The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 An Update 09.2012

31
The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 Thursday 27 September 2012 ©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

description

An seminar considering the Agency Workers Regulations one year on, delivered by Langleys employment team in September 2012.

Transcript of The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 An Update 09.2012

Page 1: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

The Agency Workers Regulations 2010

Thursday 27 September 2012

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 2: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Introduction

• Agency Workers Regulations 2010 – What are the Regulations and who do they apply

to? – The TWA – “12 week rights” – The Hirer – “Day One Rights” – How to deal with the effects of the Regulations

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 3: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

What are the Agency Workers Regulations 2010?

• The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (AWR 2010) give Agency Workers (AWs) the right to equal treatment compared with employees recruited direct by the Hirer (Comparable Direct Recruits (“CDRs”) in respect of: - – Pay – Duration of working time – Night work – Rest periods – Annual leave – Access to facilities and employment

vacancies

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 4: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Who do the Regulations apply to?

• Agency Workers who find work through a Temporary Work Agency (TWA) whose function is to find Agency Workers for a Hirer

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 5: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Definitions – Temporary Work Agency

• Regulation 4(1):“A person engaged in the economic activity, public or private, whether or not operating for profit, and whether or not carrying on such activity in conjunction with others, of -

(a) supplying individuals to work temporarily for and under the supervision and direction of hirers; or

(b) paying for, or receiving or forwarding payment for, the services of individuals who are supplied work temporarily for an under the supervision and direction of hirers.”

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 6: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Definition - Agency Worker

• Regulation 3(1): -– A worker who is supplied by a

TWA to work temporarily for and under the supervision and direction of a Hirer; and

– Has a contract with the TWA which is either:

• A contract of employment with the TWA

• Any other contract to perform work and services personally

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 7: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Definition – Hirer

• Regulation 2: - – “a person engaged in economic activity, public

or private, whether or not operating for profit, to whom individuals are supplied, to work temporarily for and under the supervision and direction of that person”.

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 8: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Do the Regulations apply to your business?

- Businesses who take Day Work provision from a TWA.

- Not package work: this is where the Hirer pays an organisation to undertake a project on their behalf. These workers are not Agency Workers.

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 9: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

What obligations do the Regulations set out?

• Two sets of obligations: -

1. “Day One Rights” – responsibility of the Hirer

2. “12 week rights” – responsibility of the TWA

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 10: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

“12 week rights” – the qualifying period

• AWs are entitled to equal treatment with CDRs if they perform the same role with the same Hirer for 12 continuous calendar weeks (“the qualifying period”) (Regulation 7(2))

• 12 weeks do not have to be complete weeks of work – at some point during week AW engaged on an assignment (Regulation 7(4))

• After the qualifying period the CDR’s terms and conditions become the minimum terms and conditions an AW can receive

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 11: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Breaks in continuity of the 12 week qualifying period

• AW starts a new assignment with a new hirer • AW - new assignment with same TWA that is

“substantially different” from previous assignment

• Break of 6 calendar weeks or more • Certain absences e.g. a break of up to 28

weeks due to sickness or injury incapability will not break continuity

• Absences due to pregnancy, childbirth or maternity or leave relating to these – 12 weeks unaffected

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 12: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

“Day One Rights” – the Hirer

• Two main categories of “Day One Rights”: – Access to collective facilities and

amenities: equal right to facilities as CDRs

– Access to employment vacancies: Hirer required to tell AWs about any relevant vacancies

– “Day One Rights” apply from the moment the AW is on the Hirer’s premises

– The Hirer’s responsibility

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 13: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

“12 week rights” – relevance to hirers

• The Hirer also has a responsibility to provide information to allow the TWA to provide equal treatment as to the 12 week rights

• Breach of this by the Hirer (e.g. late, incorrect or failure to provide information) – Hirer held responsible

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 14: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

The Uncertain Respondent

• Employee becomes aware that their rights under the Regulations have been breached - unsure as to who is responsible. Is the default due to failure to provide information (Hirer) or failure to apply information (TWA)?

• The employee would be well advised to pursue both the

Hirer and the TWA.

• The ET would order a pre-hearing review to establish who is the correct respondent.

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 15: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

How can TWAs reassure their Hirer clients?

• Managed Service Contracts

• The “Swedish Derogation”

• Rotation of Employees

• An Indemnity

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 16: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Managed Service Contracts

• Option is only available to organisations that have the necessary expertise and structures in place.

• The Hirer would specify a task they would like an organisation to undertake and would allow the organisation to provide and manage workers through it. The workers may not fall under the Regulations.

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 17: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

The Swedish Derogation

Member States may…

provide that an exemption may be made to the principle [of equal

treatment] where temporary agency workers who have a permanent

contract of employment with a TWA continue to be paid in the time

between assignments" (Article 5.2).

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 18: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

The Swedish Derogation

• Regulations 10 and 11 reflect this. The AW will need to enter into a “Pay Between Assignments Contract”

• Advantage: the obligation to ensure equality of pay is removed (but only pay)

• Disadvantage: paying workers who are not working – who pays. TUPE!

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 19: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Rotation of employees – anti-avoidance provisions

• Problem – Hirers are not allowed to simply rotate AWs to avoid them accruing 12 weeks of continuous service

• Anti-avoidance provisions (Regulation 9) • Can rotate AWs – genuine reason which is not

avoidance • Breach – AW treated as if accrued 12 week

rights. Potential £5,000 fine for responsible party

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 20: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

An Indemnity

• Best way for TWAs to reassure their Hirer clients that the Regulations will not trouble them

• TWA indemnifies Hirer against any breach of Regulations – provision in contract

• Indemnity qualified – Hirer is responsible for “Day One Rights” and provision of information

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 21: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Pregnant Women & Nursing Mothers

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

• Paid time off for ante-natal medical appointments and classes.

• Alternative work – no less favourable; or• Full pay for the remainder of the assignment

Page 22: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Enforcement

• Right not to be dismissed on prescribed grounds • The right not to be subjected to a detriment on prescribed

grounds• Equal treatment rights infringed• Rights of access to employment or facilities have been

breached • Providing pay between assignments has been breached• Agency or hirer has unreasonably refused a woman paid time

off for ante-natal care • Agency or hirer has failed to pay the agency worker

remuneration where the supply of her work to a hirer is ended on maternity grounds

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 23: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Information Requests

• Similar to Fixed Term workers• Make a written request – informally• Formal Structure• Adverse inferences from failure to respond

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 24: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Remedies

• Week 12 Rights– TWA responsible for any breaches of rights in relation to an

agency worker's basic working and employment conditions to the extent that it is responsible for the infringement

– Defence - took "reasonable steps" to obtain relevant information from the hirer and acted "reasonably" in determining the agency worker's basic working and employment conditions after the qualifying period and for the remainder of the assignment.

– Then hirer will be fully responsible for any breach. – No equivalent defence for hirers

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 25: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Remedies

• Week 12 Rights– Hirer responsible for any breach to the extent that it is

responsible for the infringement – Multiple TWAs involved in proceedings– TWAs and hirers not jointly and severally liable for

breaches– Exchange information in a timely manner.

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 26: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Reasonable Steps Defence

Drafting errors in relation to the "reasonable steps" defence were highlighted by the Joint

Committee on Statutory Instruments in March 2010 and were corrected by the Agency

Workers (Amendment) Regulations 2011.

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 27: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Remedies

• Day 1 Rights– The hirer will be solely responsible for any breach

of regulations access to collective facilities and amenities and access to employment vacancies

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 28: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Contracting Out

– Notably, there has not been an amendment to section 203(2)(f) of the ERA 1996 so as to include the Regulations, and neither have the provisions of section 203 been replicated in the Regulations themselves, so:

• no effective mechanism for waiver of claims by means of a compromise agreement.

• Possible to settle claims pursuant to an Acas-conciliated agreement.

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 29: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Action points - TWA

• See handout for TWAs and Hirers

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

Page 30: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Any Questions?

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012

?

Page 31: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010    An Update   09.2012

Contact DetailsKate Hindmarch Phone No: 01522 508815

Email: [email protected]

Kelly Taylor Phone No: 01522 508785 Email: [email protected]

Danielle Lister Phone No: 01522 508715 Email: [email protected]

Rachael Keightley Phone No: 01522 508817 Email:

[email protected]

Website: www.langleys.com Twitter: @langleyslaw

©Langleys Solicitors LLP 2012