Multinational Corporations, Stateless Income, and Tax Havens
Tax Havens and the Taxation of Transnational Corporations · 2013-02-04 · Tax Havens and the...
Transcript of Tax Havens and the Taxation of Transnational Corporations · 2013-02-04 · Tax Havens and the...
Tax Havens and the Taxation of Transnational Corporations
Markus Henn Project Officer Financial Markets,
World Economy, Ecology & Development – WEEDCoordinator, Tax Justice Network GermanyContact: [email protected]
9 January 2013, Berlin, HWR
Transnational corporations (TNCs): Who gets taxes?
2
Parent Parent company company
Subsidiary Subsidiary companycompany
Country A Country B
WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
How many companies fit into ONE house?
3 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013source: www.guardian.co.uk
200.000200.0001209 Orange Street, Wilmington (Delaware)1209 Orange Street, Wilmington (Delaware)
Tax havens / Secrecy jurisdictions / Offshore centers
= 1. (ALMOST) NO TAXES= 1. (ALMOST) NO TAXES
= 2. INTRANSPARENCY= 2. INTRANSPARENCY
= 3. NO/LITTLE REGULATION= 3. NO/LITTLE REGULATION
4 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013source: http://www.seychellescompany.com
5 source: www.financialsecrecyindex.com WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
$1-1,6 trillionillicit financial flows per year
growth since 1990ies: 9 percent per year
$350-900 USD per year from developing countries
$21-32 trillion hidden in tax havens
WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.20136 Sources: TJN / Raymond Bayker, GFI
Production shift
• Production shifted to low-tax countries (or preferential tax zones)
• Revenue losses: states cannot tax beneficiaries, tax competition
• Inequality: big and transnational companies favoured
• Wrong incentives: investments determined by tax advantages
7 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
Parent Parent company company
Subsidiary Subsidiary companycompany
Country A: high corporate taxhigh corporate tax
Country B: low corporate taxlow corporate tax
Photo: Tiia Monto / Wikimedia Commons
Tax competition: tax rates for corporate profits
8 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
But: Tax base broadened, thus revenues more stable than rates suggest (see e.g. Kumar, M. / Quinn, D.: Globalization and Corporate Taxation, IMF Working Paper 12/252, Oct. 2012)
JapanUSA
GermanyItaly
FranceSpain
NetherlandsBelgium
UKIreland
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
19822004
Paper shift: hybrid entity mismatch
• Abuse of entities' different treatment: One country (B) treats a hybrid entity as “non transparent” and thus taxable, the other (A) as „transparent“ and non-taxable; this mismatch can be abused by a loan
9 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
Parent Parent companycompany
Subsidiary Subsidiary companycompany
Country A: interest: deductibleinterest: deductible
Country B (consolidated):interest: deductible interest: deductible
• Similar model with dual resident corporations
Hybrid Hybrid entityentity
loan
Paper shift: hybrid financial instrument mismatch
• Abuse of financial instruments' different treatment: a company can shape its structure in a way that it can abuse different tax and deductability conditions for so-called hybrid financial instruments
10 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
Parent Parent company company
Subsidiary Subsidiary companycompany
Country A: Equity: dividend, Equity: dividend,
not taxednot taxed
Country B:Loan: interest, Loan: interest,
deductibledeductible
e.g. preferred shares
• Similar model: sale and repurchase agreement
Paper shift: transfer pricing (abuse)
• Goods, intellectual property rights (licences, patents etc.), loans/credits, etc. sold/bought/granted below/over appropriate value
• Estimated $100-160 million loss per year for developing countries
Deflated/inflated price extreme example: a
plastic bucket from USA to Pakistan for $972
11 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
Parent Parent company company
Subsidiary Subsidiary companycompany
Country A: high tax → costshigh tax → costs
Country B: low tax → profitslow tax → profits
Source: eurodad Presentation (2011): Country-by-country reporting and tax avoidance; Photo: photosmith2011/Flickr
Example 1: Glencore – or: the ressource course?
12 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
Glencore International Glencore International AG (Zug, CH)AG (Zug, CH)
First Quantum First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (CA)Minerals Ltd. (CA)
Glencore Finance Glencore Finance (Bermuda)(Bermuda)
Skyblue enterprise inc. Skyblue enterprise inc. (Virgin Islands)(Virgin Islands)
Carlisa Investments Carlisa Investments (Virgin Islands)(Virgin Islands)
Mopani Copper MineMopani Copper Mine
ZCCM (Zambian state ZCCM (Zambian state owned company)owned company)
100% 100%
81,2% 18,8%
10%90%
Example 1: Glencore (2) – investigating TNCs
13 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
Independent Grant Thornton audit commissiond by Zambia found various tax evasion elements related to Mopani Copper Mines:
• Unreasonable high operating and labour costs: „At least USD 50 million of the USD 90 million is thus unexplainable.“
• Unreasonable low production: „it is not to be trusted that Mopani has an extraction %-age of cobalt that is half that of other producers.“
• Copper/cobald sold at deflated prices compared to London Metal Exchange prices (for MCM sales to Glencore International)
• Unreasonable use of derivatives: „The hedging pattern ... is more equal to moving taxable revenue out of the country than true hedging.“
ActionAid: Estimated tax loss of $175 million from 2003 to 2008
Shop-keeper Marta Shop-keeper Marta from Accra (Ghana): from Accra (Ghana):
££47 taxes (2009)47 taxes (2009)
Accra BreweryAccra Brewery(subsidiary of SAB Miller):(subsidiary of SAB Miller):
££0 taxes (2009)0 taxes (2009)
Source: Action Aid
Example 2: SAB Miller – or: Who pays taxes?
14 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
Example 2: SAB Miller – holding structure
15 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013Source: Martin Hearson, Action Aid (2011): Country-by-country reporting and tax avoidance: two case studies.
SAB Miller SAB Miller Management BV (NL)Management BV (NL)
National National Breweries (ZA)Breweries (ZA)
SAB Miller SAB Miller International VB (NL)International VB (NL)
Bevman AG Bevman AG (Switzerland)(Switzerland)
MUBEX MUBEX (Mauritius)(Mauritius)
Zambian Zambian Breweries Breweries
South African South African BreweriesBreweries
Accra Breweries Accra Breweries (Ghana)(Ghana)
Tanzanian Tanzanian Breweries Breweries
Cervejas de Cervejas de MocambiqueMocambique
Management fees
Royalties
Management fees
Procurement of goods
Source: Spiegel, 50/2012
Example 3: Ikea – or: what is a Swedish company?
16 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
Ingka Ingka Foundation (NL)Foundation (NL)
[Kamprad's sons] [Kamprad's sons] (Netherlands Antilles)(Netherlands Antilles)
Ingka Holding Ingka Holding Company (NL) Company (NL)
Ikea GroupIkea Group
Interogo Interogo Foundation (LI)Foundation (LI)
Ikano Holding Ikano Holding Company (LUX)Company (LUX)
Inter Ikea Holding Inter Ikea Holding Company (LUX) Company (LUX)
Stichting Ikea Stichting Ikea Foundation (NL)Foundation (NL)
Inter Ikea Inter Ikea Centre Group (DK)Centre Group (DK)
Inter Ikea Inter Ikea Systems (NL)Systems (NL)
brand
Inter Ikea Inter Ikea Finance (LUX)Finance (LUX)
Vastint Vastint Holding (NL)Holding (NL)
royalties
payments
Figures on TNC tax planning and evasion
17 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
• General: difficult to estimate due to- lack of transparency of TNC's operations, holdings etc.- line between legal and illegal practices hard to draw
• USA: - minimum of $37 billion annually by companies and banks (Source: Klinter, S. / Collins, C. / Sklar, H. (2010) Unfair Advantage: The Business Case Against Overseas Tax Havens)
- 2010: Apple 1% tax (foreign business), Google 3% (Source: FTD / M.A. Sullivan)
• UK: £840 million tax break annually(source: ActionAid (2011): Addicted to tax havens. The secret lifeof the FTSE 100)
• Germany: even worse than USA to estimate, some attempts:- Heckmeyer/Spengel: €60 bn. corporate tax base gap annualy(Source: Heckmeyer, J. / Spengel, C. (2008): Ausmaß der Gewinnverlagerung multinationaler Unternehmen – empirische Evidenz und Implikationen für die deutsche Steuerpolitik)
- Bach/Dwenger: €100 bn. corporate tax base gap annualy(Source: Bach, S. / Dwenger (2007): Unternehmensbesteuerung: Trotz hoher Steuersätze mäßiges Aufkommen)
Solutions (1): Arm's length principle (ALP)
18 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
• General:
- Treat each parent/subsidiary company as separate entity
- Require TNCs to price its internal operations equal to external operations. E.g. a good must be sold at the same price from one subsidiary to another as if it was sold to a customer. Various methods to calculate.
• ALP international standard, e.g. endorsed by OECD
• Germany: Foreign Tax Law („Außensteuergesetz“)
• Problem: Equal prices often hard to determine: even difficult for goods, very difficult if not even impossible for intellectual property rights (brands, patents etc.)
Solutions (2): Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs)
19 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
• General:
- Subsidiaries as separate entities, arm's length principle
- Mutual tax recognition to prevent double taxation, but EC now also looking at double non-taxation
• Model Agreements:
- OECD: separate entity and ALP approach
- UN: based on OECD model, adaption for developing countries
• Germany: Currently 111 DTAs; new one with Liechtenstein (LI) in 2012: patents only accepted if developed in LI; LI abolished its tax privilege for holding companies but still offers taxes of “down to” 10,6% for companies
Solutions (3): Non-Deductability and Source Taxation
20 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
• National rules to prevent mismatches, e.g. by restricting deductibility or by general anti-avoidance rules
• Proposal to amend EU directive on interest and royalty payments
Jarass/Obermair (for Germany):
• Taxing all operations at the source, not the profits (as even Unitary Taxation might be undermined by profit shifting)
• No deductibility of loans/credits (prevents profit shifting by artificial loans/credits)
• Restrict consolidation of entities („Steuerliche Organschaft“)
• Restrict loss deductibility
Source: Jarass, L. / Obermair, G.M. (2012): Steuermaßnahmen zur Nachhaltigen Staatsfinanzierung. http://www.jarass.com/Steuer/A/Steuerma%C3%9Fnahmen.pdf
Solutions (4): Country-by-country (CBC) reporting
21 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
• General: Reporting of corporate payments to governments and of corporate figures (assets, staff, sales etc.) that can serve as tax base
• International: Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI): 37 countries take part, 18 compliant
• USA: Dodd Frank Act (2010)
• EU: Ongoing revision of Accounting Directive
Further reading: Murphy, R. (2010): Country-by-Country Reporting. Shining Light into Financial Statements. Edited by TJN.
Solutions (4): Country-by-country reporting example
22 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
Mopani Copper Mine: Zambian EITI information on mines:
ZMK million Mineral Royalty
Corporate Tax
Other Total
Kashanshi 72.023 372.571 365.592 810.186
Konkola 58.226 883 246.713 315.822
Mopani 76.012 0 108.979 184.991
Year Mopani Staff
Costs (USD million) Numbers
2005 104 9.000
2007 209 9.000
Mopani Copper Mine: Information from Grant Thornton audit:
Solutions (5): Unitary Taxation: general principles
23 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
• Parent company with all its subsidiaries treated as one unit/entity
• Combined report for the corporation required, depicting its entire activity (similar to CBC reporting)
• Profit of the entire corporation is distributed to countries according to an apportionment formula which relies on features that cannot be shifted just on paper, e.g. assets, wages, sales
• Application possible unilaterally even though better multilaterally
Further reading: Piciotto, S. (2012): Towards Unitary Taxation of Transnational Coporations. Edited by TJN.
Solutions (5): Unitary Taxation: examples
24 WEED, Tax Havens and Transnational Corporations, 9.1.2013
• USA:
- Some US states (California e.a.) have applied for decades, formula one third each feature (assests, wages, sales)
- Federal rules have adopted elements of unitary taxation: “Controlled Foreign Company” Rule and “Profit Split“ rule
• EU:
- plans for Common Consolidated Corporote Tax Base (CCCTB)
- Proposal by European Commission, March 2011 (formula one third each), EP position in April 2012 (different formula), Member States still not agreed, probably coalition of the willing
- Main problems: voluntary application, only EU member states
Weltwirtschaft, Ökologie & EntwicklungWorld Economy, Ecology & Development
www.weed-online.org
Thank you for your attention!
Netzwerk Steuergerechtigkeit /Tax Justice Network
www.taxjustice.nethttp://steuergerechtigkeit.blogspot.de