TH4.T05.3_IGARSS-2011-3233-BOUCHER.ppt
-
Upload
grssieee -
Category
Technology
-
view
310 -
download
0
Transcript of TH4.T05.3_IGARSS-2011-3233-BOUCHER.ppt
1
2
SPECTRAL REFLECTANCEMEASUREMENT METHODOLOGIES
FOR TUZ GOLU FIELD CAMPAIGN
Y. Boucher, F. Viallefont, A. Deadman, N. Fox , I. Behnert, D. Griffith, P. Harris, D. Helder, E. Knaeps, L. Leigh, Y. Li,
H. Ozen, F. Ponzoni, S. Sterckx
3
Outline
Introduction
Principles and instrumentations used for the field reflectance measurements
Measurement spatial sampling strategies
Results and conclusion
4
Introduction
Vicarious calibration = comparison of the radiance measured on-orbit and the radiance propagated from the optical or radiative properties of the measured reference test site
Radiance-based method: field upwelling radiance measurement at the time of the satellite acquisition + propagtion
Reflectance-based method: field reflectance measurement (same illumination conditions) + meas/model of the irradiance + propagationAdvantages: more accurate and detailed site characterization
One of the objective of 2010 CEOS Key comparison: Tuz Gölu campaign, was to compare different methods of field reflectance characterization for satellite calibration.
5
Principle of field reflectance mesurement (1)
Aim : Vicarious calibration of multispectral satellite sensors
→ Measurements of radiance and reflectance meas. have to be spectrally resolved
→ Ground measurements done with a spectroradiometer
Meas. on the surface at t1
Meas. on the reference at t2
Measurement of the reflectance is relative to a reference:
o Meas. of the radiance of the surface of interest at t1
o Meas. of the radiance the reference at t2
Rground = Rref x Sground(t1) / Sref(t2)
6
Possible compensation of irradiance temporal variation:
→ Measurement on the reference before and after measurement on the surface
Rground = Rref x Sground(t2) / Sref-mean with Sref-mean = [Sref(t1) + Sref(t3) ] / 2
Principle of field reflectance mesurement (2)
Meas. on the surface at t2
Meas. on the reference at
t1
Meas. on the reference at
t3
7
Possible compensation of BRDF effects:- Usually, the reference panel reflectance factor (calibration)
Rref = directional (8°)- hemispherical reflectance
- The reflectance factor Rsurface of the ground and of the panel measured outdoors = bidirectional reflectance + hemispherical-directional reflectance (because of the direct + diffuse illumination conditions)
- But the reference panel (like spectralon) is nearly lambertian but not exactly
Principle of field reflectance mesurement (3)
RD-Href
8°
IFOV
Rsurface
BRDF correction on the reference panel reflectance Rref is suitable, according to the solar zenith angle and the viewing zenith angle, for applying the equation:
Rground = Rref (θsun,θv) x Sground / Sref
BRF spectralon theta_v = 0° λ=633nm
0,70
0,75
0,80
0,85
0,90
0,95
1,00
1,05
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90théta_s
BR
F
0
2040
6080
90100
120140
160180
average
ϕ_v - phi_s
8
Instrumentation for spectral reflectance measurements of Tuz Gölü site: Sensors
CMA/NSMC, CSIR, GISTDA, KARI, ONERA, SDSU, TUBITAK and VITO used an ASD Fielspec spectroradiometer, calibrated in radiance
8° FOV
∅ 10-20 cm (depending on h)
h
1.8-2.5µm1-1.8µm0.35-1µmSpectral domain
InGaAsInGaAsCCDDetector
6.5nm8.5nm3nmSpectral resolution
2nm
resamp 1nm
2nm
resamp 1nm
1.4nm
resamp 1nm
Spectral sampling
Sample: 10 spectra averaged
Dark current: 25 spectra averaged
Measure-ments
INPE used a CIMEL 313 field multispectral radiometer
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
Wavelenght (nm)
Band_1
Band_2
Band_3
Band_4
Band_5
550450 650 850 1500 nm
FOV: 10°5 bands (filter wheel)Calibrated in radiance
9
Instrumentation for spectral reflectance measurements of Tuz Gölü site: Reference panels
All the reference panels were spectralon® from Labsphere, except one of NPL (Gigahertz Optik) and the one of CMA (Hefei Institute of Physical Science)
Reference panel were calibrated: • Directional-hemispherical reflectance, by Labsphere (CSIR, KARI, Tübitak)• Directional-hemispherical reflectance, by themthelves (NPL, Onera, INPR)• BRDF (SDSU, CMA)
10
Site description and spatial sampling of ground-based reflectance measurements
AVNIR-2 acquisition image of Tuz Gölü site on 15 Aug 2010
Problem: Area wide enough for satellite calibration Small enough to be measured on the ground in a
reasonable time Which sampling strategy for ground-based
reflectance measurement?
11
Sampling strategies
Challenges: Giving a good assessment of the mean reflectance of a (large) area Giving variations around this mean Do all the measurements in less than one hour if possible
3 sampling strategies: Spaced out sampling averaging several
measurements over one point
Space out sampling with estimation of the local spatial variability
In-motion sampling
etc
etc
etc10 10 10 10
12
Spaced out sampling averaging several measurements on each point (1)
Regular grid with spaced out sampling points Several measurements are averaged for each sampling point
→ allows evaluation of the type A uncertainty (repeatability)
Strategy used by Onera for 300m x 100m areas
21 sampling points. Time of measurement: 1 hour
For each sampling point: Optimization, Ref.x5, ground meas.x10, ref.x5
RréfPS
PSP
iref
igroundigroundR ×=
)(
)()(
∑=
=10
12 ),()(
jijgroundiground tPSPS ∑∑
==
⋅+⋅=5
135
15
115
1 ),(),()(j
ijrefj
ijrefiref tPStPSPS
( ) ( ))55(²
²
10²
²2
+⋅+
⋅=
ref
ref
ground
ground
repeat S
S
S
Su
σσ
40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m20m
30m
20m
20m
30m
40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m20m
30m
20m
20m
30m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m40 m20m20m
30m30m
20m20m
20m20m
30m30m
etc10 10 10 10
13
Spaced out sampling averaging several measurements on each point (2)
A similar strategy had also been used by: CSIR: for each point: optimisation, 5 references, 5 ground measurements
CSIR sampling for M3 300m x 100m area
14
Spaced out sampling averaging several measurements on each point (2)
A similar strategy had also been used by: CSIR: for each point optimisation, 5 references, 5 ground measurements INPE: 1h30 for ~30 points, for each: 5 references, 5 ground measurements
INPE sampling for one 300m x 100m area
15
Spaced out sampling averaging several measurements on each point (2)
A similar strategy had also been used by: CSIR: for each point optimisation, 5 references, 5 ground measurements INPE: 1h30 for 29-30 points, for each 5 references, 5 ground measurements Tübitak Uzay: 15 to 30 sampling points, ref. every 10-15min, 10 meas.
averaged for ref and ground
Tübitak Uzay's sampling for one 300m x 100 m area
16
Spaced out sampling averaging several measurements on each point (2)
A similar strategy had also been used by: CSIR: for each point optimisation, 5 references, 5 ground measurements INPE: 1h30 for 29-30 points, for each 5 references, 5 ground measurements Tübitak Uzay: 15 to 30 sampling points, ref. every 10-15min, 10 scans
averaged for ref and ground CMA: 11 sampling points in 1h30min, for each point: 2 ref. and 5 ground meas.
CMA's sampling for the M9 1km x 1km area
17
Spaced out sampling with local variability measurements
As previous strategy, uses a regular grid with spaced out sampling pointsFor each point of the grid, several meas. are locally recorded over different points near the nominal location
etc
Strategy used by VITO: for each sampling point: 5 ref., 4 points (4 meas. per point), 5 ref.
VITO's sampling strategy for the 300 m x 100 m areas (25 points)
Su
Local measurements for each sampling point
VITO's sampling strategy for the M9 1km x 1km area
(11 points) Drawback: time consuming
18
In-motion sampling (1)
The “In-motion” technique was developed by University of Arizona and South Dakota State University (SDSU). The ASD spectrometer operator is moving continuously and measuring every few seconds (⇔ few meters).
Ref. panel is measured at the beginning and the end of the transect.
Advantage: high number of measurements are done in a short time
Strategy used by SDSU: 20 meas. continuously acquired / 2.5m, averaged in one sample.
100 samples / row.
300m x 100m area measured in 30 minutes
North
Ref. panel meas. 8°
FOV
~10cm
x 2.5m
19
In-motion sampling (2)
A similar strategy had also been used by: CSIR: for each transect: optimisation, 5 ref, continuous measurements, 5 ref at
the end
CSIR in-motion sampling for M3 300m x 100m area
20
In-motion sampling (2)
A similar strategy had also been used by: CSIR: for each transect: optimisation, 5 ref, continuous measurements, 5 ref at
the end Onera for M9 1km x 1km area: 10 meas. continuously acquired / 15m-20m
(10s), averaged in one sample. ~50 samples / transect.
Onera in-motion sampling for M9 1km x 1km area
21
Results comparison (1)
All teams pre-process the data, and supplied to NPL the reflectance factor R(λ) with the associated standard uncertainty Type A and Type B
NPL re-calculated the RF of the site, as a weighted mean of the individual sampling points values and the associated standard uncertainty to this weighted RF value
The results are still preliminary, since some data of some teams have to be recalculated.
The plotted RF had been measured at different dates (17 to 25 August 2010) – for similar sun zenith angles
Good agreement (+/- 0.02)
M4 300m x 300m area reported reflectance
22
Results comparison (2)
Results on M9 1km x 1km site: (Less) good agreement (+/- 0.05 in
the visible, +/- 0.03 in the SWIR Site bigger higher sensitivity to
spatial variability; Longer time of measurement
different sun Zenith angles
M9 1km x 1km area reported reflectance
Possible reasons of the differences: Measurements bias and uncertainties, Temporal variability of the reflectance (solar zenith angle difference
30° to 40°, soil humitity content) Slight directional effects on ref. panel Spatial variability
23
Conclusion
Ground-based reflectance measurements of Tuz Gölü site has been made by 9 teams
Similarities: Instrumentation (ASD fieldspec, except INPE) Preliminary intercalibration (spectroradiometers and reference
panels) "Best practise sharing" before the experiment (Tuz Gölü 2009)
Differences: 3 different sampling strategies: spaced out sampling, spaced
out sampling with local variability, in motion sampling Non simultaneity of the measurements
Promissing results: Good agreement between the measurements made by the
different teams Some reprocessing in progress…