The “Ground” Myth - IEEE...November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 28 Comparison of Decoupling...

137
The “Ground” Myth Bruce Archambeault, Ph.D. IBM Distinguished Engineer, IEEE Fellow [email protected] 18 November 2008 IEEE

Transcript of The “Ground” Myth - IEEE...November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 28 Comparison of Decoupling...

The “Ground” MythBruce Archambeault, Ph.D.

IBM Distinguished Engineer, IEEE [email protected]

18 November 2008

IEEE

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 2

Introduction

• Electromagnetics can be scary– Universities LOVE messy math

• EM is not hard, unless you want to do the messy math

• Goal:– Intuitive understanding– Understand the basic fundamentals – Understand how to read the math

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 3

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 4

Overview

• What does the derivative mean?• What does integration mean?• Weird vector notation• In the beginning – Faraday and Maxwell• Inductance• “Ground”• Primary cause of EMI problems on

PCBs

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 5

Derivative

• How fast is somethingchanging?

[ ]somethingdtd Changing with

respect to time

[ ]somethingdxd Changing with respect

to position (x)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 6

Partial Derivative

• How fast is something changing for one variable?

[ ]),( xtsomethingt∂∂

Changing with respect to time (as ‘x’ is constant)

Changing with respect to position (x) (as time is constant)

[ ]),( xtsomethingx∂∂

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 7

Integration

• Simply the sum of parts (when the parts are very small)– Line Integral --- sum of small line segments– Surface Integral -- sum of small surface

patches– Volume Integral -- sum of small volume blocks

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 8

Line Integral (find the length of the path)

)( dlEVstop

start

•−=→

dl

‘piece’ of E field

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 9

Line Integral -- Closed

∫= boxaroundpathnceCircumfere

x

y

∫∫∫∫=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

+++=00

00

y

wy

x

lx

wy

y

lx

x

dydxdydx

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 10

Line Integral -- Closed

• Closed line integrals find the path length

• And/or the amount of some quantity along that closed path length

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 11

Surface Integral(find the area of the surface)

∫∫

∗=

∗=

=

dydxArea

dydxda

daArea

As dx and dy become smaller and smaller, the area is better calculated

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 12

Volume Integral(find the volume of an object)

∫∫∫

∗∗=

∗∗=

=

][ dzdydxVolume

dzdydxdv

dvVolume

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 13

ElectromagneticsIn the Beginning

• Electric and Magnetic effects not connected

• Electric and magnetic effects were due to ‘action from a distance’

• Faraday was the 1st to propose a relationship between electric lines of force and time-changing magnetic fields– Faraday was very good at experiments and

‘figuring out’ how things work

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 14

Maxwell• Maxwell was

impressed with Faraday’s ideas

• Discovered the mathematical link between the “electro” and the “magnetic”

• Scotland’s greatest contribution to the world (next to Scotch)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 15

“Maxwell’s Equations”

• Maxwell’s original work included 20 equations!

• Heaviside reduced them to the existing four equations– Heaviside refused to call the equations his

own• Hertz is credited with proving they are

correct

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 16

Maxwell’s Equations are NOT Hard!

tBE

tDJH

∂∂

∂∂

−=×∇

+=×∇

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 17

Maxwell’s Equations are not Hard!

• Change in H-field across space ¡ Change in E-field (at that point) with time

• Change in E-field across space ¡ Change in H-field (at that point) with time

• (Roughly speaking, and ignoring constants)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 18

Current Flow• Most important concept of EMC• Current flow through metal changes as

frequency increases• DC current

– Uses entire conductor– Only resistance inhibits current

• High Frequency– Only small part of conductor (near surface) is used– Resistance is small part of current inhibitor– Inductance is major part of current inhibitor

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 19

Skin Depth• High frequency current flows only near the

metal surface at high frequencies

Frequency Skin Depth Skin Depth 60 Hz 260 mils 8.5 mm 1 KHz 82 mils 2.09 mm 10 KHz 26 mils 0.66 mm

100 KHz 8.2 mils 0.21 mm 1 MHz 2.6 mils 0.066 mm 10 MHz 0.82 mils 0.021 mm

100 MHz 0.26 mils 0.0066 mm 1 GHz 0.0823 mils 0.0021 mm

μσπδ

f1

=

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 20

Inductance

• Current flow through metal => inductance!

• Fundamental element in EVERYTHING• Loop area first order concern• Inductive impedance increases with

frequency and is MAJOR concern at high frequencies

fLX L π2=

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 21

Current Loop => Inductance

Courtesy of Elya Joffe

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 22

Inductance Definition

• Faraday’s Law∫ ∫∫ ⋅

∂∂

−=⋅ SdtBdlE

tBAV∂∂

−=V

B

Area = A

• For a simple rectangular loop

The minus sign means that the induced voltage will work against the current that originally created the magnetic field!

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 23

Self Inductance

• Isolated circular loop⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛−≈ 28ln

00 r

aaL μ

⎟⎟

⎜⎜

⎛+−+−+

+++

= 22

0 1121121

1ln2 p

ppppaL

πμ

• Isolated rectangular loop

Note that inductance is directly influenced by loop AREA and only less influenced by conductor size!

radiuswiresideoflengthp =

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 24

Partial Inductance

• Simply a way to break the overall loopinto pieces in order to find total inductance

L3

L4

L2

L1

L total=Lp11+ Lp22 + Lp33 + Lp44 - 2Lp13 - 2Lp24

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 25

Important Points About Inductance

• Inductance is everywhere• Loop area most important• Inductance is everywhere

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 26

Decoupling Capacitor Mounting

• Keep as to planes as close to capacitor pads as possible

Height above Planes

Via Separation

Inductance Depends on Loop AREA

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 27

Via Configuration Can Change Inductance

Via

Capacitor Pads

SMT Capacitor

The “Good”

The “Bad”

The “Ugly”

Really “Ugly”

Better

Best

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 28

Comparison of Decoupling Capacitor Impedance100 mil Between Vias & 10 mil to Planes

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

1.0E+06 1.0E+07 1.0E+08 1.0E+09 1.0E+10

Frequency (Hz)

Impe

danc

e (o

hms)

1000pF

0.01uF

0.1uF

1.0uF

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 29

Comparison of Decoupling Capacitor Via Separation Distance Effects

10 mils

Via Separation

0603 Typical Minimum

Dimensions

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 30

Connection Inductance for Typical Capacitor Configurations

3.2 nH3.7 nH4.2 nH1003.0 nH3.5 nH3.9 nH902.8 nH3.2 nH3.6 nH802.6 nH3.0 nH3.4 nH702.3 nH2.7 nH3.1 nH602.1 nH2.5 nH2.8 nH501.9 nH2.2 nH2.5 nH401.6 nH1.9 nH2.2 nH301.3 nH1.6 nH1.8 nH200.9 nH1.1 nH1.2 nH10

0402 typical/minimum(106 mils between via

barrels)

0603 typical/minimum

(128 mils between via barrels)

0805 typical/minimum (148 mils between via

barrels)

Distance into board to planes (mils)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 31

‘Ground’

• Ground is a place where potatoes and carrots thrive!

• ‘Earth’ or ‘reference’ is more descriptive • Original use of “GROUND”• Inductance is everywhere

fLX L π2=

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 32

What we Really Mean when we say ‘Ground’

• Signal Reference• Power Reference• Safety Earth• Chassis Shield Reference

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 33

‘Ground’ is NOT a Current Sink!

• Current leaves a driver on a trace and must return (somehow) to its source

• This seems basic, but it is often forgotten, and is most often the cause of EMC problems

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 34

‘Grounding’ Needs Low Impedance at Highest Frequency

• Steel Reference Plate– 4 milliohms/sq @ 100KHz– 40 milliohms/sq @ 10 MHz– 400 milliohms/sq @ 1 GHz

• A typical via is about 2 nH– @ 100 MHz Z = 1.3 ohms– @ 500 MHz Z = 6.5 ohms– @ 1000 MHz Z = 13 ohms– @ 2000 MHz Z = 26 ohms

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 35

Where did the Term “GROUND” Originate?

• Original Teletype connections• Lightning Protection

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 36

Ground/Earth

TeletypeReceiver

TeletypeTransmitter

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 37

Ground/Earth

TeletypeReceiver

TeletypeTransmitter

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 38

Lightning striking houseFIG 7

Lightning

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 39

Lightning effect without rod

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 40

Lightning effect with rod

Lightning rodLightning

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 41

What we Really Mean when we say ‘Ground’

• Signal Reference• Power Reference• Safety Earth• Chassis Shield Reference

Circuit “Ground”

Chassis “Ground”

Digital “Ground”

D

Analog “Ground”

A

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 42

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 43

Schematic with return current shown

IC1 IC2 IC3

Return currents on ground

Signal trace currents

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 44

Actual Current Return is 3-Dimensional

Ground Layer

Signal Trace

IC

Ground Vias

Ground Layer

Signal TraceICGround Via

BOARD STACK UP:

Ground Layer

Signal TraceCURRENT LOCATION:

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 45

Low Frequency Return Currents Take Path of Least Resistance

Ground Plane

DriverReceiver

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 46

High Frequency Return Currents Take Path of Least Inductance

Ground Plane

DriverReceiver

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 47

PCB Example for Return Current Impedance

Trace

GND Plane

22” trace

10 mils wide, 1 mil thick, 10 mils above GND plane

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 48

PCB Example for Return Current Impedance

Trace

GND Plane

Shortest DC path

For longest DC path, current returns under trace

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 49

MoM Results for Current DensityFrequency = 1 KHz

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 50

MoM Results for Current DensityFrequency = 1 MHz

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 51

U-shaped Trace InductancePowerPEEC Results

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0.55

0.6

1.0E+03 1.0E+04 1.0E+05 1.0E+06 1.0E+07 1.0E+08

Frequency (Hz)

indu

ctan

ce (u

H)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 52

Microstrip Transmission Line

Stripline Transmission Line

DielectricReference Planes

Signal Trace

Traces/nets over a Reference Plane

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 53

Signal Traces

Reference Planes

(Power, “Ground”, etc.)

Traces/nets and Reference Planes in Many Layer Board Stackup

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 54

Microstrip Electric/Magnetic Field Lines(8mil wide trace, 8 mils above plane, 65 ohm)

Electric Field Lines

Vcc

Courtesy of Hyperlynx

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 55

Microstrip Electric/Magnetic Field LinesCommon Mode

8 mil wide trace, 8 mils above plane, 65/115 ohm)

Electric Field Lines

VccCourtesy of Hyperlynx

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 56

Microstrip Electric/Magnetic Field LinesDifferential Mode

8 mil wide trace, 8 mils above plane, 65/115 ohm)

Electric Field Lines

Vcc

Courtesy of Hyperlynx

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 57

Electric/Magnetic Field LinesSymmetrical Stripline

Vcc

GND

Courtesy of Hyperlynx

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 58

Electric/Magnetic Field LinesSymmetrical Stripline (Differential)

Vcc

GND

Courtesy of Hyperlynx

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 59

Electric/Magnetic Field LinesAsymmetrical Stripline

Vcc

GND

Courtesy of Hyperlynx

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 60

Electric/Magnetic Field LinesAsymmetrical Stripline (Differential)

Courtesy of Hyperlynx

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 61

What About Pseudo-Differential Nets?

• So-called differential traces are NOT truly differential– Two complementary single-ended drivers

• Relative to ‘ground’– Receiver is differential

• Senses difference between two nets (independent of ‘ground’)

• Provides good immunity to common mode noise• Good for signal quality/integrity

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 62

Pseudo-Differential Nets Current in Nearby Plane

• Balanced/Differential currents have matching current in nearby plane– No issue for discontinuities

• Any unbalanced (common mode) currents have return currents in nearby plane that must return to source!– All normal concerns for single-ended nets

apply!

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 63

Pseudo-Differential Nets

• Not really ‘differential’, since more closely coupled to nearby plane than each other

• Slew and rise/fall variation cause common mode currents!

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 64

Differential Voltage Pulse with Skew1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec rise/fall time

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (nsec)

Volta

ge

Complementary -- Line1Complementary -- Line 2Skew=2psSkew=6psSkew = 10psSkew = 20psSkew = 30psSkew =40psSkew =50psSkew =60ps

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 65

Common Mode VoltageFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Skew

1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec rise/fall time

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (nsec)

Volta

ge

BalancedSkew=2psSkew=6psSkew =10psSkew =20psSkew =30psSkew =40psSkew =50ps

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 66

Common Mode CurrentFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Skew

1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec Rise/fall Time

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (nsec)

Leve

l (m

a)

BalancedSkew=2psSkew=6psSkew =10psSkew =20psSkew =30psSkew =40psSkew =50psSkew =60ps

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 67

Common Mode CurrentFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Skew

1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec Rise/fall Time

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

1.E+08 1.E+09 1.E+10 1.E+11

Frequency (Hz)

Leve

l (dB

uA)

Skew=2psSkew=6psSkew =10psSkew =20psSkew =30psSkew =40psSkew =50psSkew =60ps

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 68

Differential Voltage Pulse with Rise/Fall Variation/Unbalance1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec Nominal Rise/Fall Time

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (ns)

Leve

l (vo

lts) Original Pulse rise=95ps

Complementary Pulse Rise=90psComplementary Pulse Rise=80psComplementary Pulse Rise=105psComplementary Pulse Rise=115ps

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 69

Common Mode VoltageFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Various Rise/Fall Unbalance

1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec Nominal Rise/Fall Time

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (ns)

Volta

ge

Complementary Pulse Rise=90ps

Complementary Pulse Rise=80ps

Complementary Pulse Rise=105ps

Complementary Pulse Rise=115ps

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 70

Common Mode CurrentFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Various Rise/Fall Unbalance

1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec Nominal Rise/fall Time

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (ns)

Cur

rent

(ma)

Complementary Pulse Rise=90psComplementary Pulse Rise=80psComplementary Pulse Rise=105psComplementary Pulse Rise=115ps

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 71

Common Mode CurrentFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Various Rise/Fall Unbalance

1 Gbit/sec with Nominal 95 psec Rise/fall Time

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

1.E+08 1.E+09 1.E+10 1.E+11

Frequency (Hz)

Leve

l (dB

ua)

Complementary Pulse Rise=90psComplementary Pulse Rise=80psComplementary Pulse Rise=105psComplementary Pulse Rise=115ps

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 72

Antenna StructuresDipole antenna

PCB GND planes

Non-Dipole antenna

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 73

Board-to-Board Differential Pair Issues

Connector

PCB Plane 1

PCB Plane 2

Microstrip

Microstrip

VGround-to-Ground

noise

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 74

Example Measured Differential Individual Signal-to-GND

Individual Differential Signals ADDED

Common Mode Noise 170 mV P-P

500 mV P-P (each)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 75

Measured GND-to-GND Voltage

205 mV P-P

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 76

Pin Assignment Controls Inductance for CM signals

Signal Pin Related Ground Pins

37.17 nH 25.21 nH

16.85 nH 20.97 nH

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 77

Different pins within Same Pair may have Different Loop Inductance for CM

“Ground” pins Differential pair

2 1

34

“Ground” pins Differential pair

2 1

34

pin 1 -- 26.6nH

pin 2 -- 23.6nH

pin 3 -- 31.8nH

pin 4 -- 28.8nH

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 78

Pseudo-Differential Net Summary

• Small amounts of skew can cause significant common mode current

• Small amount of rise/fall time deviation can cause significant amount of common mode current

• Discontinuities (vias, crossing split planes, etc) and convert significant amount of differential current into common mode current

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 79

Return Current vs. “Ground”

• For high frequency signals, “Ground” is a concept that does not exist

• The important question is “where does the return current flow?”

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 80

Referencing Nets(Where does the Return Current Flow??)

• Microstrip/Stripline across split in reference plane

• Microstrip/Stripline through via (change reference planes)

• Mother/Daughter card

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 81

• Don’t Cross Splits with Critical Signals!!!– Bad practice– Stitching capacitor required across split to

allow return current flow• must be close to crossing• must have low inductance• limited frequency effect --- due to inductance

– Major source of Common Mode current!

Microstrip/Stripline Across Split in Reference Plane

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 82

Splits in Reference Plane

• Power planes often have splits• Return current path interrupted• Consider spectrum of clock signal• Consider stitching capacitor

impedance• High frequency harmonics not

returned directly

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 83

Split Reference Plane Example

PWR

GND

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 84

Split Reference Plane Example With Stitching Capacitors

PWR

GND

Stitching Capacitors Allow Return current to Cross Splits ???

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 85

Capacitor ImpedanceMeasured Impedance of .01 uf Capacitor

0.1

1.0

10.0

100.0

1.E+06 1.E+07 1.E+08 1.E+09

Frequency (Hz)

Impe

dnac

e (o

hms)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 86

Frequency Domain Amplitude of Intentional Current Harmonic AmplitudeFrom Clock Net

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

freq (MHz)

leve

l (dB

uA)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 87

MoM Microstrip Model Current Distribution Example

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 88

MoM Microstrip Model Current Distribution Example

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 89

Emissions From Board

• Far field emissions not important unless it is an unshielded product

• Near field emissions above board AREimportant

• Example of emissions from board with critical net crossing split reference plane

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 90

Near Field Radiation from Microstrip on Board with Split in Reference Plane

Comparison of Maximum Radiated E-Field for MicrostripWith and without Split Ground Reference Plane

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

10 100 1000

Frequency (MHz)

Max

imum

Rad

iate

d E-

Fiel

d (d

Buv

/m)

No-Split

Split

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 91

With “Perfectly Connected” Stitching Capacitors Across Split

Comparison of Maximum Radiated E-Field for MicrostripWith and without Split Ground Reference Plane and Stiching Capacitors

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

10 100 1000

Frequency (MHz)

Max

imum

Rad

iate

d E-

Fiel

d (d

Buv

/m)

No-Split

Split

Split w/ one Cap

Split w/ Two Caps

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 92

Stitching Caps with Via InductanceComparison of Maximum Radiated E-Field for Microstrip

With and without Split Ground Reference Plane and Stiching Capacitors

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

10 100 1000

Frequency (MHz)

Max

imum

Rad

iate

d E-

Fiel

d (d

Buv

/m)

No-SplitSplitSplit w/ one CapSplit w/ Two CapsSplit w/One Real CapSplit w/Two Real Caps

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 93

Example of Common-Mode Noise Voltage Across Split Plane Vs. Stitching Capacitor Distance to Crossing Point

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

Distance (mils)

Gap

Vol

tage

100MHz200MHz300MHz400MHz500MHz600MHz700MHz800MHz900MHz1000MHz

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 94

Are Stitching Capacitors Effective ???

• YES, at low frequencies • No, at high frequencies• Need to limit the high frequency current

spectrum• Need to avoid split crossings with ALL

critical signals

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 95

Pin Field Via Keepouts??

Return Current must go around entire keep out area --- just as bad as a slot

Return current path deviation minimal

sd

Recommend s/d > 1/3

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 96

Changing Reference Planes Six-Layer PCB Stackup Example

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Plane

Plane

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 97

Microstrip/Stripline through via (change reference planes)

TraceVia

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 98

How can the Return Current Flow When Signal Line Goes Through Via??

What happens to Return Current in this Region?

Return Current

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 99

How can the Return Current Flow When Signal Line Goes Through

Via??• Current can NOT go from one side of the

plane to the other through the plane– skin depth

• Current must go around plane at via hole, through decoupling capacitor, around second plane at the second via hole!

• Use displacement current between planes

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 100

Reference Planes

What happens to Return Current in this Region?

Return Current Trace Current

Displacement Current

Return Current Across Reference Plane Change

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 101

Return Current Across Reference Plane Change

With Decoupling Capacitor

Reference Planes

Return Current

Decoupling Capacitor

Displacement Current

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 102

Return Current Across Reference Plane Change With Decoupling Capacitor (on Top)

Return Current

Decoupling Capacitor

Reference Planes

Displacement Current

Common-Mode Current

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 103June 2007 103

Location of Decoupling Capacitors (Relative to Via) is

Important!

• One Decoupling Capacitor at 0.5”• Two Decoupling Capacitors at 0.5”• Two Decoupling Capacitors at 0.25”

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 104June 2007 104

RF Current @ 700 MHz with One Capacitor 0.5” from Via

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 105June 2007 105

RF Current @ 700 MHz with One Capacitor 0.5” from Via

(expanded view)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 106June 2007 106

RF Current @ 700 MHz with Two Capacitors 0.5” from Via

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 107June 2007 107

RF Current @ 700 MHz with One Capacitor 0.5” from Via

(Expanded view)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 108June 2007 108

RF Current @ 700 MHz with Two Capacitors 0.25” from Via

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 109June 2007 109

RF Current @ 700 MHz with Two Capacitors 0.25” from Via

(expanded view)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 110June 2007 110

RF Current @ 700 MHz with One REAL Capacitor 0.5” from Via

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 111June 2007 111

RF Current @ 700 MHz with Two REAL Capacitors 0.5” from Via

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 112June 2007 112

RF Current @ 700 MHz with Two REAL Capacitors 0.25” from Via

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 113

BadSignal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Reference Plane

Reference Plane

Bad

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Reference Plane

Reference Plane

GoodSignal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Reference Plane

Reference Plane

Possible Routing OptionsSix-Layer Board

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 114

Compromise Routing Option forMany Layer Boards

Good Compromise

Reference Plane

Gnd

Vcc1

Lot’s of Decoupling caps near ASIC

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 115

Typical Driver/Receiver Currentsswitch IC loadIC

driverVDC

GND

CL

VCC

Z0, vp

GND

IC loadIC

driver

VCC

VCC

charge

logic 0-to-1

Z0, vp

IC loadIC

driver

GND

VCC

0 V

discharge

logic 1-to-0

Z0, vp

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 116

Suppose The Trace is Routed Next to Power (not Gnd)

Vcc1

Vcc1

“Fuzzy” Return Path Area

“Fuzzy” Return Path Area

Return Path Options:

-- Decoupling Capacitors

-- Distributed Displacement Current

TEM Transmission Line Area

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 117

Suppose The Trace is Routed Next to a DIFFERENT Power (not Gnd)

Return Path Options:

-- Decoupling Capacitors ??? May not be any nearby!!

-- Distributed Displacement Current – Increased current spread!!!

Vcc1

Vcc2

“Fuzzy” Return Path Area

“Fuzzy” Return Path Area

TEM Transmission Line Area

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 118

Via SummaryRoute critical signals on either side of ONE reference planeDrop critical signal net to selected layer close to driver/receiver

Many decoupling capacitors to help return currents

Do NOT change reference planes on critical nets unless ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY!!Make sure at least 2 decoupling capacitors within 0.2” of via with critical signals

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 119

Mother/Daughter Board Connector Crossing

• Critical Signals must be referenced to same plane on both sides of the connector

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 120

Mother/Daughter Board Connector Crossing

Connector

GND

PWR

Signal Layers

Signal Path

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 121

Return Current from Improper Referencing Across Connector

Return current

Connector

Decoupling CapacitorsDisplacement

Current

GND

PWR

Signal Layers

Signal Path

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 122

Return Current from Proper Referencing Across Connector

Connector

GND

PWR

Signal Layers

Signal Path

Return current

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 123

How Many “Ground” Pins Across Connector ???

• Nothing MAGICAL about “ground”• Return current flow!• Choose the number of power and “ground”

pins based on the number of signal lines referenced to power or “ground” planes

• Insure signals are referenced against same planes on either side of connector

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 124

Think about Return Currents!!

Reference plane should be continuous under all critical tracesWhen Vias are necessary make sure there are two close decoupling capacitorsWhen crossing a connector to a second board, make sure the critical trace is referenced to the same reference plane as the primary board

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 125

Ground-Reference Plane Noise(Voltage Difference Across Plane)

• Connection of large PC ‘ground’ planes to chassis important– ESD current can result in voltage difference

across ‘ground’ plane– Looks like input pulse to circuits– More connection to chassis will reduce this

voltage difference

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 126

Connection to Chassis

Good connection in I/O area important for emissions control!!

Connection to chassis away from I/O area NOT important for emissions control

Chassis

PCB gnd plane

Screw post

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 127

Connection to Chassis for ESD Control

Distributed Connection to chassis away from I/O area very important for ESD control

Chassis

PCB gnd plane

Screw post

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 128

Contacts for Chassis Connection

Screw head contact pad on top of PC Board

Vias to “Ground” planeCopper pad

Screw head

Want this!

NOT this!

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 129

Model for Current Simulations

Chassis

PCB gnd planeScrew post

Trace Source

Trace Load

ESD Voltage Between Chassis and gnd plane

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 130

Comparison of Trace Load Noise Voltagefor 1 Kv ESD Pulse from PCB GND to Chassis

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

Time (ns)

Load

Vol

tage

(vol

ts)

No Connection to ChassisOne connection to Chassis (Near I/O)Four Connections to Chassis (Near I/O)Eight Connections to Chassis 16 Connections to Chassis 20 Connections to Chassis

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 131

Comparison of Trace Load Noise Voltagefor 1 Kv ESD Pulse from PCB GND to Chassis

-3

-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

Time (ns)

Load

Vol

tage

(vol

ts)

No Connection to Chassis

One connection to Chassis (Near I/O)

Four Connections to Chassis (Near I/O)

Eight Connections to Chassis

16 Connections to Chassis

20 Connections to Chassis

Eight Connections to Chassis (4 @each end)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 132

Current Flow w/One Screw Post

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 133

Current Flow w/Eight Screw Posts

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 134

Current Flow w/20 Screw Posts

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 135

Current Flow w/Eight Screw Posts (4 each end)

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 136

Number ONE Problem

• Intentional signal return current

November 2008 Bruce Archambeault, PhD 137

Where to Go for More?

• Limited selection of EMC design books– Beware of some popular books!!!– “PCB Design for Real-World EMI Control” (good choice)

• Bruce Archambeault

• EMC ‘experts’– Experience is important– Again, beware ---- ask questions and understand WHY

• Cookbooks do not work! Every case is special and different