The College Ready Promise
description
Transcript of The College Ready Promise
THE COLLEGE READY PROMISE
The Running Record & Global Scholar: Evaluate
Shared Norms• Participants will
• Keep an open mind and be solution oriented• Actively engage in discussion• Assume the best of colleagues• Work collaboratively with the interest of sharing and
creating best signature practices
Global ScholarObjectives 1• Teachers will learn about the changes in the evaluation
scoring system• Teachers will review the decision making process
(Teacher Advisory Panel, Leadership Team, Management)• Teachers will practice using the Running Record• Teachers will review a sample of the Running Record
The Global Scholar-Evaluate System• 2011-2012
• No option for differentiated observations that could impact final scores• S2 scores overwrote all S1 scores
• 2012-2013• Teachers will be observed informally
• One indicator will be school wide• 3 indicators will be selected by teacher and coach/observer and will be observed
twice per semester informally and once per semester formally.• Evidence will be scored on a running record• Scores can increase or decrease scores by .5• Teacher receives differentiated support and feedback on the most high need
areas (additional opportunities for collaboration and conferences with observers)
• The remaining indicators will be governed by the same rules (S2 overwrites S1).
What’s New? The Running Record
38 Indicators, 4 levels of
performance
Framework for Effective Teaching6
Domain 1 Data-Driven Planning and Preparation
Standard 1.1 Establish standards-based learning objectives for instructional plans
IndicatorsA) Selection of objectivesB) Measurability of objectives
4 Domains
17 Standards
7
Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness
Observation of Teacher Practice;
40%
Parent and Family Feedback; 10%
Student Feedback ; 10%
Individual Teacher SGP; 30%
School-Wide Subject SGP; 10%
Observation of Teacher Practice; 50%
Parent and Family Feedback; 10%
Stu-dent Feed
back ; 10%
School-Wide ELA SGP; 25%
School-Wide Math SGP; 5%
CST-Tested Subjects Non-CST-Tested Subjects
A Design To Increase the Opportunities for Support: The Running Record• Each score in the running record can impact the overall rating• Unannounced and Formal observations can increase or decrease
scores by 0.5• Formal observation not part of the running record: S2 overwrites S1.• Review the sample below of one differentiated observation and one
formal observation.
Standards IndicatorsObservation Date
Mid Year
Final
ScoringObserver Name Admin1 Admin1 Admin1 Admin1 Admin1 Admin1
Observation Type UN F UN UN UN F
3.3 Implementation of instructional strategies
A) QuestioningObservation Rating 1 2 1 3 2 3
Overall Rating
B) Academic discourseObservation Rating
Overall Rating
C) Group structuresObservation Rating 2 3
Overall Rating 2 3
D) Resources and instructional materials
Observation Rating
Overall Rating
Sample Running Record
11
Overall Teacher Effectiveness Determination
CST-Tested Teachers Non-CST Tested Teachers
30% Teacher SGP 25% School-Wide ELA SGP
10% School-Wide SGP for Subject
5% School-Wide Math SGP
40% Average of Teacher Effectiveness Ratings
50% Average of Teacher Effectiveness Ratings
10% Student Survey 10% Student Survey
10% School-Wide Parent Survey
10% School-Wide Parent Survey
12
Teacher Effectiveness Levels
Effectiveness Level Performance Band
Highly Effective 3.6-4.0
Effective 3.0-3.59
Achieving 2.5-2.9
Emerging 2.0-2.49
Entry <2.0
Getting Startedhttps://tcrp.globalscholar.com
What’s new? Informal (diff) Observations• On the agenda screen. Click “informal observation”
Generating a report
• Provides running record data for your conferences and coaching
• Select reports, year, school, and teacher• Be sure to save the pdf version to view all indicators
Sample teacher report
Selecting teachers
Use the search box or browse the teacher list to select the teacher being observed, click on the corresponding name, and it will prompt you to choose an evaluation section as shown
below.
Professional Growth Plan
To provide support to teachers by focusing on specific professional skills and goals known as focus areas.
Currently exists as an uploaded document that should be viewed by observers prior to the pre conference.
Formal Observation
Lesson Plan Submission
• Teachers will upload their Lesson Plans, which will need to be approved by the Evaluators
Lesson Plan Submission• Once submitted and approved, the Observer can go in to download and view the Lesson Plan• Teachers should self score with the submission of their lesson plan, before delivery of the
lesson
Steps 2-4Lesson Plan Review, Pre-Observation Conference and Classroom Observation: Scoring and notes
Narrative/Quick note input
Domains and indicators
Self scoring:teachers complete by stage 6observers view by stage 8
Click on the Indicator
Teachers will click on the level in which they think they should be scored
Teachers can validate their scoring with notes and evidence
Reflection submission• Teachers will need to submit their Reflection Evidence prior to the Post Observation
Conference
Observer Preliminary Scoring
• Observers score teachers and add in notes on all 38 indicators
Post-observation and Informal Observation Conference
• View evidence, notes, and scores for each indicator
Let’s take a look at a sample
Now log on