The Concept of Runoff Elements As a Basis of Scale-Free Approach To Runoff Formation Modelling the...
-
Upload
thomasine-mcbride -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
1
Transcript of The Concept of Runoff Elements As a Basis of Scale-Free Approach To Runoff Formation Modelling the...
The Concept of Runoff Elements The Concept of Runoff Elements As a Basis of Scale-Free Approach As a Basis of Scale-Free Approach
To Runoff Formation ModellingTo Runoff Formation Modelling
the experience of “Hydrograph” model the experience of “Hydrograph” model development and implementationdevelopment and implementation
Yu.B. Vinogradov, O. SemenovaYu.B. Vinogradov, O. Semenova
State Hydrological InstituteState Hydrological Institute
St. Petersburg, RussiaSt. Petersburg, Russia
To describe the water dynamics in river basin
- slope and channel transformation
Scientific objectiveScientific objective
Modelling objectiveModelling objective
To estimate the water income to channel system and
finally to the basin outlet
Main tasksMain tasks
1. Infiltration, water movement in the soil layer, formation of classical surface and subsurface flow
2. Slope (surface, subsurface and underground) inflow to channel network3. Channel flow and lag time
Main modelling lawsMain modelling laws
• Adequacy to natural processes
• The parameters of the equations should not
depend on the argument
• Use of only available data (otherwise,
simplification of the model)
The basic equations of water dynamicsThe basic equations of water dynamicsin a “physically-based” models…in a “physically-based” models…
violation of the main modelling rules?violation of the main modelling rules?
• Water dynamics in soil – the Richard’s equation
• Slope and channel flow – the equation of Saint-Venant or kinematic wave
• Underground flow – the Boussinesq equation
The Richard’s equation The Richard’s equation (moisture diffusion/conductivity)(moisture diffusion/conductivity)
z
Kz
D
t
)()(
– volume moistureD() – moisture diffusion coefficient K( ) – hydraulic conductivity t – time, z – soil depth
• Parallel between the “diffusion of soil water” and heat
conductivity – suspended moisture existence is impossible?
• The Hallaire's effect
• Nonlinearly dependence of D and K on
• Change of D in 104 and K in 106 - 107 times corresponds to
the range of natural variation of
t - time, x – distance, H – depth, V – velocity, q – inflow, C – Chezy coefficient,
The equation of Saint-Venant The equation of Saint-Venant (kinematic wave, etc…)(kinematic wave, etc…)
• Water movement is represented by thin continuous water layer
• Disagreement between units of flow depth (mm) and grid sizes
(km)
• Requirement for absent information (morphology, roughness)
• No possibility to evaluate the described process except by runoff
in the outlet
• Need of calibration – different methods – different parameters
• Exaggeration of slope distances and underestimation of slope
inclination in spatial schematization
)(sin||
21 2
x
Hg
H
Vq
HC
VVg
x
VV
t
V
q
x
VH
x
HV
t
H
– coefficients1 2
The Boussinesq equationThe Boussinesq equation
• True structure of the underground aquifers is unknown
• Information on quantity and stratigraphy of impervious beds
and aquifers (capacity, inclinations, connection with
underground and external channel system, filtration and
water yield coefficients) is required and ABSENT
• The fact of great groundwater storage is not taken into
account
xxH
HK
t
H
K, – filtration and water yield coefficients of rock, H – level of ground waters over the surface of impervious bed or piezometric head in the case of heady movement, t – time, x – distance
What fee do we pay for the What fee do we pay for the ““physical base” of such models?physical base” of such models?
•Nonlinearity•Uniqueness•Uncertainty•Equifinality
•Scale [Beven, 2001]
Is not it a time for some other methods? Is not it a time for some other methods?
Should we stop to pretend for Should we stop to pretend for our knowledge of real runoff processes?our knowledge of real runoff processes?
The concept of runoff elementsThe concept of runoff elements
Basin – elementary slopes or watersheds – runoff elements system
Runoff element:Runoff element:• Natural formation
• Part of elementary slope limited by micro-divides directed with its open part to the slope non-channel or underground drainage system
• The size depends on natural conditions but mainly inclination (the underground runoff elements are much larger than surface ones)
qsdt
dw
1)exp( wq
For each runoff element there is a balance ratio (1)
W – water volume (m3), s and q – inflow and outflow (m3s-1); t – time (s).
(2)
, - hydraulic parameters of a runoff element.
a = /n and b = n, where n is a number of runoff elements.
a = a*/F and b = b*F, T = 1/(a* b*), H = ln(q/b*+1)/a*
a* [m-1], b* [ms-1] – standardized hydraulic coefficients, F – area, T – typical outflow time, H – water storage
Q from all runoff elements of the given level to channel system is:
bbStabQQS
bSQ
)](exp[)]()([1 00
(3)
Q - initial value of runoff Q and S is runoff formation intensity (m3s-1); t - computation time interval (sec) during which S is constant.
AssumptionsAssumptions
with the depth…with the depth…
• The infiltration capacity of water-holding rocks naturally decreases
• The outflow rate decreases
• The water storage increases
System of runoff elementsSystem of runoff elements
LevelType
of runoffa* τ Water
storage, mm
Outflow intensity, mm/min
- Surface 1000 17 min 4.6 6.0
- Soil 100 2.8 hours 24 0.6
1-3 Rapid ground
10 – 11.2–11.6
days69.3–195
(1 – 0.22)*6*10-2
4-6Ground 0.32 – 0.032
1.2months – 1 year
301–674
(1 – 0.22)*6*10-3
7-9 Upper underground
0.01 – 10-3 3.2–32 years
995–2152
(1 – 0.22)*6*10-4
10-12 Deep underground
3.2*10-4–3.2*10-5
100–1000 years
3161– 6812
(1 – 0.22)*6*10-5
13-15Historical underground
10-5 – 10-6
3200–32000 years
10000– 21450
(1 – 0.22)*6*10-6
parameter b* is constant
• It is a schematization in the conditions of full
uncertainty.• It doesn’t contradict the known hydro-geological
items (structure and water storage).• It corresponds to observed curves of runoff
depletion for the basins of various sizes.• It corresponds to the materials of isotope
hydrology on residence time.• It works for different scales and conditions…!
The concept of runoff elements – The concept of runoff elements – what is that?what is that?
Some results…Some results…
Observed (black)Observed (black)
againstagainst simulated (red)simulated (red)
hydrograpshydrograps
7 Viluy
136000
9 Vitim
186000
6 Uchur
108000
5 Amga
65000
1 Katyryk
40
3 Ebetiem
1000
14 Lena
2430000
L a p t e vS e a
C H I N A
2 Timpton
613
8 Lena (Zmeinovo)
140000
12 Kolyma
526000
11 Indigirka
305000
13 Aldan
696000
10 Yana
216000
4 Suntar
7680
SMALL
MIDDLE
LARGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
Study areaStudy area
LARGE-SCALE BASINSLARGE-SCALE BASINS
Lena at KusurLena at Kusur basin area basin area 2,4 2,4 millionmillion km km22
Рассчитанный Наблюденный
1E5
5E4
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
2E5
1E5
5E4
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
1E5
5E4
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
1E5
5E4
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
Q
Т
1977 1978
1979 1980
Aldan at Verkhoyansky Aldan at Verkhoyansky PerevozPerevoz
basin area basin area 696000696000 km km22
40000
30000
20000
10000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
30000
20000
10000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
30000
20000
10000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
40000
30000
20000
10000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
Q
T
1978 1979
1980 1981
1978 1979
1980 1981
Kolyma at KolymskoyeKolyma at Kolymskoye, , basin area basin area 526000526000 km km22
30000
20000
10000
0XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
20000
15000
10000
5000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
20000
15000
10000
5000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
Q
T
1977 1978
1979 1980
1977 1978
1979 1980
Indigirka at VorontsovoIndigirka at Vorontsovo basin area basin area 315000315000 km km22
8000
6000
4000
2000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
8000
6000
4000
2000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
6000
4000
2000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
15000
10000
5000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
Q
T
1981 1982
1983 1984
1981 1982
1983 1984
Yana at Dgangky, Yana at Dgangky, basin area basin area 216000216000 kmkm22
8000
6000
4000
2000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
6000
4000
2000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
6000
4000
2000
0XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
6000
4000
2000
0XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
Q
T
1970 1971
1972 1973
1970 1971
1972 1973
MIDDLE-SCALE BASINSMIDDLE-SCALE BASINS
Vitim at BodayboVitim at Bodaybo, , basin area basin area 186000186000 km km22
10000
5000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
10000
5000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
15000
10000
5000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
Q
T
1980 1981
1982 1983
1980 1981
1982 1983
Uchur at Chyul’buUchur at Chyul’bu,,basin area basin area 108000108000 km km22
15000
10000
5000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
15000
10000
5000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
10000
5000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
15000
10000
5000
XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
Q
T
1981 1982
1983 1984
1981 1982
1983 1984
SMALL-SCALE BASINSSMALL-SCALE BASINSSuntar at Sakharynia Suntar at Sakharynia
river mouthriver mouth, , basin area basin area 76807680 km km22
1000
800
600
400
200
0XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
1000
800
600
400
200
0XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
400
300
200
100
0XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
1500
1000
500
0XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
Q
T
1959 1960
1961 1962
1959 1960
1961 1962
Timpton at Nagorny, Timpton at Nagorny, basin area basin area 613613 km km22
100
50
0XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
100
50
0XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
250
200
150
100
50
0XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
200
150
100
50
0XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
Q
T
1977 1978
1979 1980
1977 1978
1979 1980
Katyryk at TokoKatyryk at Toko, , basin area basin area 40.240.2 km km22
Рассчитанный Наблюденный
10
5
0 XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
5
0 XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
10
5
0 XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
10
5
0 XIIXIXIXVIIIVIIVIVIVIIIIII
Q
Т
1981 1982
1983 1984
Statistics on observed vs simulated flow Statistics on observed vs simulated flow (averaged for all basins in Eastern Siberia)(averaged for all basins in Eastern Siberia)
Daily Year
Nash-Sutcliffe 0.78 0.93
Relative error (in absolute value)
36 % 10 %
• to state the fact of specific complexity and
unsolveness of the problem• to state the weakness of traditional “physically-
based” approaches
• to arise the critique and following to arise the critique and following
discussion on the problemdiscussion on the problem
We aimed:We aimed:
And finally, we are looking for:And finally, we are looking for:
serious cooperation in order to test our approach on
isotope data
Thank you for your attention!Thank you for your attention!