Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan...

11
Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert Stemke and Emanuil Valmianski San Diego HAPL meeting August 8-9, 2006

Transcript of Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan...

Page 1: Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert.

Target Injection Update

Presented by Ron Petzoldt

Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert Stemke

and Emanuil Valmianski

San Diego HAPL meetingAugust 8-9, 2006

Page 2: Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert.

IFT\P2006-067

Overview of injection progress

In-flight target steering has been achievedCan improve overall target injection accuracy (goal ±1 mm to ease beam steering)

1.5 m target fall

Magnetic coils

accelerate target upward

Magnetic slingshot design calculations were done and support the concept’s feasibility

F = −∇ m⋅B( )

5

9

0Field contour

Page 3: Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert.

IFT\P2006-067

In-flight target steering achieved with dropped targets

±3 kV steeringelectrode

Mirror

Target release

Target charging

Camera

Laser

10 cm, 0.14 s

80 cm, 0.18 s

60 cm, 0.24 s

Key parametersTarget charge (~-0.1 nC), Target mass (300 mg), 4 mm diameterPeak velocity (5 m/s), Steering field range (±150 kV/m)Steering range (±2 mm)

Page 4: Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert.

IFT\P2006-067

We integrated in-flight steering with tracking system for real-time trajectory correction

Labview screen shot - details next slide…

Page 5: Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert.

IFT\P2006-067

We integrated in-flight steering with tracking system for real-time trajectory correction

Poisson spot

X vs time (mm)

Control signal Vi

Steering voltage based on X position (Poisson spot’s centroid) and velocity updates each ~10 ms

e.g.

Vi = −3000 X i + 30 X i − X i−1[ ]( )

Y

X

Steering voltage

Steering duration

X&Y positiontrace

-0.4 -

0.0 -

0.2 -

0.4 -

-0.2-

Page 6: Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert.

IFT\P2006-067

X position with various steering voltages

-1000

-800

-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Drop number

Final X position (µm)

Standard deviation of target placement accuracy (1D) decreased from 254 to 107 µm

Much of remaining error is believed due to “curve ball” effect

in air

-1500 V

0 VActive

Feedback

v

F

~0.1 mrad accuracy is similar to that needed for IFE

Additional goal is ±20 µm at 0.5 m for FTF

Page 7: Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert.

IFT\P2006-067

GA’s EMS Group calculations support Robson’s magnetic slingshot concept feasibility

Conductingtube

Shuttle

S/C Coil

Trigger coil

Conducting tube provides centering force but induces

drag on shuttle

Magnetic slingshot concept advantages• Non-contacting ferromagnetic shuttle

• No friction wear• Centering force provided by conducting enclosure• No sabot or gas turbulence• Potentially very accurate• No mechanical feedthroughs required into cryostat• Powered via simple DC magnetic field

Page 8: Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert.

IFT\P2006-067

Vector Fields* calculations show centering force in conducting tube leads to ~1 oscillation period

Shuttle length = 40 mmShuttle radius = 4 mmCarrier saturation = 2.4 TTube inner radius = 8 mm

Tune for integer number of half oscillation periods during acceleration 12 ms for minimum radial velocity

r0

r0

Case (a)

Case (b)

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

0 1 2 3

Radial Position (mm)

Restoring Force (N)

1 mm skin depth Superconductor

Bertie’s analytical estimate = 8.6 ms for same assumptions

*

4000 N/m => T = 12.5 ms

This shows centering force is adequate

Page 9: Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert.

IFT\P2006-067

r Hm-

m+a

a

Coil drag and power dissipated are significant but acceptable with sufficient tube conductivity

• Energy dissipated per target ~15 mJ in high conductivity case (0.075 W)• Acceleration force = 81 N >> drag force• 2.51011(Ωm)-1 corresponds to very high-purity cryogenic aluminum

0.01

0.1

1

10

0 50 100

Velocity (m/s)

Drag Force (N)

250 GS/m 2.86 GS/m2.86109(Ωm)-1

2.51011(Ωm)-1

1

10

100

0 50 100

Velocity (m/s)

Power Dissipated (W)

250 GS/m 2.86 GS/m2.86109(Ωm)-1

2.51011(Ωm)-1

Eddy currents in tube wallinduce drag = P/v

Page 10: Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert.

IFT\P2006-067

A 40 coil design results in a very smooth acceleration profile

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.3510

15

20

25

30

35

z [m]

dB/dz [T/m]

0 150 300 Z (mm)

10

20

30

dB/dz

(T/m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500

z [mm]

Field Bz along z-axis, r=0mm

250A 40

250A 20

200A 40

200A 20

0 200 400Z (mm)

0

5

10

Magnetic Field Bz

(T)

Acceleration

(G’s)

200

400

600

SC = Nb3Sn vf = 60 m/s

Page 11: Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert.

IFT\P2006-067

Summary of injection progressIn-flight target steering has been achieved•Real-time trajectory corrections based on position measurement

(v~5 m/s)

•1-D placement accuracy improved to 107 m (1 at 0.8 m standoff).

Calculations support the magnetic slingshot concept• Can achieve constant acceleration with a 40 coil design. • Adequate centering force is provided by a conducting tube.• Drag is acceptable with a sufficiently high-conductivity tube material (very high-purity aluminum).