Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

27
Test 1: Co- channel interference at the mobile un it

Transcript of Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Page 1: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit

Page 2: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Test 2: Co-channel interference at the cell site

Page 3: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Lowering the Antenna Height

(a) on a high hill

(b) in a valley

Page 4: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

In a Forested Area

Page 5: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Reduction of Co-channel interference in a cellular mobile system

• Increasing the separation between two co-channel cells

• Using directional antennas at the base station

• Lowering the antenna heights at the base station.

Page 6: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Reduction of Co-channel Interference by Means of a Notch in the Tilted Antenna Pattern 

A seven-cell cellular configuration

Page 7: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Antenna Pattern

Vertical Beamwidth

Horizontal Beamwidth

33°,45°,65°,85°

Page 8: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

A typical pattern for a directional antenna of 120° beamwidth 

(a) Azimuthal pattern of 8-dBdirectional  antenna

Page 9: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

A typical pattern for a directional antenna of 120° beamwidth 

(b) Vertical pattern of 8-dB directional antenna

Page 10: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Antenna Tilting

• In general, the vertical pattern of an antenna radiates the main energy towards the horizon

• Only that part of the energy which is radiated below the horizon can be used for the coverage of the sector

• Downtilting the antenna limits the range by reducing the field strength in the horizon

Page 11: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Mechanical Downtilting

Page 12: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Mechanical Downtilt

Page 13: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Mechanical Downtilt

Page 14: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

The Effect of Mechanically Downtilting Antenna on the Coverage Pattern

Vertical antenna pattern of a 120° directional antenna

Page 15: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Notch appearing in tilted antenna pattern

Page 16: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Mechanical Downtilting

• is the down tilt angle• d1 is the length of the upper

antenna-mounting arm• d2 is the length of the lower

antenna-mounting arm• h is the distance between d1

and d2

Page 17: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Antenna ParametersMechanical Downtilt  Electrical Downtilt

• HBW gets bigger

• Causes gain reduction

• HBW remains the same

• But can’t adjust downtilt (fixed)

Page 18: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Suggested Method for Reducing Interference

Page 19: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.

Umbrella-pattern Effect

• Antenna in which the waves are guided downward in all directions from a central pole or tower to the ground, somewhat like the ribs of an open umbrella.

Page 20: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.
Page 21: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.
Page 22: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.
Page 23: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.
Page 24: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.
Page 25: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.
Page 26: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.
Page 27: Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit.