Takeoff Rotation[1]

24
Take off rotation Some additional issues Operational Liaison Meeting – Fly-By-Wire aircraft 2004 Customer Services

Transcript of Takeoff Rotation[1]

Page 1: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Take off rotationSome additional issues

Operational Liaison Meeting – Fly-By-Wire aircraft 2004

Customer Services

Page 2: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 2© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Introduction

• Why do we talk again about Take Off Rotation?

It has been addressed in 2002 OLMs and in 2003 Performance & Operations Conference in Rome.

Some recent incidents call for some additional explanations.

Page 3: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 3© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Reminder of various recommendations

• The Rotation flying techniques are outlined in FCOM SOPs and supplementary techniques

• They address the lateral and the pitch control of the aircraft.

Page 4: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 4© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Reminder of various recommendations

• Regarding the lateral control of the aircraft:

? Do not apply large roll inputs in case of crosswind

4 Since they favor the natural “into the wind turn tendency” of the aircraft

4 Since spoilers extended increase the pitch required at lift off,thus reduce the tail strike margin (lift reduction)

4 Since a large lateral stick input may cause a lateral control problem at lift off.

Page 5: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 5© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Reminder of various recommendations

• Regarding the pitch control of the aircraft:? The T/O normal law is adapted to each aircraft model

so as to ensure a similar pitch rotation technique on all FBW models.

Gain Pitch rate

+- A319/321A330/340

A320Direct law

PitchRA

-

A340-500A340-600

Tail distanceprotection

Pitch rate targetmax 2.5°/sec

Pitch rate

Gainintegrator

Page 6: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 6© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Reminder of various recommendations

• Regarding the pitch control of the aircraft:

? At VR initiate rotation – with a positive side stick input for A330/A340, to achieve a continuous rotation of about 3o/sec, towards a pitch attitude of:

4 AOE: 15o (12.5o on A340-200/300)

4 OEI: 12.5o

NOTE: this pitch target is the average pitch which will be commanded by the FD pitch bar, once A/C is airborne and SRS available

Page 7: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 7© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Reminder of various recommendations

• Regarding the pitch control of the aircraft:

4Avoid aggressive and sharp stick inputs

4Avoid shy initial stick inputs and further aft stick inputs justprior lift off

4Avoid chasing FD bar during initial rotation

Page 8: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 8© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

T/O Rotation some additional issues

• In order to minimize tail strike risks, following recommendations apply:

4Avoid premature rotation4Avoid excessive rotation rate, over rotation4Apply proper THS setting4Avoid improper use of FD pitch bar during rotation

and also4Properly choose T/O configuration4Check Landing Gear shock absorbers

Page 9: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 9© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Properly Determine the Take Off Configuration

• CONF 1+F / CONF2 / CONF3 / are available for T/O As a general rule:

4A low T/O CONF (e.g. 1 + F) is preferable to optimize the 2nd

segment climb gradient, more particularly in hot weather

4A high T/O CONF (e.g. 3) is preferable– To improve tail clearance at lift off– To lower T/O speeds on rough runways

Page 10: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 10© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Properly Determine the Take Off Configuration

• The criteria used to determine the best T/O CONF are:

4The configuration allowing the Highest Flex Temp(Engine saving)

4The configuration allowing for Lower Take off Speeds

4The Preferred Configuration for comfortable Aircraft handling (e.g. tail strike)

Page 11: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 11© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Properly determine the Take off Configuration

• Some airplanes are more prone to tail strikes due to their geometry (e.g. A321, A340-500/600, …)

• For a given stick input at rotation, the tail clearance is reduced at lower configuration (e.g. 1+F), because the rotation rate is higher

• A compromise is to be done in between Flex Temp, lower T/O speed and preferred configuration for aircraft handling

⇒ Select the highest possible flap configuration, up to CONF3, provided it does not induce a Flex Temp greater than 5o.

Page 12: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 12© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Landing gear shock absorbers

• There are 2 types of gears regarding the kinematics of the shock absorbers (oleos) and wheels:

4The conventional gears with conventional oleos

4The shock absorbers associated to Rocking Bogie via a Pitch Trimmer

Page 13: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 13© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Landing gear shock absorbers

• The A330/A340 are fitted with Rocking Bogies

4The Rocking Bogie allows a greater pitch attitude at lift off than a conventional gear with the same stroke

4The shock absorber stroke is physically limited to about 750 mm. A conventional gear would need 1000 mm additional stroke on A340, for the same attitudes at rotation, than with Rocking Bogies

4The rotation of the bogie around rear wheels added to the oleo extension allows for such max pitch attitude

Page 14: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 14© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Comparison Conventional Gear with Rocking Bogie

131211109876543210

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Conventional Landing Gear

A340 ROCKING BOGIE CHARACTERISTICS

Landing Gear Fully Extended

Start of Bogie rotation

Start of Rocking Bogie Mechanism(400 mm shock absorber closure)

Tai

l Cle

aran

ce (°

)

Time (sec)

Materializes Additional Stroke Required

Lift Off

Lift Off

Att

itude

(o)

Time (sec)

A340 ROTATION LAW

2) 3) 4)

Rotation VR

Page 15: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 15© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

A340 Rocking Bogie Simplified Principle

1) Aircraft at VR+ - Beginning of rotationOleo has started to extend

At VR+

PitchTrimmer

2o

Page 16: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 16© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

A340 Rocking Bogie Simplified Principle

2) Aircraft between VR and VLOF, with pitch increasing and A/C accelerating.Typically when pitch about 5°/6°, shock absorber is 400 mm and pitch trimmer bottomed. Front wheels and MLG leg are mechanically interlocked.

PitchTrimmer

Between VR and VLOF

6o

At VR+

2o

400 mm

Page 17: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 17© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

A340 Rocking Bogie Simplified Principle

3) The shock absorber cannot extend, the rocking bogie cannot rotate as long as A/C lift has not reached a certain value. Shock absorberremains at 400 mm. Since pitch increases, tail clearance decreases and reaches minimum prior lift off.

At VR+

PitchTrimmer

2o

Between VR and VLOF

6o 9o

400 mm

Page 18: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 18© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

A340 Rocking Bogie Simplified Principle

4) The lift has increased; the oleo can further extend and the bogie can rotate; the tail clearance slightly decreases, while the A/C pitch increases.

At VR+

PitchTrimmer

2o

Between VR and VLOF

6o 9o 12o

Close to VLOF

Page 19: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 23© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Landing Gear with Rocking Bogie

• The Rocking Bogie allows to fly greater pitch attitude at lift off

• The Rocking Bogie kinematics are such that the minimum tail clearance is actually reached before lift off, at initial bogie rotation

? This is an additional reason to positively initiate rotation, and avoid further aft stick inputs during rotation (Pitch ≈ 8o …)

Page 20: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 24© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

A340 / A330 Rotation Law Technique

LIFT OFF

POORPOOR

GOOD

Time (sec)

Att

itu

de

(o )

Page 21: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 25© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Landing Gear with Rocking Bogie

• On any type of Landing Gear, servicing shall ensure that oleos are properly pressurized.

• The effects of low pressure in oleos are somehow increased with the Rocking Bogie system, indeed:4A low pressure oleo delays the time where pitch trimmer is

bottomed4A low pressure oleo delays the time where the bogie starts to

rotate

? Typically, a 10 bars low pressure in oleo, leadingto a 60 mm oleo reduction, decreases the tail clearance by approximately 1 ft (or 1o)

Page 22: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 26© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

A340 Tail Clearance During Take Off1614121086420-2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

A340 Rotation Law

A340 Rocking Bogie Characteristics

Lift Off

Lift Off

Landing GearsFully Extended

Start of Rocking Bogie mechanism(400 mm shock absorber closure)

Maximum Pitch Attitude / Ground (o)Start of Bogie rotation

Att

itude

(o)

Tail Clearance (o) (ft)

Nominal pressureNominal – 10 bars

Time (sec)

Time (sec)

Page 23: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 27© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

Conclusions

• This presentation actually enhances 3 issues:

4All present recommendations in SOPs and FCOM supplementary techniques are unchanged

4But configuration must be judiciously determined.Amongst others, higher CONF is preferable provided that FLX TEMP is not penalized by more than 5o C

4Shock absorbers must be adequately pressurized.Crews shall check consistency in between both MLG shock absorbers length, and report any suspected anomaly.

Page 24: Takeoff Rotation[1]

Takeoff rotation Page 28© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

. Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S. No intellectual property rights are granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied.

The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof.

AN EADS JOINT COMPANYWITH BAE SYSTEMS