Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan...
-
Upload
arnold-carroll -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Target Injection Update Presented by Ron Petzoldt Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan...
Target Injection Update
Presented by Ron Petzoldt
Neil Alexander, Landon Carlson, Lane Carlson, Dan Frey, Dan Goodin, Phan Huynh, Robert Kratz, Robert Stemke
and Emanuil Valmianski
San Diego HAPL meetingAugust 8-9, 2006
IFT\P2006-067
Overview of injection progress
In-flight target steering has been achievedCan improve overall target injection accuracy (goal ±1 mm to ease beam steering)
1.5 m target fall
Magnetic coils
accelerate target upward
Magnetic slingshot design calculations were done and support the concept’s feasibility
€
F = −∇ m⋅B( )
5
9
0Field contour
IFT\P2006-067
In-flight target steering achieved with dropped targets
±3 kV steeringelectrode
Mirror
Target release
Target charging
Camera
Laser
10 cm, 0.14 s
80 cm, 0.18 s
60 cm, 0.24 s
Key parametersTarget charge (~-0.1 nC), Target mass (300 mg), 4 mm diameterPeak velocity (5 m/s), Steering field range (±150 kV/m)Steering range (±2 mm)
IFT\P2006-067
We integrated in-flight steering with tracking system for real-time trajectory correction
Labview screen shot - details next slide…
IFT\P2006-067
We integrated in-flight steering with tracking system for real-time trajectory correction
Poisson spot
X vs time (mm)
Control signal Vi
Steering voltage based on X position (Poisson spot’s centroid) and velocity updates each ~10 ms
€
e.g.
Vi = −3000 X i + 30 X i − X i−1[ ]( )
Y
X
Steering voltage
Steering duration
X&Y positiontrace
-0.4 -
0.0 -
0.2 -
0.4 -
-0.2-
IFT\P2006-067
X position with various steering voltages
-1000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Drop number
Final X position (µm)
Standard deviation of target placement accuracy (1D) decreased from 254 to 107 µm
Much of remaining error is believed due to “curve ball” effect
in air
-1500 V
0 VActive
Feedback
v
F
~0.1 mrad accuracy is similar to that needed for IFE
Additional goal is ±20 µm at 0.5 m for FTF
IFT\P2006-067
GA’s EMS Group calculations support Robson’s magnetic slingshot concept feasibility
Conductingtube
Shuttle
S/C Coil
Trigger coil
Conducting tube provides centering force but induces
drag on shuttle
Magnetic slingshot concept advantages• Non-contacting ferromagnetic shuttle
• No friction wear• Centering force provided by conducting enclosure• No sabot or gas turbulence• Potentially very accurate• No mechanical feedthroughs required into cryostat• Powered via simple DC magnetic field
IFT\P2006-067
Vector Fields* calculations show centering force in conducting tube leads to ~1 oscillation period
Shuttle length = 40 mmShuttle radius = 4 mmCarrier saturation = 2.4 TTube inner radius = 8 mm
Tune for integer number of half oscillation periods during acceleration 12 ms for minimum radial velocity
r0
r0
Case (a)
Case (b)
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 1 2 3
Radial Position (mm)
Restoring Force (N)
1 mm skin depth Superconductor
Bertie’s analytical estimate = 8.6 ms for same assumptions
*
4000 N/m => T = 12.5 ms
This shows centering force is adequate
IFT\P2006-067
r Hm-
m+a
a
Coil drag and power dissipated are significant but acceptable with sufficient tube conductivity
• Energy dissipated per target ~15 mJ in high conductivity case (0.075 W)• Acceleration force = 81 N >> drag force• 2.51011(Ωm)-1 corresponds to very high-purity cryogenic aluminum
0.01
0.1
1
10
0 50 100
Velocity (m/s)
Drag Force (N)
250 GS/m 2.86 GS/m2.86109(Ωm)-1
2.51011(Ωm)-1
1
10
100
0 50 100
Velocity (m/s)
Power Dissipated (W)
250 GS/m 2.86 GS/m2.86109(Ωm)-1
2.51011(Ωm)-1
Eddy currents in tube wallinduce drag = P/v
IFT\P2006-067
A 40 coil design results in a very smooth acceleration profile
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.3510
15
20
25
30
35
z [m]
dB/dz [T/m]
0 150 300 Z (mm)
10
20
30
dB/dz
(T/m)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500
z [mm]
Field Bz along z-axis, r=0mm
250A 40
250A 20
200A 40
200A 20
0 200 400Z (mm)
0
5
10
Magnetic Field Bz
(T)
Acceleration
(G’s)
200
400
600
SC = Nb3Sn vf = 60 m/s
IFT\P2006-067
Summary of injection progressIn-flight target steering has been achieved•Real-time trajectory corrections based on position measurement
(v~5 m/s)
•1-D placement accuracy improved to 107 m (1 at 0.8 m standoff).
Calculations support the magnetic slingshot concept• Can achieve constant acceleration with a 40 coil design. • Adequate centering force is provided by a conducting tube.• Drag is acceptable with a sufficiently high-conductivity tube material (very high-purity aluminum).