The American Gospel (in two part harmony): Clovis First and the Mackenzie corridor.
-
Upload
susan-singleton -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of The American Gospel (in two part harmony): Clovis First and the Mackenzie corridor.
The American Gospel (in two part harmony):
Clovis First and the Mackenzie corridor
Naco, Arizona Clovis cache
Clovis Point Mounted to Shaft
Atl atls: a Folsom tool
Folsom Point
The American Gospel (new testament):
3 Waves of Migration Supported by:
Archaeological Evidence (e.g. Clovis & Folsom)Linguistic evidence (Greenberg and Nichols)Genetic evidence (Cavalli-Sforza)Biological evidence (Turner and others)Geological evidence • Mackenzie Corridor (aka ice-free corridor)• Known existence of Beringia in late Pleistocene
Linguistic Evidence: Nichols and Greenberg
Dates BP
Linguistic & Genetic Evidence
32,000 ancestors of Amerindian speakers(now distributed over nearly all of the Americas)
11,000 - 14,000
ancestors of Na-Diné speakers(distributed over the northern half of North America)
6,800 - 7,400
ancestors of Eskimo-Aleut speakers(distributed in the northernmost part of North America)
Genetic Evidence: Cavalli-Sforza et al.
mtDNA analysis shows only four major groups of mtDNA in Native AmericansThese patterns are only found in America and AsiaDistribution of the traits shows a likely model of 3 “waves” of migration
First (Amerindian) 26-34,000 BPSecond (Amerindian) 12-15,000 BPThird (Na-Diné) 7-9,000 BP
Dental Evidence: Turner
Shoveled Incisors
Geological Evidence: Accessibility of Possible Routes
Dates BC Beringia"Land Bridge"
Coastal Route
Mackenzie Corridor
38,000-34,000
accessible (open)
open closed
34,000-30,000
submerged (closed)
open open
30,000-22,000
accessible (open)
closed open
22,000-15,000
accessible (open)
open closed
15,000 BC - today
submerged (closed)
open open
Hypothesis: Constant Native Presence
Supported by some oral historiesRefuted by:
Lack of evidence for infinite human occupationDisparity of agreement in native mythsScientific findings of people who just don’t look “Indian” e.g. the 9000 year old Kennewick Man in 1996
Hypothesis: European Origins
Supported by Stanford’s “Solutrean Solution” Fluted points and toolkits are nearly identicalRed ochre useCaching of large bifaces and other stockBrown et al. report mtDNA similarities
Refuted by: No boatsNo direct archaeological ties4500 year time gap between Clovis and Solutrean
Hypothesis:Pacific Crossing
Supported by:Age estimates at Monte Verde, Chile and other sites (12,000 to 30,000 BP)Morphology of ancient remains like LuziaMorphology of modern Tierra del Fuegans
Refuted by:Lack of evidence for boatsCould also be explained by an overland journey
Hypothesis: Pacific Coastal Route
Supported by:Daryl Fedje’s work off Queen CharlotteRecent evidence suggesting no ice-free corridor between 21,000 and 11,500 BPConsistent with much of “Clovis First”, but accounts for earlier dates now accepted
Refuted by:Difficulty of underwater excavation to build more solid case
Native American Origins:What are the Possibilities?