TEAM PURPLE 2010
description
Transcript of TEAM PURPLE 2010
TEAM PURPLE 2010HydroAsia
Final Presentation
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
PURPLE TEAM CONCEPT
Reducing Flood Damage by Increasing Green Area
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
subcatchments
Runoff coefficient:Between 0.7 and 0.8
Areaalmost totally
impervious0.75
0.75
0.80
0.74 – 0.8
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
subcatchments
Runoff coefficient:Between 0.3 and 0.8
0.450.45
0.45
0.80
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Increase of green areas (Bioretention cells,vegetation), with depression storage
Increases well-being and quality of life of the city's inhabitants, environmentally friendly
Possibility to use low impact development also, new technologies.
Stormwater Management solutions for runoff control
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Green parking design : utilizing alternative pavers in overflow parking areas◦ Depression storage 1.5mm◦ Capillary suction: 10 mm◦ Manning’s N: 0;03
Permeable pavement : allows stormwater to drain through the porous surface to a stone reservoir underneath. The reservoir temporarily stores surface runoff.
Stormwater Management solutions for high urbanized areas
10% of total area =40 000 m3
storage
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Overview-Incheon Gyo Watershed-Method
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Incheon Gyo Watershed
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
ArcGIS: catchment modelTriangular Irregular Network
•Contour•Manholes
Raster
Building and Road Layers
Digital Elevation Model
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Incheon Gyo DEM
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Rainfall runoff process for urban catchment
Water level B.C Hydrograph based on runoff
Rainfall ImperviousnessCatchment
area
Surface
• Water level• Discharge: Q
DEM→Roads
Roads+Storage
Routing
Sewage network
• Water level• Discharge Q
BasinManhole
Sewer pipe flow
FLOOD AREA
Hydrological Model
Hydraulic Model
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Flood AnalysisProcess Flowchart
MIKE ZERO
DEM
MIKE 21Simulating the surface flow Simulating the sewer network flow
MOUSE
Analysis Results
Results
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Preparation of Analysis
Sewer Network Checking
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple Here!
Sewer Network Problems(1)
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Sewer Network Problems(1)
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Sewer Network Problems(2)(too Low Elevation of Manhole )
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Sewer Network Problems(2)
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
BackgroundFlood in Incheon Gyo 1997
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Rainfall Intensity
Rainfall Intensity
Rain
fall
Inte
nsity
[mm
/h]
Time
Outline of 1997Flood in Incheon Gyo
:Flood Area
Impervious Area Distribution and Flood Area Distribution
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Simulations-Current Conditions-Landuse modifications
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
MIKE21: ◦ Manning Number: 32 →(at green area: 25)◦ Rainfall: Aug. 4 1977 4:00am-6:00pm for all
Catchments◦ Tidal Data
MOUSE:◦ Tidal Data at 3 Nodes(Outlets)◦ Rainfall: Aug. 4 1997 4:00am-6:00pm for all
Catchments◦ Runoff Coefficient: 75%-80% (at Green Area: 45%)
Simulation Conditions
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Buildings and Roads Distribution
•Total Simulation Area: 33.95km2
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Simulation Result1(Current)• Current Landuse • Manning No.: 32• Total Simulation Area: 33.95km2
: Flood Areas
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Ideas of Landuse Changing
: Green Area
Total “green area increase”: 3km2
Total Simulation Area: 33.95km2
: new urban environment technologies (pavements, roads)
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Boundary Condition after Landuse Changing MIKE21:
◦ Manning Number: Green Area: 25 Other Area: 32◦ Rainfall: Aug. 4 1977 4:00am-6:00pm for all Catchments◦ Tidal Data
MOUSE:◦ Tidal Data at 3 Nodes(outlets)◦ Rainfall: Aug. 4 1997 4:00am-6:00pm for all Catchments◦ Runoff Coefficient: Green Area: 45% Other Area: 75%-80%
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Simulation Result Video (existing conditions)
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Simulation Result Video (Modified)
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Simulation Result2(Proposal)
: Flood Areas
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Comparison
Flood Areas (Before Changing Landuse)
Flood Areas (After Changing Landuse)
: No Green Area added: flood area: 43.7ha (486cells)
:With 336ha Green Area added:Flood area: 11.8ha (132cells)
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
What we achieved◦ Built DEM from contours and manholes using ArcGIS◦ Modeling Incheon catchment with Mike 21 ◦ Simulate sewer flow by MOUSE with many scenarios.◦ Combine 2 DHI model: MOUSE and Mike 21 together.◦ Studied the idea of increasing Green Area to reduce flood in Incheon.
What we got◦ Good chance to study together with many students from different
countries. ◦ Improved teamwork skill. ◦ Understanding the softwares: ArcGIS, Mike 21, Mike Flood, MOUSE…
For their help, special thanks to◦ Professor Philippe Gourbesville - University of Nice Sophia Antipolis ◦ Professor Shie Yui Liong - National University of Singapore◦ Professor Gye-Woom Choi - University of Incheon◦ Anne Gaedeke, University BTU Cottbus
Conclusion
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Enjoy!
2010 team Purple2010 team Purple
Thank You for Your Attention!!