Ten-Year Site Plan€¦ · The OST vision for this TYSP is to reach stable and incremental...

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

OFFICE OF SECURE TRANSPORTATION

Ten-Year Site Plan

FY 2011 through FY 2020

NOTICE

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe on privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, or manufacturer does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

REQUIREMENT

This Ten-Year Site Plan (TYSP) was prepared to address the requirements as specified by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) O 430.1B (Real Property Asset Management) in conformance with the TYSP Guidance dated January 2010. Budget data presented in the Plan is estimated based upon Office of Secure Transportation facilities budget targets.

OST Ten-Year Site Plan

OST_TYSP2011-2020_07052010 Office of Secure Transportation i Ten-Year Site Plan

Table of Contents

3.0 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 1

3.1 Assumptions ........................................................................................................................ 1

3.2 Current State of Site ............................................................................................................ 2

3.3 Changes from Prior Year TYSP ......................................................................................... 2

3.4 Real Property Asset Management ....................................................................................... 3

3.5 Site Project Prioritization and Cost Profile ......................................................................... 4

3.6 Energy Management Plan ................................................................................................... 5

Appendix A: List of Acronyms ............................................................................................... A-1

Appendix B: DOE Order 430.2B – Goals Summary Table .................................................... B-1

Appendix C: Attachments ....................................................................................................... C-1

Appendix D: OST Facility Project Planning Process Flowchart ............................................ D-1


OST_TYSP2011-2020_07052010 Office of Secure Transportation 1 Ten-Year Site Plan

3.0 Overview

The mission of the Office of Secure Transportation (OST) is to provide safe and secure ground and air transportation of nuclear weapons, nuclear weapon components, and special nuclear materials, and also conduct other missions supporting the national security of the United States of America. OST operates a number of specialized vehicles and aircraft for safe and secure transportation of cargo. Highly trained OST Federal Agents (FA) escort these cargo shipments.

The OST vision for this TYSP is to reach stable and incremental increases in funding in order for the Secure Transportation Assets to effectively meet its planned mission capability with essential facility assets and optimize maintenance funding levels.

The OST, NA-15, TYSP discusses the operational, training, and administrative facility requirements to support its FA force. The OST TYSP also supports the NNSA Strategic Plan and is consistent with the FY 2011 through FY 2015 President’s budget.

This TYSP provides data on existing facility and infrastructure assets and identifies required projects and associated costs. Another objective of this TYSP is to identify deferred maintenance reduction costs. OST facilities are spread between several sites in the states of Tennessee, New Mexico, Texas, Arkansas, Idaho, Maryland, Missouri, and South Carolina. The OST facilities located in Texas are addressed in the Pantex Site Office submission of their TYSP. Those OST facilities are mentioned within this TYSP for illustrative and OST-funding planning purposes.

OST is undertaking a proactive approach in completely synchronizing all Facilities Information Management System (FIMS) data for each real property asset managed and reported in this TYSP update. Extensive accomplishments have been made in this area with additional efforts required and on-going.

OST is not sufficiently funded to address all facility needs. Deferred maintenance levels are continuing to increase.

3.1 Assumptions

The OST TYSP was developed relative to the following information and assumptions. Mission operations performed at each command are done in a safe and effective manner. Facilities provided are adequate for OST personnel.

OST operations require technical and logistical support assets for implementation of policies governing operation of equipment as well as the controls necessary for managing property. That property includes firearms, ammunition, tactical equipment and vehicles. The information in this TYSP is at a high level and does not address each site in detail.

Funds associated with Readiness in Technical Base and Facilities (RTBF) or other programs have NOT been made available to OST.

According to the Operations and Maintenance Benchmarks, Research Report #30, published in 2008 by the International Facility Management Association (IFMA), the total maintenance cost for a multi-use facility is $2.03 per square foot. The mean cost for maintenance published by the same organization is $2.00 a square foot. The higher of the two values was used and inflated by



6 percent to adjust the value to 2008 dollars and calculate the annual operation maintenance cost. This inflated amount is $2.15 per square foot. Inflation factors are included per fiscal year as noted in the TYSP 2009 Guidance for all OST managed facilities. Given the overall condition of ageing facilities, this inflation rate does not include any un-programmed or anticipated equipment failures. Presently, OST is barely keeping pace with current maintenance requirements. As a result, deferred maintenance growth will increase overall future maintenance expenditures.

OST does not possess a formal Condition Assessment Survey (CAS) Program that calculates a Facility Condition Index (FCI) figure by building or by site. OST does have a site condition assessment index rating of buildings taken in 2004. Until a formal CAS can be performed, this index rating serves as the basis for calculating maintenance.

Complex Transformation was reviewed; however, OST does not have significant facilities to consolidate with the exception of those facilities scheduled for demolition (Coronado Club, [Building 3210] and six modular buildings, T-60, T-61, T-62, T-66, T-67, and T-67A).

3.2 Current State of Site

The work requirements for the secure transportation are anticipated to continue increasing to support the dismantlement and maintenance schedule of the nuclear weapons stockpile and the consolidation of the storage of nuclear material. The challenge to increase the capacity of the program is coupled with the impacted national security concerns and the threat environment. The overall mission requirements have necessitated OST to increase the number of Agents. Currently, OST is staffed at 95 percent of authorized Agent ceiling. In order to provide appropriate space for these Agents and support staff, OST completed between 2007 and 2008 Federal Agent Facilities (FAF) at the Eastern, Central and Western Commands. These facilities were funded from OST program dollars, a significant accomplishment given growing mission requirements. Sustainment funding is now needed to keep all facilities mission ready. The addition of the proposed Agent Operations Western Command (AOWC) VMF/MEMF, as well as renovating training facilities as identified in Attachment A-5, will increase our training capabilities. This will avoid significant travel expenses; loss of personnel time, and improve the Agent quality of life.

OST facilities currently occupy 433,388 GSF. Leased space occupies 155,357 GSF. The total GSF will be reduced by 43,053 GSF from the demolition of the Coronado Club (Building 3210) and six modular buildings, T-60, T-61, T-62, T-66, T-67, and T-67A. The demolition of the Coronado Club building is scheduled for 2012, or as soon as funding is available.

Another OST accomplishment in FY2009 was the completion of the construction of the Agent Operations Eastern Command (AOEC) Physical Training and Intermediate Use of Force (PT/IUF) building.

3.3 Changes from Prior Year TYSP

Equipment Consolidation Site 15 (ECS 15) consisting of a warehouse and office/maintenance building of approximately 100,000 GSF was eliminated as a planned asset. Area 12 of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) was utilized previously for training exercises, but will not be used in the future after the 2010 Operational Readiness Training (ORT) exercise. Current NTS mission



operating costs for FY2010 are $3M. Due to the decision not to use Area 12 of NTS in the future, any cost savings realized in FY2010 will be reviewed for possible facilities projects supporting the OST Training Command at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas. Future construction projects and their corresponding costs are under consideration.

Additionally, OST previously identified the plan to relocate the OST Headquarters into the Albuquerque Transportation and Technology Center (ATTC), a General Services Administration (GSA) lease from a private developer. This project was eliminated from the TYSP and reduces the planned addition of 275,000 GSF. A tornado safe building was completed in 2009 and is available for emergency use by Training Command (TRACOM) personnel. Completion of the AOEC PT/IUF facility occurred in 2009 and is currently being utilized. The AOEC Haul Road reconfiguration was eliminated from previous submission.

Issues and Concerns

The OST submitted a Facilities Infrastructure Management Plan on September 20, 2007, to propose a plan to address the need for a formal facilities condition assessment, preventative maintenance program and Life-Cycle Replacement Plan for major systems. The original proposed schedule for correcting these deficiencies and implementing the plan was to begin by the end of FY2009. It included appropriate site level staff, appropriate levels of funding to address deferred maintenance, and sustainment of operations and maintenance identified and prioritized. However, OST to date has not received any funding to implement the plan.

As noted previously, OST constructed a FAF at the Eastern, Central and Western Commands which were funded from OST program dollars. A significant issue for OST is to receive adequate sustainment funding to keep all facilities mission ready.

3.4 Real Property Asset Management

OST has three Agent Operations Commands and a training command. These are known as the Eastern Command in Tennessee; Central Command in Texas; and Western Command in New Mexico. TRACOM is located in Arkansas. OST has five relay stations located in sites previously identified in the Section 3.0 - Overview. Facilities at each Command differ in form, but requirements dictate they share the same functional capabilities. Some buildings are not functionally optimal for the OST mission because they were designed to the original facility owner’s requirements. OST’s process of managing the real property assets can be described as a critical system, important systems, and balance of plant prioritized method. Consideration of life-cycle replacement decisions is not yet feasible due to funding limitations. Prescribed projects are required for the growth of the mission and demonstrate proper stewardship of government assets.

Site Footprint Management / Excess Facilities Disposition

Building requirements are reflected in Attachment A-5 (Other Facilities and Infrastructure Cost Project Spreadsheet).

Excess facilities deposition includes the planned demolition of the Coronado Club (Building 3210) and six modular buildings, T-60, T-61, T-62, T-66, T-67, and T-67A. These buildings are scheduled for demolition in 2012, or as soon as funding is available.



Future Space Needs

Future improvements combine remodeling with new construction. Planned remodeling projects for the existing FAF program wide will expand training and other support capabilities by providing space for physical fitness and testing, an intermediate use of force training gym, and classrooms.

OST is currently preparing a Line Item CD0/1 funding request package to construct an updated and collocated VMF/MEMF at the current AOWC compound. The mission impact, if this is not funded, will result in inefficiencies and possible delays in mission launch. The Agents and mission vehicles are currently at two different locations. Optimum operations would dictate Agents and vehicles be collocated.

Requirements for physical fitness facilities at the AOWC and AOCC were reviewed with respective command staff and resulting projects are shown in Attachment A-5 (Other Facilities and Infrastructure Cost Project Spreadsheet).

Future submissions of the TYSP will include OST’s strategic planning decisions.

Based on the anticipated OST program mission expansion, OST has been exempt from the requirement of the “space bank” offset for new construction and expects this practice to continue.

Deferred Maintenance Reduction / Facility Condition

OST does not possess a formal Condition Assessment Survey (CAS) and currently does not have funding to maintain a Facility Condition Index (FCI) for mission critical facilities for the required 5 percent. Smaller projects have and will continue to be accomplished in an attempt to attain the required deferred maintenance reduction.

OST is continually reviewing financial options to understand and meet the challenge of reducing the deferred maintenance growth. Overall increased funding from multiple funding sources may be required. Based on current funding, OST is in a RUN-TO-FAIL position (except for critical systems).

Total deferred maintenance for FY2011 is $28M. (See Attachment F-2 for detail.)

Facilities Information Management System (FIMS)

The presented data in this TYSP is not synchronized with current OST FIMS data. Some progress was made in addressing FIMS redundancies; however, additional efforts are planned in FY2010 and will continue on an on-going basis as funding is identified.

3.5 Site Project Prioritization and Cost Profile

OST plans and prioritizes their facilities projects according to critical mission need, age and condition of facilities, and available funding. OST obtains mission and support requirements from the different Commands, reviews assets capabilities and capacities of current assets, and makes the determination if new facilities are warranted. OST prioritizes a list of specific actions or construction projects which includes associated funding strategies. In the event of a budget shortfall, OST reprioritizes the project list to fund critical and essential projects only. All other projects are postponed or cancelled and building maintenance is deferred. In some cases,



projects must be added mid year due to immediate mission needs causing other planned projects to be delayed or cancelled.

To document projects over $10K and initiate the request, a formal documentation process is used to define the scope and justification. The process sets a definitive scope and identifies tasks and authorities having jurisdiction over activities required to implement the plan. Activities include generating spend plans, project cost parameters, estimates, budget status, and the identification of regulatory requirements. The process is implemented using an “OST workbook” that maps the process and centralizes documentation of project information and is authorized by the Command Director. The project is then authorized by the OST senior staff up to $10M. Projects greater than $10M go to the Energy Systems Acquisition Advisory Board (ESAAB) for approval (DOE Order 413.3B). In previous discussions, the ESAAB process was delegated to the OST Assistant Deputy Administrator. (See Appendix D: OST Facility Project Planning Process for a flowchart of this process.)

Cost profiles are located in Attachment A-5 (Other Facilities and Infrastructure Cost Project Spreadsheet).

Funding continues to be a challenge for OST key projects.

3.6 Energy Management Plan

OST reported in the December 2009 Energy Management Plan the status and progress of meeting the goals of DOE O 430.2B. OST will be successful in meeting the 30 percent energy intensity goal by FY2015 based on the FY2003 baseline. Additionally, OST plans to meet petroleum and fleet reduction goals, alternative fuel goals, and advanced metering goals to the extent possible. OST plans to install high-efficiency fixtures to support the 16 percent water intensity reduction goal and is currently identifying Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design - Existing Building (LEED-EB) certifiable candidates. Significant progress has been made to reduce OST’s energy footprint and plans are in place to comply or exceed the DOE O 430-2B goals to the extent practicable and funding is available.


OST_TYSP2011-2020_07052010 Office of Secure Transportation A-1 Ten-Year Site Plan

Appendix A: List of Acronyms

AOCC Agent Operations Central Command

AOEC Agent Operations Eastern Command

AOWC Agent Operations Western Command

ATTC Albuquerque Transportation and Technology Center

CAS Condition Assessment Survey

DOE Department of Energy

ECS Equipment Consolidation Site

ESAAB Energy Systems Acquisition Advisory Board

FAF Federal Agent Facility

FCI Facility Condition Index

FIMS Facilities Information Management System

FIRP Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization Program

FY Fiscal Year

GSA General Services Administration

GSF Gross Square Feet

HPSB High Performance and Sustainable Building

IFMA International Facility Management Association

LEED-EB Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design – Existing Building

MEMF Mobile Electronic Maintenance Facility

NNSA National Nuclear Security Administration

NTS Nevada Test Site

ORT Operational Readiness Training

OST Office of Secure Transportation

PT/IUF Physical Training / Intermediate Use of Force

RTBF Readiness in Technical Base and Facilities

TRACOM Training Command

TYSP Ten-Year Site Plan

VMF Vehicle Maintenance Facility


OST_TYSP2011-2020_07052010 Office of Secure Transportation B-1 Ten-Year Site Plan

Appendix B: DOE Order 430.2B – Goals Summary Table

Goal Status and Plans

30% energy intensity reduction by FY2015 from a FY2003 baseline

OST will exceed the goal by FY2015 with a projected 32.9 percent energy intensity reduction. Overall percentage is supported primarily by decommissioning buildings.

16% water intensity reduction by FY2015 from a FY2007 baseline

OST cannot measure water intensity until meters are installed to measure water usage. A plan is in place to install high-efficiency fixtures to support meeting this goal.

7.5% of a site’s annual electricity consumption from onsite renewable sources by FY2010

Renewable options are limited and OST cannot currently fulfill requirements. A plan is in place to install photovoltaic street and area lamps at each OST site in FY2011. OST will install two solar heating panels at Eastern Command.

Every site to have a least one onsite renewable energy generating system

OST does not currently have any onsite renewable energy generating systems. It is not feasible at this time to meet the renewable energy goals due to budget constraints.

10% annual increase in fleet alternative fuel consumption relative to a FY2005 baseline

OST projects meeting this goal based on the purchasing of flex-fuel vehicles and utilization of alternative fuels. OST plans to meet or exceed this goal through FY2015. OST is in the process of providing additional details to HQ.

2% annual reduction in fleet petroleum consumption relative to a FY2005 baseline

OST projects meeting this goal by FY2015 utilizing the reduction in fleet size, purchasing of flex-fuel vehicles, using E85 fuel, and in-house conservation measures. OST is in the process of providing additional details to HQ.

75% of light duty vehicle purchases must consist of alternative fuel vehicles

OST plans to exceed this goal by FY2015 through fleet management and replacement of existing vehicles with flex-fuel vehicles. OST is in the process of providing additional details to HQ.

All new construction and major renovations greater than $5 million to be LEED Gold certified

OST has no existing plans for new construction or renovations greater than $5 million. All future approved projects will meet LEED standards provided adequate funding is available.


OST_TYSP2011-2020_07052010 Office of Secure Transportation B-2 Ten-Year Site Plan

Goal Status and Plans

15% of existing building to be compliant with the five guiding principles of (HPSB) design

OST has identified 19 percent of total GSF as candidates for LEED-EB certification. These buildings have not yet been evaluated to determine if they meet the guidelines of HPSB.

Advanced metering to the maximum extent practicable

OST has minimal advanced metering. A plan is in place to install advanced electric meters beginning in FY2010 in order to measure utility usage. Other metering will begin in FY2011.


OST_TYSP2011-2020_07052010 Office of Secure Transportation C-1 Ten-Year Site Plan

Appendix C: Attachments

1. Attachment A-1: Line Items N/A

2. Attachment A-2: Proposed Line Item Cost Projection Spreadsheet

3. Attachment A-3: RTBF / Operations of Facilities N/A

4. Attachment A-4: NNSA Facilities and Infrastructure cost Projection Spreadsheet for FIRP. N/A

5. Attachment A-5: Other Facilities and Infrastructure

6. Attachment A-6A: FY2010 – FY2012 currently funded security infrastructure cost projection spreadsheet. N/A

7. Attachment A-6B: FY2011 – FY2012 unfunded security infrastructure cost projection spreadsheet. N/A

8. Attachment E-1: Facilities Disposition Plan

9. Attachment E-2: New Construction Footprint Added

10. Attachment E-3: FY2010 Leased Space

11. Attachment E-4A: Footprint Summary River Graph

12. Attachment E-4B: Footprint Summary Spreadsheet

13. Attachment F-1: FIRP Legacy (FY2003 & FY2004) Deferred Maintenance Baseline Reduction Spreadsheet. N/A

14. Attachment F-2: NNSA Total Deferred Maintenance and Projected Deferred Maintenance Reduction Spreadsheet. (Non FIRP)


OST_TYSP2011-2020_07052010 Office of Secure Transportation D-1 Ten-Year Site Plan

Appendix D: OST Facility Project Planning Process Flowchart

(Project Cost >$10M)

Limited FY 2011 TYSP Guidance

Priority (1)

Project Name

(2)

Project Number (3)

Deferred Maintenance

Identifier(s) (3a)

Mission Dependency

(4)

Mission Dependency

Program(4a)

Deferred Maintenance Reduction (5)

GSF Added or Eliminated

(6)

Funding Type

(7)

Total (8)

FY 2010 (9)

FYNSP FY 2011 (10)

FYNSP FY 2012

(11)

FYNSP FY 2013

(12)

FYNSP FY 2014

(13)

FYNSP FY 2015

(14)

FY 2016 (15)

FY 2017 (16)

FY 2018 (17)

FY 2019 (18)

FY 2020 (19)

OPCPE&D

LITotal (TPC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

OPCPE&D

LITotal (TPC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

OPCPE&D

LITotal (TPC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

OPCPE&D

LI 18000 18000Total (TPC) 18000 0 0 0 0 0 18000 0 0 0 0 0

OPCPE&D

LITotal (TPC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

18000 0 0 0 0 0 18000 0 0 0 0 0

OPCPE&D

LITotal (TPC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

OPCPE&D

LITotal (TPC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

18000 0 0 0 0 0 18000 0 0Note: The purpose of this spreadsheet is to allow each Site to propose/forecast additional high-priority NNSA line item construction projects for Headquarters consideration, if applicable. Sites may propose projects that are above their FYNSP constraints. However, there must be a recognition that budget realities, program priorities, and other factors will necessarily limit/dictate which projects ultimately receive funding. Each site may also list its proposed Non-NNSA Program line item projects by program.

E. Nuclear Nonproliferation (NN) Line Items

Total Costs for All NNSA Site Line Items

Total Costs for Program A

Total Site Costs

F. Non-NNSA Line Items Program A

G. Non-NNSA Line Items Program B

Attachment A-2Facilities and Infrastructure Cost Projection Spreadsheet

Proposed Line Item Projects for Office of Secure Transportation($000s)

A. Readiness in Technical Base and Facilities (RTBF) Line Items

B. Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization Program (FIRP) Line Items

1

C. Safeguards & Security (S&S) Line Items

D. Other Defense Programs Line Items (for example, Campaigns/Directed Stockpile Work (DSW))

ADDED 36,000

STAAOWC VMF/ MEMF Bldg

MC

Total Costs for Program B

NNSA Limited FY 2011 TYSP Guidance

Priority (1)

COMMAND Project Number (3)

Mission Dependency

(4)

Mission Dependency

Program(4a)

Deferred Maintenance Reduction (5)

GSF Added or Eliminated

(6)

Funding Type (7)

Total (8) Prior Years'

Funding (9)

FY 2011 FYNSP

(10)

FY2012 FYNSP

(11)

FY2013 FYNSP

(12)

FY 2014 FYNSP (13)

FY 2015 FYNSP (14)

FY 2016 (15)

FY 2017 (16) FY 2018 (17) FY 2019 (18) FY 2020 (19)

Facility and Infrastructure Management Plan Implementation (HQ Approved 2007) ALL 600Energy Management Upgrades per Executive Order 13423 ALL 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100OST Relay Stations Condition Assessment (Deferred/Preventative/Predictive/Corrective) Maintenance ALL 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

Remodel Bldg 16-2 (Admin., Classrooms)-PHASE I AOCC 350Remodel Bldg 16-2 for Operations Use-PHASE II AOCC 350Hail Canopy (Metal) for Operation Vehicles AOCC 1,000POV Parking Lot Upgrades (Patch/Seal/Stripe) AOCC 150Design/Construct PT/IUF Building (OB2) AOCC 10,000 1,000Indoor Shooting Range-Design AOCC 500Indoor Shooting Range-Construction (80'x170') AOCC 14,000 3,000

VMF HVAC Replacement-IN PROCESS FUNDED FY09 AOEC Replace Fuel Storage Tanks-IN PROCESS FUNDED FY09 AOECMulti-Use Obstacle/Leadership Course Construction AOEC 100Construct a Firing Line Ready Area Cover for Range 1 & 2 AOEC 50Install Stranded Barbed Wire around Ops Area to Designate new 229 Boundary AOEC 20Install Infrastructure for MOUT Site AOEC 10Equipment Sheds for STC and Training Facilities AOEC 50Back Up Generator and Busing for STC/VMF-Procure and Install AOEC 150Expand STC Locker Room Facility AOEC 600Range Classroom Facility Construction AOEC 2,000 300Pave Flannigan Loop Road AOEC 500Escort Vehicle Parking Lot Expansion within Limited Area AOEC 60Install Smart Meters (Electric, Natural Gas, and Water) EO 13423 AOEC 50 50 50 50Condition Assessment Maintenance Requirements (Deferred Maintenance) AOEC 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Condition Assessment Maintenance Requirements (Corrective/Preventive/Predictive Maintenance) AOEC 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75*Haul Road Reconfiguration AOEC

2nd Planner VT-COMPLETED FUNDED FY09 AOWCOperations Trailer Ready Line T-bars-IN PROCESS FUNDED FY09 AOWC Equipment Table/Luggage Canopy/Walk Way AOWC 200POV Security Fence/ Visitor-Employee-Handicap Parking Area Striping AOWC 150VMF and MEMF Planning/Engineering/Design (PED)- Pending Decision on TRACOM Analysis AOWC 500M60 Range (1000m) Improvements (Storage Shed/Firing Positions)-Phase I AOWC 150 Reconstruct Tactical Training Area (Demo/Infrastructure Upgrade)-Phase I AOWC 100 M60 Range (1000m) Improvements (Bleachers/Canopy/Work Surface Area)-Phase II AOWC 100Build VMF/MEMF Building AOWC 36,000 18,000Reconstruct Tactical Training Area (Bleachers/Canopy/Work Surface Area)-Phase II AOWC 100 Build PT/IUF Building- Pending Decision on TRACOM Analysis AOWC 10,000 2,000Build New FAF- Pending Decision on TRACOM Analysis AOWC 25,000 7,000Military Operation on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT) Construction AOWC 500Install Smart Meters (Electric, Natural Gas, and Water) EO 13423 50 50 50 50

Demolition of Coronado Club HQ/AL -35,000Missouri Relay Station Generator Replacement HQ/AL 100Replace NM Relay Station Building HQ/AL 200Demolition of Old Western Command HQ/AL -11,000 1,000FMB Technical Support Services Contractor/TYSP HQ/AL 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250Energy Compliance Engineering Services HQ/AL 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75FIMS/CAIS Support HQ/AL 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Administrative Staff Offices for OST's Munitions Management Program (1600g.s.f; ~5 FTEs) HQ/AL

Upgrade ECC- (Starting 24 Mar 2008)-COMPLETED FUNDED FY09 TRACOMExpand Armory (1789)-COMPLETED FUNDED FY09 TRACOMMetal Roof Campus Bldg's (1756, 1794, 1795) COMPLETED UNDER ISSA-FY09 TRACOM Phase I 2034 Electric/Sprinkler Upgrade- (Electric completed-$40k/Sprinkler Supply Line Pending) TRACOM 40Demolish/Replace Buildings. 2025, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2032-Workbook Needed TRACOM 150Erect Canopy for Range 11 Firing Positions (Material Procured) TRACOM 50Install Vinyl Windows Building 1794, 1795 TRACOM 30Insulate/Remodel Classroom 2/ Expand IT 1787 (Sustainability Project-$32K) TRACOM 32 60Construct VMF Expansion TRACOM 5,000 300Expand Phone Room 1787 TRACOM 3,000 50Expand PTF Building by 40'x70' Northward TRACOM 275Install Generator for Data Center/Classroom 2 (1787)/Phone Room TRACOM 50Build All-Weather Running Track North of 1779 TRACOM 350Install Smart Meters (Electric, Natural Gas, and Water) EO 13423 TRACOM 50 50 50 50Condition Assessment Maintenance Requirements (Deferred Maintenance) TRACOM 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Condition Assessment Maintenance Requirements (Corrective/Preventive/Predictive Maintenance) TRACOM 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150Lease 2000 Area TRACOM 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

*** *notes changes from prior OST TYSP

- - 7,442 4,085 13,550 1,100 1,450 18,950 950 950 950 950

1

- - - - - - - - - - -

1

- - - - - - - - - - -

1

- - - - - - - - - - -

Attachment A-5Other Facilities and Infrastructure Cost Projection Spreadsheet

Office of Secure Transportation($000s)

NNSA Facilities and Infrastructure Cost Projection Spreadsheet (Program A)

NNSA Facilities and Infrastructure Cost Projection Spreadsheet (Program B)

TOTAL Program A (facilities & infrastructure reported under this category)

TOTAL Program D (facilities & infrastructure reported under this category)

Non-NNSA Facilities and Infrastructure Cost Projection Spreadsheet (Program C)

Non-NNSA Facilities and Infrastructure Cost Projection Spreadsheet (Program D)

TOTAL Program B (facilities & infrastructure reported under this category)

TOTAL Program C (facilities & infrastructure reported under this category)

NNSA FY 2011 TYSP Guidance

OST 3210 CORONADO CLUB 29,433 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210A SWIM POOL PUMP CONT RM (CC) 342 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210B SWIM POOL PUMP EQUIP RM (CC) 400 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210C SWIM POOL STORAGE BLDG (CC) 140 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210D STORAGE BUILDING (CORONADO CLUB) 169 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210E STORAGE BUILDING (CORONADO CLUB) 436 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210F STORAGE BUILDING (CORONADO CLUB) 198 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210G STORAGE BUILDING (CORONADO CLUB) 326 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3214 Maintenance Shop (CORONADO CLUB) 3,280 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST T-60 FAFWC MOD T60 1,840 2012 To Be DecommissionedOST T-61 FAFWC MOD T61 1,840 2012 To Be DecommissionedOST T-62 FAFWC MOD T62 1,680 2012 To Be DecommissionedOST T-66 FAFWC MOD T66 1,680 2012 To Be DecommissionedOST T-67 FAFWC MOD T67 1,906 2012 To Be DecommissionedOST T-67A FAFWC MOD T67A 2,026 2012 To Be Decommissioned

Total 0 0 45696 0 0

Yearly S&M Costs

($000s)(13)

Contaminated

(Yes or No)(14)

Notes(15)

Attachment E-1Facilities Disposition Plan

(Within FYNSP/Outyear Planning Targets)

Funding Source

(1)

Facility Identification Number

(FIMS)(2)

Facility Name(3)


Identifier (3a)

Mission Dependency

Program(4)

Priority Score

(5)

Priority Rank

(6)

Legacy Deferred Maintenance

Reduction(FY03 & FY04

Baseline) (7)

Non-Legacy Deferred

Maintenance Reduction

(8)

Gross Square Footage

(gsf)(9)

Excess Year(10)

Estimated Disposition

Year(11)

TEC to Disposition

($000s)(12)

OST 3210 CORONADO CLUB 29,433 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210A SWIM POOL PUMP CONT RM (CC) 342 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210B SWIM POOL PUMP EQUIP RM (CC) 400 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210C SWIM POOL STORAGE BLDG (CC) 140 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210D STORAGE BUILDING (CORONADO CLUB) 169 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210E STORAGE BUILDING (CORONADO CLUB) 436 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210F STORAGE BUILDING (CORONADO CLUB) 198 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3210G STORAGE BUILDING (CORONADO CLUB) 326 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST 3214 Maintenance Shop (CORONADO CLUB) 3,280 2012 To Be Decommissioned

OST T-60 FAFWC MOD T60 1,840 2012 To Be DecommissionedOST T-61 FAFWC MOD T61 1,840 2012 To Be DecommissionedOST T-62 FAFWC MOD T62 1,680 2012 To Be DecommissionedOST T-66 FAFWC MOD T66 1,680 2012 To Be DecommissionedOST T-67 FAFWC MOD T67 1,906 2012 To Be DecommissionedOST T-67A FAFWC MOD T67A 2,026 2012 To Be Decommissioned

Total 0 0 45696 0 0

Contaminated

(Yes or No)(14)

Notes(15)

Attachment E-1Facilities Disposition Plan

(Within FYNSP/Outyear Planning Targets)

Funding Source

(1)

Facility Identification Number

(FIMS)(2)

Facility Name(3)


Identifier (3a)

Mission Dependency

Program(4)

Priority Score

(5)

Priority Rank

(6)

Legacy Deferred Maintenance

Reduction(FY03 & FY04

Baseline) (7)

Non-Legacy Deferred

Maintenance Reduction

(8)

Gross Square Footage

(gsf)(9)

Excess Year(10)

Estimated Disposition

Year(11)

TEC to Disposition

($000s)(12)

Yearly S&M Costs

($000s)(13)

NNSA FY 2011 TYSP Guidance

Funding Source(1)

Project Number

(2)

Facility Name(3)

Mission Dependency Program

(4)

Funding Type(LI, GPP, IGPP)

(5)

Project Area (GSF)

(6)

Year of Beneficial

Occupancy(7)

Notes(8)

NA-10 AOWC VMF/MEMF Bldg MC LI 36,000 2016 CD 0/1NA-10 FAF Building AOWC MC LI 25,000 2013NA-10 PT/IUF Building AOCC MC LI 10,000 2013NA-10 Indoor Shooting Range MC LI 14,000 2013NA-10 VMF Expansion TRACOM MC LI 5000 2011NA-10 Range Classroom Facility (AOCC) MC LI 2000 2011

Total 92,000

Attachment E-2New Construction Footprint Added

# Mission Dependency

Program(4)

Mission Dependency(5)

# Occupants (6)

Gross Square Feet

(7)

Rental Rate per Rentable

s.f.(8)

Annual Cost(9)

Lease Type(10)

Lease Term - yrs.

(11)

Exp. Month /

Year(12)

Renewal Options

(13)

AOWC/HQ875 Annex Motor Pool 10,320 820/SNL Engineering 2,000 20383-1st N Permanent structure, partial occupancy 1,000 20381 -1st Vault Permanent structure, partial occupancy 100 20385- 1st 2nd 3rd Permanent structure, 80% partial occupancy 22,650 20387 Permanent structure 8,842 20397 Permanent structure 177 Mod 18 Modular Bldg 1,860 Mod 17 Modular Bldg 1,860 SC-3 Modular Bldg 2,000 AB481 Permanent structure 20,000 AB480 Permanent structure 3,299

TRACOM1756 Office Space, permanent structure 2,750

1779Office Space/Physical Training/Classroom, permanent structure

8,747 1784 Federal instructor office building, permanent structure 1,750 1785 Contractor office building, permanent structure 1,750 1786 Federal instructor office building, permanent structure 2,270 1794 21 room dormitory, permanent structure 9,040 1795 21 room dormitory, permanent structure 9,040 2033 Chugach/USACE Engineering office/WSI 8,301 2034 Shipping and Receiving Bldg. 8,036

2036Contractor facility maintenance building, permanent structure

9,109 2029 Contractor storage building, permanent structure 1,376 2030 Contractor storage building, permanent structure 2,724 2031 Contractor storage building, permanent structure 3,121 2032 Contractor storage building, permanent structure 8,183 7183 NBC Chamber Building 1,000 7183a Training Building 1,600 7183b Climbing Building 400 7184 Breech Building 2,052

Attachment E-3FY 2010 Leased Space

Office of Secure Transportation

Fiscal Year (1)

Beginning Site Footprint (gsf)

(2)

Excess Facilities Footprint Elimination

(gsf)(3)

New Construction/ Footprint Added (gsf) (4)

Site Footprint Reduction by FY

(gsf) (5)

Footprint "Banked"(gsf) (6)

Waiver/ Transfer (gsf) (7)

“Grandfathered" Footprint Added

(gsf) (8)

Cumulative "Grandfathered" Footprint Added

(gsf) (8a)

NNSA Site Total Footprint (gsf) (9)

NNSA Leased

Space (10)

Weapons Activities

Account (gsf)(11)

FY 2006 Actual 356,110 0 0 0 0 0 0 356,110 158,543 N/A

FY 2007 Actual 356,110 0 12,760 0 0 0 0 368,870 168,543 N/A

FY 2008 368,870 0 52,704 0 0 0 0 421,574 168,543 N/A

FY 2009 421,574 10,000 25,600 0 0 0 0 437,174 158,543 N/A

FY 2010 437,174 3,786 0 0 0 0 0 433,388 158,543 N/A

FY 2011 433,388 43,053 111,459 0 0 0 0 501,794 155,357 N/A

FY 2012 501,794 112,713 18,254 0 0 0 0 407,335 155,357 N/A

FY 2013 407,335 43,053 159,502 0 0 0 0 523,784 155,357 N/A

FY 2014 523,784 127,249 49,000 0 0 0 0 445,535 155,357 N/A

FY 2015 445,535 0 75,849 0 0 0 0 521,384 155,357 N/A

FY 2016 521,384 75,849 36,000 0 0 0 0 481,535 155,357 N/A

FY 2017 481,535 12,320 0 0 0 0 0 469,215 155,357 N/A

FY 2018 469,215 0 0 0 0 0 0 469,215 143,037 N/A

FY 2019 469,215 0 0 0 0 0 0 469,215 143,037 N/A

FY 2020 469,215 0 0 0 0 0 0 469,215 143,037 N/A

Attachment E-4(b)FOOTPRINT TRACKING SUMMARY SPREADSHEET

Office of Secure Transportation 2009 TYSP

FY 2006 Actual

FY 2007 Actual FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020

Beginning Site Footprint (gsf) (2) 356,110 356,110 368,870 421,574 437,174 433,388 501,794 407,335 523,784 445,535 521,384 481,535 469,215 469,215 469,215

Cumulative "Grandfathered" Footprint Added(gsf) (8a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NNSA Leased Space (10) 158,543 168,543 168,543 158,543 158,543 155,357 155,357 155,357 155,357 155,357 155,357 155,357 143,037 143,037 143,037

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

GSF

ATTACHMENT E-4(a)OST TYSP 2011-20 GSF RIVER GRAPH

Site Space Tracking Summary

Category of Maintenance FY 2003(Baseline)

FY 2004(Actual)

FY 2005(Actual)

FY 2006(Actual)

FY 2007(Actual)

FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020

1. ANNUAL REQUIRED MAINTENANCE for F&I 616 641 667 693 721 750 769 788 807 828 848 870 891 914 936 960 984 1,008

2. ANNUAL PLANNED MAINTENANCE TOTAL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a. Direct b. Indirect

3. DEFERRED MAINTENANCE (DM) TOTAL(Excludes Programmatic Real Property or Equipment)= Inflation Prior Year DM Total + DM New - Prior Year DM Reduction 20,220 20,624 21,037 21,458 22,334 23,028 24,475 24,325 28,483 22,724 26,515 26,322 27,287 27,310 27,202 29,049 33,033 33,125 i. Backlog Inflation Rate (%) 2.6% 2.5% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% ii. DM Inflation 581 576 563 559 655 523 610 605 628 628 626 668 760 iii. DM NEW A. DM, Mission-Critical F&I ONLY B. DM, Mission-Dependent, Not Critical F&I ONLY C. DM, Not Mission-Dependent F&I ONLY 21,458 22,334 22,447 23,899 23,762 27,924 25,992 25,992 25,712 26,682 26,682 26,574 28,423 32,365 32,365

4. DEFERRED MAINTENANCE (DM) REDUCTION TOTAL - - - - - - 3,923 - - - - - i. Reduction Total attributed to FIRP ONLY - - - - - - - - A. Reduction in DM for Mission-Critical F&I 1. Reduction attributed to FIRP ONLY

B. Reduction in DM for Mission-Dependent, Not Critical F&I 1. Reduction attributed to FIRP ONLY

C. Reduction in DM for Not Mission-Dependent F&I 3,923 1. Reduction attributed to FIRP ONLY

5. REPLACEMENT PLANT VALUE (RPV) for Facilities and Infrastructure (F&I)= Inflation of PY RPV + Increase or Decrease due to other causes 69,011 71,772 74,643 73,779 83,441 83,818 102,568 102,568 102,568 96,726 96,726 95,027 95,027 95,027 95,027 95,027 95,027 95,027 A. RPV for Mission-Critical F&I ONLY B. RPV for Mission-Dependent, Not Critical F&I C. RPV for Not Mission-Dependent F&I D. RPV Increase from prior year attributed to inflation 2,169 2,095 2,359 2,359 2,359 2,225 2,225 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186 E. RPV Increase / decrease attributed to causes other than inflation (provide separate supporting narrative behind F-2 exhibit)

Attachment F-2Office of Secure Transportation 2011-20 TYSP

Total Deferred Maintenance and Projected Deferred Maintenance Reduction ($000s)

Ten-Year Site Plan€¦ · The OST vision for this TYSP is to reach stable and incremental...

Documents

Transcript of Ten-Year Site Plan€¦ · The OST vision for this TYSP is to reach stable and incremental...