Test of Electromagnetic Calorimeter modules for HADES, Mainz Sep.2009
description
Transcript of Test of Electromagnetic Calorimeter modules for HADES, Mainz Sep.2009
Test of Electromagnetic Calorimeter modules for HADES, Mainz Sep.2009
A. Krása, F. Křížek, J. Pietraszko, Y. Sobolev, J. Stanislav, A. Reshetin,
P. Tlustý• purpose: measure the energy resolution of detector modules with various configurations in g beam at energy 0-1500 MeV • test conditions and setup• results
Test conditions
2 days of measurement:1) Ee- = 855 MeV, Ig = 25 kHz2) Ee- = 1508 MeV, Ig = 5 kHz
Beam: - detectors were positioned in the secondary gamma beam with continuous energy distribution from 0 to primary electron beam energy, with intensity exponentially falling with increasing energy - unless stated otherwise, the detectors were hit in the centre of their front side, and the beam proceeded along their longitudinal axis - beam diameter at detector position – 6 mm diameter
Trigger: OR of signals from 8 selected scintillators in electron tagger – giving events with 8 known gamma energies in range from 0 to energy of the electron beam
Detector modules number lightguide,
wrappingglass wrapping PMT
1 lead glass, mylar mylar EMI9903KB
2 lead glass, paper paper EMI9903KB
3 NO mylar EMI9903KB
4 NO paper EMI9903KB
5 NO mylar HAMAMATSU1949
EMI9903KB: 1.5” tube from MIRAC (WA98)H1949: 2.5” tube from HADES Tofino
Lead glass dimensions: 9.2 x 9.2 x 42 cm
Setup
Trigger: OR of signals from 8 selected scintillators in electron tagger – giving events with 8 known gamma energies in range from 0 to energy of the electron beam
Beam: detectors were positioned in the secondary gamma beam with continuous energy (intensity exponentially falling with increasing energy)
Setup
Left up: test setupLeft down: crewRight: detail with detectors, movable table and beam halo (looking in beam direction)
Results slide
No.1) Example of ADC spectra for Ee- = 1508 MeV, module No.1 72) Energy resolution for run Ee- = 855 MeV 83) Energy resolution for run Ee- = 1508 MeV 94) Energy resolution for run Ee- = 855, 1508 MeV and cosmics for modules No.1-5 10-145) Energy resolution as a function of HV 156) Energy resolution as a function of beam position 167) Energy resolution as a function of beam intensity 17
Measured g spectra ALL E= 1399MeV E= 1210MeV
E= 1021MeV E= 831MeV E= 676MeV
E= 261MeV E= 452MeV E= 72.1MeV
Ee=1508 MeV, g energy spread <= 1%, det. module No.1
ADC channel
coun
ts
Resolution vs. Energy Ee= 855 MeV
resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)
Resolution vs. Energy Ee= 1508 MeV
resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)
Resolution vs. Energy Module No.1
resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)
LE: Ee= 855 MeVHE: Ee= 1508 MeVcosmics: cosmics muons
Resolution vs. Energy Module No.2
resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)
LE: Ee= 855 MeVHE: Ee= 1508 MeVcosmics: cosmics muons
Resolution vs. Energy Module No.3
resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)
LE: Ee= 855 MeVHE: Ee= 1508 MeVcosmics: cosmics muons
Resolution vs. Energy Module No.4
LE: Ee= 855 MeVHE: Ee= 1508 MeVcosmics: cosmics muons
resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)
Resolution vs. Energy Module No.5
LE: Ee= 855 MeVHE: Ee= 1508 MeVcosmics: cosmics muons
resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)
Resolution vs. HV Ee= 1508 MeV, module No.1
resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)
Resolution vs. beam position
reading only module No.1
reading modules No.1+2
Ee= 855 MeV, module No.1
No.1 No.2
01234
Res. vs. amp. gain and beam intensity
Ee= 1508 MeV, module No.5
resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)
a) change of AMP gain – no influenceb) decrease of g beam int. from 25kHz to 5kHz – improvement of resolution by 9%
amplifier saturation