TDR Final Report Series No. 37 (2001)

15
TDR Final Report Series No. 37 (2001) Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research Report Series No. 1 (2002)

description

Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research Report Series No. 1 (2002). TDR Final Report Series No. 37 (2001). Cost-performance analysis of malaria control in Henan Province, China. TDR Project ID 950109 & 930413 ( 1994-1998) Professor Xi-Li Liu Principal Investigator - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of TDR Final Report Series No. 37 (2001)

Page 1: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

TDR Final Report Series No. 37 (2001)

Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research Report Series No. 1 (2002)

Page 2: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

TDR Project ID 950109 & 930413 TDR Project ID 950109 & 930413 ((1994-1998)1994-1998)

Professor Xi-Li Liu Principal Investigator

Australian Collaborators:

Dr Sukhan Jackson (Health Economics),

Dr Adrian Sleigh (Epidemiology and Trop Med)

Cost-performance analysis of malaria Cost-performance analysis of malaria control in Henan Province, Chinacontrol in Henan Province, China

Page 3: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

Malaria in HenanMalaria in Henan

•worst province in 1970 (10.2 million cases)

•1971-1984: 280 million treatments, 1.8 billion anti-relapse courses, 2 billion prophylaxis courses

•1981-1992: active case detection, DDT spraying and (later) impregnated bednets

•1993: ‘basic elimination’ (<1 case/10,000 pop/yr), vivax persists in 4 poor counties in the south

Page 4: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

ObjectivesObjectives

1) Measure costs for each malaria control component in Henan

who incurred what costs?

2) Evaluate case-management performance

what was purchased?

3) Assess balance and quality of investment in the control program

what can improve?

Page 5: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

Malaria study Malaria study countiescounties (shaded areas)(shaded areas)

Source: Sleigh et al. 1998 Bull WHO

Page 6: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

MethodsMethods

•cost all government inputs (fixed and variable)

•cost all community inputs (direct and indirect)

•evaluate and cost sample of case-management

least studied aspect in economic appraisals of malaria (epidemiologically important for control outcomes)1,2

1Mills A. The economics of malaria. Proc. of MIM African Malaria Conference, Durban, Sth Africa, March 1999: 92-109

2Mills A. The economics of malaria control. In Targett GAT (ed) Malaria: waiting for the vaccine. Chichester, John Wiley and Sons 1991: 141-168

Page 7: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

Province, County and Province, County and Township government Township government costs measured for 2 yearscosts measured for 2 years

Village “Barefoot doctor” Village “Barefoot doctor” (VD) management, (VD) management, patient-carer costspatient-carer costs

2-year study of 12,325 VD-managed suspected malaria cases (fever, typical sx, no other cause, all reviewed by Liu XL - all vivax based on sx and blood surveillance)

Page 8: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

Costs of malaria controlCosts of malaria control

GovernmentGovernment - invests US$99,970/yr, protects 3.4 million people in transmission zone at $0.03 per head

population blood surveys (surveillance) - 25%

vector surveillance (strategic knowledge) - 12%

case-management (disease-transmission control) - 60%

CommunityCommunity

US$4.18 cost per illness - cases incur 83% of cost (=10 days income; 1/3rd for drugs, >1/3rd due to lost income).

Govt pays 17% of cost per illness and creates treatment system and case-management standards

Page 9: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

Case-management performanceCase-management performance

• quick access to care, confidence in VDs

• VDs slow to treat after diagnosis (40% wait 3-4 days)

• most cases get schizonticide, CQ is available

• treat duration too short (only 1-2 days for 62%)

• many non-malarial drugs (moral hazards)

• primaquine (8 day) course rarely finished

Page 10: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

ConclusionsConclusions

Government stewardship good - maintains system for citizens to purchase care (drug supply, trained village doctors, standards, 17% of case management cost)

and

Maintains surveillance and strategic knowledge

but

Must maintain investment (boost a little?) - or risk resurgence and far greater costs later

Need to improve case-management - a ‘poor buy’ at present - not value for money – poses an epidemiologic risk

Need to resolve primaquine question - justified use?

Page 11: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

Indicator Indicator (costs in US $) CommunityCommunity GovernmentGovernment TotalTotal

Annual cost* (1994-1995) (US$)  

99,790 

Population protected   >3.4 million

Cost per person protected (US$) 0.03 

Cost per case treated (US$) 3.48 (83%) 0.70 (17%) 4.18 (100%)

Government expenditure  

Vector control 

12% 

Blood surveillance 25%

Case-management 60%Contingencies/special projects 4%

Cost per case prevented** 0.58 0.10 0.68

Cost per DALY saved** 30.27 6.09 36.36

Benefit: Cost Ratio** 

3.4 to 1

Page 12: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

Overall ReflectionsOverall Reflections

• Cost-performance method came from managerial economics – broader than CEA, CUA, CBA

• Fits WHO’s focus on health system performance

• Timely in China with partial defunding of many public health programs in the 1990s, like malaria

• Our health system managers and policy makers now know what they are buying for malaria control

• We can advocate evidence-based improvements (case-management) and continued productive investment (beneficial malaria control)

Page 13: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

Malaria reflectionsMalaria reflections

• China had largest Asian malaria burden – now much reduced, has avoided resurgence

• vivax problem typical of the malaria burden in many areas outside of Africa

• We can invest in malaria control more efficiently – improving case-management

• Need information like ours – one of the first such cost-performance studies, and almost the first economic appraisal of malaria case-management

Page 14: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

Some project publications 

• Liu X, Jackson S, Song J & Sleigh A 1996 Malaria control and fever manage-ment in Henan Province. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 1: 112-116.

• Jackson S, Liu XL & Song JD 1996 Socio-economic reforms in China's rural health sector: economic behaviour and incentives of village doctors. International Journal of Social Economics, 23: 409-419.

• Sleigh AC, Liu XL, Jackson S, Li P & Shang LY. 1998 Resurgence of vivax malaria in Henan province, China. Bull of WHO, 76: 265-270

Page 15: TDR Final Report  Series No. 37 (2001)

Some project publications (cont) 

• Zhuang J, Jackson S, Li P, Sleigh AC and Liu X. 1999 Knowledge, attitudes and practices for malaria and its control among residents of an endemic area in Henan, China. Henan Medical Research [Henan Yixue Yanjiu], 8: 267-269 (in Chinese)

• Liu XL, Jackson S and Sleigh AC. 2001 Cost and Performance Analysis for Malaria Control in Henan Province. 2001 Final Report for Projects 930413 and 950109. TDR News (and web site) (In Press)

• Jackson S, Sleigh AC and Liu XL. 2002 Economics of malaria control in China: cost, performance and effectiveness of Henan’s consolidation programme TDR Research Report Publication Series (monograph) (In Press)