Technical Barriers to Trade in the WTO · on technical barriers to trade than on any ... its object...
Transcript of Technical Barriers to Trade in the WTO · on technical barriers to trade than on any ... its object...
The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade
3MODULE
ESTIMATED TIME: 3 hours
OBJECTIVES OF MODULE 3
Present the background of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade
(TBT Agreement); and
explain the TBT Agreement structure and application.
I. INTRODUCTION
As learn in the previous Module, the multilateral trading system was founded in 1947. In its earliest years, the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which later evolved into the WTO, concentrated on reducing
tariffs and quantitative restrictions.
Soon, however, Contracting Parties recognized that other non-tariff measures needed to be tackled. In
the 1960s, an inventory based on notifications from Contracting Parties revealed that more issues were raised
on technical barriers to trade than on any other category of measures.
This provided the impetus for the first Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, which came into force on a
plurilateral basis in 1980, at the end of the GATT Tokyo Round of trade negotiations (1973-1979). This
agreement will be referred to here as the "Tokyo Round TBT Agreement".
TIP
Please keep in mind that the Tokyo Round TBT Agreement is also known as the "Standards Code".
In 1994, with the creation of the World Trade Organization, the new WTO Agreement incorporated a modified
and strengthened multilateral Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. This is the "TBT Agreement" we have
nowadays.
IN BRIEF
Within the WTO framework, the TBT Agreement is intended to ensure that technical regulations, standards
and conformity assessment procedures do not constitute unnecessary barriers to international trade while
recognizing the right of Members to take regulatory measures to achieve their legitimate objectives:
national security requirements, quality requirements, protection of human health or safety, protection of
animal or plant life or health, protection of the environment, prevention of deceptive practices, among
others.
It is time for us to proceed to an examination of the TBT Agreement: its history, objectives, structure, scope of
application, coverage, matters not covered by it and its relationship with the SPS Agreements, definitions,
institutional application and temporal scope of application.
2
II. THE TBT AGREEMENT
II.A. HISTORY OF THE TBT AGREEMENT
The GATT 1947 had not established a comprehensive legal structure for the treatment of technical regulations
and standards. The idea that a specific agreement was necessary emerged during the 1970s.
A Plurilateral Tokyo Round TBT Agreement was signed at the end of the Tokyo Round on 12 April 1979 and
entered into force on 1 January 1980. It laid down rules for the preparation, adoption and application of
technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment procedures. By the time the Uruguay Round of
negotiations was concluded, 46 GATT Contracting Parties had accepted the Tokyo Round TBT Agreement
(BISD 26S/8 (1980)). This Agreement was seen as a "highly successful" one, in the sense that many GATT
Parties adhered to it, which was not always the case for other plurilateral agreements created under the
GATT 1947.
Note that plurilateral obligations regarding general disciplines (different to the plurilateral sectoral agreements
we have today) can be quite problematic with regards to the predictability, stability and uniformity of the legal
system. In order to tackle these issues, the "single undertaking" rule was envisaged for the Uruguay Round
Agreements. This ensured that all WTO Members would be bound by the same obligations, making the system
more balanced and predictable.
RECALL
Do you recall the single undertaking rule? If not, take a look at Module 1 again. This is the principle that
states that WTO Members are bound by all WTO Multilateral Agreements. There are very few Plurilateral
Agreements, currently two, which only bind the WTO Members who have accepted to be bound by them.
The Tokyo Round TBT Agreement applied to technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment
procedures in general, including measures aiming at food safety and human, animal and plant life or health
protection from contaminants, pests and diseases. Such topics are currently under the discipline of the
multilateral Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (the SPS Agreement).
The main differences between the WTO TBT Agreement and the Tokyo Round TBT Agreement are:
Under the Uruguay Round's "single undertaking", when signing the WTO Agreement, all Members were
automatically signing into the TBT Agreement, too. This stands in contrast to the plurilateral nature of
the Tokyo Round TBT Agreement.
Under the WTO, two separate agreements have been created – the SPS Agreement on food safety and
animal and plant health protection against pests and diseases – and the TBT Agreement, whose
combined coverage is roughly the same as the Tokyo Round TBT Agreement.
The WTO TBT Agreement is subject to the unified dispute settlement provisions of the WTO, although it
also contains some specific additional provisions on the matter. The Tokyo Round TBT Agreement had
its own dispute settlement mechanism.
Unlike the Tokyo Round TBT Agreement, the WTO TBT Agreement covers measures applicable both to
products and to related processes.
3
The WTO TBT Agreement, negotiated during the Uruguay Round, is one out of 12 multilateral trade
agreements on the international trade in goods, subsumed under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
1994 (GATT 1994). The WTO TBT Agreement has strengthened and clarified the provisions of the Tokyo Round
TBT Agreement. Many of the latter's provisions have been carried forward, but there are significant
differences, both in form and content, as explained above.
II.B. OBJECTIVES
IN BRIEF
The Preamble of the TBT Agreement clearly outlines a balance.
While the main objective of the Agreement is to ensure that technical regulations, standards and
conformity assessment procedures do not create unnecessary obstacles to international trade;
It is recognized that no country shall be prevented from taking measures necessary to ensure,
inter alia, the following:
the quality of its exports;
the protection of human, animal or plant life or health;
the protection of the environment;
the prevention of deceptive practices, at levels it considers appropriate; and
the protection of its essential security interest.
Given that this list is not exhaustive, Members may protect other legitimate objectives while using the
measures prescribed under the TBT Agreement. Nevertheless, regulatory measures undertaken with the
purpose to protect a Member's legitimate objectives shall neither hinder the rights of other WTO Members nor
what has been achieved through market access liberalization, that is, through lower import duties and taxes.
To sum up, regulatory measures are permitted as long as they are not applied in a manner which constitutes a
means of "arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail" or a
"disguised restriction on international trade", and are otherwise in accordance with the provisions of the
Agreement. This is will be further explained throughout our course.
4
IN DETAIL
The relevant part of the Preamble to the TBT Agreement reads as follows:
( ... )
Desiring however to ensure that technical regulations and standards, including packaging, marking and
labelling requirements, and procedures for assessment of conformity with technical regulations and
standards do not create unnecessary obstacles to international trade;
Recognizing that no country should be prevented from taking measures necessary to ensure the quality of
its exports, or for the protection of human, animal or plant life or health, of the environment, or for the
prevention of deceptive practices, at the levels it considers appropriate, subject to the requirement that
they are not applied in a manner which would constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable
discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail or a disguised restriction on
international trade, and are otherwise in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement;
Recognizing that no country should be prevented from taking measures necessary for the protection of its
essential security interest;
( ... )
As we are going to see below, being aware of the objectives incorporated in the TBT Agreement is very
important for verifying if such Agreement applies to a certain measure.
Moreover, the preamble of an international treaty provides information about the object and purpose of the
treaty. That is, the preamble is important for the interpretation of the agreement, as provided by the
customary rules of treaty interpretation referred to in Article 3.2 of the WTO Dispute Settlement
Understanding.
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE ...
CUSTOMARY RULES OF TREATY INTERPRETATION
The customary rules of treaty interpretation are enumerated in Article 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention
on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) of 1969, which can be found at our Digital Library. These two articles
provide that a treaty shall be interpreted in good faith and according to the ordinary meaning of its terms in
their context and in the light of its object and purpose. Besides the Preamble, other instruments serve to
determine the context of a treaty, such as other (related) agreements celebrated between the same
parties.
The Appellate Body, while deciding the case US - Gasoline (WT/DS2), noted that Article 31 of the VCLT
forms part of the customary rules of treaty interpretation, incorporated into Article 3.2 of the WTO Dispute
Settlement Understanding.
5
II.C. STRUCTURE
The TBT Agreement consists of a Preamble, setting out the general objectives of the Agreement, 15 articles
and three annexes. Its structure is straightforward:
The first set of provisions concerns the preparation, adoption and application of technical regulations
(Articles 2-3).
The second set deals with the preparation, adoption and application of standards (Article 4, and Code of good
practice for the preparation, adoption and application of standards (Annex 3).
The third set of provisions relates to conformity assessment procedures (Articles 5-9).
The remainder of the Agreement (Articles 10-14) deals with transparency, technical assistance, special and
differential treatment, dispute settlement and institutional issues (the work of the TBT Committee).
In addition, Annex 1 contains definitions of the terms used in the Agreement and Annex 2 lays down provisions
referred to technical experts groups. Annex 3 deals with the preparation, adoption and application of
standards by standardizing bodies.
IN DETAIL
PROVISIONS OF THE TBT AGREEMENT
PREAMBLE
Article 1 General Provisions
TECHNICAL REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
Article 2 Preparation, Adoption and Application of Technical Regulations by Central Government
Bodies
Article 3 Preparation, Adoption and Application of Technical Regulations by Local Government Bodies
and Non-Governmental Bodies
Article 4 Preparation, Adoption and Application of Standards
CONFORMITY WITH TECHNICAL REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
Article 5 Procedures for Assessment of Conformity by Central Government Bodies
Article 6 Recognition of Conformity Assessment by Central Government Bodies
Article 7 Procedures for Assessment of Conformity by Local Government Bodies
Article 8 Procedures for Assessment of Conformity by Non-Governmental Bodies
Article 9 International and Regional Systems
7
INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE
Article 10 Information About Technical Regulations, Standards and Conformity Assessment
Procedures
Article 11 Technical Assistance to Other Members
Article 12 Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Country Members
INSTITUTIONS, CONSULTATION AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
Article 13 The Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade
Article 14 Consultation and Dispute Settlement
FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 15 Final Provisions (Reservations, Review and Annexes)
ANNEXES
Annex 1 Terms and their definitions for the purpose of this Agreement
Annex 2 Technical expert groups
Annex 3 Code of good practice for the preparation, adoption and application of standards
Now it is time for us to present the TBT Agreement's provisions on applicability, coverage, matters excluded
from the TBT Agreement, relationship with the SPS Agreements, relevant definitions, institutional coverage and
temporal applicability.
II.D. SCOPE OF APPLICATION
The TBT Agreement applies to:
Technical regulations: measures which lay down product characteristics or their related processes
and production methods, with which compliance is mandatory.
Standards: measures approved by a Recognised Body that provide, for common and repeated use,
rules, guidelines or characteristics for products or related processes and production methods, with which
compliance is voluntary (i.e. not mandatory).
Conformity assessment procedures: procedures used, directly or indirectly, to determine the
fulfilment of relevant requirements contained in technical regulations or standards.
The TBT Agreement covers the measures above, as well as their amendments and additions, as applied to final
products and/or to related processes and production methods. Technical regulations and standards include
terminology, symbols, packaging, marking or labelling requirements, among others.
It is important to know the scope of application of the TBT Agreement, to be able to verify if it applies to a
certain measure, since there are two other WTO agreements, the GATT 1994 and the SPS Agreement which
also regulate internal measures (such as domestic technical regulations).
8
In fact, the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures covers regulations with very specific objectives
such as to prevent risks arising from food, and animal or plant-carried diseases and pests. Thus, the
verification of a measure's characteristics and the identification of its object are important steps to determine
if a measure is covered by the TBT Agreement.
However, it is clear that often the same regulation has more than one objective and may be subject to the
disciplines of both, the SPS and the TBT Agreements. Parts of the regulation (that is, some provisions) could
fall within the scope of the SPS Agreement, while others could fall within that of the TBT Agreement.
We shall present a full definition of the three types of measures regulated by the TBT Agreement in Module 4.
For now, let’s just keep in mind that "technical regulations", "standards", and "conformity assessment
procedures" are the three types of measures within the scope of applicability of the TBT Agreement.
II.E. COVERAGE
IN DETAIL
The coverage of the TBT Agreement extends to all technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment
procedures that apply to trade in goods, i.e. to all agricultural and industrial products.
Article 1.3 reads:
All products, including industrial and agricultural products, shall be subject to the provisions of this
Agreement.
In terms of the definitions contained in Annex 1, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the TBT Agreement:
... technical regulations and standards which lay down related "processes and production methods"
(PPMs) that are related to characteristics of products are also covered by the TBT Agreement.
In addition, the second sentence of Annex 1, paragraphs 1 and 2 provides that:
... technical regulations and standards "may also include or deal exclusively with terminology, symbols,
packaging, marking or labelling requirements as they apply to a product, process or production method".
The TBT Agreement does NOT apply to:
Sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures
Purchasing specifications prepared by governments
Regulations and standards related to services
9
Important note
Technical measures relating to services are dealt with under Article VI.4 of the GATS, and not under the
TBT Agreement.
II.E.1. PROCESS AND PRODUCTION METHODS (PPMS)
It is important to keep in mind that, in contrast to the Tokyo Round TBT Agreement, the current
TBT Agreement does regulate technical regulation and standards focused on processes and production methods
(PPMs), when they are related to the characteristics of products covered by the TBT Agreement.
However, PPMs not related to these characteristics, in other words, PPMs that are not detectable in the final
product, i.e., do not leave traces, or, in trade jargon, "non-product related PPMs", are seen by the majority of
Members as not regulated by the TBT Agreement. The issue of coverage of non-product related PPMs has
triggered a complex debate both in the TBT Committee and, in the context of the discussion on eco-labelling, in
the Committee on Trade and Environment (CTE). Non product related PPMs may constitute important policy
tools in order to secure the safety of employees or to protect the environment.
The applicability of the TBT Agreement to non-product related PPMs has never been interpreted at the WTO by
a Panel or the Appellate Body, nor has it been the object of an Understanding of Interpretation by Members.
Nevertheless, even if the TBT Agreement were not applicable to measures on non-product related PPMs, these
are covered by other WTO Agreements, for example, Article XX of the GATT.
GATT Article XX has been interpreted in WTO dispute settlement cases time and again. An important case was
decided in 2001 in the US - Shrimp Turtle dispute (United States — Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and
Shrimp Products WT/DS58). Here, the Appellate Body (AB) had the opportunity to examine PPMs measures
under the GATT Agreement, not under the TBT Agreement.
The case involved a typical situation of non-product related PPMs. The measure in question was a regulation
adopted by the United States (US) which banned imported shrimps which had been caught using a different
method to the one recommended to prevent killing sea turtles. Now, shrimps caught using a method that
could kill sea turtles and shrimps caught with the recommended method that prevents such occurrence (TED),
cannot be distinguished between one another, at least not solely based on the product's characteristics.
The Appellate Body recognized the right of WTO Members to protect exhaustible natural resources, as long as
they do not do this in a way that arbitrarily or unjustifiably discriminates between countries where the same
conditions prevail, or that disguisedly restricts international trade.
However, in the US - Shrimp Turtle case, the Appellate Body did not expressly recognize the two "types" of
shrimp as "unlike" products. What it did, during the case's implementation phase, was to accept that a WTO
Member may adopt a PPM measure that is non-product related and still find a justification for it under
Article XX (General Exceptions). That is, the measure may be seen as a valid reason for violating other
WTO obligations, such as the prohibition on quantitative restriction or the national treatment principle, as long
as it complies with all the requirements of Article XX, i.e., be subsumed to at least one of the paragraphs of
Article XX and be in accordance with the obligations provided for in the chapeau of the Article.
10
RECALL
Do you remember which are the GATT basic obligations and general exceptions?
GATT Article I
Pursuant to Article I, on the Most Favoured Nation Principle, WTO Members are bound to grant to the
products of other Members treatment no less favourable than that accorded to the products of any other
country. Thus, no Member is to give special trading advantages to one Member at the exclusion of others.
All Members are meant to be treated on an equal footing and share the benefits of any moves towards
lower trade barriers.
GATT Article III
Article III contains the National Treatment Principle. It stipulates that once goods have entered a market,
they must be treated no less favourably than like products that are domestically produced. More
specifically, Article III:4 requires that the products of any Member imported into any other Member shall be
accorded treatment no less favourable than that accorded to like products of national origin in respect of
"all laws, regulations and requirements affecting their internal sale, offering for sale, purchase,
transportation, distribution or use".
Other GATT provisions
Further provisions of the GATT 1994 are also relevant. Article XI requires the general elimination of
quantitative restrictions on the importation or exportation of products. Article XI:2(b) introduces an
exception to the general rule and allows import and export prohibitions or restrictions "necessary to the
application of standards or regulations for the classification, grading or marketing of commodities in
international trade".
Exceptions
Finally, Article XX establishes exceptions to GATT obligations that may be relevant to TBT measures. This
provision lays out a number of specific instances in which Members may be "exempted" from GATT rules,
including for the protection of "exhaustible natural resources" or the "protection of human, animal or plant
life or health". However, the chapeau, which is the introductory sentence to Article XX, is designed to
ensure that such measures do not result in arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination and do not constitute a
disguised restriction on international trade.
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE ...
TRADE AND ENVIRONMENT AT THE WTO
Trade and Environment is an important topic in the WTO Trade Agenda. There is a Committee (The
Committee on Trade and Environment) in charge of the discussions, whose mandate was established by
the 1994 Decision on Trade and Environment.
If you want to know more about this subject and the discussions around PPMs, check the background paper
prepared by the WTO Trade and Environment Division, Trade and Environment at the WTO.
11
EXERCISES:
2. What is the structure of the TBT Agreement?
3. What is the coverage of the TBT Agreement?
12
II.F. MATTERS EXCLUDED FROM THE TBT AGREEMENT
Two areas of trade in goods are excluded from the TBT Agreement:
Sanitary and phytosanitary measures, which are subject to the provisions of the Agreement on the
Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement); and
Government procurement specifications, which are addressed in the plurilateral Agreement on
Government Procurement, only for its specific membership and covered entities (GPA Agreement).
In addition, technical measures relating to services are dealt with under Article VI.4 of the GATS, and not
under the TBT Agreement.
II.F.1. EXCLUSION OF SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES
Article 1.5 of the TBT Agreement excludes sanitary and phytosanitary measures from its scope of application.
It reads:
The provisions of this Agreement do not apply to sanitary and phytosanitary measures as defined in
Annex A of the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures.
Likewise, Article 1.4 of the SPS Agreement provides that:
Nothing in this Agreement shall affect the rights of Members under the Agreement on Technical Barriers to
Trade with respect to measures not within the scope of this Agreement.
The scope of application of the SPS and the TBT Agreements are therefore mutually exclusive. That is: the
TBT Agreement covers all technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment procedures, except
when these are sanitary or phytosanitary measures as defined by the SPS Agreement.
Note
Sometimes a regulation may have more than one objective and, therefore, could be covered by both
Agreements, the SPS and the TBT. Parts of the regulation (that is, some provisions) could fall within the
scope of the SPS Agreement, while others will fall within that of the TBT Agreement.
As mentioned before, prior to 1994 and the conclusion of the SPS Agreement, the Tokyo Round TBT Agreement
also used to cover technical requirements resulting from food safety and animal and plant health measures,
including pesticide residue limits, inspection requirements and labelling.
13
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE
For more details on the SPS Agreement see "Understanding the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures" on the WTO web site.
II.F.2. EXCLUSION OF GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS
Article 1.4 of the TBT Agreement excludes government procurement specifications from its coverage. It reads:
Purchasing specifications prepared by governmental bodies for production or consumption requirements of
governmental bodies are not subject to the provisions of this Agreement but are addressed in the
Agreement on Government Procurement, according to its coverage.
Such specifications are subject to the relevant provisions in the plurilateral Agreement on Government
Procurement (GPA) which apply only to GPA parties.
The GPA applies to "any law, regulation, procedure or practice regarding any procurement by entities covered
by this Agreement" as specified in a positive list of entities annexed to the Agreement by each Party, and to
procurement beyond defined threshold levels for each Party "by any contractual means, including through such
methods as purchase or as lease, rental or hire purchase, with or without an option to buy, including any
combination of products and services" (GPA, Articles I.1 and I.2).
Any "law, regulation, procedure" includes technical specifications. The GPA provides, among others, that
technical specifications applied in government procurement by Parties to the Agreement shall be in terms of
performance rather than design or descriptive characteristics, and be based on international standards, where
such exist; otherwise, on national technical regulations, recognized national standards, or building codes
(GPA, Article VI.2).
Currently, the GPA has 38 individual Members (12 Members if counting the European Union as one) and nine
others currently negotiating their accession.
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE
THE GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT
If you want to know more about the GP Agreement, check the section on the subject at the WTO website.
You may learn a lot about this subject, which is of interest not only to the Parties to the Plurilateral
Agreement!
14
II.G. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SPS AND THE TBT AGREEMENTS
The SPS Agreement covers all measures, even if these are technical requirements, whose purpose is to protect
human or animal health from food-borne risks, human health from animal or plant-carried diseases, animals
and plants from pests or diseases, or to prevent other damage from pests. Annex A, paragraph 1 of the
SPS Agreement provides that SPS Measures include:
All relevant laws, decrees, regulations, requirements and procedures including, inter alia, end product
criteria; processes and production methods; testing, inspection, certification and approval procedures;
quarantine treatments including relevant requirements associated with the transport of animals or plants,
or with the materials necessary for their survival during transport; provisions on relevant statistical
methods, sampling procedures and methods of risk assessment; and packaging and labelling
requirements directly related to food safety.
The TBT Agreement covers all technical regulations, standards or conformity assessment procedures, except
when these are SPS measures, regardless of their objective.
Important note
It is the type (technical regulations, standards or conformity assessment procedures) of measure which
determines coverage by the TBT Agreement, but it is the objective of the measure which is relevant in
determining whether it is subject to the SPS Agreement. SPS Measures are those whose objective is
specified in Annex A of the SPS Agreement
Summarizing, the objectives of SPS MEASURES ARE:
To protect From
animal or plant life or
health
the entry, establishment or spread of pests, disease-carrying or disease-causing
organisms
human or animal life or
health
risks arising from additives, contaminants, toxins or disease-causing organisms
in their food, beverages or feedstuffs
human life or health diseases carried by plants, animals or products thereof (zoonoses)
a country damage caused by the entry, establishment or spread of pests
Table 1: Objectives of SPS Measures
15
Important Note
"Animal" includes fish and wild fauna;
"plant" includes forests and wild flora;
"pests" include weeds; and
"contaminants" include pesticide and veterinary drug residues and extraneous matter.
TBT MEASURES
TBT measures could cover any subject, from car safety to energy-saving devices, to the shape of food cartons.
To give some examples pertaining to human health, TBT measures could include requirements for
pharmaceuticals or the labelling of cigarettes. In terms of food, most labelling requirements, nutrition claims
and concerns, quality and packaging regulations are generally considered to be TBT measures.
As illustrated below, international trade of fruits and bottled water may be subject to regulations that would fall
under both the TBT and SPS Agreement: a measure dealing with the treatment of the imported fruit to
prevent the spread of pests would fall under the SPS Agreement, while a measure addressing quality, grading
and labelling characteristics of the imported fruit would fall under the TBT Agreement. Regulation on the
international trade of bottled water could set forth measures aimed at the prevention of the presence of
contaminants and disease-causing organisms in the water, while also setting packaging and labelling standards
aimed at quality and consumer safety concerns.
TBT OR SPS?
AN EXAMPLE: ORANGES
Figure 1: TBT and SPS measures relating to the international trade of orange
16
ANOTHER EXAMPLE: BOTTLED WATER – SPECIFICATION FOR BOTTLES
Figure 2: TBT and SPS measures relating to the international trade of bottled water
COMMON FEATURES
The two Agreements have some common elements, including the requirement that a measure be the least
trade restrictive; disciplines regarding control and inspection procedures (Conformity Assessment Procedures
in the TBT Agreement, and Control, Inspection and Approval procedures in SPS Agreement); basic obligations
of non-discrimination and similar requirements for the advance notification of proposed measures and the
creation of information offices (so-called transparency requirements).
Furthermore, both Agreements encourage the use of international standards in order to promote
harmonization.
DIFFERENCES
Sanitary and phytosanitary measures may be imposed only to the extent necessary to protect human, animal
and plant health, and on the basis of scientific information.
Governments may, however, introduce TBT regulations when necessary to meet a number of objectives, such
as national security, the prevention of deceptive practices, protection of human, animal or plant life or health,
or the environment, among others. Because the obligations that governments have accepted are different
under the two agreements, it is important to know whether a measure falls under the realm of SPS or TBT.
17
Examples of TBT and Examples of SPS measures
SPS measures
typically deal with:
Additives in food or drink; contaminants in food or drink; poisonous substances in
food or drink; residues of veterinary drugs or pesticides in food or drink;
certification of food safety, animal or plant health; processing methods with
implications for food safety; labelling requirements directly related to food safety;
plant/animal quarantine; declarations of areas free from specific pests or diseases;
other sanitary requirements for imports (on imported pallets used to transport
animals, for example); etc.
TBT measures
typically deal with:
Composition of certain processed foods; labelling of food, drink and drugs; quality
requirements for fresh food; packaging requirements for fresh food; packaging and
labelling for dangerous chemicals and toxic substances; regulations for electrical
appliances; regulations for cordless phones, radio equipment; textiles and
garments product/production description; testing of vehicles and accessories;
safety for toys; etc.
Table 2: Examples of TBT and SPS Measures
EXERCISES:
4. What are the measures excluded from the TBT Agreement?
5. Can you place the measures taken by WTO Members below under the correct category? TBT or
SPS Measures?
1) The limitation on the use of lithium in batteries, for reasons of health and safety.
2) Requirements on the size, colour and quality of fruits.
3) The control of pesticide use in fruits, for reasons of food safety.
4) Specifications on recyclable packaging for strawberries, for environmental purposes.
5) Prohibition of the use of CFC products in microchips, to protect the ozone layer.
6) The ban of chicken imports from bird flu affected areas, to protect domestic birds and human health.
18
II.H. RELEVANT DEFINITIONS
Annex 1 of the TBT Agreement defines many of the terms used in the Agreement, namely technical
regulations; standards; conformity assessment procedures; international body or system; regional body or
system; central government body; local government body; and non-governmental body. Understanding
these definitions is essential for the comprehension of the TBT Agreement disciplines and for engaging in this
course. In brief:
1. Technical regulation: Document which lays down product characteristics or their related processes and
production methods, with which compliance is mandatory.
2. Standard: Document approved by a recognized body, that provides, for common and repeated use,
rules, guidelines or characteristics for products or related processes and production methods, with which
compliance is not mandatory.
Technical regulations and standards include terminology, symbols, packaging, marking or labelling
requirements.
3. Conformity assessment procedures: Any procedure used, directly or indirectly, to determine that relevant
requirements in technical regulations or standards are fulfilled. They include, inter alia, procedures for
sampling, testing and inspection; evaluation, verification and assurance of conformity; registration,
accreditation and approval as well as their combinations.
4. International body or system: Body or system whose membership is open to the relevant bodies of at
least all Members.
5. Regional body or system: Body or system whose membership is open to the relevant bodies of only some
of the Members.
6. Central government body: Central government, its ministries and departments, or any body subject to
the control of the central government in respect of the activity in question.
7. Local government body: Government other than a central government (e.g. states, provinces, Länder,
cantons, municipalities, etc.), its ministries or departments, or any body subject to the control of such a
government in respect of the activity in question.
8. Non-governmental body: Body other than a central government body or a local government body,
including a non-governmental body which has legal power to enforce a technical regulation.
In the case of the European Union, the provisions governing central government bodies apply. However,
regional bodies or conformity assessment systems may be established within the European Union, and in such
cases would be subject to the provisions of this Agreement on regional bodies or conformity assessment
systems.
19
Pursuant to Article 1.1 of the TBT Agreement, the terms for standardization, procedures and assessment of
conformity not specifically defined in Annex 1, shall have the meaning adopted within the United Nations
system and by international standardizing bodies. The definitions in the ISO/IEC Guide 2:1991 - Sixth Edition,
which corresponds to the period when the TBT Agreement was being drafted, are used for standardization
purposes. The definition of standards contained in the ISO/IEC Guide 2:1991 reads:
Document, established by consensus and approved by a recognised body, that provides, for common and
repeated use, rules, guidelines or characteristics for activities or their results, aimed at the achievement of
the optimum degree of order in a given context.
NOTE – Standards should be based on the consolidated results of science, technology and experience, and
aimed at the promotion of optimum community benefits.
We may note three main differences in terms of coverage and definition of standards between the
TBT Agreement and the ISO/IEC Guide 2:1991:
The ISO/IEC Guide 2:1991 covers services while the TBT Agreement does not;
pursuant to ISO/IEC Guide 2:1991, a standard may be either voluntary or mandatory while for the
purpose of the TBT Agreement standards are voluntary; and
in the Guide, standards are consensus-based while the TBT Agreement also covers standards that are
not based on consensus.
You should keep in mind that the definition and coverage of standards provided in the TBT Agreement shall
prevail over those presented in the ISO/IEC Guide 2:1991, for the interpretation and application of the
Agreement's rights and obligations.
II.I. INSTITUTIONAL COVERAGE
The TBT Agreement applies to a wide range of bodies and systems, both governmental and non-governmental:
Central government, local government, international, regional and non-governmental bodies.
Members are responsible for the implementation of the TBT Agreement, but their obligation to ensure
compliance is different at different levels of governmental bodies, non-governmental entities and regional
bodies.
In its Annex 1, paragraphs 4 to 8, the TBT Agreement provides definitions of the five different levels of bodies
and systems mentioned above. Members' obligations regarding the compliance with the TBT Agreement of
each category of body are summarized below:
Central Government Bodies: Members are fully responsible for ensuring that central government bodies
comply with the obligations regarding technical regulations and conformity assessment procedures.
Members shall also ensure that central government standardizing bodies accept and comply with the
Code of Good Practice for the Preparation, Adoption and Application of Standards (Code of Good
Practice).
20
Local Governmental Bodies: Members are responsible and shall take reasonable measures to ensure
those bodies' compliance with the Agreement's provisions on technical regulations and conformity
assessment procedures; as well as ensure that such bodies accept and comply with the Code of Good
Practice.
Non-governmental entities within the territory of the Members and Regional Bodies of which it (or a
national entity within its territory) is a member: Members shall take reasonable measures to ensure
that they accept and comply with the Code of Good Practice and the relevant provisions of the
Agreement, particularly Articles 5 and 6 on conformity assessment, and shall only rely on such bodies'
conformity assessment procedures if they comply with these two provisions.
International bodies: Members shall take reasonable measures to ensure that they comply with
Articles 5 and 6 on conformity assessment, and shall only rely on such bodies' conformity assessment
procedures if they comply with these two provisions.
Furthermore, Members shall not take measures which require or encourage any of the abovementioned
standardizing bodies to act inconsistently with the Agreement, its Code of Good Practice, or both. The
obligations of Members regarding compliance of standardizing bodies with the provisions of the Code of
Good Practice apply irrespectively of whether a standardizing body has accepted the Code.
A number of regional bodies undertake work on TBT issues, and there is a growing use of commercial or
private standards developed by non-governmental bodies which address performance or product specifications.
Furthermore, for the same product, there may be a "patchwork" of requirements, which include local and
central regulations as well as non-governmental standards, adopted following the demand of industries and
consumer interests groups.
II.J. TEMPORAL SCOPE OF APPLICATION
The TBT Agreement applies to measures currently in legal force, regardless of the date they were enacted by
the Member.
Article XVI:4 of the WTO Agreement provides for the temporal scope of application of the WTO Agreement,
including the TBT Agreement. It reads as follows:
Each Member shall ensure the conformity of its laws, regulations and administrative procedures with its
obligations as provided in the annexed Agreements.
Concerning the TBT Agreement, in the EC – Sardines case, the Appellate Body upheld the Panel's finding that
Article 2.4 applies not only to the "preparation and adoption" of technical regulations, but also to the
"application" of existing measures adopted prior to 1 January 1995. The Panel and the Appellate Body in the
EC - Sardines case did not find any temporal limitations in the language of the Agreement.
21
EXERCISES:
6. Members are responsible for the implementation of the TBT Agreement, but their obligation to ensure
compliance is different at different levels of governmental bodies, non-governmental entities and regional
bodies. Could you elaborate on this?
7. What is the temporal scope of application of the TBT Agreement?
22
III. SUMMARY
OBJECTIVES OF THE TBT AGREEMENT
While the main objective of the Agreement is to ensure that technical regulations, standards and
conformity assessment procedures do not create unnecessary obstacles to international trade, it is
recognized that no country shall be prevented from taking measures necessary to ensure, inter alia, the
following:
the quality of its exports;
the protection of human, animal or plant life or health;
the protection of the environment;
the prevention of deceptive practices, at levels it considers appropriate; and
the protection of its essential security interests.
THE TBT AGREEMENT APPLIES TO
Technical regulations, which are measures that lay down product characteristics or their related processes
and production methods, with which compliance is mandatory;
Standards, which are measures approved by a Recognised Body that provide, for common and repeated
use, rules, guidelines or characteristics for products or related processes and production methods, with
which compliance is voluntary (i.e. not mandatory);
Conformity assessment procedures, which are procedures used, directly or indirectly, to determine that
relevant requirements in technical regulations or standards are fulfilled.
THE TBT AGREEMENT DOES NOT APPLY TO
Sanitary and phytosanitary measures; purchasing specifications prepared by governments (government
procurement); and to regulations related to services.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SPS AND TBT AGREEMENT
The SPS and the TBT Agreements are mutually exclusive (Article 1.5 of the TBT Agreement).
The SPS Agreement covers all measures intended to protect human or animal health from food-
borne risks; human health from animal or plant-carried diseases; animals and plants from pests or
diseases; or to prevent other damage from pests.
The TBT Agreement covers all technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment
procedures, regardless of their objectives, except when these are sanitary or phytosanitary
measures, as defined by Annex A of the SPS Agreement.
23
THE INSTITUTIONAL COVERAGE OF THE TBT AGREEMENT INCLUDES
A wide range of bodies and systems, governmental and non-governmental: central government, local
government, regional and international bodies, and non-governmental entities. Members' obligations vary
according to the type of body.
THE TEMPORAL SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT
The TBT Agreement applies to measures in legal force, regardless of the date they were enacted by the
WTO Member.
24
PROPOSED ANSWERS:
1. The Preamble of the TBT Agreement outlines a balance:
While the main objective of the Agreement is to ensure that technical regulations, standards and
conformity assessment procedures do not create unnecessary obstacles to international trade;
It is recognized that no country should be prevented from taking measures necessary to ensure,
inter alia, the following:
the quality of its exports;
the protection of human, animal or plant life or health;
the protection of the environment;
the prevention of deceptive practices, at levels it considers appropriate; and
the protection of its essential security interest.
2. The TBT Agreement consists of a Preamble, setting out the general objectives of the Agreement,
15 Articles and three Annexes. Its structure is straightforward:
The first set of provisions concerns the preparation, adoption and application of technical regulations
(Articles 2-3).
The second set deals with the preparation, adoption and application of standards (Article 4, and Code of
Good Practice (Annex 3)).
The third set of provisions relates to conformity assessment procedures (Articles 5-9).
The remainder of the Agreement (Articles 10-14) deals with transparency, technical assistance, special
and differential treatment, dispute settlement and institutional issues, i.e. the work of the
TBT Committee.
In addition, Annex 1 contains definitions of the terms used in the Agreement and Annex 2 lays down
provisions for technical expert groups.
3. Within the scope of the TBT Agreement we find (i) technical regulations, (ii) conformity assessment
procedures, and (iii) standards.
Technical regulations are measures which lay down product characteristics or their related processes
and production methods, with which compliance is mandatory;
Standards are measures approved by a Recognised Body that provide, for common and repeated
use, rules, guidelines or characteristics for products or related processes and production methods,
with which compliance is voluntary (i.e. not mandatory);
Conformity assessment procedures, which are procedures used, directly or indirectly, to determine
that relevant requirements in technical regulations or standards are fulfilled.
The TBT Agreement covers the measures above, and their amendments and additions, as applied to final
products and/or to related processes and production methods.
25
4. Two areas of trade in goods are excluded from the TBT Agreement:
(i) Sanitary and phytosanitary measures, which are subject to the provisions of the Agreement on the
Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement); and
(ii) Government procurement specifications, which are addressed (only for its specific membership and
covered entities) in the plurilateral Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA Agreement).
In addition, technical measures relating to services are dealt with under Article VI.4 of the GATS, and not
under the TBT Agreement.
5. SPS Measures, numbers 3 and 6.
TBT Measures, numbers 1, 2, 4 and 5
6. Members are responsible for the implementation of the TBT Agreement, but their obligation to ensure
compliance is different at different levels of governmental bodies, non-governmental entities and regional
bodies.
In its Annex 1, paragraphs 4 to 8, the TBT Agreement provides definitions of the five different levels of
bodies and systems mentioned above. Members' obligations regarding the compliance with the
TBT Agreement of each category of body are summarized below:
Central Government Bodies: Members are fully responsible for ensuring that central government
bodies comply with the obligations regarding technical regulations and conformity assessment
procedures. Members shall also ensure that central government standardizing bodies accept and
comply with the Code of Good Practice for the Preparation, Adoption and Application of Standards
(Code of Good Practice).
Local Governmental Bodies: Members are responsible and shall take reasonable measures to ensure
those bodies compliance with the Agreement's provisions on technical regulations and conformity
assessment procedures; as well as ensure that such bodies accept and comply with the Code of
Good Practice.
Non-governmental entities within the territory of the Members and Regional Bodies of which it (or a
national entity within its territory) is a member: Members shall take reasonable measures to ensure
that they accept and comply with the Code of Good Practice and the relevant provisions of the
Agreement, particularly Articles 5 and 6 on conformity assessment, and shall only rely on such
bodies conformity assessment procedures if they comply with these two provisions.
International bodies: Members shall take reasonable measures to ensure that they comply with
Articles 5 and 6 on conformity assessment, and shall only rely on such bodies conformity
assessment procedures if they comply with these two provisions.
Furthermore, Members shall not take measures which require or encourage any of the
abovementioned standardizing bodies to act inconsistently with the Agreement, its Code of Good
Practice, or both. The obligations of Members regarding compliance of standardizing bodies with the
provisions of the Code of Good Practice apply irrespectively of whether a standardizing body has
accepted the Code.
7. The TBT Agreement applies to measures currently in legal force, regardless of the date they were enacted
by the Member.
26