch 1.3. Monday February 6, 2012 Daily goal: Understand the major weaknesses of the...
-
Upload
marcia-jennings -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of The Constitution Ch 1.3. Monday February 6, 2012 Daily goal: Understand the major weaknesses of the...
Monday February 6, 2012
• Daily goal: Understand the major weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, the importance of Shay’s Rebellion and the 3 major compromises needed to ratify the Constitution.
• Think About it…• Rate the effectiveness of your mock gov’t: what
did it do well, what could it have done better, how much better could it be if you were given a 2nd attempt at it?
Tuesday February 7th, 2012
• Daily goal: Understand how the Constitution separated powers into the 3 branches and the responsibilities of each branch. Understand what individual and state’s rights are protected by the Bill of Rights.
• Think About it…• How do beginners and experts think about
things differently?
Notes Analysis
• History isn’t easy to understand if you are merely trying to memorize every fact.
• If you understand how those facts work together and have a larger meaning it is much more easily understood.
• Answer the question using your notes (and the textbook if necessary) by providing evidence and establishing the relationships between important ideas from your notes.
Notes Analysis
• Use your Ch 1.3 notes and explain why the Articles of Confederation was replaced by the Constitution in 2-3 sentences.
• 1 piece of evidence from the notes minimum.
Notes Analysis Sample
• The Articles of Confederation’s inability to collect taxes and raise an army made it too weak to effectively govern the country. This became very clear when the government struggled to put down Shay’s rebellion. made it clear how weak and in need of revision the Articles were.
7
IN 1777 THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION WERE
WRITTEN BY THE SECOND CONTINENTAL CONGRESS
AS THE FIRST INDEPENDENT
GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. IT WAS
OFFICIALLY ADOPTED IN 1781.
Articles of Confederation
• After winning their freedom from a powerful gov’t, America did not tyranny again.
• It created a weak government called the Articles of Confederation that could not:
• Collect Taxes• Raise an Army• Enforce Treaties• Regulate Business• Print Money
Shay’s Rebellion
• Many farmers lost their land to foreclosure because of high taxes. They began a violent rebellion protesting the new taxes.
• The federal gov’t struggled to put down the rebellion quickly, it became clear the Articles of Confederation were weak.
10
55 DELEGATES MET IN PHILADELPHIA IN SEPTEMBER 1787 AND DECIDED TO DRAFT A NEW CONSTITUTION RATHER THAN REVISE
THE ARTICLES
GEORGE WASHINGTON WAS
CHOSEN AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE
CONVENTION
SOME OF THE DELEGATES FROM VARIOUS STATES
Constitutional Convention
• Delegates met in Philadelphia to fix the Articles of Confederation, but decided to start over.
• The delegates agreed they needed a stronger federal gov’t.
12
DEBATE OVER REPRESENTATION IN CONGRESS
VIRGINIA PLAN• LARGE STATE
• BICAMERAL
• FAVORED NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVES
ALLOTTED BASED ON POPULATION
NEW JERSEY PLAN• SMALL STATE
• UNICAMERAL
• EQUAL NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR
EACH STATE
13
THE GREAT COMPROMISE
THE DELEGATES AGREED ON TWO HOUSES IN CONGRESS, THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES.
THE SENATE WOULD HAVE EQUAL REPRESENTATION, MEANING EVERY STATE
WAS ALLOTTED 2 SENATORS.
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WOULD BE BASED ON POPULATION AND THEREFORE
THE NUMBER WOULD VARY FROM STATE TO STATE.
Great Compromise
• Big states wanted representation based on population, while small states wanted equal representation for each state.
• The solution was the Great Compromise- there would be two houses in Congress:
• The House of Representatives- based on population.
• Senate- 2 representatives per state.
3/5ths Compromise
• Now the question became whether or not slaves would be counted in the Southern population for representation.
• For every 5 slaves, 3 would count as free people for representation.
16
DEBATE OVER RATIFICATION
FEDERALISTSADVOCATED A STRONG CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT
NATIONAL SUPREMACY
IN FAVOR OF RATIFICATION
BILL OF RIGHTS UNNECESSARY SINCE GOVERNMENT HAD LIMITED
POWERS
MADISON, HAMILTON, JAY
ANTIFEDERALISTSIN FAVOR OF STRONG STATE
GOVERNMENTS
STATE SUPREMACY
AGAINST RATIFICATION
BILL OF RIGHTS ESSENTIAL TO GUARANTEE CITIZEN’S RIGHTS
MASON, CLINTON, HENRY