The case for change Time to Think Differently .

38
The case for change Time to Think Differently www.kingsfund.org.uk/think

Transcript of The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Page 1: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

The case for change

Time to Think Differentlywww.kingsfund.org.uk/think

Page 2: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Major progress has been made in improving the performance of the NHS in the past decade.

Page 3: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Waiting times for treatment in hospital have fallen dramatically and generally remain stable.

Page 4: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Hospital-acquired infection rates like MRSA have fallen dramatically.

Page 5: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

The NHS continues to be highly valued by the public.

Source: Ipsos Mori 2013

Page 6: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

The NHS continues to perform well on most indicators when compared to other countries.

Page 7: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

However, the current health and social care delivery system has failed to keep pace with the needs of an ageing population, the changing burden of disease, and rising patient and public expectations.

Page 8: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Fundamental change is needed. It is time to think differently.

Page 9: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

The case for change is compelling:

1. Variations in quality and outcomes of care

2. Funding pressures3. Delivery system not fit for the future4. Future trends – magnifying the

pressures

Page 10: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

1. Variations in quality and outcomes of care

Page 11: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

‘The UK has the second highest rate of mortality amenable to health care in 16 high-income nations.’

Source: Nolte and McKee 2011

Page 12: The case for change Time to Think Differently .
Page 13: The case for change Time to Think Differently .
Page 14: The case for change Time to Think Differently .
Page 15: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

For many diseases, there is unwarranted variation.

Page 16: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

There are wide variations in performance and gaps in the quality of care of general practice.

Page 17: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

2. Funding pressures

Page 18: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Current spending projections suggest significant financial pressures on services for the next 20 years.

Page 19: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Historic pressures to increase NHS spending.

Source: Appleby 2012

Page 20: The case for change Time to Think Differently .
Page 21: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Increasing pressure to achieve productivity gains.

By 2015£20

billionNicholson challenge for productivity

gains

By 2021£30

billion more

NHS England estimates of a funding gap

Page 22: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Projected spending on long-term care 2016/17–2061/2

Source: OBR 2012

Page 23: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

3. Delivery system not fit for the future

Page 24: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

A significant proportion of patients occupying beds do not need to be in hospital on clinical grounds.

Source: Goddard et al 2000; Audit Commission 2003

Page 25: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

The separation between general practitioners and hospital-based specialists, and between health and social care, often inhibit the provision of timely and high-quality, integrated care to people who need to access a range of services relevant to their needs.

Source: Ham et al 2012

Page 26: The case for change Time to Think Differently .
Page 27: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

There are significant problems with standards of dignity and care.

Page 28: The case for change Time to Think Differently .
Page 29: The case for change Time to Think Differently .
Page 30: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Obesity is associated with an increased risk of diseases including diabetes, heart disease, osteoarthritis and cancer. 

Source: National Obesity Observatory 2012

Page 31: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

4. Future trends: magnifying the pressures

Page 32: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Demographics are changing.

Page 33: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

More people with long-term conditions.

Page 34: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

A rise in chronic disease.

Page 35: The case for change Time to Think Differently .
Page 36: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

Population lifestyles present significant risks to health.

Page 37: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

What is the future model of care?

Integrated care, co-ordinated around the needs of patients and service users.Patients and service users actively involved in the design of their care and working with professionals as part of the care team.Re-designing the care pathway, with greater specialisation in hospitals, increased capacity and more consistent standards in primary care.Stronger focus on prevention.

Page 38: The case for change Time to Think Differently .

If you would like to know more:

Visit www.kingsfund.org.uk/think for guest blogs, videos and supporting data on trends.

Follow us @thekingsfund or join the debate #kfthink

Like us on Facebook

Follow us on LinkedIn