Testimony Calling for Independent Investigation of CFSA DC
-
Upload
corruptionindc -
Category
Documents
-
view
107 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Testimony Calling for Independent Investigation of CFSA DC
1
Testimony Calling for Independent Investigation of CFSA Before the DC Counsel CFSA Oversight Hearing of Mar. 11, 2010
-- Roy Morris, Esq.--
Chairman Wells, and Members of the Committee, my name is Roy Morris, and I
am here as a public interest advocate. Today I urge the City Council to initiate an
independent investigation by either Federal Authorities or an independent counsel,
like Mr. Bennett, to look into the depth and breadth of the corruption at Child and
Family Services Agency (CFSA).
It has been almost a year since I last came before you highlighting the case of
how CFSA failed a now six-year- old child living in Ward 3. It is my opinion that by any
reasonable standard, CFSA failed to properly investigate complaints filed by mandated
reporters in that case. In this case, CFSA went out of its way to avoid finding abuse and
neglect.
My experience supports many of the allegations found in the December 6, 2008
letter of the “Concerned Social Workers.” That insightful letter was sent to the
Washington Post, Chairman Wells, and Federal Judge Hogan. It spoke of unethical
CFSA practices in closing cases, including cases being closed by administrators and
lawyers at CFSA.
For the suffering little girl mentioned, her situation appears to me to have become
worse due to CFSA’s failures. Those failures have left her in unnecessary danger
with severe chronic neutropenia of undiagnosed cause -- a life-threatening very
rare blood disease, which evidence strongly suggests is induced by drugs commonly
used for covering up abuse. CFSA ignored these and other facts.
When I came before you a year ago, I sincerely believed that the irregularities we
had witnessed were simply caused by an agency that did not have the will or skill to do
2
its’ job. As the irregularities have become greater and certain CFSA employee
actions more antithetical to the agency’s purpose..... including attempts to prevent
other institutions from finding abuse and providing help for this child –- an innocent
explanation no longer seems plausible to me.
Disturbing facts have come to light that give answers, I believe, as to why high
ranking CFSA employees have abdicated their responsibilities, interfered with the
CFSA investigations, and, also in my opinion, have acted beholden and protective of
abusers and their attorneys.
Today, we must take a stand to save this child, and others like her, by giving them
immediate relief and safety. Organizations from around the world and the US,
including members of Congress, have been made aware and are looking for this
situation to be corrected. Will Washington DC once again make the headlines and
have to explain why another child’s life was lost while this agency looked the other way?
The explanation for this corruption that I refer to is both disturbing and appalling.
One very egregious example involves one key high-ranking official of CFSA. Not a
widely known fact, it involves a high ranking CFA official who was arrested for a
sexual offense, and went into a sex offender diversion program that included: one year
supervised probation, and psychological evaluation.
Why would a person with such a background be allowed to work in CFSA, or any
other agency involved with the welfare of children?
How was the District made aware of this person’s background, and what did it do
about it?
What is the magnitude of the impact this little known fact can have on such a
person’s independence to advocate for abused children, rather than for suspected
3
abusers -- who would be inclined to use this information to pressure such a
CFSA official to prematurely close and improperly dismiss abuse cases?
Only through an independent investigation can the depth and breadth of this
problem be uncovered, and the damage it has caused to the children of Washington DC
corrected. In the interim, we ask that the DC Counsel order the immediate reopening,
investigation, and corrective action in all cases, including the case of the six year
old neutropenic little girl, that were wrongfully interfered with by those corrupted
employees.
Background
Based on my understanding, the six year old child lives isolated in a small one-
bedroom apartment, in a windowless bedroom, sleeps in a queen sized bed that takes
up most of that windowless room. She has – on a number of occasions – told medical
and psychological personnel and forensic interviewers that her father sleeps in her bed,
the “poppo gets harder and harder,” and that her father does “bad touch” while pointing
to her inner thighs. Consistent with medical harm, she now has a very rare blood
disorder, that only appeared soon as she disclosed that her “papa gives me green
medicine to make me sick. But don’t tell him I told you.” Dr. Joy Silberg, a mandated
reporter who is an internationally recognized specialist in abused children, submitted a
written complaint to CFSA. However, even after CFSA social workers claim to have
visited this one bedroom apartment that is used as an a multibedroom living quarters,
and examined these documented facts, that was not enough for CFSA to investigate
further.
The six year old child suffers from a very rare blood disease called severe chronic
neutropenia that can be induced with drugs, – a condition similar to AIDS –that leaves
4
the body with little defense to fatal infection. With this disease, one day the patient can
look fine, ....the next day catch an infection,.... and the next day die from the infection
that your and my body can easily tolerate, but hers cannot. However, when the father
failed to take the child to a hematologist/oncologist on his own for months – it hardly
raised an eyebrow at CFSA. This is despite the fact that at least two medical experts
had expressed concern that the suspected abuser failed to take such basic diagnostic
actions. One of the world’s leading pediatric severe chronic neutropenia expert
researcher and physician who is the Co-Director of the Severe Chronic Neutropenia
International Registry, has reviewed the same records as CFSA, and concluded that the
child’s severe neutropenia is likely due to toxins/drugs – including the type that a
neurologist, such as the father, would have access to. Again, this CFSA did little for the
child, and failed to follow its own protocol for independent evaluations.
Based on the records, a sexual abuse investigation at Children’s National Medical
Center (CNMC) appears to me to have been made purposely superficial and
misdirected by the unexplainable actions of CFSA. The CFSA social worker involved --
who had already preliminarily concluded that there was no abuse – allowed the
suspected father to accompany the little girl to CNMC. Once there, the CFSA social
worker appears to have instructed CNMC not to interview the child, misinformed them
by telling them that the mother was the source of the reports about abuse, and failed to
mention that the written complaints were submitted to CFSA by multiple mandated
reporters. As any person familiar with sexual abuse investigations knows, an interview
can only be successfully done without the abuser present and such an interview is
critically important to such an investigation. To make matters worse, CFSA used that
superficial sexual abuse investigation as a fraudulent basis for claiming in other venues
5
that the medical neglect concerns involving the severe neutropenia were “unfounded.”
In addition, even without speaking to the child, the records show that CNMC diagnosed
her with “post traumatic stress disorder,” and recommended regular therapy for the child
but there is no record of any follow-up by the father or CFSA to assure that therapy was
provided. That alone should have been a basis for finding neglect.
After that very brief irregular investigation was quickly opened and closed as
“unfounded,” a high level executive of CFSA demanded medical records from
Georgetown University Hospital – where the CFSA request made the material
misrepresentation that the child was a “District of Columbia committed ward.” When
questioned, Dr. Roque Gerald wrote a reply claiming that the high level CFSA executive
was simply the using a generic form – but he did not explain why a generic form having
such a material misrepresentation was used. No explanation was given why additional
inquiry was being made by CFSA after it supposedly had closed the earlier investigation
as unfounded. Were those earlier cases really closed? Where they really found to be
unfounded? Was CFSA having second thoughts? Did CFSA know that the records it
received from Georgetown were incomplete because they did not include all test
results? How many other instances has CFSA used this generic form to obtain
information knowing that it contained misrepresentations of the status of the child.
When asked for a report on the investigations, one CFSA official told us in writing
that we would get a summary report. Later, when asked again, we were told that such
reports are not provided for “unfounded cases.” However, the suspected abuser father
received not just one, but three different reports – including one faxed to him at 6:30pm
in the evening from CFSA’s offices. Those reports were never forwarded to the
mother.
6
in what appears to me to be a wholesale cover-up, CFSA refused to provide
copies of any documents in response to a FOIA request, including even documents it
had filed publicly, documents it had previously exchanged with the abusing Father and
his counsel, and as well as those it had exchanged with the mother and her counsel.
No attempt was made to even provide a Vaughn index, nor redacted versions of the
documents – even though required by law for documents even when they contain FOIA
exempt information. Furthermore, given that CFSA’s FOIA statistics from the City’s
Secretaries office indicate that a complete denial of a FOIA request by CFSA is rare
[none out of 19 FOIA requests in FY2009 were denied in whole]1 – it only adds to
further evidence that CFSA is attempting to cover up the corruption in its ranks.
1 Annual Freedom of Information Act Report for Fiscal Year 2009 , October 1, 2008through September 30, 2009, from DC Secretary Website.
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
6/7
/05
9/7
/05
12/7
/05
3/7
/06
6/7
/06
9/7
/06
12/7
/06
3/7
/07
6/7
/07
9/7
/07
12/7
/07
3/7
/08
6/7
/08
9/7
/08
12/7
/08
3/7
/09
6/7
/09
9/7
/09
12/7
/09
AN
C C
ounts
-N
eutr
open
ia
Vac
inat
e
AN
C:
WBC(n
utr
ophil)
(10)
GC
SF
Adm
inis
tere
d fo
r D
enta
l Wor
k
Pediatric Hematological-Oncological Outpatient Dept. Day Unit Roof Terrace Ward 64a Ward 62 Tel. +49-511-532-3214 Tel. +49-511-532-9188 Tel. +49-511-532-3288 Tel. +49-511-9411
T R A N S L A T I O N
Am Neuen Garten 4 14469 Potsdam Germany
Medical School Hanover, Germany
Lower Saxony Professorship – 65 plus Research Prof. Karl H. Welte, Dr. med., Director, Department of Molecular Hemopoiesis Center for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine OE 6790 Phone +49-(0)511-532-6710 Fax +49-(0)511-532-6998 [email protected] Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1 30625 Hanover, Germany www.mh-hannover.de
31 August 2009
Medical Opinion
Dear This report deals with the abovementioned patient whose mother accompanied by
with medical records consulted us on 31 August 2009. Unfortunately the child is at present in the USA so that we were unable to examine her in person. On the basis of the medical documents produced we have arrived at the following evaluation: Diagnoses:
• Severe chronic neutropenia of unknown origin, no exclusion of a mutation in the genes ELA2/HAX1/SBDS
• To date no indication of an antibody-induced immune neutropenia
• To date no therapy with hematapoietic growth factors
Case history (Anamnesis): For the detailed anamnesis you are referred to the numerous records. According to information provided by the mother, the child developed normally relative to its age until May 2008. There was no unusual increase of infections. In a hemogram during a routine check-up, the primary care physician discovered the neutropenia which was subsequently confirmed. At the time the child was without infection, and there was no indication of an underlying primary disease. The absolute neutrophil count in the majority of findings was under 500/µl. Further diagnostic investigations to clarify the cause of the severe neutropenia with continuous absolute neutrophil counts under 500/µl were only undertaken in July 2009 at the Georgetown
Pediatric Hematological-Oncological Outpatient Dept. Day Unit Roof Terrace Ward 64a Ward 62 Tel. +49-511-532-3214 Tel. +49-511-532-9188 Tel. +49-511-532-3288 Tel. +49-511-9411
University Hospital, Washington, by Dr Myers. There was no sign of maturation arrest of granulopoesis as an indication of a congenital neutropenia. At the same time there was no evidence of a malignant systemic disease. Taking the bone marrow findings and the persisting severe neutropenia together, the most likely assumption is a bone marrow disease caused by an infection or induced by toxic agents. Recommendations:
s suffering from a severe chronic neutropenia of hitherto unknown origin. In view of the fact that a chronic neutropenia with absolute neutrophil counts of under 500/µl involves the risk of a life-threatening infection, treatment with the hematapoietic growth factor G-CSF, e.g. Filgrastim, should be initiated urgently. In view of the unknown origin of the neutropenia we recommend that the diagnostic investigation be continued in order to exclude an autoimmune disease, an infectious disease and a malignant systemic disease. Independent of this we recommend that a bone marrow screening with histology and cytogenetics be repeated in approx. one year. A conclusive assessment is only possible after personal consultation with the child. Yours etc. [signature] Prof. Karl Welte, Dr. med. Co-Director SCNIR (Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry)
KING APP - 50 (FOIA DC Superior Court)
U nauthorized H and W ritten R eport P rovided to S uspect Father a t F irst E ncounter of Investigation in April 2009
)
ALM
ALM
ALM
ALM
ALM
ALM
ALM
)
KING APP - 55 ( )
ALM
)
ALM
)
ALM
)