T&D spend accelerates, led by high-end technology areas · 1/15/2015 · Satyam Agarwal...
Transcript of T&D spend accelerates, led by high-end technology areas · 1/15/2015 · Satyam Agarwal...
Satyam Agarwal ([email protected]); +91 22 3982 5410
Amit Shah ([email protected]) / Nirav Vasa ([email protected])
15 January 2015
T&D spend accelerates, led by high-end technology areas ‘Make in India’ an important resolve; indigenizing GIS products - next on agenda n During 9MFY15, PWGR’s ordering activity stood at INR127b (up 49% YoY) led by high-end technology areas of HVDC, GIS and SVC (at
44% of project awards, dominated by MNC players). Conventional T&D segment awards have remained flat YoY. Even during FY16, we
expect high-end technology products like HVDC/STATCOM to drive ordering.
n ‘Make in India’ is a serious initiative. Over the last four years, 765kv AIS products have been indigenized and the success is
commendable, given the first such attempt by PWGR to improve the share of domestic manufacturing. We believe that indigenizing
GIS products is next on the agenda, with domestic manufacturing clauses being introduced by PWGR.
n MNC players, mainly Alstom T&D (Not Rated) and ABB India (Neutral), are best positioned to capture the upsides from high-end
products. CRG (Buy) has been expanding its presence in the chain.
High-end technology segment and Substation ordering drive T&D spend During 9MFY15, PWGR’s ordering activity has shown meaningful improvement from the lows in FY14, with ordering activity at INR127b (up 49% YoY). Key takeaways are: i) bulk of the project awards (at 44%) are from high technology segments like HVDC, STATCOM, GIS etc where the competition was largely restricted to MNC players and ii) conventional T&D segment (conductors, insulator, substation, transformer, transmission line) has witnessed ordering of INR72b, flat YoY. During FY16 too, we expect project awards to be again dominated by such projects, including: i) Raigarh – Poglur (~INR250b, +/-600kv, 6gw) HVDC project, and at ~2,500kms is one of the longest transmission networks globally, ii) ~12-14 STATCOM ordering is expected by Dec 2015 (cost ~USD1.2b).
Make in India: a serious initiative; equipment manufacturers - the key beneficiary ‘Make in India’ is a serious initiative of the government to improve the contribution of manufacturing in India through ‘import substitution’ and ‘increased exports’. PWGR has stated that it is fully committed to this initiative of the government and has made it mandatory for T&D players to manufacture certain components in India for orders tendered out in key high-end technology products such as SVC/STATCOM, GIS, 765kv transformers and reactors, HTLS conductors, OPGW and HVDC. Over the last four years, 765kv AIS products have been largely indigenized, and the success is commendable, given the first such attempt by PWGR to improve the share of domestic manufacturing. TBEA commissioned the 765kva transformer/reactor facility in end-CY13 and Toshiba T&D India has commenced construction for the 765kva range products (to be completed by mid-CY15).
Most players are also targeting the export market, and thus India is becoming a manufacturing hub for such equipments. We believe that indigenizing GIS products is next on the agenda, with domestic manufacturing clauses being introduced. Both Alstom T&D India and ABB India have commissioned factories in India, for manufacturing up to 400kva GIS products.
2QFY15 revenue growth in positive territory, margins improve Mid-cap power product companies have reported 22% YoY revenue increase (ttm, as at end-2QFY15); margins have also improved from lows of ~1-1.1% ttm in 1HFY14 to 2.7% ttm in 2QFY15. Margins had peaked at 17-18% in FY08/09 and thus the decline has been substantial, largely led by intense pricing pressure and negative operating leverage. Segmental analysis for large cap companies indicate that ttm revenue growth stood at 8% and ttm EBIT margin stabilizing at 6.6% (versus peak levels of 15% in FY08/09). With product prices bottoming out and competitive environment becoming more disciplined, margins should improve, in our view.
ABB, CRG, Alstom T&D best positioned We believe that there are multiple levers at play, including increased share of high technology products and also the need to correct under-investments in intra-state transmission/distribution segment. MNC players, mainly Alstom T&D (Not Rated) and ABB India (Neutral) are best positioned to capture the upsides from high-end products, given the continuous focus on indigenization. CRG (Buy) has been expanding its presence in the chain, including 765kva Circuit Breakers, Substation Automation, GIS etc and also has a market share of 18% in distribution segment in India.
Investors are advised to refer through disclosures made at the end of the Research Report.
CAPITAL GOODS INSIGHTS
Fulcrum aims to capture and analyze the emerging trends in different sub-segments of the Capital Goods sector. The discussion encompasses various products, companies, and segments that are likely to be impacted or touched by these emerging trends.
15 January 2015 2
CAPITAL GOODS INSIGHTS
Make in India: a serious initiative; equipment manufacturers - the key beneficiary Make in India is a serious initiative of the government to improve the contribution of manufacturing in India, through ‘import substitution’ and ‘increased exports’. PWGR has stated that it is fully committed to this initiative of the government and has made it mandatory for T&D players to manufacture certain components in India for orders tendered out in key high-end technology products such as SVC/STATCOM, GIS, 765kv transformers and reactors, HTLS conductors, OPGW and HVDC. Over the last four years, 765kv AIS products have been largely indigenized and the success is commendable, given the first such attempt by PWGR to improve the share of domestic manufacturing. We believe that indigenizing GIS products is next on the agenda, with domestic manufacturing clauses being introduced. Exhibit 1: PWGR: revisions to procurement clauses to support Make in India initiative Products PWGR: Make in India clause
SVC and STATCOM packages At least one SVC/STATCOM to be sourced from India
765KV class Transformer/Reactor
Foreign bidders to supply at least one transformer/Reactor from India
GIS Equipment 400kv: Indian subsidiaries of MNCs may also supply from their Indian factories
765kv bidders to set up manufacturing facilities in India
HTLS Conductors, OPGW and HVDC
Thrust on indigenization/Indian collaboration
Source: MOSL, PWGR
765kva AIS products have been successfully indigenized; India can be an export hub for such products n 765kva products were initially introduced in India during FY09, and in the initial
three years till FY11, imported products (particularly from Koreans and Chinese players) had a dominant market share of ~70%+. The mandatory domestic manufacturing clause was introduced by PWGR in FY11, and since then the manufacturing has been largely indigenized.
n Over the last four years, several companies have set up such facilities including ABB, CRG, Alstom T&D, TBEA etc. In CY11, ABB had improved the localization content for 765kva products, while TBEA commissioned the manufacturing facility in Vadodara in end-CY13. Toshiba T&D India has also started construction of a new line to manufacture 765kva transformers and the facility is expected to be commissioned in mid-CY15. The success is commendable, given the first such attempt by PWGR to improve the share of domestic manufacturing.
n Post the imposition of mandatory domestic manufacturing clause, Korean players like Hyundai and Hyosung had completely withdrawn from the market since end-CY12. Siemens had also withdrawn from the 765kva transformer space, post the initial unsuccessful bids in FY08/09.
n Over the last three years, pricing in both reactors and transformers have also bounced back sharply from the low levels in CY12 (when competitive intensity was severe) and have now stabilized. In the past, CRG maintained that the Bhopal factory (765kva) contributed ~12-14% EBITDA margin, and thus profitability levels based on domestic manufacturing has also reached healthy levels.
15 January 2015 3
CAPITAL GOODS INSIGHTS
Exhibit 2: Key bidders for 765kva/500mva transformers; Koreans have vacated the market
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Exhibit 3: 765kva transformer prices are stabilizing, up from the low levels in 2012 (INRM/mva)
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Attempt to indigenize GIS products - next on agenda n GIS has witnessed increased traction, with project awards of INR27b in FY13/14
and another INR18b in 9MFY15, contributing to 11% of the cumulative project awards by PWGR. Of this, bulk of the orders has been bagged by Korean and Chinese players: Hyosung (Korea) at INR20b, Pinggao (Korea) INR7b and North East Electric Group (China) INR5b.
n PWGR had recently revised PQ norms: i) 400kv products - Indian subsidiaries of MNCs can supply from their Indian factories and ii) 765kv products - mandatory domestic manufacturing is being insisted. This should support domestic manufacturing, going forward.
n Both Alstom T&D India and ABB India have commissioned factories in India to manufacture up to 400kva GIS products. Alstom T&D has recently received an order of INR2.3b for 400/220kv Betul GIS substation project in Dec 2014 and is the first large-sized project wins in GIS from PWGR. Also, ABB commissioned the GIS factory in Nov 2013 and supplied the first 420kva GIS in 1QFY15. Company is still not prequalified by PWGR for bidding, with three instances of bids being rejected over the last year. Going forward, we believe that Hyosung, TBEA etc may also set up manufacturing facilities in India for GIS products. Toshiba globally has a market share of 28% in GIS products, and thus could add a manufacturing facility in India.
n Given the land availability constraints (for expansion of substations) and also lower price levels for GIS products, we expect demand to improve meaningfully. Several SEBs should also start to award GIS products and that could be an important trigger.
0.24
0.27
0.22 0.
23
0.21
0.17
0.22
0.21
0.23
0.20 0.20
0.23 0.24
Mar
08
Mar
09
Mar
11
Sep
11
Oct
11
Feb
12
Mar
12
Jun
12
Nov
12
Dec
12
Jan
13
Apr
13
Jan
14
Stabilizing prices
15 January 2015 4
CAPITAL GOODS INSIGHTS
Exhibit 4: Ordering traction picks up in high technology areas, GIS contributes ~13-15% of PWGR awards in FY14/9MFY15 (% share in PWGR awards)
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Exhibit 5: Hyosung has dominated the GIS market segment; imported products have a market share of ~80%+ (market share during FY13-9MFY15)
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Market share of imported products decline in PWGR orders We believe with the implementation of Make in India clause by PWGR, domestic players and MNC companies with local manufacturing facilities stand to benefit. Increased imports, particularly from China/Korea over the last five to six years, have been an area of concern in several product segments. Key beneficiaries include ABB, Alstom, BHEL etc.
Exhibit 6: Recent high technology product wins (like HVDC etc) have also been bagged by European players in JV with local arms
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Exhibit 7: Market share of Chinese/Korean players has declined in 9MFY15 (% of PWGR awards)
Source: MOSL, PWGR
1 2 1 2 7 15 13
- -
29
-
15 -
26
1 -
0
-
0
-
4
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 YTD
GIS HVDC SVC
Hyosung 45
Pinggao, 13
New Northeast,
24
Others, 18
0
20
40
60
80
100
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 9m FY15
China Korea Europe (incl JVs) Others India
0.9
10.2
2.27.1 9.2 8.3
6.03.6
4.5
1.3
1.71.9
9.3
3.6
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
9m
FY15
China Korea
15 January 2015 5
CAPITAL GOODS INSIGHTS
PWGR project awards improve, led by high technology areas During 9MFY15, PWGR’s ordering activity has shown an improvement, with project awards at INR127b (up 49% YoY), largely aided by the base effect and also high-end technology products (GIS, HVDC, SVC etc). While the acceleration has been encouraging, ttm project awards at INR150b, is still down 47% from peak levels of INR284b (ttm, 1QFY13). Key takeaways are: n Order awards led by high technology areas: Key project awards in 9MFY15 have
been: i) Champa - Kurukshetra HVDC order of INR33b to Alstom Grid, ii) STATCOM orders of INR4.9b to Siemens AG (first such project award), iii) GIS products of INR17.6b. Cumulatively, these segments contributed to 44% of project awards during 9MFY15. Thus, incrementally a large part of the ordering is skewed towards high technology projects including HVDC, STATCOMs, WAM, GIS etc. In the recent concall, Alstom T&D stated that the growth in PWGR awards in FY15 will be led by high technology areas; excluding them, the awards will be muted and similar to FY14 levels.
n Transmission tower order awards at INR40b (stable YoY), competitive intensity remains stable: Transmission tower packages project awards stand at INR40b in 9MFY15 (stable YoY) and are largely towards private IPPs like Lalitpur (1,320mw), NCC Power (1,320mw), IL&FS (1,200mw) etc. Competitive intensity remains stable with six bidders averaging in most bids versus high levels of 12-14 bids in FY12. Most companies have been guiding for stable margins in the segment.
Exhibit 8: Project awards (ttm, INR b) have improved from low levels
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Exhibit 9: 9MFY15 awards are up 48% YoY (quarterly awards, INR b)
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Incremental awards led by high technology areas; competition restricted n We expect Raigarh – Poglur (Tamil Nadu, +/-600kv, 6gw) project to be possibly
awarded in FY16, and at ~2,500kms is one of the longest transmission networks globally. Also, few more projects are expected in the next two to three years, which includes the 2.5gw West – North Connection and Sri Lanka - India connection. Since FY11, PWGR has awarded three HVDC projects aggregating INR111b, with two projects being won by Alstom T&D and one by ABB-BHEL. We note that the localization levels in both projects are likely at ~35-45%, given the pre-qualification norms, and the quantum is expected to improve. Bidders for the last project were ABB, Alstom T&D and BHEL.
142
133
124
119
117
119
116
184
177 19
724
822
7 284
277
247
162
130
123
107
109
107 14
015
0
1QFY
10
3QFY
10
1QFY
11
3QFY
11
1QFY
12
3QFY
12
1QFY
13
3QFY
13
1QFY
14
3QFY
14
1QFY
15
3QFY
15
15
27
36 67
12
18
27
63
10
20
24
130
3 39 76
108
61
32 47
22
29
24
32
24
27
58
42
1QFY
09
3QFY
09
1QFY
10
3QFY
10
1QFY
11
3QFY
11
1QFY
12
3QFY
12
1QFY
13
3QFY
13
1QFY
14
3QFY
14
1QFY
15
3QFY
15
15 January 2015 6
CAPITAL GOODS INSIGHTS
n In SVC, Siemens AG won the first such order for three substations by PWGR at INR4.9b. PWGR plans to award 12-14 STATCOM projects by Dec 2015, with each at ~USD100m, and thus the opportunity pie is significant. PWGR had rejected the bids of Hyosung, Toshiba, China EPRI Science & Technology and Rongxin Power for SVC project, and thus the bidders were ABB, Siemens and Alstom T&D.
n Power Ministry has recently nominated PWGR to implement eight transmission projects worth INR360b, instead of inviting competitive bids, to execute the projects "under compressed time schedule". The key project is the Raigarh – Poglur (Tamil Nadu, +/-600kv, 4gw) HVDC at a cost of INR250b+. In addition, another INR180-200b of projects will be awarded through the competitive route.
Exhibit 10: PWGR ordering: segmental composition (% share, 9MFY15), ordering led by high technology areas
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Exhibit 11: PWGR ordering: Indian/European players (with local arms) dominate (% share, 9MFY15)
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Transmission tower order awards improve, competitive intensity stable Exhibit 12: Transmission tower: competitive intensity remains stable with 6 bidders averaging in most bids, v/s high levels of 12-14 bids in FY12
Source: MOSL, PWGR
HVDC, 26
Towers, 32
SVC, 4Substation,
10
GIS, 14
Others, 29China, 7
India, 58
Korea, 5
Europe (incl JV), 30
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
30
50
70
90
110
130
Apr
-08
Aug
-08
Dec
-08
Apr
-09
Aug
-09
Dec
-09
Apr
-10
Aug
-10
Dec
-10
Apr
-11
Aug
-11
Dec
-11
Apr
-12
Aug
-12
Dec
-12
Apr
-13
Aug
-13
Dec
-13
Apr
-14
Aug
-14
Dec
-14
Awards (ttm, INR B, LHS) Avg Bidders (Nos/month)
15 January 2015 7
CAPITAL GOODS INSIGHTS
Exhibit 13: 9MFY15 project wins largely by frontline players (% of total)
Source: Company, PWGR
Exhibit 14: Transmission tower awards at ~30-40% of PWGR awards
Source: Company, PWGR
Substation ordering indicates strong traction, competitive intensity stable
Exhibit 15: 9MFY15 project wins indicate BHEL as the key player (% of total)
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Exhibit 16: Substation awards at ~8-17% of PWGR awards
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Exhibit 17: Competitive intensity reduces significantly in recent time with average 3-4 bidders per project
Source: MOSL, PWGR
Gammon 13
KEC , 9
Others, 13
L&T, 13Kalpataru, 7
Tata projects, 21
EMC Ltd, 7
32.836.9 35.2
42.6 43.0 40.231.6
47,4
02
44,0
03
64,5
26
96,4
54
69,4
83
43,6
06
39,8
36
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
ytd
FY15
% of Total INR M
Techno Electric, 9
BHEL, 22
Alstom T&D, 14
EMCO, 19
Mcnally Bharat, 10
Others, 25
23,809 18,522 15,994
27,164
14,670 9,545 12,212
16.5 15.5
8.7
12.0
9.1 8.8 9.6
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 YTD
INR m % of Total T&D spend
0
5
10
15
20
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
Apr
-08
Aug
-08
Dec
-08
Apr
-09
Aug
-09
Dec
-09
Apr
-10
Aug
-10
Dec
-10
Apr
-11
Aug
-11
Dec
-11
Apr
-12
Aug
-12
Dec
-12
Apr
-13
Aug
-13
Dec
-13
Apr
-14
Aug
-14
Dec
-14
Project awards (INR M) Bidders (Nos)
15 January 2015 8
CAPITAL GOODS INSIGHTS
T&D spend to accelerate: SEBs/grid efficiency provides avenues Emerging new growth areas to support T&D spending While PWGR’s ordering is likely to plateau at ~INR170-200b pa in the medium term, after bouncing back from the lows of INR109b in FY14, we believe there exists upside possibilities from i) Green Energy Corridors (investment plan INR425b, process initiated for technical and financial assistance) and expect few renewable energy grid project awards in FY15, ii) Intra-state transmission projects (as strengthening of the sub-transmission network in states is an important part of the chain, and investments during the Eleventh Plan has been just ~45-50% of the requirements) and iii) Substation automation (particularly post the blackouts in July 2012) including concentrators/PMUs, FACTS etc for grid stability. Desert 2050 Plan also entails renewable energy capacity addition of 300gw, and transmission spending of INR4.5t, of which INR198b is targeted in the Thirteenth Plan (FY18-22). We note that few of these project awards should possibly accelerate. Several of these projects will necessitate the need for technology upgradation by Indian companies, while MNC players would benefit on the back of technological edge. In 4QFY14, PWGR awarded orders for supply of ~1,300 PMUs to Alstom (INR3.6b) and in 1HFY15 awarded SVC for three substations to Siemens (INR4.9b). Another important demand driver, particularly for large players, is that the share of ultra-high voltage segment in the Twelfth Plan is increasing to 30-32% from 5-7% earlier, and given that there are few players pre-qualified in this segment, the business economics should possibly improve.
Exhibit 18: HT Switchgears have witnessed traction, led by PWGR spending (ttm, % YoY)
Source: IEEMA, MOSL
Exhibit 19: Distribution Transformers growth rates higher than Power Transformers (ttm, % YoY)
Source: IEEMA, MOSL
2QFY15 revenue growth in positive territory, margins improve n Mid-cap power product companies have reported 22% YoY revenue increase
(ttm, as at end-2QFY15); margins have also improved from a lows of ~1-1.1% ttm in 1HFY14 to 2.7% ttm in 2QFY15. Margins had peaked at 17-18% in FY08/09 and thus the decline has been substantial, largely led by intense pricing pressure and negative operating leverage.
n Segmental analysis for the large cap companies indicates that ttm revenue growth stood at 8%, and ttm EBIT margins stabilizing at 6.6% (versus peak levels of 15% in FY08/09). With product prices bottoming out and competitive environment becoming more disciplined, margins should improve.
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Jan-
09M
ay-0
9Se
p-09
Jan-
10M
ay-1
0Se
p-10
Jan-
11M
ay-1
1Se
p-11
Jan-
12M
ay-1
2Se
p-12
Jan-
13M
ay-1
3Se
p-13
Jan-
14M
ay-1
4Se
p-14
HT - Switchgear LT - Switchgear
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Dec
-08
Mar
-09
Jun-
09Se
p-09
Dec
-09
Mar
-10
Jun-
10Se
p-10
Dec
-10
Mar
-11
Jun-
11Se
p-11
Dec
-11
Mar
-12
Jun-
12Se
p-12
Dec
-12
Mar
-13
Jun-
13Se
p-13
Dec
-13
Mar
-14
Jun-
14Se
p-14
Distribution Transformers, ttm- % YOY [LHS]Power Transformer, ttm- % YoY
15 January 2015 9
CAPITAL GOODS INSIGHTS
Management commentary has been positive and the industry should bounce back to a much more normative growth level. Also, transformer prices have stabilized, albeit at lower levels. Competitive intensity is showing signs of moderation, given the poor execution track record of new entrants/stringent evaluation by PWGR, which includes a two-stage bidding process/decline in participation by Koreans, given the requirement of domestic manufacturing.
Exhibit 20: Power products revenue improve, for both large cap/mid- cap companies (% YoY, ttm basis)
Source: Company, MOSL
Exhibit 21: Margins have also shown signs of stabilization, improvement will be a function of operating leverage
Source: Company, MOSL
Exhibit 22: Valuation summary Mcap CMP EPS (INR) P/E (x) EV/EBITDA (x) RoE (%) Company USD INR FY15E FY16E FY17E FY15E FY16E FY17E FY15E FY16E FY17E FY15E FY16E FY17E
ABB# 4.3 1,261 11.2 17.1 27.4 112.7 73.8 46.1 47.9 36.3 25.7 8.6 12.5 18.2
BHEL 10.5 267 7.9 12.7 18.2 33.6 20.9 14.7 18.9 11.2 7.3 5.8 8.7 11.5
Crompton 1.9 187 5.3 10.3 14.5 35.1 18.1 12.8 17.3 11.8 8.4 8.7 15.3 18.8
Cummins 4.0 885 23.8 27.2 33.1 37.2 32.5 26.8 31.5 27.8 22.9 24.1 25.2 28.1
L&T 23.4 1,564 45.0 57.2 80.1 34.8 27.3 19.5 21.0 18.4 14.0 13.6 14.0 16.2
Siemens## 5.4 945 8.7 14.1 18.7 108.5 66.9 50.6 54.7 34.8 27.7 7.4 11.2 13.9
Thermax 2.0 1,031 22.9 32.7 48.4 44.9 31.5 21.3 27.7 19.5 13.5 13.0 17.1 22.1
Havells 2.7 265 8.6 10.2 13.1 30.9 26.0 20.2 19.7 15.4 12.2 27.8 28.1 30.1
Voltas 1.3 252 10.3 13.6 16.6 24.4 18.6 15.1 19.4 14.4 11.2 15.6 17.9 19.0
BEL 4.2 3,268 120.5 143.6 167.9 27.1 22.8 19.5 22.0 16.9 13.9 12.4 13.3 13.9
KEC Internatl. 0.4 92 5.8 9.1 13.2 16.0 10.1 7.0 7.1 4.9 3.9 10.1 14.3 17.9
VA Tech Wabag 0.7 1,587 48.1 64.4 85.0 33.0 24.6 18.7 16.7 12.6 9.7 13.5 15.9 17.9
# Year end December; ## Year end September Source: Company, MOSL
-30%-15%
0%15%30%45%60%
2QFY
08
4QFY
08
2QFY
09
4QFY
09
2QFY
10
4QFY
10
2QFY
11
4QFY
11
2QFY
12
4QFY
12
2QFY
13
4QFY
13
2QFY
14
4QFY
14
2QFY
15
Large Caps Mid Caps
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
2QFY
08
4QFY
08
2QFY
09
4QFY
09
2QFY
10
4QFY
10
2QFY
11
4QFY
11
2QFY
12
4QFY
12
2QFY
13
4QFY
13
2QFY
14
4QFY
14
2QFY
15
Large Caps Mid Caps
15 January 2015 10
CAPITAL GOODS INSIGHTS
N O T E S
15 January 2015 11
CAPITAL GOODS INSIGHTS
Disclosures This document has been prepared by Motilal Oswal Securities Limited (hereinafter referred to as Most) to provide information about the company(ies) and/sector(s), if any, covered in the report and may be distributed by it and/or its affiliated company(ies). This report is for personal information of the selected recipient/s and does not construe to be any investment, legal or taxation advice to you. This research report does not constitute an offer, invitation or inducement to invest in securities or other investments and Motilal Oswal Securities Limited (hereinafter referred as MOSt) is not soliciting any action based upon it. This report is not for public distribution and has been furnished to you solely for your general information and should not be reproduced or redistributed to any other person in any form. This report does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients. Before acting on any advice or recommendation in this material, investors should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. The price and value of the investments referred to in this material and the income from them may go down as well as up, and investors may realize losses on any investments. Past performance is not a guide for future performance, future returns are not guaranteed and a loss of original capital may occur.
MOSt and its affiliates are a full-service, integrated investment banking, investment management, brokerage and financing group. We and our affiliates have investment banking and other business relationships with a some companies covered by our Research Department. Our research professionals may provide input into our investment banking and other business selection processes. Investors should assume that MOSt and/or its affiliates are seeking or will seek investment banking or other business from the company or companies that are the subject of this material and that the research professionals who were involved in preparing this material may educate investors on investments in such business. The research professionals responsible for the preparation of this document may interact with trading desk personnel, sales personnel and other parties for the purpose of gathering, applying and interpreting information. Our research professionals are paid on the profitability of MOSt which may include earnings from investment banking and other business.
MOSt generally prohibits its analysts, persons reporting to analysts, and members of their households from maintaining a financial interest in the securities or derivatives of any companies that the analysts cover. Additionally, MOSt generally prohibits its analysts and persons reporting to analysts from serving as an officer, director, or advisory board member of any companies that the analysts cover. Our salespeople, traders, and other professionals or affiliates may provide oral or written market commentary or trading strategies to our clients that reflect opinions that are contrary to the opinions expressed herein, and our proprietary trading and investing businesses may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations expressed herein. In reviewing these materials, you should be aware that any or all of the foregoing among other things, may give rise to real or potential conflicts of interest. MOSt and its affiliated company(ies), their directors and employees and their relatives may; (a) from time to time, have a long or short position in, act as principal in, and buy or sell the securities or derivatives thereof of companies mentioned herein. (b) be engaged in any other transaction involving such securities and earn brokerage or other compensation or act as a market maker in the financial instruments of the company(ies) discussed herein or act as an advisor or lender/borrower to such company(ies) or may have any other potential conflict of interests with respect to any recommendation and other related information and opinions.; however the same shall have no bearing whatsoever on the specific recommendations made by the analyst(s), as the recommendations made by the analyst(s) are completely independent of the views of the affiliates of MOSt even though there might exist an inherent conflict of interest in some of the stocks mentioned in the research report Reports based on technical and derivative analysis center on studying charts company's price movement, outstanding positions and trading volume, as opposed to focusing on a company's fundamentals and, as such, may not match with a report on a company's fundamental analysis. In addition MOST has different business segments / Divisions with independent research separated by Chinese walls catering to different set of customers having various objectives, risk profiles, investment horizon, etc, and therefore may at times have different contrary views on stocks sectors and markets.
Unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either whole or partial) of this information, is prohibited. The person accessing this information specifically agrees to exempt MOSt or any of its affiliates or employees from, any and all responsibility/liability arising from such misuse and agrees not to hold MOSt or any of its affiliates or employees responsible for any such misuse and further agrees to hold MOSt or any of its affiliates or employees free and harmless from all losses, costs, damages, expenses that may be suffered by the person accessing this information due to any errors and delays. The information contained herein is based on publicly available data or other sources believed to be reliable. Any statements contained in this report attributed to a third party represent MOSt’s interpretation of the data, information and/or opinions provided by that third party either publicly or through a subscription service, and such use and interpretation have not been reviewed by the third party. This Report is not intended to be a complete statement or summary of the securities, markets or developments referred to in the document. While we would endeavor to update the information herein on reasonable basis, MOSt and/or its affiliates are under no obligation to update the information. Also there may be regulatory, compliance, or other reasons that may prevent MOSt and/or its affiliates from doing so. MOSt or any of its affiliates or employees shall not be in any way responsible and liable for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report. MOSt or any of its affiliates or employees do not provide, at any time, any express or implied warranty of any kind, regarding any matter pertaining to this report, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement. The recipients of this report should rely on their own investigations.
This report is intended for distribution to institutional investors. Recipients who are not institutional investors should seek advice of their independent financial advisor prior to taking any investment decision based on this report or for any necessary explanation of its contents.
Most and it’s associates may have managed or co-managed public offering of securities, may have received compensation for investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services, may have received any compensation for products or services other than investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services from the subject company in the past 12 months. Most and it’s associates have not received any compensation or other benefits from the subject company or third party in connection with the research report. Subject Company may have been a client of Most or its associates during twelve months preceding the date of distribution of the research report
MOSt and/or its affiliates and/or employees may have interests/positions, financial or otherwise of over 1 % at the end of the month immediately preceding the date of publication of the research in the securities mentioned in this report. To enhance transparency, MOSt has incorporated a Disclosure of Interest Statement in this document. This should, however, not be treated as endorsement of the views expressed in the report.
Motilal Oswal Securities Limited is under the process of seeking registration under SEBI (Research Analyst) Regulations, 2014.
There are no material disciplinary action that been taken by any regulatory authority impacting equity research analysis activities
Analyst Certification The views expressed in this research report accurately reflect the personal views of the analyst(s) about the subject securities or issues, and no part of the compensation of the research analyst(s) was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations and views expressed by research analyst(s) in this report. The research analysts, strategists, or research associates principally responsible for preparation of MOSt research receive compensation based upon various factors, including quality of research, investor client feedback, stock picking, competitive factors and firm revenues
Disclosure of Interest Statement Companies where there is interest § Analyst ownership of the stock No § Served as an officer, director or employee No
Regional Disclosures (outside India) This report is not directed or intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity resident in a state, country or any jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject MOSt & its group companies to registration or licensing requirements within such jurisdictions.
For U.S. Motilal Oswal Securities Limited (MOSL) is not a registered broker - dealer under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the"1934 act") and under applicable state laws in the United States. In addition MOSL is not a registered investment adviser under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act" and together with the 1934 Act, the "Acts), and under applicable state laws in the United States. Accordingly, in the absence of specific exemption under the Acts, any brokerage and investment services provided by MOSL, including the products and services described herein are not available to or intended for U.S. persons.
This report is intended for distribution only to "Major Institutional Investors" as defined by Rule 15a-6(b)(4) of the Exchange Act and interpretations thereof by SEC (henceforth referred to as "major institutional investors"). This document must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not major institutional investors. Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is only available to major institutional investors and will be engaged in only with major institutional investors. In reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 15a-6 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and interpretations thereof by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in order to conduct business with Institutional Investors based in the U.S., MOSL has entered into a chaperoning agreement with a U.S. registered broker-dealer, Motilal Oswal Securities International Private Limited. ("MOSIPL"). Any business interaction pursuant to this report will have to be executed within the provisions of this chaperoning agreement.
The Research Analysts contributing to the report may not be registered /qualified as research analyst with FINRA. Such research analyst may not be associated persons of the U.S. registered broker-dealer, MOSIPL, and therefore, may not be subject to NASD rule 2711 and NYSE Rule 472 restrictions on communication with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account.
For Singapore Motilal Oswal Capital Markets Singapore Pte Limited is acting as an exempt financial advisor under section 23(1)(f) of the Financial Advisers Act(FAA) read with regulation 17(1)(d) of the Financial Advisors Regulations and is a subsidiary of Motilal Oswal Securities Limited in India. This research is distributed in Singapore by Motilal Oswal Capital Markets Singapore Pte Limited and it is only directed in Singapore to accredited investors, as defined in the Financial Advisers Regulations and the Securities and Futures Act (Chapter 289), as amended from time to time. In respect of any matter arising from or in connection with the research you could contact the following representatives of Motilal Oswal Capital Markets Singapore Pte Limited: Anosh Koppikar Kadambari Balachandran Email : [email protected] Email : [email protected] Contact : (+65)68189232 Contact : (+65) 68189233 / 65249115 Office Address : 21 (Suite 31),16 Collyer Quay,Singapore 04931
Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd
Motilal Oswal Tower, Level 9, Sayani Road, Prabhadevi, Mumbai 400 025 Phone: +91 22 3982 5500 E-mail: [email protected]
BHEL
12 January 2015 32
CAPITAL GOODS GALLERY
Detailed Sector Updates Detailed Company Update
Special Reports
Initiating Coverage
Spotlights Fulcrum (Capital Goods Insights)