BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adam, M. (2004). Why worry about theory-dependence? Circularity,minimal empiricality and reliability. International Studies in thePhilosophy of Science, 18, 117–132.

Adams, F., & Aizawa, K.(2001). The bounds of cognition. PhilosophicalPsychology, 14, 43–64.

Ahn, W., Kalish, C., Gelman, S. A., Medin, D. L., Luhmann, C., Atran,S., Coley, J. D., & Shafto, P. (2001). Why essences are essential inthe psychology of concepts. Cognition, 82, 59–69.

Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A.(1995). The roleof covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution.Cognition, 54, 299–352.

Aiello, L. C., & Wheeler, P.(1995). The expensive-tissue hypothesis. Thebrain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution.Current Anthropology, 36, 199–221.

Akins, K. (1996). Of sensory systems and the “aboutness” of mentalstates. Journal of Philosophy, 93, 337–372.

Alibali, M., & DiRusso, A. A.(1999). The function of gesture in learningto count: More than keeping track. Cognitive Development, 14,37–56.

Andres, M., Seron, X., & Olivier, E.(2007). Contribution of hand motorcircuits to counting. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 563–576.

Anggoro, F. K., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2005). The e↵ects

267

268 Bibliography

of naming practices on children’s understanding of living things.In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedingsof the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society(pp. 139–144). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Antell, S. E., & Keating, D. P.(1983). Perception of numerical invariancein neonates. Child Development, 54, 695–701.

Aristotle. (ca. 340 B.C.E.). Meteorologica. Retrieved May20, 2011, from http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/meteorology/book1.html.

Atran, S.(1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitiveuniversals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,21, 547–569.

Atran, S. (2001). The case for modularity: Sin or salvation? Evolutionand Cognition, 7, 1–10.

Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. (2004). Evolution and devolution ofknowledge: A tale of two biologies. Journal of the Royal Anthropo-logical Institute, 10, 395–420.

Aunger, R. (Ed.). (2000). Darwinizing culture: The status of memeticsas a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baillargeon, R.(2004). Infants’ reasoning about hidden objects: Evidencefor event-general and event-specific expectations. DevelopmentalScience, 7, 391–424.

Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E. S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object perma-nence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191–208.

Barabashev, A. G. (1997). In support of significant modernization oforiginal mathematical texts (in defense of presentism). PhilosophiaMathematica, 5, 21–41.

Barrett, H. C.(2004). Design versus descent in Shuar children’s reasoningabout animals. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 25–50.

Barrett, H. C.(2005). Enzymatic computation and cognitive modularity.Mind & Language, 20, 259–287.

Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R.(2006). Modularity in cognition: Framingthe debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628–647.

Barrett, J. L. (1998). Cognitive constraints on Hindu concepts of thedivine. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 608–619.

Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Lanham, MD:AltaMira Press.

Barrett, J. L., Burdett, E. R., & Porter, T. J.(2009). Counterintuitiveness

Bibliography 269

in folktales: Finding the cognitive optimum. Journal of Cognitionand Culture, 9, 271–287.

Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural en-tity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology,31, 219–247.

Barrett, J. L., & Nyhof, M. A. (2001). Spreading non-natural concepts:The role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and trans-mission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1,69–100.

Barth, H., La Mont, K., Lipton, J., Dehaene, S., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke,E. S.(2006). Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children.Cognition, 98, 199–222.

Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Bassi, M. (1988). On the Borana calendrical system: A preliminary fieldreport. Current Anthropology, 29, 619–624.

Benacerraf, P. (1973). Mathematical truth. Journal of Philosophy, 70,661–680.

Berger, A., Tzur, G., & Posner, M. I. (2006). Infant brains detect arith-metic errors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ofthe United States of America, 103, 12649–12653.

Berger, L. R., Churchill, S. E., De Klerk, B., & Quinn, R. L. (2008).Small-bodied humans from Palau, Micronesia. PLoS One, 3, e1780.

Bering, J. M.(2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and BrainSciences, 29, 453–462.

Bering, J. M. (2011). The God instinct. The psychology of souls, destinyand the meaning of life. London: Nicholas Brealy.

Bering, J. M., McLeod, K., & Shackelford, T. (2005). Reasoning aboutdead agents reveals possible adaptive trends. Human Nature, 16,360–381.

Biro, D., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001a). Chimpanzee numerical competence:Cardinal and ordinal skills. In T. Matsuzawa (Ed.), Primate originsof human cognition and behavior (pp. 199–225). Tokyo: Springer.

Biro, D., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001b). Use of numerical symbols by thechimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Cardinals, ordinals, and the intro-duction of zero. Animal Cognition, 4, 193–199.

Bisazza, A., Pi↵er, L., Serena, G., & Agrillo, C. (2010). Ontogeny ofnumerical abilities in fish. PLoS ONE, 5, e15516.

270 Bibliography

Blackburn, S. (2001). Normativity a la mode. Journal of Ethics, 5, 139–153.

Blaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J., & Waldmann, M. R. (2006).Causal reasoning in rats. Science, 311, 1020–1022.

Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes’ baby. How child development explains whatmakes us human. London: Arrow Books.

Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10, 147–151.

Bloom, P. (2009). Religious belief as an evolutionary accident. InJ. Schloss & M. Murray (Eds.), The believing primate. Scientific,philosophical, and theological reflections on the origin of religion(pp. 118–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S.(2007). Childhood origins of adult resistanceto science. Science, 316, 996–997.

Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (1992). The origins of psychological axioms ofarithmetic and geometry. Mind & Language, 7, 409–416.

Blyth, E. (1835). An attempt to classify the “varieties” of animals, withobservations on the marked seasonal and other changes which nat-urally take place in various British species, and which do not con-stitute varieties. Magazine of Natural History, 8, 40–53.

Boesch, C., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Chimpanzee and human cultures.Current Anthropology, 39, 591–614.

Bonatti, L., Frot, E., Zangl, R., & Mehler, J.(2002). The human first hy-pothesis: Identification of conspecifics and individuation of objectsin the young infant. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 388–426.

Boudry, M., Blancke, S., & Braeckman, J. (2010). How not to attackIntelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical misconceptions aboutmethodological naturalism. Foundations of Science, 15, 227–244.

Boulter, S. J. (2007). The “evolutionary argument” and the metaphilos-ophy of commonsense. Biology & Philosophy, 22, 369–382.

Bowler, P. J.(2003). Evolution. The history of an idea (3rd ed.). Berkeley& Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Bowler, P. J.(2008). What Darwin disturbed. Isis, 99, 560–567.Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1995). Why does culture increase human

adaptability? Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 125–143.Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J.(1996). Why culture is common, but cultural

evolution is rare. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 77–93.Boyer, C. B.(1944). Fundamental steps in the development of numeration.

Bibliography 271

Isis, 35, 153–168.Boyer, P. (1998). Cognitive tracks of cultural inheritance: How evolved

intuitive ontology governs cultural transmission. American Anthro-pologist, 100, 876–889.

Boyer, P. (2000). Natural epistemology or evolved metaphysics? Devel-opmental evidence for early-developed, intuitive, category-specific,incomplete, and stubborn metaphysical presumptions. Philosophi-cal Psychology, 13, 277–296.

Boyer, P.(2002). Religion explained. The evolutionary origins of religiousthought. London: Vintage.

Boyer, P., & Barrett, H. C.(2005). Domain specicity and intuitive ontol-ogy. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology(pp. 96–118). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious con-cepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive repre-sentations. Cognitive Science, 25, 535–564.

Brannon, E. M.(2002). The development of ordinal numerical knowledgein infancy. Cognition, 83, 223–240.

Brannon, E. M., & Terrace, H. S. (2002). The evolution and ontogeny ofordinal numerical ability. In M. Beko↵, C. Allen, & G. M. Burghardt(Eds.), The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectiveson animal cognition (pp. 197–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brauer, J., Kaminski, J., Riedel, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006).Making inferences about the location of hidden food: Social dog,causal ape. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 38–46.

Breuer, T., Ndoundou-Hockembal, M., & Fishlock, V. (2005). First ob-servation of tool use in wild gorillas. PLoS Biology, 3, e380.S.

Brewer, W., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2000). Explanationin scientists and children. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.),Explanation and cognition (pp. 279–298). Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

Brown, P., Sutikna, T., Morwood, M. J., Soejono, R. P., Jatmiko, Sap-tomo, E. W., & Due, R. A. (2004). A new small-bodied homininfrom the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature, 431, 1055–1061.

Brunet, M., F., G., Pilbeam, D., Mackaye, H. T., Likius, A., Ahounta, D.,Beauvilain, A., Blondel, C., Bocherens, H., Boisserie, J.-R., De Bo-nis, L., Coppens, Y., Dejax, J., Denys, C., Duringer, P., Eisenmann,

272 Bibliography

V., Fanone, G., Fronty, P., Geraads, D., Lehmann, T., Lihoreau, F.,Louchart, A., Mahamat, A., Merceron, G., Mouchelin, G., Otero,O., Campomanes, P. P., Ponce De Leon, M., Rage, J. C., Sapanet,M., Schuster, M., Sudre, J., Tassy, P., Valentin, X., Vignaud, P.,Viriot, L., Zazzo, A., & Zollikofer, C. (2002). A new hominid fromthe Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa. Nature, 418, 145–151.

Bu↵on, comte de, G.-L. L. (1766). Histoire naturelle generale et par-ticuliere. Avec la description du cabinet du roi (Vol. 14). Paris:Imprimerie royale.

Buridan, J.(14th c. [2009]). Impetus and its applications. In T. McGrew,M. Alspector-Kelly, & F. Allho↵ (Eds.), Philosophy of science. Anhistorical anthology (pp. 86–90). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Burkart, J., & Heschl, A. (2005, August). Do nonhuman primates un-derstand the mentalistic content of seeing? Paper presented at theAnnual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy.

Bushnell, I. W. R. (2001). Mother’s face recognition in newborn infants:Learning and memory. Infant and Child Development, 10, 67–74.

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: Anevolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review,100, 204–232.

Butterworth, B.(1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.Butterworth, B.(2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Jour-

nal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 3–18.Butterworth, B., Reeve, R., Reynolds, F., & Lloyd, D.(2008). Numerical

thought with and without words: Evidence from indigenous Aus-tralian children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesof the United States of America, 105, 13179–13184.

Buzaglo, M. (2002). The logic of concept expansion. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

Cacciari, C., Levorato, M. C., & Cicogna, P.(1997). Imagination at work:Conceptual and linguistic creativity in children. In T. B. Ward,S. S. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought. An investigationof conceptual structures and processes (pp. 145–177). WashingtonD.C.: American Psychological Association.

Cain, C. R. (2006). Implications of the marked artifacts of the MiddleStone Age of Africa. Current Anthropology, 47, 675–681.

Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1999). A non-verbal false belief task: Theperformance of children and great apes. Child Development, 70,

Bibliography 273

381–395.Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of

mind? 30 Years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 187–192.Callaghan, T., Rochat, P., Lillard, A., Claux, M. L., Odden, H., Itakura,

S., Tapanya, S., & Singh, S. (2005). Synchrony in the onset ofmental-state reasoning. Evidence from five cultures. PsychologicalScience, 16, 378–384.

Callebaut, W. (Ed.). (1993). Taking the naturalistic turn, or, how realphilosophy of science is done. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Cantlon, J. F., Brannon, E. M., Carter, E. J., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2006).Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-oldchildren. PLoS Biology, 4, e125.

Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Whatare the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical reviewof the clinical evidence. Neuropsychology, 20, 213–261.

Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptualknowledge: The evidence from category-specific deficits. Trends inCognitive Sciences, 7, 354–361.

Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge sys-tems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1–34.

Carey, S. (2004). Bootstrapping and the origin of concepts. Daedalus,133, 59–68.

Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S.(1996). Science and core knowledge. Philosophyof Science, 63, 515–533.

Carnap, R.(1945). On inductive logic. Philosophy of Science, 12, 288–309.Carreiras, M., Seghier, M. L., Baquero, S., Estevez, A., Lozano, A., De-

vlin, J. T., & Price, C. J. (2009). An anatomical signature forliteracy. Nature, 461, 983–986.

Carruthers, P. (2002). The roots of scientific reasoning: Infancy, modu-larity and the art of tracking. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Sie-gal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 73–95). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind. Oxford: ClarendonPress.

Carruthers, P., Stich, S., & Siegal, M. (Eds.). (2002). The cognitive basisof science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cela-Conde, C. J., & Ayala, F. J. (2003). Genera of the human lin-

274 Bibliography

eage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the UnitedStates of America, 100, 7684–7689.

Chambers, R.(1844). Vestiges of the natural history of creation. London:John Churchill.

Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientificprogress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chemla, K. (2003). Generality above abstraction: The general expressedin terms of the paradigmatic in mathematics in ancient China. Sci-ence in Context, 16, 413–458.

Chemla, K., & Guo, S. (2004). Les neuf chapitres. Le classiquemathematique de la Chine ancienne et ses commentaires. Paris:Dunod.

Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basicare behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey tradingbehavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517–537.

Chittka, L., & Niven, J. (2009). Are bigger brains better? CurrentBiology, 19, 995–1008.

Chochon, F., Cohen, L., van de Moortele, P. F., & Dehaene, S. (1999).Di↵erential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lob-ules to number processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11,617–630.

Chomsky, N.(1957). Syntactic structures. Den Haag & Paris: Mouton.Chomsky, N.(1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell.Chrisomalis, S.(2004). A cognitive typology for numerical notation. Cam-

bridge Archaeological Journal, 14, 37–52.Chrisomalis, S. (2010). Numerical notation: A comparative history. New

York: Cambridge University Press.Churchland, P. M.(1989). A neurocomputational perspective. The nature

of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Clark, A. (2006). Material symbols. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 291–

307.Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58,

7–19.Clendinnen, F. J.(1989). Evolutionary explanation and the justification of

belief. In K. Hahlweg & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Issues in evolutionaryepistemology (pp. 458–474). Albany, NY: State University of NewYork Press.

Code, L.(1996). What is natural about epistemology naturalized? Amer-

Bibliography 275

ican Philosophical Quarterly, 33, 1–22.Cohen, L. B., & Marks, K. S. (2002). How infants process addition and

subtraction events. Developmental Science, 5, 186–212.Cordes, S., Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (2001). Variability signatures

distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and smallnumbers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 698–707.

Corsi, P. (2005). Before Darwin: Transformist concepts in Europeannatural history. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 67–83.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994a). Beyond intuition and instinct blind-ness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science. Cogni-tion, 50, 41–77.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994b). Origins of domain specificity: Theevolution of functional organization. In L. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gel-man (Eds.), Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition andculture (pp. 85–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisti-cians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature onjudgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1–73.

Dacke, M., & Srinivasan, M. V.(2008). Evidence for counting in insects.Animal Cognition, 11, 683–689.

Dantzig, T. (1954). Number, the language of science (4th, revised andaugmented ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). Di↵erential enhancement of work-ing memory with mathematical versus verbal precocity. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 83, 48–56.

Dart, R. A. (1925). Australopithecus africanus: The man-ape of SouthAfrica. Nature, 115, 195–199.

Dartnall, T.(2005). Does the world leak into the mind? Active external-ism, ‘internalism’ and epistemology. Cognitive Science, 29, 135–143.

Darwin, C. (1838). Notebook d: Transmutation of species. Retrieved De-cember 15, 2009, from http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=CUL-DAR123.-&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.

Darwin, C.(1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selectionor the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London:John Murray.

Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.London: John Murray.

Darwin, C. (1881). Letter 13230, C. Darwin to W. Graham, July 1881.

276 Bibliography

Retrieved May 20, 2010, from http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-13230.

Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1983). The mathematical experience. London:Pelican.

Dawkins, R.(1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Dawkins, R.(2006). The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mi✏in.Dear, P.(2006). The intelligibility of nature. How science makes sense of

the world. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Decock, L. (2008). The conceptual basis of numerical abilities: One-

to-one correspondence versus the successor relation. PhilosophicalPsychology, 21, 459–473.

De Cruz, H. (2006). Why are some numerical concepts more successfulthan others? An evolutionary perspective on the history of numberconcepts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 306–323.

De Cruz, H. (2008). An extended mind perspective on natural numberrepresentation. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 475–490.

De Cruz, H. (2009a). An enhanced argument for innate elemen-tary geometric knowledge and its philosophical implications. InB. Van Kerkhove (Ed.), New perspectives on mathematical prac-tices. Essays in philosophy and history of mathematics (pp. 185–206). New Jersey: World Scientific.

De Cruz, H. (2009b). Is linguistic determinism an empirically testablehypothesis? Logique et Analyse, 208, 327–341.

De Cruz, H., Boudry, M., De Smedt, J., & Blancke, S. (in press). Evolu-tionary approaches to epistemic justification. Dialectica.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2007). The role of intuitive ontologies inscientific understanding—The case of human evolution. Biology &Philosophy, 22, 351–368.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2010a). The innateness hypothesis andmathematical concepts. Topoi, 29, 3–13.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2010b). Paley’s iPod: The cognitive basisof the design argument within natural theology. Zygon: Journal ofReligion and Science, 45, 665–684.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J.(2010c). Science as structured imagination.Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 29–44.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (in press a). Evolved cognitive biases andthe epistemic status of scientific beliefs. Philosophical Studies.

Bibliography 277

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (in press b). Mathematical symbols asepistemic actions. Synthese.

De Cruz, H., Neth, H., & Schlimm, D. (2010). The cognitive basis ofarithmetic. In B. Lowe & T. Muller (Eds.), PhiMSAMP. Philosophyof mathematics: Sociological aspects and mathematical practice (pp.59–106). London: College Publications.

Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.

Dehaene, S. (2003). The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A loga-rithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 145–147.

Dehaene, S. (2005). Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading andarithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In S. Dehaene,J. Duhamel, M. D. Hauser, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), From monkeybrain to human brain (pp. 133–157). Cambridge, MA & London:MIT Press.

Dehaene, S.(2009). Origins of mathematical intuitions. The case of arith-metic. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 232–259.

Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., & Pica, P. (2008). Log or linear?Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonianindigene cultures. Science, 320, 1217–1220.

Dehaene, S., Spelke, E. S., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999).Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imagingevidence. Science, 284, 970–974.

Delagnes, A., & Roche, H.(2005). Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills:The case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya. Journal of HumanEvolution, 48, 435–472.

DeLoache, J. S. (2004). Becoming symbol-minded. Trends in CognitiveSciences, 8, 66–70.

de Maillet, B.(1748). Telliamed ou entretiens d’un philosophe indien avecun missionnaire francois sur la diminution de la mer, la formationde la terre, l’origine de l’homme, & c. Amsterdam: Honore & Fils.

De Morgan, A. (1830). On the study and di�culties of mathematics.London: Paul Kegan.

Dennett, D. C.(1991). Consciousness explained. London: Penguin.Dennett, D. C.(1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. Evolution and the mean-

ings of life. London: Allen Lane.Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell. Religion as a natural phe-

278 Bibliography

nomenon. Oxford: Allen Lane.De Regt, H. W., & Dieks, D. (2005). A contextual approach to scientific

understanding. Synthese, 144, 137–170.d’Errico, F. (1995). A new model and its implications for the origin of

writing: The La Marche antler revisited. Cambridge ArchaeologicalJournal, 5, 163–206.

d’Errico, F. (1998). Palaeolithic origins of artificial memory systems:An evolutionary perspective. In C. Renfrew & C. Scarre (Eds.),Cognition and material culture: The archaeology of symbolic storage(pp. 19–50). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for ArchaeologicalResearch.

Descartes, R.(1637 [1988]). Le discours de la methode, la dioptrique, lesmeteores et la geometrie. In F. Alquie (Ed.), Œuvres philosophiquesde Descartes (pp. 549–761). Paris: Classiques Garnier.

De Smedt, J.(2011). Common minds, uncommon thoughts. A philosoph-ical anthropological investigation of uniquely human creative behav-ior, with an emphasis on artistic ability, religious reflection, andscientific study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ghent University.

De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2010). Toward an integrative approach ofcognitive neuroscientific and evolutionary psychological studies ofart. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 695–719.

De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2011a). The cognitive appeal of the cos-mological argument. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion,23, 103-122.

De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2011b). The role of material culture inhuman time representation: Calendrical systems as extensions ofmental time travel. Adaptive Behavior, 19, 63–76.

De Smedt, J., De Cruz, H., & Braeckman, J. (2009). Why the humanbrain is not an enlarged chimpanzee brain. In H. Høgh-Olesen,J. Tønnesvang, & P. Bertelsen (Eds.), Human characteristics. Evo-lutionary perspectives on human mind and kind (pp. 168–181). New-castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

Devitt, M. (1996). Coming to our senses. A naturalistic program forsemantic localism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

de Waal, F. B. M. (1999). Cultural primatology comes of age. Nature,399, 635–636.

d’Halloy, J.-J. d’Omalius.(1846). Note sur la succession des etres vivants.Bulletins de l’academie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-

Bibliography 279

arts de Belgique, 13, 581–591.Diamond, J. (1992). The rise and fall of the third chimpanzee. How our

animal heritage a↵ects the way we live. London: Vintage.Diamond, J., & Bishop, K. D.(1999). Ethno-ornithology of the Ketengban

people, Indonesian New Guinea. In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.),Folkbiology (pp. 17–45). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.

diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall(Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.

Dobzhansky, T. (1944). On species and races of living and fossil man.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2, 251–265.

Donald, M.(1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evo-lution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityPress.

Douven, I., & van Brakel, J. (1995). Is scientific realism an empiricalhypothesis? Dialectica, 49, 3–14.

Downes, S. M. (1993). Naturalized philosophy of science. Philosophy ofScience, 60, 452–468.

Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and con-ceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. S. Smith, & J. Vaid(Eds.), Creative thought. An investigation of conceptual structuresand processes (pp. 461–493). Washington D.C.: American Psycho-logical Association.

Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach tocognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5,334–339.

Dunbar, K., & Fugelsang, J.(2005). Scientific thinking and reasoning. InK. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbookof thinking and reasoning (pp. 705–725). New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Dunbar, R. I. M., & Barrett, L. (Eds.). (2007). Oxford handbook ofevolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dupre, J. (1999). Are whales fish? In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.),Folkbiology (pp. 461–476). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.

Eddington, A. (1928). The nature of the physical world. RetrievedApril 3, 2011, from http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse.asp?PubID=TPNOPW&Volume=0&Issue=0&ArticleID=2.

Eger, E., Sterzer, P., Russ, M. O., Giraud, A.-L., & Kleinschmidt, A.

280 Bibliography

(2003). A supramodal number representation in human intrapari-etal cortex. Neuron, 37, 1–20.

Ekert, A. (2008). Complex and unpredictable Cardano. InternationalJournal of Theoretical Physics, 47, 2101–2119.

Elga, A.(2007). Reflection and disagreement. Nous, 41, 478–502.Elqayam, S., & Evans, J. B.(in press). Subtracting ‘ought’ from ‘is’: De-

scriptivism versus normativism in the study of the human thinking.Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Ericsson, K., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Romer, C.(1993). The role of deliber-ate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychologicalreview, 100, 363–406.

Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics.Albany: State University of New York Press.

Evans, E. M. (2000). Beyond Scopes. Why creationism is here to stay.In K. Rosengren, C. Johnson, & P. Harris (Eds.), Imaging the im-possible: Magical, scientific and religious thinking in children (pp.305–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Everett, D. L. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition inPiraha. Current Anthropology, 46, 621–634.

Fabre-Thorpe, M., Richard, G., & Thorpe, S. J. (1998). Rapid cate-gorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys. NeuroReport, 9,303–308.

Fales, E. (1996). Plantinga’s case against naturalistic epistemology. Phi-losophy of Science, 63, 432–451.

Farah, M. J., & Rabinowitz, C. (2003). Genetic and environmental in-fluences on the organization of semantic memory in the brain: Is“living things” an innate category? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20,401–408.

Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Eye con-tact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 9602–9605.

Farroni, T., Johnson, M. H., Menon, E., Zulian, L., Faraguna, D., &Csibra, G. (2005). Newborns’ preference for face-relevant stimuli:E↵ects of contrast polarity. Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 17245–17250.

Fehr, E., & Gachter, S.(2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature,415, 137–140.

Bibliography 281

Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. D. (2002). The representationsunderlying infants’ choice of more: Object files versus analog mag-nitudes. Psychological Science, 13, 150–156.

Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Core systems ofnumber. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314.

Feist, G. J. (2006). The psychology of science and the origins of thescientific mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Feldman, R. (2007). Reasonable religious disagreements. In L. Anthony(Ed.), Philosophers without gods (pp. 194–214). Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Feron, J., Gentaz, E., & Streri, A.(2006). Evidence of amodal representa-tion of small numbers across visuo-tactile modalities in 5-month-oldinfants. Cognitive Development, 21, 81–92.

Fischer, M. H. (2003). Cognitive representation of negative numbers.Psychological Science, 14, 278–282.

Flombaum, J. I., Junge, J. A., & Hauser, M. D.(2005). Rhesus monkeys(Macaca mulatta) spontaneously compute addition operations overlarge numbers. Cognition, 97, 315–325.

Flombaum, J. I., & Santos, L. R. (2005). Rhesus monkeys attributeperceptions to others. Current Biology, 15, 447–452.

Focquaert, F., Braeckman, J., & Platek, S. M. (2008). An evolution-ary cognitive neuroscience perspective on human self-awareness andtheory of mind. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 47–68.

Fodor, J. A.(1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.Fodor, J. A. (1981). Representations: Philosophical essays on the foun-

dations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Fodor, J. A.(1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Fodor, J. A. (2000). The mind doesn’t work that way. Cambridge, MA:

MIT Press.Foley, R.(1987). Another unique species: Patterns in human evolutionary

ecology. Harlow: Longman.Foley, R.(2001). In the shadow of the modern synthesis? Alternative per-

spectives on the last fifty years of paleoanthropology. EvolutionaryAnthropology, 10, 5–14.

Forrest, B.(2000). Methodological naturalism and philosophical natural-ism: Clarifying the connection. Philo, 3, 7–29.

Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Num-ber as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Piraha language and

282 Bibliography

cognition. Cognition, 108, 819–824.Frank, M. C., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E.(2008). Language as a cognitive

technology: English-speakers match like Piraha when you don’t letthem count. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.),Proceedings of the XXX annual conference of the Cognitive ScienceSociety (pp. 439–444). Austin, Texas: Cognitive Science Society.

Frankenhuis, W. E., & Ploeger, A.(2007). Evolutionary psychology versusFodor: Arguments for and against the massive modularity hypoth-esis. Philosophical Psychology, 20, 687–710.

Fricker, E. (2002). Trusting others in the sciences: A priori or empiricalwarrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 373–383.

Friedman, M. (1997). Philosophical naturalism. Proceedings and Ad-dresses of the American Philosophical Association, 71, 7–21.

Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999). Interacting minds—A biological basis.Science, 286, 1692–1695.

Gabunia, L., Vekua, A., Lordkipanidze, D., Swisher III, C. C., Ferring, R.,Justus, A., Nioradze, M., Tvalchrelidze, M., Anton, S. C., Bosinski,G., Joris, O., de Lumley, M.-A., Majsuradze, G., & Moukhelishvili,A.(2000). Earliest Pleistocene hominid cranial remains of Georgia:Taxonomy, geological setting, and age. Science, 288, 1019–1025.

Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.

Gallistel, C. R.(1995). The replacement of general-purpose theories withadaptive specializations. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neu-rosciences (pp. 1255–1267). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition:From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 59–65.

Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G.(2003). Brain structures di↵er between musiciansand non-musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9240–9245.

Geary, D. C.(1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cog-nition. Implications for mathematical development and instruction.American Psychologist, 50, 24–37.

Geary, D. C. (2002). Principles of evolutionary educational psychology.Learning and Individual Di↵erences, 12, 317–345.

Geary, D. C. (2007a). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual founda-tions for an evolutionary educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson& J. R. Levin (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind. Psychological

Bibliography 283

perspectives on contemporary educational issues (Vol. 2, pp. 1–99).Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

Geary, D. C. (2007b). An evolutionary perspective on learning disabilityin mathematics. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32, 471–519.

Geary, D. C., Bow-Thomas, C. C., Liu, F., & Siegler, R. S. (1996). De-velopment of arithmetical competencies in Chinese and Americanchildren: Influence of age, language, and schooling. Child Develop-ment, 67, 2022–2044.

Geist, C., Lowe, B., & Van Kerkhove, B.(2010). Peer review and knowl-edge by testimony in mathematics. In B. Lowe & T. Muller (Eds.),PhiMSAMP. Philosophy of mathematics: Sociological aspects andmathematical practice (pp. 155–178). London: College Publica-tions.

Gelman, S. A. (2004). Psychological essentialism in children. Trends inCognitive Sciences, 8, 404–409.

Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J.(1990). The importance of knowing a dodo isa bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Develop-mental Psychology, 26, 796–804.

Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Earlyunderstandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38, 213–244.

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework foranalogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.

Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R. W., Markman, A. B., Levidow,B. B., Wol↵, P., & Forbus, K. D. (1997). Analogical reasoning andconceptual change: A case-study of Johannes Kepler. Journal ofthe Learning Sciences, 6, 3–40.

Gentner, T. Q., Fenn, K. M., Margoliash, D., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2006).Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature, 440,1204–1207.

Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Kiraly, I. (2002). Rational imitation inpreverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.

Gerstmann, J. (1940). Syndrome of finger agnosia: Disorientation forright and left, agraphia and acalculia. Archives of Neurology andPsychiatry, 44, 398–408.

Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23,121–123.

Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogicaltransfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.

284 Bibliography

Giere, R. N. (2004). The problem of agency in scientific distributed cog-nitive systems. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 759–774.

Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G.(1996). Reasoning the fast and frugalway: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103,650–669.

Gigerenzer, G., & Ho↵rage, U.(1999). Overcoming di�culties in Bayesianreasoning: A reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers andMcGraw (1999). Psychological Review, 2, 425–430.

Gilad, Y., Wiebe, V., Przeworski, M., Lancet, D., & Paabo, S. (2004).Loss of olfactory receptor genes coincides with the acquisition of fulltrichromatic vision in primates. PLoS Biology, 2, 120–125.

Gilmore, C. K., McCarthy, S. E., & Spelke, E. S.(2007). Symbolic arith-metic knowledge without instruction. Nature, 447, 589–591.

Gil-White, F. J.(2001). Are ethnic groups biological “species” to the hu-man brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories.Current Anthropology, 42, 515–536.

Glass, B. (1979). Milestones and rates of growth in the development ofbiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 54, 31–53.

Godfrey-Smith, P.(1991). Signal, decision, action. Journal of Philosophy,88, 709–722.

Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturinggives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20,267–272.

Goldin-Meadow, S., & Wagner, S. M. (2005). How our hands help uslearn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 234–241.

Goldman, A. I. (1990). Natural selection, justification, and inference tothe best explanation. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Evolution, cognition andrealism. Studies in evolutionary epistemology (pp. 39–46). Lanham:University Press of America.

Goldman, A. I. (1999). A priori warrant and naturalistic epistemology.In J. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 13, Epistemology(pp. 1–28). Oxford: Blackwell.

Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds. The philosophy, psychology,and neuroscience of mindreading. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.

Goodman, N. D. (1981). The experiential foundations of mathematicalknowledge. History and Philosophy of Logic, 2, 55–65.

Gopnik, A. (1996). The scientist as child. Philosophy of Science, 63,

Bibliography 285

485–514.Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., &

Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causalmaps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111, 3–32.

Gopnik, A., & Meltzo↵, A. (1997). Words, thoughts and theories. Cam-bridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gopnik, A., & Schulz, L.(2004). Mechanisms of theory formation in youngchildren. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 371–377.

Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence fromAmazonia. Science, 306, 496–499.

Gottfried, G., Gelman, S. A., & Schultz, J. (1999). Children’s under-standing of the brain: From early essentialism to biological theory.Cognitive Development, 14, 147–174.

Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge,MA & London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Grabiner, J. V.(1986). Is mathematical truth time-dependent? In T. Ty-moczko (Ed.), New directions in the philosophy of mathematics (pp.201–213). Boston: Birkhauser.

Greenblatt, S. H. (1995). Phrenology in the science and culture of the19th century. Neurosurgery, 37, 790–805.

Greer, B.(2004). The growth of mathematics through conceptual restruc-turing. Learning and Instruction, 14, 541–548.

Gregory, A. (2001). Harvey, Aristotle and the weather cycle. Studiesin History and Philosophy of Biology & Biomedical Sciences, 32,153–168.

Grei↵enhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. (2006). Mathematical relativism:Logic, grammar and arithmetic in cultural comparison. Journalfor the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36, 97–117.

Grei↵enhagen, C., & Sherman, W.(2008). Kuhn and conceptual change:On the analogy between conceptual changes in science and children.Science & Education, 17, 1–26.

Gu, J., & Gu, X. (2003). Induced gene expression in human brain afterthe split from chimpanzee. Trends in Genetics, 19, 63–65.

Guthrie, S. E.(1993). Faces in the clouds. A new theory of religion. NewYork & Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gutting, G. (2009). What philosophers know: Case studies in recentanalytic philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haile-Selassie, Y., Suwa, G., & White, T. D. (2004). Late Miocene teeth

286 Bibliography

from Middle Awash, Ethiopia, and early hominid dental evolution.Science, 303, 1503–1505.

Haith, M. M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is richinterpretation too costly? Infant Behavior and Development, 21,167–179.

Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual dif-ferences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achieve-ment. Nature, 455, 665–668.

Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). Do chimpanzees know whatconspecifics know? Animal Behaviour, 61, 139–151.

Harper, E.(1987). Ghosts of Diophantus. Educational Studies in Mathe-matics, 18, 75–90.

Harris, J. (1982). Facts and fallacies of Aboriginal number systems. InS. Hargrave (Ed.), Language and culture (pp. 153–181). Darwin:Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Harris, P. L. (2002). Checking our sources: The origins of trust in testi-mony. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 315–333.

Harris, P. L., Pasquini, E. S., Duke, S., Asscher, J. J., & Pons, F.(2006).Germs and angels: The role of testimony in young children’s ontol-ogy. Developmental Science, 9, 76–96.

Hart, R. (2010). The Chinese roots of linear algebra. Baltimore: JohnsHopkins University Press.

Harvey, W. (1628 [1847]). An anatomical disquisition on the motion ofthe heart and blood in animals. In R. Willis (Trans.), The works ofWillam Harvey, M.D. Physician to the king, professor of anatomyand surgery to the college of physicians. Translated from the Latinwith a life of the author (pp. 1–86). London: Sydenham Society.

Hassin, R. R., Bargh, J. A., & Uleman, J. S. (2002). Spontaneous causalinferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 515–522.

Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W.(2002). The faculty of language:What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.

Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L.(2010). The grand design. London: Bantam.Hebb, D. O.(1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.Held, R., Ostrovsky, Y., de Gelder, B., Gandhi, T., Ganesh, S., Mathur,

U., & Sinha, P. (2011). The newly sighted fail to match seen withfelt. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 551–553.

Henrich, J. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive

Bibliography 287

cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses—The Tasmaniancase. American Antiquity, 69, 197–211.

Henrich, J., & Boyd, R.(2002). On modeling cognition and culture. Whycultural evolution does not require replication of representations.Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 87–112.

Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McEl-reath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Smith Henrich, N.,Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q.,& Tracer, D.(2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective:Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral andBrain Sciences, 28, 795–815.

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest peoplein the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 61–83.

Herbert, S. (2005). The Darwinian revolution revisited. Journal of theHistory of Biology, 38, 51–66.

Hespos, S. J. (2007). Language acquisition: When does the learningbegin? Current Biology, 17, 628–630.

Hoddeson, L.(2007). Analogy and cognitive style in the history of inven-tion: Inventor independence and closeness of compared domains. InS. Vosniadou, D. Kayser, & A. Protopapas (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe European cognitive science conference (pp. 413–417). Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum.

Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imita-tion/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and chil-dren (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8, 164–181.

Hull, D. L.(1964). The e↵ect of essentialism on taxonomy—Two thousandyears of stasis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15,314–326.

Hume, D. (1739 [2001]). A treatise of human nature (D. F. Norton &M. J. Norton, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hume, D.(1779). Dialogues concerning natural religion. London: Hafner.Hunt, G. R., & Gray, R. D.(2003). Diversification and cumulative evolu-

tion in New Caledonian crow tool manufacture. Proceedings of theRoyal Society of London B, 270, 867–874.

Hurley, S. (2003). Animal action in the space of reasons. Mind & Lan-guage, 18, 231–257.

Hutchins, E.(1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Hutto, D. D.(2011). Presumptuous naturalism: A cautionary tale. Amer-

288 Bibliography

ican Philosophical Quarterly, 48, 129–145.Huxley, T. H. (1863). Evidences as to man’s place in nature. London:

Williams and Norgate.Ifrah, G.(1985). Les chi↵res, ou l’histoire d’une grande invention. Paris:

La↵ont.Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G.(2004). Vitalistic causality in young children’s

naive biology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 356–362.Ingman, M., Kaessmann, H., Paabo, S., & Gyllensten, U. (2000). Mi-

tochondrial genome variation and the origin of modern humans.Nature, 408, 708–713.

Irving, E.(2005). The role of latitude in mobilism debates. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102, 1821–1828.

Itakura, S.(2004). Gaze-following and joint visual attention in nonhumananimals. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 216–226.

Izard, V., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Dehaene, S.(2008). Distinct cerebralpathways for object identity and number in human infants. PLoSBiology, 6, e11.

Izard, V., Pica, P., Spelke, E. S., & Dehaene, S.(2011). Flexible intuitionsof Euclidean geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Proceed-ings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica, 108, 9782–9787.

Jackson, D. E., Holcombe, M., & Ratnieks, F. L. W.(2004). Trail geom-etry gives polarity to ant foraging networks. Nature, 432, 907–909.

Jacob, F.(1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science, 196, 1161–1166.Jacobs, R. A., Jordan, M. I., & Barto, A. G.(1991). Task decomposition

through competition in a modular connectionist architecture: Thewhat and where vision tasks. Cognitive Science, 15, 219–250.

Janik, V. M., Sayigh, L. S., & Wells, R. S.(2006). Signature whistle shapeconveys identity information to bottlenose dolphins. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,103, 8293–8297.

Jansson, D. G., Condoor, S. S., & Brock, H. R. (1993). Cognition indesign: Viewing the hidden side of the design process. Environmentand Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 257–271.

Jordan, K. E., & Brannon, E. M. (2006). The multisensory representa-tion of number in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 103, 3486–3489.

Bibliography 289

Jordan, K. E., Brannon, E. M., Logothetis, N. K., & Ghazanfar, A. A.(2005). Monkeys match the number of voices they hear to the num-ber of faces they see. Current Biology, 15, 1–5.

Joseph, G. G. (2000). The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots ofmathematics (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kahane, G. (2011). Evolutionary debunking arguments. Nous, 45, 103–125.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncer-tainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.(1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions.Psychological Review, 103, 582–591.

Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M.(2008). Chimpanzees know whatothers know, but not what they believe. Cognition, 109, 224–234.

Kant, I.(1781 [2005]). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood,Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M.(1997). The fusiform facearea: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for faceperception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.

Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. SmallBusiness Reports, 18, 68–71.

Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the religious inherit the Earth? Demographyand politics in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books.

Keil, F. C.(1989). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

Keil, F. C.(2003). Folkscience: Coarse interpretations of a complex real-ity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 368–373.

Kelemen, D.(2003). British and American children’s preferences for teleo-functional explanations of the natural world. Cognition, 88, 201–221.

Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning aboutpurpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295–301.

Kelemen, D., Callanan, M. A., Casler, K., & Perez-Granados, D. R.(2005). Why things happen: Teleological explanation in parent-child conversations. Developmental Psychology, 41, 251–264.

Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction:Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111, 138–143.

Kelemen, D., Widdowson, D., Posner, T., Brown, A., & Casler, K.(2003).

290 Bibliography

Teleo-functional constraints on preschool children’s reasoning aboutliving things. Developmental Science, 6, 329–345.

Kertesz, A. (2004). Cognitive semantics and scientific knowledge: Casestudies in the cognitive science of science. Amsterdam: John Ben-jamins.

Khan, I. A., Daya, S. K., & Gowda, R. M.(2005). Evolution of the theoryof circulation. International Journal of Cardiology, 98, 519–521.

Kilian, A., Yaman, S., von Fersen, L., & Gunturkun, O. (2003). A bot-tlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli di↵ering in numerosity.Learning and Behavior, 31, 133–142.

Kim, J.(1988). What is “naturalized epistemology?”. Philosophical Per-spectives, 2, 381–405.

King, M.-C., & Wilson, A. C. (1975). Evolution at two levels in humansand chimpanzees. Science, 188, 107–116.

Kirsh, D. (1995). Complementary strategies: Why we use our handswhen we think. In J. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe XVII annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.212–217). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kirsh, D. (1996). Adapting the environment instead of oneself. AdaptiveBehavior, 4, 415–452.

Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from prag-matic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.

Kitcher, P.(1990). The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy,87, 5–22.

Kitcher, P. (1992). The naturalists return. Philosophical Review, 101,53–114.

Kitcher, P.(2008). Science, religion, and democracy. Episteme: A Journalof Social Epistemology, 5, 5–18.

Kobayashi, T., Hiraki, K., Mugitani, R., & Hasegawa, T. (2004). Babyarithmetic: One object plus one tone. Cognition, 91, B23–B34.

Koechlin, E., Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J.(1998). Numerical transformationsin five-month-old human infants. Mathematical Cognition, 3, 89–104.

Kornblith, H.(1994). Naturalism: Both metaphysical and epistemological.In P. French, T. E. Uehling, & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Midweststudies in philosophy, volume XIX, Philosophical naturalism (pp.39–52). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Koten Jr., J. W., Wood, G., Hagoort, P., Goebel, R., Propping, P.,

Bibliography 291

Willmes, K., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). Genetic contribution tovariation in cognitive function: An fMRI study in twins. Science,323, 1737–1740.

Kovacs, A. M., Teglas, E., & Endress, A. D.(2010). The social sense: Sus-ceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science,330, 1830–1834.

Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M.(2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuris-tics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge aboutmotion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 439–453.

Krieger, M. H.(1991). Theorems as meaningful cultural artifacts: Makingthe world additive. Synthese, 144, 135–154.

Kuhlmeier, V., Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (2004). Do 5-month-old infantssee humans as material objects? Cognition, 94, 95–103.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago:Chicago University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Tradition and innovationin scientific research. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension:Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. 225–239).Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kummer, H. (1995). Causal knowledge in animals. In D. Sperber,D. Premack, & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. A multidisci-plinary debate (pp. 26–36). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ladyman, J.(2007). Does physics answer metaphysical questions? RoyalInstitute of Philosophy Supplement, 61, 179–202.

Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes.Philosophical papers (J. Worrall & G. Currie, Eds.). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Lako↵, G., & Nunez, R. E.(2000). Where mathematics comes from. Howthe embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: BasicBooks.

Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R.(2006). Niche construction, human behav-ior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology,15, 95–104.

Lamarck, J.-B. (1809). Philosophie zoologique, ou exposition des con-siderations relatives a l’histoire naturelle des animaux. RetrievedAugust 20, 2009, from http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ice/ice book detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lamarck&table=ouvrages lamarck&bookId=29&typeofbookId=1&num=0.

292 Bibliography

Laudan, L. (1981). A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy ofScience, 48, 19–49.

Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., & Boh, L.(2006). Groups per-form better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers prob-lems: E↵ects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 90, 644–651.

Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2005). Number and natural language. InP. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind.Structure and contents (pp. 216–235). Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2007). Linguistic determinism and theinnate basis of number. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich(Eds.), The innate mind. Foundations and the future (pp. 139–170).Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leakey, M. G., Spoor, F., Brown, F. H., Gathogo, P. N., Kiarie, C.,Leakey, L. N., & McDougall, I. (2001). New hominin genus fromeastern Africa shows diverse Middle Pliocene lineages. Nature, 410,433–440.

Leakey, R. E. F., & Walker, A. C.(1976). Australopithecus , Homo erectus,and the single species hypothesis. Nature, 261, 572–574.

Le Clec’H, G., Dehaene, S., Cohen, C., Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., Poline,J. B., Lehricy, S., van de Moortele, P. F., & Le Bihan, D. (2000).Distinct cortical areas for names of numbers and body parts inde-pendent of language and input modality. NeuroImage, 12, 381–391.

Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more:An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal countingprinciples. Cognition, 105, 395–438.

Leibniz, G. W. (1765 [2001]). New essays on human understanding(P. Remnant & J. F. Bennett, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

Lemer, C., Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., & Cohen, L. (2003). Approximatequantities and exact number words: Dissociable systems. Neuropsy-chologia, 41, 1942–1958.

Leslie, A. M.(1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “Theoryof Mind”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.

Leslie, A. M., Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. (2008). The generative basisof natural number concepts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 213–218.

Bibliography 293

Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2003). Does morality have abiological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moralsentiments relating to incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society ofLondon B, 270, 819–826.

Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). Origins of number sense: Large-number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14,396–401.

Lipton, P.(1991). Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.Lipton, P. (2004). What good is an explanation? In J. Cornwell (Ed.),

Explanations. Styles of explanation in science (pp. 1–21). Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Liu, X., & MacIsaac, D. (2005). An investigation of factors a↵ectingthe degree of naıve impetus theory application. Journal of ScienceEducation and Technology, 14, 101–116.

Lloyd, G. E. R.(2007). Cognitive variations: Reflections on the unity anddiversity of the human mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Lockard, R. B.(1971). Reflections on the fall of comparative psychology:Is there a message for us all? American Psychologist, 26, 168–179.

Locke, J. (1689). An essay concerning human understanding. RetrievedSeptember 20, 2007, from http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/l/locke/john/l81u/index.html.

Loftus, E. (2003). Make-believe memories. American Psychologist, 58,867–873.

Lombard, M., & Phillipson, L. (2010). Indications of bow and stone-tipped arrow use 64000 years ago in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.Antiquity, 84, 635–648.

Lombrozo, T. (2007). Simplicity and probability in causal explanation.Cognitive Psychology, 55, 232–257.

Lombrozo, T., Kelemen, D., & Zaitchik, D. (2007). Inferring design:Evidence of a preference for teleological explanations in patientswith Alzheimer’s disease. Psychological Science, 18, 999–1006.

Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M.(2008). The importance ofunderstanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolu-tion: Education and Outreach, 1, 290–298.

Lutz, D. J., & Keil, F. C. (2002). Early understanding of the division ofcognitive labor. Child Development, 73, 1073–1084.

Machery, E.(2006). Two dogmas of neo-empiricism. Philosophy Compass,1, 398–412.

294 Bibliography

Maddy, P.(1997). Naturalism in mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Mahon, B. Z., Anzellotti, S., Schwarzbach, J., Zampini, M., & Caramazza,

A. (2009). Category-specific organization in the human brain doesnot require visual experience. Neuron, 63, 397–405.

Malthus, T. R.(1826). An essay on the principle of population or a viewof its past and present e↵ects on human happiness; with an inquiryinto our prospects respecting the future removal or mitigation of theevils which it occasions (6th ed.). London: John Murray.

Mameli, M., & Bateson, P. (2006). Innateness and the sciences. Biology& Philosophy, 21, 155–188.

Marcus, G. F.(2004). The birth of the mind. How a tiny number of genescreates the complexities of human thought. New York: Basic Books.

Margolis, E., & Laurence, S.(2007). The ontology of concepts—Abstractobjects or mental representations? Nous, 41, 561–593.

Marks, J. (2003). What it means to be 98% chimpanzee. Apes, people,and their genes. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of CaliforniaPress.

Marr, D. C.(1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the humanrepresentational system and processing of visual information. SanFrancisco: Freeman.

Marshall-Pescini, S., & Whiten, A.(2008). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)and the question of cumulative culture: An experimental approach.Animal Cognition, 11, 449–456.

Martin, A., & Weisberg, J. (2003). Neural foundations for understand-ing social and mechanical concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20,575–587.

Martın-Loeches, M., Casado, P., Gonzalo, R., de Heras, L., & Fernandez-Frıas, C.(2006). Brain potentials to mathematical syntax problems.Psychophysiology, 43, 579–591.

Martzlo↵, J. C.(1995). Review of Lam Lay Yong and Ang Tian Se (1992)Fleeting footsteps: Tracing the conception of arithmetic and algebrain ancient China. Historia Mathematica, 22, 67–87.

Masataka, N., Ohnishi, T., Imabayashi, E., Hirakata, M., & Matsuda,H. (2007). Neural correlates for learning to read roman numerals.Brain and Language, 100, 276–282.

Massey, C. M., & Gelman, R. (1988). Preschooler’s ability to decidewhether a photographed unfamiliar object can move itself. Devel-opmental psychology, 24, 307–317.

Bibliography 295

Matsuzawa, T.(2007). Comparative cognitive development. Developmen-tal Science, 10, 97–103.

Matthew, P. (1831). On naval timber and arboriculture; with criticalnotes on authors who have recently treated the subject of planting.Edinburgh: Adam Black.

Mattusch, C. C.(2003). Corinthian bronze: Famous, but elusive. Corinth,20, 219–232.

Mayr, E. (1950). Taxonomic categories in fossil hominids. Cold SpringHarbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 15, 109–117.

Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

Mayr, E.(1987). The ontological status of species: Scientific progress andphilosophical terminology. Biology & Philosophy, 2, 145–166.

McCauley, R. N.(2000). The naturalness of religion and the unnaturalnessof science. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation andcognition (pp. 61–85). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

McCauley, R. N. (in press). Why religion is natural and science is not.New York: Oxford University Press.

McCauley, R. N., & Henrich, J.(2006). Susceptibility to the Muller-Lyerillusion, theory-neutral observation, and the diachronic penetrabil-ity of the visual input system. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 79–101.

McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 249, 122–130.

McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Green, B. (1980). Curvilinear motionin the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion ofobjects. Science, 210, 1139–1141.

McCloskey, M., Washburn, A., & Felch, L. (1983). Intuitive physics:The straight-down belief and its origin. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 636–649.

McComb, K., Packer, C., & Pusey, A. E. (1994). Roaring and numericalassessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo.Animal Behaviour, 47, 379–387.

McCrink, K., & Wynn, K.(2004). Large-number addition and subtractionby 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 15, 776–781.

McDowell, J.(1996). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer-sity Press.

McKay, R. T., & Dennett, D. C. (2009). The evolution of misbelief.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 493–510.

296 Bibliography

McRoberts, R. W. (1990). Counting at Pularumpi: A survey of a tradi-tional mathematics and its implications for modern learning. Abo-riginal Child at School, 18, 19–43.

Meck, W. H., & Church, R. M.(1983). A mode control model of countingand timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: AnimalBehavior Processes, 9, 320–334.

Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (Eds.). (1999). Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.

Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A.(1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vos-niadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp.179–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meltzo↵, A. N. (1988). Infant imitation after a 1-week delay: Long-term memory for novel acts and multiple stimuli. DevelopmentalPsychology, 24, 470–476.

Meltzo↵, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manualgestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.

Menary, R. (2006). Attacking the bounds of cognition. PhilosophicalPsychology, 19, 329–344.

Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Attacking the bounds of cogni-tion. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Mercader, J., Barton, H., Gillespie, J., Harris, J., Kuhn, S., Tyler, R., &Boesch, C. (2007). 4,300-Year-old chimpanzee sites and the originsof percussive stone technology. Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 3043–3048.

Mercier, H. (2010). The social origins of folk epistemology. Review ofPhilosophy and Psychology, 1, 499–514.

Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Argumentsfor an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34,57–74.

Mikkelsen, T. S., Hillier, L. W., Eichler, E. E., Zody, M. C., Ja↵e, D. B.,Yang, S., Enard, W., Hellmann, I., Lindblad-Toh, K., Altheide,T. K., Archidiacono, N., Bork, P., Butler, J., Chang, J. L., Cheng,Z., Chinwalla, A. T., & deJong, P. (2005). Initial sequence of thechimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Na-ture, 473, 69–87.

Miller, G.(2000). The mating mind. How sexual choice shaped the evolu-tion of human nature. London: William Heineman.

Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of

Bibliography 297

evolution. Science, 313, 765–766.Miller, R., Owens, S. J., & Rørslett, B.(2011). Plants and colour: Flowers

and pollination. Optics and Laser Technology, 43, 282–294.Millikan, R. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories.

Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Millikan, R.(1998). A common structure for concepts of individuals, stu↵s

and real kinds: More mama, more milk and more mouse. Behavioraland Brain Sciences, 21, 55–65.

Millman, A. B., & Smith, C. L. (1997). Darwin’s use of analogical rea-soning in theory construction. Metaphor and Symbol, 12, 159–187.

Mills, C. M., & Keil, F. C.(2005). The development of cynicism. Psycho-logical Science, 16, 385–390.

Mithen, S. (1988). Looking and learning: Upper Palaeolithic art andinformation gathering. World Archaeology, 19, 297–327.

Mithen, S.(1996). The prehistory of the mind: A search for the origins ofart, religion and science. Boston & New York: Houghton Mi✏in.

Mithen, S. (2000). Mind, brain and material culture: An archaeologicalperspective. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolutionand the human mind. Modularity, language and meta-cognition (pp.207–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Molko, N., Cachia, A., Riviere, D., Mangin, J.-F., Bruandet, M., Le Bi-han, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S.(2004). Brain anatomy in Turnersyndrome: Evidence for impaired social and spatial–numerical net-works. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 840–850.

Molko, N., Cachia, A., Riviere, D., Mangin, J.-F., Bruandet, M., Le Bi-han, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S.(2003). Functional and structuralalterations of the intraparietal sulcus in a developmental dyscalculiaof genetic origin. Neuron, 40, 847–858.

Morewedge, C. K., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2005). The leastlikely of times: How remembering the past biases forecasts of thefuture. Psychological Science, 16, 626–630.

Morris, S. C., Taplin, J. E., & Gelman, S. (2000). Vitalism in naivebiological thinking. Developmental Psychology, 36, 582–595.

Moutier, S., & Houde, O.(2003). Judgement under uncertainty and con-junction fallacy inhibition training. Thinking and Reasoning, 9,185–201.

Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K.(1967). Time required for judgements ofnumerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520.

298 Bibliography

Muntersbjorn, M. M.(2003). Representational innovation and mathemat-ical ontology. Synthese, 134, 159–180.

Murray, M.(2008). Four arguments that the cognitive psychology of reli-gion undermines the justification of religious belief. In J. Bulbulia,R. Sosis, E. Harris, R. Genet, C. Genet, & K. Wyman (Eds.), Theevolution of religion: Studies, theories, and critiques (pp. 393–398).Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press.

Naets, J. (2010). How to define a number? A general epistemologicalaccount of Simon Stevin’s art of defining. Topoi, 29, 77–86.

Nagel, J. (in press). Intuitions and experiments: A defense of the casemethod in epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Re-search.

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83,435–450.

Negishi, H., Ueda, K., Kuriyama, M., Kato, M., Kawaguchi, H., & At-sumori, H.(2005). Change of mental representation with the exper-tise of mental abacus. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli(Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII annual conference of the CognitiveScience Society (pp. 1606–1611). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Nersessian, N. J.(1999). Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. InL. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-basedreasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 5–22). Malden & Oxford:Blackwell.

Netz, R. (1999). Linguistic formulae as cognitive tools. Pragmatics andCognition, 7, 147–176.

Netz, R.(2002). Counter culture: Towards a history of Greek numeracy.History of Science, 40, 321–352.

New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attentionfor animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,104, 16598—16603.

Nichols, R. (2006). Why is the history of philosophy worth our study?Metaphilosophy, 37, 34–52.

Nichols, S. (2002). On the genealogy of norms: A case for the role ofemotion in cultural evolution. Philosophy of Science, 69, 234–255.

Nieder, A., & Miller, E. K.(2003). Coding of cognitive magnitude: Com-pressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontalcortex. Neuron, 37, 149–157.

Bibliography 299

Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought. How Asians and west-erners think di↵erently . . . and why. New York: Free Press.

Norenzayan, A., Atran, S., Faulkner, J., & Schaller, M. (2006). Memoryand mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitivenarratives. Cognitive Science, 30, 531–553.

Novell, J. R. (1990). From Da Vinci to Harvey: The development ofmechanical analogy from 1500 to 1650. Journal of the Royal Societyof Medicine, 83, 396–398.

Oaks, J. A. (2007). Medieval Arabic algebra as an artificial language.Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35, 543–575.

O’Brien, M. J., & Lyman, R. L.(2000). Darwinian evolutionism is appli-cable to historical archaeology. International Journal of HistoricalArchaeology,, 4, 71–112.

Okasha, S. (2003). Fodor on cognition, modularity, and adaptationism.Philosophy of Science, 70, 68–88.

Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Okasha, S. (2010). Altruism researchers must cooperate. Nature, 467,653–655.

Oldham, M. C., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2006). Conservationand evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chim-panzee brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ofthe United States of America, 103, 17973–17978.

Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants under-stand false beliefs? Science, 308, 255–258.

Osawa, A., & Maeshima, S. (2009). Gerstmann’s syndrome in a patientwith left thalamic hemorrhage. Neurology Asia, 14, 161–164.

Owen, R.(1849). On the nature of limbs. A discourse. London: John VanVoorst.

Papineau, D.(1993). Philosophical naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Papineau, D. (2000). The evolution of knowledge. In P. Carruthers &

A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind. Modularity,language and meta-cognition (pp. 170–206). Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Pascalis, O., & Bachevalier, J. (1998). Face recognition in primates: Across-species study. Behavioural Processes, 43, 87–96.

Pelletier, F. J., Elio, R., & Hanson, P. (2008). Is logic all in our heads?From naturalism to psychologism. Studia Logica, 88, 3–66.

300 Bibliography

Petersson, K. M., Silva, C., Castro-Caldas, A., Ingvar, M., & Reis, A.(2007). Literacy: A cultural influence on functional left-right dif-ferences in the inferior parietal cortex. European Journal of Neuro-science, 26, 791–799.

Pfungst, O.(1911 [2001]). Clever Hans (The horse of Mr. von Osten): Acontribution to experimental animal and human psychology (C. L.Rahn, Trans.). New York, NY: Henry Holt.

Phillips, W., Shankar, M., & Santos, L.(2010). Essentialism in the absenceof language? Evidence from rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). De-velopmental Science, 13, F1–F7.

Piaget, J. (1929 [2007]). The child’s conception of the world. Plymouth:Rowman & Littlefield.

Piaget, J.(1952). The child’s conception of number. New York: Norton.Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approx-

imate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306,499–503.

Pigliucci, M., & Boudry, M.(2011). Why machine-information metaphorsare bad for science and science education. Science & Education, 20,453–471.

Pinker, S.(1997). How the mind works. London: Allen Lane.Pinker, S. (2005). So how does the mind work? Mind & Language, 20,

1–24.Pinker, S.(2007). The stu↵ of thought: Language as a window into human

nature. New York: Viking.Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and proper function. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. New York: Oxford

University Press.Plato. (ca. 380 B.C.E. [2000]). Meno. In S. M. Cahn (Ed.), Exploring

philosophy. An introductory anthology (pp. 117–151). New York:Oxford University Press.

Pletser, V., & Huylebrouck, D.(1999). The Ishango artefact: The missingbase 12 link. Forma, 14, 339–346.

Poling, D. A., & Evans, E. M. (2004). Are dinosaurs the rule or theexception? Developing concepts of death and extinction. CognitiveDevelopment, 19, 363–383.

Pollard, B.(2005). Naturalizing the space of reasons. International Jour-nal of Philosophical Studies, 13, 69–82.

Bibliography 301

Popper, K. (1994). In search of a better world. Lectures and essays fromthirty years. London: Routledge.

Potts, R. (1998). Variation selection in hominid evolution. EvolutionaryAnthropology, 7, 81–96.

Povinelli, D. J. (2000a). Folk physics for apes. The chimpanzee’s theoryof how the world works. Oxford and New York: Oxford UniversityPress.

Povinelli, D. J.(2000b). The minds of humans and apes are di↵erent out-comes of an evolutionary experiment. In S. Fitzpatrick & J. Bruer(Eds.), Carving our destiny: Scientific research faces a new millen-nium (pp. 1–40). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciencesand John Henry Press.

Povinelli, D. J., & Vonk, J. (2003). Chimpanzee minds: Suspiciouslyhuman? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 157–160.

Preissler, M. A., & Bloom, P. (2007). Two-year-olds appreciate the dualnature of pictures. Psychological Science, 18, 1-2.

Preuss, T. M., Caceres, M., Oldham, M. C., & Geschwind, D. H. (2004).Human brain evolution: Insights from microarrays. Nature ReviewsGenetics, 5, 850–860.

Price, G. (1972). Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Annalsof Human Genetics, 35, 485–490.

Prinz, J. J. (2002). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptualbasis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pyysiainen, I.(2003). True fiction: Philosophy and psychology of religiousbelief. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 109–125.

Pyysiainen, I., Lindeman, M., & Honkela, T.(2003). Counterintuitivenessas the hallmark of religiosity. Religion, 33, 341–355.

Qin, Y., Carter, C. S., Silk, E. M., Stenger, V. A., Fissell, K., Goode,A., & Anderson, J. R. (2004). The change of the brain activationpatterns as children learn algebra equation solving. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,101, 5686–5691.

Quallo, M. M., Price, C. J., Ueno, K., Asamizuya, T., Cheng, K., Lemon,R. N., & Iriki, A.(2009). Gray and white matter changes associatedwith tool-use learning in macaque monkeys. Proceedings of the Na-tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106,18379–18384.

Quine, W. V. O. (1969a). Epistemology naturalized. In W. V. O. Quine

302 Bibliography

(Ed.), Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 69–90). NewYork: Columbia University Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1969b). Natural kinds. In W. V. O. Quine (Ed.),Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 114–138). New York:Columbia University Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1975). The nature of natural knowledge. In S. Gut-tenplan (Ed.), Mind and language: Wolfson College lectures (pp.67–81). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1995). From stimulus to science. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

Ramsey, G. (2006). Block fitness. Studies in History and Philosophy ofBiological and Biomedical Sciences, 37, 484–498.

Real, L. A.(1991). Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitivearchitecture. Science, 253, 980–986.

Recanati, F. (1997). Can we believe what we do not understand? Mind& Language, 12, 84–100.

Regier, T., Kay, P., Gilbert, A. L., & Ivry, R. B. (2010). Language andthought: Which side are you on, anyway? In B. Malt & P. Wol↵(Eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience(pp. 165–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reid, T. (1764). An inquiry into the human mind, on the principles ofcommon sense. Edinburgh: Millar, Kincaid and Bell.

Resnik, M. D.(1982). Mathematics as the science of patterns: Epistemol-ogy. Nous, 16, 95–105.

Restivo, S. (1992). Mathematics in society and history. Sociological in-quiries. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone. How cul-ture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress.

Rips, L. J., Asmuth, J., & Bloomfield, A.(2006). Giving the boot to thebootstrap: How not to learn the natural numbers. Cognition, 101,B51–B60.

Rips, L. J., Bloomfield, A., & Asmuth, J.(2008). From numerical conceptsto concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 623–642.

Robillard, P.-Y., Dekker, G. A., & Hulsey, T. C. (2002). Evolutionaryadaptations to pre-eclampsia/eclampsia in humans: Low fecund-ability rate, loss of oestrus, prohibitions of incest and systematicpolyandry. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 47, 104–

Bibliography 303

111.Rogers, A. R.(1988). Does biology constrain culture? American Anthro-

pologist, 90, 819–831.Rogers, D. S., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2008). Natural selection and cultural

rates of change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesof the United States of America, 105, 3416–3420.

Rollenhagen, J. E., & Olson, C. R. (2000). Mirror-image confusion insingle neurons of the macaque inferotemporal cortex. Science, 287,1506–1508.

Rosenberg, K., & Trevathan, W.(2002). Birth, obstetrics and human evo-lution. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 1199–1206.

Roth, P. (2007). Naturalism without fears. In S. P. Turner & M. W.Risjord (Eds.), Philosophy of anthropology and sociology (pp. 683–708). Amsterdam & Oxford: North-Holland.

Rowlands, M.(1997). Teleological semantics. Mind, 106, 279–303.Roy, R.(2003). Babylonian Pythagoras’ theorem, the early history of zero

and a polemic on the study of the history of science. Resonance, 8,30–40.

Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F.(2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science:An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521–562.

Rugani, R., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G.(2008). Discrimination of smallnumerosities in young chicks. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 388–399.

Rusconi, E., Walsh, V., & Butterworth, B. (2005). Dexterity with num-bers: rTMS over left angular gyrus disrupts finger gnosis and num-ber processing. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1609–1624.

Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.(1996). Mental mod-els of the Earth, Sun, and Moon: Indian children’s cosmologies.Cognitive Development, 11, 491–521.

Samarapungavan, A., & Wiers, R. W. (1997). Children’s thoughts onthe origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. CognitiveScience, 21, 147–177.

Samuels, R. (2000). Massively modular minds: Evolutionary psychol-ogy and cognitive architecture. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamber-lain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind. Modularity, languageand meta-cognition (pp. 13–46). Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

304 Bibliography

Samuels, R.(2002). Nativism in cognitive science. Mind & Language, 17,233–265.

Samuels, R. (2004). Innateness in cognitive science. Trends in CognitiveSciences, 8, 136–141.

Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Arono↵, M. (2005). The emergenceof grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102, 2661–2665.

Sandrini, M., Rossini, P. M., & Miniussi, C. (2004). The di↵erentialinvolvement of inferior parietal lobule in number comparison: ArTMS study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1902–1909.

Sarich, V. M., & Wilson, A. C. (1967). Immunological time scale forhominid evolution. Science, 158, 1200–1203.

Sarnecka, B. W., & Gelman, S. A. (2004). Six does not just mean a lot :Preschoolers see number words as specific. Cognition, 92, 329–352.

Saxe, G. B. (1981). Body parts as numerals: A developmental analysisof numeration among the Oksapmin in Papua New Guinea. ChildDevelopment, 52, 306–316.

Saxe, G. B. (1985). E↵ects of schooling on arithmetical understandings:Studies with Oksapmin children in Papua New Guinea. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 77, 503–513.

Saxe, R., Tenenbaum, J., & Carey, S. (2005). Secret agents: Inferencesabout hidden causes by 10- and 12-month-old infants. PsychologicalScience, 16, 995–1001.

Schick, K. D., Toth, N., Garufi, G., Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Rumbaugh,D., & Sevcik, R. (1999). Continuing investigations into the stonetool-making and tool-using capabilities of a bonobo (Pan paniscus).Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 821–832.

Schliesser, E.(2011). Newton’s challenge to philosophy: A programmaticessay. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for theHistory of Philosophy of Science, 1, 101–128.

Schlimm, D., & Neth, H.(2008). Modeling ancient and modern arithmeticpractices: Addition and multiplication with arabic and roman nu-merals. In V. Sloutsky, B. Love, & K. McRae (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe 30th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin,TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey,D.(2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dis-

Bibliography 305

sent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 6, 1080–1093.

Schwartz, D. L., Martin, T., & Pfa↵man, J. (2005). How mathematicspropels the development of physical knowledge. Journal of Cogni-tion and Development, 6, 65–88.

Schwitzgebel, E., & Gordon, M. S.(2000). How well do we know our ownconscious experience? The case of human echolocation. Philosoph-ical Topics, 28, 235–246.

Segal, G. (1996). The modularity of theory of mind. In P. Carruthers& P. K. Smith (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind (pp. 141–157).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl& M. Scriven (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of sci-ence, foundations of science and the concepts of psychology and psy-choanalysis (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis: University of MinnesotaPress.

Semaw, S., Renne, P., Harris, J. W. K., Feibel, C. S., Bernor, R. L.,Fesseha, N., & Mowbray, K.(1997). 2.5-Million-year-old stone toolsfrom Gona, Ethiopia. Nature, 385, 333–336.

Senut, B., Pickford, M., Gommery, D., Mein, P., Cheboi, K., & Coppens,Y. (2001). First hominid from the Miocene (Lukeino Formation,Kenya). Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences–Series IIA,332, 137–144.

Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., & Marler, P.(1980). Monkey responses tothree di↵erent alarm calls: Evidence of predator classification andsemantic communication. Science, 210, 801–803.

Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Re-flections on processes and objects as di↵erent sides of the same coin.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.

Sha↵er, M. (2008). Bayesianism, convergence and social epistemology.Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 5, 203–219.

Shapiro, L., & Epstein, W. (1998). Evolutionary theory meets cognitivepsychology: A more selective perspective. Mind & Language, 13,171–194.

Shapiro, S. (1997). Philosophy of mathematics: Structure and ontology.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shelishch, P. (1982). A quantitative study of biologists in the 18th and19th centuries. Scientometrics, 4, 317–329.

306 Bibliography

Shelley, C. (1999). Multiple analogies in archaeology. Philosophy of Sci-ence, 66, 579–605.

Sherry, D. F., & Schacter, D. L.(1987). The evolution of multiple memorysystems. Psychological Review, 94, 439–454.

Shimojo, S., & Ichikawa, S. (1989). Intuitive reasoning about probabil-ity: Theoretical and experimental analyses of the “problem of threeprisoners”. Cognition, 32, 1–24.

Shogenji, T. (2000). Self-dependent justification without circularity.British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, 287–298.

Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L. (2008). The relation between essentialistbeliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32, 1049–1062.

Shultz, T. R.(1982a). Causal reasoning in the social and nonsocial realms.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 14, 307–322.

Shultz, T. R. (1982b). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs for theSociety for Research in Child Development, 47, 1–51.

Siegal, M., Butterworth, G., & Newcombe, P. A. (2004). Culture andchildren’s cosmology. Developmental Science, 7, 308–324.

Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L.(2004). Development of numerical estimationin young children. Child Development, 75, 428–444.

Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E.(2003). The development of numerical estima-tion: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity.Psychological Science, 14, 237–243.

Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011). An integratedtheory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psy-chology, 62, 273–296.

Simon, H. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment.Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.

Simon, H. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of theAmerican Philosophical Society, 106, 457–482.

Simon, O., Mangin, J.-F., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S.(2002).Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron, 33, 475–487.

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained, stochasticbehavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspec-tives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494.

Simpson, G. G. (1950). Some principles of historical biology bearing onhuman origins. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative

Bibliography 307

Biology, 15, 55–66.Slater, A., & Quinn, P. C.(2001). Face recognition in the newborn infant.

Infant and Child Development, 10, 21–24.Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.

Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H. J., & Haynes, J. D. (2008). Uncon-

scious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. NatureNeuroscience, 11, 543–545.

Spaepen, E., Coppola, M., Spelke, E. S., Carey, S. E., & Goldin-Meadow,S. (2011). Number without a language model. Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108,3163–3168.

Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science,14, 29–56.

Spelke, E. S.(2003). What makes us smart? Core knowledge and naturallanguage. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language inmind. Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 277–311).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. DevelopmentalScience, 10, 89–96.

Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A., & Woodward, A. L.(1995). Infants’ knowledgeof object motion and human action. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, &A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate(pp. 44–78). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Spelke, E. S., & Tsivkin, A. (2001). Language and number: A bilingualtraining study. Cognition, 78, 45–88.

Sperber, D. (1985). Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemi-ology of representations. Man, 20, 73–89.

Sperber, D. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology ofrepresentations. In L. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mappingthe mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 39–67).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture. A naturalistic approach. Oxford:Blackwell.

Sperber, D.(1997). Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind & Language, 12,67–83.

Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. A. (2004). The cognitive foundations ofcultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8,

308 Bibliography

40–46.Spicer, F.(2010). Cultural variations in folk epistemic intuitions. Review

of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 515–529.Staal, F. (2006). Artificial languages across sciences and civilizations.

Journal of Indian Philosophy, 34, 89–141.Staddon, J. E. R. (1983). Adaptive behavior and learning. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.Stamos, D. N. (1996). Popper, falsifiability, and evolutionary biology.

Biology & Philosophy, 11, 161–191.Stamos, D. N. (2003). The species problem. Biological species, ontology,

and the metaphysics of biology. Lanham: Lexington.Stamos, D. N.(2005). Pre-Darwinian taxonomy and essentialism—A reply

to Mary Winsor. Biology & Philosophy, 20, 79–96.Starkey, P., & Cooper, R. G. (1980). Perception of numbers by human

infants. Science, 210, 1033–1035.Stedall, J. A.(2001). Of our own nation: John Wallis’s account of math-

ematical learning in medieval England. Historia Mathematica, 2,73–122.

Stephens, C. L. (2001). When is it selectively advantageous to have truebeliefs? Sandwiching the better safe than sorry argument. Philo-sophical Studies, 105, 161–189.

Sterelny, K. (2003). Thought in a hostile world: The evolution of humancognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sterelny, K. (2004). Externalism, epistemic artefacts and the extendedmind. In R. Schantz (Ed.), The externalist challenge (pp. 239–254).Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Sterelny, K. (2006). Folk logic and animal rationality. In S. Hurley &M. Nudds (Eds.), Rational animals? (pp. 293–311). Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Sterelny, K. (2007). SNAFUS: An evolutionary perspective. BiologicalTheory, 2, 317–328.

Stewart-Williams, S.(2005). Innate ideas as a naturalistic source of meta-physical knowledge. Biology & Philosophy, 20, 791–814.

Stich, S. (1990). The fragmentation of reason: Preface to a pragmatictheory of cognitive evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Stout, D., Quade, J., Semaw, S., Rogers, M., & Levin, N. E.(2005). Rawmaterial selectivity of the earliest stone toolmakers at Gona, Afar,Ethiopia. Journal of Human Evolution, 48, 365–380.

Bibliography 309

Suddendorf, T., Addis, D. R., & Corballis, M. C. (2009). Mental timetravel and the shaping of the human mind. Philosophical Transac-tions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1317–1324.

Sullivan, P. R. (2009). Objects limit human comprehension. Biology &Philosophy, 24, 65–79.

Surian, L., Caldi, S., & Sperber, D. (2007). Attribution of beliefs by13-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 18, 580–586.

Swisher III, C. C., Curtis, G. H., Jacob, T., Getty, A. G., Suprijo, A., &Widiasmoro. (1994). Age of the earliest known hominids in Java,Indonesia. Science, 263, 1118–1121.

Tan, L. H., Feng, C. M., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H.(2001). An fMRI studywith written Chinese. NeuroReport, 12, 83–88.

Tang, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, K., Feng, S., Ji, Y., Shen, J., Reiman, E.,& Liu, Y. (2006). Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped bycultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of theUnited States of America, 103, 10775–10780.

Tattersall, I. (2000). Paleoanthropology: The last half-century. Evolu-tionary Anthropology, 9, 2–15.

Taylor, M., Esbensen, B., & Bennett, R. (1994). Children’s understand-ing of knowledge acquisition: The tendency for children to reportthat they have always known what they have just learned. ChildDevelopment, 65, 1581–1604.

Temple, E., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Brain mechanisms of quantity aresimilar in 5-year-old children and adults. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 7836–7841.

Tentori, K., Bonini, N., & Osherson, D. (2004). The conjunction fallacy:A misunderstanding about conjunction? Cognitive Science, 28,467–477.

Thieme, H. (1997). Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany.Nature, 385, 807–810.

Thune, C. E. (1978). Numbers and counting in Loboda: An example ofa non-numerical oriented culture. Papua New Guinea Journal ofEducation, 14, 69–80.

Thurston, W.(2006). On proof and progress in mathematics. In R. Hersh(Ed.), 18 unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics (pp.37–55). New York: Springer.

Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cam-

310 Bibliography

bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Tomasello, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition

unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind& Language, 18, 121–147.

Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Moscovitch, M., Weinrib, O., & Kanwisher,N. (2000). Response properties of the human fusiform face area.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 257–280.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of cul-ture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adaptedmind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp.19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1995). Foreword. In S. Baron-Cohen. Mind-blindness. An essay on autism and theory of mind (pp. xi–xviii).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tratman, E. K.(1976). A late Upper Palaeolithic calculator (?), Gough’scave, Cheddar, Somerset. Proceedings of the University of BristolSpelaeological Society, 14, 123–129.

Tudusciuc, O., & Nieder, A. (2007). Neuronal population coding of con-tinuous and discrete quantity in the primate posterior parietal cor-tex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the UnitedStates of America, 104, 14513–14518.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty. Sci-ence, 185, 1124–1131.

Uller, C., Carey, S., Huntley-Fenner, G., & Klatt, L. (1999). What rep-resentations might underlie infant numerical knowledge? CognitiveDevelopment, 14, 1–36.

Uller, C., Jaeger, R., Guidry, G., & Martin, C. (2003). Salamanders(Plethodon cinereus) go for more: Rudiments of number in an am-phibian. Animal Cognition, 6, 105–112.

Uttal, D. H., Scudder, K. V., & DeLoache, J. S. (1997). Manipulativesas symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects toteach mathematics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,18, 37–54.

van Fraassen, B. C.(1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon.van Ginkel, W. P., & van Knippenberg, D.(2009). Knowledge about the

distribution of information and group decision making: When andwhy does it work? Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses, 108, 218–229.

Bibliography 311

van Inwagen, P. (2006). What is naturalism? What is analytical philos-ophy? In A. Corradini, S. Galvan, & E. J. Lowe (Eds.), Analyticphilosophy without naturalism (pp. 74–88). London & New York:Routledge.

Van Schaik, C. P., Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., Galdikas, B., Knott, C., Sin-gleton, I., Suzuki, A., Utami, S. S., & Merrill, M.(2003). Orangutancultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299, 102–105.

Varley, R. A., Klessinger, N. J. C., Romanowski, C. A. J., & Siegal, M.(2005). Agrammatic but numerate. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 3519–3524.

Vartanian, O., & Goel, G.(2007). Neural correlates of creative cognition.In C. Martindale, P. Locher, & V. M. Petrov (Eds.), Evolutionaryand neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity and the arts(pp. 195–207). Amityville: Baywood Publishing.

Venkatraman, V., Ansari, D., & Chee, M. W. L.(2005). Neural correlatesof symbolic and non-symbolic arithmetic. Neuropsychologia, 43,744–753.

Vlassis, J.(2004). Making sense of the minus sign or becoming flexible in‘negativity’. Learning and Instruction, 14, 469–484.

Vlassis, J.(2008). The role of mathematical symbols in the development ofnumber conceptualization: The case of the minus sign. PhilosophicalPsychology, 21, 555–570.

Vonk, J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2006). Similarity and di↵erence in the con-ceptual systems of primates: The unobservability hypothesis. InE. Wasserman & T. Zentall (Eds.), Comparative cognition: Exper-imental explorations of animal intelligence (pp. 363–387). Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Vosniadou, S. (1994). Universal and culture-specific properties of chil-dren’s mental models of the Earth. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gel-man (Eds.), Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition andculture (pp. 412–430). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.(1987). Theories of knowledge restructuringin development. Review of Educational Research, 57, 51–67.

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. (1992). Mental models of the Earth: Astudy of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24,535–585.

312 Bibliography

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. (1994). Mental models of the day/nightcycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–183.

Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual developmentto science education: A psychological point of view. InternationalJournal of Science Education, 20, 1213–1230.

Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I., & Ikospentaki, K. (2004). Modes of knowingand ways of reasoning in elementary astronomy. Cognitive Devel-opment, 19, 203–222.

Wagner, G. P., & Altenberg, L. (1996). Complex adaptations and theevolution of evolvability. Evolution, 50, 967–976.

Wagner-Dobler, R., & Berg, J.(1999). Physics 1800–1900: A quantitativeoutline. Scientometrics, 46, 213–285.

Wallace, A. R.(1855). On the law which has regulated the introduction ofnew species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 16, 184–196.

Wallace, A. R. (1858). On the tendency of varieties to depart indefi-nitely from the original type. Proceedings of the Linnean Society ofLondon, 3, 53–62.

Wallace, A. R.(1905). My life: A record of events and opinions. London:Chapman & Hall.

Walsh, D. M., Lewens, T., & Ariew, A.(2002). The trials of life: Naturalselection and random drift. Philosophy of Science, 69, 452–473.

Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category struc-ture in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1–40.

Ward, T. B.(1998). Analogical distance and purpose in creative thought:Mental leaps versus mental hops. In K. Holyoak, D. Gentner, &B. Kokinov (Eds.), Advances in analogy research: Integration oftheory and data from the cognitive, computational , and neural sci-ences (pp. 221–230). Sofia: New Bulgarian University.

Ward, T. B., Patterson, M. J., Sifonis, C. M., Dodds, R. A., & Saunders,K. N. (2002). The role of graded category structure in imaginativethought. Memory and Cognition, 30, 199–216.

Wassmann, J., & Dasen, P. R.(1994). Yupno number system and count-ing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 78–94.

Watson, J. C., & Arp, R.(2008). Checks and balances: The welcomed ten-sion between philosophy and science. Quarterly Review of Biology,83, 17–28.

Waxman, S. (2005). Why is the concept ‘living thing’ so elusive? Con-cepts, languages, and the development of folkbiology. In W.-K.

Bibliography 313

Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, & P. Wol↵(Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory. Essays inhonor of Douglas L. Medin (pp. 49–67). Washington: AmericanPsychological Association.

Wegener, A. (1912). Die Entstehung der Kontinente. Geologische Rund-schau, 3, 276–292.

Wegner, D. M. (2003a). The mind’s best trick: How we experience con-scious will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 65–69.

Wegner, D. M.(2003b). The mind’s self-portrait. Annals of the New YorkAcademy of Sciences, 1001, 212–225.

Weinberg, J. S., Nichols, S., & Stich, S.(2001). What is a mechanism? Acounterfactual account. Philosophical Topics, 21, 429–460.

Weisberg, M., & Muldoon, R.(2009). Epistemic landscapes and the divi-sion of cognitive labor. Philosophy of Science, 76, 225–252.

Wellman, H. M., & Miller, K. F. (1986). Thinking about nothing: De-velopment of concepts of zero. British Journal of DevelopmentalPsychology, 4, 31–42.

Wells, W. C. (1818). Two essays: One upon single vision with two eyes;the other on dew. A letter to the Right Hon. Lloyd, Lord Kenyonand an account of a female of the white race of mankind, part ofwhose skin resembles that of a negro; with some observations on thecauses of the di↵erences in colour and form between the white andnegro races of men. Edinburgh: Archibald Constable & Co.

Wenger, A., & Fowers, B. J.(2008). Positive illusions in parenting: Everychild is above average. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3,611–634.

Whalen, J., Gallistel, C., & Gelman, R.(1999). Nonverbal counting in hu-mans: The psychophysics of number representation. PsychologicalScience, 10, 130–137.

White, T. D.(1995). African omnivores: Global climatic change and Plio-Pleistocene hominids and suids. In E. S. Vrba, G. H. Denton, T. C.Partridge, & L. H. Burckle (Eds.), Paleoclimate and evolution, withemphasis on human origins (pp. 369–384). New Haven and London:Yale University Press.

White, T. D., Suwa, G., & Asfaw, B.(1995). Australopithecus ramidus, anew species of early hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia (corrigendum).Nature, 375, 88.

Whitehead, A. N. (1911). An introduction to mathematics. London:

314 Bibliography

Williams & Northgate.Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V.,

Sugiyama, Y., Tutin, C. E. G., Wrangham, R. W., & Boesch, C.(1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399, 682–685.

Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality: Selected writings ofBenjamin Lee Whorf (J. B. Carroll, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

Wimpenny, J. H., Weir, A. A. S., & Kachelnik, A.(2011). New Caledoniancrows use tools for non-foraging activities. Animal Cognition, 14,459–464.

Wolpo↵, M. H., Hawks, J., & Caspari, R. (2000). Multiregional, notmultiple origins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 112,129–136.

Wylie, A.(1985). The reaction against analogy. Advances in archaeologi-cal method and theory, 8, 63–111.

Wynn, K. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36,155–193.

Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature,358, 749–750.

Wynn, K.(1998a). An evolved capacity for number. In D. D. Cummins &C. Allen (Eds.), The evolution of mind (pp. 107–126). New York:Oxford University Press.

Wynn, K.(1998b). Psychological foundations of number: Numerical com-petence in human infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 296–303.

Wynn, K., & Chiang, W.(1998). Limits to infants’ knowledge of objects:The case of magical appearance. Psychological Science, 9, 448–455.

Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants’ metaphysics: The case of numericalidentity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111–153.

Xu, F., & Spelke, E. S.(2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 74, B1–B11.

Yellen, J. E., Brooks, A. S., Cornelissen, E., Mehlman, M. J., & Stewart,K.(1995). A Middle Stone Age worked bone industry from Katanda,Upper Semliki Valley, Zaire. Science, 268, 553–556.

Zeki, S., Watson, J. D. G., Lueck, C. J., Friston, K. J., Kennard, C., &Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1991). A direct demonstration of functionalspecialization in human visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 17,641–649.

Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1995). A representational analysis of nu-

Bibliography 315

meration systems. Cognition, 57, 271–295.Zhang, J., & Wang, H. (2005). The e↵ect of external representations on

numeric tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A,817–838.