TCE NAPL Remediation in Active Alleyway - Arlington TX
Transcript of TCE NAPL Remediation in Active Alleyway - Arlington TX
7/31/2019 TCE NAPL Remediation in Active Alleyway - Arlington TX
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tce-napl-remediation-in-active-alleyway-arlington-tx 1/2
ARL13 ShortVProjEx 090512 aif
Remediation of TCE NAPL in Active Alleyway Arlington, Texas
Project Summary
TRS Group, Inc. (TRS) completed a standard Fixed Price Remediation (SFPR) of trichloroethene (TCE) in soil in Arlington, TX using electrical resistance heating (ERH) in 2012. The system incorporated 19 electrodes with horizontal vaporrecovery (VR) wells to treat a soil volume of approximately 4,155 cubic yards (yd3) located between two active buidlings.
Active subsurface heating extended from approximately 5 feet below grade surface (ft bgs) to just below the bedrock surface.
The goal of the ERH remediation was to removal NAPL and reduce the average soil concentration of TCE to 10 mg/kg. Post ERHsoil sample analyses indicated a removal efficiency of 95.5%.
Background
The treatment region was located in a narrow alleybetween Building 2 and Building 6, see Figure 1.
The ERH treatment area measured approximately5,100 square feet in surface area. The targetedheating zone ranged from approximately 5 ft bgsand extended to between 25 ft. to 32.5 ft bgs asdetermined by the bedrock interface. The averagedepth was 27 ft bgs and the resulting treatmentvolume was approximately 4,155 yd3.
The contamination was identified during duediligence sampling supporting a pending propertytransaction, however the source is unknown.
In September 2007, prior to ERH treatment, soilsamples collected from locations within thetreatment area indicated TCE concentrations up to
2,700 mg/kg at 25 ft bgs. The average pre-ERHTCE concentration was 83 mg/kg.
The lithology consisted of 23 to 24 ft of clay andsilty clay overlying shale. In some locations, thebottom foot or two of unconsolidated material wasmore-permeable silty sand. Groundwater at thesite was reported to range from 3 ft to greater than20 ft bgs.
System Construction/Operations
The ERH system consisted of 19 vertical electrodeswith co-located horizontal vapor recovery wells toprevent unnecessary entrainment of groundwater.
The electrodes were completed to variable depthintervals to the weathered shale and six electrodeswere installed two feet into the weather shalebedrock. The top of the conductive interval started at 7 ft bgs. Subsurface temperatures were measured at five temperaturemonitoring points (TMPs) with thermocouples spaced at 4-foot depth intervals through the heated volume. The ERH systemconsisted of a custom 500 kW power control unit (PCU) and condenser/cooling tower unit, and a 25 horsepower blower forvapor recovery. Vapor treatment consisted of two 2,000 pound granular activated carbon vessels (VGAC) installed in series.
System operations began in the fall of 2011 following a two-week start-up. Operations were complete in less than fourmonths. TRS applied 699,000 kWh of energy to compelte the remediation. The average rate of energy applied was 230 kW.The TCE NAPL/groundwater boiling point of 85ºC was reached after 45 days of operations during which the rate of greatestmass removal occurred. Groundwater boiling was reached after 90 days of operations. Based on the vapor concentration data
Figure 1. Arlington ERH Treatment Area
7/31/2019 TCE NAPL Remediation in Active Alleyway - Arlington TX
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tce-napl-remediation-in-active-alleyway-arlington-tx 2/2
ARL13 ShortVProjEx 090512 aif
©2012- TRS Group®, Inc. All rights reserved.
collected, TRS estimates that approximately 2,047 pounds of VOCs were physically recovered from the subsurface by theapplication of ERH.
Interim soil sampling analytical results showed that 68% of the treatment area had reached the cleanup goals. TRS removed13 of 19 electrodes from service after 13.5 weeks in order to concentrate energy on the remaining two areas with elevatedTCE concentrations. After another 3 weeks of ERH opeations, the remaining 6 electrodes were taken off line.
Results
Soil sampling and analysis showed that average concentrations of TCE in soil decreased over 95.5% in the treatment volume
following the application of ERH. The average post-ERH Freon 113 concentration for all soil samples in the treatment volume was0.05 mg/kg, which correlates to a 99.9% reduction. Figure 2 illustrates the average TCE and Freon concentrations in soil preand post ERH remediation.
Figure 2. TCE and Freon Soil Concentrations Pre and Post ERH
Summary
Site Geology and Hydrology 23 to 24 ft of clay and silty clay overlying shale. Groundwater was reported to range from 3 ft to > than 20 ft below grade surface (bgs).
Treatment Area Size, Volume, and Depth 5,100 ft 2 ; 4,155 yd
3 ; 5 to 32.5 ft bgs
Beginning Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Soil TCE 83 ppm; Freon 52 ppm
Remedial Goal(s) Soil TCE 10 ppm; NA for Freon
Average Concentrations Achieved TCE 3 ppm; Freon <1 ppm
Period of Performance 17 weeks of operation
Contract Terms Standard Fixed Price Remediation
TRS Contact InformationMr. David Fleming, (425) 396-4266, [email protected] , www.thermalrs.com