The Barossa Council · (Delete/Replace/Insert) Re-numbering required (Y/N) Subsequent policy...

The Barossa Council

Mount Pleasant Residential and Employment Area

THE AMENDMENT

By the Council

For Approval

Declared by the Minister for Urban Development and Planning to be an approved amendment under section 25 (18), Development Act 1993.

……………..…………………………. Minister’s Signature

Date of Gazette………………………

The Barossa Council Mount Pleasant Residential and Employment Area Development Plan Amendment

Amendment Instructions

Amendment Instructions Table

Name of Local Government Area: The Barossa Council

Name of Development Plan(s): The Barossa Council Development Plan

Name of DPA: Mount Pleasant Residential and Employment Area

These amendment instructions are based on The Barossa Council Development Plan dated 26 August 2010.

Where amendments to this Development Plan have been authorised after the aforementioned consolidation date, consequential changes to the following amendment instructions will be made as necessary to give effect to this amendment. Amendment Instruction Number

�� Objective (obj) �� Principle of Development Control (PDC) �� Desired Character Statement (DCS) �� Map/Table No �� Other (specify)

Method Of change. (Delete/Replace/Insert)

Re-numbering required (Y/N)

Subsequent policy Cross-references Requiring update (Y/N)

COUNCIL WIDE OR GENERAL PROVISIONS (including figures and illustrations contained in the text)

Form of Development

1. Objective 2 Delete Y N

2. Objective 7 and associated supporting text Delete Y N

3. PDC 5 Delete Y N

4. PDC 8(d) Delete N N

5. PDC 11(a) and (b) Delete Y N

6. PDC 11(d)-(k) Delete N N

7. PDC 12-13 Delete Y N

8. PDC 15 Delete Y N

Land Division

9. Headings: “Land Division” and “OBJECTIVES” Delete N N

10. Objectives 15 and 16 Delete Y N

11. Heading: “PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL” and associated text

Delete N N

12. Heading: “General” Delete N N


14. Headings: “Stormwater Management” and “Major system”

Delete N N


16. DT 35.1–35.2 Delete N N


18. Heading: “Minor system” Delete N N

The Barossa Council Mount Pleasant Residential and Employment Area Development Plan Amendment Amendment Instructions

4

Amendment Instruction Number






20. DT 37.1–37.2 Delete N N

21. Heading: “Water Quality Management” Delete N N


23. Heading: “Stormwater Use” Delete N N


Residential Land Division

25. Headings: “Residential Land Division” and “Residential allotments”

Delete N N


27. DT 40.1-40.5 Delete N N


29. Heading: “Movement Networks” Delete N N


31. Heading: “Pedestrian and Cyclist Facilities” Delete N N


33. DT 49.1-49.2 Delete N N


35. Heading: “Road Reserve Width” Delete N N


37. Heading: “On-street Parking” Delete N N


39. DT 54.1 Delete N N


41. Heading: “Housing on Major Traffic Routes” Delete N N


Rural Areas


44. Objective 21(a) Delete Y N


46. Heading: “Noise Pollution” Delete N N


48. DT 67.1-67.3 Delete N N









Keeping of Animals


51. PDC 101(c) Delete N N

TOWNSHIPS: Residential Development

52. Objective 47(d) Insert at end “and” N N

53. Objective 47(e) Replace with “(e) assist conservation of energy”

N N

54. Objective 47(f) Delete N N


56. Heading: “Interface with Industrial and Rural Activities”

Delete N N


TOWNSHIPS: Industrial and Commercial


59. Heading: “Chemical and Materials Storage” Delete N N


61. DT 217.1-217.3 Delete N N

62. Heading: “Hours of Operation and Noise” Delete N N


64. DT 218.1-218.3 Delete N N

65. Heading: “Outdoor Lighting” Delete Y N


67. DT 219.1-219.2 Delete N N

ENVIRONMENTAL: General



70. Objective 62 Replace with: “The protection and maintenance of the health of the natural system and the community by encouraging the recycling of renewable and non-renewable resources at all levels of consumption (including residential, commercial, industrial and rural activities.”

N N


6








73. PDC 230 Replace with “The nature, features and general character of areas and places should be conserved which are of special historical (including archaeological) significance or heritage value or scientific interest”

N N

ENVIRONMENTAL: Vegetation and Soils

74. Objective 63 and associated text Replace with: “Conservation and enhancement of trees of historic, local, or particular visual significance.”

Y N

75. Objective 64-67 Delete Y N


77. PDC 232 Replace with: “Trees and other vegetation, including native flora and bushland remnants, which are of special visual, historical or scientific significance or interest or heritage value should be conserved and restored, and their value and function not compromised by development.”

N N






ENVIRONMENTAL: Water and Drainage



85. Figure Baro/2 and Baro/3 Delete N N












90. DT 263.1 Delete Y N


92. DT 264.1-264.2 Delete N N

93. Heading: “Irrigation” Delete N N


ENVIRONMENTAL: Flood Protection

95. Heading: “Flood Protection”, “OBJECTIVES” and “PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL”

Delete N N






ENVIRONMENTAL: Waste and Pollution Management

101. Objectives 77-79 Delete Y N

ENVIRONMENTAL: Appearance of Land and Buildings

102. PDC 350(g) Delete Y N

ENVIRONMENTAL: Advertisements


ENVIRONMENTAL: Bushfire Protection

104. Heading: “Bushfire Protection”, “OBJECTIVES” and “PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL”

Delete N N

105. Introductory text Delete N N



ENVIRONMENTAL: Catchment Water Management

108. Objective 102 and associated text and notes Delete Y N

109. Objective 104-113 and associated text and notes

Y N


111. Diagram 1.1 and associated note Delete Y N



8






113. PDC 389 and associated notes Replace with: “The arrangement of roads, allotments, reserves and open space should enable the provision of a stormwater drainage system that integrates with the open space system and surrounding area

Y N

114. Heading: “Dams and Levees (including the collection or diversion of water)”

Delete N N

115. PDC 390 and associated note Delete Y N


117. Heading: “Native Vegetation” Delete N N


119. Heading: “Storage of Chemicals or Other Materials”

Delete N N


121. Heading: “Site Contamination” Delete

122. PDC 401 and associated notes Delete Y N

123. Immediately following last PDC (currently PDC 401)

Insert contents of Attachment A

Y N

ZONE AND/OR POLICY AREA AND/OR PRECINCT PROVISIONS (including figures and illustrations contained in the text)

124. New Zone Township Zone

Insert contents of Attachment B immediately following the Country Township Zone

Y N

125. New Residential Policy Area 41 – Mount Pleasant

Insert contents of Attachment C immediately following the new Township Zone

Y N

126. New Mixed Use Policy Area 42 Insert contents of Attachment D immediately following the new Township Zone

Y N

127. New Deferred Urban Zone Insert contents of Attachment E immediately following Historic (Conservation) Policy Area – Stockwell

Y N








RESIDENTIAL (WATERSHED) ZONE

128. Introduction Replace “Maps Baro/62 and 63” with “Maps Baro/62, 63 and 68”

N N

NEIGHBOURHOOD CENTRE ZONE


N N

WATERSHED ZONE

130. Introduction Replace “Map Baro/63” with “Maps Baro/63 and 68”

N N

RECREATION ZONE


N N

HISTORIC (CONSERVATION) POLICY AREA – MOUNT PLEASANT

132. Introduction Replace “Map Baro/63” with “Maps Baro/63 and 68”

N N

MAPPING (Structure Plans, Overlays, Enlargements, Zone Maps & Policy Area Maps)

"Insert Map Reference Here"

133. Map Baro/1 (Overlay 1) Enlargement J Structure Plan (Mt Pleasant)

Replace existing Map with the contents of Attachment F

N N

134. Map Baro/2 Replace existing Map with the contents of Attachment G

135. Map Baro/36 Replace existing Map with the contents of Attachment H

N N

136. Map Baro/42 Replace existing Map with the contents of Attachment I

N N

137. Map Baro/43 Replace existing Map with the contents of Attachment J

N N

138. Map Baro/63 Replace existing Map with the contents of Attachment K

N Y

139. New Map: Insert contents of N Y


10






Map Baro/68 Attachment L

ATTACHMENT A

OBJECTIVES 1 Maintenance of the natural environment and systems by limiting development in areas

susceptible to natural hazard risk. 2 Development located away from areas that are vulnerable to, and cannot be adequately

and effectively protected from the risk of natural hazards. 3 Critical community facilities such as hospitals, emergency control centres, major service

infrastructure facilities, and emergency service facilities located where they are not exposed to natural hazard risks.

4 Development located and designed to minimise the risks to safety and property from flooding. 5 Development located to minimise the threat and impact of bushfires on life and property. 6 Expansion of existing non-rural uses directed away from areas of high bushfire risk. 7 The environmental values and ecological health of receiving waterways and marine

environments protected from the release of acid water resulting from the disturbance of acid sulphate soils.

8 Protection of human health and the environment wherever site contamination has been

identified or suspected to have occurred. 9 Appropriate assessment and remediation of site contamination to ensure land is suitable

for the proposed use and provides a safe and healthy living and working environment. 10 Minimisation of harm to life, property and the environment through appropriate location of

development and appropriate storage, containment and handling of hazardous materials.

PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL 1 Development should be excluded from areas that are vulnerable to, and cannot be

adequately and effectively protected from, the risk of hazards. 2 Development located on land subject to hazards as shown on Figures Baro/4 and Baro/5

should not occur unless it is sited, designed and undertaken with appropriate precautions being taken against the relevant hazards.

3 There should not be any significant interference with natural processes in order to reduce

the exposure of development to the risk of natural hazards.

Flooding

4 Development should not occur on land where the risk of flooding is likely to be harmful to

safety or damage property. 5 Development should not be undertaken in areas liable to inundation by tidal, drainage or

flood waters unless the development can achieve all of the following:

(a) it is developed with a public stormwater system capable of catering for a 1 in 100 year average return interval flood event

(b) buildings are designed and constructed to prevent the entry of floodwaters in a

1 in 100 year average return interval flood event. 6 Development, including earthworks associated with development, should not do any of

the following:

(a) impede the flow of floodwaters through the land or other surrounding land (b) increase the potential hazard risk to public safety of persons during a flood

event (c) aggravate the potential for erosion or siltation or lead to the destruction of

vegetation during a flood (d) cause any adverse effect on the floodway function (e) increase the risk of flooding of other land (f) obstruct a watercourse.

Bushfire

7 The following bushfire protection principles of development control apply to development

of land identified as General, Medium and High bushfire risk areas as shown on Figures Baro(BPA)/1 to 16.

8 Development in a Bushfire Protection Area should be in accordance with those

provisions of the Minister’s Code: Undertaking development in Bushfire Protection Areas that are designated as mandatory for Development Plan Consent purposes.

9 Buildings and structures should be located away from areas that pose an unacceptable

bushfire risk as a result of one or more of the following:

(a) vegetation cover comprising trees and/or shrubs (b) poor access (c) rugged terrain (d) inability to provide an adequate building protection zone (e) inability to provide an adequate supply of water for fire-fighting purposes.

10 Residential, tourist accommodation and other habitable buildings should:

(a) be sited on the flatter portion of allotments and avoid steep slopes, especially upper slopes, narrow ridge crests and the tops of narrow gullies, and slopes with a northerly or westerly aspect

(b) be sited in areas with low bushfire hazard vegetation and set back at least 20

metres from existing hazardous vegetation (c) have a dedicated water supply available at all times for fire fighting which:

(i) is sited adjacent to the building or in another convenient location on

the allotment accessible to fire fighting vehicles (ii) comprises a minimum of 5,000 litres in areas shown as General or

Medium Bushfire Risk on Figures Baro(BPA)/1 to 16

(iii) comprises a minimum of 22,000 litres in areas shown as High

Bushfire Risk on Figures Baro(BPA)/1 to 16. 11 Extensions to existing buildings, outbuildings and other ancillary structures should be

sited and constructed using materials to minimise the threat of fire spread to residential, tourist accommodation and other habitable buildings in the event of bushfire.

12 Buildings and structures should be designed and configured to reduce the impact of

bushfire through using simple designs that reduce the potential for trapping burning debris against the building or structure, or between the ground and building floor level in the case of transportable buildings.

13 Land division for residential or tourist accommodation purposes within areas of high

bushfire risk should be limited to those areas specifically set aside for these uses. 14 Where land division does occur it should be designed to:

(a) minimise the danger to residents, other occupants of buildings and fire fighting personnel

(b) minimise the extent of damage to buildings and other property during a bushfire (c) ensure each allotment contains a suitable building site that is located away

from vegetation that would pose an unacceptable risk in the event of bushfire (d) ensure provision of a fire hazard separation zone isolating residential

allotments from areas that pose an unacceptable bushfire risk by containing the allotments within a perimeter road or through other means that achieve an adequate separation.

15 Vehicle access and driveways to properties and public roads created by land division

should be designed and constructed to:

(a) facilitate safe and effective operational use for fire-fighting and other emergency vehicles and residents

(b) provide for two-way vehicular access between areas of fire risk and the nearest

public road. 16 Olive orchards should be located and developed in a manner that minimises their

potential to fuel bushfires.

Salinity

17 Development should not increase the potential for, or result in an increase in, soil and

water salinity. 18 Preservation, maintenance and restoration of locally indigenous plant species should be

encouraged in areas affected by dry land salinity. 19 Irrigated horticulture and pasture should not increase groundwater-induced salinity.

Acid Sulphate Soils

20 Development and activities, including excavation and filling of land, that may lead to the

disturbance of potential or actual acid sulphate soils should be avoided unless such disturbances are managed in a way that effectively avoids the potential for harm or damage to any of the following:

(a) natural water bodies and wetlands

(b) agricultural or aquaculture activities (c) buildings, structures and infrastructure (d) public health.

21 Development, including primary production, aquaculture activities and infrastructure,

should not proceed unless it can be demonstrated that the risk of releasing acid water resulting from the disturbance of acid sulphate soils is minimal.

Site Contamination

22 Development, including land division, should not occur where site contamination has

occurred unless the site has been assessed and remediated as necessary to ensure that it is suitable and safe for the proposed use.

Containment of Chemical and Hazardous Materials

23 Hazardous materials should be stored and contained in a manner that minimises the risk

to public health and safety and the potential for water, land or air contamination. 24 Development that involves the storage and handling of hazardous materials should

ensure that these are contained in designated areas that are secure, readily accessible to emergency vehicles, impervious, protected from rain and stormwater intrusion and other measures necessary to prevent:

(a) discharge of polluted water from the site

(b) contamination of land

(c) airborne migration of pollutants

(d) potential interface impacts with sensitive land uses.

Landslip

25 Land identified as being at risk from landslip as shown on the Overlay Maps -

Development Constraints should not be developed. 26 Development, including associated cut and fill activities, should not lead to an increased

danger from land surface instability or to the potential of landslip occurring on the site or on surrounding land.

27 Development on steep slopes should promote the retention and replanting of vegetation

as a means of stabilising and reducing the possibility of surface movement or disturbance.

28 Development in areas susceptible to landslip should:

(a) incorporate split level designs to minimise cutting into the slope

(b) ensure that cut and fill and heights of faces are minimised

(c) ensure cut and fill is supported with engineered retaining walls or are battered to appropriate grades

(d) control any erosion that will increase the gradient of the slope and decrease stability

(e) ensure the siting and operation of an effluent drainage field does not contribute

to landslip

(f) provide drainage measures to ensure surface stability is not compromised

(g) ensure natural drainage lines are not obstructed.

OBJECTIVES 1 Development located and designed to prevent adverse impact and conflict between land

uses. 2 Protect community health and amenity and support the operation of all desired land

uses. PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL 1 Development should not detrimentally affect the amenity of the locality or cause

unreasonable interference through any of the following:

(a) the emission of effluent, odour, smoke, fumes, dust or other airborne pollutants

(b) noise

(c) vibration

(d) electrical interference

(e) light spill

(f) glare

(g) hours of operation

(h) traffic impacts. 2 Development should be sited and designed to minimise negative impact on existing and

potential future land uses considered appropriate in the locality. 3 Development adjacent to a Residential Zone or residential area within a Township Zone

should be designed to minimise overlooking and overshadowing of nearby residential properties.

4 Residential development adjacent to non-residential zones and land uses should be

located, designed and/or sited to protect residents from potential adverse impacts from non-residential activities.

5 Sensitive uses likely to conflict with the continuation of lawfully existing developments

and land uses considered appropriate for the zone should not be developed or should be designed to minimize negative impacts.

Noise

6 Development should be sited, designed and constructed to minimise negative impacts of

noise and to avoid unreasonable interference. 7 Development should be consistent with the relevant provisions in the current

Environment Protection (Noise) Policy.

Rural Interface

8 The potential for adverse impacts resulting from rural development should be minimised

by:

(a) not locating horticulture or intensive animal keeping on land adjacent to

townships (b) maintaining an adequate separation between horticulture or intensive animal

keeping and townships, other sensitive uses and, where desirable, other forms of primary production.

9 Traffic movement, spray drift, dust, noise, odour, and the use of frost fans and gas guns

associated with primary production activities should not lead to unreasonable impact on adjacent land users.

10 Existing primary production uses and mineral extraction should not be prejudiced by the

inappropriate encroachment of sensitive uses such as urban development. 11 Development within 300 metres of facilities for the handling, transportation and storage

of bulk commodities should:

(a) not prejudice the continued operation of those facilities

(b) be located, designed, and developed having regard to the potential environmental impact arising from the operation of such facilities and the potential extended operation of activities.

Land Division

OBJECTIVES 1 Land division that occurs in an orderly sequence allowing efficient provision of new

infrastructure and facilities and making optimum use of existing under utilised infrastructure and facilities.

2 Land division that creates allotments appropriate for the intended use.

3 Land division that is integrated with site features, including landscape and environmental features, adjacent land uses, the existing transport network and the availability of infrastructure.

4 Land division restricted in rural areas to ensure the efficient use of rural land for primary production and avoidance of uneconomic infrastructure provision.

PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL 1 When land is divided:

(a) stormwater should be capable of being drained safely and efficiently from each proposed allotment and disposed of from the land in an environmentally sensitive manner

(b) a sufficient water supply should be made available for each allotment

(c) provision should be made for the disposal of wastewater, sewage and other effluent from each allotment without risk to health

(d) proposed roads should be graded, or be capable of being graded to connect safely and conveniently with an existing road or thoroughfare.

2 Land should not be divided if any of the following apply:

(a) the size, shape, location, slope or nature of the land makes any of the allotments unsuitable for the intended use

(b) any allotment will not have a frontage to one of the following:

(i) an existing road

(ii) a proposed public road

(iii) access to a public road via an internal roadway in a plan of community division

(c) the intended use of the land is likely to require excessive cut and/or fill

(d) it is likely to lead to undue erosion of the subject land or land within the locality

(e) the wastewater treatment plant to which subsequent development will be connected does not have sufficient capacity to handle the additional wastewater volumes and pollutant loads generated by such development

(f) the area is unsewered and cannot accommodate an appropriate onsite wastewater disposal system within the allotment that complies with (or can comply with) the relevant public and environmental health legislation applying to the intended use(s)

(g) any allotments will straddle more than one zone or policy area.

Design and Layout

3 Land divisions should be designed to ensure that areas of native vegetation and wetlands:

(a) are not fragmented or reduced in size

(b) do not need to be cleared as a consequence of subsequent development.

4 The design of a land division should incorporate:

(a) roads, thoroughfares and open space that result in safe and convenient linkages with the surrounding environment, including public and community transport facilities, and which, where necessary, facilitate the satisfactory future division of land and the inter-communication with neighbouring localities

(b) safe and convenient access from each allotment to an existing or proposed public road or thoroughfare

(c) areas to provide appropriate separation distances between potentially conflicting land uses and/or zones

(d) suitable land set aside for useable local open space

(e) public utility services within road reserves and where necessary within dedicated easements

(f) the preservation of significant natural, cultural or landscape features including State and local heritage places

(g) protection for existing vegetation and drainage lines

(h) where appropriate, the amalgamation of smaller allotments to ensure coordinated and efficient site development

5 Land division should facilitate optimum solar access for energy efficiency.

6 Land division within an area identified as being an ‘Excluded Area from Bushfire Protection Planning Provisions’ as shown on Bushfire Protection Area BPA Maps - Bushfire Risk should be designed to make provisions for:

(a) emergency vehicle access through to the Bushfire Protection Area and other areas of open space connected to it

(b) a mainly continuous street pattern serving new allotments that eliminates the use of cul-de-sacs or dead end roads

(c) a fire hazard separation zone isolating residential allotments from areas that pose an unacceptable bushfire risk by containing the allotments within a perimeter road or through other means that achieve an adequate separation.

7 Allotments in the form of a battleaxe configuration should:

(a) have an allotment area consistent with that desired within the relevant zone or policy area (excluding the area of the ‘handle’ of such an allotment)

(b) provide for an access onto a public road, with the driveway ‘handle’ being not less than 6 metres in width nor more than 50 metres in length

(c) contain sufficient area on the allotment for a vehicle to turn around to enable it to egress the allotment in a forward direction

(d) not be created where it would lead to multiple access points onto a road which would dominate or adversely affect the amenity of the streetscape

(e) be avoided where their creation would be incompatible with the prevailing pattern of development.

8 Allotments should have an orientation, size and configuration to encourage development that:

(a) minimises the need for earthworks and retaining walls

(b) maintains natural drainage systems

(c) faces abutting streets and open spaces

(d) does not require the removal of native vegetation to facilitate that development

(e) will not overshadow, dominate, encroach on or otherwise detrimentally affect the setting of the surrounding locality.

9 Within defined townships and settlements where the land to be divided borders a river, lake, wetland or creek, the land adjoining the bank should become public open space and linked with an existing or proposed pedestrian or transport network.

10 Within defined townships and settlements land division should make provision for a reserve or an area of open space that is at least 25 metres wide from the top of the bank of a watercourse and that incorporates land within the 1 in 100 year average return interval flood event area.

11 The layout of a land division should keep flood-prone land free from development.

12 The arrangement of roads, allotments, reserves and open space should enable the provision of a stormwater management drainage system that:

(a) contains and retains all watercourses, drainage lines and native vegetation

(b) enhances amenity

(c) integrates with the open space system and surrounding area.

Roads and Access

13 Road reserves should be of a width and alignment that can:

(a) provide for safe and convenient movement and parking of projected volumes of vehicles and other users

(b) provide for footpaths, cycle lanes and shared-use paths for the safety and convenience of residents and visitors

(c) allow vehicles to enter or reverse from an allotment or site in a single movement allowing for a car parked on the opposite side of the street

(d) accommodate street tree planting, landscaping and street furniture

(e) accommodate the location, construction and maintenance of stormwater drainage and public utilities

(f) provide unobstructed, safe and efficient vehicular access to individual allotments and sites

(g) allow for the efficient movement of service and emergency vehicles.

14 The design of the land division should facilitate the most direct route to local facilities for pedestrians and cyclists and enable footpaths, cycle lanes and shared-use paths to be provided of a safe and suitable width and reasonable longitudinal gradient.

15 The layout of land divisions should result in roads designed and constructed to ensure:

(a) that traffic speeds and volumes are restricted where appropriate by limiting street length and/or the distance between bends and slow points

(b) there are adequate sight distances for motorists at intersections, junctions, pedestrian and cyclist crossings, and crossovers to allotments to ensure the safety of all road users and pedestrians

(c) that existing dedicated cycling and walking routes are not compromised.

16 The design of the land division should provide space sufficient for on-street visitor car parking for the number and size of allotments, taking account of:

(a) the size of proposed allotments and sites and opportunities for on-site parking

(b) the availability and frequency of public and community transport

(c) on-street parking demand likely to be generated by nearby uses.

17 The layout of land divisions should incorporate street patterns designed to enhance the efficient movement of traffic and minimise trip lengths.

Land Division in Rural Areas

18 Rural land should not be divided if the resulting allotments would be of a size and configuration likely to impede the efficient use of rural land for any of the following:

(a) primary production

(b) value adding industries related to primary production

(c) protection of natural resources.

19 Rural land should not be divided where new allotments would result in any of the following:

(a) fragmentation of productive primary production land

(b) strip development along roads or water mains

(c) prejudice against the proper and orderly development of townships

(d) removal of native vegetation for allotment boundaries, access roads, infrastructure, dwellings and other buildings or firebreaks.

OBJECTIVES 1 Retention, protection and restoration of the natural resources and environment. 2 Protection of the quality and quantity of South Australia’s surface waters, including

inland, and underground waters. 3 The ecologically sustainable use of natural resources including water resources,

including ground water, surface water and watercourses. 4 Natural hydrological systems and environmental flows reinstated, and maintained and

enhanced. 5 Development consistent with the principles of water sensitive design. 6 Development sited and designed to:

(a) protect natural ecological systems

(b) achieve the sustainable use of water

(c) protect water quality, including receiving waters

(d) reduce runoff and peak flows and prevent the risk of downstream flooding

(e) minimise demand on reticulated water supplies

(f) maximise the harvest and use of stormwater

(g) protect stormwater from pollution sources. 7 Storage and use of stormwater which avoids adverse impact on public health and safety. 8 Native flora, fauna and ecosystems protected, retained, conserved and restored. 9 Restoration, expansion and linking of existing native vegetation to facilitate habitat

corridors for ease of movement of fauna. 10 Minimal disturbance and modification of the natural landform. 11 Protection of the physical, chemical and biological quality of soil resources. 12 Protection of areas prone to erosion or other land degradation processes from

inappropriate development. 13 Protection of the scenic qualities of natural and rural landscapes. PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL 1 Development should be undertaken with minimum impact on the natural environment,

including air and water quality, land, soil, biodiversity, and scenically attractive areas. 2 Development should ensure that South Australia’s natural assets, such as biodiversity,

water and soil, are protected and enhanced. 3 Development should not significantly obstruct or adversely affect sensitive ecological

areas such as creeks and wetlands.

4 Development should be appropriate to land capability and the protection and

conservation of water resources and biodiversity.

Water Sensitive Design

5 Development should be designed to maximise conservation, minimise consumption and

encourage reuse of water resources. 6 Development should not take place if it results in unsustainable use of surface or

underground water resources. 7 Development should be sited and designed to:

(a) capture and re-use stormwater, where practical

(b) minimise surface water runoff

(c) prevent soil erosion and water pollution

(d) protect and enhance natural water flows

(e) protect water quality by providing adequate separation distances from watercourses and other water bodies

(f) not contribute to an increase in salinity levels

(g) avoid the water logging of soil or the release of toxic elements

(h) maintain natural hydrological systems and not adversely affect:

(i) the quantity and quality of groundwater

(ii) the depth and directional flow of groundwater (iii) the quality and function of natural springs.

8 Water discharged from a development site should:

(a) be of a physical, chemical and biological condition equivalent to or better than its pre-developed state

(b) not exceed the rate of discharge from the site as it existed in pre-development

conditions. 9 Development should include stormwater management systems to protect it from damage

during a minimum of a 1 in 100 year average return interval flood. 10 Development should have adequate provision to control any stormwater over-flow runoff

from the site and should be sited and designed to improve the quality of stormwater and minimise pollutant transfer to receiving waters.

11 Development should include stormwater management systems to mitigate peak flows

and manage the rate and duration of stormwater discharges from the site to ensure the carrying capacities of downstream systems are not overloaded.

12 Development should include stormwater management systems to minimise the

discharge of sediment, suspended solids, organic matter, nutrients, bacteria, litter and other contaminants to the stormwater system.

13 Stormwater management systems should preserve natural drainage systems, including the associated environmental flows.

14 Stormwater management systems should:

(a) maximise the potential for stormwater harvesting and re-use, either on-site or as close as practicable to the source

(b) utilise, but not be limited to, one or more of the following harvesting methods:

(i) the collection of roof water in tanks (ii) the discharge to open space, landscaping or garden areas, including

strips adjacent to car parks (ii) the incorporation of detention and retention facilities (iv) aquifer recharge.

15 Where it is not practicable to detain or dispose of stormwater on site, only clean

stormwater runoff should enter the public stormwater drainage system. 16 Artificial wetland systems, including detention and retention basins, should be sited and

designed to:

(a) ensure public health and safety is protected

(b) minimise potential public health risks arising from the breeding of mosquitoes.

Water Catchment Areas

17 Development should ensure watercourses and their beds, banks, wetlands and

floodplains are not damaged or modified and are retained in their natural state, except where modification is required for essential access or maintenance purposes.

18 No development should occur where its proximity to a swamp or wetland will damage or

interfere with the hydrology or water regime of the swamp or wetland. 19 A wetland or low-lying area providing habitat for native flora and fauna should not be

drained, except temporarily for essential management purposes to enhance environmental values.

20 Along watercourses, areas of remnant native vegetation, or areas prone to erosion, that

are capable of natural regeneration should be fenced off to limit stock access. 21 Development such as cropping, intensive animal keeping, residential, tourism, industry

and horticulture, that increases the amount of surface run-off should include a strip of land at least 20 metres wide measured from the top of existing banks on each side of a watercourse that is:

(a) fenced to exclude livestock (b) kept free of development, including structures, formal roadways or access

ways for machinery or any other activity causing soil compaction or significant modification of the natural surface of the land

(c) revegetated with locally indigenous vegetation comprising trees, shrubs and

other groundcover plants to filter run-off so as to reduce the impacts on native aquatic ecosystems and to minimize soil loss eroding into the watercourse.

22 Development resulting in the depositing of an object or solid material in a watercourse or

floodplain or the removal of bank and bed material should not:

(a) adversely affect the migration of aquatic biota

(b) adversely affect the natural flow regime

(c) cause or contribute to water pollution

(d) result in watercourse or bank erosion

(e) adversely affect native vegetation upstream or downstream that is growing in or adjacent to a watercourse.

23 The location and construction of dams, water tanks and diversion drains should:

(a) occur off watercourse (b) not take place in ecologically sensitive areas or on erosion-prone sites (c) provide for low flow by-pass mechanisms to allow for migration of aquatic biota (d) not negatively affect downstream users (e) minimise in-stream or riparian vegetation loss (f) incorporate features to improve water quality (eg wetlands and floodplain ecological communities) (g) protect ecosystems dependent on water resources.

24 Irrigated horticulture and pasture should not increase groundwater-induced salinity. 25 Development should comply with the current Environment Protection (Water Quality)

Policy.

Biodiversity and Native Vegetation

26 Development should retain existing areas of native vegetation and where possible

contribute to revegetation using locally indigenous plant species. 27 Development should be designed and sited to minimise the loss and disturbance of

native flora and fauna.

28 The provision of services, including power, water, effluent and waste disposal, access roads and tracks should be sited on areas already cleared of native vegetation.

29 Native vegetation should be conserved and its conservation value and function not

compromised by development if the native vegetation does any of the following:

(a) provides an important habitat for wildlife or shade and shelter for livestock

(b) has a high plant species diversity or includes rare, vulnerable or endangered plant species or plant associations and communities

(c) provides an important seed bank for locally indigenous vegetation (d) has high amenity value and/or significantly contributes to the landscape quality

of an area, including the screening of buildings and unsightly views

(e) has high value as a remnant of vegetation associations characteristic of a

district or region prior to extensive clearance for agriculture (f) is growing in, or is characteristically associated with a wetland environment.

30 Native vegetation should not be cleared if such clearing is likely to lead to, cause or

exacerbate any of the following:

(a) erosion or sediment within water catchments

(b) decreased soil stability

(c) soil or land slip

(d) deterioration in the quality of water in a watercourse or surface water runoff

(e) a local or regional salinity problem

(f) the occurrence or intensity of local or regional flooding. 31 Development that proposes the clearance of native vegetation should address or

consider the implications that removing the native vegetation will have on the following:

(a) provision for linkages and wildlife corridors between significant areas of native

vegetation

(b) erosion along watercourses and the filtering of suspended solids and nutrients from run-off

(c) the amenity of the locality

(d) bushfire safety

(e) the net loss of native vegetation and other biodiversity.

32 Where native vegetation is to be removed, it should be replaced in a suitable location on

the site with locally indigenous vegetation to ensure that there is not a net loss of native vegetation and biodiversity.

33 Development should be located and occur in a manner which:

(a) does not increase the potential for, or result in, the spread of pest plants, or the spread of any nonindigenous plants into areas of native vegetation or a conservation zone

(b) avoids the degradation of remnant native vegetation by any other means

including as a result of spray drift, compaction of soil, modification of surface water flows, pollution to groundwater or surface water or change to groundwater levels

(c) incorporates a separation distance and/or buffer area to protect wildlife habitats

and other features of nature conservation significance. 34 Development should promote the long-term conservation of vegetation by:

(a) avoiding substantial structures, excavations, and filling of land in close proximity to the trunk of trees and beneath their canopies

(b) minimising impervious surfaces beneath the canopies of trees (c) taking other effective and reasonable precautions to protect both vegetation

and the integrity of structures and essential services. 35 Horticulture involving the growing of olives should be located at least:

(a) 500 metres from:

(i) a national park (ii) a conservation park

(iii) a wilderness protection area

(iv) the edge of a substantially intact stratum of native vegetation greater

than 5 hectares in area

(b) 50 metres from the edge of stands of native vegetation 5 hectares or less in area.

36 Horticulture involving the growing of olives should have at least one locally indigenous

tree that will grow to a height of at least 7 metres sited at least every 100 metres around the perimeter of the orchard.

Soil Conservation

37 Development should not have an adverse impact on the natural, physical, chemical or

biological quality and characteristics of soil resources. 38 Development should be designed and sited to prevent erosion. 39 Development should take place in a manner that will minimise alteration to the existing

landform. 40 Development should minimise the loss of soil from a site through soil erosion or siltation

during the construction phase of any development and following the commencement of an activity.

ATTACHMENT B

Township Zone The Objectives and Principles of Development Control that follow apply to the Township Zone shown on Maps Baro/42 and 43. They are additional to those expressed for the whole of the Council area. OBJECTIVES Objective 1 Services and facilities grouped together to meet the needs of the local

community and the visiting public. Objective 2 Residential development consistent with maintaining a small country township

character. Objective 3 Conservation and enhancement of the main road streetscape and scenic rural

setting of the township. Objective 4 Retention of the function of Mount Pleasant primarily as a local service centre. Objective 5 Development that contributes to the desired character of the zone. DESIRED CHARACTER Controlled and orderly development, restricted to defined township boundaries assists in the economic provision of public services, the creation of a pleasant living environment, and the retention of surrounding rural areas primarily for agriculture, recreation, and water and nature conservation. Development within the Township Zone will continue to provide a range of small-scale land uses to serve the day-to-day needs of the local population. Development for substantial retail, commercial or industrial purposes is not appropriate within this zone. Non-residential uses will be focussed within the main street of the township, where possible. The township has established a grid pattern of roads, with occasional variation as a result of more recent development within the township. It is envisaged that new development reflects the grid pattern found within the township rather than building on, or establishing a curvilinear street pattern with culs-de-sac. Development will maintain the attractive visual amenity of the approaches to the township. The existing character, as derived from the small-scale and residential style of buildings and pleasant open rural surrounds, will be retained. Rural activities compatible with residential uses are appropriate where they maintain the existing semi-rural character. Dwellings within the township are of a relatively low density typical of country settlements. It is expected that development will maintain the overall low scale, low density character with dwellings principally limited to single storey form, although two storey dwellings incorporating a floor level within the roof space may be appropriate. Development will reflect the prevailing generous front, side and rear boundary setbacks. It is expected that the pleasant appearance of land as derived from the existing watercourses and associated vegetation will be maintained. Development will result in the establishment of additional landscaping and vegetation where possible, as well as, retain existing vegetation, whether native or non-native, that makes a positive contribution to the character and amenity. Vistas to the open landscape surrounding the township are also important and development will seek to maintain these vistas. A range of ‘traditional’ verge treatments (front boundary, footpath, street trees and gutter) and ‘informal’ verge treatments (no kerbing, gutter and undeveloped verges) exist between and

within townships. It is envisaged that development, particularly where involving a rearrangement of allotments or access points, will continue the relevant pattern of road verge predominant with that part of the township, particularly within the main street of the township. Mount Pleasant The township of Mount Pleasant is currently linear in form. While infill development within the existing township boundary is encouraged, the desire to maintain the low density character of Mount Pleasant requires additional land to meet the demands of future populations. Development of land located along the eastern fringe of the township for residential purposes is appropriate while development of land for employment purposes is envisaged in certain locations. All development will have regard to the environmental qualities of the surrounding area and in particular the water catchment function of the Mount Lofty Ranges Watershed. In addition to the Desired Character statement specific to the township, portions of the Township Zone covering Mount Pleasant are also covered by the Historic (Conservation) Policy Area. The objectives and principles that apply to the Historic (Conservation) Policy Area are additional to those expressed for the whole of the Council area and for the Township Zone.

PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL

Land Use

1 The following forms of development are envisaged in the zone:

• community facilities

• domestic outbuilding in association with a dwelling

• domestic structure

• dwelling

• dwelling addition

• educational establishment

• open space

• recreation area

• shops where the gross leasable area is less than 250 square metres

• small-scale commercial development

• small scale light and service industry development

• small-scale tourist development

• supported accommodation. 2 Development listed as non-complying is generally inappropriate. 3 Residential development should be mainly in the form of low-density detached dwellings,

with a limited range of increased density development. 4 Business and commercial development should be of a scale and function consistent with

the role of the township as a local service centre supplying a range of goods and services to the local community, the surrounding district and visitors to the area.

5 Industry uses should be restricted to light and service industry activities that provide

small-scale facilities to the community or are agriculturally based industries that process local produce.

Form and Character

6 Development should not be undertaken unless it is consistent with the desired character

for the zone.

7 Development of a business, commercial or industrial nature should be consolidated with existing facilities to establish an identifiable service centre.

Land Division

8 Allotments in Mount Pleasant should have sufficient area to accommodate appropriate

development and satisfactory waste disposal that will not cause or contribute to pollution of the River Torrens/Karrawirra Parri or the metropolitan water supply.

9 Other than within Residential Policy Area 41 and Mixed Use Policy Area 42 land division should create allotments with a minimum site area of not less than 1200 square metres unless associated with retirement, aged-care or affordable housing.

ATTACHMENT C

Residential Policy Area 41 – Mount

Pleasant The Objectives and Principles of Development Control that follow apply to the Residential Policy Area 41 shown on Maps Baro/63 and Baro/68. They are additional to those expressed for the Township Zone and the whole of the Council area.

OBJECTIVES

Objective 1 A policy area primarily for low-density residential development. Objective 2 A policy area comprising a range of dwelling types, including a minimum of15

per cent affordable housing. Objective 3 Development that contributes to the desired character of the policy area.

DESIRED CHARACTER

It is expected that development will be primarily for residential purposes at low densities consistent with the maintenance of a small country township character. It is envisaged that development will maintain and enhance existing residential amenity and enhance gateway entrances into the township. Natural or cultural features, such as stands of trees and watercourses will be retained by, and incorporated into, development. While access into residential areas will be limited, dwellings are envisaged to front gateway entrances to enhance the township character of Mount Pleasant. Residential development of the land at the northern end of the township will retain the significant grouping of trees along Angaston-Birdwood Road and provide an appropriate buffer to existing non-residential development. Residential development at the southern end of the township will retain the stand of trees along Mount Pleasant-Tungkillo Road and the watercourse. The predominant form of housing will be single storey detached dwellings at low densities, however, other forms of housing at a range of densities are also envisaged, such as semi-detached, row dwellings and aged persons accommodation to achieve affordable housing outcomes. Non-residential development within the Policy Area will only occur where its operation, scale, design and appearance will not be detrimental to the amenity of surrounding residential land uses.


Land Use 1 The following forms of development are envisaged in the policy area:

• carport

• detached dwelling

• semi-detached dwelling

• row dwelling

• domestic outbuilding in association with a dwelling

• dwelling addition

• pergola

• verandah

• retirement village Form and Character 2 Development should not be undertaken unless it is consistent with the desired character

for the policy area. 3 Residential development should accord to Concept Plan (Figure T/1). 4 Dwellings should be designed within the following parameters:

Parameter Value

Minimum setback from primary road frontage 8 metres

Minimum setback from secondary road frontage 3 metres

Minimum setback from side boundaries 2.5 metres

Minimum setback from rear boundary 6 metres

Minimum number of on site car parking spaces

(one of which should be covered)

2 spaces for dwellings with up to 2 bedrooms;

3 spaces for dwellings with 3 or more bedrooms.

unless involving the construction of semi-detached dwellings, row dwellings, accommodation associated with retirement villages and/or affordable housing. 5 Development for non-residential purposes should only be undertaken where:

(a) the proposed activity is not liable to detract from the residential character and amenity of the policy area;

(b) the design and appearance of the buildings are in keeping with the scale of residential development;

(c) adequate off street car parking is provided; and (d) landscaping is provided to maintain the continuity of residential streetscapes and

provide visual buffers. 6 Sheds, garages and similar outbuildings should be designed within the following

parameters:

Parameter Value

Maximum floor area 100 square metres

Maximum wall height (from natural ground level) 3 metres

Minimum setback from side and rear boundaries 0.6 metres for wall heights up to 2.7 metres; 1.5 metres for wall heights over 2.7 metres

Minimum setback from a public road or public open space area

No closer than any building on the site, or adjacent site

Affordable Housing 7 Development should include a minimum 15 per cent of residential dwellings for affordable housing. 8 Affordable housing should be distributed throughout the policy area to avoid over concentration of similar types of housing in a particular area. Land Division 9 Allotments should vary in size and be suitable to facilitate a range of housing forms

consistent with the objectives and desired character of the policy area, and should generally be not less than 800 square metres in area and have a frontage of no less than 15 metres unless:

ATTACHMENT D

(a) for the purposes of retirement or aged persons accommodation; or (b) for the purposes of affordable housing; or (c) located directly opposite existing or proposed public open space; or (d) not directly visible to existing township approach roads including the Mount

Pleasant-Sanderston Road, Mount Pleasant-Springton Road, Melrose Street and the Mount Pleasant-Tungkillo Road.

Mixed Use Policy Area 42 The Objectives and Principles of Development Control that follow apply to the Mixed Use Policy Area 42 shown on Map Baro/68. They are additional to those expressed for the Township Zone and the whole of the Council area.

OBJECTIVES

Objective 1 A policy area that provides for health, education, community, and related

activities to serve the population of the town, the surrounding area and visitors.

Objective 2 Limited residential development in suitable locations. Objective 3 Development that contributes to the desired character of the policy area.

DESIRED CHARACTER

The Policy Area envisages a potential future hospital expansion and school expansion to support future local and regional populations whilst encouraging an associated range of health, educational and community activities including, but not limited to, high–level care, consulting rooms and community support services. Retail, commercial and industrial development is not desired in the Policy Area. Buildings and structures in the Policy Area will be low in scale and single storey unless associated with the hospital where two-storey development may be contemplated. Buildings and structures in the Policy Area will not compromise the local heritage significance of the school. Residential development in the Policy Area will be limited to high-level care accommodation in close proximity to the hospital and retirement housing.

Land Use 1 The following forms of development are envisaged in the policy area:

• Hospital

• Educational establishment

• Community support services

• Nursing home

• Consulting rooms

Form and Character

2 Development should not be undertaken unless it is consistent with the desired character

for the policy area. 3 Development should accord with Concept Plan Figure T/1. 4 Development to the rear of the existing hospital and school should comprise health,

education and community related activities and residential development limited to high-level care accommodation and retirement housing.

5 Buildings and structures on land fronting Chibnalls Road should have a total floor area

not exceeding 500m2.

6 Development should be setback no less than 8m from Chibnalls Road. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Complying Development Complying developments are prescribed in Schedule 4 of the Development Regulations 2008. Non-complying Development Development (including building work, a change in the use of land, or division of an allotment) for the following is non-complying:

Form of Development Exceptions

Agistment and holding of stock

Consulting room Within Mixed Use Policy Area 42

Crematorium

Dairy

Demolition of any building or structure listed in Table Baro/11 - State Heritage Places

Farming

Farm building

Fuel depot

General Industry

Horse keeping

Horticulture

Intensive animal keeping

Light Industry

Motel

Motor repair station

Nursing home Within Residential Policy Area 41 and Mixed Use Policy Area 42.

Office Except where ancillary to an existing lawful business.

Retail showroom

Residential flat building Other than for the purposes of a retirement village

Road transport terminal

Service Industry

Service trade premises

Shop or group of shops Special Industry

Stock sales yard

Stock slaughter works

Store

Telecommunications facility

Warehouse

Waste reception, storage, treatment or disposal

Wrecking yard

Public Notification Categories of public notification are prescribed in Schedule 9 of the Development Regulations 2008. Further, the following forms of development are designated Category 1 within Mixed Use Policy Area 42:

Community support services Consulting rooms Educational establishment Group dwelling for the purposes of a retirement village Hospital Nursing home Residential flat building for the purposes of a retirement village Retirement village

Residential Policy Area

Potential School / Hospital Expansion and Health / Education / High-level care

Vegetation buffer

Detention basin

Vehicular access

Traffic management point

Deferred Urban

THE BAROSSA COUNCIL

1000metres 0

Scale 1:20000

MOUNT PLEASANTCONCEPT PLAN

Figure T/1

R

MELROSE

STREET

MELROSE

STREET

MELR

OSE

STREET

MELR

OSE

STREET

JOHNS

ROAD

JOHNS

ROAD

TALUNGA PARK ROAD

TALUNGA PARK ROAD

GLE

N D

EV

ON

RO

AD

GLE

N D

EV

ON

RO

AD

RAILWAY TCE

RAILWAY TCE

WILLIAM ST

WILLIAM ST

ISAAC ST

ISAAC ST

KEN

HIC

KS

ROAD

KEN

HIC

KS

ROAD

ANG

ASTON

- BIR

DWO

OD

RO

AD

ANG

ASTON

- BIR

DWO

OD

RO

AD

SHOW

GRO

UND

R

D

SHOW

GRO

UND

R

D

HOSPIT

AL

RD

HOSPIT

AL

RD

MT PLEASANT -

MT PLEASANT -

McGORM

ANS ROAD

McGORM

ANS ROAD

SANDERSTON ROADSANDERSTON ROAD

41

41

41

41

ATTACHMENT E

Deferred Urban Zone

The Objectives and Principles of Development Control that follow apply to the Deferred Urban Zone shown on Maps Baro/42 and Baro/43. They are additional to those expressed for the whole of the Council area.

OBJECTIVES

1 A zone accommodating a restricted range of rural uses that are not prejudicial to development of the land for urban purposes and maintain the rural appearance of the zone

2 A zone comprising land to be used primarily for broad-acre cropping and grazing purposes until required for future urban expansion.

3 Prevention of development likely to be incompatible with long-term urban development, or likely to be detrimental to the orderly and efficient servicing and conversion of the land for urban use.


Land Use

1 The following forms of development are envisaged in the zone:

▪ broad-acre cropping ▪ grazing.

2 Development listed as non-complying is generally inappropriate.

3 Development should not be undertaken if it will be prejudicial to the orderly and economic development of future urban land uses within the zone.

Land Division

4 Land division should not occur unless it is in the form of an alteration to the boundaries of an allotment and no additional allotments are created in the zone.

5 The alteration of allotment boundaries should only occur in order to achieve one or more of the following:

(a) correct an anomaly in the placement of allotment boundaries with respect to the location of existing buildings or structures

(b) improve the management of the land for the purpose of primary production

(c) enable the provision of public infrastructure.

PROCEDURAL MATTERS

Complying Development

Complying developments are prescribed in Schedule 4 of the Development Regulations 2008.

Non-complying Development

Development (including building work, a change in the use of land, or division of an allotment) for the following is non-complying: Form of development Exceptions Advertisement and/or advertising hoarding

Amusement machine centre Commercial forestry Community centre Consulting room Crematorium Dairy Dwelling Except a detached dwelling that does not result in more than

one dwelling on an allotment. Educational establishment Fuel depot Hospital Hotel Indoor recreation centre Industry Intensive animal keeping Land division Except where no additional allotments are created partly or

wholly within the zone. Motel Motor repair station Nursing home Office Petrol filling station Place of worship Pre-school Prescribed mining operations Residential flat building Road transport terminal Service trade premises Shop Stock sales yard Stock slaughter works Store Tourist accommodation Warehouse Waste reception, storage, treatment or disposal

Wrecking yard

Public Notification

Categories of public notification are prescribed in Schedule 9 of the Development Regulations 2008.

ATTACHMENT F

THE BAROSSA COUNCILMOUNT PLEASANTSTRUCTURE PLAN

MAP Baro/1 (Overlay 1)ENLARGEMENT J

Living

Mixed Use

Deferred Urban

Neighbourhood Centre

Education - Primary

Hospital

Community Use

Effluent Lagoons

Recreation

Open Space

Watercourse

Major Local Road

Secondary Arterial Road

Ep

H

Cu

EL

NCe

0 metres 200 400 600 800 1000

Rec

Rec

Rec

WILLIAMSTOW

N ROAD

To Birdwood

To S

pring

ton

MELROSE

MELROSE

MELROSE

STREETSTREETSTREET

MO

UN

T PLEASANT - TU

NG

KILLO R

OAD

SALEYARD ROAD

TALLNGA PARK

ROAD

NCe Ep

H

Cu

EL Rec

ATTACHMENT G

LY ND OCHVALLEY RD

WARREN RD

FORRES TO

NRD

BA ROSSA V A LL EYHW

Y

BETHANY RD

PRES

SER

RD

ANGASTONR D

MOUN

T PLE

ASAN

T -KE

YNET

ONRD

MOUNT PLEASANT - S A NDERSTON RD

EDEN

VAL LEY

RDSW ANR E ACH

RD

TRUR

O R

D

KEYNETON RD

LIGHT

PASS

RD

MT.CR AWFORDRD

CR IC KS MILL

RD

SOU

THPA

RARD

WILLIAMSTOWNRD

STURT HWY

MAPBaro/24

MAPBaro/28

MAPBaro/27

MAPBaro/26

MAPBaro/31

MAPBaro/25

MAPBaro/32

MAPBaro/34

MAPBaro/36

MAPBaro/33

MAPBaro 8

MAPBaro 10MAPBaro 11

MAPBaro 22

MAPBaro 21

MAPBaro 12

MAPBaro 17

MAPBaro/3

MAPBaro/3

MAPBaro/3

MAPBaro/3

MAPBaro/30

MAPBaro/35

MAPBaro/29

MAPBaro 7

MAPBaro 5

MAPBaro 6

MAPBaro/4

MAPBaro 23

MAPBaro 13MAPBaro 16

MAPBaro 15

MAPBaro 14

MAPBaro 18

MAPBaro 19

MAPBaro/20

SANDYCREEK

WILLIAMSTOWN

ROWLAND FLAT

LYNDOCH

MT PLEASANT

Baro9

For the purposes of the Development Plan unless otherwise clearlyindicated, the zone/policy area boundaries depicted on or intended to befixed by Maps Baro/3 to Baro/68 inclusive shall be read as conforming in allrespects (as the case may require) to the sectional or subdivisional boundaries,to the centre line of roads or drain reserves or to the title boundaries, or toimaginary straight lines joining the positions defined by survey or by themeasurements shown on the said maps against which the said zone/policyarea boundaries are shown or otherwise as indicated.

Development Plan Boundary

THE BAROSSA COUNCIL

10km0

Scale 1:225000

INDEXMAP Baro/2

ATTACHMENT H

W

W

Ru1(OW)

Ru1(OW)

W

HICKS RD

CHAPELS RD

SMITH RD

MCLEAN RD

TAPSCOTTS RD

VERA

LLS

RD

PROMMS RD

MOUN

T PLE

ASAN

T -KE

YNET

ONRD

ROSS RD

NOTE: Schedule 2 Mount Lofty RangesWatershed Boundary according toGazette 22 August 1996 Pages728 to 732 Regulations underWaterworks act 1932

NOTE: Schedule 2 Mount Lofty RangesWatershed Boundary according toGazette 22 August 1996 Pages728 to 732 Regulations underWaterworks act 1932

ADELAIDE HILLSCOUNCIL

THE MID

MURRAY C

OUNCIL

428

430

431

1835

427

1835

432

426424

418

433

421

425463

4224347067

171

7066

172

452

170

7082

177

169173

6432631

7002

7010

138

139400

70171628

480

1629

16277037

1631 7021

703570221630408

112

405

423

7025111

101

7024

7026

409

383

102

7056415

6414

7063

7053

12897052

1286

7071

6302

7072

130062926293

6285

6290

6286 6291

BIRDWOOD - MOUNT PLE

AS ANT RD

MELROSE ST

TUNGKILLO RD

TUNGKILLO

RD

BURNS RD

GLEN DEVON RD

MOUN

MUNR

O R

D

McGORMANS RD

McGO

RMAN

S R

D

HARDINGS RD

HOAD

RAN

GE R

D

VERR

MAP Baro/34 ADJOINSM

AP

Bar

o/3

AD

JOIN

SM

AP B

aro/3 AD

JOIN

S

MT PLEASANT

See MAP Baro/42

See MAP Baro/43

Ru1(OW) W

Rural 1 (Outside Watershed) Watershed

Zone BoundaryDevelopment Plan Boundary

THE BAROSSA COUNCIL

2km0

Scale 1:40000

ZONESMAP Baro/36

ATTACHMENT I

7024

BIRDWOOD - MOUNT PLEASANT R

D

TUNGKILLO RD

WILLIAMSTOWN RD

HERR

IOT

RD

McGORMANS RD

TALUNGA PARK RD

CHURCH ST

ISAAC ST

RAILWAY TCE RAILWAY TCE

SALEYARD R

SHOWGROUND RD

WILLIAM ST

W

R(W)

RecR(W)

Rec

NCe

R(W)

W

McLEAN R

D

HICKS RD

GLEN DEVON RD

MELROSE ST

MELROSE S

T

Boundary 60m fromcentre-line of River

Boundary 60m fromcentre-line of River

T

T

DU

DU

MAP Baro/36 ADJOINS

MAP Baro/36 ADJOINS

MA

P B

aro/

36 A

DJO

INS

MA

P Baro/43 A

DJO

INS

MT PLEASANTNOTE: For Policy Areas see MAP Baro/63.


THE BAROSSA COUNCIL

500metres0

Scale 1:10000

ZONESMAP Baro/42

NCe R(W) Rec T

Neighbourhood Centre DU Deferred Urban

Residential (Watershed) Recreation Township

W Watershed

ATTACHMENT J

7056

414

MOUNT PLE

ASANT - KEYNETO

N RD

MOUNT PLEASANT - SANDERSTON RD


PHILLIS S

T

SALEYARD RD

SHOWGROUND RD

Ru1(OW)

R(W)

Rec

W

W

W

R(W)

NCeE ST

MELROSE

ST

140m

T

DU

DU

T

MA

P B

aro/

42 A

DJO

INS

MAP Baro/36 ADJOINS

MAP Baro/36 ADJOINS

MA

P Baro/36 A

DJO

INS

MT PLEASANTNOTE: For Policy Areas see MAP Baro/63 & 68


THE BAROSSA COUNCIL

500metres0

Scale 1:10000

ZONESMAP Baro/43

NCe R(W) Rec Ru1(OW) T

Neighbourhood Centre DU Deferred Urban

Residential (Watershed) Recreation Rural 1 (Outside Watershed) Township

W Watershed

ATTACHMENT K

7056

MELROSE S

T

MELROSE ST

MOUNT PLE

ASANT - KEYNETO

N RD

MOUNT PLEASANT - SANDERSTON

TUNGKILLO RD

GLEN DEVON RD

HERR

IOT

RD

Mc

McGORMANS RD

TALUNGA PARK RD

CHURCH ST

GILES THORPE CRES

HOCKNULL PL

JOSEPH ST

MEMORIAL AVE

PENTLOE'S RD

PHILLIS S

T

SALEYARD RD

SHOWGROUND RD

WILLIAM ST

28

28

41

41

41

42

MAP Baro/68 ADJOINSM

AP B

aro/68 AD

JOIN

S

NOTE: For Zones see MAPS Baro/42 & 43.MT PLEASANT

28 Mt Pleasant Historic (Conservation) Policy Area

Policy Area BoundaryDevelopment Plan Boundary

THE BAROSSA COUNCIL

500metres0

Scale 1:7500

POLICY AREASMAP Baro/63

41 Residential Policy Area 42 Mixed Use Policy Area

ATTACHMENT L

7056

414

MOUNT PLE

ASANT - KEYNETO

N RD



PHILLIS S

T

SALEYARD RD

SHOWGROUND RD

E ST

41

42

28

MA

P B

aro/

63 A

DJO

INS

MT PLEASANT NOTE: For Zones see MAP Baro/43.

41 42

28 Residential Policy Area Mixed Use Policy Area

Mt Pleasant Historic (Conservation) Policy Area

Policy Area BoundaryDevelopment Plan Boundary

THE BAROSSA COUNCIL

500metres0

Scale 1:10000

POLICY AREASMAP Baro/68

The Barossa Council

Mount Pleasant Residential and Employment Area Development Plan Amendment

Summary of Consultation and Proposed Amendments (SCPA) Report

28 July 2010


Table of Contents

iii

Table of Contents

Introduction.........................................................................................................................................................1 Consultation........................................................................................................................................................1

Consultation Process ....................................................................................................................................1 Public Notification..........................................................................................................................................1

Public and Agency Submissions ........................................................................................................................1 Public Submissions .......................................................................................................................................1 Agency Submissions .....................................................................................................................................2 Review of Submissions and Public Meeting .................................................................................................2

Additional Matters and Investigations.................................................................................................................2 Timeframe Report...............................................................................................................................................4 CEO’s Certification .............................................................................................................................................4 Summary of Recommended Changes to the Amendment following Consultation ............................................4

Attachments Attachment A Summary of Response to Public Submissions Attachment B Summary of Response to Public Meeting Submissions Attachment C Timeframe Report Attachment D Schedule 4A Certificate Attachment E Schedule 4B Certificate


SCPA Report

1

Introduction This report is provided in accordance with Section 25(13) of the Development Act 1993 to identify matters raised during the consultation period and any recommended alterations to the amendment. The report also provides details of the consultation process undertaken by Council. The SCPA Report should be read in conjunction with the consultation version of the DPA. Where relevant, any new matters arising from the consultation process are contained in this Report. The Amendment reflects the recommendations of Council contained in this Report.

Consultation Consultation Process Statutory consultation with agencies and the public was undertaken in accordance with DPA process A and in accordance with Section 25(6) of the Development Act 1993; Regulations 10 and 11 of the Development Regulations 2008; and the agreed Statement of Intent. The consultation period ran from 11 March 2010 to 7 May 2010. The following Local Member(s) of Parliament were consulted on the DPA: (a) Tony Piccolo, Member for Light (b) Mark Goldsworthy, Member for Kavel (c) Ivan Venning, Member for Schubert An information sheet and covering letter was sent to all land owners directly affected by the DPA and to owners of adjacent land. Public Notification Notices were published as follows: – the ‘The Advertiser’ on Thursday 11 March 2010 – the Government Gazette on Thursday 11 March 2010 – the ‘Leader’ newspaper on Wednesday 10 March 2010 – the ‘Herald’ newspaper on Wednesday 10 March 2010 The DPA documents were also on display at Council’s service centres and libraries and were made available for downloading from Council’s website. A copy of the DPA was forwarded to the Department of Planning and Local Government on 10 March 2010. An information session was held at Mount Pleasant on 19 April 2010 with more than 120 people attending.

Public and Agency Submissions Public Submissions 45 written public submissions were received. Key issues raised in the submissions are summarised as follows:

The Barossa Council Mount Pleasant Residential and Employment Area Development Plan Amendment SCPA Report

a) Urban form (further extension of township in a linear manner/ribbon development) b) Suitability of selected areas for development c) Rezoning of existing light industrial land for residential development and associated loss of

employment opportunities d) Minimum lot size of 500 m2 and ability to create lots less than 500 m2 in certain cases e) Impact on township character and amenity f) Infrastructure capacity and augmentation g) Impact of additional population on roads and community services h) Support for opportunities for hospital and school to expand i) Concern about placing commercial and industrial activities on Chibnalls Road and adjacent to

possible future expanded hospital and school j) Impacts on water quality and native vegetation

A report on each submission (summary, comments, and action taken in response to each submission) is included in Attachment A. Agency Submissions 12 responses were received from agencies. Key issues raised in the responses are summarised as follows:

a) Infrastructure capacity (and augmentation) b) Watershed impacts and mitigation c) Natural resource management impacts

Review of Submissions and Public Meeting Copies of all submissions and agency comments were made available for public review from 10 May 2010 to 24 May 2010 on the Council website and at the Council offices. 22 submitters requested to be heard, and therefore a public meeting was held on 24 May 2010 where the 22 submittors plus two additional persons made verbal submissions. A copy of the proceedings and a summary of verbal submissions made at the public meeting are included in Attachment B. The Mount Pleasant Residential and Employment Area DPA Committee (appointed by Council pursuant to Section 25(11)(c) of the Development Act 1993) met on 12 July 2010 to review all submissions and agency comments and to provide advice to Council. At its meeting on 20 July 2010 Council received the advice of the Committee in respect of each submission and agency comment.

Additional Matters and Investigations The Mount Pleasant Residential and Employment Area DPA Committee met on 12 July 2010 to review all submissions and to provide advice to Council in accordance with relevant legislative requirements. In addition to the advice contained in the summary of submissions contain in Attachment A, the Committee provided the following advice to Council: “That Council continue with the Mount Pleasant Residential and Employment Area DPA with amendments as proposed by staff, with the exception that Parcel 10 be included within the Township Zone; that Parcel 12 be removed from the Township Zone and included in the Deferred Urban Zone; and that prior to a decision being made on the DPA, Council be provided with further information about employment opportunities that would remain within the township after the DPA is implemented.” The following information provided to Council explained the rationale behind the Committee’s advice and contains the requested additional information sought by the Committee: A: Zoning of Parcels 10 and 12


SCPA Report

3

The Committee noted community concerns about extending the footprint of the town in the North (Parcel 1) and South (Parcels 11 and 12) and potential alternative infill development opportunities closer to the town centre and other services and facilities. The Committee recognised that as Parcel 1 is already within the town boundary it does not increase the town’s footprint and that residential development of that parcel is the only likely catalyst for future infrastructure upgrade, while also presenting a better gateway entrance to the town than industrial development. In respect to extension of the town boundary in the South the Committee believed Tungkillo Road represents an appropriate boundary for initial development, with any development of land on the southern side of that road occurring in the longer term with detailed consideration of the interface with adjoining rural land being made at that stage. Accordingly, the Committee saw merit in Parcel 12 being included in the Deferred Urban Zone. The Committee recognised Parcel 10 does represent an appropriate opportunity for infill development based on the proximity of the land to the town centre, school, hospital and other services; the presence of sealed roads on each boundary; and the absence of significant site constraints, and therefore believed inclusion of Parcel 10 within the Township Zone is justifiable. The above described changes creates an additional development opportunity in that an additional land owner will be able to ‘enter the market’; however a review of development potential of Parcels 10 and 12 shows similar lot yields of approx 30 lots (based on 800 m2 lot size) which represents around 1.5 years supply (based on a take up rate of 20 lots per annum). Therefore the changes will not rezone more land than is necessary in order to meet the 15-20 year land supply ‘bank’ sought by the 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide. Inclusion of an additional parcel also provides opportunity to provide a choice for people seeking to live in Mount Pleasant with residential development on Parcels 1, 10 and 11 likely to cater for different markets. B. Employment opportunities The Committee noted community concerns about the rezoning of the existing light industrial land in Parcel 1 and a perceived loss of employment opportunities for any future residents. The Committee also expressed its own concerns about the impact of rezoning Parcel 1 and the proposal to exclude commercial and industrial activities from the proposed mixed use policy area in Parcels 5 and 6. The Committee therefore requested additional information about the impact of these changes. The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide sets a population/job ratio of approx 2/1 – that is one additional job for every additional two people. Based on the proposed increase in lot size and the areas for residential development, the population of Mount Pleasant may increase by approx 775 persons over the next 20 years equating to a demand for approx. 388 additional jobs. The proposed changes to the mixed use policy area are intended to further strengthen and revitalise existing local and regional employment opportunities within the health, education and community sectors and allied services, with the range of uses envisaged in the policy area carefully selected to build on the existing health and education facilities in the township and providing opportunity for a more diverse range of local employment opportunities than the current light industrial land and original draft policies for the policy area. It is further considered that the presence of the existing health and education facilities may attract a range of ancillary health, education and community related businesses such as consulting rooms, learning centres, community centres, child care etc which will further diversify the future workforce profile and create opportunities which currently do not exist in the light industrial area. Less than a quarter of the town centre area is currently dedicated to retail, commercial, industrial or community land uses with the remainder currently being used for non-neighbourhood centre related uses, mainly residential. Sufficient capacity therefore exists to provide additional retail, commercial, industrial or community facilities and services if and when the need arises, with estimates showing that around 14,800 m2 of floor space could be provided, generating up to 520 additional jobs if the area was fully developed


(based on 3.5 employees/100 m2). Existing zoning within the area allows the abovementioned uses on merit. Additional future capacity for employment opportunities currently exists and will remain within the surrounding rural area (watershed zone) in the form of agricultural industry, primary production, horticulture and the like. Overall it is considered that residential rezoning of Parcel 1 and the proposed refocus of the mixed use policy area will not prejudice future employment opportunities for Mount Pleasant.

Timeframe Report A summary of the timeframe of the DPA process relative to the agreed Statement of Intent timetable is located at Attachment C. Delays occurred because:

(a) Issues with modules in the Better Development Plan Policy Library and their suitability to The Barossa Council area, in particular policies for the valley floor and specialist industrial areas

(b) Need to prepare new Policy Library modules that were appropriate to The Barossa Council

CEO’s Certification The consultation process has been conducted and the final amendment prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Act and Regulations as confirmed by the CEO’s Certifications provided in Attachment D (Schedule 4A Certificate) and Attachment E (Schedule 4B Certificate).

Summary of Recommended Changes to the Amendment following Consultation The following is a summary of the changes recommended to the Amendment following consultation, in response to public submissions and/or agency comments, and other changes required to reflect the latest consolidated Development Plan and policies proposed in the BDP and General DPA: In the Amendment: 1. In the introductory text after the name of the DPA, delete “the Barossa Development Plan” and replace

with “The Barossa Council Development Plan” and delete “26 March 2009” and replace with “29 April 2010” and ipdate all PDC references to reflect those in the Development Plan, Consolidated Version 29 April 2010

2. Delete Amendment Instruction 87 and 95 and renumber remaining instructions accordingly 3. Amend instructions to:

(a) ensure entire PDCs are deleted and not only parts (refer annotated Amendment for details) (b) reorder objectives and PDCs to appear together under their respective headings (c) ensure various redundant headings, discussion text, design techniques and notes are removed

(refer annotated Amendment for details) (d) identify consequential referencing changes to various zones and a policy area as a result of the

change to Map Baro/63 and insertion of new Map Baro/67.


SCPA Report

5

4. In Attachment A, Hazards, PDC 2, delete “the Overlay Maps – Development Constraints and Concept Plan Map Baro/2 and Concept Plan Map Baro/7” and replace with “Figures Baro/4 and Baro/5”

5. In Attachment A, Hazards, PDC 7 and PDC 9(c)(ii) and (iii) delete “Bushfire Protection Area BPA Maps -

Bushfire Risk” and replace with “Figures Baro(BPA)/1 to 16”. 6. In Attachment A, Hazards, after PDC 7 insert new PDC as follows and renumber balance of PDCs

accordingly:

“8 Development in a Bushfire Protection Area should be in accordance with those provisions of the Minister’s Code: Undertaking development in Bushfire Protection Areas that are designated as mandatory for Development Plan Consent purposes.”

7. In Attachment B, Desired Character, seventh paragraph, delete “The Barossa Council” 8. In Attachment B, Desired Character, Mount Pleasant, second paragraph delete “Overlay Maps Baro/7,

34, 37, 40 – Heritage” 9. In Attachment B, delete PDCs 7 and 8 and renumber remaining PDCs accordingly. 10. In Attachment B, PDC 10, delete “Development within the Precinct 26 Eden Valley Character and

Precinct 33 Springton Character shown on Overlay Map Baro/20 – Precincts and Overlay Map Baro/37 - Precincts respectively” and replace with “Development within the Eden Valley Character Policy Area and Springton Character Policy Area”.

11. In Attachment B, immediately after Land Division heading insert new PDC as follows:

“11 Allotments in Mount Pleasant should have sufficient area to accommodate appropriate development and satisfactory waste disposal that will not cause or contribute to pollution of the River Torrens/Karrawirra Parri or the metropolitan water supply.”

12. In Attachment B, PDC 10, delete “Policy Area 41 and Policy Area 42” and replace with “Residential

Policy Area 41 and Mixed Use Policy Area 42”. 13. In Attachment C introductory text, delete “67” and replace with “Baro/67”. 14. In Attachment C, delete PDC 9 and replace with:

“9 Allotments should vary in size and be suitable to facilitate a range of housing forms consistent with the objectives and desired character of the policy area, and should be not less than 800 square metres in area and have a frontage of not less than 15 metres unless:

(a) for the purposes of retirement or aged persons accommodation; or (b) for the purposes of affordable housing; or (c) located directly opposite existing or proposed public open space; or (d) not directly visible to existing township approach roads including the Mount Pleasant-

Sanderston Road, Mount Pleasant-Springton Road, Melrose Street and the Mount Pleasant-Tungkillo Road.”

15. In Attachment D introductory text, delete “67” and replace with “Baro/67”. 16. In Attachment D (Mixed Use Policy Area 42) amend to remove focus on, and provision for, commercial

and industrial development, remove policies regarding development fronting Chibnalls Road, and remove policies relating to off-street parking and access as these are covered by existing Council-wide policies (refer annotated Amendment for details).

17. In Attachment D (Mixed Use Policy Area 42) Concept Plan Figure T/1, extend the “Potential School /

Hospital Expansion and Health / Education / High-level care” notation to Chibnalls Road.


18. In Attachment D, Public Notification, delete “Light industry” and insert the following envisaged forms of

development:

– Community support services – Consulting rooms – Educational establishment – Group dwelling for the purposes of a retirement village – Hospital – Nursing home – Residential flat building for the purposes of a retirement village – Retirement village

19. With respect to the cemetery at Lot 649 Herriott Road (Lot 649 FP 169588):

– In Attachment D, Concept Plan Figure T/1 remove from Residential Policy Area – In Attachment F, Structure Plan Map Baro/1 (Overlay 1) Enlargement J remove from Living area – In Attachment G, Map Baro/36 include in Watershed Zone – In Attachment H, Map Baro/42 include in Watershed Zone – In Attachment J, Map Baro/63 remove from Residential Policy Area

20. With respect to the cemetery at Lot 687 Springton Road (Lot 687 FP 169626):

– In Attachment D, Concept Plan Figure T/1 remove from Residential Policy Area – In Attachment F, Structure Plan Map Baro/1 (Overlay 1) Enlargement J remove from Living area – In Attachment G, Map Baro/36 include in Watershed Zone – In Attachment I, Map Baro/43 include in Watershed Zone – In Attachment K, Map Baro/67 remove from Residential Policy Area

21. In Attachment C, Concept Plan Figure T/1 show a vehicular access point on the north side of Tungkillo

Road at a point approx 120 m south of William Street. 22. In Attachment C, Concept Plan Figure T/1 Residential Policy Area, include buffers on all boundaries

abutting rural land. 23. In Attachment C after PDC 9 insert the following new PDC:

Stormwater management 10 Development should be designed to achieve the following water pollution reduction and stormwater

runoff quality targets:

Table 1 Stormwater Quality Performance Objectives Pollutant Performance Objective

Suspended solids (SS) 80% reduction in average annual pollutant export compared to an equivalent urban catchment with no water quality management controls

Total phosphorus (TP) 45% reduction in average annual pollutant export compared to an equivalent urban catchment with no water quality management controls

Total nitrogen (TN) 45% reduction in average annual pollutant export compared to an equivalent urban catchment with no water quality management controls

Litter/gross pollutants Retention of litter greater than 50 millimetres for flows up to the 3 month ARI peak flow


SCPA Report

7

Oil and grease No visible oils for flows up to the 3 month ARI peak flow

Table 2: Stormwater Performance objectives for Rates of Runoff Rainfall Event Runoff Performance Objective For up to the 5 year ARI

Pre-development peak flows not exceeded. The time to peak matches that of the pre development case as far as practical, provided that this does not exacerbate downstream flooding. Run off is contained within designated flow paths that avoid unplanned nuisance flooding

For the 5 year up to the 100 year ARI

Flooding of residential, commercial institutional, recreational and industrial buildings is avoided. The time to peak matches that of the pre development case as far as practical (provided that this does not exacerbate downstream flooding), unless catchment wide benefits can be demonstrated (i.e. for 100 year ARI only) Pre-development peak flows not exceeded

24. In Attachment E, Non-complying list, delete “Horticulture”. 25. With respect to Lot 650 William Street (Lot 650 FP 169589) [Parcel 10]:

– In Attachment D, Concept Plan Figure T/1 and include in Residential Policy Area – In Attachment F, Structure Plan Map Baro/1 (Overlay 1) Enlargement J include in Living area – In Attachment H, Map Baro/42 include in Township Zone – In Attachment J, Map Baro/63 include in Residential Policy Area

26. With respect to Piece 94 Tungkillo Road (Piece 94 FP 170567) [Parcel 12]:

– In Attachment D, Concept Plan Figure T/1 include in Deferred Urban area – In Attachment F, Structure Plan Map Baro/1 (Overlay 1) Enlargement J include in Deferred Urban

area – In Attachment H, Map Baro/42 include in Deferred Urban Zone – In Attachment J, Map Baro/63 include remove from Residential Policy Area


Attachment A —Summary and Response to public submissions

Attachment A – Summary and Response to public submissions


Attachment B – Summary and Response to Public Meeting Submissions

Attachment B – Summary and Response to Public Meeting Submissions


Attachment C — SCPA Timeframe Report: Process A

Attachment C – Timeframe Report

SCPA Timeframe Report: Process A / 1 Step

The SOI was agreed by the Minister and Council on 21 August 2009 Key steps Period agreed to in SOI Actual time taken Reason for

difference (if applicable)

Investigations conducted and draft DPA prepared

2 weeks "Council to insert length of time"

Agency consultation conducted (report on any delays incurred by agencies)

6 weeks 6 weeks

Agency comments assessed, DPA refined and sent to Minister with a request to commence public consultation

1 week 6 weeks Required time under-estimated

Public consultation approved

2 weeks 8 weeks Unknown

DPA prepared for public consultation

1 week 3 weeks Logistical aspects

Public consultation conducted

8 weeks 8 weeks and 1 day (11 March – 7 May 2010)

Public Hearing held, submissions summarised and DPA amended in accordance with Council’s assessment of submissions. Summary of Consultations and Proposed Amendments submitted to Minister for approval.

4 weeks: Public meeting – 1 week after end consultation Submission assessment – 2 weeks Submit package for approval – 1 week

Public meeting – 24 May 2010 (17 days after end consultation) Submission assessment – 20 July 2010 (8 weeks) Submit package for approval – Late July 2010 (10 days)

Number of submissions received; complexity of issues raised; need to review lot yields based on alternative minimum lot size


Attachment D — Schedule 4A Certificate

Attachment D – Schedule 4A Certificate


Attachment K — Recommended changes to Amendment following consultation

Attachment E – Schedule 4B Certificate

The Barossa Council · (Delete/Replace/Insert) Re-numbering required (Y/N) Subsequent policy...

Documents

Transcript of The Barossa Council · (Delete/Replace/Insert) Re-numbering required (Y/N) Subsequent policy...