Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

44
Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Transcript of Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Page 1: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with

DisabilitiesAnn Morrison, Ph.D.

Page 2: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

IDEA, 504, and ADA

Page 3: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Legislation Regarding People with Disabilities

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (504)

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)

Page 4: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.
Page 5: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Legislation Regarding People with Disabilities

ADA Section 504 IDEA

1990 1973 1975

Civil rights law prohibiting discrimination

Civil rights law prohibiting discrimination

Provides federal financial assistance to educate students with disabilities

Individuals of any age

Individuals of any age

Children ages 3-21

Not funded Not funded Funded, but only at a fraction of what was promised

Focus on community

Focus on school Focus on student

Page 6: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Americans with Disabilities Act (1990)

A civil rights law to prohibit discrimination solely on the basis of disability in employment, public services, and accommodations.

Protects: Any individual with a disability who: 1. has a physical or mental impairment that substantially

limits one or more life activities; or

2. has a record of such impairment; or

3. is regarded as having such an impairment.

 Note: the person must be qualified for the program, service, or job.

Source: Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund

Page 7: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

A federal Anti-Discrimination Law.

Protects ALL people with a disability that impairs one or more major life activity (learning is one).

Prohibits discrimination in ANY program that receives federal dollars.

Provides accommodations to remove discriminatory barriers.

In education, a “504 Plan” removes barriers to learning and opportunities.

Source: Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund

Page 8: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

Page 9: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Definition of DisabilityIndividuals with Disabilities Education Act

The term `child with a disability' means a child— (i) with mental retardation, hearing impairments

(including deafness), speech or language impairments, visual impairments (including blindness), serious emotional disturbance (referred to in this title as `emotional disturbance'), orthopedic impairments, autism, traumatic brain injury, other health impairments, or specific learning disabilities; and

(ii) who, by reason thereof, needs special education and related services.

Page 10: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Primary Principles of IDEA

Free and Appropriate Public Education

Individualized Education Program

Appropriate evaluation

Least Restrictive Environment

Parent and Student Participation in Decision Making

Procedural Safeguards

Page 11: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Disproportionate Representation

The basic premise of disproportionate representation is that, all other things being similar, students from different groups should be identified for special education services in similar proportions.

For example, if 6% of the Caucasian students in a given district are identified for special education, we would expect about 6% of the African-American students, 6% of the Latino/a students, and 6% of any other group to be identified.

Source: RtI Network

Page 12: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Disproportionate Representation

Disproportionality can be examined for any way of grouping students—by sex, language proficiency, receipt of free or reduced price lunch, or race/ethnicity.

Most commonly tracked for the percentage of particular ethnicities identified as having a Serious Emotional Disability or Intellectual Disability

Example: In the 2002-2003 sy a black student in the U.S. was twice as likely as a white student to be identified as a child with a Significant Emotional Disability and nearly three times as likely to be identified as a child with an Intellectual Disability

Source: CalStat

Page 13: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Free and Appropriate Public Education

Page 14: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Free and Appropriate Public Education

Free requires that the education of each child with a disability must be provided at public expense and at no cost to the child’s parents. The only exception is that incidental fees normally charged to non-disabled students or their parents as part of the regular education program may also be charged to students with disabilities and their parents.

Page 15: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Free and Appropriate Public Education

Appropriate means that each child with a disability is entitled to an education that is “appropriate” for his or her needs. “Appropriate education” is determined on an individual basis and may not be the same for each child with a disability.

Page 16: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Free and Appropriate Public Education

Public refers to the public school system. Children with disabilities, regardless of the nature or severity of their disabilities, have the same right to attend the public schools as their non-disabled peers. The public school system must educate students with disabilities, respond to their individual needs, and help them plan for their future.

Page 17: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Free and Appropriate Public Education

Education - IDEA is an education act that guarantees that eligible children with disabilities will receive a public education that includes special education and related services as directed by the child's Individualized Education Program (IEP), based on the child's individual needs.

Page 18: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Appropriate Evaluation

Page 19: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.
Page 20: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Appropriate Evaluation of Disability to Determine Eligibility for Special Education

Assessment conducted in all areas of suspected disability

By a team of evaluators knowledgeable and trained in the use of the tests and other evaluation materials they use

Employing a variety of sound evaluation materials and procedures selected and administered so as not to be racially or culturally discriminatory Includes reviewing previously collected data

Additional assessment may be conducted without subjecting a child to unnecessary tests and assessments

Including the gathering of relevant information from a variety of sources. Eligibility may not be determined based on any single test

Based on information that is useful instructionally in planning for the child’s education

An appropriate evaluation provides information to be used to determine the child’s eligibility for special education and related services and the educational needs of the child

Page 21: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Student Study Team

Usually made up of at least one teacher, administrator, special education teacher, intervention teacher

Does not include parents

Meets regularly (at least monthly)

Agenda lists students teachers or parents have asked the SST to discuss concerns, current instructional program, consider change to instructional program or referral to special education

Page 22: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Referral to Special Education

Typically made by Student Study Team

Written parent consent for assessment required before testing

Page 23: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Categories of Eligibility

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Deaf-Blindness

Developmental Delay

Hearing Impairment, Including Deafness

Intellectual Disability

Multiple Disabilities

Other Health Impairment

Orthopedic Impairment

Serious Emotional Disability

Specific Learning Disability

Speech or Language Impairment

Traumatic Brain Injury

Visual Impairment, Including Blindness

Page 24: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.
Page 25: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Least Restrictive Environment and Continuum of Services

Page 26: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Special Education Settings, Placements, and Services

“Placement” can refer to a place but can also refer to types of instruction or special education services

IDEA requires school districts to provide students with a “continuum of services” that ranges from “less restrictive” to “more restrictive”

How restrictive a service, setting, or placement is depends on how much time the students spends with “nondisabled peers”

IDEA requires students receives services in their LRE

Page 27: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Continuum of Special Education Services

Page 28: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Considerations for Determination of LRE

Can the disabled child be satisfactorily educated in the general classroom with the use of supplementary aids & services? Factors in this question include:

(a) What steps have been taken to accommodate the child in the general education classroom, including the consideration of a continuum of placement and support services;

(b) A comparison of academic benefits the child will receive in the general education classroom with those that he will receive in the special education classroom;

(c) The child’s overall educational experience in general education, including nonacademic benefits; and

(d) The effect of the presence of the disabled child on the general education classroom.

Page 29: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Other Notes on LRE

A student with disabilities does not have to fail in a less restrictive setting before the IEP Team recommends a more restrictive setting, nor is it required that a student demonstrate achievement at a specific performance level as a prerequisite for placement in a general education class.

A student with a disability should not be removed from an age-appropriate general education classroom solely because of needed modifications to the general educational curriculum.

A student with disabilities is never to be placed in a particular educational setting based solely upon the student’s disabling condition, or on the staff, space and/or services currently available at a school.

Page 30: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Parent and Student Participation in Decision Making

Page 31: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Parent and Student Participation in Decision Making

This principle reinforces the belief that the education of children with disabilities is made more effective by strengthening the role of parents in the special education process. IDEA requires that parents (and students, as appropriate) participate in each step of the special education process. Students must be invited to participate in IEP meetings where transition services are to be discussed. Parent involvement includes: Equal partnership in the decision-making process The right to receive notice of meetings The right to give consent for certain activities such as

evaluations, changes in placement; and release of information to others

Page 32: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Procedural Safeguards

Page 33: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Procedural Safeguards

Procedural Safeguards — Procedural safeguards are a set of activities whose purpose is to ensure that:

The rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected.

All information needed to make decisions about the provision of a free appropriate public education to the student is provided to parents of children with disabilities and to the student when appropriate.

Procedures (mediation and due process) are in place to resolve disagreements between parties.

Page 34: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Procedural Safeguards

Some procedural safeguards under IDEA include the right of parents to: Inspect and review their child’s educational records. Obtain an independent educational evaluation (IEE). Be given written prior notice on matters regarding the identification, evaluation, or

educational placement of their child. Request mediation and an impartial due process hearing. Be given a full explanation of all of the procedural safeguards under IDEA and State

complaint procedures. Appeal the initial hearing decision to the State Education Agency (SEA) if the SEA did not

conduct the hearing; (also the right of the public agency). Have child remain in his/her present educational placement, unless the parent and the

public agency agree otherwise, while administrative or judicial proceedings are pending. Bring a civil action in an appropriate State or Federal court to appeal a final hearing

decision; (also the right of the public agency). Request reasonable attorney’s fees from a court for actions or proceedings brought under

the IDEA under certain circumstances. Give or refuse consent before their child is evaluated or reevaluated. Participate in (and in some cases to appeal) discipline decisions regarding students with

disabilities.

Page 35: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Adaptations

Page 36: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Adaptations

Adaptations

Accommodations• Change how

information is presented or how learning is expressed

Modifications• Change what

information is presented or how learning is expressed

Page 37: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Adaptations = Accommodations + Modifications

Accommodations Changes in course/test presentation, location, timing,

student response or the other attribute which are necessary to provide access for a student with a disability to participate and which do not fundamentally alter or lower the standard or expectations (or invalidate the test or course)

Modifications Changes in course/test presentation, location, timing,

student response or the other attribute which are necessary to provide access for a student with a disability to participate but which fundamentally alter and/or lower the standard or expectations of the test or course

Page 38: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Individualized Education Program

Page 39: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Individualized Education Program

Individualized Education Program (IEP) —IDEA requires that, after drawing upon current evaluation information, the IEP team develop a written document, the IEP, designed to meet the unique educational needs of each student with disabilities.

The IEP is a legal document and schools are legally responsible for implementing the services described in it

Page 40: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

IEP Review

Annual Review: Must be reviewed periodically, but not less than

annually to determine whether the annual goals for the child are being achieved and revised as appropriate

Triennial Evaluation A reevaluation to determine whether the student

continues to qualify for special education services is required periodically, but not less than every three years

Page 41: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Members of the IEP Team

The following people are required to participate in the development of an Individualized Education Program Parent Student required beginning at age 15 General education teacher Special education teacher Individual who can interpret assessment results Related services providers as appropriate (speech

language pathologist, social worker, psychologist, nurse, occupational therapist, physical therapist, vision specialist, hearing specialist, community service agency representative, etc.)

Page 42: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

Main Components of an IEP Document

Documentation of Procedural Safeguards

List of IEP meeting participants

Present level of academic achievement and functional performance

Post-school considerations

Annual goals and objectives

Accommodations and modifications

Extended School Year (ESY)

Participation in and accommodations and modifications in state and district assessments

Recommended placement in the Least Restrictive Environment

Page 43: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

IEP Goals

SPECIFIC: clear descriptions of the knowledge and skills that will be taught and how the child’s progress will be measured.

MEASURABLE: you can count or observe it.

ACTION WORDS: “child will be able to . . .”

REALISTIC / RELEVANT: to child’s unique needs that result from the disability.

TIME-LIMITED: what does the child need to know and be able to do after 1 year of special education?Monitored at regular intervals.

Source: Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund

Page 44: Teaching, Learning, and Access for Students with Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.

IEP Goals and Objectives

Describes what the student will be able to do in one year (goal) and the intermediate steps necessary to achieve the goal (objectives)

Goal: Given first grade material, Jay will read a passage orally at 110-130

wpm with only random errors.

Objectives:1. Given vowels, consonants, digraphs, and 5 common diphthongs, Jay

will say the correct sounds at 30 sounds per minute with no more than 2 errors.

2. Given the 200 most common sight vocabulary words, Jay will read them aloud at 110 wpm with no more than 10 errors.

3. Given first grade material, Jay will read a passage orally at 50-80 wpm with no more than 5 errors.

Source: Bateman and Herr, 2006