TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement...

35
TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis Warren Prokopiw Pharmacy Resident 2011-2012

Transcript of TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement...

Page 1: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis

Warren Prokopiw

Pharmacy Resident 2011-2012

Page 2: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Case – Mr MW

• 76 yo

• Admitted 14 May for worsening CHF

• PMH: Aortic Stenosis, CVD (CABG x4 1980, PCI x3 stent 2008) AFib, CHF, Sinus bradycardia with pacemaker, COPD, DM, restless leg syndrome

• Echo: - jet velocity 3.45 m/s, EF 45% – mean gradient 26.4 mmHg

– aortic valve area 0.98 cm2

Page 3: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Aortic Stenosis

• Abnormal narrowing of aortic valve

• Caused by calcification

– Bases to leaflets

– Similar process to atherosclerosis

• Lipid accumulation

• Inflammation

• Calcification

Page 4: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Pathophysiology

• Obstruction develops over decades

• Pressure causes LV hypertrophy

– Decreased ejection fraction

– Insufficient coronary blood flow

– Resulting ischemia - further dysfunction

– Increased sensitivity to injury - RR = 50%

• Larger infarct

• Increased mortality

Page 5: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Natural history

• Affects 25% or adults over 65

• Risk factors – age, sex, hypertension, smoking,

hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus

• Prolonged latent period – Wide variability in progression

• Symptoms - angina, syncope, or heart failure – Average survival 2-3 years

– Sudden cardiac death

Page 6: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Diagnosis

• Systolic murmur

• Echocardiogram

– Valve anatomy

– LV response – size and function

• Doppler Echo

– Jet velocity

Page 7: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Staging

Indicator Mild Moderate Severe

Jet velocity (m per second)

Less than 3.0 3.0–4.0 Greater than 4.0

Mean gradient (mm Hg)*

Less than 25 25–40 Greater than 40

Valve area (cm2) Greater than 1.5 1.0–1.5 Less than 1.0

• a disease continuum • no single value that defines severity

Page 8: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Management

• Medical

– Anti-hypertensives

– Lipid lowering - no impact

– Prophylactic antibiotics for infective endocarditis no longer recommended

• Surgical

– Valve replacement required once symptomatic

Page 9: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Management

Page 10: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Mechanical Valve Replacement

• Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient

• Single tilting disk – severe compromise if thrombosis

• Bileaflet – quiet, stable, efficient

– Most common today

• Require warfarin

Page 11: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Bioprostheic Valves

• Tissue types

– porcine aortic or bovine pericardial

• Bovine better hemodynamic performance

• Stented or not

– Attempts for better efficiency - not observed

– stented more common

• No warfarin

Page 12: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Comparison

• Mechanical valve more durable – Tissue valves deteriorate by 10-15 years

• Higher in younger patients

• Mechanical valve higher bleeding risk

• Recommendations – Mechanical if have other mechanical valve or

< 65 yo and can take warfarin

– Tissue if warfarin is contraindicated or >65 without other risk factors for thrombolembolism

Page 13: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Aortic Balloon Valvotomy

• Palliative option for inoperable patients

• Percutaneous approach to decrease severity

– Fractures calcific deposits in leaflets

• early improvement

• Restenosis and deterioration in 6-12 months

Page 14: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Insertion (TAVI)

Page 15: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

TAVI

• percutaneously delivered aortic heart valve

• trileaflet bovine pericardial tissue

• tubular slotted stent

• SAPIEN

Page 16: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Valve Placement

Page 17: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Partner Study

• prospective, un-blinded, multicentre RCT

• Two distinct arms

– High risk operable n=699

– Inoperable n=358

• Inoperable

– 50% predicted probability of mortality or serious irreversible complication by 30 days by 1 cardiologist and 2 cardiothoracic surgeons

Page 18: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Trial Flow

Page 19: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

High Risk outcomes

Page 20: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Inoperable Outcomes

Overall, the benefit from TAVR in inoperable patients with symptomatic severe AS greatly exceeds the risk

Page 21: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Two year Results

• N Engl J Med 2012;366:1696-704

Page 22: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Rate of death from any cause

Page 23: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Rate of death cardiac causes

Page 24: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Rate of rehospitalization

Page 25: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Rate of death or stroke

Page 26: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Stroke

• Disturbing complication

– Higher in TAVI group

• 1 year (11.2% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.06)

• 2 years (13.8 vs. 5.5%, P = 0.01)

• 66% occurring in first 30 days

• Causes

– Thromboembolism at valve site

– Artherothromobic emboli from plaques in aortic arch dislodged during catheter manipulation

Page 27: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Antithrombotic Therapy

Valve Replacement

Page 28: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

POD 1-5 Bridging

• Bioprothetic valves – No studies – no recommendations

• Mechanical valves – Evidence summary at 30 d – bridge to warfarin

– Use prophylactic UFH or LMWH (therapeutic or prophylactic) until INR stable

Tromboembolism % Bleed %

Prophylactic UFH 0.9 3.3

Therapeutic LMWH 0.6 4.8

Therapeutic UFH 1.1 7.2

Page 29: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Bioprosthetic Valves

• High clot risk first 3 months

– Varies by location

• Aortic - ASA over warfarin if in NSR

– increased risk of bleed with warfarin over ASA, no difference in events

• Mitral – warfarin INR 2.0 - 3.0

– risk of stroke up to 40 events per 100 patient years

– Warfarin lowered risk, higher INRs increased bleed

Page 30: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Bioprosthetic Valves

• Thromboembolism risk beyond three months

– Mitral position – 0.2 to 2.6% per year

– Aortic position – 0.2% per year

• If in NSR – ASA indefinitely

Page 31: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Mechanical Valves

• Warfarin to no anti-coagulation – 0.21 (CI ,0.16-0.27) RR of thromboembolism

– 0.11 (95% CI,0.07-0.2) RR of valve thrombosis

• Aortic – INR 2.0-3.0

• Mitral – INR 2.5-3.5 – More thrombogenic due to different

hemocynamic and flow over the valve

• Dual valves – Treat as per mitral

Page 32: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Mechanical Valves

• New meta analysis for addition of ASA to warfarin

– reduction in mortality

• (RR, 0.58;95% CI, 0.4-0.86)

– thromboembolic outcome

• (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.81)

– increase in risk of major hemorrhage

• (RR 1.44; 95% CI, 1.00-2.08)

• Add ASA 50-100 mg to warfarin for patients with no risk of bleeding

Page 33: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Trascahterter Aortic Valves

• Bioprosthetic valve

• Non-drug eluting stent

• Clopidogel plus ASA x 3 months

– No studies for anti-thrombotic

– Extension of practice in coronary stenting

Page 34: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

Questions?

Page 35: TAVI and Valve Replacement Thromboprophylaxis · 2012. 5. 22. · Mechanical Valve Replacement •Ball and cage – noisy and inefficient •Single tilting disk – severe compromise

References 1. Holmes DR, Mack MJ, Kaul S, Agnihotri A, Alexander KP, Bailey SR, et al. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS

Expert Consensus Document on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Journal of the American College of Cardiology [Internet]. 2012 Jan 30 [cited 2012 Mar 14];59(13):1200–54. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22300974

2. Bonow RO, Carabello B a, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology [Internet]. 2006 Aug 1 [cited 2012 Mar 10];48(3):e1–148. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16875962

3. Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Jilaihawi H, Kapadia S, Pichard AD, Douglas PS, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. The New England journal of medicine [Internet]. 2012 May 3;366(18):1696–704. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22443478

4. Whitlock RP, Sun JC, Fremes SE, Rubens FD, Teoh KH. Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Valvular Disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest [Internet]. 2012 Feb [cited 2012 Mar 3];141(2 Suppl):e576S–600S. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22315272

5. Wilson W, Taubert K a, Gewitz M, Lockhart PB, Baddour LM, Levison M, et al. Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation [Internet]. 2007 Oct 9 [cited 2012 Mar 10];116(15):1736–54. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17446442