Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV...

31
tits' IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR T FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOI S EASTERN DIVISIO N GEORGE TATZ, individually and on behal f of all others similarly situated , Plaintiff , vs . NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIE S CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JES S JANKOWSKI, DANIEL S . BILICKI, an d GINA KRITCHEVSKY , Defendants . ea r l 0 i 200 3 LZ D JUL 2 8 2003 MART/Al C. N UNITED STAr S MAGlSTp A ITED 01 A7 E S DISr 1c JUDG E RrCT CpURT Civil Action No . 01 C 844 0 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMEN T Magistrate Judge Martin C . Ashman 3 6

Transcript of Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV...

Page 1: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

tits'

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOI S

EASTERN DIVISION

GEORGE TATZ, individually and on behal f

of all others similarly situated ,

Plaintiff,

vs .

NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIE S

CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JES S

JANKOWSKI, DANIEL S . BILICKI, and

GINA KRITCHEVSKY,

Defendants .

ea r

l 0 i 2003LZ D

JUL 2 8 2003MART/Al C.

NUNITED STAr S MAGlSTpAITED

01A7

ES DISr 1c JUDGERrCT CpURT

Civil Action No. 01 C 8440

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

Magistrate Judge Martin C . Ashman

36

Page 2: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

This Stipulation of Settlement dated as of July 25, 2003 (the "Stipulation"), is made and

entered into by and among : (i) Lead Plaintiff George Tatz ("Lead Plaintiff'), (ii) the Class (as

defined herein)(the "Class" and "Lead Plaintiff' are collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs" unless

otherwise noted), and (iii) defendants Nanophase Technologies Corporation ("Nanophase" or the

"Company"), and Joseph Cross ("Cross"), Jess Jankowski ("Jankowski"), Daniel S . Bilicki

("Bilicki"), and Gina K itchevsky ("Kritchevsky"), Company officers and directors during the

Class Period (as herein defined) (the "Individual Defendants" and, collectively with the

Company, "Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record in the Litigation. All Parties to

this Stipulation, including all Plaintiffs and Defendants, shall collectively be referred to as the

"Parties" or the "Settling Parties ." The Stipulation is intended by the Settling Parties to fully,

finally and forever resolve, discharge and settle the Released Claims and Released Defendants'

Claims (as defined herein), upon and subject to the terms and conditions hereof, and subject to

the approval of the Court .

1 . . THE LITIGATION

A. Commencement of the Action and Preliminary Motion s

On November 2, 2001 , a putative federal securities class action was filed in the United

States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on behalf of a class of

persons who purchased the stock of Nanophase between April 5, 2001 and October 24, 2001 (the

"Class Period") and were allegedly injured thereby. Following publication in accordance with

the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA"), on February 5, 2002, motions

for the appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel came on for hearing and were

taken under advisement . Thereafter, pursuant to §21D(a)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act

of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), (as amended by the PSLRA), the Court appointed George Tatz as

Lead Plaintiff. Pursuant to §21(D)(a)(3)(B)(v) of the Exchange Act (as amended by the PSLRA),

the Court also appointed Glancy & Binkow LLP as Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel and Pomerantz

Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP as Liaison Counsel.

B . The Claims Asserted By Plaintiffs

-1-

Page 3: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

On March 8 , 2002, Lead Plaintiff, on behalf of those persons who purchased the common

stock of Nanophase during the Class Period, filed an Amended Class Action Complaint

("ACAC"), naming as defendants Nanophase , Cross, Jankowski , Bilicki and Kritchevsky, and

seeking relief for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act . The ACAC

alleged , inter alia, that just prior to the Class Period , Defendants had allegedly improperly

announced a sale in first quarter 2001 to an unnamed customer and, during the Class Period, had

allegedly prematurely recorded revenue on the sale in alleged violation of both Generally

Accepted Accounting Principles and the Company 's published revenue recognition policy . The

Class Period closed when Defendants announced they had reversed the transaction . Plaintiffs

allege that they were injured by their purchase of Nanophase shares during the Class Period at

prices which were alleged to be art ificially inflated not only by the alleged improperly recorded

sale, but by Defendants' announcement that the sale represented the first order of a longer-term

relationship with the unnamed customer .

C. Conduct Of The Litigation Prior To Settlemen t

On April 12, 2002, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the ACAC for failure to state a

claim, asserting that the ACAC failed to meet the pleading requirements of Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6) and of the PSLRA . On May 10, 2002, Plaintiffs opposed

Defendants' motion. Defendants filed reply papers in support of their motion on May 31, 2002 .

By Memorandum Opinion and Order dated October 9, 2002, the Court denied Defendants'

motion .

In the following weeks and months the matter was extremely active . Specifically :

1 . On October 16, 2002, the Court granted Defendants' motion to enlarge their time

to file an answer to the ACAC, granting Defendants leave to file their answer by

November 12, 2002 ;

2. On October 17, 2002, Defendants made an Offer of Judgment in an amount

deemed sufficient to satisfy Mr . Tatz's individual damages claim;

-2-

Page 4: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

3. On October 22, 2002, the Court ordered that Plaintiff' s motion for class

certification be fled no later than one month after Defendants' answer;

4. On November 12, 2002, Defendants filed their Answer to the ACAC, denying all

wrongdoing and liability as to both causes of action and assert ing a number of

affirmative defenses .

5. On December 12, 2002, Lead Plaintiffs motion for class cert ification was timely

filed ;

6. During the month after Lead Plaintiff's class ce rti fication motion was filed, the

Parties engaged in extensive discovery, to wit : Mr. Tatz, the proposed class

representative, produced documents and interrogatory responses and sat for a

deposition. While class discovery was proceeding, Plaintiffs began merits

discovery, serving an extensive set of document production requests on

Defendants and reviewing thousands of pages produced in response ;

7 . Defendants moved for, and were granted, on February 11, 2003, the issuance of a

Letter of Request to conduct discovery in Great Britain pursuant to the Hague

Convention ;

8. On February 12, 2003, Defendants' filed their papers in opposition to class

certification ;

9. On March 11, 2003, after receiving an enlargement of time, Plaintiffs filed their

reply papers in support of their motion for class certification ;

10. On March 19, 2003, Defendants filed a motion to strike a declaration filed in

support of Plaintiffs' class certification motion ;

11 . On March 25, 2003, Plaintiffs' motion for class certification and Defendants '

motion to strike came on for hearing before the Honorable Wayne R . Andersen .

The Court referred Defendants' motion to the Honorable Martin C . Ashman,

Magistrate Judge, and took Plaintiffs' motion for class certification under

advisement .

-3-

Page 5: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

12 . Following the March 25, 2003 class certification hearing, the Parties initiated

settlement discussions .

13 . On April 2, 2003, the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Ashman for the

purpose of conducting settlement negotiations with the Parties .

14 . On April 17, 2003, Magistrate Judge Ashman issued an Order requiring the

Parties to exchange settlement position papers in advance of a Settlement

Conference to be held on June 11, 2003 .

15 . On June 11, 2003, with the assistance of Magistrate Judge Ashman, the Parties

were able to reach an agreement in principle to settle the Litigation for the sum of

$2,500,000.

16 . On June 12, 2003, Lead Plaintiffs motion for class certification pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) was granted by the Court .

The Parties have agreed to file this Stipulation of Settlement and all other necessary

related documents to obtain preliminary and final approval of the Settlement .

D. Defendants ' Denials Of Wrongdoing And Liability

Defendants expressly deny each and all of the claims and contentions specifically allege d

by the Plaintiffs in the litigation, and raise a number of affirmative defenses to Plaintiffs' claims

in their Answer. Defendants contend, inter alia, that neither Lead Plaintiff nor the Class has

suffered any alleged damage, and that the price of Nanophase common stock was never

artificially inflated during the Class Period by reason of alleged material misrepresentations, non-

disclosures or otherwise . Defendants also contend that, in any case, their conduct was at all

times in good faith and at no time did any of them intentionally or recklessly make

misrepresentations or omissions of material fact. Further, Defendants generally deny all charges

of wrongdoing or liability against them arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts or

omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Litigation .

Nonetheless, Defendants concluded that further conduct of the Litigation would be

distracting, protracted, and expensive, and that it is desirable that the Litigation be fully an d

-4-

Page 6: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

finally settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation.

Defendants have taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially

in complex cases like this Litigation . Defendants have, therefore, determined that it is desirable

and beneficial to them that the Litigation be settled in the manner and upon the terms and

conditions set forth in this Stipulation .

In no event shall this Stipulation, or its related documents, be construed as or deemed to

be evidence of or an admission or concession on the part of any Defendant, or any of Defendants'

Corresponding Released Parties (defined below), with respect to any claim or any fault or

liability or wrongdoing or damage whatsoever. Defendants, and each of them, shall not assert or

pursue any action, claim or rights that any other Party hereto or their Related Parties (defined

below) violated any provision of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure . Further,

Defendants, and each of them, will not deny in any statement made to any media representative

that the Litigation is being settled voluntarily after consultation with competent counsel .

Defendants and their Counsel agree that the Litigation was resolved in good faith, following

arms' length bargaining, confers substantial benefits upon the Class and, based upon their

evaluation, is in the best interests of the Defendants as well as Lead Plaintiff and the Class .

E. Lead Plaintiff's Evaluation Of the Class 's Claims And The Benefits OfSettlement

Lead Plaintiff believes that the claims asserted in the Litigation have merit and that th e

evidence developed to date , including a review of thousands of documents, supports the claims

alleged in the ACAC . Additionally, Plaintiffs ' Lead Counsel in the Litigation have researched

the applicable law with respect to Plaintiffs ' claims and believe they could successfully refute

any defenses raised by Defendants . However, both Lead Plaintiff and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel

recognize and acknowledge the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to

prosecute the Litigation against the Defendants through t rial and any subsequent appeals

including , but not limited to, the need for the Parties to conduct costly discovery in Great Britain.

Lead Plaintiff and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel have also taken into account the unce rtain outcome

and the risk of any litigation , especially in complex actions such as this Litigation , as we ll as the

-5-

Page 7: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation . Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel are particularly

mindful of the inherent problems of proof of both damages and Defendants' state of mind, two of

the elements required to establish the underlying federal securities law violations asserted in the

Litigation .

This Stipulation shall in no event be construed or deemed to be evidence of a concession

by Plaintiffs of any infirmity in the claims asserted in the Litigation . Plaintiffs , and each of them,

shall not asse rt or pursue in any action , claim or rights that any other Party hereto or their Related

Part ies (defined below ) violated any provision of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civi l

Procedure . Further, Lead Plaintiff and Plaintiffs ' Lead Counsel, and each of them , will not deny

in any statement made to any media representative that the Litigation is being settled voluntarily

after consultation with competent counsel . Lead Plaintiff and Plaintiffs ' Lead Counsel agree that

the Litigation was resolved in good faith, following arms ' length bargaining . Lead Plaintiff and

Plaintiffs ' Lead Counsel believe that the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation confers

substantial bene fits upon the Class and , based on their evaluation , that the Settlement set forth in

the Stipulation is fair, reasonable and adequate , and thus in the best interests of the Lead Plaintiff

and the Class .

it . TERMS OF STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMEN T

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among

Lead Plaintiff and the Class, and each of them, and Defendants, and each of them, by and through

their respective undersigned counsel that, subject to approval of the Court pursuant to Rule 23(e)

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in consideration of the benefits flowing to the Settling

Parties from the Settlement set forth herein, that the Litigation, the Released Claims and the

Released Defendants' Claims shall be finally and fully compromised, settled and released, and

the Litigation shall be dismissed with prejudice, as to all Parties, upon and subject to the terms

and conditions of this Stipulation .

1 . Definitions

As used in the Stipulation the following terms have the meanings specified below .

-6-

Page 8: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

1 .1 "Authorized Claimant" means any Class Member whose claim for recovery has

been allowed pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation .

1 .2 "Claimant" means any Class Member who files a Proof of Claim in such form and

manner, and within such time, as the Court shall prescribe .

1 .3 "Claims Administrator" means the firm of The Garden City Group, Inc .

1 .4 "Class" means the class certified by the Court on June 12, 2003, to wit : "Al l

Persons or entities who purchased or acquired Nanophase Technologies Corporation

("Nanophase" or "Corporation") common stock during period from April 5, 2001, through and

including October 24, 2001 (the "Class Period"), and were damaged thereby. Excluded from the

class are the defendants, their affiliates and any officers or directors of Nanophase or its affiliates,

and any members of immediate families and their heirs, successors and assigns (the "Class") . "

1 .5 "Class Member" or "Member of the Class" means a Person who falls within the

definition of the Class, as set forth in ¶1 .4 above, and who has not filed a valid request to be

excluded from the Class .

1 .6 "Court" means the United States District Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division .

1 .7 "Defendants" mean Nanophase Technologies Corporation, Joseph Cross, Jess

Jankowski, Daniel S . Bilicki and Gina Kritchevsky.

1 .8 "Defendants' Counsel" means the law firm of Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon .

1 .9 "Effective Date" means the first date by which all of the events and conditions

specified in ¶7 .1 of the Stipulation have been met and have occurred .

1 .10 "Escrow Agent" means The Garden City Group, Inc .

1 .11 "Final" means : (i) The date of final affirmance on any appeal of the Judgment, the

expiration of the time for a petition for or a denial of any writ of certiorari to review any appellate

determination of the Judgment and, if certiorari is granted, the date of final affirmance of the

Judgment following review pursuant to that grant ; or (ii) the date of final dismissal of any appeal

from the Judgment or the final dismissal of any proceeding on certiorari to review any appellat e

-7-

Page 9: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

determination of the Judgment ; or (iii) if no appeal is filed, the expiration date of the time for the

filing or noticing of any appeal from the Court's Judgment approving the Stipulation substantially

in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto ; i .e ., thirty (30) days after entry of the Judgment . Any

proceeding or order, or any appeal or petition for a writ of certiorari pertaining solely to any plan

of allocation and/or application for attorneys' fees, costs or expenses and/or application for a

class representative award, shall not in any way delay or preclude the Judgment from becoming

Final .

1 .12 "Judgment" means the final judgment and order of dismissal with prejudice to be

rendered by the Court, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B .

1 .13 "Lead Plaintiff' means George Tatz .

1 .14 "Notice" means the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

and Settlement Hearing Thereon, which is to be sent to members of the Class substantially in the

form attached hereto as Exhibit A-1 .

1 .15 "Notice Order" or "Order for Notice and Hearing" means the proposed order

preliminarily approving the Settlement and directing notice thereof to the Class substantially in

the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

1 .16 " Parties" or " Settling Parties" means Lead Plaintiff, the Class and the

Defendants .

1 .17 "Person" means an individual, corporation, partnership, limited partnership,

association, joint stock company, estate, legal representative, trust, unincorporated association,

government or any political subdivision or agency thereof, and any business or legal entity and

their spouses, heirs, predecessors, successors, representatives, or assignees .

1 .18 "Plaintiffs' Counsel" means counsel who have appeared for the plaintiffs in the

Litigation .

1 .19 "Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel" or " Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel" means Glancy &

Binkow LLP, 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311, Los Angeles, California 90067, Telephone

(310) 201-9150 .

-8-

Page 10: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

1 .20 "Plan of Allocation" means a plan or formula of allocation of the Settlement Fund

whereby the Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants after payment of

expenses of notice and administration of the Settlement, Taxes and Tax Expenses and such

attorneys' fees, costs, expenses and interest as may be awarded by the Court . Any Plan of

Allocation is not part of the Stipulation and Defendants and their Related Parties shall have no

responsibility or liability with respect thereto .

1 .21 "Proof of Claim" means the Proof of Claim and Release to be submitted by

Claimants, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A-2 .

1 .22 "Publication Notice" means the Summary Notice of Pendency and Proposed

Settlement of Action and Settlement Hearing Thereon to be published on the Business Wire,

substantially in the form of Exhibit A-3 .

1 .23 "Related Parties" means each of the Settling Parties and each of their past or

present directors, officers, employees, partners, members, principals, agents, insurers, co-

insurers, reinsurers, controlling shareholders, attorneys, associates, personal or legal

representatives, predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, joint ventures, assigns,

spouses, heirs, related or affiliated entities, any entity in which a Settling Party has a controlling

interest, any members of their immediate families, or any trust of which any Settling Party is the

settlor or which is for the benefit of any Settling Party and/or member(s) of his family .

1 .24 "Released Claims" shall collectively mean all claims (including "Unknow n

Claims" as defined in ¶1 .34 below), demands, rights, liabilities and causes of action in law or in

equity, accrued or unaccrued, fixed or contingent, direct, individual or representative, of every

nature and description whatsoever, whether based on federal, state, local, statutory or common

law or any other law, rule or regulation, including the law of any jurisdiction outside the United

States, known or unknown, whether or not concealed or hidden, asserted in the Litigation or that

might have been asserted in the Litigation, including, without limitation, claims for negligence,

gross negligence, breach of duty of care and/or breach of duty of loyalty, fraud or breach of

fiduciary duty, by Lead Plaintiff or any Class Member, or any of their Related Parties, against th e

-9-

Page 11: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

Defendants or any of the Defendants' Related Parties, or any of them, arising out of, based upon

or related to both the purchase or acquisition of the shares of Nanophase by any Class Member

during the Class Period and the facts, transactions, events, occurrences, acts, disclosures ,

statements, omissions or failures to act which were or could have been alleged in the Litigation,

based upon the facts which were alleged .

1 .25 "Released Defendants' Claims" means all claims (including "Unknown Claims "

as defined in ¶1 .30 below), demands, rights, liabilities or causes of action, in law or in equity,

accrued or unaccrued, fixed or contingent, direct, individual or representative, of every nature

and description whatsoever, whether based on federal, state, local, statutory or common law or

any other law, rule or regulation, including the law of any jurisdiction outside the United States,

known or unknown, whether or not concealed or hidden, asserted in the Litigation or that might

have been asserted in the Litigation, against the Lead Plaintiff, the Class, and their Related

Parties, or any of them, arising out of, based upon or related to both the purchase and/or sale of

Nanophase common stock during the Class Period, and the facts, transactions, events, matters,

occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, misrepresentation, omissions or failures to act which

were or could have been asserted or alleged in the Litigation, belonging to Defendants and

Related Parties, or any of them, that relate in any way to the Litigation or its institution,

prosecution, or Settlement. However, Released Defendants' Claims do not include any claims

which have been brought or might be brought by any of the Defendants against Celox Ltd .,

Oxonica Ltd., Envirox Resources Ltd . or any of their Related Parties related to or arising out of

any transactions or agreements between or among Nanophase Technologies Corporation and

those persons and entities, whether such occurred prior to, during, or after the Class Period .

1 .26 "Released Parties" means Lead Plaintiff, the Class, Defendants, and each of thei r

Corresponding Released Parties . "Corresponding Released Parties" shall mean any and all of

these Defendants' or Plaintiffs' respective present or past heirs, executors, estates, administra-

tors, predecessors, successors, assigns, parents, subsidiaries, associates, affiliates, employers,

employees, agents, consultants, insurers, reinsurers, directors, managing directors, officers ,

-10-

Page 12: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

partners, principals, members, attorneys, shareholders, legal representatives, successors in

interest, assigns and Persons, firms, trusts, corporations, officers, directors, or other individuals

or entities in which any Defendant or Plaintiff has a controlling interest or which is related to or

affiliated with any of the Defendants or Plaintiffs and any other representatives of any of these

Persons or entities .

1 .27 "Settled Claims" means all of the Released Claims and Released Defendants'

Claims against the Released Parties and their Corresponding Released Parties .

1 .28 "Settlement Fund" means the principal amount of Two Million Five Hundred

Thousand Dollars ($2,500,000) paid pursuant to ¶2 .1 of the Stipulation and delivered to the

Escrow Agent, plus any interest accrued thereupon after payment .

1 .29 "Settling Parties" means, collectively, each of the Defendants and the Lead

Plaintiff on behalf of himself and the members of the Class .

1 .30 "Unknown Claims" means any Released Claims or Released Defendants' Claim s

which any Settling Party, and any or all other Persons and entities whose claims are being

released, does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the

Released Parties which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its Settlement

with and release of the Released Parties, or might have affected his, her or its decision not to

object to this Settlement. Upon the Effective Date, the Settling Parties, and all other Persons and

entities whose claims are being released, shall be deemed to have, and shall have, expressly

waived and relinquished, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the provisions, rights and benefits

of §1542 of the California Civil Code, which provides as follows :A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know orsuspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if knownby him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor .

Lead Plaintiff and Defendants have, and each of the Class Members shall be deemed to

have and - by operation of the Judgment - shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions,

rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle

of common law, which is similar, comparable and equivalent to California Civil Code §1542 .

The Settling Parties may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which he ,

-11-

Page 13: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

she or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released

Claims and/or the Released Defendants' Claims, but Lead Plaintiff and each Defendant shall

expressly and each Class Member, upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and - by

operation of the Judgment - shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all

Released Claims and Released Defendants' Claims, known or unknown, suspected or

unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist,

or heretofore have existed upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into

existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct which is negligent, intentional, with

or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent

discovery or existence of such different or additional facts . Lead Plaintiff and Defendants

acknowledge, and the Class Members shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have

acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver of Unknown Claims was separately bargained for and a

key element of the Settlement of which this release is a part .

2 . The Settlement

a . The Settlement Fund

2.1 The sum of $2,500,000 in cash (the "Cash Settlement Amount"), will be

transferred to the Escrow Agent no later than thirty (30) calendar days following entry of the

Preliminary Approval Order by the Court . The Cash Settlement Amount will be deposited into a

third-party interest-bearing account, to be held on behalf of the Class, pending disbursement, in

the name of the "Nanophase Securities Litigation Settlement Fund" at an institution designated

by the Escrow Agent (the "Escrow Account") . The Cash Settlement Amount and any interest

earned thereon after transfer of the amount to the Escrow Agent shall be the "Settlement Fund ."

b. Handling and Disbursement of Funds by the Escrow Agent

2.2 No monies will be disbursed from the Settlement Fund until after the Effective

Date except :

(a) As provided in ¶2 .7 below, consistent with prior order of the Court ; and

-12-

Page 14: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

(b) To pay Taxes and Tax Expenses (as defined in ¶2 .8 below) on the income

earned by the Nanophase Securities Litigation Settlement Fund . Taxes and Tax Expenses shal l

be paid out of the Settlement Fund, shall be considered to be a cost of administration of the

Settlement and shall be timely paid by the Escrow Agent without prior Order of Court .

2.3 The Escrow Agent shall invest the Settlement Fund deposited pursuant to ¶2 . 1

above, in excess of $100,000, in instruments backed by the full faith and credit of the United

States Government or fully insured by the United States Government or an agency thereof and

shall reinvest the proceeds of these instruments as they mature in similar instruments at their

then-current market rates . Any funds held in escrow in an amount of less than $100,000 maybe

held in an interest-bearing account insured by the FDIC . The Escrow Agent shall bear all risks

related to investment of the Settlement Fund .

2.4 The Escrow Agent shall not disburse the Settlement Fund except as provided in

the Stipulation, by an order of the Court, or with the written agreement of counsel for Defendants

and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel .

2.5 Subject to further orders and/or directions as may be made by the Court, the

Escrow Agent is authorized to execute such transactions on behalf of the Class Members as are

consistent with the terms of the Stipulation .

2 .6 All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered to be in

custodia le&is of the Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court, until such

time as such funds shall be distributed pursuant to the Stipulation and/or further order(s) of the

Court .

2 .7 After transfer of the Settlement Fund to the Escrow Agent pursuant to ¶2 .1 hereof,

the Escrow Agent may establish a "Class Notice and Administration Fund," and may deposit up

to $62,500 from the Settlement Fund in it . The Class Notice and Administration Fund may be

used by Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel to pay costs and expenses reasonably and actually incurred in

connection with providing notice to the Class, locating Class Members, soliciting Class claims,

assisting with the filing of claims, administering and distributing the Settlement Fund t o

-13-

Page 15: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

Authorized Claimants, processing Proof of Claim and Release forms and paying escrow fees and

costs, if any. The Class Notice and Administration Fund may also be invested and earn interest

as provided for in ¶2.3 of this Stipulation .

c . Taxes

2.8 Settling Parties and the Escrow Agent agree to treat the Settlement Fund as being

at all times a "qualified settlement fund" within the meaning of Treas . Reg. Sec . 1 .468B-1 . In

addition, the Escrow Agent shall timely make such elections as necessary or advisable to carry

out the provisions of this ¶2 .8, including the "relation-back election" (as defined in Treas . Reg.

See . 1 .468B-1) back to the earliest permitted date . Such elections shall be made in compliance

with the procedures and requirements contained in such regulations . It shall be the responsibility

of the Escrow Agent to timely and properly prepare and deliver the necessary documentation for

signature by all necessary Parties, and thereafter to cause the appropriate filing to occur .

(a) For the purpose of §468B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as

amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, the "administrator" shall be the Escrow

Agent. The Escrow Agent shall timely and properly file all informational and other tax returns

necessary or advisable with respect to the Settlement Fund (including without limitation the

returns described in Treas . Reg. Sec. 1 .468B-2(k)) . Such returns (as well as the election

described in ¶2 .8(a) hereof) shall be consistent with this ¶2 .8 and in all events shall reflect that all

Taxes (including any estimated Taxes, interest or penalties) on the income earned by the cash

portion of the Settlement Fund shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund as provided in ¶2.8(c)

hereof.

(b) Defendants, their attorneys and insurers, and all their Related Parties shal l

have no liability or responsibility for any taxes (including any estimated Taxes, interest or

penalties) arising with respect to the income earned by the Settlement Fund, including any Taxes

or tax detriments that may be imposed upon the Defendants or their counsel with respect to any

income earned by the Settlement Fund for any period during which the Settlement Fund does not

qualify as a "qualified settlement fund" for federal or state income tax purposes ("Taxes") . Al l

-14-

Page 16: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

(a) Taxes and (b) expenses and costs incurred in connection with the operation and

implementation of this ¶2 .8 (including, without limitation, expenses of tax attorneys and/or

accountants and mailing and distribution costs and expenses relating to filing (or failing to file)

the returns described in this ¶2.8) ("Tax Expenses"), shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund ; in

all events the Defendants and their counsel and their Related Parties shall have no liability or

responsibility for the Taxes or the Tax Expenses . The Escrow Agent shall indemnify and hold

each of the Defendants and Defendants' Counsel, their Related Parties, and person(s) and/or

entities paying the Settlement Fund harmless for Taxes and Tax Expenses (including, without

limitation, Taxes payable by reason of any such indemnification) . Further, Taxes and Tax

Expenses shall be treated as, and considered to be, a cost of administration of the Settlement

Fund and shall be timely paid by the Escrow Agent out of the Settlement Fund without prior

order from the Court, and the Escrow Agent shall be obligated (notwithstanding anything herein

to the contrary) to withhold from distribution to Authorized Claimants any funds necessary to

pay such amounts including the establishment of adequate reserves for any Taxes and Tax

Expenses (as well as any amounts that may be required to be withheld under Treas . Reg. Sec .

1 .468B-2(l)(2)); neither the Defendants nor Defendants' Counsel nor their Related Parties are

responsible nor shall they have any liability therefor . The Parties hereto agree to cooperate with

the Escrow Agent, each other, and their tax attorneys and accountants to the extent reasonably

necessary to carry out the provisions of this ¶2 .8 .

(c} For the purpose of this ¶2 .8, references to the Settlement Fund shall

include both the Settlement Fund and the Class Notice and Administration Fund and shall also

include any earnings thereon .

d. Termination of Settlement

2 .9 Lead Plaintiff, on behalf of the Class, or Defendants, and any of them, shall have

the right to terminate the Settlement and this Stipulation by providing written notice of their

election to do so ("Termination Notice") to all other Parties hereto within thirty (30) days of (i)

the Court's declining to enter the Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Providing fo r

-15-

Page 17: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

Notice and Hearing in any material respect; (ii) the Court's refusal to approve this Stipulation or

any material part of it ; (iii) the Court's declining to enter the Final Order and Judgment in any

material respect; (iv) the date upon which the Final Order and Judgment is modified or reversed

in any material respect by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court ; or (v) the date upon which

an Alternative Judgment (defined in ¶7 .1(d) below) is modified or reversed in any material

respect by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.

2 .10 Additionally, each Defendant shall have the option to withdraw from this

Stipulation without prejudice on the terms and under the conditions set forth in the Supplemental

Stipulation to be filed under seal and referenced in $1 2 and 4 of the Preliminary Approval Order .

2.11 If a case is commenced in respect of any Defendant under Title 11 of the Unite d

States Code or a trustee, receiver or conservator is appointed under any similar law, and a court

of competent jurisdiction enters a final order determining the transfer of money to the Escrow

Account of any portion thereof on behalf of such Defendant to be a preference, voidable transfer,

fraudulent transfer or similar transaction and any portion thereof is thus required to be returned,

and such amount is not promptly deposited to Settlement Fund by other Defendants, then, at the

election of Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, the Settling Parties shall jointly move the Court to vacate

and set aside the releases given and Final Order and Judgment dismissing the Litigation entered

pursuant to this Stipulation and Settlement, which releases and Final Order and Judgment shall

be null and void, and the Parties shall be restored to their respective positions in the litigation as

of June 11, 2003, and any cash amounts in the Escrow Account shall be returned in the manner

set forth in ¶¶7 .4(b) and 7 .6 .

3 . Notice Order And Settlement Hearin

3 .1 Promptly after execution of the Stipulation, Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel shall submi t

the Stipulation together with its Exhibits to the Court and shall apply for entry of the Order

Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Providing for Notice and Hearing, substantially in the

form of Exhibit A attached hereto, requesting, inter alia, preliminary approval of the Settlement

set forth in the Stipulation, and approval for the mailing and publication of a settlement notic e

-16-

Page 18: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

(the "Notice"), substantially in the form of Exhibits A-1 and A-3 attached hereto, which shall

include the general terms of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation, the proposed Plan of

Allocation, the general terms of the Fee and Expense Application as defined in ¶6 .1 below and

the date of the Settlement Hearing as defined below.

3 .2 Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel shall request that, after notice is given, the Court hold a

hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") and approve settlement of the Litigation as set forth herein .

At or after the Settlement Hearing, Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel also will request that the Court

approve the proposed Plan of Allocation and the Fee and Expense Application .

4. Releases

4.1 The obligations incurred pursuant to this Stipulation shall be a full and final

disposition of the Litigation, any and all Released Claims and any and all Released Defendants'

Claims as against all Released Parties and their Corresponding Released Parties .

4.2 Upon the Effective Date, as defined in ¶1 .9 hereof, Lead Plaintiff and the Class ,

on behalf of themselves and their Corresponding Released Parties, shall be deemed to have, and

by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and

discharged all Released Claims against Defendants, and each of them, and any and all of their

Corresponding Released Parties, whether or not any individual Class Member executes and

delivers the Proof of Claim . Delivery of a Proof of Claim and Release executed by a Class

Member, which is substantially in the form contained in Exhibit A-2 attached hereto, shall

release all Released Claims against the Released Defendants and their Corresponding Released

Parties .

4 .3 Upon the Effective Date, as defined in ¶1 .9, Defendants, and each of them, on

behalf of themselves and their Corresponding Released Parties shall be deemed to have, and by

operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and

discharged all Released Defendants' Claims against Lead Plaintiff, all Class members, and any of

them, and any and all of those Parties' Corresponding Released Parties including, but not limited

to, Plaintiffs' Counsel .

-17-

Page 19: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

5 . Administration And Calculation Of Claims, Final Awards And SupervisionAnd Distribution Of Settlement Fund

5 .1 Under the supervision of Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, acting on behalf of the Class,

and subject to such supervision and direction of the Court as may be necessary or as

circumstances may require, the Claims Administrator shall administer and calculate the claims

submitted by Class Members and shall oversee distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (defined

below) to Authorized Claimants .

5 .2 The Settlement Fund shall be applied as follows :

(a) To pay the Taxes and Tax Expenses described in ¶2 .8 hereof;

(b) To pay all the costs and expenses reasonably and actually incurred in

connection with providing notice, locating Class Members, soliciting Class claims, assisting with

the filing of claims, administering and distributing the Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants,

processing Proof of Claim and Release forms and paying escrow fees and costs, if any;

(c) To pay Plaintiffs' Counsel's attorneys' fees, expenses and costs with

interest thereon (the "Fee and Expense Award"), if and to the extent allowed by the Court; and

(d) To distribute the balance of the Settlement Fund (the "Net Settlemen t

Fund") to Authorized Claimants as allowed by the Stipulation, the Plan of Allocation, or the

Court .

5 .3 Upon the Effective Date and thereafter, and in accordance with the terms of the

Stipulation, the Plan of Allocation, or such further approval and further order(s) of the Court as

may be necessary or as circumstances may require, the Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed

to Authorized Claimants, subject to and in accordance with the following :

(a) Any Person falling within the definition of the Class may be excluded

from the Class by submitting to the Claims Administrator a request for exclusion ("Request for

Exclusion"), which complies with the requirements set forth in ¶ 12 of the Preliminary Approval

Order, Exhibit A hereto, and is postmarked no later than October 29, 2003 . All Persons who

submit valid and timely Requests for Exclusion shall have no rights under Stipulation, shall not

share in distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the Stipulation or the

-18-

Page 20: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

Judgment. However, a Class member may submit a w ritten revocation of a Request for

Exclusion up until the Bar Date (defined below) and receive payments pursuant to this

Stipulation and Settlement provided the Class member also submits a valid Proof of Claim, as se t

forth in subparagraph 5 .3(b), below, prior to the Bar Date .

(b) Within 90 days of the mailing of the Notice (or the first business day

thereafter if the 90t" day falls on a weekend day or national holiday), or such other time as maybe

set by the Court, each Person claiming to be an Authorized Claimant shall be required to submit

to the Claims Administrator a completed Proof of Claim and Release, substantially in the form of

Exhibit A-2 attached hereto, signed under penalty of perjury and supported by such documents as

specified in the Proof of Claim and Release, or such other documents or proof, as are reasonably

available to the Authorized Claimant, as Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, in their discretion, may deem

acceptable .

(c) Except as otherwise ordered by the Court, all Class Members who fail t o

timely submit a Proof of Claim and Release by the Bar Date, or such other period as may be

ordered by the Court, or otherwise allowed, or who file a Proof of Claim that is rejected, shall be

forever barred from receiving any payments pursuant to this Stipulation and Settlement, but will

in all other respects be subject to and bound by the provisions of this Stipulation, the releases

contained herein, and the Judgment and will be barred and enjoined from bringing any action

against the Released Parties concerning the Settled Claims .

(d) Simultaneously herewith, Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel and Defendants '

Counsel are executing a "Supplemental Stipulation," to be filed under seal, setting forth certain

conditions under which this Stipulation may be withdrawn or terminated by any of the

Defendants if, prior to the Settlement Hearing, Persons beneficially owning an agreed upon

percentage of the total publicly-traded stock of Nanophase traded during the Class Period (who

otherwise would be Class Members) have submitted valid and timely Requests for Exclusion .

For the purposes of determining whether the conditions set forth in the Supplemental Stipulation

have occurred, copies of all Requests for Exclusion timely received, together with copies of all

-19-

Page 21: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

written revocations of Requests for Exclusion, shall be delivered to Defendants' counsel within

three (3) calendar days of receipt by Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel but in no event later than ten (10)

court days before the Settlement Hearing . In the event of a withdrawal from this Stipulation in

accordance with the terms of the Supplemental Stipulation, this Stipulation shall become null and

void and of no further force and effect and the provisions of 12.9 shall apply. Notwithstanding

the foregoing, the Stipulation shall not become null and void as a result of the election by any of

the Defendants to exercise their option to withdraw from the Stipulation pursuant to the

Supplemental Stipulation until the conditions set forth in the Supplemental Stipulation have been

satisfied .

5 .4 This is not a claims-made Settlement . Defendants may not recoup any portion o f

the Settlement Fund in the event the Court enters the Judgment approving the Settlement, except

as provided for in this Stipulation or the terms of the Supplemental Stipulation . The Net

Settlement Fund shall be distributed to the Authorized Claimants substantially in accordance

with a Plan of Allocation to be described in the Notice and approved by the Court . However, if

there is any balance remaining in the Net Settlement Fund after six (6) months from the date of

distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (whether by reason of tax refunds, uncashed checks or

otherwise), Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel shall reallocate such balance among Authorized Claimants

in an equitable and economic fashion. Thereafter, any balance which still remains in the Net

Settlement Fund shall be donated to an appropriate non-profit organization approved by the

Court .

5 .5 Defendants and their counsel and their Related Parties (except as provided in

¶¶2.8 and 7 .4) shall have no responsibility for, interest in, or liability whatsoever with respect to

the investment or distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, the Plan of Allocation, the

determination, administration, or calculation of claims, the payment or withholding of Taxes, or

any losses incurred in connection therewith . Defendants' Counsel shall cooperate in the

administration of the Settlement to the extent necessary to effectuate its terms .

-20-

Page 22: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

5 .6 No Person shall have any claim against Plaintiffs' Counsel, the Claims

Administrator, or any other agent appointed by Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, based on the

distributions made substantially in accordance with the Stipulation and the Settlement containe d

therein, the Plan of Allocation, or further orders of the Court .

5.7 It is understood and agreed by the Settling Parties that any proposed Plan o f

Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund including, but not limited to, any adjustments to an

Authorized Claimant's claim set forth therein, is not a part of the Stipulation and is to be

considered by the Court separately from the Court's consideration of the fairness, reasonableness

and adequacy of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and any orders or proceedings relating

to the Plan of Allocation shall not operate to terminate or cancel the Stipulation or affect the

finality of the Court's Judgment approving the Stipulation and the Settlement set forth therein, or

any other orders entered pursuant to the Stipulation .

6 . . Plaintiffs ' Counsel 's Attorneys' Fees And Reimbursement Of Expenses

6.1 Lead Plaintiff or Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel may submit an application o r

applications (the "Fee and Expense Application") for distributions to Plaintiffs' Counsel from the

Settlement Fund for : (a) an award of attorneys' fees not to exceed thirty percent (30%) of the

Cash Settlement Amount ; plus (b) reimbursement of actual expenses, including the fees and

expenses of any experts or consultants, incurred in connection with prosecuting the Litigation

(including costs of notice and Settlement administration), plus any interest accrued on such

attorneys' fees, costs and expenses while held in the Settlement Fund until disbursement at the

same rate as earned by the Settlement Fund as may be awarded by the Court . Plaintiffs' Lead

Counsel reserve the right to make additional applications for expenses incurred .

6 .2 The attorneys' fees, expenses and costs, including the fees and expenses of experts

and consultants, as awarded by the Court, shall be paid to Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel from the

Settlement Fund, as ordered, immediately after the Effective Date (as defined in this Stipulation) .

Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel shall thereafter allocate the attorneys' fees between Plaintiffs' Counsel i n

-21-

Page 23: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

a manner in which they in good faith believe reflects the contributions of such counsel to th e

prosecution and settlement of the Litigation .

6.3 Defendants and their Related Parties shall have no responsibility for, and n o

liability whatsoever with respect to, any payment to Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel or any other counse l

or Person who receives payment from the Settlement Fund.

6.4 Defendants and their Related Parties shall have no responsibility for, and no

liability whatsoever with respect to, the allocation among Plaintiffs' Counsel and/or any other

Person who may assert some claim thereto, of any Fee and Expense Award that the Court may

make in the Litigation .

7 . Conditions Of Settlement, Effect Of Disapproval, Cancellation O r

Termination

7.1 The Effective Date of the Stipulation shall be conditioned on the occurrence of al l

of the following events :

(a) Defendants have timely made their contributions to the Settlement Fund a s

required by ¶2 .1 hereof;

(b) The Court has entered the Notice Order, substantially in the form attached

hereto as Exhibit A ;

(c) The Court has approved the Settlement, following notice to the Class and a

hearing, as provided in Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Court ha s

entered the Judgment, or a judgment substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto ; and

(d) The Judgment has become Final , as defined in ¶1 .11 above , or, in the

event that the Court enters a judgment in form other than that provided above ("Alternative

Judgment") and which has the consent of the Parties, when such Alternative Judgment becomes

Final .

7 .2 Upon the occurrence of all of the events referenced in ¶7 .1 hereof, any and al l

remaining interest or right of Defendants in or to the Settlement Fund, if any, shall be absolutel y

and forever extinguished .

-22-

Page 24: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

7 .3 If some or all of the conditions specified in ¶7.1 are not met, or in the event that

this Stipulation is not approved by the Court, or the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation is

terminated or fails to become effective in accordance with its terms, then this Stipulation shall be

canceled and terminated subject to ¶7 .6 hereof unless Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel and counsel for

Defendants mutually agree in writing to proceed with the Stipulation . None of the Settling

Parties, or any of them, shall have any obligation whatsoever to proceed under any terms other

than provided for and agreed herein . If any Party engages in a material breach of the terms

hereof, any other Party, provided that it is in substantial compliance with the terms of this

Stipulation, may terminate this Stipulation on notice to all of the Settling . Parties .

7 .4 Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, if this Stipulation is terminated or fails to

become effective for the reasons set forth in ¶¶ 7 .1 and 7 .3, above, the Settling Parties shall be

restored to their respective positions in the Litigation as of June 11, 2003 . In such event :

(a) Any Judgment or other order entered by the Court in accordance with the

terms of this Stipulation shall be treated as vacated, nunc pro tune ;

(b) The Cash Settlement Amount , less any Taxes or Tax Expenses due with

respect to any interest earned by the fund and less expenses actually incurred and disbursed,

pursuant to ¶¶2.7 or 2.8 hereof, or due and owing in connection with notice costs and

administration of the Settlement provided for herein, shall be returned to Defendants by the

Escrow Agent within fifteen (15) business days after written notification of such event is sent by

counsel for Defendants . At the written request of Defendants' counsel, the Escrow Agent or its

designee shall apply for any tax refund owed to the Settlement Fund and pay the proceeds, after

deduction of any fees or expenses incurred in connection with such application(s) for refund, to

the Defendants .

7 .5 No order of the Court or modification or reversal on appeal of any order of the

Court concerning the Plan of Allocation or the amount of any attorneys' fees, expenses and

interest awarded by the Court to the Lead Plaintiff or to any Plaintiffs' Counsel shall constitute

grounds for cancellation or termination of the Stipulation, unless the Court otherwise orders .

-23-

Page 25: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

7.6 If the Effective Date does not occur, or if the Stipulation is terminated pursuant to

its terms, neither the Lead Plaintiff nor any of Plaintiffs' Counsel shall have any obligation to

repay any amounts actually and properly disbursed for the items set forth in ¶7 .4(b) for which

proof is shown that such amounts have already been properly incurred as expenses . In addition,

any expenses set forth in ¶7 .4(b) already incurred and chargeable at the time of such termination

or cancellation but which have not been paid, shall be paid by the Escrow Agent from the Gross

Settlement Fund in accordance with the terms of this Stipulation prior to the balance being

refunded in accordance with ¶7 .4(b) above.

8 . Miscellaneous Provisions

8 .1 The Settling Parties (a) acknowledge that it is their intent to consummate thi s

agreement; and (b) agree, subject to their fiduciary and other legal obligations, to cooperate to the

extent reasonably necessary to effectuate and implement all terms and conditions of this

Stipulation and to exercise their reasonable best efforts to accomplish the foregoing terms and

conditions of this Stipulation. Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel and Defendants' Counsel agree to

cooperate with one another in seeking Court approval of the Preliminary Approval Order, the

Stipulation, and the Settlement, and to promptly execute all such other agreed documentation as

may be reasonably required to obtain final approval of the Settlement .

8.2 Each Defendant warrants as to himself, herself or itself that, at the time thi s

Stipulation is executed by Defend ants ' counsel, he, she or it is not insolvent and the payment

provided under ¶ 2 .1 of the Stipulation will not render him, her or it insolvent within the meaning

of and/or for the purposes of the United States Bankruptcy Code, including , without limitation,

11 U.S.C. §§101 and 547 thereof. This warranty is made by the Defendants referenced in this

¶8.2 and not by Defendants ' Counsel .

8.3 The Parties intend this Stipulation to be a final and complete resolution of all

disputes between them with respect to the Litigation . The Settlement compromises claims which

are contested and shall not be deemed an admission by any Settling Party as to any fact alleged in

the ACAC or the merits of any claim or defense . While retaining their right to deny that th e

-24-

Page 26: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

claims advanced in the Litigation were meritorious, Defendants, in any statement made to any

media (whether or not for attribution), will not deny that the Litigation is being settled

voluntarily after consultation with competent legal counsel . The Final Judgment will contain a

statement that during the course of the Litigation, the Parties and their respective counsel at all

times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 . The Settling

Parties agree that the amount paid to the Settlement Fund and the other terms of the Settlement

were negotiated at arms' length and in good faith by the Settling Parties, and reflect a settlement

that was reached voluntarily after consultation with competent legal counsel . The Settling

Parties agree not to assert in any forum that the Litigation was brought by the Lead Plaintiff and

the Class, or each or any of them, or defended by any the Defendants, or each or any of them, in

bad faith. However, the Settling Parties, and each of them, reserve their right to rebut, in a

manner that such Party or Parties determine(s) to be appropriate, any contention made in any

public forum that the Litigation was brought or defended in bad faith or without a reasonable

basis .

8.4 Whether or not the Effective Date occurs or this Stipulation is terminated, neither

this Stipulation nor the Settlement contained herein, nor any act performed or document executed

pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the Settlement :

(a) Is, may be deemed, or shall be used, offered or received against

Defendants or Defendants' Corresponding Released Parties, or each or any of them, as an

admission, concession or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claims, the truth of any fact

alleged by Lead Plaintiff and the Class, or any of them, the deficiency of any defense that has

been or could have been asserted in the litigation, or of any alleged wrongdoing, liability,

negligence, fault of the Defendants and their Corresponding Released Parties, or any of them ;

(b) Is, may be deemed, or shall be used, offered or received against

Defendants, or each or any of them, as an admission, concession or evidence of, any fault,

misrepresentation or omission with respect to any statement or written document approved or

made by any Defendant and their Corresponding Released Parties, or any of them;

-25-

Page 27: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

(c) Is, may be deemed, or shall be used, offered or received against Lea d

Plaintiff and the Class, Plaintiffs' Corresponding Released Parties, or each or any of them, as an

admission, concession or evidence of, the validity of any of Released Defendants' Claims, the

infirmity of any claims raised in the Litigation, the truth of any fact alleged by Defendants, or the

availability of meritorious defenses to the claims raised in the Litigation ; and

(d) Is, may be deemed, or shall be used, offered or received against Lead

Plaintiff and the Class and Plaintiffs' Corresponding Released Parties, or each or any of them, or

against Defendants, Defendants' Corresponding Released Parties, or each or any of them, as an

admission or concession with respect to any liability, negligence, fault or wrongdoing as against

any Parties to the Stipulation, in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court,

administrative agency or other tribunal, other than in such proceedings as may be necessary to

effectuate the provisions of this Stipulation. However, if this Stipulation is approved by the

Court, any Party or any of the Corresponding Released Parties may file this Stipulation and/or the

Final Order and Judgment in any action that may be brought against such Party or Parties in order

to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res iudicata, collateral estoppel,

release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion

or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim;

(e) Is, may be deemed, or shall be construed against Lead Plaintiff and the

Class and Plaintiffs' Corresponding Released Parties, or each or any of them, or against

Defendants, Defendants' Corresponding Released Parties, or each or any of them, as an

admission or concession that the consideration to be given hereunder represents an amount equa l

to, less than or greater than that amount which could have or would have been recovered after

trial; and

(f) Is, may be deemed, or shall be construed as or received in evidence as a n

admission or concession against Lead Plaintiff and the Class and Plaintiffs' Corresponding

Released Parties, or each and any of them, that any of their claims are without merit or that

damages recoverable under the ACAC would not have exceeded the Cash Settlement Amount .

-26-

Page 28: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

8.5 The headings used herein are used for the purpose of convenience only and are not

meant to have legal effect.

8.6 The waiver by one Party of any breach of this Stipulation by any other Party shall

not be deemed as a waiver of any other prior or subsequent breaches of this Stipulation .

8 .7 All of the Exhibits to this Stipulation are material and integral parts hereof and are

fully incorporated herein by this reference .

8 .8 This Stipulation may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed

by or on behalf of all Settling Parties or their respective successors-in-interest .

8 .9 This Stipulation and the Exhibits attached thereto and the Supplementa l

Stipulation constitute the entire agreement among the Parties hereto and no representations,

warranties or inducements have been made to any Party concerning the Stipulation or its Exhibits

other than the representations, warranties and covenants contained and memorialized in such

documents . Except as otherwise provided therein, each Party shall bear its own costs .

8 .10 Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, on behalf of the Class, is expressly authorized by th e

Lead Plaintiff to take all appropriate action required or permitted to be taken by the Class

pursuant to the Stipulation to effectuate its terms and also are expressly authorized to enter into

any modifications or amendments to the Stipulation on behalf of the Class which they deem

appropriate .

8 .11 Each counsel or other Person executing the Stipulation or any of its Exhibits on

behalf of any Party hereto hereby warrants that such Person has the full authority to do so .

8 .12 This Stipulation may be executed in one or more counterparts . All executed

counterparts and each of them shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument . A complete

set of original executed counterparts shall be filed with the Court .

8 .13 This Stipulation shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors

and assigns of the Parties hereto and their Corresponding Released Parties .

-27-

Page 29: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

F

8.14 The Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to implementation an d

enforcement of the terms of the Stipulation, and all Parties hereto submit to the jurisdiction of the

Court for purposes of implementing and enforcing the Settlement embodied in the Stipulation .

8.15 This Stipulation and the Exhibits thereto shall be considered to have bee n

negotiated, executed and delivered, and to be wholly performed, in the State of Illinois, and the

rights and obligations of the Parties to the Stipulation shall be construed and enforced in

accordance with, and governed by, the internal, substantive laws of the State of Illinois without

giving effect to that State's choice of law principles .

8.16 This Stipulation is deemed to have been prepared by counsel for all Parties, as a

result of arms' length negotiations among the Parties . Whereas all Parties have contributed

substantially and materially to the preparation of this Stipulation, it shall not be construed more

strictly against one Party than another.

-28-

Page 30: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Stipulation to be executed ,

by their duly authorized attorneys, dated as of the dates indicated below .

DATED : GLANCY & BINKOW LLPLIONEL Z. GLANCYMICHAEL M . GOLDBERGROBIN B . HOWALDRICHARD M. ROTHENBERG

By :LIONEL Z . GLANCY

DATED:

1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311Los Angeles , CA 90067Telephone: (310) 201-9150Facsimile: (310) 201-9160

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXONDAVID L. WEINSTEINMICHAEL R. DOCKTE ANSAMU S. COHEN

By :DAVID L . WEINSTEIN

225 West Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606-1229Telephone: (312) 201-2000Facsimile: (312) 201-255 5

Counsel for Defendants

-29-

Page 31: Tatz, et al. v. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, et al. 01-CV …securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1021/NANX01-01/... · 2007-01-29 · CORPORATION, JOSEPH CROSS, JESS