Tactical Decision Making Group

download Tactical Decision Making Group

of 33

Transcript of Tactical Decision Making Group

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    1/33

    Management Accounting

    TACTICAL DECISION MAKING

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    2/33

    MEMBER OF GROUP

    Keichy Anomosa 1110532068

    Putri Suryani 1110532063

    Winda Wulansari 1110532012

    Ramagita Iswara 1110532049

    Triana W.W.N 1110533046

    Yulvita Andriani 1110533025

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    3/33

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES

    1. Distinguish between tactical decisionmaking and strategic decision making

    2. Explain the tactical decision model

    3. Explain relevant costs and irrelevant cost as

    well as the examples of relevant costs and

    irrelevant costs4. Apply the concept of relevant cost to make

    our by decision

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    4/33

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES (Cont.)

    5. Apply concept of relevant cost to keep or drop decision

    6. Apply concept of relevant cost to special order decision

    7. Apply to concept of relevant cost to sell at split offpoint or process further decision

    8. Explain the impact of cost on pricing decisions.

    9. Use linear programming to find the optimal solution toa problem of multiple constrained resources.

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    5/33

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    6/33

    SUB-TOPICS OF DISCUSSION (Cont.)

    Application of relevant cost to make or buy

    decision

    Application of relevant cost to keep or drop

    decision

    Application of relevant cost to special order

    decision

    Application of relevant cost tosell at split off

    point or process furthher decision

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    7/33

    TACTICAL DECISION MAKING :

    DEFINITION

    Tactical decision making consist of

    choosing among alternatives with an

    immediate or limited end in viewStrategic decision making is selecting

    among alternative strategies so that

    long term competitive advantage is

    estabilished.

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    8/33

    TACTICAL DECISION MODEL

    Recognized , define the problem

    Identify alternatives , eliminating those that

    are unfeasible

    Identify costs and benefits

    Total relevant costs , benefits of each

    alternatives Assess qualitative factors

    Select alternative with greatest overall benefit

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    9/33

    Step 1 : define the problem Increase capacity for warehousing and production

    Step 2 : identify alternatives 1. Build new facility

    2. Lease larger facility ; sublease current facility

    3. Lease additional facility

    4. Lease warehouse space5. Buy shafts and bushing ; free up space

    Step 3 : identify costs ,

    benefits

    Alt 4: +benefits

    Alt 5: +benefits

    Step 4 : total relevant costs

    and benefits

    Alt 4 : cost $1000 rent and make

    Alt 5 : cost $ 800 (buy from supplier)

    Differential cost $200 (alt 5 chosen)

    Step 5 : assess qualitative

    factors

    1. Product quality

    2. Reliability of external supplier

    3. Price stability4. Labor relations and community image

    Step 6 : make decision Continue producing and lease warehouse (alt 4 is

    chosen if assuming qualitative factors are not)

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    10/33

    Relevant Costs Defined

    relevant cost is the cost that affects the

    decision . The main characteristic of relevant

    costs are future costs are future costs that

    differ across alternatives

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    11/33

    COST CONCEPTS ASSOCIATED WITH

    DECISION MAKING Opportunity cost

    Opportunity cost is benefit (revenue) that is sacrificed because of choosing

    alternative. For example, salary that you sacrifice because of choosing to study

    at the university. Opportunity cost is relevant cost because it affects the

    decision that will be made

    Avoidable and unavoidable cost

    Avoidable cost is the cost that will vanish by choosing the alternatives . For

    examples are variable production costs and avoidable fixed factory overhead

    cost . Avoidable cost is relevant cost . Unavoidable cost is the cost that will still

    occur whatever alternatives are chosen . Avoidable cost is irrelevant cost.

    Sunk cost

    Sunk cost is cost that occurred because of previous decision , for example

    depreciation expense . Sunk cost is relevant cost.

    Differential cost

    Differential costs are that differ among the alternatives . Differential cost is a

    relevant cost .

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    12/33

    APPLICATION OF RELEVANT COST

    Make or buy decision

    Keep or drop decision

    Special order decision

    Sell at split off point or process furtherdecision

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    13/33

    When is this decision?When there is supplier offering the samecomponent a lower price

    What are relevant costs and irrelevant costs in

    this decision?- Relevant costs are avoidable cost

    - Irrelevant costs are unavoidable fixed factoryoverhead cost

    When is buy decision made?When avoidable manufacturing costs is greaterthan cost of purchase or cost of purchase minusopportunity cost

    MAKE OR BUY DECISION

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    14/33

    Example:

    Production cost of component X at capacity of 1000 units arefollows:

    Unit cost Total

    Raw material Rp. 500 Rp. 500.000

    Direct Labour 400 400.000

    FOH-variable 150 150.000

    FOH-fixed 450 450.000Total Rp. 1500 Rp.1500.000

    Of total fixed factory overhead cost, included property tax

    Rp. 50.000, and depreciation expense of factory buildingRp.200.000. External supplier offers the same componentfor Rp. 1350/per unit.

    Required: Should we accept the suppliers offering?

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    15/33

    KEEP OR DROP DECISION Keep or drop decision is the decision about whether or not

    a segment , such as a product line , division, or branch

    should be kept or dropped When is this decision made ? When the segment is getting

    a loss

    Segmented report prepared on a variable costing basisprovides valuable information for keep or drop decision

    What are relevant costs and irrelevant costs for thisdecision?

    - Relevant costs are avoidable costs (variable costs andavoidable fixed costs) and opportunity cost

    - Irrelevant costs are unavoidable fixed costs When is drop decision made?

    When revenues of dropped segment is lower than theiravoidable costs or when segment has a loss

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    16/33

    PT.Coca Cola producers three products: Coca

    Cola, Fanta, and Sprite. The accounting

    manager has prepared the following

    estimated income statement for 200x (in

    thousand of rupiahs) :

    Sample Problem

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    17/33

    Coca cola Fanta Sprite Total

    Sales 500 800 150 1,450

    Variable expenses (250) (480) (120) (850)Contribution margin 250 320 30 600

    Direct fixed expenses :

    -Advertising (10) (10) (10) (30)

    -Salaries (17) (20) (15) (52)

    -depreciation (73) (60) (30) (163)

    -Total (100) (90) (55) (245)

    Segment Margin 150 230 (25) 355Common fixed expenses (40) (40) (40) (120)

    Operating income (loss) 110 190 (65) 235

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    18/33

    Because the projected performance of sprite

    product line shows a negative segment

    margin, management of PT Coca Cola is trying

    to decide to drop the Sprite product line.

    Required :

    What is the best decision for this case?

    To drop the sprite product line (assuming the sprite

    capacity is idle)

    Sprite capacity used for expansion of Fanta product line

    (increase sales of 20%)

    Sprite capacity can be rented to other party for Rp

    50,000

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    19/33

    SPECIAL ORDER DECISION

    This decision is related to accept or reject the special order from a

    particular customer When is this decision made?

    When customer wants to buy the product at highly lower price

    Special order is the order from potential customers in markets not

    ordinarily served or non regular customers Fixed costs will not be assigned to special order because they have

    been fully assigned to regular sales (orders)

    What are relevant costs and irrelevant costs for this decision?

    - Relevant costs are variable costs and additional costs related to

    special order

    - Irrelevant costs are fixed cost

    When will special order be accepted?

    When the price of special order is greater then variable costs and

    additional costs related to special order

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    20/33

    SELL AT SPLIT OFF POINT OR PROCESS FURTHER

    DECISION

    Join product are two or more products that areproduced through a common process

    Join products can be identified at a split off point(the point that products are distinguishable ).

    Joint costs are the costs to produce the jointproduct

    Separable costs are the costs incurred afterproducts are identifiable or costs to processfurther

    Sometimes, it is more profitable to process a jointproduct further , beyond the split off point

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    21/33

    What are relevant costs and irrelevant costs forthis decision

    - Relevant costs are separable costs andopportunity cost (revenue of split off productforegone because of processing further) as wellas the price after products are processed further

    - Irrelevant costs are joint costs When is process the product further decision

    made

    When additional revenue is greater than separablecost or when sales revenue after products areprocessed further is greater than separable costsand opportunity costs

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    22/33

    the impact of cost on pricing decisions

    Costs are important inputs into the pricing

    decision. Cost-based pricing uses a markup

    based on a subset of costs. Target costing

    works backward from a price acceptable toconsumers to find the cost necessary to

    manufacture the product.

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    23/33

    Use linear programming to find the

    optimal solution

    Linear programming is a method that locates

    the optimal solution in a set of feasible

    solutions. The graphical method may be usedwith two products. When more than two

    products are involved, the simplex method is

    used.

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    24/33

    Formulasi dari linear programing

    Formulasi dari linear programing dibuat dalam

    model matematik dan sesuai dengan problem

    manajerial, untuk itu perlu diketahui lebih

    dahulu: Problem manajerial harus dapat dijelaskan dengan sempurna

    Mengidentifikasi mana yang menjadi fungsi tujuan dan fungsi

    batasan

    Tentukan variabel yang akan menjadi keputusan Variabel-variabel yang ada dalam fungsi tujuan dan batasan

    harus dapat diekspresikan dalam bentuk matematik

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    25/33

    Case

    Sebuah perusahaan menghasilkan dua macam produk yaitu

    tas dan dompet . Jumlah sumber daya yang diperlukan untukmemproduksi kedua macam produk ini adalah kulit danbenang. Setiap unit tas yang dihasilkan membutuhkan kulit

    dan benang 0,5m dan 0,25kg. Keperluan untuk dompet setiapunitnya memerlukan kulit 0,25m sedangkan benang 1kg.Sumberdaya yang tersedia di perusahaan setiap bulannyapaling banyak untuk bahan kulit 100m dan benang 100kg.Pada kasus ini masalah yang dihadapi perusahaan adalah

    menentukan jumlah tas dan dompet yang akan diproduksiagara perusahaan dapat memperoleh keuntungan yang maxdimana keuntungan per unit untuk tas 1000 dan dompet 250.

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    26/33

    1. Fungsi tujuan(objective function)

    Z=1000X+250Y

    2.Contraints function (fungsi kendala)

    Batasan kulit: 0,50X+0,25Y100

    Batasan benang: 0,25X+Y1003. Non negatif contraints

    x0; y0

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    27/33

    1. Sumbu kulit

    0,5x+0,25Y100

    Mis x=0, maka

    0,5(0)+0,25y100

    X400 ..A(0,400)

    Y=0, maka

    0,5x+0,25(0)100

    Y200.B(200,0)

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    28/33

    2.Sumbu benang

    0,25x+y100Mis: x=0,maka

    0,25(0)+y100

    y100........C(0,100)

    y=0,maka

    0,25x+0100

    X400.D(400,0)

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    29/33

    E:

    0,5 x+0,25y 100 1 0,5 x+0,25y 1000,25 x+ y 100 2 0,5 x+ 2y 200

    -1,75y -100

    y57,1430,5 x+0,25(57,143) 100

    x 171,43

    E(171,43;57,143)

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    30/33

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    31/33

    Kesimpulan:Dari keempat titik O,C,B,E maka nilai yang palingmaksimal ada di titik B. Berarti produksi tassebanyak 200 unit dan tidak memproduksi

    dompet maka keuntungan yang akan di perolehakan maximal yaitu senilai 200.000

    Titik Sudut X Y Z=1000x+250y

    O 0 0 0C 0 100 25000

    B 200 0 200000

    E 171,43 57,143 185715,75

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    32/33

    Graphical solutions are not practical with

    more than two or three products. Fortunately,

    an algorithm called the simplex method can

    be used to solve larger linear programmingproblems.

    Metode simplek linear programing

    dipecahkan secara aljabar

  • 8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group

    33/33

    hanks for attention